Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EvaluationinEducation Chapte1
EvaluationinEducation Chapte1
net/publication/342449563
CITATIONS READS
4 95,601
1 author:
Prakash Srinivasan
Thiagarajar College of Preceptors,(Aided) Madurai
97 PUBLICATIONS 42 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Prakash Srinivasan on 25 June 2020.
Editor
Dr. T. MANICHANDER
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION
Dr. T. Manichander
ISBN: 978-1-329-82275-7
Published by,
Lulu Publication
3101 Hillsborough St,
Raleigh, NC 27607,
United States.
Printed by,
Laxmi Book Publication,
258/34, RaviwarPeth,
Solapur, Maharashtra, India.
Contact No. : +91 9595 359 435
Website: http://www.isrj.org
Email ID: ayisrj@yahoo.in
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
- Dr. T. Manichander
ABOUT THE EDITOR
Dr. T. Manichander is the Chief Editor
for Research Tracks; an International Indexed
& Peer Reviewed Bi-Annually Journal in
Education (ISSN 2347-4637), Chief Editor for
Research Demagogue; an International
Refereed, Indexed & Peer Reviewed Bi-
Annually Journal in Education (ISSN 2350-
1081), Co Editor for Research Nebula; an
International Refereed, Peer Reviewed &
Indexed Quarterly Journal in Arts, Commerce,
Education & Social Sciences (ISSN 2277-
8071), Regional Editor for Golden Research
Thoughts Journal (ISSN 2231-5063) and
Regional Editor for Indian Streams Research
Journal (ISSN 2230-7850). He has published
several Articles in National and International
Journals. He has presented Papers in
Seminars/Conferences at National and
International levels. He got Indian Council of
Social Science Research (ICSSR) Short Term
Doctoral Fellowship in Education from New
Delhi.
List of Authors
1 Educational Evaluation 1
2 Statistics in Educational 45
Evaluation
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Chapter 1:
Educational Evaluation
Dr. S. Prakash
Pg|2
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|3
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|4
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|5
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Types of Evaluation:
There are two main levels of evaluation viz., programme
level and student level. Each of the two levels can involve either of
the two main types of evaluation - formative and summative at
various stages. Programme evaluation has to do with the
determination of whether a programme has been successfully
implemented or not. Student evaluation determines how well a
student is performing in a programme of study.
Formative Evaluation:
The purpose of formative evaluation is to find out whether
after a learning experience, students are able to do what they were
previously unable to do. Its ultimate goal is usually to help students
perform well at the end of a programme.
Formative evaluation enables the teacher to:
1) Draw more reliable inference about his students than an
external assessor, although he may not be as objective as
the latter;
2) Identify the levels of cognitive process of his students;
3) Choose the most suitable teaching techniques and
materials;
4) Determine the feasibility of a programme within the
classroom setting;
5) Determine areas needing modifications or improvement in
the teaching-learning process; and
6) Determine to a great extent the outcome of summative
evaluation (Ogunniyi, 1984).
Some of the questions often asked under this type of evaluation
include:
1. What is the objective of the lesson?
2. What materials will be needed to teach this lesson?
Pg|6
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|7
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Summative Evaluation:
The goal of summative evaluation is to evaluate student
learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it
against some standard or benchmark.
Summative evaluations are often high stakes, which means
that they have a high point value. Examples of summative
evaluations include:
a midterm exam
a final project
a paper
a senior recital
Information from summative evaluations can be used
formatively when students or faculty use it to guide their efforts and
activities in subsequent courses.
Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation:
School education is the necessary foundation for
strengthening human resources that has been deemed central for
the National development. Since the time of our independence,
many committees and commissions persistently emphasized upon
the free and compulsory education in our country. Among various
measures that have been adopted to expand the provisions for
realizing the goal of universalizing elementary education, the
National Policy of Education had made several recommendations to
improve the quality of school education. The recommendations
include the child-centered approach improvement in the quality of
education through reforms in the context and the process of
education, school facilities, additional teachers, laying down
minimum levels of learning, and emphasis upon continuous and
comprehensive evaluation. This paper examines the concept of
continuous and comprehensive evaluation, its need and importance,
role of teachers and its implementation in schools with an empirical
support.
Pg|9
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|10
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|14
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|15
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|16
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|17
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|18
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|19
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|20
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|21
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
b) Written test:
These are tests where in the answers to the questions are to
be recorded in sheets of paper to be gone through and evaluated by
the teacher leisurely later. In long answer essay question and short
answer paragraph question, the language efficiency as well as the
specificity of the points of presentation which are purely subjective
can be tested. In objective phrase response questions, recall or
recognition, the accuracy and correctness of the responses without
subjectivity are tested.
c) Performance tests:
These are tests concerning the psychomotor activity
assessment. The skills of observation, drawing, experimentation,
manipulation, articulation etc. are significantly tested as in
performance tests.
Written Tests:
Essay Type Test:
The essay test is probably the most popular of teacher-made
tests. In general, a classroom essay test consists of a small number
of questions to which the student is expected to demonstrate in
his/her response his/her ability to (a) recall factual, conceptual, or
procedural knowledge, (b) organize this knowledge, and (c) interpret
the information critically in a logical, integrated answer to the
question. An essay test item can be classified as either an extended-
response or a short-answer. The latter calls for a more restricted or
limited answer in terms of form or scope. An example of each type
of essay item follows.
Extended-Response: Explain the difference between the S-R
(Stimulus-Response) and the S-O-R (Stimulus-Organism-
Response) theories of personality. Include in your answer (a)
brief descriptions of both theories, (b) supporters of both
theories and (c) research methods used to study each of the
two theories. (10 pts. 20 minutes)
Pg|22
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|23
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|24
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|25
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|26
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|27
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|29
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|30
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|31
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
pair.
Pg|32
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|33
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|35
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|36
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|37
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|38
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|39
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|40
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|41
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
asked to do more with less. Worse still, the respect that society had
traditionally placed upon public school teachers is eroding, as
teacher bashing and attacks on the very value of a public education
are becoming a regular part of the political landscape.
Consequently, teacher burnout has become the plague of the
modern schoolhouse.
Many teachers now ask, “Am I making any difference?”
Regardless of all the negative pressures on teachers, the sheer
nobility of the work keeps many dedicated educators on the job, but
only so long as they can get credible answers to the “efficacy”
question. However, without credible evidence that the work of
teaching is making a difference, it is hard to imagine the best and
brightest sticking with such a difficult and poorly compensated line
of work. Fortunately, evidence has shown that teachers who elect to
integrate the use of data into their work start exhibiting the
compulsive behavior of fitness enthusiasts who regularly weigh
themselves, check their heart rate, and graph data on their
improving physical development. For both teachers and athletes,
the continuous presence of compelling data that their hard work is
paying off becomes, in itself, a vitally energizing force.
Meeting the Needs of a Diverse Student Body:
In a homogeneous society in which all students come to
school looking alike, it might be wise to seek the one right answer to
questions of pedagogy. But, as anyone who has recently visited an
American classroom can attest, it is rare to find any two children for
whom the same intervention could ever be “right on target.” The
days are gone when it was possible to believe that all a teacher had
to do was master and deliver the grade-level curriculum. It is now
imperative that classroom teachers have strong content background
in each of the subjects they teach, be familiar with the range of
student differences in their classrooms, and be capable of
diagnosing and prescribing appropriate instructional modifications
based upon knowledge of each child's uniqueness.
Pg|42
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|43
EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Educational Evaluation
Pg|44