You are on page 1of 8

Paraneoplastic Granulomatous Vitritis

Elaboration of 8 Cases
Lindsay A. McGrath, FRANZCO,1,* Hardeep S. Mudhar, FRCPath,2,* Richard Sheard, FRCOphth,3,4
Kurt Spiteri-Cornish, FRCOphth,3 Stephen Winder, FRCOphth,3 Paul Rundle, FRCOphth,1
Ian G. Rennie, FRCOphth1

Purpose: To describe the clinical features in a series of 8 patients with cytologically proven granulomatous
vitritis in the context of systemic malignancy.
Design: Retrospective case review series from 2004 through 2018 to identify all cases of cytologically proven
granulomatous vitritis and to analyze its disease associations and causes.
Participants: Twenty-three patients with a cytologic diagnosis of granulomatous vitritis were identified, 8 of
whom demonstrated systemic malignancy.
Main Outcome Measures: To identify a clinical profile of the 8 cases of granulomatous vitritis occurring in
the setting of systemic malignancy, focusing on the timing of the eye presentation compared with the timing of
the systemic malignancy.
Methods: Patients with a cytologic diagnosis of granulomatous vitritis seeking treatment from 2004 through
2018 were included in this retrospective case series. Case notes were recalled and reviewed for demographic
features, medical history, presenting symptoms, investigations, surgical procedures, and follow-up.
Results: Twenty-three patients were diagnosed cytologically with granulomatous vitritis. Ten of 23 patients
(43%) showed autoimmune and infectious causes, 5 of 23 patients (22%) showed were idiopathic causes, and 8
of 23 patients’ (35%) disease was associated with systemic malignancy. In the latter group, the median age at
presentation was 70 years (range, 55e89 years). Six patients showed bilateral disease, and the remaining 3
showed unilateral disease. Three of 8 patients showed primary systemic malignancy diagnosed after eye
symptoms and 5 of 8 showed malignancy before the eye symptoms. These latter 5 patients all demonstrated a
major relapse, metastasis, or both at the time of eye symptoms.
Conclusions: Paraneoplastic vitritis is primarily a disease of older age, with 67% of those affected older than
65 years. Ophthalmologists should maintain a high index of suspicion of paraneoplastic cause in bilateral pos-
terior segment inflammation of uncertain origin, presenting for the first time, or heralding malignancy recurrence or
metastasis in known cases of malignancy. Ophthalmology Retina 2019;3:589-596 ª 2019 by the American
Academy of Ophthalmology

Ocular manifestations of systemic malignancy are important 4 of whom had histologically confirmed intraocular granu-
for the ophthalmologist to recognize because they may pre- lomas, occurring in the setting of systemic malignancy.10
cede the diagnosis of cancer. There are several well-described Herein, we present an additional 8 cases of cytologically
ophthalmic paraneoplastic syndromes including carcinoma- proven granulomatous vitritis heralding systemic
associated retinopathy,1 melanoma-associated retinopathy,2 malignancy in 3 patients and indicating relapse or
bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation,3 and metastasis of pre-existing malignancy in 5 patients.
paraneoplastic vitelliform retinopathy.4,5 Uveitis has been
noted to occur in the presence of systemic malignancy and has
been termed pseudouveitis.6,7 Nonnecrotizing granulomas Methods
have been reported in association with a variety of solid and
hematologic malignancies. These are reported commonly in A review of the records from the Ocular Oncology and Uveitis
lymph nodes draining the malignancy but also have been Services at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital for the diagnosis of
granulomatous vitritis was performed. Patients with a cytologic
encountered in distant organs.8 diagnosis of granulomatous vitritis seeking treatment from 2004
We previously reported the first case of paraneoplastic through 2018 were included in this retrospective case series. Case
granulomatous vitritis in the context of recurrent Hodgkin notes were recalled and reviewed for demographic features, med-
lymphoma.9 A further series was published in 2015 that ical history, presenting symptoms, drug history, investigations,
presented 5 patients with sarcoid-like reactions in the eye, surgical procedures, and follow-up. The patients gave routine

 2019 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2019.03.003 589


Published by Elsevier Inc. ISSN 2468-6530/19
Ophthalmology Retina Volume 3, Number 7, July 2019

Table 1. Patients Whose Systemic Malignancy Was Diagnosed after Vitrectomy

Survival after
Time to Date of Malignancy Diagnosis
Patient Age Ocular Vitrectomy Malignancy Type of and Cause of Death
No. (yrs) Gender Findings (mos) Diagnosis (mos) Malignancy (mos)
1 66 F Right eye, 6/9; left eye, 6/ T þ 12 T þ 84 Breast adenocarcinoma Died T þ 132 of
5; bilateral vitritis, 1þ; metastatic breast
mild periphlebitis carcinoma
2 71 F Right eye, 6/36; left eye, Tþ8 T þ 84 Gallbladder carcinoma Died T þ 84 of metastatic
6/6; right eye, mutton with multiple gallbladder carcinoma
fat KP, 2þ AC, and peritoneal metastases
vitreous cells
3 55 F Right eye, 6/24; left eye, Tþ1 Tþ3 CD30-positive cerebral T- Died T þ 3 of CD30-
6/18; bilateral vitritis cell lymphoma positive aggressive
2þ, bilateral retinal cerebral T-cell
vasculitis lymphoma

AC ¼ anterior chamber; F ¼ female; T ¼ time of ophthalmology presentation, timing of clinical events is shown as months before (minus) or after (plus).

consent for surgery and for use of their photographs. The work was Results
carried out in accordance with the tenets of the 1964 Declaration of
Helsinki and its subsequent modifications. The Research and A total of 23 patients underwent diagnostic vitrectomy according to
Development Office (equivalent of an institutional research board)
the indications described above. All 23 patients were diagnosed
at our institution confirmed this study was a clinical retrospective
case review and not research. cytologically with granulomatous vitritis. Ten of 23 cases of
All patients underwent systemic screening before surgery to granulomatous vitritis (43%) were attributable to autoimmune or
determine a cause of their symptoms. This included blood testsd infectious causes (autoimmune causes included 1 case each of
complete blood count, serum liver enzymes, renal function, Crohn’s uveitis, sarcoid, and multiple sclerosis; infectious causes
electrolytes, inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, included 2 cases each of Candida and Toxoplasmosis infection and
C-reactive protein), angiotensin-converting enzyme, rheumatologic 1 case each of cytomegalovirus, cytomegalovirus and Aspergillus
markers (antinuclear antibody, antineutrophil cytoplasmic anti- species infection, and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species
body, and rheumatoid factor)dinfective screen (syphilis and infection), and 5 of 23 cases of granulomatous vitritis (22%) were
tuberculosis), and chest radiography. All patients underwent 23- or idiopathic. An infectious cause was confirmed with sampling of
25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy performed by 1 of 3 authors (RS,
blood and vitreous samples.12 The remaining 8 of 23 cases of
SW, or KS-C). Our vitrectomy technique has been described
elsewhere.11,12 The indications for diagnostic vitrectomy were to granulomatous vitritis (35%) were associated with systemic
exclude intraocular lymphoma, infection, or atypical clinical fea- malignancy, and these cases are discussed in detail as follows.
tures or progression where systemic investigations revealed no The average age at presentation was 70 years (median, 70 years;
cause. range, 51e89 years). Six of 8 patients demonstrated bilateral
The vitreous cassette washings were fixed rapidly in theatre disease, and the remaining 2 patients demonstrated unilateral
with an equal volume of methanol-based fixative to preserve cell disease.
morphologic features for cytologic examination. Two thirds of the None of this group of patients were using any medications
vitreous cassette washings were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 40 associated with uveitis such as antibiotics, checkpoint inhibitors, or
minutes to create a pellet, which then was processed without tumor necrosis factor a antagonists. Three of 8 patients demon-
formalin fixation to paraffin wax. Twenty to 40 serial sections
strated primary systemic malignancy diagnosed after eye symp-
were cut with every tenth stained with a standard
hematoxylineeosin stain for light microscopic examination. The toms at a mean of 57 months later (median, 84 months later; range,
intervening spare sections were stained with the following: gram 3e84 months later; see Table 1). Two of these malignancies were
stain for bacteria, periodic acideSchiff for fungi and intracellular carcinomas, and the third was a primary central nervous system
organisms (e.g., Whipple’s disease), Grocott’s stain for fungi, and T-cell lymphoma. In 5 of 8 patients, systemic malignancy was
ZiehleNeelsen for mycobacteria. Every patient underwent diagnosed before vitritis; clinically, all were in remission. In
immunohistochemical staining with a panel that comprised the these patients, the development of vitritis heralded a relapse of a
following antibodies: CD3, CD20, CD68 (PGM1), CD30, and previous malignancy or a newly diagnosed metastasis from the
Ki67. Additional lymphoid immunohistochemical panels were original malignancy, at the time of the eye symptoms (see
used according to the clinical context. One third of the remaining Table 2). One patient’s disease was associated with Hodgkin’s
vitreous washings were saved for B- and T-cell clonality analysis
lymphoma, 2 patients’ disease was associated with chronic
and for MYD88 mutational analysis if required. The patients were
followed up at regular intervals according to the postoperative lymphocytic lymphoma or leukemia, 1 patient’s disease was
protocols in place at the time. Continuous variables such as age, associated with malignant adrenal pheochromocytoma, and 1
time to diagnosis, and duration of follow-up were described using patient’s disease was associated with endometrial adenocarcinoma.
mean, standard deviation, and median values in the studied The mean ophthalmology follow-up was 55 months (median,
patients. 36 months; range, 3e132 months). Only 3 patients survived during

590
Table 2. Patients with Pre-existing Malignancy in Whom the Vitritis Heralded a Recurrence or Metastasis

McGrath et al
Malignancy Date of
Date of Date of Status Recurrence Features of
Age Malignancy Malignancy Ocular Vitrectomy at Time of Eye or Metastasis Recurrence or
Patient No. (yrs) Gender (mos) Type Findings (mos) Presentation Diagnosis (mos) Metastasis Outcome
4 51 M T e 108 Adrenal Right eye, 6/5; left eye, T þ 13 Remission; no T þ 36 Multiple systemic Alive T þ 58
phaeochromocytoma 6/4; right eye, 1þ AC treatment metastases


cells, 2þ vitritis
Tþ1 Tþ6 Died T þ 96

Paraneoplastic Granulomatous Vitritis


5 70 F T e 24 Nodular sclerosing Right eye, 6/9; left eye, 6/ Remission; no Hilar and
Hodgkin lymphoma 4; right eye, 1þ vitritis treatment mediastinal lymph
node recurrence
6 75 F T e 36 Chronic lymphocytic Right eye, 1/60; left eye, Tþ1 Remission; no Tþ0 Recurrence in both optic Died T þ 18
leukemia 6/18; right eye, optic treatment nerves
disc swelling; left eye, (under
vitritis 2þ observation)
7 89 F T e 120 Chronic lymphocytic Right eye, 6/12; left eye, Tþ1 Remission; no Tþ0 Increased Alive T þ 8
leukemia 6/18; bilateral 2þ AC treatment abdominal, mesenteric,
cells; bilateral vitritis and retroperitoneal LN;
1þ new head of pancreatic
mass; increased
hepatosplenomegaly
8 84 F T  24 Endometrial Right eye, 6/12; left eye, Tþ1 Remission; No Tþ0 Multiple pulmonary Alive T þ 12
adenocarcinoma 6/18; bilateral 1þ AC treatment metastases (palliative care)
cells; bilateral vitritis
1e2þ

AC ¼ anterior chamber; F ¼ female; LN ¼ lymph node; M ¼ male; T ¼ time of ophthalmology presentation, timing of clinical events is shown as months before (minus) or after (plus).
591
Ophthalmology Retina Volume 3, Number 7, July 2019

Table 3. Summary of Cytologic and Additional Investigation Findings in the Vitreous Samples

Stain Results
Periodic
Patient Vitreous Cytologic Analysis Acide Ziehle Immunohistochemical Additional Histologic
No. Light Microscopic Findings Gram Schiff Grocott Neelsen Findings Investigation Results
1 DM, G, SL, and some MNG; no Negative Negative Negative Negative G, CD68þ; SL, CD3þ; None
atypical lymphoid population CD20e, CD30e, Ki67,
<1%
2 DM, G, and SL; no atypical Negative Negative Negative Negative G, CD68þ; SL, CD3þ; PCR on paraffin section; no
lymphoid population CD20e, CD30e, Ki67, mycobacteria DNA detected
<1%
3 DM, G, and SL; no atypical Negative Negative Negative Negative G, CD68þ; SL, CD3þ; PCR for T- and B-cell clonality on
lymphoid population CD20e, CD30e, Ki67, vitreous showed no clones;
10% (T-cells and MYD88, no mutation identified
macrophages)
4 DM, G, and SL; no atypical Negative Negative Negative Negative G, CD68þ; SL, CD3þ; None
lymphoid population CD20e, CD30e, Ki67,
<1%
5 DM, G, and SL; no atypical Negative Negative Negative Negative G, CD68þ; SL, CD3þ; CD15 negative; EBV negative (no
lymphoid population; small CD20e, CD30e, Ki67, evidence of Hodgkin’s cells in
retina fragment showing <1% vitreous or retina)
granulomas and giant cells
6 DM, G, and SL; No atypical Negative Negative Negative Negative G, CD68þ; SL, CD3þ; No B cells were present in the
lymphoid population CD20e, CD30e, Ki67, vitreous (CD20 negative); CD5
<1% stained reactive T cells and no
CD23-positive cells present;
therefore, no evidence of
vitreous CLL
7 DM, G, and SL; no atypical Negative Negative Negative Negative G-CD68þ, SL-CD3þ, No B cells were present in the
lymphoid population CD20e, CD30-Ki67 5% vitreous (CD20 negative); CD5
(T cells and stained reactive T cells and no
macrophages) CD23-positive cells present;
therefore, no evidence of
vitreous CLL
8 DM, G, and SL; no atypical Negative Negative Negative Negative G-CD68þ, SL-CD3þ, Cytokeratin (AE1, AE3, MNF116)
lymphoid population CD20e, CD30-Ki67-5% negative and therefore showed
(T cells and no metastatic carcinoma in the
macrophages) vitreous

CLL ¼ chronic lymphocytic leukemia; DM ¼ dispersed macrophages; EBV ¼ Epstein-Barr virus; G ¼ granulomas; MNG ¼ multinucleate giant cells;
PCR ¼ polymerase chain reaction; SL ¼ small reactive lymphocytes.

the follow-up period. Of the patients who died, they did so at a right eye. She had a history of cutaneous lymphocytic vasculitis
mean of 57 months (median, 51 months; range, 3e132 months) diagnosed 6 months before presentation. At presentation, visual
after presentation to the ophthalmology department. All 8 patients acuity was 6/24 in the right eye and 6/18 in the left eye. Exami-
showed very similar cytologic findings, and these are summarized nation revealed moderate vitritis in both eyes, and fluorescein
in Table 3. All the patients showed dispersed populations of angiography showed evidence of vascular permeability
epithelioid histiocytes accompanied by small lymphocytes, with (Fig 2AeD). The patient underwent systemic screening to rule out
well-formed granulomas made up of congregating epithelioid his- inflammatory and infective causes of intraocular inflammation. All
tiocytes (Fig 1A, B). The dispersed epithelioid histiocytes and serologic testing and chest imaging results were within normal
granulomas showed positive results for CD68 (a marker of limits. The patient underwent diagnostic vitrectomy that showed
macrophages), and the small lymphocytes showed positive CD68-positive granulomas and dispersed epithelioid histiocytes,
results for CD3, indicating they were reactive T cells (Fig 1C, accompanied by some CD3-positive reactive T cells. T- and B-cell
D). In 1 patient, multinucleate giant cells were seen (patient 1). clonality testing revealed no clonal lymphoid populations. The
None of the patients showed a B-cell lymphoid population (no patient was treated with a 6-week course of oral prednisolone. Four
CD20-positive cells seen). None of the patients showed infec- months later, the patient experienced headaches and confusion, with
tious agents when the samples were stained with a panel of gram, brain imaging showing a large cerebral tumor. Biopsy revealed an
periodic acideSchiff, Grocott, or ZiehleNeelsen stains. We aggressive, CD30-positive T-cell lymphoma (Fig 2E, F). The
describe 3 illustrative cases in detail to highlight the range of patient died soon after the cerebral biopsy.
clinicopathologic presentations. Patient 6: Vitritis Heralding Recurrent Hematologic
Malignancy. A 72-year-old woman with a 3-year history of
Case Reports chronic lymphocytic leukemia and immunoglobulin M k para-
proteinemia sought treatment for reduced vision in both eyes with a
Patient 3: Vitritis before the Diagnosis of a Hematologic visual acuity of hand movements in the right eye and 6/18 in the left
Malignancy. A 55-year-old woman sought treatment for a eye. Examination revealed right-sided optic disc swelling and
2-month history of debilitating floaters in both eyes but worse in the bilateral vitritis with moderate (2þ) vitreous cells (Fig 3A, B). She

592
McGrath et al 
Paraneoplastic Granulomatous Vitritis

Figure 1. A, Photomicrograph showing cytologic preparation of the vitreous washings from one of the 8 cases. This shows a granuloma (black arrow)
composed of a collection of epithelioid histiocytes (stain, hematoxylineeosin; original magnification, 400). B, Photomicrograph from the same case
showing dispersed epithelioid histiocytes (broad arrow) and numerous small lymphocytes (slender arrows; stain, hematoxylineeosin; original
magnification, 400). C, Photomicrograph showing positive brown staining of the central granuloma and the dispersed epithelioid histiocytes (immu-
nohistochemical agent, CD68; original magnification, 400). D, Photomicrograph showing positive brown staining of the small lymphocytes, indicating
reactive T cells (immunohistochemical agent, CD3; original magnification, 400).

underwent a right-sided core vitreous tap that was acellular and then Patient 9: Vitritis Heralding Metastatic Adenocarci-
was referred to the Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service for further noma. An 84-year-old woman sought treatment for floaters and
management. On further examination, the right disc swelling was blurred vision in both eyes. The patient had an unremarkable past
confirmed and thought to be an infiltrative optic neuropathy caused ocular history. Ophthalmic examination revealed corrected visual
by chronic lymphocytic leukemia. She underwent a left diagnostic acuity of 6/12 in the right eye and 6/18 in the left eye. Bio-
pars plana vitrectomy that showed CD68-positive granulomas and microscopic examination showed mild (1þ) inflammation and
dispersed epithelioid histiocytes, accompanied by some CD3- bilateral vitreous syneresis with moderate (2þ) clumped cells
positive reactive T cells. There was no evidence of a B-cell popu- (Fig 4AeC). Specific blood tests ruled out concurrent
lation in the vitreous (no CD20-positive cells) and no evidence of rheumatologic disease. Two months after presentation, the patient
atypical lymphoid infiltrate. After a 2-week period of watching and underwent a right diagnostic vitrectomy to determine the cause
waiting (because of no adverse systemic symptoms), the patient of her inflammation. Cytologic analysis showed CD68-positive
demonstrated left optic disc swelling, with new left-sided parotid granulomas and dispersed epithelioid histiocytes, accompanied
lymphadenopathy and computed tomography scans showing new by some CD3-positive reactive T cells. Further immunohisto-
abdominal lymphadenopathy. High-dose steroids were commenced chemistry analysis with broad-spectrum cytokeratins (AE1AE3
followed by Rituximab (Roche Products Ltd, Hertfordshire, UK) and MNF116) showed no evidence of metastatic carcinoma. The
administration. This resulted in a dramatic resolution of the optic disc patient had a history of high-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma
swelling, reduction in the vitritis, improvement in vision, and treated with surgical resection 2 years previously. Nine months
reduction in the lymphadenopathy over a period of 3 weeks after after surgery, she showed recurrence that was treated successfully
commencing treatment. with brachytherapy. At presentation with vitritis, the patient

593
Ophthalmology Retina Volume 3, Number 7, July 2019

adenocarcinoma. The patient declined further treatment given her


disseminated disease and advanced age.

Discussion

This report presents the largest series of cases of cytologically


proven granulomatous vitritis in the context of systemic ma-
lignancy. Our series included 2 clinicopathologic groups:
cases of granulomatous vitritis that occurred before a diag-
nosis of malignancy and cases of vitritis that occurred in pa-
tients with known malignancy and that heralded recurrent or
metastatic malignancy. To date, only 6 reported cases
describing this entity have appeared in the literature.9,10 Our
series of 8 cases increases this figure to 14. Collating data from
the 14 cases identifies certain distinguishing features of
granulomatous paraneoplastic vitritis.
In keeping with the known epidemiologic features of
granulomatous conditions, paraneoplastic granulomatous
vitritis seems to be primarily a disease of older age, with all
of those who have been affected being older than 50 years
and 67% being older than 65 years of age in reported cases.
It is predominantly bilateral and presents with granuloma-
tous vitritis, with associated features including optic nerve
swelling and increased vascular permeability. Some patients
showed anterior chamber inflammation, but there were no
cases with pseudohypopyon in our series.
When the host immune system fails to clear antigenic
stimuli completely, granulomatous inflammation can arise.
This pattern of chronic inflammation consists of a micro-
Figure 2. Widefield fundus images of (A) the right eye and (B) the left eye scopic aggregation of macrophages that are transformed into
of patient 3 showing vitreous debris blurring view of retinal elements. Late- epithelioid cells, surrounded by a collar of mononuclear
phase fluorescein angiograms of (C) the right eye and (D) the left eye of leukocytes, principally lymphocytes. These immune granu-
patient 3 showing vascular permeability. Magnetic resonance imaging (E) lomas can be seen in response to infectious agents, in
T1-weighted axial and (F) T2-weighted coronal scans from patient 3 sarcoidosis (where no etiologic agent has yet been identi-
showing a mass in the left temporal lobe with associated inflammation that fied), and more rarely in patients who do not fulfill the
biopsy demonstrated to be a high-grade T-cell lymphoma. criteria for systemic sarcoidosis.
Herxheimer13 was the first to recognize sarcoid-like re-
underwent chest radiography to exclude sarcoidosis or infection. actions as a tumor-related tissue response in 1917; however,
Chest computed tomography scans showed multiple pulmonary most descriptions of this phenomenon are by Brincker8 are
metastases (Fig 4D), and biopsy confirmed metastatic endometrial dated almost 70 years later. These sarcoid-like granulomas

Figure 3. Fundus photographs from patient 6: (A) the right eye showing optic disc swelling resulting from chronic lymphocytic leukemia infiltration and
(B) the left eye showing vitreous haze resulting from the presence of cytologically proven granulomatous vitritis.

594
McGrath et al 
Paraneoplastic Granulomatous Vitritis

showed an equal spread of cases of uveitis developing in


the context of lymphoma versus in the context of
carcinoma. Given the paucity of cases with intraocular
involvement, it is difficult to estimate the frequency with
which these reactions may occur in the vitreous; however,
it is likely underdiagnosed because of underrecognition.
The prognostic differences between paraneoplastic
granulomas occurring before the diagnosis of malignancy
or those heralding recurrent or metastatic disease are not
possible to ascertain from this study given the small
number of cases involved.
The ophthalmologist is usually the first clinician from
whom the patient with paraneoplastic vitritis seeks treatment
and thus can play an important role in the early investigation
of this condition. As with other paraneoplastic syndromes,
the importance of early diagnosis and treatment cannot be
overestimated. Ophthalmologists should be alert for mas-
querades in uveitis and should consider diagnostic vitrec-
tomy in suspicious or recalcitrant cases of uveitis with no
known underlying cause. Systemic enquiry should include a
screen for other causes of intermediate and posterior uveitis,
especially sarcoidosis.
In most cases, signs and symptoms resolved with
management of the primary systemic malignancy without
the need for systemic or periocular corticosteroids. Such
treatment should be reserved for cases of recurrent or sight-
threatening intraocular inflammation.
Because pathologists will make the diagnosis of vitreous
granulomas on cytologic analysis, it is critical that they are
Figure 4. Images from patient 9: (A) right eye and (B) left eye widefield aware that vitreous granulomas can be associated with
fundus images, (C) ultrasound biomicroscopy showing vitritis (arrow), and systemic malignancy and that they suggest further in-
(D) computed tomography scan showing a right-side pulmonary metastasis vestigations, preferably in a multidisciplinary team meeting.
of endometrial adenocarcinoma (white arrow).
Failure to mention this could result in an avoidable delay in
diagnosing systemic malignancy, recurrence, or metastases.
have been seen in the context of a variety of neoplasms and In summary, ophthalmologists should maintain a high
can occur within tumors themselves, adjacent to tumors, or index of suspicion of a paraneoplastic cause in bilateral
in lymph nodes draining the neoplasm. The involved lymph posterior segment inflammation of uncertain origin pre-
nodes usually are free of metastases, although occasionally, senting for the first time in an elderly patient or heralding
granulomas may be seen in relationship to the metastatic recurrence or metastasis in known cases of malignancy. We
neoplasm.14 The cause of this reaction is postulated to be recommend in such circumstances an investigative pathway
secondary to an induced T-cellemediated host response to designed to exclude systemic malignancy or recurrence of a
soluble antigenic tumor factors.8,15 These factors either malignancy or metastasis.
may be shed by tumor cells or may be released during tumor
necrosis. They are then carried to regional lymph nodes or References
distant organs where nonnecrotizing granulomatous 1. Lawyer RA, Selhorst JB, Zimmerman LE, Hoyt WF. Blind-
inflammation ensues. Some authors also postulate that true ness caused by photoreceptor degeneration as a remote effect
sarcoidosis and sarcoid-like reactions are the clinical ex- of cancer. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;81:606e613.
tremes of a common pathologic process.16 2. Berson EL, Lessell S. Paraneoplastic night blindness with
A recent study of uveitis in the elderly found that malignant melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;106:307e311.
sarcoidosis accounted for most cases of the disease, with 3. Barr CC, Zimmerman LE, Curtin VT, Font RL. Bilateral
uveitis being diagnosed more frequently than in younger diffuse melanocytic uveal tumors associated with systemic
populations.17 However in this study, almost one third of the malignant neoplasms. A recently recognized syndrome. Arch
cases of uveitis were classified as idiopathic. It is possible Ophthalmol. 1982;100:249e255.
4. Sotodeh M, Paridaens D, Keunen J, et al. Paraneoplastic
that this group may have been harboring systemic vitelliform retinopathy associated with cutaneous or uveal
malignancy. Systemic sarcoid-like reactions have been melanoma and metastases. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd.
estimated to occur most commonly in association with 2005;222:910e914.
Hodgkin disease (up to 14%) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma 5. Aronow ME, Adamus G, Abu-Asab M, et al. Paraneo-
(7%) and less commonly in carcinomas (4%).8 Our series plastic vitelliform retinopathy: clinicopathologic

595
Ophthalmology Retina Volume 3, Number 7, July 2019

correlation and review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 12. Sheard RM, Mudhar HS. Diagnostic cellular yield is superior
2012;57:558e564. with pars plana vitrecomty compared with core vitreous bi-
6. Iannetti L, Corsi C, Iafrate F, et al. Bilateral uveitis with opsy. Eye. 2013;27:50e55.
hypopyon as a presenting symptom of metastatic peritoneal 13. Herxheimer G. Uber Karzinom und Tuberkulose. Z Tuberk.
carcinomatosis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20:948e951. 1917;27:251e258.
7. Satirtav G, Donbaloglu M, Oltulu R, et al. Unilateral recurrent 14. Burhan W, Al Rowaie Z, Rajih E, Akhtar M. Sarcoid-like
anterior uveitis as the presenting sign of bladder carcinoma. granulomatous reaction in renal cell carcinoma: report of a
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016;46:190e193. case with review of the published reports. Ann Saudi Med.
8. Brincker H. Sarcoid reactions in malignant tumours. Cancer 2013;33:614e618.
Treat Rev. 1986;13:147e156. 15. Kurata A, Terado Y, Schulz A, et al. Inflammatory cells in the
9. Mudhar HS, Fernando M, Sheard R, Rennie I. Paraneoplastic formation of tumor-related sarcoid reactions. Hum Pathol.
granulomatous vitritis and retinitis as a presentation of recur- 2005;36:546e554.
rent classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30: 16. Rohart C, Badelon I, Fajnkuchen F, et al. [Ophthalmologic
341e343. disease in sarcoid-like granulomatosis and true sarcoidosis in
10. Balasubramaniam SC, Salomao DR, Davies JB, et al. Para- immunodeficiency. Four case reports]. J Fr Ophtalmol.
neoplastic sarcoid-like reactions and the eye. Retina. 2015;35: 2008;31:683e691.
789e797. 17. Gregoire MA, Kodjikian L, Varron L, et al. Characteristics of
11. Patel DS, Khan IJ, Zayed MG, et al. Full diagnostic vitrectomy uveitis presenting for the first time in the elderly: analysis of 91
with posterior vitreous detachment induction for the diagnosis of patients in a tertiary center. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2011;19:
vitritis due to uncertain aetiology. Retina. 2018. In Press. 219e226.

Footnotes and Financial Disclosures


Originally received: December 24, 2018. No animal subjects were included in this study.
Final revision: February 25, 2019. Author Contributions:
Accepted: March 7, 2019. Conception and design: McGrath, Mudhar, Sheard, Rennie
Available online: March 14, 2019. Manuscript no. ORET_2019_71.
1 Analysis and interpretation: McGrath, Mudhar, Sheard, Spiteri-Cornish,
Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Shef- Winder, Rundle, Rennie
field, United Kingdom.
2 Data collection: McGrath, Mudhar, Sheard, Spiteri-Cornish, Winder,
National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Department of Histo-
Rundle
pathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
3 Obtained funding: N/A
Sheffield Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal
Overall responsibility: McGrath, Mudhar, Sheard
Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
4
Tasmanian Eye Clinics, Hobart, Australia. Abbreviations and Acronyms:
*Both authors contributed equally as first authors. CLL ¼ chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; DM ¼ dispersed macrophages;
EBV ¼ Epstein-Barr virus; G ¼ granulomas; MNG ¼ multinucleate giant
Financial Disclosure(s):
cells; PCR ¼ polymerase chain reaction; SL ¼ small reactive lymphocytes;
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials AC ¼ anterior chamber; F ¼ female; T ¼ time of ophthalmology pre-
discussed in this article. sentation, timing of clinical events is shown as months before (minus) or
No financial support was received for this study. after (plus); LN ¼ lymph node; M ¼ male.
HUMAN SUBJECTS: Human subjects were included in this study. The Correspondence:
Research and Development Office (equivalent of an institutional research
Hardeep S. Mudhar, FRCPath, National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology
board) of the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Hallamshire Service, Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital,
Hospital, Sheffield, UK confirmed this study was a clinical retrospective Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom. E-mail: hardeep.mudhar@sth.nhs
case review and not research. All research adhered to the tenets of the
.uk.
Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided informed consent.

596

You might also like