Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Keywords: motivation,
Motivation group work, use of L2,
Andra Candea, Malena Beamonte, Smehan Es Saheb participation
Dornyei (1997) states, group work has been recognized as a factor that positively and survey, with a majority of students expressing greater enthusiasm for collaborative
considerably contributes to students' success as well as the quality of their language learning compared to individual work. Notably, the students also exhibited:
learning. In addition, Dobao (2012) states that group interaction facilitates language Heightened interest in and use of the L2, as evidenced by their increase in
learning thus making the students' learning process more bearable. Moreover,
students that work in small groups focus more on the use of the L2 and are better at
solving language-related issues. Therefore, students working in groups are
linguistically more accurate (Dobao, 2012). According to Long (1977), students are
queries regarding the task and their utilization of the L2 to communicate with
their peers, teacher, and teacher trainees.
Does group work affect 4th-year ESO students' motivation? If so, how?
Does group work increase student participation during the tasks?
Does group work increase students' use of the L2 during the tasks?
05 Conclusion Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and
individual work. Journal of second language Writing, 21(1), 40-58.
03 Methodology
To conduct the present study, a triangulation of methods was employed, which included a survey, observation,
L2 interactions. To address this issue, the study investigated whether group work
could serve as a tool to promote students' motivation and participation during L2
lessons. The findings of the study indicated that in the three-school context where
it was conducted, group work was indeed effective in improving students'
Kerr, N.L. and Hertel, G. (2011). The Köhler Group Motivation Gain: How to Motivate the ‘Weak
Links’ in a Group. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5: 43-55.
Long, M. H. (1977). Group work in the teaching and learning of English as a foreign language—
problems and potential. ELT Journal, 31(4), 285-292.
and peer observation. In order to gather data, the research tools employed were: motivation and led to greater participation and interaction among them.
Field notes. However, it is important to note that certain limitations of the study may have
Richards, K. (2006). Language and professional identity: Aspects of collaborative interaction.
During all the lessons to track the progress of the students during the tasks. impacted the reliability of the findings:
An anonymous questionnaire (in Spanish). Springer.
The short amount of time allocated for the implementation of group work may
15 questions (1-5 Likert scale questions, multiple-choice questions and short-answer questions). have limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding the comparison
Administered at the end of the last session. between individual work and group work.
A peer-observation checklist.
The use of multiple researchers to collect field notes in different contexts may
The research enlisted the aid of peers to obtain an external perspective.
have introduced biases and inaccuracies into the data.
The peers were invited to participate in the 4th session.
Response bias from the students may have impacted the reliability of the
They observed the group's participation, performance, and use of English during the assigned tasks.
questionnaire results.
Small sample size used in this study limits the generalizability of the results to
The materials employed in the class were Learning Units that adhered to the principles of
Communicative Language Teaching (Brown, 2007; Richards, 2006) larger populations.
Tasks were developed using
Task-Based Learning principles, following a pre-task, task, and post-task sequence designed to simulate In short, our research findings have concluded that group work has been an
real-world English language usage and to promote student interaction. effective class organization tool to increase students' motivation and participation
in the selected contexts. These findings may help the EFL teachers of the schools
We kept in mind that response bias exhibited by the students may compromise the results of the survey. improve the students' motivation and participation in the classroom. For future
Response bias can manifest in a number of ways, such as socially desirable responding, inattention to the research, as some of our participants have stated that they feel better working
questions, avoidance of extreme responses, or exaggeration of answers (Sax, Gilmartin & Bryant, 2003). To alone, we believe it would be interesting to conduct some research to find a way to Access to the survey, results,
mitigate these potential limitations, we employed the peer observation checklist and our own field notes to cater for students who feel more motivated working in groups as well as those who checklist and field notes
bolster the reliability of our data. prefer to work independently.