You are on page 1of 1

E DG E

Driving for Old Dominion

O
ld Dominion Freight Line is a trucking com- would be on probation for ninety days and she would
pany that hires two kinds of drivers. “Line lose the job if she had any performance problems. No
Haul” drivers drive long distances and spend male drivers had ever been required to go through
nights and weekends on the road. “Pickup and De- a probation period. Merritt worked as a Pickup and
livery” drivers only drive locally and stay home, but Delivery driver for ninety days, and had no problems
they have to carry and stack heavy loads so their job carrying freight or doing anything else required of the
is more physically demanding. Out of 3,100 Pickup position. But seven months later, she injured her an-
and Delivery drivers in the company, only five were kle while moving boxes. Her doctor said she could not
women. Deborah Merritt worked for six years as a do Pickup and Delivery until it healed. Three months
THE

Line Haul driver, making long trips across the United later, Merritt’s ankle was well and her doctor told her
States, sometimes driving over five hundred miles a “nothing . . . prevented her from performing her duties
day. Still, she never complained and did her job well. as a Pickup and Delivery driver. . . . [Her ankle was] as
But Merritt wanted a Pickup and Delivery job so she well, if not better, . . . than before her injury.” So Mer-
would not have to spend time away from home. To ritt asked to have her Pickup and Delivery job back.
show she could do the job, she filled in for Pickup and But Brian Stoddard, Vice President of Safety and Per-
Delivery drivers when needed. Her supervisor said sonnel said that she first had to take a “physical abil-
Merritt did a good job on Pickup and Delivery and sev- ity test” that would evaluate her strength, agility, and
eral clients complimented her work. When a full-time cardiovascular endurance and have her perform the
Pickup and Delivery job finally was available, Merritt tasks of a Pickup and Delivery driver. Merritt did not
O N

told Bobby Howard, her Lynchburg, Virginia termi- pass the test; but the test had been used only rarely
nal manager, that she wanted the job. Howard said and only when hiring new people. If male employees
he did not have the authority to fill the position. But were injured while on the job, Stoddard admitted, he
later, he in fact hired someone else to take the job: a was “not necessarily going to send them for a [physi-
male driver with less truck-driving experience. Merritt cal fitness] test.” Moreover, Merritt said, she could
did not complain however. A year later, a Pickup and obviously do the job since she did it for seven months
Delivery job became available again. Again, Howard and filled in for other drivers even longer. Neverthe-
hired a less-experienced male driver. When Merritt less, Stoddard fired her because of her “inability to
asked why he passed her over twice, Howard said perform [the] job” as indicated by the test and later
it “had been discussed and it was decided that they replaced her with a male driver.
could not let a woman have that position.” He pointed
out that “the company did not really have women . . .
[Pickup and Delivery] drivers.” An Old Dominion
driver put it simply: “We don’t have no females.” 1. Was the fact that Deborah Merritt did not
Howard also told her that Old Dominion’s Regional pass the physical ability test sufficient
Vice President “was afraid [a female] would get hurt” justification for firing her? Did Old Do-
and “didn’t think a girl should have that position.” minion Freight Line discriminate unjustly
An operations manager agreed, saying “this is not a against Merritt? If you think firing her was
woman’s place.” unjust discrimination, then was it indi-
Another year passed and a Pickup and Delivery vidual or institutionalized discrimination?
job again became available. This time the company Explain your answers.
gave the position to Merritt, but told her that she

Source: Deborah Merritt v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, no. 09-1498, April 9, 2010.

398

You might also like