Hitya% Nitya Laboratories TEST REPORT OF DYNAMIC PILE LOAD TEST Name of Project 4 Laning of Jind —Gohana (Pkg: 1) Section from Km.00.000 to Km.40+601 (Project Length Kim, 40,601) of NH-352a in State of Haryana under Bharatmala Pariyojna under NH (0) to be Implemented on Hybrid Annuity Model (Ham) Client National Highway Authority of In Independent Engineer Casta Engineers Private Limited in J.V. With Sowil Limited Concessionaire Gohana Sonipat Highway Pvt.Ltd. Contractor Brij Gopal Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. Casting Date 11/02/2023 Testing Date 14/ 03/ 2023 Location of Pile CH-23-362, (Al) Pile No.03 (LHS) Report No.: NL/BLB/2303 1502 Prepared By Nitya’ Werk for Quality NITYA LABORATORIES Address: Plot No.118, Church Road, Behind Kausik Vatika, Bhagat Singh Colony, Ballabgarh, Faridabad, Delhi NCR, India Tel.: +91-129-2241021 Mobile No.: +91-981 1062878 E-Mail ID: info@nityalab.com, labsnitya@gmail.com Website: www.nityalab.com Laboratories I Faridabad (Haryana) I Jammu J&K)*} Ma age (Karnataka) 1Hitya® Nitya Laboratories ok foray INDEX Introduction .. we Pile Details z 1 2 3 Test Equipmen 4 PDA Field Testing and Results... 5 6 7 CAPWAP Analysis... Results... na Conclusion .. Annexure-A... Annexure-B PhotographNitya’. Nitya Laboratories 1. Introduetion Mis. Brij Gopal Construction Company had entrusted the work of High-Strain Dynamic ‘Testing of R.C. bored piles installed at Project “Four Lanning of Jind - Gohana Section of NH-352A. The aim of testing was to evaluate pile static capacity and measure settlement under applied load. This report presents the results of dynamic pile testing and analysis using the Pile Driving Analyzer and CAPWAP Program, The test was conducted in accordance with ASTM 4945-00 on 14/03/2023. 2. Pile Details Pile No. AI(LHS) | _ Pile no-03, Pile length below sensor, m 30.2 Pile length below Cut-off Level, m 30.0 Pile Diameter, mm 1200 Conerete Grade M35 Hammer Weight, Ton 4.5408 Cateulation as per approved os Methodology Required Hammer Weight 42MT. 1.5% of Design Load Drop Height, m Lo. Design Load, Ton 280.0 Safe Load, Ton 420.0 1stime _ Design Load Soil data ‘As Geological DataHitya%s Nitya Laboratories 3. Test Equipment A Pile Driving Analyzer™ and its associated pile top force and velocity transducers were used to conduct the dynamic pile test. ‘Two strain transducers and two accelerometers were attached to the pile head. They were mounted ‘on opposite sides of the pile to cancel bending effects during each strike of the hammer. The signals of strain and acceleration were conditioned and processed by PDA. ‘The PDA is a micro-processor-based signal conditioner and digital computer. Signals of pile top force and velocity were measured and analyzed during each strike of the pile driving hammer and stored in the Analyzer. The pile top force and velocity —time curves were displayed on laptop computer screen. Real time analogue mnals of the pile top force and velocity were also recorded using the PDA and later stored in the field computer unit. The PDA onsite uses a program based on closed form Case-Goble solutions to compute static is subsequently checked with the computer program CAPWAP to confirm the static pile capacity obtained on site. pile capacity from the pile top force and velocity data. Thi 4. PDA Field Testing Dynamic testing on the pile was conducted by striking the pile with hammer for several blows during the restriking process. During testing of the pile, complete dynamic measurements were obtained for each hammer blow delivered to the pile. ‘The PDA measures the total (static plus dynamic) resistance acting on the pile. The portion of total tes ance that is computed as static resistance by the analyzer is determined by the soil damping factor Je set into the analyzer. A more accurate independent measure of the applicable soil-damping factor was determined using a CAPWAP analysis. The values measured by the PDA on field are obtained assuming that the Pile is uniform throughout its length. Also, the soil parameters like quake and damping should be assumed during the field test. Hence the CAPWAP is mandatory for all bored piles to estimate realis soil parameters as well as pile profile. On field, PDA measures the field capacity while CAPWAP refines the field the field results and hence field capacities measured using PDA may not match with the CAPWAP analysis.Hitya%s Nitya Laboratories et or culty ‘The BETA value (Integrity Factor) indicates the pile impedance and is derived from the CAPWAP analysis. The PDA is basically used to compute capacity and the BETA factor. Particularly for bored piles may never be 100% due to inherentof installation. A BETA factor less than 60% indicates a shaft with poor integrity.Such shaft may require remedial action in the form of reduced loads, redesi ingthe cap or installation of additional pile as recommended by the design engineer. [ Integrity (BETA Factor) | Comment — 100% OK 80% - 99% Minor Defect 60% = 80% ‘Some Defect I <60% Major Defect ‘The PDA field capacity is estimated by either RMX or RSU for an assumed Je value and ‘on the assumption of uniform cross ~ section of the pile. RMX is the maximum Case — Goble Resistance (Maximum Capacity) for the assume Je value (Case Damping) at the project site. The RMX capacity generally holds good when the pile shows a reasonable movement under the load. The RSU capacity is applicable when there is very high skin friction and in most cases the pile movement is normal. Hence a more real estimate of the pile capacity is obtained from the CAPWAP analysis conducted on one typical blow at the end of testing program, 5. CAPWAP Analysis A selected PDA field recording of forces and velocity data for a blow delivered tothe piles was further analyzed using the CAPWAP (Case Pile Wave Analysis Program) computer software. ‘The analysis involved applying the measured pile top velocity time record to the top of a lumped- mass and spring wave equation model of the pile. ‘The program computes the pile top force-time record and this is then compared to the actual measured force- time record. The pile and soil resistance model are then adjusted in an iterative procedure until good match is obtained between measured and computed forces. The pile and soil models can then be used to determine the estimated static load- settlement curve. ‘The CAPWAP capacities are ultimate values. They must be reduced by means of an appropriate factor of safety to yield a design or workingload. The results of CAPWAP analysis for a typical blow is briefly summarized in Annexure-A.Hlitya®s Nitya Laboratories ik foray 6. Results ‘The CAPWAP analysis results showed that pile had achieved of First Drop 1.0 Load achieved 489 tons at the time of testing. The capacity is applicable at the time of testing and further soil strength changes with time had to be considered. The CAPWAP results showed that the maximum compressive stress experiencedby the pile at the hammer impact was about 4.5 N/mm?. This stress is within allowable i was observed to be OK. its. The From CAPWAP analysis, the pile top load vs. settlement curve is obtained by simulating stati load test. The pile top settlement at 555 Tons (equivalent test load for static test) is estimated to be around 3 mm. Please refer to st jc analysis in Annexure A. 7. Conclusion 1. The CAPWAP analysis results for Pile showed that it had achieved an activated capacity of 555.0 Tons at the time of testing which is more thanthe required Test Load of 420.0 Tons. 2. The stresses in the pile were within the acceptable limits during any stage of testing. 3. The pi integrity was observed OK. 4, This report has been prepared as per guidelines given in ASTM D4945. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. ‘The findings provided in this report are based on the result of the i ividual pile tested andinformation made available to us. Note: 1. The Results given in this report are based on the test conducted at site asper relevant Code. T representative of Customer / Owner / Contractor during the site work. report only represents for Site / Test Location, which indicated, to us by 2. The report shall not reproduce or cannot be produced for any court of law without written approval of the laboratory.Witya® Nitya Laboratories ok for ualty Annexure-A. Client + National Highway Authority of India (Ministry of Road Transport & Highway) Independent Engineer: Casta Engineers Private Limited in J.V. With Sowil Limited Contractor + Brij Gopal Construction Company. Location + Ch.23+362 AI Pile no.03 LHS Testing Date + 14-03-2023 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS Pile No. Pile-03 | Required /PermissibleLimits ‘Activated pile eapacity in Ton 355.0 1.5 x Design Load ‘Skin Friction in Ton 246.5 = End Bearing in Ton 2126 ei Factor of Safety 13 AS Per IS -2911 (IV) Sale Pile Capacity in Ton 420.0 Total Displacement 3.0 ‘Compressive Stress in Nimm* 40 ‘Max 0.85fek “Tensile Stress in Nima? 103 ‘Max 0.12Fek (80% - 99% Classified as Pile Integrity (Below Sensor Level) oK minor defect)Hitya%s Nitya Laboratories io ruaiyy Date of testing: - 14/03/2023 CAPHAP SUMMARY RESULTS ‘Total CAPWAP Capacity: 4590.2; along Shaft 2486.2; at Toe 2104.0 lat Soil Dist. Depth Ra Force Sun (Unit = Unit «Quake ‘Sgmt ‘Below Below in Pile of Resist. Resist. Wo. Gages Grade Ru (Depth) (Area) = = vat vat sat a/m kea = 2 fee ata) ata ara) ee ara) 20.56 1.0 gee tale re) as0'o a sors) 36.81 1.0 300 7a 70 167.5 8 669.4 18.68 1.0 495 84 220.2 7 889.5 24.55 1.0 S19 11.7 180.0 .7 1069.5, 20.08 1.0 (ee ala cle reno) fe 32a14 18.06 0.9 few isle 1 uists) vass'e 0 1465.2 26.08 0.8 e@ 19.0 018.9 a 7 1546.5 9.07 0.9 9 24 2.2 186.8 9 1733.3, 20.84 0.9 wo 23.8 23.6 399.0 9 2132.3 44.50 0.9 ee rr 0 2486.2 39.47 0.9 avg. shatt 226.0 95.62 25.36 0.9 08 2104.0 1260.35 1.0 Soil Mode Paraneters/Extensions Shaft ‘smith Damping Factor 1.78 case Damping Factor 0.43, Damping Type Viscous Unloading Quake (% of Loading quake) 30 Reloading Level (8 of Ba) 100 Unloading Level (8 of Ra) 20 CAPWAP match quality = (Wave Up Match) ; RSA = 0 Observed: Final set = 1.0mm; Blow Count. = =~ 1000 b/m Computed: Final set = 0.2mm; Blow Count = = 9999 b/m PS (0176) CAL: 248.57 RF: 2-00) FO (49D) CAL: 169.8) RE:W1.00 [AG (E5790) CAL: 360; RF: 1.00; AT (RSBIO) CAL: 367; RF: 1.00, max. Top Comp. Stress = 4.7 MPa (T= 24.1 me, max= 1.008 x Top) max. Comp. Stress = 47 we ae 2m, Te 24.1 ms) max. Tens. Stress 02 MPa (= 0.3 m, T= 37.0 ms) max. Energy (E100) = 4.6 m3; max, Measured Top Displ. (OMK)= 1.5 mmWitya%s Nitya Laboratories ok for ua Pile Dist. max ins ma eres Sgant Below Force = Feree © Comp. Tons. ‘Trnst. No. Gages Stress Stress Energy = Yat at wpa Mea i 1 0.3 5287.1 -1188.7 7-12.02 as 2 0.7 5290.3. -1158.2 7 1.02 46 ‘ 2.0 5302.9 ~1155.5 7 1.02 as 10 3.4 5081.2 1091.4 as -0.97 a3 14 4.8 5107.5 1097.0 as -0.97 43 18 6.1 4701.6 -980.8 42 -0.87 3.8 22 758 4532.4 -927.2 40 0.82 3.6 26 8.8 4583.0 -936.5 a1 0.83 3.6 2010.2 4337.8 -365.8 3.8 -0.77 34 3411.6 4385.0 -875.6 3.90.77 34 3812.9 4190.6 -819.2 37 0.72 3.1 3 aas2a 019.7 3.7 0.72 3a 46 15.6 4054.6 760.5 3.6 0.67 29 5017.0 3772.5 -670.3, 3.3 -0.59 26 54 18.3. 3794.2 -659.9 34-058 26 se 19.7 3705.3 ~619.4 3.3 -0.55 25 62 1 3720.1 608.3 33 70.84 2.5 66 4 2 528.4 32 0.47 23 0 3505.8 -517.1 a2 0.46 23 ™ 3007.1 -366.3 2.7 0.32 18 n 3026.0 ~363.9 27 0.32 1s Absolute ar -1.02 case MerHoD = aE aE aE LE LL aL RP 36513261 2911-2540 «2170-1800 14291089 see 318 x 4252 3052 «3452-3051 2651. ««2251«1900 «159713261055, RU 2977 -2539«-2102,-«1664 «1226 «788381 ° ° ° Ray = 0 (an; RAZ = 3937 Om Current CAPWAP Ru = 4590 (KM) ; Corresponding J(RP)= 0.00; J(FX) = 0.00 woe VP so VTez FT]. MSDN SET = EUS, KE, w/e ome Rm mm mK 0.35 22.64 3629 «3716 «5572-15 «1.01.0 4.7 34S 204 PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL Depth Tee Eodaius Spec. Weight Porin, = 2 Mea am = 0.0 1.33 4473.8 23.563 3.77 26.2 2.33 3473.8 23.563 a7 ‘Toe Area 1.33 =ilitya%s Nitya Laboratories Date of testing: - 14/03/2023 Segant Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Perin, Wave mumber 8.6. change Slack EE. Speed min/s 8mm a ows 2 0.3.—«-2616.5 -74.6 0.00 0.000 -0.00 0.000 3.77 3787.8 2 0.7 10293.3 0.0 0.000.000 -0.00 9,000 3.77 3787.8 77 26.2 10283.3 0.0 0.000.000 0.00 0.000 3.77 3787.8, Wave Speed: Pile Top 3787.8, Elastic 3787.8, Overall 3787.8 m/s Pile Damping 2.00 8 otal volune: 29.300 a’: Volume ratio considering added impedance: 0.990 Time (ms) 0.0 Tine Incr 0.005 STATIC AUALYSTS Step Ho. Top Load ‘top Disp oe Disp. a Ss mm ° 0.0 0.0 82 nea 0.0 166 232.1 00 246 348.2 0.0 328 460.2 on 20 580.3 on 492 696.4 oa 574 e124 on 656 928.5 on 28 1046.5 on 220 aaso.6 02 302 3276.7 02 988 3392.7 02 1066 1508.6 02 ane 1623.6 0.2 3232 73914 02 ai 3055.2 03 1406 1970.4 0.3 as? 2085.5 03 1582 2200.8 0.3 682 2316.7 03 1797 2431.9 0:3 1308 2547.2 oa 2028 2662.3 0 ase 2071.7 oa 2201 2092.9 oa 2434 3008.4 os 3123.8 0.5 za 3238.6 os 2905 3353.4 0.6 3077 3460.4 0.6 3257 3563.4 0.6 10Nitya’. Nitya Laboratories Date of testing: - 03/03/2023 STATIC ANALYSIS Monotonie D-Toe, E-P R-Toe Step Wo. Top Lead ‘top Diep. ‘toe toad toe Diep. tt = es == 3446 25 1393.0 0.7 3645 26 2473.5 07 3ese 27 1556.6 0.7 4086 2 1639.0 oe 4331 29 3720.1 oe 4596 3.0 2799.1 0.9 4985 32 1674.9 0.9 5205 33 1946.2 1.0 5566 34 2010.7 aa 5980 35 2063.8 aa 634s 36 2092.3 12 este 26 2100.7 13 6656 37 2103.0 13 nz 37 2103.6 a3 e740 3.7 2103.8 13 6754 3.7 2103.8 13 76 3.7 2103.8 13 6765 a7 2103.8 13 e167 27 2104.0 13 an 3 2104.0 aa 7987 39 2104.0 as 9597 ao 2io4.o aa 9207 az 2104.0 ae 9817 a3 1s 0427 a4 2.0 31037 as 22 a1s0s a6 22 aa7a9 a6 23 21056 an 23 nsie ar 23 31943 ar 23 asse an 23 11965 ar 23 11969 a7 23 asm an 23 32055 a6 23 32137 as 23 229 as 23 32301, aa 22 32383 a4 22 azees a3 22 a2se7 42 22 2629 42 22 ana an 2a 32793 ao 23 12875 a0 2aWityas Nitya Laboratories ik for uly Date of testing: - 03/03/2023 STATIC ANALYSIS Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe Step Wo. ‘Top Load, ‘op Disp, Toe Load ‘Toe Disp. at =m a . 12987 3197.5 3.9 2 22 13038 3081.6 3.9 ia 2a asiza 2966.6 38 9 2a asi91 2869.9 3.7 6 2a 13226 2822.2 3.7 5 2a asa 2797.9 3.7 2 22 33253 2785.8 37 6 2a 13257 2780.4 37 9 2a 13259 27.7 37 a 2a 13260 2716.4 37 7 2a 13261 2775.0 37 3 2a 13348 2660.0 3.6 2 2.0 13438 2544.7 3.5 2.0 13832 2428.9 35 2.0 13620 2313.4 24 2.0 13733 ziga.1 3.3 20 382 2083.3 3.2 18 13959 1967.7 322 Le 14084 1952.2 3a 1 342n7 1736.7 3.0 19 14357 1621.5 29 1 14504 1506.4 2 Le 14659 3391.3 27 2 aasaa 1276.0 26 1 1491 1160.6 25 7 15168 1045.8 24 17 15354 930.7 23 1.7 15549 815.7 22 Le 15756 700.7 2.0 Le 15979 588.0 19 1s ae21e 479.9 18 1s 16475 377.7 17 at 16755 282.5 16 14 1317063 195.6 1s 13 37409 119.7 1.3 1.3 37802 57.6 12 12 18263 14.8 La aaHitya%s Nitya Laboratories ke fru Annexure-B Upward travelling wave signal matching of Routine Pile 13Nitya’ Nitya Laboratories ik for ay tm Saas ured Free, velocity imp Upm: Wave a evel 0.000 Force x Velocity Impedance Graph of Routine Pile (cross section {m2} Depth tm) Cross Section Area of Pile showing No defect in the Pile throughout the length 4Nitya Laboratories hitya’s