Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Curriculum Program
Course 919 | Edition 2020
TAXATION
Module 9: Taxation
CFP designation holders are highly regarded for their ability to provide
clients with comprehensive financial planning services. They put clients’
interests first and ensure clients’ financial needs and objectives are being
met through the financial planning process.
ii
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
CFP®, Certified Financial Planner® and are trademarks owned by Financial Planning
Standards Board Ltd. (FPSB) and used under license. All other trademarks are those of FP
Canada™.
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized reproduction of any images or content without permission is prohibited.
iii
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Acknowledgements
First Edition, 2020
Authored by:
iv
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Module Requirements
For more information on the requirements of this module (course outline,
instructions and assessments), please refer to the Syllabus, accessible
from the module homepage of the learning environment.
v
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Table of Contents
LEARNING OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 10
Defining taxation ............................................................................ 10
RELATIONSHIPS ............................................................................. 25
Definition of spouse ........................................................................ 25
Overview ........................................................................................ 27
Non-arm’s length ............................................................................. 28
Related ........................................................................................... 29
vi
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Emigrating ...................................................................................... 35
Immigrating .................................................................................... 36
Non-resident ................................................................................... 39
Taxing authority ............................................................................. 40
Individuals ...................................................................................... 47
Corporations ................................................................................... 48
vii
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Trusts............................................................................................. 48
Deceased taxpayer........................................................................... 52
Partner in a partnership .................................................................... 54
Corporation ..................................................................................... 55
Trust .............................................................................................. 55
Assessment ..................................................................................... 58
Notice of Assessment ....................................................................... 58
Reassessment ................................................................................. 61
Notice of Objection ........................................................................... 61
Requirements .................................................................................. 62
Penalties ......................................................................................... 65
Introduction ................................................................................... 70
Income tax framework ................................................................... 70
Canada caregiver amount for infirm dependants under age 18 ............ 217
CPP/QPP contributions through employment and self-employment ....... 217
x
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
xv
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Table 3: How the Fair Market Value Affects the Allowable Capital Loss .......... 23
Table 12: 2019 Federal Personal Tax Brackets and Rates....................... 209
Figure 9: Basic Federal Tax ................................................................ 236
xvi
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
xvii
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Learning Objectives
This module addresses the key knowledge candidates require to
understand and interpret an individual’s tax profile, including being able to
explain and identify the income tax rules, as well as the implications for
various types of income. The module also explores tax deductions and
credits, as well as the benefits of engaging in income splitting.
The first section introduces taxation. It defines key terms, outlines the
impact of taxation on income and consumption, and explains the factors
affecting income tax.
The second section defines various relationships as they relate to income tax.
The fourth section explains key elements of the personal tax system and
its application, and how income tax is calculated.
The sixth section discusses capital cost allowance, including the principles
of the capital cost allowance system, the capital cost allowance classes,
key formulas, the first-year rule, short taxation years and the disposition
of depreciable property.
1
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The eighth section examines income splitting with respect to its suitability,
pension income splitting, Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension Plan
sharing, spousal Registered Retirement Savings Plans, Tax-Free Savings
Accounts, Registered Education Savings Plans and Registered Disability
Savings Plans.
The final section discusses taxation for First Nations People in Canada.
After completing the coursework for this module, the learner will be able to:
Explain the factors that may affect income taxes, such as:
Liquidity of assets
Sources of income
Family circumstances
Business interests
Government legislation
Federal taxes
Provincial/territorial taxes
A factual resident
A deemed resident
A non-resident
As a factual resident
As a deemed resident
As a non-resident
Involuntary
Voluntary
Taxation
Calculate the capital gain and taxable capital gain resulting from the
disposition of capital property, including:
Personal-use property
Other property
Calculate the capital loss and allowable capital loss resulting from the
disposition of capital property, including:
Personal-use property
Other property
Estimate the income tax impact of dividend income received from the
following:
A Canadian corporation
A trust
Estimate the tax impact of claiming a federal tax deduction or credit for
the following:
Students
Employees
Seniors
Of a tax deduction
Estimate the tax impact of claiming a federal tax deduction or credit for
individuals
6
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Estimate the potential income tax impact that may occur due to the
transfer of property:
Evaluate how each of the following factors may affect the suitability of
splitting income with students, using registered plans, with seniors and
with individuals with disability:
Marginal tax rate differential between the taxpayer and student, tax
payer and annuitant, tax payer and spouse, and tax payer and
individual with a disability:
In current year
Impact on net taxes paid by the taxpayer and student, tax payer and
annuitant, tax payer and spouse, and tax payer and individual with a
disability
7
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Explain how income for a First Nations person (“Indian” according to the
Canada Revenue Agency and the Indian Act) is treated for tax
purposes:
Explain how purchases made by a First Nations person are treated for
tax purposes:
9
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Introduction
Defining taxation
The term taxation refers to the compulsory charge a government levies
against sources such as income or profits. The charge could also be a levy
added to the cost of goods and services or a transaction. The terms
assessment, charge, duty, excise amount or fee may be used
interchangeably for some types of compulsory charges the government
applies to generate revenue to finance its expenditures on services or pay
government obligations.
Income tax
Income tax is a tax the federal and provincial governments levy on income
that individuals, corporations and trusts earn. Individuals may be subject
to tax, for example, on income sources such as employment earnings,
business income and investment earnings including dividend income,
interest income and gains on the disposition of capital property.
Corporations may be subject to tax on income sources such as business
10
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
income, dividends and interest income. Canadians are obligated to pay the
tax governments levy on earned income.
Some provinces integrate their sales tax with the federal GST. Where there
is integration of the federal GST and provincial sales tax, the term HST is
used to refer to the combined taxes, and typically mirrors the application
of GST but at a combined rate. The Canada Revenue Agency handles
administration of both GST and HST.
For example, the HST rate in Ontario is 13%, representing 5% GST and
8% provincial sales tax.
Three provinces continue to retain a separate retail sales tax and the
supporting department responsible for administration of the provincial
sales tax (British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Manitoba). In these three
provinces, the GST and PST are applied according to separate and unique
sets of rules.
11
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Excise tax
In Canada, excise duties are charged on products that fall within the scope
of tobacco, wine, beer, spirits and cannabis products. When these goods
are manufactured in Canada, the excise duty tax is payable on the value of
the good at the point of packaging rather than at the point of sale.
Alternatively, when these goods are imported into Canada, the duty tax is
payable by the importer at the time they are imported.
Property tax
Municipalities in Canada levy a property tax on the estimated market value
of real property within their boundaries. Owners of the property receive an
annual assessment for property taxes from the respective municipality.
Some municipalities charge a separate business tax to the occupants of
business-occupied premises.
12
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
There are three basic income taxation structures: progressive, flat and
surtax.
13
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Progressive structure
Canada uses a progressive tax rate structure to tax the income of
individuals whereby individuals pay a marginally higher percentage of
income tax as their income increases. The progressive system uses
brackets to adjust the amount of tax payable at each level of earnings. The
federal income tax brackets begin at 15% of taxable income and increase
to a top rate of 33%.
On top of the federal brackets, each province has a set of income tax
brackets that, similar to the federal rate structure, imposes a tax rate that
increases as an individual’s taxable income increases. This means
individuals pay two levels of income tax: one at the federal level, based on
the federal government’s set of progressive brackets, and another at the
provincial level, based on a separate set of brackets established by the
province in which the individual resides.
Flat structure
A flat income tax rate structure is one where everyone pays the same
percentage of income tax, regardless of how much he or she earns. In a
flat structure, there are no brackets; instead, one single rate of tax applies
to every dollar of taxable income.
Surtax
Another common application for imposing additional income tax is a
surtax. A surtax is an additional tax imposed in addition to the basic tax
payable. From time to time, the federal and some provincial governments
use surtaxes as a means by which to charge an additional income tax
14
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The examples that follow use the 2019 federal tax brackets, a progressive
tax rate structure, to illustrate these concepts.
15
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Figure 1 illustrates these federal tax brackets, showing both the marginal
and average tax rates for different taxable incomes.
Recall that a taxpayer has both a marginal tax rate and an average tax
rate.
The marginal tax rate represents the amount of tax due on the next dollar
earned and is useful for analyzing such things as the amount of income
taxes due on additional income or the amount of tax saved by contributing
to an RRSP. For example, if John’s marginal tax rate is 20%, he will pay
tax at a rate of 20% on each additional dollar of income beyond his current
level of income. If John earns an additional $1,000 of regular income, he
will pay an additional $200 in taxes (20% marginal tax rate). Similarly, if
John contributes $1,000 to an RRSP, it will lower John’s taxable income by
$1,000, resulting in a tax savings of $200 (20% marginal tax savings).
16
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The average tax rate, representing the ratio of total taxes divided by total
taxable income, is useful for estimating an individual’s total tax liability
given a certain amount of income.
Using the federal tax brackets above and adding the relevant provincial tax
brackets, these two examples examine the tax liability for Cameron and
Samantha, two individuals with different levels of taxable income.
EXAMPLE 1
If Cameron’s taxable income is $85,000 for 2019, he is subject to federal income tax
payable of $14,805, derived as follows:
15% on the first $47,630 of taxable income = $7,145, plus
20.5% on taxable income between $47,630 and $85,000 = $7,661
Cameron’s total federal income tax payable is $14,805 ($7,145 + $7,661) on taxable
income of $85,000. Cameron’s federal marginal tax rate is 20.5%, and his federal
average tax rate is 17.4%.
If Cameron resides in British Columbia, his provincial income tax liability is:
5.06% on the first $40,707 of taxable income = $2,060, plus
7.7% on the next $40,709 of taxable income = $3,135, plus
10.5% on the next $3,584 of taxable income = $376
Cameron’s total provincial income tax payable is $5,571 ($2,060 + $3,135 + $376).
Cameron’s total income taxes are $20,376, his marginal tax rate is 31%, and his
average tax rate is 24%.
17
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE 2
If Samantha’s taxable income is $225,000 for 2019, she is subject to federal income
tax payable of $53,546, derived as follows:
Samantha’s total federal income tax payable is $53,547 ($7,145 + $9,763 + $13,627 +
$18,184 + $4,828) on total taxable income of $225,000. Samantha’s federal marginal
tax rate is 33%, and her federal average tax rate is 23.8%.
Samantha’s total income taxes are $88,776, her marginal tax rate is 50.4%, and her
average tax rate is 39.5%.
18
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The effective marginal tax rate for a capital gain is 50% of the marginal
tax rate, because the capital gain inclusion rate is 50%. For example, if an
individual is in the 50% marginal tax bracket, his or her effective marginal
tax rate on a capital gain is 25%.
The effective marginal tax rate for dividends is far more complicated,
because of the gross-up factors and corresponding dividend tax credit.
Table 1 presents four unique scenarios in which different individuals
receive a $1,000 cash dividend. The $1,000 dividend paid to individuals A
and B is an eligible dividend, whereas the $1,000 dividend paid to
individuals C and D is a non-eligible dividend. Individuals A and C are in
the 35% marginal tax bracket, and individuals B and D are in the 50%
marginal tax bracket.
19
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
20
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The effective marginal tax rate is significantly different from the marginal
tax rate for the individuals in the table. This is because dividends are
subject to a special tax regime that involves the dividend gross-up and
dividend tax credit. As such, the marginal tax rate does not reflect the true
tax liability of an additional dividend; it is the effective marginal tax rate
that accurately reflects the special tax treatment of dividends.
1
Government of Canada, Canada Revenue Agency, “Information Circular 89-3: Policy
Statement on Business Equity Valuations,” paragraph 3(a)
21
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The adjusted cost base of a capital property is used to calculate any capital
gain (or capital loss) arising on the disposition of the property. A capital
gain is derived as the difference between the fair market value of the
property and the adjusted cost base of the property. The higher a
property’s adjusted cost base, the lower the capital gain and ultimately the
tax liability arising from the disposition (i.e. sale) of the property.
Similarly, the lower the property’s adjusted cost base, the higher the
capital gain and ultimate tax liability arising from the disposition.
Table 2 assumes the fair market value of the property (a piece of land)
remains constant at $250,000, while the adjusted cost base of the
property is changed to show the effect of a higher and lower adjusted cost
base.
Table 2: How the Adjusted Cost Base Affects the Taxable Capital Gain
Asset Fair Market Adjusted Capital Gain Taxable
Value Cost Base (FMV less ACB) Capital Gain
(50% of capital
gain)
Example 1 $250,000 $125,000 $125,000 $62,500
Example 2 – $250,000 $100,000 $150,000 $75,000
lower ACB
Example 3 – $250,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000
higher ACB
Tax rates are applied against the taxable capital gain. In Table 2, because
the fair market value is held constant, you can see that changes to the
adjusted cost base affect the capital gain in each example. In example 2,
the lower adjusted cost base increases the capital gain and taxable capital
gain, resulting in a higher overall income tax liability associated with the
disposition of the property. Similarly, increasing the adjusted cost base
reduces the capital gain and taxable capital gain, resulting in a lower
overall income tax liability.
22
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Table 3: How the Fair Market Value Affects the Allowable Capital Loss
Property Fair Market Adjusted Capital Loss Allowable
Value Cost Base (FMV less Capital Loss
ACB) (50% of
capital loss)
Example 1 $150,000 $200,000 ($50,000) ($25,000)
Example 2 – $100,000 $200,000 ($100,000) ($50,000)
lower FMV
Example 2 – $175,000 $200,000 ($25,000) ($12,500)
higher FMV
If there is no taxable capital gain for the allowable capital loss to offset,
the current year’s allowable capital loss can be carried forward indefinitely
to offset taxable capital gains in future years. Note that this is intended as
a simple example and that the implications associated with the death of a
taxpayer or a testamentary disposition are beyond the scope of the current
discussion.
23
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Liquidity of assets
The term liquidity, in a financial context, refers to the ease with which and
timeframe within which an asset can be converted into cash. Cash is
considered the most liquid asset. Shares of a private company would
typically be at the opposite end of the continuum, as they are far less
liquid. It would typically require a specific and unique buyer to turn the
shares into cash. Stocks and bonds that trade on the open market tend to
be more liquid than private company shares, as they can be turned into
cash but are subject to market conditions at the time of disposition.
Taxpayers must pay their tax liabilities when due, and as such require
sufficient liquid assets to pay any liability. The ability to pay taxes when
due is an ongoing planning consideration for both living and deceased
taxpayers.
24
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Relationships
Definition of spouse
Many aspects of the Income Tax Act refer to a spouse or common-law
partner of the taxpayer. In doing so, very specific definitions are utilized
with regards to relationships and the breakdown of those relationships. For
this reason, a review of the definitions of a spouse or common-law partner
is important. Table 4 summarizes these definitions.
Definition of
Terminology Definition of Common-law Partner
Spouse
* Note: Separations of fewer than 90 days do not affect the 12-month period.
25
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Definition of child
In a number of places throughout the Income Tax Act, reference is made
to the phrase child of the taxpayer. The term child is defined as outlined
below, unless otherwise noted:
The term dependent child will differ depending on the circumstances and
the tax issue at hand. Typically, a dependent child is considered one who
meets all of the following three conditions:
The child is, in law or in fact, under the taxpayer’s custody and control
26
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Overview
Relationships, for income tax purposes, can involve people, corporations
and trusts. Throughout the Act, the term person is used regularly;
however, the term cannot be interpreted using the simple dictionary
definition. Instead, the word person is a defined term that includes an
individual, a corporation, and a trust.
The Income Tax Act pays special attention to transactions that take place
between parties who are considered not to be dealing at arm’s length.
Notice the terminology –not to be dealing at arm’s length. In other words,
they are considered to be non-arm’s length. There are anti-avoidance rules
throughout the Income Tax Act based on relationships, but there is also
favorable tax treatment that is dependent on relationships.
The Income Tax Act uses a series of terms to specifically define different
types of relationships. Depending on the transaction, there may be
restrictions or enhancements based on the relationship of the parties
involved in the transaction. Relationships, from an income tax perspective,
can be viewed as a series of concentric circles. The most encompassing
circle is non-arm’s length relationships.
27
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Non-arm’s length
The term non-arm’s length is not directly defined within the Income Tax
Act. Rather, it is defined indirectly through the definition of arm’s length, a
term discussed above. For example, related persons are deemed not to
deal with each other at arm’s length. In general terms, a taxpayer and a
personal trust are deemed non-arm’s length if the taxpayer, or any person
not dealing at arm’s length with the taxpayer, would be beneficially
interested in the trust (with some exceptions).
28
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Related
The term related is defined in the Income Tax Act for income tax purposes.
Individuals are considered related when they are connected in any of the
following circumstances:
Blood relationship
Adoption
The Income Tax Act specifically defines the phrase blood relationship and,
as Figure 2 shows, it is not the usual dictionary definition. In general
terms, an individual is related to his or her direct ascendants (i.e., parents,
grandparents and great-grandparents), direct descendants (i.e., children,
grandchildren and great-grandchildren), siblings (i.e., sisters, brothers and
their spouses), spouse or common-law partner, and siblings of the
individual’s spouse or common-law partner.
29
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Jane, age 33, is the daughter of Tom and Hilda. Jane is married to Sam, and they
have a two-year-old son, Terry. Jane’s only sibling is Micky, who is married to Sarah.
Micky and Sarah have one child, Shannon, age one.
30
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
31
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Residency of a taxpayer
Canada imposes tax on the dual basis of residency and income source. As
such, it taxes residents of Canada on their worldwide income and non-
residents on income earned in Canada. This means analyzing if an
individual is considered resident in Canada for tax purposes is the start for
determining if Canadian taxes may apply.
Resident of Canada
Under Canadian tax law, a resident in Canada includes an individual who
normally or ordinarily resides in Canada (factual resident) and an
individual who is deemed a resident of Canada by statute (deemed
resident).
The Income Tax Act does not define the term ‘ordinarily resident’ in
Canada; rather, the definition has evolved through common law principles.
Generally, individuals who ordinarily live in Canada are considered a
resident of Canada and are referred to as factual residents. Factual
residents are subject to tax in Canada on their worldwide income for the
taxation year.
32
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The answer to both questions depends totally on the facts specific to the
given situation. The Canada Revenue Agency publishes a folio2 in which it
sets out the criteria it uses when determining an individual’s residency. A
series of primary and secondary factors developed through common law
principles is used to establish if an individual has residential ties to
Canada.
Primary factors
While not an exhaustive list, the primary factors include:
The dwelling place, owned or leased, normally occupied by the
individual
33
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Secondary factors
Even if a taxpayer’s situation appears to indicate non-residency based on
the primary factors, the Canada Revenue Agency looks at a group of
secondary factors on a collective basis. It is unusual for any single
secondary factor to determine residency status, but evidence of several
factors may tip the scale in the determination.
A Canadian passport
34
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
A taxpayer who wants to break tax ties with Canada may want to close all
Canadian bank accounts, cancel his or her driver’s license, sell any
automobiles, and cancel any golf or other memberships, to avoid the
additional accumulation of secondary factors.
Emigrating
Canadian residents do not become non-residents unless they sever all
significant residential ties upon leaving Canada. For example, a Canadian
who accepts a job in a foreign country and leaves the country with his or
her family may still be considered a Canadian resident while abroad. If the
family maintains their residential ties to Canada during the period of
absence, they are subject to Canadian tax on worldwide income.
35
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
There are steps that can be taken by the individual to indicate a complete
sever of residency, often referred to as a clean break. In addition to the
primary and secondary factors, this would include the payment of the tax
liability arising, or posting of acceptable security, with respect to the tax
consequences arising from the deemed disposition of all property upon
departure. The deemed disposition and addressing the resulting tax
consequences would be a strong indication to the Canada Revenue Agency
of the individual's intention to permanently sever residential ties with
Canada at the time of departure.
Immigrating
The primary and secondary factors are also used to determine if a non-
resident becomes resident in Canada at any time in a taxation year. When
a non-resident is assessed, based on the criteria, to have become resident
36
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The point in time when residency begins based on the factors is referred to
as a fresh start. That individual will be non-resident for the period in the
year leading up to the fresh-start but will be a part-time resident of
Canada for the part of the taxation year following the fresh start. The
individual is a part-time resident of Canada and subject to tax on his or her
worldwide income for the portion of the taxation year following the fresh
start. In the subsequent taxation year, the individual will be an ordinary
resident of Canada for the full taxation year, assuming nothing in his or
her circumstances changes.
Part-time resident
Individuals immigrating to or emigrating from Canada are typically
assessed as part-time residents of Canada for the year in which they arrive
or depart. Individuals who immigrate and become resident in Canada are
subject to a part-time residence status in the year they arrive. The point in
time when they arrive creates a fresh start and is the point from which
residency is measured for the taxation year.
37
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Canada. During the part year the individual is non-resident, his or her tax
obligation to Canada is the same as any other non-resident.
Deemed resident
Canada has a deeming rule under which individuals who sojourn or visit
Canada for a total of 183 or more days (not necessarily consecutively)
during the year are deemed to be Canadian residents. In most situations,
once an individual has spent 183 days in Canada, he or she is resident for
tax purposes and subject to Canadian tax on worldwide income for the full
taxation year.
Confusion may arise when individuals think that they will not be
considered Canadian residents until at least 183 days have passed. This is
not true. The 183-day period relates to the deeming rule for sojourning
purposes only. Individuals who make a fresh start in Canada, and quickly
develop residential ties to Canada, will be considered residents of Canada
when those ties are developed, even if that occurs long before 183 days
have elapsed. The 183-day rule applies only to individuals who have not
established residential ties to Canada but have spent more than 183 days
in the country during a taxation year.
Dual resident
Under Canadian tax law, it is possible for an individual to be a resident of
more than one country for tax purposes. In the case of dual residency,
Canada has signed tax treaties with many different countries that mediate
ultimate residency for tax purposes. Each treaty contains a tie-breaker rule
38
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Permanent dwelling
Habitual abode
Citizenship
Similar rules apply with respect to Canada’s tax treaties with other
countries.
Non-resident
Canada also taxes non-residents on the income they earn in Canada. Non-
residents are everyone who is neither a factual nor deemed resident. Non-
residents are taxed under both Part I and Part XIII of the Income Tax Act.
Employment earnings
they meet the qualifying criteria but on a pro-rata basis comparing their
Canadian income to their worldwide income.
Under Part XIII of the Income Tax Act, non-residents must pay a basic
withholding tax of 25% on income earned in Canada from such sources as
management fees, interest, estate and trust income, rents, royalties, and
pension benefits. The 25% rate can be lower depending on the treaty that
Canada has with the country in which the non-resident taxpayer resides.
This withholding tax could be considered a flat tax.
Parts I and XIII of the Income Tax Act are supposed to be mutually
exclusive and, therefore, do not apply to the same types of income.
Taxing authority
The Constitution Act, 1867 (formerly the British North American Act, 1867)
grants both the federal and provincial governments the exclusive authority
to impose income taxes.
All provinces and territories have their own income tax legislation. While it
is the responsibility of each province and territory to update and maintain
its own acts governing income taxes for its residents, provincial legislation
tends to mirror many aspects of the federal Income Tax Act. Provincial
income tax rates are set and managed by each province.
40
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Department of Finance
Department of Justice
Planning considerations
Jurisprudence plays an important role in clarifying tax law through
precedent-setting court rulings. In fact, when tax practitioners advise
clients on tax-planning initiatives, they must often take into consideration
the Income Tax Act, the regulations, jurisprudence, the Canada Revenue
Agency’s administrative guidelines, and peer review to arrive at an
41
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
appropriate decision. All the while, tax practitioners must remember that
all of the jurisprudence and much of the Canada Revenue Agency
administrative guidance is limited to the facts of the situation that
precipitated the specific ruling in question.
Overview
Tax planning is an important component of financial planning. A dollar of
reduced taxes puts more money in an individual’s pocket than a dollar of
incremental income, because a dollar of tax savings is ready to spend
whereas a dollar of incremental income still has to be taxed.
42
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Tax minimization
While Canada has clearly defined rules about who is subject to income tax,
legitimate tax planning can lower or minimize an individual’s overall
income tax liability and do so in a legal way. Tax minimization means
looking for legitimate strategies to reduce the individual’s tax liability that
might otherwise be payable. For example, individuals who make a
charitable donation can use the accompanying tax credit to lower their
overall taxes payable in the current year, depending on their income level,
or may carry it forward for up to five years.
Timing
Decisions related to the timing of the donation and claim for the
corresponding tax credit could involve tax planning to minimize the
individual’s overall income tax liability, taking into account his or her
personal affairs. This is an example of minimizing the amount of income
tax that might otherwise be payable. By using legitimate tax planning
strategies, individuals are able to lower or minimize their income taxes
payable.
Tax deferral
Similarly, the deferral of income taxes owing will push the tax
consequences into the future, leaving the taxpayer with a larger sum of
money between the time of the deferral and the time of the actual tax
payment. A contribution to a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) is
an example of a tax deferral opportunity. When individuals make
contributions into an RRSP, they are entitled to a tax deduction within
prescribed limits, lowering their overall income tax liability that would
43
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
otherwise be payable. Furthermore, the funds held within the RRSP do not
attract income tax while retained within the RRSP structure.
The concept of tax avoidance involves using tax planning to minimize the
amount of income tax payable and doing so within the boundaries of
Canadian tax laws. The Canada Revenue Agency, however, views tax
avoidance as tax planning that reduces taxes in a way that is inconsistent
with the overall spirit or intent of the laws. As such, the Canada Revenue
Agency has placed increased scrutiny on transactions it views as
unacceptable and abusive in nature. The term aggressive tax planning has
evolved and is defined by the Canada Revenue Agency as arrangements
they feel are “pushing the limits.” For this reason, the Canada Revenue
Agency will often challenge tax-avoidance transactions by the various
means available to it.
44
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Finally, tax evasion occurs when taxpayers deliberately deceive the Canada
Revenue Agency. This may occur through a variety of intentional actions
such as knowingly not reporting income, omitting material information or
claiming false deductions and credits to which the taxpayer is not entitled.
Tax evasion is illegal and can subject the taxpayer to both criminal and
civil prosecution. The Canada Revenue Agency has introduced a reward
program to encourage individuals to provide the Canada Revenue Agency
with information on international tax non-compliance that results in
recovery of at least $100,000 of federal income taxes. Awards will be paid
based on 15% of the federal income tax collected.
3
Government of Canada, Department of Finance, Explanatory Notes, Income Tax Act,
Section 245, 1988.
4
Ibid.
45
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
T-slips
As part of filing a personal income tax return, it is important for a taxpayer
to ensure that he or she has complete information on income received
from all sources. This information typically comes in the form of a T-slip.
The most common T-slips a taxpayer will receive are:
T3 — Trust Income
T4 — Employment Income
T5 — Investment Income
46
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Medical-type receipts
Childcare receipts
Self-assessment system
Canada uses a self-assessment and self-reporting tax system, like most
industrialized countries. This puts the onus on the taxpayer to calculate his
or her income tax and to self-report the result to the government. With the
exception of a deceased taxpayer, it is the taxpayer’s responsibility to pay
the required tax owing by April 30 of the year following the taxation year.
The onus is on the taxpayer to substantiate any claims made in a tax
filing.
Types of taxpayers
In very general terms, there are three types of taxpayers: individuals,
corporations and trusts.
Individuals
An individual may have a variety of sources of income including
employment income, business income or passive income such as
investments or rental income. An individual operating a business as a sole
proprietor would include the income from the proprietorship as personal
business income. Individuals could also be partners of a partnership and
would include their share of the partnership income on their personal
income tax return.
47
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Corporations
A corporation is a legal entity, generally with share capital owned by its
shareholders. A corporation is taxed as a separate legal entity.
Trusts
In simple terms, a trust is a relationship under which one party (trustee)
holds title to property (trust property) for the benefit of another party
(beneficiaries). The property held by a trust belongs to the beneficiaries
(beneficial owner), but legal title is held by the trustee on behalf of the
beneficiaries under the terms of the trust documents. A trust is generally
treated as a separate taxpayer.
Owes tax for the year in excess of amounts already withheld on the
taxpayer’s behalf
Has income greater than the minimum threshold beyond which Canada
Pension Plan (CPP) contributions are required
48
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
49
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Has no income tax payable for the year and did not receive a demand
from the Minister to file a return
Was considered non-resident for the taxation year and was not
employed in Canada, did not carry on business in Canada, and did not
dispose of any taxable Canadian property
Individual taxpayer
Deceased taxpayer
Partner in a partnership
Corporation
50
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Trust
Individuals filed their income tax return using paper-based returns and the
regular mail system for many years. Technological advancements have
expanded the options available to individuals to meet their required filing
obligations.
Individuals can now use the following services recognized by the Canada
Revenue Agency:
Individual
The income tax return for an individual is due on or before April 30 of the
year following the taxation year, unless noted otherwise in the following
sections. Any income tax owing is also due by April 30.
51
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Ling Chu is a tech specialist operating her business as a sole proprietorship. Ling and
her spouse Effie must file their income tax returns by June 15 each year (for the prior
taxation year), although the balance of income tax owing must be paid by April 30 of
the year following the taxation year.
Deceased taxpayer
Year of death
A taxpayer’s income tax return for income earned in the year of death
(commonly referred to as the final or terminal return) is due the later of:
The due date for the balance of taxes owing on a final return for a
deceased taxpayer is:
52
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The idea behind these rules is that the legal representative of the deceased
taxpayer should have at least six months before being required to submit a
return. If the taxpayer dies on January 1, the return for income earned in
the year prior to death must be filed by July 1, at the latest (would have
been April 30 if the taxpayer was not deceased). If the self-employed rules
apply, the legal representative has until July 1 (would have been June 15 if
the taxpayer was not deceased).
EXAMPLE 1
Heddie, a retired individual, died on June 18, 2019. Her 2019 income tax return is due
April 30, 2020.
53
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE 2
Steven, a single individual, died on December 9, 2019. Steven was an employee of
Justin Time Manufacturing, where he had worked for 5 years. His final tax return,
which captures his 2019 income, is due June 9, 2020.
EXAMPLE 3
Sheri, a 42-year-old widow and employee of Ace Tools, died January 24, 2019. Her
2018 income tax return had not yet been filed. Sheri’s 2018 return is due by July 24,
2019, while her final return for 2019 is due by April 30, 2020.
Partner in a partnership
The Income Tax Act designates that a partner in a partnership is carrying
on the business of the partnership for the purposes of determining when
the tax return is due. For that reason, a partner in a partnership will also
have a June 15 filing due date. Although these individuals have until June
15 to file their return, the tax liability is due on April 30 and any interest
owing is calculated from that date.
EXAMPLE
Don is in partnership with Pat, and together they operate a law practice as joint
partners. June 15 is the due date for Don, Pat and their respective spouses to file
their annual income tax returns for the prior taxation year. The due date for any
outstanding tax liabilities is April 30 of the year following the taxation year.
54
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Corporation
Corporations must file their tax return within six months of their fiscal
year-end.
Taxes owing must be remitted within 60 days after the corporation’s fiscal
year-end. As an exception, a corporation has three months after the year-
end to pay the final balance owing, if the following conditions both apply:
b) the corporation is claiming the small business deduction for the tax
year, or was allowed the small business deduction in the previous
tax year
In addition to (a) and (b), the corporation and all associated corporations
together must have total taxable income less than the small business
deduction.
EXAMPLE
Charlene is the sole shareholder of Charbo Inc., a small corporation with an April 30
year-end. The income tax return for Charbo Inc. must be filed by October 31. The
filing due dates for Charlene’s personal income tax return and the corporate income
tax return for Charbo Inc. are independent of each other.
Trust
A trust must file its income tax and information return within 90 days after
the trust’s year-end. As well, any balance of income taxes owing is due
within 90 days after the trust’s year-end.
55
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
56
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
57
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Assessment
Once a taxpayer files an income tax return, the Canada Revenue Agency
may request additional information or may move directly to issue a Notice
of Assessment. The purpose of the Notice of Assessment is to allow the
Canada Revenue Agency to respond to the taxpayer’s filing position and
either accept or challenge what the taxpayer has filed.
Notice of Assessment
The Notice of Assessment is divided into four distinct sections.
The first is a section that identifies the taxpayer including his or her
address
58
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Taxpayers will receive a Notice of Assessment either in the mail from the
Canada Revenue Agency or an email instructing them to log into their
online account with the Canada Revenue Agency to download a copy
through the taxpayer’s account.
59
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Reassessment
Although the Canada Revenue Agency may accept an individual taxpayer’s
return as originally filed, the return is open to reassessment for three
years. Subsequent to having sent a Notice of Assessment, it is common for
the Canada Revenue Agency to request copies of documents or
confirmation of details related to a return, particularly with the shift to on-
line filing.
After three years from the date of the original assessment, the return is
statute-barred. This means the Canada Revenue Agency cannot typically
reassess after the three-year period has expired unless the return includes
fraud or misrepresentation, in which case the three-year statute-barred
period does not apply.
Notice of Objection
If a taxpayer receives a Notice of Assessment or Reassessment with a
request to pay more tax, the Notice should be carefully reviewed. If the
taxpayer and/or his or her advisors conclude that the Notice of Assessment
or Reassessment is incorrect, the next step is to contact the Canada
Revenue Agency’s District Office to discuss the situation. If the discussion
results in an impasse, the taxpayer can consider filing a Notice of
Objection or write a letter to the Canada Revenue Agency. The taxpayer
must file the Notice of Objection or letter within 90 days of the date the
61
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Notice of Assessment was mailed, or within one year of the due date of the
return, whichever is later.
The Notice of Objection must be in writing and must detail the reason why
the taxpayer is objecting. It is sent to the Chief of Appeals at the
appropriate District Taxation Office. The result is an independent review of
the file by the Canada Revenue Agency. The Chief of Appeals then delivers
the results by either confirming the original assessment/re-assessment or
varying it. If the taxpayer feels this assessment does not accurately reflect
the amount of taxes owing, the next step is to appeal the assessment/re-
assessment to the Tax Court of Canada.
Requirements
Income tax instalments are designed for a variety of reasons, including
cash flow and fairness. Instalments provide a steady stream of cash to the
government from tax collections to finance ongoing government
expenditures. In addition, there is a fairness issue because many
individuals are subject to tax withholding at source, so they have already
submitted income taxes associated with the payment received. By
requesting instalments from individuals who have income that is not
62
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Due dates
Tax instalments are due on the 15th of March, June, September, and
December for all individuals. There is an exception for individuals who earn
farming or fishing income, as their tax instalment is due on December 31.
63
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The outcome of the special tax calculation is a tax liability that is compared
to the individual’s tax liability under the regular calculation for that
particular year. The taxpayer is required to pay the “higher of” amount
when comparing the two calculations. In order to ensure fairness in the
system, to the extent that an individual pays alternative minimum tax in a
particular year, the excess amount can be carried forward and claimed as
a refund when alternative minimum tax is less than regular tax within the
subsequent seven years.
Penalties
Late filing penalty
If an individual is obligated to file a return but does not do so on time, the
government imposes a penalty of 5% of the unpaid tax. The government
imposes an additional 1% penalty for every additional month the tax
return is late, up to a maximum of 12%. These penalties are in addition to
the interest and penalties the government imposes on late or deficient
payments.
EXAMPLE
The average interest rate on 90-day treasury bills in the first month of 2019 (the
preceding quarter to April, May and June of 2019) was 2%. Therefore, the interest
rate charged to taxpayers on late or deficient payments was 6% (2% + 4%) for
amounts outstanding during April, May and June 2019.
Interest charges apply to late or deficient amounts from the time the
payment was due until any payments are made. This is in addition to any
penalties that may be applied because of the late or deficient payment.
66
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
67
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Tax refunds
It is the Canada Revenue Agency’s general practice to assess and issue a
refund within two weeks for tax returns filed online and within eight weeks
for paper filings. It is common, however, for the Canada Revenue Agency
to request additional information from a taxpayer after a Notice of
Assessment has been issued, particularly for returns filed online.
68
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
when the planner or preparer did not intend to deceive. The rules are very
broad and complex, with possible implications for financial advisors.
Financial advisors, including financial planners, should be cognizant of the
existence of civil penalty rules and apply care in providing tax planning
advice.
69
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Introduction
A financial planner must have a good understanding of the Canadian
personal income tax system. As such, this section provides a
comprehensive understanding of the general concepts of personal income
tax and a foundation for the basic elements and issues surrounding income
tax computations.
This section frequently references the Income Tax and Benefit Return,
which is available on the Canada Revenue Agency website. The discussion
does not review every line of the form, but rather focuses on select
aspects. While reading this section, be sure to refer to the areas/lines
referenced on the Income Tax and Benefit Return.
The titles and subtitles in this section reference the numbers (Roman
numerals) assigned to each of the 14 steps described in the Calculating an
Individual’s Income Tax Liability table and Income Tax Calculation list.
70
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Step Calculation
71
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Employment income
Other income
72
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Moving expenses
= (I) – (II)
= (III) – (IV)
Age amount
Adoption expenses
Disability amount
Medical expenses
= (VI) – (VII)
Subtract:
Add:
= (VIII) – (IX)
75
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Add:
CPP overpayment
(XI) Refund or Balance Due= Total tax payable less total credits
76
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
77
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
78
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Employment income
Line 101
Commissions
While commission income earned by employees is reported with all
employment income, it is also reported on line 102. This is important
because an employee earning commission income is entitled to certain
expense deductions.
Taxpayers report employment income for income tax purposes in the year
they receive it, not the year in which it is earned. For example, payment
on January 8 that relates to work done in December of the prior year is
taxed as employment income in the year the taxpayer receives the
payment. Retroactive pay increases are taxed when received, so there is
no need to amend a tax return.
79
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Under the salary deferral rules, the deferred amount is taxable in the year
the right arises, rather than in the year the employee receives the amount.
80
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Taxable benefits are included in the return on line 101 (if included in box
14 of the T4 slip) or on line 104 (if the taxpayer is reporting the income
without a corresponding T4 slip).
81
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Automobile benefit
If an employer makes a vehicle available to an employee, it creates a
taxable benefit to the employee and the employee must include the value
of the benefit in income. The Income Tax Act sets out specific formulas to
establish the value, which includes both a standby charge and an operating
cost benefit the employee must include in taxable income.
Standby charge
Standby Charge
Standby charge = 2% x (number of months the vehicle is available for use) x (total
original cost of the vehicle including all PST, GST, HST) – (employee reimbursements
attributable to the standby charge made no later than 45 days after the end of the
year)
82
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Standby charge = 2/3 x ((monthly lease cost excluding insurance or other itemized
charges) x (number of months the vehicle is available for use)) – (employee
reimbursements attributable to the standby charge made no later than 45 days after
the end of the year)
EXAMPLE
Keith’s employer provides him with an automobile valued at $30,000 (including HST).
The vehicle was available to Keith for the entire past year. Keith did not reimburse his
employer for expenses associated with the use of the automobile. This creates a
standby charge of:
2% x 12 months x $30,000
= $600 per month x 12 months
= $7,200
EXAMPLE
Hetta’s employer leases an automobile for her exclusive use throughout the year. The
employer’s monthly lease cost is $600. Hetta did not reimburse her employer for the
use of the automobile. This creates a standby charge of:
83
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The same strategy applies if the vehicle is not used on weekends. Simply
leaving a vehicle in the employee’s home garage is generally not sufficient
to reduce the “available for use” number, even if the employee does not
use it or is away from home. The best approach is to leave the vehicle, and
keys to the vehicle, at the employer’s office/location whenever the vehicle
is not needed.
The employer must specify that the vehicle is required for business
84
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
If Keith from the previous example used the vehicle for business purposes at least
50% of the time, and if his personal portion of the total kilometres travelled averaged
750 kilometres per month, Keith is eligible for a reduced standby charge. Keith’s
reduced standby charge is calculated as follows:
85
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Alternative 1
The general alternative is to apply a prescribed kilometre charge for every kilometre of
personal-use driving. The prescribed rate is set annually; for 2019, it was $0.28 per
kilometre of personal-use driving.
Alternative 2
If an employee can demonstrate that he or she used the vehicle primarily for business
purposes (i.e., 50% or more), a second alternative is available. Under this alternative,
the employee may choose an operating cost benefit income inclusion equal to 50% of
the applicable standby charge. The employee must also request in writing, before the
end of the year, that the employer use Alternative 2.
EXAMPLE
Assume that Keith in the previous examples drove the company-owned automobile a
total of 20,000 kilometres in the year. During that time, 75% of the kilometres were for
business purposes, while the other 25% constituted personal driving. Although Keith
did not keep a detailed driving record, he had sufficient general records to
approximate the 75%/25% split. The operating cost of the vehicle (gas, oil,
maintenance, insurance) totalled $5,000 during the 12 months of the year that Keith
drove the automobile. The company paid for all operating costs.
86
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The basic standby charge is (2% x (cost of vehicle) x (number of months driven)). In
this case:
Standby charge
= 2% x $30,000 x 12 months
= $7,200 for the year
Keith must also include an operating cost benefit in his income. Because he does not
have detailed driving logs, but can substantiate more than 50% business use, he can
use the formula that designates the operating cost benefit to be 50% of the standby
charge amount. Under this formula:
Note that Keith’s operating cost benefit does not relate to the actual expenses his
employer incurred with respect to the automobile. Instead, Keith must apply the
government-prescribed formula.
The total income inclusion for Keith for the company-owned automobile is:
87
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Had Keith kept detailed driving records to support driving 5,000 kilometres of
personal-use, he could have used the alternative method to calculate an operating
cost benefit of $1,400 (20,000 kilometres x 25% x $0.28/kilometre). There is no
benefit to using Alternative 1 for Keith in this case.
Parking
Employer-provided parking is usually a taxable benefit, whether or not the
employer owns the parking lot.
When the employee has a disability, the parking benefit is generally not
taxable
When the parking is for business purposes and the employee regularly
uses his or her own car for business travel
Transit passes
Employer-provided or subsidized transit passes are a taxable benefit to the
employee.
88
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Employer-paid education
Employer-paid training and educational costs are a taxable benefit to the
employee, unless the training is primarily for the benefit of the employer.
EXAMPLE 1
Moham is the director of marketing at NetPro Software, where he has worked for the
past five years. To increase his knowledge of accounting and finance, Moham
enrolled in an executive MBA program at a local university. NetPro Software paid
Moham’s tuition — $20,000 per year for two years —because they felt the Moham
would be of greater value to the organization after completing the degree. He would
have a more solid grasp of accounting and finance concepts. In this case, the
$20,000 for each of the two years is a non-taxable benefit for Moham.
EXAMPLE 2
Effie is the vice-president of finance for UR First Health Centres, where her role
involves managing all aspects of the company’s financial affairs. Having been in her
role for 12 years, and having taken many courses to enhance her skills, Effie recently
enrolled in a nutrition program at the local college. The program focused on a
completely new and unrelated field Effie wished to explore. Keeping with standard
company policy, UR First Health Centres paid the $2,500 tuition cost for Effie’s
enrolment in the nutrition program. This $2,500 cost is a taxable benefit to Effie
because, while it is company policy to cover fees for programs of this nature, her
participation does not have a direct benefit for the employer.
89
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Alicia’s employer pays the monthly premium of $85.49 ($1,025.88 annually) for her
individual disability insurance policy. The $1,025.88 is a taxable benefit to Alicia.
If Alicia becomes disabled and qualifies for benefits under the individual disability
insurance policy, the benefit payments she receives are non-taxable.
90
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE 1
As part of Bongo’s benefits program at work, his employer pays the premium for his
group life insurance. The monthly premium is $18.75. The employer’s payment of this
premium generates a taxable benefit to Bongo of $225 per year ($18.75 per month for
12 months).
EXAMPLE 2
Leah’s employer provides group life insurance as part of its benefits package. While
the employer pays the monthly premium to the insurance carrier (cost of Leah’s
insurance is $22.95 per month), her employer withholds $22.95 from Leah’s monthly
paycheque. In this case, because Leah is repaying her employer for the cost of the
insurance premium, she will not incur a taxable benefit.
91
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE 1
As part of a comprehensive benefits package available to all employees, Michelle’s
employer makes the services of a financial planner available to all staff and their
families. The employer covers the cost of this financial planning service. Michelle and
her spouse have decided to use this service, so its value becomes a taxable benefit to
Michelle and her employer will add it to her T4 slip.
EXAMPLE 2
Nick has been provided with four months’ notice that his position with URL will
become redundant. As part of his severance package, Nick has opted to participate in
re-employment counselling services. The value of the re-employment counselling
services URL pays for Nick’s participation in these services is not a taxable benefit to
Nick.
Professional fees
If an employer reimburses or provides access to professional services,
such as estate lawyers or tax preparation, the employer’s cost for the
services is a taxable benefit to employees who access these services.
92
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Table 7 summarizes the prescribed interest rates in 2017, 2018 and 2019
that are applicable for taxable benefits for employees.
Year Quarter
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
2019 2% 2% 2% 2%
2018 1% 2% 2% 2%
2017 1% 1% 1% 1%
93
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
In an effort to recruit Spencer as its new sales director, Big Sales Company offered him
an interest-free loan of $20,000 to use towards the purchase of a cottage.
Assume that Big Sales Company granted the loan to Spencer on January 1, 2019, when
he joined the firm. What is the income inclusion associated with Spencer’s loan for the
2019 tax year?
94
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The tax rules require the calculation of an imputed interest benefit that is added to
Spencer’s 2019 income as a taxable benefit. The interest income benefit is the
difference between the prescribed interest rate and the amount of interest actually
paid (which in this case is nil because it was an interest-free loan).
The prescribed interest rate for 2019 was 2% for each quarter. This results in an
income inclusion of $400 in 2019 for the imputed interest benefit:
2% x $20,000 x 90
1st Quarter $98.63
365
2% x $20,000 x 91
2nd Quarter $99.73
365
2% x $20,000 x 92
3rd Quarter $100.82
365
2% x $20,000 x 92
4th Quarter $100.82
365
Spencer will have a $400 imputed interest taxable benefit as a result of his interest-
free loan from Big Sales Co.
RRSP contributions
Any amount that an employer contributes to an employee’s RRSP, or pays
to cover the cost of RRSP administration, is a taxable benefit to the
employee. This does not include amounts withheld from an employee’s
remuneration for contribution to an RRSP.
95
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Wilson participates in a group RRSP sponsored by his employer. As part of the
employee benefits package, Wilson’s employer matches employee contributions to
the plan. During the year, Wilson’s employer withheld $6,750 from his earnings as his
contribution to the group RRSP. In addition, the employer contributed $6,750 directly
to the group RRSP on Wilson’s behalf, to match Wilson’s contribution.
Note, however, that the $6,750 specifically withheld from Wilson’s pay and submitted
on his behalf to the group RRSP does not constitute a taxable benefit because the
contribution was from Wilson’s own money (deducted from his paycheque).
The rules surrounding the taxable benefits associated with stock options
have expanded in recent years and in their entirety are quite complex.
Basic rule: Merely the granting of options does not generate a taxable
benefit. For a taxable employment benefit to arise, the employee must
exercise the option and purchase or acquire shares. The taxable benefit is
the amount by which the fair market value of the shares (what they were
worth at the time of purchase) exceeds the exercise price (the price at
which the shares were purchased).
96
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
What he or she actually paid (i.e., the cost to acquire the shares)
plus
plus
plus
To qualify for this deduction both of the following conditions must apply:
This deduction does not affect the employee’s adjusted cost base of the
shares.
97
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
In 2015, Bill is granted 1,000 options to buy common shares of his employer, a
publicly traded company. Bill deals at arm’s length with the company. The options
have an exercise price of $10 each at a time when the shares are trading on the open
market at $9 each. In January 2019, Bill exercises his right to buy 1,000 shares by
paying $10,000. At the time Bill exercises his options, the fair market value of the
shares has risen to $25 each. In October 2019, Bill leaves his employer and sells his
shares on the open market for $35 each. What are the income tax implications of
these transactions?
2015
January 2019
Bill realizes a taxable benefit of $15,000, calculated as $25 (fair market value at time
of exercise) less $10 (exercise price) multiplied by 1,000 shares.
Taxable benefit
= ($25 – $10) x 1,000
= $15,000
Bill’s adjusted cost base is $25,000, calculated as $10,000 (what he paid his
employer) plus $15,000 (his taxable benefit).
Bill is entitled to a deduction from net income of $7,500, calculated as 50% (current
capital gains inclusion rate) times $15,000 (taxable benefit).
Deduction
= 50% x $15,000
= $7,500
98
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
October 2019
Bill realizes a capital gain of $10,000, calculated as $35 (selling price) less $25 (his
adjusted cost base) times 1,000 shares.
Capital gain
= ($35 – $25) x 1,000
= $10,000
Alternatively, the employer can elect not to take the deduction, in which
case the employee would be entitled to a deduction equal to 50% of the
taxable benefit realized.
The rules change slightly when stock options are granted by a Canadian-
controlled private corporation (CCPC) to an employee who deals at arm’s
length with the corporation. The employment income inclusion is the same
amount, but the timing of the income inclusion is deferred until the shares
are sold (this is different from the basic rules where the income inclusion
occurs when the shares are purchased).
99
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The shares acquired when the option is exercised are held for a
minimum of two years
The exercise price (the price the underlying share can be purchased
for) is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the shares
when the options were granted
The offsetting deduction reduces the tax cost of the employee benefit by
an amount equal to 50% of the difference between the exercise price and
fair market value.
EXAMPLE
In 2010, Leo is granted 1,000 options to buy shares of his employer, a CCPC. The
options have an exercise price of $1 each at a time when shares are worth
approximately $8 each. In 2015, Leo exercises his right to buy 1,000 shares by paying
$1,000 to his employer, when the shares are valued at $10 each. In 2019, Leo leaves
his employer and sells his shares for $35 each. What are the income tax implications
of these transactions?
2010
100
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
2015
No income tax implications. Since the employer is a CCPC, Leo does not have a
taxable benefit income inclusion at the time he exercises his options.
2019
Leo realizes a taxable benefit of $9,000, calculated as $10 (fair market value at time
of exercise) less $1 (exercise price) times 1,000 shares.
Taxable benefit
= ($10 – $1) x 1,000
= $9,000
Leo also realizes a capital gain of $25,000, calculated as $35 (selling price) less $10
($1 cost of shares exercise price plus $9 taxable benefit) times 1,000 shares.
Capital gain
Leo is entitled to a deduction from net income of $4,500, calculated as 50% (current
capital gains inclusion rate) times $9,000 (taxable benefit), since he held the CCPC
shares for more than two years.
Deduction
= 50% x $9,000
= $4,500
scenario, the employees’ portion has no tax consequences, but the amount
the employer pays is taxable income to the employees.
When the province levies a provincial health tax to the employer, there is
no taxable benefit to the employee since liability for the tax lies with the
employer and not the employee (e.g., Ontario’s Employer Health Tax).
When an employee uses a company credit card, the points are considered
to belong to the employer. As such, when an employee uses the points
associated with a company-owned credit card, the fair market value of the
benefit derived is a taxable benefit to the employee. Employers are
required to report the value of points redeemed on the employee’s T4 slip.
If not reported by the employer, it remains the employee’s responsibility to
self-report.
102
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Non-taxable benefits
Automobile allowance (for use of own vehicle)
The Income Tax Act stipulates that allowances an employer pays to an
employee to cover the cost of using the employee’s automobile for
employment purposes are not a taxable benefit, provided that the
allowance is reasonable. The only allowance that the Canada Revenue
Agency considers reasonable is one based strictly on a rate per kilometre
where the reimbursement is for actual kilometres driven during
employment activities. The reimbursement for other expenses such as
parking, toll bridges or toll highways do not impair the reasonableness of
an allowance provided that the employer reimburses these other expenses
solely on the basis of actual expenses incurred.
While the Income Tax Act does not define the term reasonable, the Canada
Revenue agency sets annual maximum amounts that it uses as yardsticks
for measuring reasonableness.
103
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
$0.58 per kilometre for the first 5,000 kilometres and $0.52 per
kilometre thereafter
When an employer pays a flat allowance to the employee for the use of his
or her automobile, the full allowance is considered taxable income. As well,
if the employer pays a flat allowance and a reasonable per-kilometre
allowance, the total of the two amounts is taxable and must be included as
income.
104
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Counselling services
Counselling services paid by an employer for employees are not a taxable
benefit provided the services relate to any of the following:
Counselling services and planning services beyond this list are considered
a taxable benefit.
Relocation expenses
When an employer requests that an employee move from one location to
another, the following items are non-taxable benefits when the employer
pays for them:
House-hunting trips, including child and pet care expenses when the
employee is away
105
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Items beyond this list are generally considered taxable benefits to the
employee.
The Income Tax Act defines a private health services plan as:
106
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
To begin with, any cash or near-cash gift is always a taxable benefit to the
employee. The Canada Revenue Agency considers near-cash gifts to
include gift certificates, gift cards and any item that can be easily
converted into cash, such as gold, securities or stocks. For example, a
$200 gift card to a restaurant is considered additional remuneration and is
taxable income to the employee.
107
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
108
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
minimum of five years of service and there must be at least five years
between awards. For the purposes of applying the $500 thresholds, the
annual gifts and awards threshold and the long service/anniversary awards
threshold are separate. In other words, a shortfall in value under one
category cannot offset an excess value under the other category.
The Canada Revenue Agency’s administrative leniency for gifts and awards
does not apply to non-arm’s-length employees (e.g., relatives of the
proprietor and shareholders of closely held corporations) or related
persons of non-arm’s-length employees.
The Canada Revenue Agency’s administrative policy for gifts and awards is
very narrow in its application, allowing only the circumstances noted
above. Performance-related rewards (e.g., for meeting sales targets) or
cash and near-cash awards (e.g., gift certificates) fall outside the
administrative policy and are taxable income to the employee.
EXAMPLE
Zach’s employer has given him the following gifts and awards:
T-shirt with employer logo: $15
Birthday gift (monetary gift certificate): $75
Reward for meeting sales performance target (weekend holiday): $400
10-year anniversary award (art print): $275 (the last anniversary award Zach
received was for his five-year anniversary with the employer)
Wedding gift (crystal vase): $300
Innovation award (tickets to a specific sporting event on a specific day): $250
Holiday season gift (watch): $150
Tax consequences
T-shirt with employer logo ($15): this is non-taxable benefit as it is of
immaterial/nominal value
109
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Birthday gift (monetary gift certificate, $75): this is taxable because, as a near-
cash gift, it is not eligible for the gift and award policy
Reward for meeting sales performance target (weekend holiday valued at $400):
this is taxable because, as a performance-related reward, it not eligible for the gift
and award policy
10-year anniversary award (art print, $275): this is eligible under the criteria for a
long service/anniversary award
Wedding gift (crystal vase, $300): this is eligible under the gift and award policy
Innovation award (tickets to a specific sporting event on a specific date, $250):
eligible under the gift and award policy
Holiday season gift (watch, $150): this is eligible under the gift and award policy.
The total value of items eligible for the gifts and awards policy (wedding gift,
innovation award and holiday season gift) is $700. This exceeds the $500 threshold
by $200. Zach will therefore receive a taxable benefit of $200 related to these items.
In addition, the birthday gift (gift certificate valued at $75) and reward for meeting
sales performance target (weekend holiday, $400) fall outside the gifts and awards
policy, resulting in another $475 of taxable benefits for Zach.
In total, Zach will have $675 to taxable benefits related to the gifts and awards he
received from his employer.
The 10-year anniversary award (art print, $275) falls within a separate category for
non-cash long service/anniversary awards. Although the $275 award is less than the
$500 limit for this category, none of the shortfall can be used to offset the taxable
benefit amount described in the separate gift and award category.
110
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Club dues
If an employer pays an employee’s membership fee to a social or athletic
club where membership is primarily for the employer’s advantage, the fee
is not a taxable benefit to the employee. However, if it cannot be
established that the club is primarily for the benefit of the employer, the
club dues the employer pays are a taxable benefit to the employee.
Another option is for the employer to pay the premium and add the
amount of the premium as a taxable benefit to the employee, at the time
of the premium payment. In this case, should the employee become ill and
qualify for benefit payments under the plan, the benefit payments are not
taxable to the employee.
112
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
are fully paid by the employer, and the benefit payments to the employee
employer does not designate the are taxable
payment as a taxable benefit to the
employee
are fully paid by the employer, and the benefit payments to the employee
employer designates the payment as a are not taxable
taxable benefit to the employee
are shared between the employer and benefit payments to the employee
employee, and the employer does not are taxable, but any amount the
designate any portion of its premium employee contributed to premiums
payments as a taxable benefit to the reduces the amount of taxable
employee income
EXAMPLE 1
Kelly’s employer pays the monthly premium of $45.97 ($551.64 annually) for her
group long-term disability insurance policy. The annual premium payment of $551.64
is not a taxable benefit to Kelly.
If Kelly becomes disabled and qualifies to receive $3,000 per month of benefits under
the group long-term disability insurance policy, the benefit payments are taxable
income.
If Kelly had paid 50% of the premiums, the $3,000 per month of benefits would still be
taxable, but she would qualify for a deduction equal to the premiums she paid. Kelly
cannot deduct more than the income inclusion of the benefits.
113
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE 2
Roxanne is the manager of sales at RoToDo. All management staff participate in the
company’s group wage-loss replacement plan, and the employer pays the premiums.
Roxanne was injured at a baseball game last month and is now receiving benefits
from the plan. The benefit payments Roxanne receives are taxable income because
the employer paid the full premium for the plan.
EXAMPLE 3
At Greenborough Manufacturing, one of the benefits available to all non-management
office staff is shared premium payments for a group wage-loss replacement plan.
Russel found the benefit quite attractive, as he could acquire wage protection by
paying $1,000 per year, with Greenborough covering the remaining premium. Russel
enrolled in the plan when he first joined the company. On January 1, 2020, Russel
developed a serious illness that caused him to miss work, and he qualified to receive
benefits under the plan for the first time. His monthly benefit is $1,500.
Up to the end of 2019, Robert had contributed a total of $5,000 towards premiums for
the group wage-loss replacement plan. The first $5,000 of benefits received by Robert
are not taxable. After that, any further benefits will be taxable income.
114
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Discounts
When employers sell merchandise below cost, the taxable benefit arising
is calculated as the difference between fair market value and the amount
the employee paid.
Commissions on merchandise
115
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The Canada Revenue Agency’s position that the non-taxable status only
applies when the commission income received is not significant creates
uncertainty, as the Canada Revenue Agency is silent on what amount of
commission, in its view, is considered significant. The Canada Revenue
Agency has challenged cases and won because it is their administrative
policy and not the law; it can withhold leniency depending on the facts of
the situation. The courts are bound by the legislation, as set out in the
Income Tax Act. As such, the courts cannot force the Canada Revenue
Agency to apply its administrative policy when the policy is more lenient
than the specific tax legislation.
Uniforms
A taxable benefit does not arise when an employer supplies its employees
with a distinctive uniform or protective clothing such as safety footwear
and safety glasses.
Is it
Allowance or benefit
Taxable?
116
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Depends on
Group wage-loss replacement program or income structure of
maintenance plan – employer-paid premiums premium
payment
117
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Uniforms No
118
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
119
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The pay stub an employer issues to an employee can be helpful, but the
financial planner may need to accumulate the full series of pay stubs to
complete the picture. A final pay stub for a calendar year may be valuable
if it displays year-to-date information.
If the employer uses direct deposit for payroll, information from the
employee’s bank account will show the direct deposit amounts. These can
be helpful for tracking cashflow; however, the direct deposit amount is the
net amount, after tax and deductions, so financial planners should use the
information with caution. While deposits can be helpful for cashflow, the
picture is incomplete because it does not show withholdings or other
relevant information such as amounts directed to pension accounts,
RRSPs, Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs) or an employer stock purchase
plan. Employer matching for savings vehicles is not reflected in the net
deposit.
120
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Remuneration planning
Not all employees have the benefit of working with their employer to
structure their compensation package, but there may be times when
employees have the opportunity to choose elements of their total
remuneration. This is more common with senior executives, although
flexible benefits that give regular employees a say in the choice of plan
design are increasingly more common.
Group health and dental benefits are important for most employees,
especially if they have a family. The premium the employer pays for group
health and dental benefits is not taxable to the employee. As such, if an
employee has the option to direct employer money towards a group health
and dental plan, this can be a wise choice as there is no additional cost to
the employee when the employer pays.
121
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
122
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Individuals who borrow assets from their RRSP under the Lifelong Learning
Plan or Home Buyers’ Plan are subject to a repayment plan, as outlined in
the Module 4, Registered Retirement Plans. In general terms, when an
individual misses a repayment, the missed amount is included in the
individual’s income for the year the repayment was due.
123
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Individuals age 60 or older may have income that includes Old Age
Security income on line 113 from box 18 of the T4A(OAS) slip (not the
Guaranteed Income Supplement portion) or CPP/QPP benefits on line 114
from box 20 of the T4A(P) slip. Depending on the provincial rules related
to pension income, individuals, from age 50 onward, may have private
pension income (line 115) to consider when looking at overall income.
Individuals who have converted their RRSP assets into a RRIF, will have an
annual income inclusion arising from the RRIF. While Module 4, Registered
Retirement Plans, discusses the detailed rules related to RRIF income, this
is a general overview of what to consider when looking for income-related
items for income tax purposes.
124
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Registered annuities
Line 115
Any Canadian resident who receives income that qualifies for the pension
income tax credit can allocate up to half of this income to his or her
resident spouse or common-law partner. The rules governing the type of
pension income that qualifies for income splitting mirror the rules
governing eligibility for the $2,000 pension income credit.
125
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The transferred pension income retains its character in the hands of the
receiving spouse or common-law partner for all purposes, which means the
receiving spouse or common-law partner may be able to claim the $2,000
pension income credit.
For individuals age 65 and older at the end of the year, the main types of
qualifying pension income that can be transferred to a spouse or common-
law partner’s return include:
For individuals under age 65, the list is far more restrictive and includes:
The age of the receiving spouse or common-law partner does not matter
with respect to pension income splitting; as long as one spouse has
qualifying pension income that can be split, the age of the other spouse is
not a consideration.
126
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Types of income that specifically do not qualify for pension income splitting
include:
CPP/QPP
127
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
While CPP income does not qualify as eligible pension income for the
pension income credit, existing rules permit CPP pensioners to split their
CPP retirement benefits. Spouses and common-law partners, who are both
at least age 60, can share up to 50% of CPP retirement benefits. The split
between the couple is determined by the number of years they lived
together during the period they were required to contribute to the plan. To
make this election, applicants should complete Form T1032, “Joint Election
to Split Pension Income.”
Investment income
Investments can represent a major source of income for individuals and,
depending on the situation and nature of the investment, special tax
treatment may be available.
Capital gains are also investment income, but they are not considered
income from property.
128
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Dividend income
Lines 120 and 121
129
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Eligible dividends
Non-eligible dividends
EXAMPLE
In 2019, Grant received a non-eligible dividend of $300 from Acorn Inc, a taxable
CCPC. The taxable amount of the dividend is $345, which can be calculated as
follows:
While the impact of the gross-up may at first appear unfair, the dividend
tax credit provides a deduction from income taxes payable.
The dividend gross-up and dividend tax credit system is in place because
the dividend is paid from after-tax corporate earnings. This means the
corporation has already paid tax on its income and uses its after-tax funds
to pay the dividend. To simply include the dividend as income, without any
130
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The grossed-up dividend amount is entered on line 120 of the income tax
return in anticipation of the dividend tax credit applied on line 425 of
Schedule 1 of the income tax return.
EXAMPLE (continued)
Grant’s $300 non-eligible dividend from Acorn generates a $345 grossed-up amount
on line 120 of the income tax return and a $31.15 ($345 x 9.03% = $31.15) federal
dividend tax credit on line 425 of his return.
Estimated federal income taxes $100.05 (assuming a 29% marginal tax rate)
The concern for individuals who receive taxable dividend income is that the
grossed-up amount of the dividend is included in the taxpayer’s net
income for tax purposes, which is the amount the government uses to
establish qualifying income for many social benefits. While the dividend tax
credit later reduces the impact of the gross-up, the dividend tax credit only
adjusts taxes payable.
131
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
individual is receiving Old Age Security benefits or claiming the Age Credit
(both of which are subject to an income test), the taxpayer will have to
include $1,380 of income, which is $380 more than actually received.
While the taxpayer is eligible for a credit that is applied against taxes
payable, this credit does not help when the taxpayer applies for income-
tested benefits and credits.
EXAMPLE
Grant receives $750 (in Canadian dollars) as the net amount from a $1,000 (in
Canadian dollars) dividend from XYZ Corporation, a non-resident corporation. The
country in which XYZ Corporation is located withheld $250 (in Canadian dollars) as
taxes on the $1,000 dividend payment. Grant will report the $1,000 of foreign dividend
income and then claim a foreign tax credit for the $250 withheld by the other country.
132
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Estimated federal taxes: $500 (assuming 50% marginal tax rate, federal and
provincial combined)
Less foreign tax credit: $250 (lesser of $250 (amount withheld) and $500 (tax
otherwise payable)
Stock dividends
The value of a stock dividend paid to a shareholder is established as the
amount of paid-up capital assigned to the shares. The gross-up and
dividend tax credit rules apply to stock dividends, provided that the
corporation qualifies as a taxable Canadian corporation.
It is the company paying the dividend that is obligated to report the stock
dividend on a T5 slip to its shareholders, in a manner similar to the cash
dividend.
Stock split
A stock split is not a taxable event and does not result in an income
inclusion for the taxpayer.
133
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Capital dividends
A capital dividend is a non-taxable dividend when paid to a Canadian
resident taxpayer.
The effect of this election is to remove the dividends from one spouse’s
income and include the dividends in the other spouse’s income. As already
suggested, this transfer can be advantageous when it enables the couple
to claim the credit for the “spouse or common-law partner amount.” If a
taxpayer is eligible for this election, it is wise to calculate the overall
impact for the couple by running a scenario with the transfer and a
scenario without the transfer.
(i.e., a low effective marginal tax rate on taxable dividends). The election
only benefits couples who have an effective marginal tax rate on dividends
that is less than the lowest tax bracket, because it is the lowest tax
bracket that applies to the non-refundable tax credits.
EXAMPLE
The trustee decides to retain $10,000 of dividend income received from a public
Canadian corporation.
135
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Taxable dividends allocated from the trust to the beneficiaries of the trust
retain their character and are taxed in exactly the same way as when
dividends flow directly from the corporation to the beneficiary (i.e.,
dividends from taxable Canadian corporations fall into the gross-up and
dividend tax credit regime, whereas dividends from foreign companies are
treated as regular income with no preferential tax treatment).
EXAMPLE
Alice, who is 23 years old, is an income beneficiary of a trust from which she receives
a regular flow of income. In 2019, she received $7,500 of income from the trust. Of
the $7,500 received, $5,000 was allocated as a taxable dividend income from a
Canadian corporation and the remaining $2,500 was a taxable dividend income from
a foreign corporation. The trust has not yet paid tax on the funds.
136
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The receivable method reports income when the payment is legally due
and enforceable, even if the payment is delayed; it is considered a
receivable on the day it becomes due.
137
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The term accrual refers to income the taxpayer has earned but has not yet
received. For individual taxpayers, the annual accrual basis reports interest
income accrued to each annual anniversary date of an investment
contract. Investment contracts are debt obligations, except for certain
deferred compensation arrangements, employee benefit plans and some
specific instruments.
138
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Total 50.67%
* The 12% rate is an estimate of the provincial tax rate for this example. The taxpayer’s actual
provincial rate would apply in place of the 12%.
139
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The corporation must add the refundable portion (30.67%) of the 50.67%
to its refundable dividend tax on hand (RDTOH) account where it remains
until the corporation later pays taxable dividends to its shareholders. The
refundable portion of 30.67% is derived as 20% of the federal rate plus
the 10.67% additional refundable tax. The corporation is eligible for a
refund of its refundable taxes when it pays taxable dividends. The refund
to the corporation is the lesser of:
EXAMPLE
On October 1, 2019, an investor purchases a $100,000 five-year investment contract
earning 3% interest annually. The interest income on this investment compounds
annually. On October 1, 2024, the investor receives a cheque for $115,927.41,
representing the return of capital plus interest income.
The interest the investor reports throughout the five-year period depends on the type
of taxpayer. In the table below, column A shows the tax reporting of interest income
for a trust, partnership or corporation, assuming a December 31 year-end. Column B
shows the tax reporting for an individual.
140
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Taxation Year A B
2019 $750.00 $0
Column B reports interest income on the anniversary of the contract based on the
amount of interest receivable. There is no interest income reported in the 2019
taxation year because no amount was received, no amount is receivable, and no
anniversary has occurred. The first anniversary is October 1, 2020, at which point
$3,000.00 has been earned. On the second anniversary, $3,090.00 has been earned,
representing 3% on the original capital plus 3% on the amount of interest earned in
the prior year.
Column A reports interest income based on a December 31 fiscal year-end. Under the
accrual method, the investment contract can be viewed as earning 0.25% per month.
The investor held the investment contract for the last three months of 2019, during
which time it earned $750.00 ($100,000 x 0.25% x 3 months). In 2020, the investment
contract earns 0.25% per month on $100,000 for the first nine months, and 0.25% per
month on $103,000 for the last three months. The change in the capital base reflects
the fact that the interest on the contract becomes payable on October 1 every year. In
the last year of the investment contract, the investor holds the investment for nine
months, and at 0.25% per month it earns $2,532.39 ($113,376.44 x 0.25% x 9
months).
141
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Rental income
Lines 126 and 160
If a taxpayer owns real estate rental properties, the net income earned on
the rental properties is included in the taxpayer’s total income. The
taxpayer must complete a detailed schedule, Form T776, to report the
gross rental income, as well as expenses related to the rental operation.
The gross rental income is reported on line 160 and the net rental income
or loss is reported on line 126 of the return. A rental loss is reported as a
negative number and reduces the taxpayer’s income from other sources in
the determination of total income.
When reporting gross rental income, the taxpayer must include any type of
payment received, such as cash or services. An example of a service
received in exchange for rent is a building superintendent who receives a
$500 monthly rent reduction in exchange for services. In this example, the
owner of the building includes $6,000 in gross rental income and $6,000
as expenses for the services provided by the superintendent.
142
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Current expenses are fully deductible in the year incurred, whereas capital
expenditures are deductible over a number of years through the capital
cost allowance system. Replacing a roof or several windows is generally
viewed as a capital expenditure because of the longer-term, enduring
value these activities add to the property.
Property taxes
Mortgage interest
Superintendent
Garbage removal
Office supplies
Painting
Replacing carpet
Disabled Individuals
The Income Tax Act includes specific provisions that allow for the
deduction of expenses related to the costs of modifying a building to
accommodate disabled persons, regardless of whether the expense is
capital in nature. This special provision allows for certain expenses that are
capital in nature to be fully deductible in the year incurred when they
relate to the modification of a property to improve accessibility for disabled
persons. This is known as a tax incentive and is put in place by the
government to encourage certain behaviour.
EXAMPLE
Jerry is the landlord of a triplex where he has a new tenant who requires wheelchair
access into and throughout the building. Jerry spent $35,000 to add new structures in
and around the property to make it wheelchair accessible. The expenses he incurred
would normally be considered capital in nature. However, because these
expenditures relate to improvements to accommodate persons with disabilities, Jerry
can deduct the full $35,000 in the year he incurred the expenses.
Expenditures that are capital in nature are deducted over a period of time
by using the capital cost allowance (CCA) system. The Income Tax Act
prescribes how much of a capital asset’s cost a taxpayer can deduct each
tax year by assigning a capital cost allowance rate to different classes of
assets. For example, a building is class 1 and has a rate of 4%, while
general equipment is class 8 and has a rate of 20%.
144
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Marvin buys a building for $100,000 and can claim the following CCA amounts over
the next several years.
Only ½ of the CCA otherwise determined can be claimed in the year of acquisition.
145
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
A recapture arises when the lower of cost and proceeds is deducted from
the undepreciated capital cost balance, and the outcome is a negative
number.
EXAMPLE
Donna recently sold a rental property for proceeds of $1,000,000, of which $500,000
relates to the building. When Donna purchased the property, she paid $250,000 in
respect of the building. She has claimed CCA annually throughout the time she has
owned the building, and her UCC balance was $200,000 at the time she sold the
property.
= UCC balance ($200,000) less (the lower of cost ($250,000) and proceeds
($500,000))
= ($50,000) negative
146
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
In this case, Donna had claimed $50,000 of CCA throughout the time she owned the
building. This means she was able to deduct $50,000 from the rental income she
earned on the property, lowering her taxes payable throughout the ownership period.
However, she has now disposed of the property, and the recapture calculation shows
that Donna must recapture $50,000 of the previously claimed CCA.
The $50,000 recaptured amount will be added to Donna’s income in the year the
property is sold and is fully taxable. This recaptured amount is separate from the
$250,000 capital gain on the building, which is calculated as the proceeds ($500,000)
less adjusted cost base ($250,000).
When recapture applies, it effectively means the property has been “over-
depreciated.”
Taxpayers can rent out a portion of their home and earn rental income or
suffer a rental loss. If taxpayers rent out a portion of their home, they are
entitled to deduct reasonable expenses against the gross rental income.
Taxpayers calculate the total expenses incurred and pro-rate those
expenses between personal and rental. They can base the ratio on the
number of rooms in the home or the number of square feet in the home.
147
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
If the above conditions are not met, a change in use could apply to the
taxpayer’s principal residence, which means a deemed disposition of the
capital property (the residence) may occur along with the loss of a portion
or all of the principal residence exemption. A deemed disposition could
result in the situation where the property is deemed to have been sold for
fair market value, which may trigger any accrued capital gain or the
recapture of previously claimed capital cost allowance.
The Canada Revenue Agency’s position is that it will not apply the change
in use rules unless the taxpayer claims capital cost allowance on any
portion of income derived from a principal residence. The deemed
disposition rule applies immediately when there is a change in use to an
income producing property.
148
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Non-deductible expenses
This section briefly reviews some of the more important issues with
respect to reporting taxable capital gains on a tax return. A section later in
this module offers more in-depth coverage.
149
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The Income Tax Act prescribes an inclusion rate, which is a set percentage
of the capital gain that must be brought into income. The inclusion rate is
currently 50%. Continuing the above example, the $1,000 capital gain is
multiplied by the 50% inclusion rate to derive a $500 taxable capital gain.
The reason for the inclusion rate is to tax only part of the “profit” realized
on the sale of an asset. Capital gains are not fully taxed in order to
encourage investment in capital property and to reflect the fact that asset
values are subject to inflationary influences. These inflationary influences
inflate the value of the asset over time without increasing the wealth or
purchasing power of the asset’s owner.
For example, suppose a taxpayer buys real property for $100,000 and
several years later discovers the value of the property has increased in
exact tandem with the annual inflation rate. In 20 years, the property is
worth $180,000. If the taxpayer sells the property, he or she would realize
a capital gain of $80,000, even though the purchasing power of the
$180,000 today is exactly equivalent to the purchasing power of $100,000
20 years earlier. There is no change in the taxpayer’s wealth, but he or
she must potentially pay tax on the inflationary gain.
150
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The inclusion rate reflects government policy to avoid taxing inflation and,
as already suggested, to encourage capital investment.
Capital property
The Income Tax Act does not specifically define what constitutes a capital
gain. Rather, it merely lays out the provisions describe how a capital gain
is to be treated once it has occurred.
151
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Support payments fall into two categories: spousal support and child
support. The distinction relates to their taxation, with the tax treatment of
spousal support differing from the tax treatment of child support. Spousal
support payments are tax-deductible by the payer and taxable to the
recipient. Child support payments are not tax-deductible by the payer, nor
are they taxable to the recipient.
152
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Made for the support and maintenance of the recipient, with the
recipient having full discretion as to the use of the proceeds
While the recipient must have the right to determine the use of the funds,
there are limited circumstances where payments can be made to a third-
party in a way that limits the recipient’s discretionary use of the funds. In
such a case, the payment to the third-party must be pursuant to a written
agreement or court order. Examples of these types of payments could
include rent, property taxes, insurance premiums, education or medical
expenses, and maintenance costs for the former spouse’s home.
Definitions
The term spouse means a person to whom the taxpayer is legally married,
so the term former spouse means a person to whom the taxpayer had
previously legally married. The term common-law partner includes a
person who has cohabited in a conjugal relationship with the taxpayer
throughout a continuous period of at least 12 months, or who is a person
who is cohabiting in a conjugal relationship with the taxpayer and is the
parent of a child of the taxpayer. Once individuals fall within the definition
153
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Child support payments are not deductible by the payer nor taxable to the
recipient under any circumstances. These income tax rules apply
automatically to child support payments made in accordance with an
agreement or court order (federal or provincial) made on or after May 1,
1997. As such, child support payments are not taxable income for the
receiving parent and cannot be claimed as a tax deduction by the paying
parent.
Definition
154
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Under the terms of his agreement, Chin must make monthly child support payments
of $2,000 ($24,000 annually) and monthly spousal support payments of $1,200
($14,400 annually). Unfortunately, Chin experienced a shortfall in his income during
the year and was only able to pay $28,000 towards his support obligations. For
income tax purposes, Chin is deemed to have paid:
Other income
Line 130
The tax return does not have a separate line for every possible type of
income. The following is a list of the more common types of other income
taxpayers must include.
155
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Scholarships
Apprenticeship grants
There are several types of grants available from the federal government to
apprentices for items such as tuition, travel, tools or other expenses.
156
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Self-employment
Lines 135 to 143
In all cases, both the gross amount (before expenses) and the net amount
(after expenses) must be entered on the appropriate lines of the return.
Business income
Lines 162 and 135
157
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Defining a business
Maintaining records
158
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Cautions
159
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
For the last six months of 2019, Mohsin Kahn operated an unincorporated boat
charter business. Mohsin’s statement of income was as follows:
Expenses
Rent $12,300
Administration $9,800
Heat $8,800
Maintenance $9,600
Insurance $1,200
Reasonable expenses
160
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Supplies Travel
Telephone Internet
Relationship Impact
162
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
While not a Canada Revenue Agency audit issue, employees are typically
eligible for minimum amounts of paid vacation time, along with notice
and/or severance in respect of termination of employment. Self-employed
individuals are not eligible for these types of benefits and/or payments
under provincial labour laws. This can create issues for employers who
may owe vacation or severance pay to a worker, if a working relationship
is re-defined to be that of an employee-employer instead of a self-
employed contractor.
163
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Ownership of tools and equipment: Who owns the tools and equipment
the worker uses when performing the services?
Control: What level of control does the payer exercise over the worker?
What degree of independence does the worker have in determining
when and how the work is completed?
Financial risk: What degree of true financial risk does the worker
assume within the relationship? Who pays for the expenses the worker
incurs?
Opportunity for profit: What profit potential arises for the worker
through the relationship the worker has with the payer?
Ongoing relationship: Does the worker have any other clients? What
percentage of the worker’s gross income arises from the relationship
with the payer?
Professional income
Lines 164 and 137
Commission income
Lines 166 and 139
165
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
During the 2019 tax year, Mahood earned commission sales income of $62,000. On
December 31, he had not yet received $7,000 of the $62,000, although he was very
confident he would receive it eventually. Mahood knows that commission sales agents
are allowed to use the cash method of accounting, so he reports $55,000 of gross
revenue ($62,000 less $7,000 not yet received).
Since he has chosen to report income using the cash method, he must also report
expenses using the cash method. Therefore, Mahood can only deduct expenses he
actually paid.
During 2019, Mahood operated from rented premises for the entire 12 months. His
cash flow was tight, so the landlord allowed him to defer rent payments for two
months (November and December), until his cash flow picks up. Although Mahood
has an obligation to eventually pay the rent for November and December, he can only
deduct the 10 months of rent (January to October) he actually paid as expenses for
2019.
Farming income
Lines 168 and 141
Tree farming
166
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Livestock purchases
Crop insurance
Pesticides
Electricity
Small tools
167
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
A restricted farm loss can occur when the taxpayer’s chief source of
income is neither farming nor a combination of farming and some other
source of income. The term “chief source” generally means 50%.
Taxpayers can carry any unused restricted farm loss back three years or
forward 20 years and claim it against farming income in those years.
Fishing income
Lines 170 and 143
Fishing income includes income earned from fishing for or catching any of
the following:
Shellfish
Crustaceans
168
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Marine animals
Fuel costs
Insurance
Office expenses
Fishing gear
169
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Global criteria
The workspace is where the individual primarily (more than 50% of the
time) does his or her work
170
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Self-employed
Employee (non-commission)
171
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Commission employee
For the floor space option, compare the portion of the home used for office
space with the total floor space of the home to arrive at a ratio. For
example, if an individual uses a 400-square-foot home office in a 4,000-
square-foot home, and the space qualifies as a deductible workspace, then
10% (400 ÷ 4,000) of reasonable eligible expenses are deductible.
172
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Hannah, a self-employed electrician, operates her business from the 150-square-foot
den in her 2,000-square-foot home. Her home has a total of eight rooms, of which the
den is one. Based on floor space, Hannah could use a ratio of 7.5% (150 ÷ 2,000).
Alternatively, she could use the number of rooms, resulting in a ratio of 12.5% (1 ÷ 8).
Assume Hannah has eligible home office expenses that total $18,000, before
applying the ratio. If Hannah bases the ratio on the number of rooms, she can claim a
$2,250 (12.5% x $18,000) deduction for expenses associated with her home office
workspace. If she bases the ratio on floor space, she can only claim $1,350 (7.5% x
$18,000).
It is obviously more advantageous for Hannah to base the ratio on the number of
rooms. Once she has made that choice, however, she must apply it consistently.
Other considerations
173
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Hannah, the self-employed electrician, has a net income of $1,500, before applying
the deduction for workspace in the home. From the previous example, we know
Hannah is eligible to claim a $2,250 (12.5% of $18,000) deduction of expenses
associated with her home office. Given that her net income is only $1,500, the
maximum deduction Hannah can claim for workspace in the home this year is $1,500.
She can carry forward the remaining $750 ($2,250 – $1,500) indefinitely.
EXAMPLE
Marty is a records librarian who is an employee of Community Hospital, located 100
kilometres from his home. Due to the distance, Marty works from home and goes to
the hospital only for the occasional meeting. Assume that Marty meets the criteria to
claim a deduction for workspace in the home and can claim 14% of eligible expenses
based on floor space.
If Marty’s eligible home office expenses are $24,000, then he can claim a deduction of
$3,360 (14% x $24,000). He cannot use this $3,360 to create a loss from
employment.
174
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Mortgage principal No No No
CCA Yes No No
This table assumes the individual meets the global and other criteria to be eligible to
deduct qualifying expenses.
Non-taxable income
Some income sources are not taxable. Examples include:
Structured settlements
Lottery winnings
Life insurance proceeds arising from the death of the life insured
GST/HST credit
175
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
While these types of income are not taxable, subsequent income earned on
these amounts is taxable. Investment earnings arising from the
investment of receipts that were originally non-taxable amounts will
increase a taxpayer’s overall income for a taxation year and subsequently
increase the taxpayer’s income tax liability.
176
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Planning for students and planning for individuals with disabilities will be
different depending on their age and point in their life cycle. In the figure,
the income tax consequences under Students and Disabled refer to items
unique to these categories of individuals, but these individuals may also
fall under other categories within the life cycle for financial planning.
177
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Figure 6: Income Impact
Income Impact
Increase
POTENTIAL Increase Income
Unique Circumstances Stage of Life Cycle Income Tax Other Notes
Type of Income Inclusion for Recipient of the Income for Tax Purposes
Liability
Mature,
Mature,
Module 9: Taxation
178
1 1 1 1 1 1 RRSP Life Long Learning Plan, missed re-payment) Yes Yes
1 1 1 1 RRIF Income Yes Yes
1 1 RDSP payment of grant, bond, investment earnings, proceeds from rollover No No
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) withdrawals No No
1 1 Scholarships, bursaries, grants (qualifying students) No No
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dividends, Taxable from Taxable Canadian Corporation Yes Yes The dividend gross-up and dividend tax credit scheme applies
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dividends, Non-taxable (Capital Dividends) No No Typically a shareholder of a private company
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dividends, from non-resident corporation Yes Yes Investors
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dividends, Stock Dividends Yes Yes Typically a shareholder of a private company
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Investment earnings on amounts originally received as non-taxable amounts Yes Yes
1 1 1 CPP retirment income Yes Yes
1 1 1 CPP disability income Yes Yes
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CPP death benefit Yes Yes
1 1 1 Old Age Security Yes Yes Income tested
1 RCA payment Yes Yes
1 Awards for personal injury No No
1 Structured settlements No No
1 Lottery winnings No No Once proceeds invested, earnings on investment are taxable
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Life insurance proceeds No No
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 GST/HST credit No No
1 1 Canada Child Benefits (CCB) No No
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Amounts received from inheritances No No
1 Workers compensation Generally No Generally NO
The term seniors, too, can be misleading and is often misused. There is
nothing in the Income Tax Act that defines senior, and referring to an
individual age 50, 55, 60 or 65 as a senior could be viewed as biased.
Financial planning should focus on the individual or family’s stage in the
life cycle and take into consideration additional unique circumstances.
The term mid-life is used for those who have reached the point of mid-life
in terms of age. Typically, this group has passed the point of raising
children and may have reached the empty-nest stage or may never have
had children.
The term mature, still working describes those in the pre-retirement phase
of life but are still employed or active in business with some regularity. The
term mature, no longer working describes those who are older and no
longer employed or active in business. Retirement is not a point in time,
but rather a phase. Furthermore, individuals are working longer, well past
what has been viewed as traditional retirement ages of 60 to 65.
Just because a category is not ticked off in the figure, it does not suggest
the category could never apply. For example, a mature individual could be
an older parent, or a mature individual who is a grandparent could be
raising his or her grandchildren. Either situation could affect the
individual’s income. The figure works on the premise that these situations
tend to be the exception rather than the norm.
179
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Students
For students, common types of income related to their role include
employment income, tips and gratuities, income from a Registered
Education Savings Plan (RESP), scholarships, fellowships, bursaries and
study grants such as an artists’ project grant or apprenticeship grant.
Employees
For employees, common types of income related to their role include
employment income, tips and gratuities, and taxable benefits and allowances.
180
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The term deduction refers to an amount taxpayers can use to lower either
their net income for tax purposes or their taxable income, depending on
where in the formula the deduction applies. Since a deduction reduces the
amount of income that is subject to taxation, it reduces the taxpayer’s
income tax liability at the marginal tax rate. As such, the higher the
taxpayer’s marginal tax rate, the greater the tax savings to the taxpayer.
A tax deduction differs from a tax credit, because a tax credit directly
reduces the total amount of taxes owing. Tax credits do not affect the
calculation of a taxpayer’s income, but rather affect the calculation of
taxes owing after calculating income. This module discusses tax credits
later in this section.
181
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Rachel, who is in the 50% marginal tax bracket, is eligible to claim a $1,000 tax
deduction. The deduction reduces Rachel’s income by $1,000 and, based on her
marginal rate of tax, the effect is tax savings of $500 ($1,000 x 50%). Therefore,
claiming the deduction reduces Rachel’s income tax liability by $500.
Figure 7 shows an excerpt from the 2018 tax return that depicts the
calculation of net income for tax purposes (for a person living in Nova
Scotia). This section of the return begins with the taxpayer’s total income
and applies a series of deductions to derive the taxpayer’s net income.
The line items in this section of the return represent some of the available
deductions. Any deduction not specifically listed goes on line 232, Other
deductions.
182
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
A taxpayer may not contribute to an RRSP after the end of the year in
which the annuitant turns age 71, and the plan must mature by the end of
the year in which the annuitant turns age 71. Similarly, RPPs and DPSPs
must generally start paying benefits to members by the end of the year in
which members turn age 71.
The pension income split does not have to be 50/50, although both
spouses or common-law partners must agree to the allocation in their tax
183
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
This income splitting opportunity can be helpful as the income retains its
character. This means a spouse who might otherwise not have pension
income can receive transferred income and use it to claim the $2,000
pension income credit.
Note, however, that the minimum age for splitting RRSP annuity, RRIF and
LIF income is age 65 and older. As discussed earlier, the reason for this
age restriction is that individuals have much greater personal control over
the timing of withdrawals from RRSPs, RRIFs and LIFs when compared
with RPPs. Without the age 65 eligibility rule, many individuals who are not
yet retired could gain significant tax advantages well before they reach age
65 by arranging to withdraw money each year as RRSP annuity or RRIF
income while still saving for retirement.
While there is no requirement that individuals must retire at age 65, the
federal government and most provinces use age 65 as the minimum
eligible age for many benefits associated with retirement. However, an
increasing number of individuals are delaying retirement beyond age 65.
This presents planners with an opportunity to evaluate whether strategies
to create eligible pension income might be beneficial. For example, by
triggering some RRIF income during the year, an individual may be able to
claim the pension income credit and/or transfer qualifying pension income
for income splitting purposes. It is important to assess the individual’s
specific circumstances to determine if this type of strategy is beneficial.
Individuals receiving RPP income, on the other hand, generally have little
control over the timing of their pension payments. RPP income is more
commonly received only after retirement. Individuals cannot access RPP
money on an as-needed basis nor on a partial pension basis; in contrast,
184
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Trade union dues are tax-deductible provided that the employer withholds
and remits the dues pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement.
Typically, dues paid appear in box 44 of a T4 slip.
In both cases, dues must pay for the ordinary operating expenses of the
union or professional association to be deductible.
Eligibility
Taxpayers may be eligible to deduct child care expenses in the year they
incur the expense, provided that they incur the expense to allow one of the
parents (or supporting individuals) to do any one of the following:
Carry on a business
Deduction amount
The maximum amount of the deduction for eligible childcare expenses is
the least of (a), (b) and (c):
$8,000 (2019 amount) for each child under age seven at the end of
the taxation year, provided the child did not qualify for the disability
tax credit
$5,000 (2019 amount) for each child over age six at the end of the
taxation year and under age 16 at any time during the taxation year,
provided the child did not qualify for the disability tax credit
$5,000 (2019 amount) for each child over age 15 throughout the
year who has a physical or mental infirmity and is dependent on the
taxpayer or taxpayer’s spouse or common-law partner, provided the
child did not qualify for the disability tax credit
$11,000 (2019 amount) for each eligible child for whom anyone is
entitled to claim a disability tax credit
A claim for childcare expenses may reduce entitlement to the disability tax
credit supplement, which is available to some individuals under age 18 at
the end of the year when they have a severe and prolonged impairment in
a mental or physical function.
Part (b) above is based on the formula outlined above regardless of the
actual expenses incurred. If, for example, a parent has three children ages
4, 8 and 14, the formula used to calculate the part B above includes all
186
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
three children, even if the parent only incurs childcare expenses in respect
of the 4 and 8-year-old.
Part (c) above is based on the taxpayer’s earned income, where the term
earned income is defined within the Income Tax Act for purposes of this
specific deduction. As the term suggests, earned income for purposes of
part (c) must be income earned (not passive income from investments)
and includes items such as:
Types of expenses
Childcare expenses include payments to the following:
187
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Person under age 18 who is related to the taxpayer, where the term
related falls within the Income Tax Act’s definition of related.
$275 (2019 amount) per week for each child for whom the disability
tax credit can be claimed
$200 (2019 amount) per week for each child who is under age seven at
the end of the year
188
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Living apart from the higher-income parent at the end of the year and
for at least 90 days that began in the year due to a relationship
breakdown
Lessor of:
a) The maximum otherwise determined (i.e., $8,000 per child under age
7, $5,000 per child over age six and under age 16, $5,000 per
dependent child over age 15 with a physical or mental infirmity, and
$11,000 per child for whom anyone is entitled to claim a disability tax
credit) times 2.5% times the number of:
Months the lower-income spouse was enrolled in a part-time
educational program, plus
Weeks the lower-income spouse was enrolled in a full-time
educational program, plus
Weeks the lower-income spouse was not capable of caring for
the children because of an impairment in physical or mental
function, plus
189
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
The Chen family has one child, Daniel, age nine. Daniel attended overnight camp for
four weeks this past summer, at a cost of $700 per week, while his parents both
worked. Daniel’s mother earns $85,000, while his father earns $91,000. Daniel’s
mother can claim a childcare expense of $500 ($125 per week maximum for overnight
camp).
EXAMPLE
Shelby’s earned income was $9,000, while her spouse, Sandy, earned $53,000. To
allow Shelby to work, they incurred childcare expenses of $12,000 for the daycare
that three-year-old Christy attended and $3,000 for after-school care for six-year-old
Connor. The maximum amount that Shelby can claim for childcare expenses is
$6,000, the least of $15,000 (actual expenses incurred), $16,000 (2 children under
age 7, maximum $8,000 each) and $6,000 (2/3 x earned income of $9,000).
190
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
research for which they received a grant. This deduction is only available
to the person with the disability.
Types of expenses
Examples of eligible expenses include bliss symbol boards, braille note-taker
devices, braille printers, synthetic speech systems, devices or software,
electronic speech synthesizers, optical scanners, page turner devices and
teletypewriters.
Other types of devices include reading and tutoring services, talking
textbooks or voice recognition software.
Deduction amount
The deduction amount is limited to the lesser of:
A taxpayer does not need to qualify for the disability amount to be eligible
for this deduction, unless he or she is claiming part-time attendant care
expenses.
191
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The general rule is that taxpayers who incur a capital gain must include
50% of that gain, referred to as a taxable capital gain, in their reported
income. When there is a capital loss, a similar rule applies: 50% of the
capital loss, referred to as an allowable capital loss, can be claimed against
taxable capital gains. When there is no taxable capital gain in the current
taxation year against which an allowable capital loss may be claimed, the
allowable capital loss may be carried back three years to offset any taxable
capital gains incurred in the three previous years. Or, alternatively, the
allowable capital loss becomes a net capital loss that can be carried
forward indefinitely.
In simple terms, a business investment loss is a capital loss that meets the
conditions outlined in the paragraph above. While 50% of a capital loss is
referred to as an allowable capital loss, 50% of a business investment loss
is referred to as an allowable business investment loss (ABIL). An ABIL
may be deducted against all sources of income in the year it is incurred.
192
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Moving expenses
Line 219
Qualifying moves
A taxpayer who moves from one location in Canada to another may qualify
to deduct eligible moving expenses. Moves that qualify include:
193
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
For taxpayers other than students, the move can be within Canada, from
Canada, to Canada or between two locations outside of Canada. When the
move involves a location outside of Canada, the taxpayer must be a
deemed or factual resident of Canada to be eligible for the deduction. In
addition, the move must be from a place where the taxpayer ordinarily
resided to another place where the taxpayer will ordinarily reside.
For students, the move can be within Canada or outside of Canada. When
the move is to attend a post-secondary institution outside of Canada, the
student must be a deemed or factual resident of Canada to be eligible for
the deduction.
Timing of deduction
Moving expenses can be deducted in the year of the move against income
earned from employment at the new work location.
194
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Qualifying expenses
A taxpayer may not deduct any expense for which he or she receives
reimbursement (i.e., when the employer covers the expense). There is a
specific list of the types of expenses that qualify for the moving deduction.
Examples include:
195
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Supporting documentation
Taxpayers may claim actual expenses for meals and vehicle costs incurred
by submitting supporting receipts. Alternatively, the Canada Revenue
Agency offers a simplified method under which taxpayers may claim a per-
person flat amount using prescribed formulas to calculate costs without the
need to retain and submit supporting receipts.
Note, however, that if a taxpayer uses the simplified method, the Canada
Revenue Agency may still request that the taxpayer provide reasonable
documentation to support the claim.
2019 rates
Mileage rates depend on the province or territory in which the move
originates, and range from $0.48 to $0.645 per kilometre. Meals are set at
$17 per meal to a maximum of $51 per day for each individual in the
family.
EXAMPLE
Sivy has accepted a new position as a controller at a company located in another city.
From her current home, Sivy faces a 100-kilometre commute to her new job. If Sivy
decides to move closer to her new employer to reduce her commute, she will have
more time for her family and friends.
For eligible expenses associated with the move to be tax-deductible, Sivy must meet
the distance criteria. As long as the commute between Sivy’s new residence and new
work location is 60 kilometres or less (measured using the shortest normal route
196
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
available to the travelling public), her eligible moving expenses will qualify as tax-
deductible.
Support payments
Line 220
Certain support payments are tax deductible. See the “Taxable support
payments” section for a discussion of the associated rules.
EXAMPLE
Wilson and Gail were married for nine years before they separated in July of last year.
Based on a verbal agreement that Wilson and Gail negotiated, Wilson pays Gail a
support payment of $1,200 per month, although they did not specifically allocate this
amount between child support and spousal support. Wilson paid Gail $6,000 for the
period August to December of last year.
In the absence of a written agreement stipulating child support and spousal support
amounts, the Canada Revenue Agency assumes the entire payment to be child
support, which is not taxable to Ellen nor tax-deductible for Sam.
197
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
When a corporation has a specific policy that states dividends will not be
paid on its shares, the potential for dividend income is eliminated and any
interest on money borrowed to purchase those shares is not deductible.
Traceable
The primary consideration when assessing the deductibility of interest or
carrying charges is that the borrowed funds must be clearly traceable to an
income-producing business or property.
When the connection between the interest paid on the money borrowed
and the income-producing property is eroded, the deductibility of the
interest can and often is challenged by the Canada Revenue Agency.
198
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
199
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Commission employees
If employees who earn commissions are contractually obligated under the
terms of their employment agreement to pay for their own expenses, and
are ordinarily required to carry on employment duties away from the
employer’s place of business, they may have expenses that can be
deducted on line 229.
200
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
201
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Regular employees
Regular employees may deduct automobile expenses incurred for travelling
in the course of employment if an automobile is ordinarily required to carry
on the duties of employment away from the employer’s place of business.
In addition, the employee must be under an employment contract that
requires him or her to pay motor vehicle expenses the employer does not
adequately reimburse or cover with an allowance.
Special situations
Transportation employees may claim the cost of meals and lodging against
their employment income if their job requires them to regularly travel
away from their municipality and regularly pay their own travel expenses.
Forestry employees may claim the cost of buying and using a power saw if
they use the saw to earn employment income and their job mandates that
they purchase a saw.
Employed artists may claim related expenses but are limited to the lesser
of $1,000 and 20% of their artist employment income.
Employed tradespersons may claim the cost of eligible tools that they are
required to purchase to perform their job.
Compliance requirement
An employee’s eligibility to deduct any of these expenses must be
supported with a T2200, “Declaration of Conditions of Employment,”
completed and signed by his or her employer.
Summary
Table 11 summarizes an employee’s opportunity to deduct expenses his or
her employer does not reimburse.
202
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Workspace in the
Same as regular employee
home (discussed Rent, repairs,
plus insurance, property
earlier in module) — maintenance, supplies,
taxes and mortgage
portion of total home utilities
interest
expenses
Advertising and
X
promotion
Motor vehicle
X X
expenses
Lodging X
Parking X
Supplies X
Professional
membership dues or X X
union dues
Other expenses
directly related to
X
earning the
commission income
203
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Other deductions
Line 232
The repayment for Old Age Security benefits is 15% of the amount by
which an individual’s annual net income, including Old Age Security
benefits, exceeds a minimum level. Since 2000, the annual clawback
threshold has been indexed to changes in the Consumer Price Index. For
2019, the minimum threshold is $77,580. An individual with a net income
below the minimum threshold is not subject to any clawback on Old Age
Security benefits for that year.
204
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
There are some exemptions for the repayment. For example, amounts the
taxpayer received as special benefits from Employment Insurance such as
maternity, parental, sickness, compassionate care or parents of critically ill
children benefits are not repayable.
205
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
206
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Recall that taxpayers can carry net capital losses and non-capital losses
forward and backwards when they are unable to use them in the year they
are incurred. It is in this spot on the tax return that the carryforward and
carryback amounts can be utilized. These losses are a deduction from net
income in the determination of taxable income.
The Income Tax Act contains special rules that allow Canadians to avoid
tax on capital gains on shares of a qualified small business corporation
(QSBC) up to a maximum of $866,912 (2019 amount) and on qualified
farm and fishing property (QFFP) up to a maximum of $1,000,000 (2019
amount).
207
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
208
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Up to $47,630 15%
Table 12 works very simply: each tax bracket has its own tax rate for
income falling within the band. Total federal tax payable is the sum of the
brackets.
EXAMPLE
Barbara has $150,000 of taxable income. Using Table 12, calculate her federal tax
payable.
The first $47,630 of Barbara’s income is taxed at 15%, creating a tax liability of
$7,144.50. Because her income exceeds $47,630, the calculation of her federal tax
liability continues into the subsequent bracket.
The amount of Barbara’s taxable income that falls between $47,630 and $95,259 is
taxed at 20.5%, resulting in federal taxes owing of $9,763.94.
This process continues into the third bracket, where Barbara’s income between
$95,259 and $147,667 is taxed at 26%, resulting in $13,626.08 of federal taxes.
There is still a small amount of Barbara’s $150,000 of taxable income not yet taxed,
so the calculation moves into the fourth bracket with the remaining $2,333 of taxable
income not yet captured ($150,000 less $147,667). This remaining amount of $2,333
is subject to federal tax at 29%, creating an additional liability of $676.57
209
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Once the tax liability is calculated at each bracket, the liability is summed to derive a
total federal tax liability of $31,211.09.
Barbara’s marginal federal tax rate is 29%. Why? Because the next dollar of income
Barbara earns will be taxed at 29%.
Barbara’s average federal tax rate is 20.8% (Total federal tax liability ÷ Total taxable
income = $31,211.09 ÷ $150,000).
The provinces are free to create their own tax brackets and corresponding
tax rates; however, provincial tax is calculated on the taxable income
reported for federal tax purposes.
210
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Tax credits are used to reduce taxes owing. Most tax credits are non-
refundable, which means that the tax credits can only be used to reduce
taxes owing; once the taxpayer’s taxes are at zero, the credit no longer
has any value to the taxpayer. With non-refundable tax credits, if the
taxpayer owes no tax, in many cases the benefit of the credit is lost.
There are a few refundable tax credits. Refundable tax credits have value
even after the taxpayer’s taxes are reduced to zero. The credits are first
applied against taxes owing and, if the taxes owing reach zero, the credit
is applied as a refund to the taxpayer.
211
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Charitable donations are the one exception where the tax credit rate differs
from the standard 15%. Instead, charitable donations use a unique three-
tier structure to derive the total value of the tax credit (discussed under
“Donations and gifts” later in this section).
Age amount
Line 301
Taxpayers who reach age 65 before the end of the taxation year may claim
an age amount tax credit, subject to an income threshold. The federal age
amount is $7,494 (2019 amount).
The age amount is reduced by 15% of the taxpayer’s net income in excess
of $37,790. This means that:
If the individual’s income is over $87,750, the age amount tax credit is
nil
212
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Amber, who is 75 years old, has a net income of $50,000.
The age tax credit for Amber’s age amount tax credit is $5,662 x 15% = $849. This
means Amber can reduce her federal taxes owing by $849.
If a taxpayer is entitled to an age amount but cannot fully use the tax
credit because the sum of non-refundable tax credits exceeds taxes
payable, then the taxpayer’s spouse or common-law partner may claim all
or a portion of the taxpayer’s age amount.
The credit is applicable in the year of marriage, throughout the time the
couple is together, and in the year of relationship breakdown, if any.
213
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Clive’s spouse has net income of $4,500. Assume the caregiver amount does not
apply.
214
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Whether other credits are being claimed for the other person
Additional rules apply to a taxpayer claiming this credit when the taxpayer
is required to pay child support or has shared custody of the child for
whom the credit is being claimed.
When a claim is for a child under age 18, the doctor’s statement would
typically include information to indicate that the child’s impairment makes
the child dependent on others currently, and for an indefinite duration, and
that the child requires more personal assistance than other children of the
same age.
215
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The person for whom the taxpayer wants to make the claim is a
common-law partner (use line 303 instead)
The claim relates to a child for whom the taxpayer is required to make
support payments (alternatives may be available)
216
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
For 2019, the amount for an eligible dependant is $12,069 ($14,299 if the
caregiver amount applies). The amount is reduced by the dependant’s net
income. A claim cannot be made when the dependant’s net income is more
than $12,069 ($14,299 if the caregiver amount applies).
A taxpayer can claim an amount for infirm dependants who are under age
18 at the end of the taxation year, and who are dependent on the taxpayer
because of physical or mental function. It is not necessary for the
dependant and the taxpayer to live in the same residence for the purposes
of this tax credit. However, the taxpayer’s claim for the infirm dependant
tax credit is reduced by an amount related to the dependant’s income for
the year.
For 2019, the CPP/QPP contribution limit is the lesser of the amount
actually paid and $2,748.90.
217
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
For 2019, the Employment Insurance premium is the lesser of the amount
actually paid and $860.22.
Taxpayers who meet the required definitions for these roles can claim a
tax credit of $3,000 (2019 amount). To be eligible, the taxpayer must
meet both of the following criteria:
218
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The home buyers’ amount is a credit for individuals who have purchased a
qualifying home in the year and meet both of the following conditions:
The first-time home buyer requirement does not apply when the taxpayer
is eligible for the disability tax credit or the taxpayer acquired the home for
the benefit of a related person who is eligible for the disability tax credit.
The purchase must, however, be made to allow the individual with a
disability to live in a home that is more accessible or better suited to his or
her needs.
The intention must be for the taxpayer or the related person with the
disability to occupy the home as a principal residence no later than one
year after it is acquired.
219
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The pension income amount provides a tax credit to taxpayers who have
claimed eligible pension income on line 115, line 116 and/or line 129 of
their return. The types of income that qualify as pension income for
purposes of this tax credit differ for taxpayers under age 65 and taxpayers
age 65 and over at the end of the taxation year.
Amounts such as Old Age Security, CPP, death benefits and retiring
allowances do not qualify for the pension income amount tax credit.
$2,000
220
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Under age 65
For individuals who are under age 65 at the end of the taxation year, the
pension income amount is the lesser of:
$2,000
Family effect
Pension income splitting may allow couples to reduce their combined taxes
by transferring all or a part of their eligible pension income, which does not
include income from the CPP or Old Age Security programs, to the lower-
income spouse or common-law partner for income tax purposes (see line
326).
221
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
To claim the disability amount, the taxpayer must submit Form T2201,
“Disability Tax Credit Certificate.” A qualified person (i.e., a medical
physician) must complete and provide an original signature on Part B of
the form. If the disabled taxpayer has limited or no taxable income, the
disability amount can be transferred in some situations.
Generally, the amount of the disability tax credit that may be claimed by
the supporting individual is the amount not needed to reduce the income
tax liability of the person with a disability to zero after deducting only the
basic personal amount and the pension income amount.
222
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Qualifying loans
A taxpayer is eligible to claim an amount for interest paid on a qualifying
student loan in the current taxation year or any of the preceding five years
(provided the amount has not been claimed previously). The loan interest
must be in respect of loans for post-secondary education received under
the Canada Student Loans Act, Canada Student Financial Assistance Act,
Apprentice Loans Act or a similar provincial or territorial government law.
Payer of interest
The interest may be paid by the taxpayer or by an individual related to the
taxpayer, although only the taxpayer may claim the respective tax credit.
Carryfoward
The five-year carryforward period is helpful as it allows taxpayers to
optimize the value of the credit. In years when taxpayers have interest
expense but no tax payable for the year, they should not claim this tax
credit. Instead, they should carry it forward to a future year when they
have income and taxes payable.
The carryfoward can, for example, be beneficial to new graduates who are
not yet employed or who find employment late in the year, taxpayers on
maternity or paternity leave or taxpayers who are unemployed with little
or no income during the year.
Interest amounts paid can be carried forward and applied on a return for
any of the next five years following the year of payment.
223
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Non-eligible loans
This credit is not available for loans other than those described under
“Qualifying loans.” As such, the following types of loans do not qualify:
A student loan that has been combined with another kind of loan
Planning considerations
The credit for interest paid on student loans can be beneficial to a taxpayer
and should be a consideration when evaluating options for financial
support related to post-secondary education costs. If the student can
qualify, applying for loans through the Canada Student Loans Act, Canada
Student Financial Assistance Act, Apprentice Loans Act or a similar
provincial or territorial government law, may be more beneficial than
private or commercial loans because of this credit.
Tuition amount
Line 323
A taxpayer may be entitled to claim a tax credit for tuition based on the
type of educational program in which he or she is enrolled. The educational
program must be at a post-secondary level or improve the taxpayer’s skills
in an occupation. In addition, the tuition fees must be more than $100 for
each educational institution.
224
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
To the extent that the taxpayer’s employer pays the tuition and the
amount does not create a taxable benefit, the tuition tax credit is not
available to the taxpayer. In other words, if the taxpayer did not incur a
tuition expense, there is no credit available.
To the extent that a taxpayer’s tax credits are greater than his or her
federal income tax liability, the taxpayer may be eligible to transfer some
unused amounts to his or her spouse or common-law partner. The
following tax credits are eligible for transfer:
Age amount
Tuition amount
To the extent that a taxpayer’s tax credits for tuition and education are
greater than his or her federal income tax liability, the taxpayer may be
eligible to transfer up to $5,000 of the tuition amount to a parent, to a
grandparent, or to the parent or grandparent of the student’s spouse or
225
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Carryforward amounts from a previous year are not eligible for transfer.
Medical expenses
Lines 330 and 331
The taxpayer
226
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Patrick paid the following medical expenses that he has not yet claimed:
November last year, $1,200 for orthodontic work for his daughter
Jan this year, $1,200 for additional orthodontic work for his daughter
May this year, $500 for new eyeglasses for his son
December this year, $750 for elective surgery for his partner
To maximize the value of Patrick’s medical expense claim, he should claim medical
expenses incurred during the 12-month period ending in November this year. This will
pick up the $1,200 paid in November last year, plus $1,200 and $500 paid this year
before the end of November, for total medical expenses of $2,900. While the
threshold reduces this amount, Patrick still ends up with a medical expense claim.
The remaining $750 of medical expenses incurred in December of this year can be
used when calculating Patrick’s (or his partner’s) next year’s medical expenses.
227
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Premiums paid for private health services plans (but not those paid by
an employer)
228
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Carol, whose taxable income is $230,371, donated $40,000 in 2019. Her donation tax
credit can be calculated as:
$6,600, derived as 33% x $20,000 (the amount of her taxable income of $230,371
in excess of the top bracket of $210,371)
The total amount is derived by adding together the result of each step: $300 + $6,600
+ $5,742 = $12,642.
229
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Year of death
In the year of death, the 75% limit increases to 100% of the taxpayer’s
net income.
On the tax return for the year prior to death, up to 100% of net income
On the estate’s tax return for the year the gift was completed, up to
75% of net income
On any of the five subsequent tax returns for the estate, up to 75% of
reported net income
Special exceptions
Cultural and ecological gifts are an exception to the rules described above.
In the case of a cultural or ecological gift, the 75% limit increases to 100%
of the taxpayer’s net income during the taxpayer’s lifetime.
230
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE 1
Bonnie inherited a substantial estate and decided to donate $50,000 to her church,
which is a registered charity. Bonnie’s 2019 net income was $45,000.
For 2019, the maximum amount Bonnie can claim for charitable donations is $33,750
(75% x $45,000).
The actual donation tax credit Bonnie will receive is $9,760 ($200 x 15% + ($33,750 –
$200) x 29%). The first $200 of donations is multiplied by 15%, and amounts above
$200 are multiplied by 29% to derive the donation credit. Bonnie can carry forward
any donation tax credit she does not use in 2019 and claim it on her tax return in any
of the subsequent five years.
EXAMPLE 2
In 2019, Nelly donated $25,000 to the local hospital, a registered charity. That same
year, Nelly’s net income was $24,000.
If Nelly dies in 2019 after making this donation, how much of the $25,000 donation
can her executor claim for charitable donations?
The executor can claim $24,000 (100% of her net income) for 2019, and can
potentially carry back the remaining $1,000 ($25,000 – $24,000) to Nelly’s 2018
return. The carryback is always dependant on sufficient net income and available
donation room.
Given that the first $200 of donations uses a 15% tax credit, it is
advantageous for a couple to combine their donations so $200 attracts the
231
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
15% rate only once, rather than $200 for each spouse. It is generally
advantageous for the higher-income spouse to claim the charitable tax
credit if that spouse’s taxable income is subject to the top tax bracket or if
the province of residence has surtaxes to which the higher-income spouse
is subject.
Gifts in kind
Charitable gifts can be completed as non-cash charitable donations (e.g.,
donating a piece of art), which are referred to as gifts in kind. Gifts of
capital property or depreciable property result in a disposition of the
property at fair market value, and create a taxable event for the taxpayer,
with the exception of gifts of ecologically sensitive land or publicly listed
securities. The tax consequences arising from any accrued capital gain and
potential recapture for depreciable property at the time of disposition
should be considered when evaluating a gift in kind. The fair market value
of the property becomes the taxpayer’s proceeds of disposition and
corresponding donation amount.
232
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
On line 120 of the tax return, the taxpayer enters taxable dividend income,
which is in fact the actual dividend received grossed up by 15% (2019
amount) for non-eligible dividends and 38% (2019 amount) for eligible
dividends. The dividend tax credit is available to individual taxpayers who
receive dividends from taxable Canadian corporations. The dividend-paying
corporations report information related to this tax credit to taxpayers on a
T3 and/or T5 slip.
A taxpayer must use personal tax credits before using the dividend tax
credit. This restricts the taxpayer’s ability to transfer allowable credits to a
spouse. If a taxpayer cannot use a dividend tax credit, and a spousal
transfer is not available, the taxpayer should review any options available
to prevent the dividend tax credit from expiring unused. For example,
charitable donations have a five-year carryforward available, which means
a current year donation credit could be delayed to a future year. Another
233
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
option that can increase income in order to take full use of the dividend tax
credit is to avoid using discretionary deductions such as capital cost
allowance and/or reserves that can be used in future periods.
The second element of the formula is designed to cap the foreign tax credit
at an amount not higher than the rate of tax that would have been levied
in Canada.
However, here are two tax credits that can generate a refund to the
taxpayer:
234
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The federal government administers these two refundable tax credits and
usually pays them directly to the recipient on a quarterly basis; they do
not appear on the personal tax return.
Be over age 18
235
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
236
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
All income
All income from all sources is entered on the appropriate lines and the
total is entered on line 150.
Total deductions
All deductions are entered on the appropriate line and totalled on line 233.
Net income
Additional deductions
Taxable income
237
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The dividend tax credit is added to the tax credits from line 350 and
the total is entered on line 49 of Schedule 1.
Surtaxes
A surtax is a tax calculated based on taxes already owing, so is typically an
additional layer of tax on top of the basic tax structure. A government
body, federal or provincial, may use surtaxes as a means to collect an
additional layer of tax from those already paying tax based on the basic
tax structure. Surtaxes are commonly directed at a particular segment of
the higher income-earning population.
Ontario levies a surtax of 20% on Ontario taxes greater than $4,740 and
an additional 36% on Ontario taxes greater than $6,067. Through the use
of a surtax, Ontario is targeting the higher income-earning population in
238
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
their province, pushing up the marginal tax rate of higher income earners
through an additional tax that applies only to those who reach a certain
tax threshold.
239
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Refund of contributions
An AIP is subject to regular tax and also attracts an extra 20% of tax
(12% in Quebec). The regular tax comes from the AIP as a normal income
inclusion amount; however, taxpayers who receive an AIP must fill out
Form T1172, “Additional Tax on Accumulated Income Payments,” to
calculate the additional tax amount (line 418).
Tax brackets
Each province sets its own tax rates using its own tax brackets.
Table 13, published by the Canada Revenue Agency, shows the provincial
and territorial tax rates.
240
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
242
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Conclusion
This section reviewed the calculation of net income, taxable income and
taxes payable for an individual. Using the tax return as a guide, it looked
at various types of income and benefits individuals, employees and self-
employed persons receive. The section also explored tax deductions, tax
credits and tax-free benefits available to individuals and families.
Although the tax statutes in Canada are complex, most Canadians operate
their financial affairs in a straightforward fashion, and a financial planner
with a basic understanding of income tax should be able to recognize
straightforward issues and identify relevant applications with ease and
confidence.
243
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The Income Tax Act does not specifically define what constitutes a capital
gain. That said, recall that an apple tree is often used as a metaphor to
illustrate the difference between capital and income. If you are an apple
producer, the apples the tree produces are income. However, if you sell
the tree itself, that is a capital transaction.
244
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Was it to be developed?
Another consideration in the distinction is how often the taxpayer buys and
sells similar property; the higher the frequency, the greater the likelihood
it is a business and therefore ordinary income rather than a capital gain.
In general terms, the capital gains system provides tax advantages because:
245
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The Income Tax Act classifies three types of capital property, each of
which is subject to different types of tax treatment:
Personal-use property
Other property
Personal-use property
Personal-use property is defined as property that is used primarily for
personal use or enjoyment by the taxpayer or by a person related to the
taxpayer. It includes items such as automobiles, boats, recreational
equipment, a cottage, a principal residence and other similar items.
Personal-use property is used for personal consumption rather than for
generating income.
246
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Jewellery
A stamp
A coin
Other property
The third category is other property, which includes capital property that
does not fall within the definition of personal-use property or listed
personal property and is acquired for the purpose of earning income.
Examples of items included in this category are capital investments (i.e.,
stocks, bonds and marketable securities) and business assets such as
rental property and equipment. Note that business inventory is not capital
property.
247
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Basic formulas
The formula for deriving the amount of a capital gain or loss on the
disposition of an asset is:
The portion of a capital loss that is deductible against a taxable capital gain
is referred to as an allowable capital loss. An allowable capital loss is
derived by multiplying the capital loss by the current inclusion rate (50%):
EXAMPLE
Anna sold her shares of TYT Inc. for $25,000. Her adjusted cost base on the shares
was $15,000, and she paid a sales commission of 2% on the $25,000 of proceeds.
249
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Capital loss
A capital loss generally occurs when the capital gain calculation above
generates a negative result (row E is negative) — that is, when the sum of
the adjusted cost base and expenses of disposition is greater than the
proceeds of disposition.
EXAMPLE
Roberta sold her shares of Redo Inc. for $20,000. The ACB on Roberta’s Redo Inc
shares was $22,000, and she paid a sales commission of 2% on the $20,000 of
proceeds.
Non-capital loss
A non-capital loss is a loss other than a capital loss. A non-capital loss
would arise when a business’s expenses exceed revenue.
250
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Disposition
The Income Tax Act defines the term disposition for tax purposes as the
transfer of the ownership of property and may be voluntary or involuntary.
A voluntary disposition includes the sale, gift or transfer of capital property
from a taxpayer to an individual, a trust or a corporation. An involuntary
disposition includes the destruction, theft, foreclosure or expropriation of
the property.
While a capital asset may increase or decrease in value over time, this
change in value has income tax implications only when the gain or loss is
realized through an actual disposition or deemed disposition for income tax
purposes.
251
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Involuntary disposition
Property stolen or destroyed often qualifies for compensation through
insurance. If the taxpayer receives compensation, that compensation is
deemed to be the proceeds of disposition in the calculation of the
taxpayer’s capital gain or loss.
It is possible to avoid this general rule if the taxpayer uses the proceeds to
repair or replace the damaged property within a reasonable period of time.
Proceeds of disposition
The term proceeds of disposition is a defined term in the Income Tax Act
and includes the sale price of the property that has been disposed of, as
well as the compensation the taxpayer receives for property that is
expropriated, stolen or lost. Proceeds of disposition are the gross amount
before selling expenses. When the payment of insurance occurs on
property that has been damaged, the insurance proceeds are considered
the proceeds of disposition unless the proceeds are used to repair the
damage within a reasonable period of time.
252
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Inadequate consideration
When transfers of capital property occur between non-arm’s-length
parties, the parties are deemed to transact at fair market value no matter
what other value may be chosen by the parties involved. This rule
prevents the artificial avoidance of tax.
EXAMPLE 1
Anita’s stock portfolio has a fair market value of $10,000. She sells the portfolio to her
brother, David, for $2,500, which is her adjusted cost base. Her intention was to avoid
tax on the capital gain and to benefit David who is in a lower tax bracket.
The Income Tax Act deems Anita to have received fair market value on the transfer of
her portfolio.
253
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Anita (Sister):
Deemed proceeds of disposition $10,000
Less:
Adjusted cost base $2,500
Selling costs 0
Subtotal $2,500
Capital gain $7,500
Taxable capital gain (50% of capital gain) $3,750
If David were to sell his stock portfolio the next day at its fair market value of $10,000,
he will trigger a $7,500 capital gain ($10,000 – $2,500).
EXAMPLE 2
Anita’s stock portfolio has a fair market value of $10,000 and an adjusted cost base of
$2,500. This time, Anita sells the portfolio to her brother, David, for $12,500.
The Income Tax Act deems Anita to have received $12,500 as the proceeds of
disposition for her stock portfolio.
Anita (Sister):
Proceeds of disposition $12,500
Less:
Adjusted cost base $2,500
Selling costs 0
Subtotal $2,500
Capital gain $10,000
Taxable capital gain (50% of capital gain) $5,000
254
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
David (Brother):
In this case, David’s adjusted cost base on the portfolio is $10,000, the fair market
value of the portfolio.
255
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
256
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE 1
In January of this year, Ming disposed of capital property that was subject to capital
gains tax. His proceeds of disposition were $20,000, while the adjusted cost base on
the property was $10,000. He incurred no expenses in the acquisition or sale of the
property.
Proceeds of disposition $20,000
Less:
Adjusted cost base $10,000
Selling costs 0
Subtotal $10,000
Capital gain $10,000
Taxable capital gain (50% of capital gain) $5,000
EXAMPLE 2
Grant owns 1,000 shares of TopNotch Inc., a publicly traded company, which he
acquired three years ago. The adjusted cost base of the shares is $10 per share,
while the shares are currently valued at $18 each. Grant is interested in making a
significant charitable donation by transferring these shares to a charitable
organization.
Proceeds of disposition $18,000
Less:
Adjusted cost base $10,000
Selling expenses 0
Subtotal $10,000
Capital gain $8,000
Taxable capital gain (0% of capital gain) 0
257
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Allowable capital losses become net capital losses if they are not used in
the year incurred. Net capital losses are the excess of capital losses over
capital gains. Net capital losses may be carried back three years or carried
forward indefinitely to be claimed against taxable capital gains.
EXAMPLE 1
During the current year, John realized a capital gain of $15,000 on the sale of JKL
shares and a capital loss of $8,000 on the sale of XYZ shares. The net capital gain on
the sale of these two groups of shares is $7,000 ($15,000 - $8,000).
The capital gain inclusion rate is applied against the net capital gain of $7,000.
If only the XYZ shares were sold with no other capital transactions, the results would
change. This would create a capital loss of $8,000 and an allowable capital loss of
$4,000 (50% of $8,000).
However, an allowable capital loss can only be offset against a taxable capital gain (it
cannot normally be used to offset other sources of income). Because, in this case,
John cannot use the $4,000 allowable capital loss in the current year, it becomes a
net capital loss. John can carry the net capital loss back up to three years to apply
against taxable capital gains in that period. Alternatively, the net capital loss of $4,000
258
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
can be carried forward indefinitely. The net capital loss will be available to John to
apply as an offset against taxable capital gains in the future.
Assume that John carries the $4,000 net capital loss forward. Next year, he sells the
JKL shares and realizes proceeds of disposition of $15,000. The adjusted cost base
on the JKL shares is $7,000, while selling expenses total $1,000. John incurs a
taxable capital gain of $3,500 (50% x ($15,000 – ($7,000 + $1,000))) from the sale of
JKL shares. He can now use the $4,000 net capital loss from the prior year to reduce
the $3,500 taxable capital gain to zero. This leaves $500 of net capital losses that
John can continue to carry forward.
EXAMPLE 2
An allowable capital loss can be used to reduce a taxable capital gain to zero, but the
system does not allow an individual to claim an allowable capital loss against other
income.
While Lee incurred a capital gain of $7,000 on the KLM asset, the gain is offset by the
capital losses on the other two assets (EFG and HIJ).
The net loss of $6,000 equals a $3,000 allowable capital loss (50% of $6,000). If Lee
cannot use the allowable capital loss this year, it becomes a net capital loss that he
can carry back to the previous three-year period or carry forward indefinitely.
259
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Superficial loss
The term superficial loss applies when a taxpayer incurs a loss on the
disposition of capital property and an identical property is acquired or
reacquired by the taxpayer or an affiliated person within the period of 30
days before and 30 days after a disposition.
Himself or herself
In this way, the taxpayer does not realize an immediate benefit from
selling and reacquiring property that results in a superficial loss.
The superficial loss rule does not apply to deemed dispositions that occur
due to:
Death
Expiry of an option
Emigration
260
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Maria sells her XYZ shares for $50,000 when her adjusted cost base is $75,000.
Maria’s common-law partner, Shartha, buys $50,000 worth of XYZ shares within 30
days of Maria’s disposition.
Proceeds of disposition $50,000
Less:
Adjusted cost base $75,000
Selling expenses – 2% of proceeds $1,000
Subtotal $76,000
Capital loss ($26,000)
Maria cannot claim the capital loss at the time she disposes of the XYZ shares
because of the superficial loss rules. However, the $26,000 capital loss is added to
the adjusted cost base of Shartha’s XYZ shares. Shartha’s adjusted cost base is
$76,000 (her purchase price of $50,000 plus the $26,000 superficial loss Maria
experienced).
262
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
In general, the rules for a capital gains reserve provide that at least one-
fifth of a taxpayer’s taxable capital gain must be reported in the year of
sale and each of the four following years, to a maximum of five years. If a
taxpayer transfers certain farm property or shares in a small business
corporation, he or she can claim a capital gains reserve over a maximum
of 10 years.
Claiming a capital gains reserve is optional, and a taxpayer can claim any
amount up to the maximum allowed. To make a claim, a taxpayer must file
Form T2017, “Summary of Reserves on Dispositions of Capital Property,”
with his or her tax return in the year of sale. Capital gains reserves deducted
from income in one year must be added to income in the subsequent year.
EXAMPLE
Assume that a taxpayer sells a capital property for $5,000,000 with a nominal
adjusted cost base. The taxpayer receives $1,000,000 immediately when the
transaction closes, and the buyer will pay the remaining $4,000,000 over the next four
years. The taxpayer is permitted to claim a capital gains reserve calculated as follows:
Proceeds of disposition $5,000,000
Less:
Adjusted cost base Nominal
Selling expenses Nominal
Subtotal Nominal
Capital gain $5,000,000
Reserve $4,000,000
Lesser of:
1. (Outstanding proceeds ÷ total proceeds) x capital gain
[$4,000,000]
2. 1/5 of capital gain x 4
263
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
[$4,000,000]
In this case (1) and (2) are each $4,000,000
Declared capital gain $1,000,000
Declared taxable capital gain $500,000
Personal-use property
Only capital gains are considered, for tax purposes, when a taxpayer
disposes of personal-use property; capital losses incurred on the
disposition of personal-use property are not considered for tax purposes.
In other words, capital gains are taxable, while capital losses are not
deductible on dispositions of personal-use property. The rationale for this
difference is built on the premise that the government considers any losses
in these cases to be personal consumption rather than a real economic
loss.
In addition, the Income Tax Act deems that for personal-use property, the
proceeds of disposition and the adjusted cost base are both set at a
minimum of $1,000. This is known as the de minimus rule and it applies as
follows:
264
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Keith recently sold his guitar, piano and sailboat. The table shows the original
purchase price and sale proceeds:
Calculation of the taxable capital gain for Keith’s disposition of personal-use property is:
Notes:
The adjusted cost base for the guitar and sailboat are deemed to be $1,000.
The sale of the piano resulted in a capital loss that is not deductible, so calculation of
the allowable capital loss is not required.
265
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Jim’s stamp collection had an adjusted cost base of $7,500. In June of this year, with
the help of a stamp dealer, Jim sold the collection for $12,000. He paid the dealer an
8% commission on the sale. In September of this year, Jim sold a rare book for
$9,000, although his adjusted cost base on the book was $12,300. The table outlines
the tax outcome arising on the sale of Jim’s stamp collection and rare book:
266
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Replacement property
In the following situations, it may be possible to postpone or defer the
recognition of a capital gain or recapture of capital cost allowance on the
disposition of property:
The taxpayer must recognize the capital gain and/or recapture of capital
cost allowance in the year of disposition and can defer the gain/recapture
if the taxpayer replaces the property within the same tax year. If
replacement takes longer than the current tax year, the taxpayer must pay
the associated income tax in the current year and may refile when the
replacement property is acquired.
For involuntary dispositions, the taxpayer must replace the property by the
later of 24 months after the taxation year in which the disposition
occurred, or by the end of the second taxation year following the taxation
year in which the disposition occurred.
267
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
For voluntary dispositions, the taxpayer must replace the former business
property by the later of 12 months after the taxation year in which the
disposition occurred, or by the end of the first taxation year following the
taxation year in which the disposition occurred.
EXAMPLE
A business is in need of expanded warehouse space, so it sells the current
warehouse and buys a new warehouse. As the table shows, the sale (or disposition)
of the warehouse must be separated into the land and building components:
Land Building
ACB FMV ACB UCC FMV
Old $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $900,000 $2,000,000
warehouse
New $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,900,000 $3,000,000
warehouse
The sale of the old warehouse resulted in a capital gain of $1,000,000 ($2,000,000
FMV - $1,000,000 ACB) on the land and $1,000,000 ($2,000,000 FMV - $1,000,000
ACB) on the building. In addition, the building is depreciable property, so a calculation
of potential recapture is required. The recapture on the disposition of the old
warehouse is $100,000, derived as the UCC balance reduced by (the lesser of
proceeds of disposition and capital cost of the building).
[$900,000 – $1,000,000, where the $1,000,000 is calculated as the lesser of
$2,000,000 and $1,000,000].
The replacement property rules allow the taxpayer to defer the capital gain and
recapture arising on the disposition because a similar property was purchased. The
result in this case is that the adjusted cost base of the new land and building is
reduced by the gain arising on the disposition of the old land and building.
In this example, the adjusted cost base of the new land and building should be
$3,000,000 and $3,000,000, respectively, without the replacement property rules.
However, because the replacement property rules allow the taxpayer to defer the
268
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
gain, the adjusted cost base of the new land and building is $2,000,000 and
$2,000,000 respectively.
The new undepreciated capital cost on the building without the replacement property
rules would be $3,000,000. However, with the replacement property rules, the new
undepreciated capital cost is $1,900,000. The new undepreciated capital cost under
the deferred rules is derived as the new cost of the building ($3,000,000) less the
deferred gain arising on the disposition of the old building ($1,000,000) less the
deferred recapture of $100,000 on the disposition of the old building.
The deferred gain and recapture because of the replacement property rules is
reflected in a lower adjusted cost base and undepreciated capital cost of the
replacement property. The taxpayer has deferred a $2,000,000 capital gain on the
disposition of the old land and building and $100,000 recaptured capital cost
allowance on the disposition of the old building.
Summary
Table 14 shows how the terminology fits together.
Capital gain Proceeds less adjusted cost base and selling expenses
(if a positive result)
Capital loss Proceeds less adjusted cost base and selling expenses
(if a negative result)
Net capital loss An allowable capital loss that is not used in the year
incurred is added to the taxpayer’s pool of net capital
losses. It can be carried back three years or carried
forward indefinitely. It can be claimed only against
taxable capital gains, except in the year of death when
it can be claimed against any type of income.
269
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The election to opt out of the automatic rollover and to have the
transaction occur on a fair market value basis must be filed with the
transferor’s income tax return for the year in which the transfer occurs.
270
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Special exemption
A taxpayer’s personal residence is considered personal-use property and,
while gains on personal-use property are taxable, the Income Tax Act
provides an exemption from taxation for the taxpayer’s principal residence.
Ordinarily inhabited
While the Income Tax Act does not define ordinarily inhabited, it uses the
term in conjunction with the phrase in the year, not throughout the year.
As such, this allows for the periodic use of a cottage or vacation property.
For example, if a taxpayer owns both a home and a cottage and inhabits
both on a periodic basis, even if the cottage is only used during a small
portion of the year, it would be reasonable to consider the taxpayer as
meeting the criteria of ordinarily inhabited. Alternatively, a piece of land
purchased for the intention of future development would not qualify under
the definition of a principal residence because it is not ordinarily inhabited.
The property for which the principal residence exemption is being claimed
does not need to be located in Canada, provided that all of the qualifying
conditions apply.
While a taxpayer may claim only one principal residence for any taxation
year, he or she has discretion to select which property to claim (provided
the property meets the principal residence criteria) for each year of
ownership. For example, if a taxpayer owns both a home and a cottage
simultaneously, the taxpayer may claim only one of them in each year of
ownership; however, he or she can choose which to claim for any
particular year. It is generally advantageous to claim the exemption on the
property with the greater capital appreciation, when possible.
272
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Where,
“A” is the number of years the property is designated as the principal residence and
the owner was resident in Canada. This would be whole years; for example, 1979 to
2010 would be 32 years of ownership regardless of when in the year the home was
bought or sold.
This “1+” element also means that if a taxpayer owns a home and a
cottage at the same time and wants to claim 100% of the principal
residence exemption on a single property, he or she can designate one
property as a principal residence for one year less than the time it was
actually owned to derive a full exemption. This leaves one year not yet
designated, which the taxpayer can subsequently designate toward the
second property as a principal residence.
273
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Change in use
When there is a complete change in use of a property (100% change), the
owner is deemed to have immediately sold the property and immediately
reacquired the property. This means the accrued capital gain is triggered
when the property ceases to be a principal residence and is changed to a
rental property, or when a rental property is changed to become a
principal residence.
While this election remains valid, the property could continue to qualify as
the individual’s principal residence for up to four years even though the
property is not ordinarily inhabited by the taxpayer or other qualifying
individuals, provided the taxpayer is a resident of Canada and no other
property is designated for a similar claim. This election provides the
taxpayer with an opportunity to defer the associated income tax liability
until the property is eventually disposed of.
EXAMPLE
Pat and Chris bought their home for $300,000 in 1988.
They moved out in 2012 when the home was worth $500,000 and began to rent it to a
tenant. This change would be classified as a complete change in use of the property.
274
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
They elected to defer recognition of the deemed gain by filing a letter with the Canada
Revenue Agency and chose to not claim CCA on the rental property. Pat and Chris
remained resident in Canada.
Pat and Chris sold the rental property in 2019 for $750,000, which requires them to
recognize a capital gain of $450,000 ($750,000 proceeds less $300,000 cost).
Over the couple’s 32 years of ownership, they can claim 25 years as a principal
residence (1988 to 2012), plus they can elect to treat four years of the rental property
period as a principal residence.
The formula for determining the principal residence exemption is (1 + 29) ÷ 32, which
results in 93.75% of the $450,000 capital gain being exempt ($421,875).
The outcome for Pat and Chris is a tax liability on the remaining $28,125 of capital
gain realized in 2019.
During the period when Pat and Chris did not reside in the home, they were living in a
rental property so did not claim any principal residence exemption in respect of any
other property.
275
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
For example, renting out one or two existing bedrooms generally fits within
the Canada Revenue Agency’s administrative practice as being ancillary in
nature. However, building a new self-contained rental unit in the basement
would generally not be considered as ancillary.
Larger properties
The definition of a principal residence limits the amount of land associated
with the home to one-half hectare. A hectare is a metric unit of 10,000
square metres, or about 2.47 acres.
The taxpayer may be able to claim more land as part of his or her principal
residence but would have to prove the excess land was necessary for the
use and enjoyment of the property as a principal residence. For example, a
municipality may have a minimum lot size in excess of one-half hectare.
Farmers
It is common to find a family home located on the family farm property. In
these cases, when the farm (including the family home) is sold, it is
possible to shelter some of the resulting gain from tax by claiming the
principal residence exemption.
276
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The individual can make a reasonable allocation of the sale proceeds and
determine a fair amount to be allocated between the family home and
surrounding land. In this situation, a capital gain is determined for each of
the home and surrounding land. The principal residence exemption is
applied as a reduction to the gain in respect of the principal residence
portion.
Value of exemption
The principal residence exemption is a valuable benefit that many
Canadians enjoy. However, the Canada Revenue Agency has been paying
increased attention to the administration and taxpayer compliance
associated with this generous tax provision.
277
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
keep in mind that an actual or deemed disposition may be far into the
future and requires that assumptions be made. The financial planner
should fully vet all assumptions with the client and clearly document them
so individuals understand that changes in circumstances can affect the
anticipated tax consequences.
EXAMPLE
Dennis purchased his home in 2010 and his cottage in 2015. In 2019, he sold both
the home and the cottage. The home has a capital gain of $100,000, and the cottage
has a capital gain of $40,000. Due to the home’s significant appreciation, it is
advantageous for Dennis to claim the principal residence exemption on the home.
However, because of the “1+” element in the formula, Dennis only needs to designate
the home as his principal residence for nine years to derive a full exemption. This
leaves one year that he can apply to the cottage.
278
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
By designating his home as a principal residence for only nine years, Dennis acquires
a full exemption on the capital gain for his home. In addition, he derives a $16,000
capital gains exemption on the cottage that he would not have had if he had
designated the full 10 years on his home.
279
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Introduction
Financial planners who are familiar with the practice of accounting may be
aware of the variety of methods by which depreciation may be applied
across different assets and different companies from an
accounting/bookkeeping perspective.
The Income Tax Act defines depreciable property as property the taxpayer
owns that is entitled to the deduction of capital cost allowance. The
disposition of depreciable capital property may cause a recapture of capital
cost allowance, which means amounts previously deducted must be taken
back into income, if the property is sold for more than its depreciated
value. In addition, a disposition of depreciable property could result in a
280
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
capital gain if the property is sold for more than the property’s adjusted
cost base.
Prescribed
Class Description
Rate (%)
281
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
282
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
CCA = undepreciated capital cost (of the class) x prescribed rate (for the class)
Each asset class in which a taxpayer has assets carries its own
undepreciated capital cost balance. The balance is generally updated each
year by beginning with the previous year’s ending balance.
283
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
First-year rule
In the year an asset is purchased, the taxpayer may only claim capital cost
allowance on 50% of the net additions to the particular class. This rule is
commonly known as the first-year rule or half-year rule. There are a few
exceptions, such as small tools in class 12, where the half-year rule does
not apply.
The calculation of net additions is the sum of the capital cost of all new
additions into the class less the proceeds of disposition from that same
class.
EXAMPLE
During the 2019 fiscal year, Anthony purchased a piece of new equipment with a
capital cost of $15,000 and disposed of $7,000 in equipment (the $7,000 is the lesser
of capital cost and the proceeds of disposition). The balance in his class 8 capital cost
allowance account at the beginning of 2019 was $80,000.
284
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The calculation only considers the fact that the taxpayer purchased the
property within a taxation year; it does not matter at what point in the
year the property was purchased.
General principles
Purpose
Simply owning an asset that falls within one of the capital cost allowance
classes does not make the property a depreciable asset. To be depreciable,
the taxpayer must purchase the asset for the purpose of gaining or
producing income.
285
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Change in purpose
When a taxpayer acquires capital property for a purpose other than
generating business income and later commences to utilize the asset to
generate business income, the property becomes eligible for capital cost
allowance.
Passenger vehicles
The Income Tax Act limits the maximum capital cost for passenger
vehicles to $30,000 plus applicable GST, HST and PST, subject to an
annual maximum capital cost allowance of 30%. This group of vehicles is
categorized into class 10.
Passenger vehicles where the actual cost exceeds the prescribed maximum
of $30,000 are added to a separate class 10.1 and also subject to a
maximum annual capital cost allowance of 30% (based on the threshold
maximum of $30,000 plus GST, HST and PST, not the actual cost).
286
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Availability of asset
To be eligible for capital cost allowance, assets must be available for use
during the taxation year.
The outcome of the disposition will result in one of the following scenarios:
Within each class is a pool of assets that meet the criteria for inclusion in
the CCA class. After the disposition of one asset, there may still be assets
remaining in the class and a positive undepreciated capital cost balance. In
this case, capital cost allowance continues to be calculated on the
remaining undepreciated capital cost balance.
After a taxpayer disposes of the last asset within a class, leaving no assets
in that class but a positive undepreciated capital cost balance, the
remaining undepreciated capital cost balance may be deducted as a
287
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
When the lesser of capital cost and the proceeds of disposition exceed the
undepreciated capital cost balance in the class (i.e., the undepreciated
capital cost balance becomes negative), a recapture of capital cost
allowance occurs. A recapture of capital cost allowance describes the
situation when the taxpayer must include in income an amount of capital
cost allowance previously claimed as a deduction.
The recapture of capital cost allowance is treated as income in the year the
disposition occurs, with no opportunity for deferral. This means the
amount of the recapture is fully taxable as income — so a recapture
amount of $10,000 means the full $10,000 (not just a portion of it) is
taxable income.
288
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Samantha, a financial planner, is working with a client who owns a small business.
While discussing the tax consequences of disposing of depreciable capital property,
Samantha creates a table to demonstrate the tax results associated with four different
disposition scenarios. Each column reflects a different set of circumstances.
A — Proceeds of disposition are greater than the capital cost and assets remain in
the class after the disposition.
B — Proceeds of disposition are less than the capital cost, creating a negative
balance in the undepreciated capital cost account, and assets remain in the class
after the disposition.
C — After disposition, the undepreciated capital cost account balance is positive, and
no assets remain in the class.
D (the most common) — After disposition, the undepreciated capital cost account
balance is positive, and assets remain in the class.
A B C D
Facts
Results
289
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Scenario A — The taxpayer realizes a capital gain of $4,000, which translates into a
$2,000 taxable capital gain. In addition, the taxpayer has a remaining undepreciated
capital cost balance of $2,000 against which she can continue to claim a capital cost
allowance deduction.
Scenario C — No assets remain in the class, which means the taxpayer can claim a
terminal loss of $2,000. The $2,000 terminal loss is fully deductible against other
business income.
290
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Attribution
Introduction
The Income Tax Act includes an extensive set of attribution rules that
apply to property individuals transfer or lend to their spouse or common-
law partner or to an individual under age 18 who is non-arm’s length or a
niece or nephew of the transferor. The intention of these rules is to
prevent a taxpayer from splitting income among a pre-defined group of
family members and thereby reduce the amount of tax payable.
Designated person
The term designated person is used for purposes of the attribution rules. A
designated person in respect of an individual is either:
291
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Attribution rule
When an individual transfers or lends property, either directly or indirectly,
to his or her spouse or common-law partner (or to a person who has since
become the individual’s spouse or common-law partner):
Any taxable capital gain or allowable capital loss resulting from the
disposition of the property is attributed to the transferring individual
These rules apply not only to the property transferred but to substituted
property. If, for example, the transferred property is sold and replaced
with another property, the attribution rules continue to apply to the
substituted property. This could occur, for example, when the original
property is a set of common shares but, through one or a series of
transactions, the common shares are replaced with preferred shares or
another asset.
292
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
293
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
for that taxation year and all future income is attributed to the lending
spouse.
EXAMPLE
Bert gave $50,000 to his common-law partner, Ernie. Ernie used the funds to invest in
a portfolio that generated annual income of 3%.
The following table shows how, over time, the first-generation income remains the
same and the second-generation income slowly increases.
294
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Death of transferor
Income and capital attribution apply to transfers of property between
spouses or common-law partners while alive; this is referred to as an inter
vivos transfer. However, attribution stops for inter vivos transfers when
either spouse dies. In other words, attribution “ceases at the grave.”
295
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
If, for example, property is transferred from Spouse A to Spouse B and the
intention is to hold the non-income-producing property for the long term,
while the attribution rules apply they have no effect during any period
when the property generates no income. The capital gain attribution rules
apply when Spouse B disposes of the property, if Spouse A is still alive.
EXAMPLE 1
Hank owns shares of Bayhampton Inc. that have an adjusted cost base of $7,500.
If he decides to give the shares (transfer ownership) to his spouse, Shawna, as a gift
when the fair market value of the shares is $10,000, what tax consequences arise?
The shares transfer from Hank to Shawna on an automatic rollover basis, with all
immediate tax consequences deferred, because Hank and Shawna are spouses. The
facts indicate the shares were a gift, which means Shawna did not pay for the shares.
Once the shares transfer, Shawna is the new owner of the shares. Provided there are
no dividends paid on the shares and Shawna does not dispose of the shares, there
are no tax consequences for either Shawna or Hank.
If Bayhampton Inc. pays dividends that total $1,000 on the Bayhampton Inc. shares,
what are the tax consequences?
While the dividend is paid to Shawna, Hank bears the income tax consequences
because of the income attribution rules. Hank must pay income tax on the dividend
income. The dividend gross-up and dividend tax credit scheme will apply to the cash
amount of the dividend payment, just as if Hank had retained ownership of the shares
and received the dividend directly. There are no tax consequences for Shawna.
296
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
If Shawna sells the Bayhampton Inc. shares for $16,000, what are the tax
consequences?
Proceeds of disposition $16,000
Less: ACB $7,500
Equals: capital gain $8,500
Taxable capital gain (50% of capital gain) $4,250
Tax consequences for Shawna None
Tax consequences for Hank (taxable capital gain) $4,250
The taxable capital gain of $4,250 on the Bayhampton Inc. shares is attributed to
Hank because the shares were a gift to Shawna, so she did not pay fair market value
consideration. While there was no immediate tax consequence at the time of transfer,
the consequences arise if the receiving spouse — in this case, Shawna — disposes
of the shares while Hank is still alive.
EXAMPLE 2
On September 15, Haley loaned $50,000 to her spouse, Jonathan, so he could
purchase shares of EverMore Industries. The Evans drew up a formal agreement that
included a repayment schedule and an interest charge equal to the prescribed rate at
the time of the transfer. However, Jonathan never paid interest during the year nor did
he pay any interest by January 30 of the following year.
Since Jonathan did not pay interest by the January 30 deadline, the prescribed rate
loan exception does not apply. As such, all income Jonathan earns on the EverMore
Industries shares and any capital gain or loss he realizes on the disposition of the
shares while Haley is alive is attributed to Haley.
297
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Sam sells his portfolio of stocks to his common-law partner, Pat. Sam and Pat elect
out of the rollover provision, which means that Sam realizes the accrued capital gain
on his stock portfolio at the time of the sale to Pat.
298
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Pat must use his own financial resources to complete the purchase or accept a
prescribed rate loan from Sam with terms of repayment and a reasonable (or
prescribed) rate of interest. To avoid attribution, Pat must pay Sam interest on the
loan (according to the terms of the loan agreement) during the year or within 30 days
following year-end. Sam must include the interest payment in his income for the year
he receives it.
Separation
Income or loss from the property during the period of separation is not
attributed to the transferring individual
299
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Changes in circumstances
There are times when attribution applies, and then ceases to apply.
Common examples include:
Anti-avoidance rule
Deliberately using the attribution rules for tax planning is not permitted.
The Income Tax Act considers this type of use as an artificial transaction
and treats it as if it had not occurred. In addition, there is the overarching
general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) that has been applied successfully to
scenarios where the strategy was to purposely cause the attribution rules
to apply and shift income to the designated person to lower the family
unit’s overall income tax consequences.
EXAMPLE
George and Marie Easton, a married couple, look for every opportunity to minimize
income tax. Marie’s marginal tax rate is 38%, whereas George’s marginal tax rate is
22%.
The Eastons decided that George will guarantee a loan incurred by Marie to buy
investment certificates.
300
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Under the attribution rules, the investment income on the certificates is attributed to
George because he guaranteed Marie’s loan. However, transactions such as this are
designed to artificially attribute income to the lower-income designated person, which
means the rules are being applied to achieve the reverse of their intended purpose.
There is a specific anti-avoidance rule that prevents a taxpayer from using artificial
transactions to benefit from the attribution rules. If the circumstances do not fall within
the artificial transaction rule, the Canada Revenue Agency can rely on GAAR as an
overarching anti-avoidance rule. As such, the attribution rules will not apply in this
specific scenario, and the Eastons will not benefit from attributing income to the lower-
income spouse.
Attribution rule
Property that an individual transfers or lends, either directly or indirectly,
to a person under age 18 and who is non-arm’s length to the individual or
is a niece or nephew of the individual results in:
These rules apply when the individual is under age 18 for the entire year
(i.e., has not turned age 18 by December 31). Income attribution ceases
to apply in the year the minor turns age 18.
301
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
These rules apply not only to the property transferred but to substituted
property. If, for example, the transferred property is sold and replaced
with another property, the attribution rules continue to apply to the
substituted property. This could occur, for example, when the original
property is a set of common shares but, through one or a series of
transactions, the common shares are replaced with preferred shares or
another asset.
While a minor may not be in a position to own the property directly, this
type of transaction could occur using an inter vivos trust. In addition to
using the terms directly or indirectly to encompass any type of transfer,
the Income Tax Act specifically states that transfers using a trust are
subject to the attribution rules. The attribution rules are all-encompassing,
as the policy intent is to preclude income splitting with non-arm’s length
minors and nieces and nephews who are minors.
Nieces and nephews who are minors do not fall within the Income Tax
Act’s definition of non-arm’s length. They are, however, specifically
mentioned in the income attribution rules because the intent is to prevent
planning strategies that may involve adult siblings doing parallel transfers
to each other’s children.
302
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
and any resulting capital gain is taxable to the transferor at the time of
disposition. However, once the asset is in the hands of the minor, perhaps
owned by a trust with the minor as a beneficiary, appreciation on the
property is taxed in the hands of the minor (or the trust).
EXAMPLE
Ben settled $50,000 on an inter vivos trust set up for the benefit of his 12-year-old
son, Barny. The trustee invested the capital in a portfolio of investments that
generated annual income of 3%.
The table shows how, over time, the first-generation income stays the same, while the
second-generation income slowly increases. Second-generation income refers to
income earned on the income that has already been attributed to the transferor.
First-Generation Income Second- and
Subsequent-Generation
Income
Year 1 $1,500.00 Zero
Year 2 $1,500.00 $45.00
Year 3 $1,500.00 $136.35
Year 4 $1,500.00 $275.44
The first-generation income is attributed to Ben who is responsible for the income tax
consequences on the income. The second-generation income is included in Barny’s
income, and he is responsible for the income tax arising on it. This strategy could
provide a benefit to Ben and Barny when Barny’s marginal tax rate is lower than
Ben’s. While attribution causes the first-generation income to be taxed at Ben’s
marginal tax rate, this is no different than if Ben had not undertaken the transfer.
The benefit of income splitting arises as time passes, because Barny’s income
increases over time with the second-generation income. Tax on the second-
generation income is calculated at Barny’s lower marginal tax rate because there is
303
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
no attribution. While subtle, this is a permitted shift of income from Ben to Barny that
can lower the family unit’s overall tax liability and ultimately increase the family unit’s
disposable income.
As an aside, if the assets are disposed of by the trust resulting in a capital gain on the
disposition, the capital gain can be flowed out to Barny and taxed at his lower
marginal tax rate because capital gains are not subject to attribution.
In this case, the trust is used because a minor is involved and there are limitations
associated with minors executing contracts. As such, the trustees of a trust can
handle the transactions on behalf of the minor beneficiary.
The borrowing trust must make payments on the loan interest no later
than 30 days after the end of each taxation year as long as the loan is
outstanding
If interest is not paid by the trust in any year, or within the 30-day period
after December 31, all income earned for that taxation year and all future
income is attributed to the transferor.
The interest payment from the trust to the transferor must be included in
the transferor’s income.
Death of transferor
Income attribution applies to property transferred while the transferor is
alive, so it applies to inter vivos transfers. Attribution ceases, on prior
transfers to which it applied, when the transferor dies. There is no income
attribution on testamentary transfers.
EXAMPLE
Harvey’s three grandchildren - George, Benson, and Harry - are ages 12, 15, and 18,
respectively. As a special gift, Harvey gave each grandson a $5,000 term deposit that
earned annual interest of $225.
Interest earned in the first year for investments owned by George and Benson ($225 x
2) is attributed to Harvey because of the attribution rules. Interest earned on the
investment owned by Harry is not attributed to Harvey because Harry is 18 years old,
so attribution does not apply.
Avoiding attribution
Proof that one of the main purposes for the loan was not for tax avoidance
or tax reduction may include:
The explanation that the taxpayers are in the same tax bracket
The explanation that the loan was to buy personal-use property that
will not produce taxable income
306
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Gift exception
This attribution rule applies to loans and should not be confused with gifts.
Gifts to non-arm’s length persons who are not designated persons are not
subject to attribution. In other words, individuals can gift assets to their
adult children without the consequence of attribution. Keep in mind,
however, a parent who gives a capital asset to an adult child means the
parent will have a disposition of the capital asset at the time the gift is
made. The disposition has immediate tax consequences for the parent if
the fair market value is greater than the asset’s adjusted cost base. If the
parent has an inherent loss on the property, it is treated as a superficial
loss.
Tax liability
When a loan or transfer of property results in the application of the income
attribution rules, the transferor and transferee are jointly and severally
liable for the transferor’s tax liability because of attribution.
Dividend income
When dividends from a taxable Canadian corporation are attributed to a
taxpayer, the dividend gross-up and dividend tax credit rules apply. The
taxpayer to whom the dividend income is attributed must include the
grossed-up amount in his or her income but may also claim the dividend
tax credit.
307
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Samuel loaned $200,000 to his spouse, Joan, who used the money to establish a
bookstore. The money was used to pay the first and last month’s rent on the building,
purchase inventory and cover leasehold improvements.
The money Joan earns from the bookstore is business income, not property income,
so attribution does not apply to income Joan earns from the business.
308
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Samuel loaned an additional $100,000 to Joan, which she used to acquire an interest
in a limited partnership (she was not actively involved). Joan earned $15,000 in
income from the partnership.
In this case, because it is a limited partnership and Joan is a limited partner, the
$15,000 is considered property income and is attributed to Samuel.
Borrowed funds
If an individual repays the debt of a designated person who used the
original debt to acquire income-producing property, the income attribution
rules apply.
Loan guarantee
When a transaction requires a taxpayer to provide a guarantee for the
payment of interest or repayment of capital on a loan between a specified
person and a third party, the property loaned by the third-party is deemed
to have been lent by the taxpayer, resulting in income attribution. This
applies to absolute and contingent assignments. A specified person is
defined as an individual’s spouse or common-law partner or related minor.
309
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Income Splitting
Introduction
Income splitting strategies are designed to shift income from a family
member in a higher marginal tax bracket to another family member in a
lower marginal tax bracket, with the primary objective of paying less
income tax overall across the family unit. These types of strategies can
work when the individuals involved are in different marginal tax brackets
and provided the transfer of income between the individuals is acceptable
within the rules of the Income Tax Act. The concept of income splitting is
considered one of the most-effective ways to decrease taxes and maximize
cash flow within a family unit.
The Income Tax Act defines specific rules that permit or preclude certain
income splitting transactions when they occur between parties who are
non-arm’s length. As well, there are rules that preclude splitting income
with minors who are non-arm’s length, as well as minors who are nieces or
nephews. The new tax on split income rules are broad-based and do not
focus narrowly on related minors.
310
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Suitability
The suitability of any income splitting strategy should take into account
some or all of the following points:
The marginal tax rates of the individual giving up the income and the
individual receiving the income: The marginal tax rate may be a
consideration when the income splitting strategy begins, throughout
the period when income is being split, and when the income splitting
strategy is being wound-up. These time references can be important
considerations when measuring the net tax savings over the life of an
income splitting strategy.
311
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Notional transfer
Pension income splitting is unique because the pension income remains
with the recipient spouse. Income splitting occurs through a notional split
on the couple’s tax returns. The result is that the tax liability arising from
the split is the responsibility of the spouse who picks up the notional
allocation of pension income.
Pension income splitting has the potential to benefit all couples who
receive qualifying pension income. The challenge, however, often occurs
with second marriages or common-law relationships that occur in mid-life
and later-life. There are often agreements in place that designate the
312
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
The portion of each spouse’s pension that can be shared is based on the
number of months each spouse or common-law partner lived together
during their joint contributory period. The joint contributory period is the
time when either spouse could have contributed to CPP/QPP, while living
together. This is an important consideration and is one that is often
beneficial for those in long-term relationships, but less beneficial for
second marriages or relationships that occur in mid- to late-life.
Impact
When CPP/QPP pension sharing ends, the income of the couple is adjusted
to reflect their original CPP/QPP earnings. As such, the spouse whose
original CPP/QPP earnings were lower (and adjusted upward because of
sharing) will receive less pension income and therefore the associated
income tax liability will also decrease. The spouse whose original CPP/QPP
earnings were higher (and adjusted downward because of sharing), will
receive a higher pension income and have a corresponding increase in the
associated income tax liability.
CPP/QPP sharing tends to be more valuable for couples who are married or
in common-law relationships during their income-earning years, when
CPP/QPP applies. Couples in second marriages that occur in mid-life or
314
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
later-life will not benefit as much from this sharing opportunity as those
who were together during their income-earning years.
Spousal RRSP
A spousal Registered Retirement Savings Plan (spousal RRSP) permits a
couple to save taxes immediately and balance income across the family
unit over the longer term. The contributing spouse uses his or her
contribution room and benefits from the tax deduction when making a
contribution, but the RRSP belongs to the annuitant spouse.
While the pension income splitting rules appear to achieve a similar result,
a spousal RRSP creates far more certainty because the plan to income split
is put into action immediately when the contribution is made. Contributions
become the property of the RRSP annuitant (generally the spouse who is
anticipated to have the lower income during retirement). A spousal RRSP
remains a spousal RRSP forever.
The pension income splitting rules arise because of the generosity of the
government in power and, in many senses, they have a political
undertone. The rules are designed to benefit a specific segment of voting
taxpayers. The end of pension income splitting could occur at any time,
315
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Withdrawals
A withdrawal from a spousal RRSP is included as income to the annuitant
(non-contributing spouse), unless the timing of the withdrawal falls within
the RRSP spousal attribution rules.
Attribution rules
There are specific attribution rules associated with spousal RRSPs. Only the
annuitant (non-contributing spouse) may withdraw assets from a spousal
RRSP. However, those withdrawals are attributed to the contributing
spouse when contributions were made in the current or prior two taxation
years. In that case, the contributing spouse must include in his or her
income the lesser of:
The amount of any contribution made to any spousal RRSP during the
current or two immediately preceding years
316
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
EXAMPLE
Mary gave her spouse, Louise, $25,000 so she could top up her TFSA. The income
earned in Louise’s TFSA is not taxable, therefore there is no income to attribute to
Mary.
Mary now has less investment income to report, and Louise’s TFSA has more
investment earnings.
Assume Mary’s effective marginal tax rate is 40% on dividends and 25% on capital
gains, and that she could have earned a $750 dividend and a $500 capital gain on the
$25,000 she gifted to Louise.
If Mary has reduced her income by $750 of dividend income and $500 of capital gain,
the income tax savings is $425. This savings is derived as $750 of dividend income
taxed at a marginal rate of 40% plus $500 of capital gain taxed at a marginal rate of
25%.
317
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Potential value
A RESP provides the opportunity for parents and grandparents to split
income with their children and grandchildren. Contributing to a RESP
reduces the contributor’s capital base and, by extension, the contributor’s
investment income. The investment income earned inside the RESP is not
taxable while retained within the plan. Eventually, when withdrawals are
made from the plan, they are taxed to the child (or grandchild) and the
attribution rules do not apply to this income.
To measure the tax savings, consider the type of investment income the
contributing family member foregoes and multiply these amounts by his or
her effective marginal tax rates.
Suitability of strategy
The suitability of this income splitting strategy should take into account
some or all of the following points:
The effective marginal tax rates of the contributor at the time the
contribution is made, throughout the deferral period and when
withdrawals occur
318
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Contributions to the plan are not tax-deductible and can be made until the
end of the year in which the beneficiary turns age 59. Earnings and growth
accrue tax-deferred in the plan. The plan also offers families an
opportunity to supplement the plan with Canada Disability Savings Grants
and Canada Disability Savings Bonds for RDSP beneficiaries age 49 and
under.
319
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Potential value
By contributing to an RDSP, a parent or grandparent (or aunt, uncle, even
a close family member) reduces their capital base and, by extension, their
investment income. To measure the tax savings, consider the type of
investment income the contributing family member foregoes and multiply
these amounts by his or her effective marginal tax rate.
Suitability of strategy
To evaluate the suitability of this income splitting strategy, consider:
The effective marginal tax rate of the contributor at the time the
contribution is made, throughout the deferral period and when
withdrawals occur
The marginal tax rate of the RDSP beneficiary when withdrawals occur
320
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Spouse
Post- Mid-
or Individuals
Minor secondary years
Common- with
Children and
law Students Disabilities
Seniors
Partner
Prescribed X
X X X X
rate loan (via
trust)
RESP X X
RDSP X
Pension
income X
splitting
CPP/QPP
pension X
sharing
Spousal
X X
RRSP
Second-
generation X X X X
income
Capital gains X X
321
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Employment income
Employment income is exempt if that income is situated on the reserve.
The employment must be connected to the reserve to be exempt. This
means that an Indian living off the reserve but working for an employer
resident on the reserve would be exempt. Pro-rating is possible when
some of the duties are connected to the reserve.
Business income
A series of factors arising from common law principles are used to evaluate
the tax-exempt status of business income. The factors are used to
evaluate the connection of the income to the reserve. The most significant
factor is the location where the business carries on its revenue-generating
activities. When activities take place on the reserve, the location of
customers becomes an important consideration, along with a series of
other less important factors that include:
Whether the books and records of the business are kept on the reserve
Interest income
Interest income is exempt if that income arises from an on-reserve
investment. This has been interpreted to mean that the investment must
have been made on the reserve at a bank branch, investment office or
financial institution that is physically located on the reserve, and paid at
the on-reserve location. In addition, if it is a GIC or term deposit, the
323
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Capital gain
The gain on the disposition of capital property located on a reserve is tax-
exempt. If, however, the gain arises from the disposition of business
assets that were used to generate both exempt and non-exempt income,
pro-rating of the gain is acceptable.
All taxpayers are required to file an income tax return when there is a
disposition of capital property, regardless of whether the disposition is
taxable, exempt or a combination of both. To be clear, all dispositions
must be reported on an income tax return filed by the taxpayer.
Dividend income
An Indian who is a shareholder of a corporation that operates only on a
reserve can receive dividend income that is exempt from income tax. For a
corporation to qualify as being located on the reserve, the head office
management and principal income-generating activities of the corporation
must all be situated on the reserve.
324
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Royalty income
The taxation of royalty income depends on where the right is exploited or
can be enforced. If these rights are on-reserve, the related royalty income
is exempt from income tax; otherwise, the income is taxable.
RRSP
Recall that to create RRSP contribution room, a taxpayer must have
eligible earned income.
Indians who earn taxable income create RRSP contribution room and are
subject to the normal RRSP rules. However, when Indians earn only
exempt income, contributions to an RRSP cannot be deducted. In such a
case, withdrawals from original RRSP contributions are not taxable. Note,
however, because exempt income does not create RRSP contribution room,
an Indian will pay a penalty under Part X.1 of the Act, when making non-
deductible contributions to an RRSP.
325
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
Support payments
Support payments (spouse, common-law partner, child) received by an
Indian resident on the reserve are exempt from income tax. The Canada
Revenue Agency suggests that when these payments are received by an
Indian who does not reside on a reserve they may be taxable; however,
the worst case would be that the payments align with the regular income
tax rules.
Trust income
Trust income earned by a trust is taxable. An Indian beneficiary receiving
trust income is taxable on the income except when the trust income paid
to the Indian beneficiary can be shown to have a connection to the reserve
(i.e., it is earned on the reserve as discussed in relation to property and
business income).
Payroll deductions
Income tax deductions do not apply to income that is exempt under the
Indian Act. An Indian may request that the employer waive the deductions
at source for exempt payroll.
326
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Module 9: Taxation
While income earned and paid to an Indian may qualify as exempt income
for income tax purposes, the employer must still report the income on a T4
slip. Employees who qualify for tax-exempt earnings do not need to report
the income when filing their income tax return, except if there are
pensionable earnings when an employer has elected to cover exempt
employment income under the CPP.
GST/HST
An Indian purchasing goods or services on the reserve is exempt from the
goods and services tax (GST) or harmonized sales tax (HST). As well,
services performed off the reserve, but which relate to real property
interests located on a reserve, are exempt from GST/HST.
An Indian purchasing goods off of the reserve must pay GST/HST, except if
the good is delivered to the reserve by the vendor. The requirement that
the vendor must delivered the good may be waived for stores in remote
locations.
As well, Ontario has a process in place that provides for an exemption for
the provincial portion of HST when an Indian makes off-reserve purchases.
327
Copyright © 2020 The Financial Advisors Association of Canada
TAXATION
Financial Services professionals are expected to possess knowledge to allow them to
complete and interpret an individual’s basic personal tax return, including identifying and
explaining the income tax assessment rules for individuals, explaining the tax implications
of how different types of income received by individuals may be taxed, and identifying the
tax deductions and credits for which an individual may be eligible. They should further be
able to identify and estimate the benefit of engaging in foundational income splitting
strategies.
Taxation is one of twelve modules in the Advocis Core Curriculum Program for CFP®
and QAFP™ Certification.