Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CURRICULUM VITAE
Myocardial Infarction
In early stage of AMI , ECG may be
normal or near normal
Changes
< 1 mm - > 10 mm
• ST resolves - anterior up to 2
weeks; posterior > 2 weeks
• T wave : many months
Flattening of Horizontal
ST Segment ST Segment
Kumar A; Cannon CP et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(10):917-938; Steg G et al. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569-619;
Roffi M et al. European Heart Journal. 2016; 37: 267–315
STEMI Care
the Right Reperfusion
Strategy
2017
ABSOLUTE RELATIVE
1. Ibanez B et al. Eur Heart J 2017. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/4095042; Accessed November 6, 2017; 2. O’Gara PT et al. Circulation 2013;127:e362–e425; 3.
Morse MA et al. Drugs 009;69:1945–1966
20
3. Administered Drug
• IV line – 2 ways if hemodynamic is not stabil
• Disolve streptokinase with NaCL / RL 100 ml
• Infused for 30 – 60 minutes
22
NSTEACS Management :
The importance of Risk Stratification
Management strategy
1 CLINICAL CONDITION
2 3
TIMI SCORE GRACE SCORE
Hamm W et al. European Heart Journal (2007) 28, 1598–1660; Hamm CW et al. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999 – 3054
GRACE SCORE
Predictor Score Predictor Score Predictor Score
Age, years Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) Killip class
< 40 0 < 80 63 I 0
40 - 49 18 80 – 99 58 II 21
50 - 59 36 100 - 119 47 III 43
60 - 69 55 120 - 139 37 IV 64
70 - 79 73 140 - 159 26
Predictor Score
80 91 160 - 199 11
Cardiac arrest 43
> 200 0 at admission
Khalill R et al. Exp Clin Cardiol.2009; 14(2): e25 – e30 High > 140 >3
29
Kaplan–Meier Cumulative Risk of the Primary Outcome (death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), Stratified
According to GRACE Risk Score at Baseline.
Mehta, SR et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2165-75.
CRUSADE SCORE
Predictor Score Predictor Score Predictor Score
Hematokrit (%) Frekwensi nadi , x / menit Prior Vascular Disease
<31 9 ≤ 70 9 No 0
31-33.9 7 71-80 7 Yes 6
34 – 36.9 3 81 – 90 3 Diabetes Mellitus
37 – 39.9 2 91 - 100 2 No 0
≥ 40 0 101 - 110 0 Yes 6
Creatinine Clearance, ml/min 111 - 120 10 Systolic Blood Pressure at
≥ 121 11 admission
≤ 15 39 ≤ 90 10
Sex
> 15 - 30 35 91 - 100 8
Male 0
> 30 - 60 28 101 - 120 5
Female 8
> 60 - 90 17 121 - 180 1
Sign of CHF at admission
> 90 - 120 7 181 - 200 3
No 0
>120 0 ≥ 201 5
Yes 7
Very low (bleeding score 20); low (bleeding score 21 to 30); moderate (bleeding score 31 to 40); high (bleeding score 41 to 50): and very
high (bleeding score 50)
Subherwal S et al. Circulation. 2009;119:1873-1882
Choosing the right
Antiplatelet in ACS
Initial Treatment when an ACS diagnosis appears likely based
on ESC NSTEACS Guideline1,2
32 Reference: 1. Hamm CW et al. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32:2999-30354; 2. Roffi M et al. Eur Heart J 2016;37(3):267-315
PLATELET Plays Important Role in
Thrombus Formation
Thienopyridine
• Ticlopidine
• Clopidogrel
• Prasugrel
Reversible
P2Y12
inhibitors
• Ticagrelor
• Cangrelor
GPIIb/Iia Antagonists • Elinogrel
34
Antiplatelet recommendation in Updated ACS
Guidelines
1. Roffi M et al. Eur Heart J 2016;37(3):267-315;2.Ibanez B et al. European *Not yet approved and
Heart Journal (2017) 00, 1–66 available in Indonesia
35
Profile P2Y12 inhibitor
80 80
60 DAY 1 60
40 40
Mean IPA, %
Mean IPA, %
20 20
0 0
0 2 4 8 12 0 2 4 8 12
100 100
80 80
60 60
40
DAY 14 40
20 20
2nd dose
0 0
0 2 4 8 12 24 0 2 4 8 12 24
Time, h Time, h
50 41%
* ticagrelor
Vs.
40 CLOPI 75 mg qd
8% clopidogrel ‡
30
†
Catatan : penelitian ini dilakukan pada pasien CAD yang
20 mengkonsumsi aspirin tanpa riwayat ACS <1 tahun
Ticagrelor belum mendapatkan persetujuan untuk
10 populasi pasien ini.
CLO 600 mg
0
0 0.5 1 2 4 8 24 6 weeks 0 2 4 8 24 48 72 120 168 240
PLATO Study:
• 43 countries
• 862 sites 18,624
43862
countries
patients
sites
• 18,624 patients
P = N/A P = NS P = 0.001
(%)death (%)
5.50
5.10 5.10
CV deathCV
4.00
Rateofofcomposite
2.40
2.10
Rate
1.Yusuf S et al. N Engl J Med 2001;345; 2.Wiviott SD e tal. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001-15; 3.Wallentin L, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–1057.
* Prasugrel is not yet approved and available in Indonesia
ESC STEMI 2017 : Ticagrelor is preferred OAP before
clopidogrel – STEMI undergoing Primary PCI
ESC NSTEACS 2015:
Ticagrelor is preferred OAP for NSTEACS
Ticagrelor
2.5
Cumulative incidence of primary outcome,
Clopidogrel
2
TIMI major bleeding (KM%)
1.5
1
0.5
P value non inferiority <0.001
0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
Time (days)
1. Berwanger O et al. JAMA Cardiol 2018 doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0612; 2. Berwanger O et al. JAMA Cardiol 2018
doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0612 Supplementary Appendix
ESC Guidelines 2017 :
Adjunctive antiplatelet therapy to support reperfusion with fibrinolytic
therapy1,2
1. Ibanez B et al. European Heart Journal (2017) 00, 1–66; 2. Valgimigli, et al. European Heart Journal (2017) 0, 1–48
Identify patients for more potent
DAPT
CRUSADE score
GRACE score
Very high > 50
Bleeding Risk
Moderate = 31 – 40
Intermediate risk: 109 – 140
In-hospital death: 1-3 %
Low = 21 – 30
Ischemic Risk
49
Agewall S et al. European Heart Journal (2013) 34, 1708–1715
ESC 2017 Focused Update DAPT in CAD : 50
Class I LOE B
Class Iib LOE C
UA / NSTEMI STEMI
53 • Steg PG et al. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2569–2619; 3.Hamm CW et al. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999 – 3054
Optimizing ACS Management in Referral Hospital
STEMI
Identify symptom onset
choose the right reperfusion strategy
Do it as early as possible
NSTEACS
Do not underestimated the risk
Do risk stratification
Refer for invasive for High Risk Patients