You are on page 1of 4

Presentation Scoring Rubrics

Unit 1
Note: 1= lowest; 5 = highest
Name Name Name Name
The presenters …

1. clearly explained the


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
habit or activity.

2. clearly explained the


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
benefits.

3. supported their points


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
with evidence.

4. emphasized key details. 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

5. used pauses effectively. 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

6. used visuals effectively. 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

What did you like?

What could be improved?

Unit 2
Note: 1= lowest; 5 = highest
Name Name Name Name
The presenters …

1. clearly argued for their


position using opinions, 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
reasons, and examples.

2. effectively responded to
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
the other team’s
position.
3. presented other people’s
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
points of view.

4. stressed important
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
information.

Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

What did you like?

What could be improved?

Presentation Scoring Rubrics 1


Unit 3
Note: 1= lowest; 5 = highest
Name Name Name Name
The presenters …

1. clearly explained the


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
benefits of listening.

2. used gestures to
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
emphasize and clarify.

3. used humor. 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

What did you like?

What could be improved?

Unit 4
Note: 1= lowest; 5 = highest
Name Name Name Name
The presenters …

1. presented their example


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
clearly.

2. followed a clear, logical


organization when 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
presenting.

3. explained causal
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
relationships clearly.

4. distinguished facts from


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
opinions.

Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

What did you like?

What could be improved?

2 Presentation Scoring
Unit 5
Note: 1= lowest; 5 = highest
Name Name Name Name
The presenters …

1. described the emotion


and showed what it 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
can teach us.

2. supported the message


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
with a personal story.

3. repeated important
information by 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
paraphrasing.

4. asked questions. 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

5. spoke in natural thought


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
groups.

Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

What did you like?

What could be improved?

Unit 6
Note: 1= lowest; 5 = highest
Name Name Name Name
The presenters …

1. developed and presented


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
a memorable slogan.

2. connected with the


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
audience.

3. used connected speech


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
to sound natural.

Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

What did you like?

What could be improved?

Presentation Scoring Rubrics 3


Unit 7
Note: 1= lowest; 5 = highest
Name Name Name Name
The presenter …

1. described the site or


service and explained why 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
reputation is important.

2. described the experience


and how it affected his 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
or her life.

3. included effective
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
supporting details.

4. helped listeners follow


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
his or her ideas.

5. used emphasis for a


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
purpose.

Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

What did you like?

What could be improved?

Unit 8
Note: 1= lowest; 5 = highest
Name Name Name Name
The presenter …

1. had clearly rehearsed


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
prior to presenting.

2. described how analyzing


data led or could lead 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
to improvements.

3. strongly expressed his


1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
or her point of view.

4. used stress and intonation


to express comparisons 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
and contrasts.

Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

What did you like?

What could be improved?

4 Presentation Scoring

You might also like