Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MA3264CHAP6
MA3264CHAP6
Denition. Let f be a function dened for all t 0. The Laplace transform of f is the function F (s)
dened by
Z 1
F (s) = L(f ) = e st f (t)dt; (1)
0
The original function f (t) in (1) is called the inverse transform or inverse of F (s) and is denoted by
L (F ); i.e.,
1
f (t) = L (F (s)):
1
Notation: Original functions are denoted by lower case letters and their Laplace transforms by the same
letters in capitals. Thus F (s) = L(f (t)), Y (s) = L(y (t)) etc.
Z 1 Z b
h(t) dt = lim h(t)dt
0
b!1 0
and the integral is said to converge if this limit exists. Because e st decreases so rapidly with t, the Laplace
transform usually does exist [there are exceptions, however], and then we say that the function f HAS A
1
Example 1. Let f (t) = eat , when t 0.
Find F (s).
Solution.
F (s) = L(eat )
Z 1
= e st eat dt
0
Z b
= lim e st eat dt:
b!1 0
Now
Z b
a s)t dt = b b(a if s = a
e
a s if s 6= a.
(
e s) 1
0 a s
a, 1 e a
R
If s < a, a s > 0 and e a s b
( )
! 1 as b ! 1. Thus when s 0
( s)t dt diverges. When s > a,
1
F (s) = L(eat ) = ; s > a: (2)
s a
Solution. This function is the same as the one in Example 1 with a = 0, thus,
1
L(1) = ; s > 0: (3)
s
The Laplace transform is a linear operation; i.e., the Laplace transform of a linear combination of functions
2
Theorem
As a corollary, the inverse Laplace transform also satises the linearity property.
s
= ; s > a 0:
s 2
a 2
Example 4. If F (s) = s + s ,
3 5
7
nd f (t) = L (F ).
1
s s 7
= 3 1 + 5 e t = 3 + 5e t :
7 7
3
Example 5. Set a = iw in the formula (2)
1 s + iw
= =
s iw s +w
2 2
n = 0; 1; 2; : : :.
Solution. Z 1
L(tn ) = e st tn dt
0
1
= e st tn j 1
s 0
n
Z 1
+ e st tn dt:
1
s 0
n
L(tn ) = L(tn ) 1
s
n(n 1) : : : 1
= L(1)
sn
n!
= n : (8)
s +1
4
Example 7. Given F (s) = s2s , nd L (F (s)).
2 +5
+9
1
Solution.
2s + 5 2s 5
L 1
=L 1
+
s +9
2
s +9 s +9
2 2
s 5 3
= 2L 1
+ L 1
s +9
2
3 s +9
2
5
= 2 cos 3t + sin 3t:
3
One of the nice things about Laplace transforms is that they are dened by integration, and, unlike
dierentiation, integration doesn't care whether the function is continuous or not. In fact it is easy to dene
the Laplace transform of a function whose graph is broken up into pieces. More formally:
A function f (t) dened for t 0 has a jump discontinuity at a 2 [0; 1) if the one sided limits
Theorem Suppose that f (t) is continuous and has a well-dened Laplace transform on [0; 1) and f 0 (t) is
Proof. First consider the case when f 0 (t) is continuous for [0; 1). Then
Z 1
0
L(f ) = e st f 0 (t)dt
0
1 Z 1
= e st f (t) +s e st f (t)dt
0 0
If f 0 is merely piecewise continuous, the proof is quite similar; in this case, the range of integration in
the original integral must be split into parts such that f 0 is continuous in each such part.
f n ( 1)
(0): (12)
Solution. Here f (t) = sin t, f 0 (t) = 2 sin t cos t = sin 2t, f (0) = 0. In view of (7) we obtain
2
2
=
s +4
2
= 2 cos t f (t)
2
7
:: by (11), L(f 00 ) = 2L(cos t) L(f ) = s L(f ):
2 2
y(0) = k ; y0 (0) = k
0 1 (13)
with a, b, k and k constants. The function r(t) has the Laplace transform R(s).
0 1
Step 1. Take the Laplace transform of both sides of the d.e. using the linearity property of the Laplace
transform.
Step 2. Use the given initial conditions to arrive at the subsidiary equation
s L(y) sk
2
0 k + a(sL(y) k ) + bL(y) = L(r):
1 0
(s + a)k + k + R(s)
L(y) = 0 1
:
s + as + b
2
8
Step 4. Reduce the above to a sum of terms whose inverses can be found, so that the solution y(t) of (13)
is obtained.
y(0) = 0, y0 (0) = 1.
Solution. Taking the Laplace transform of both sides of the d.e. and using initial conditions we arrive at
1
s L(y) sy(0) y0 (0) + L(y) =
2
:
s 2
:: L(y) = s2 1
+1
1+ s 1
2
= s s s2
( 2)(
1
+1)
.
Now
s 1 A Bs + C
= +
(s 2)(s + 1) s 22
s +1 2
for appropriate constants A, B and C . Multiply both sides of this equation by (s 2)(s + 1) and equate
2
C= . 3
5
:: L (y ) = 1
5
s 1
2
s
s
3
5( 2 +1)
= s 1 s + s2 3
.
5( 2) s
5( 2 +1) 5( +1)
Taking the inverse transform of both sides we get (using (2), (6), and (7))
1 1 3
y(t) = e t 2
cos t + sin t:
5 5 5
9
Transform of the integral of a function
Theorem. If f (t) is piecewise continuous and has a well-dened Laplace transform on [0; 1), then
Z t
1
L f ( )d = L(f ) (s > 0; s > a): (14)
0 s
Solution.
L w1 sin wt
::
=
s +w
2
1
2
1
=
s( s + w )
2 2
and
Z t
1 1 sin wt
L (1 cos w )d = L (t )
w 2
0 w 2
w
1
= :
s (s + w )
2 2 2
:: f (t) = w2 t wt
w .
1 sin
Theorem. (s-Shifting)
10
Thus using the formulae (8), (6), and (7) we obtain
n!
L(ect tn ) =
(s c)n +1
s c
L(ect cos wt) =
(s c) + w
2 2
w
L(ect sin wt) = :
(s c) + w
2 2
y(0) = 2, y0 (0) = 4.
2(s + 1) 2
=
(s + 1) + 2
2 2
(s + 1) + 22 2
y(0) = 1, y0 (0) = 0.
1 1
= +
s 1 s2
or
1 1
(s 2
2s + 1)L(y ) = s 2+ +
s 1 s 2
11
or
s 2 1 1
L( y ) = + +
(s 1) 2
(s 1) 3
s (s 1)
2 2
1 1 1
= +
s 1 (s 1) 2
(s 1) 3
1 2 1 2
+ + +
(s 1) 2
s 1 s 2
s
:: y(t) = t et et + t + 2 = ( t 1)et + t + 2.
2 2
2 2
Denition.
u(t a) = 01;; t<a
t>a (16)
(
0; t<a
u(t a) u(t b) = 1; a<t<b
0; t > b.
(
0 if t < a
g(t)(u(t a) u(t b)) = g(t) if a < t < b
0 t > b.
You can think of this in the following way: this function is \OFF" until t = a. Then it suddenly turns
\ON" the function g(t). It remains \ON" until t = b, where it suddenly switches \OFF" again. You can
easily imagine lots of engineering situations where this might be useful, for example in circuit theory. Notice
12
that this function is usually DISCONTINUOUS, but this won't be a problem for the Laplace transform,
because the transform is dened by an integral, and discontinuous functions can often be integrated. In
fact, the main advantage of the Laplace transform is that it allows us to solve ODEs with discontinuous
+ (2 t)(u(t 1)
When
0 < t < 1 g (t) = 2 1 + t 0 + (3 t) 0 3 0 = 2
=2+t
t > 4 g(t) = 2 1 + t 1 + (3 t) 1 3 1 = 2
13
Theorem. (t-Shifting)
e as
L(u(t a)) = : (18)
s
Solution.
L(t u(t 1)) = L((t 1 + 1) u(t 1))
2 2
= L(((t 1) + 2(t
2
1) + 1)u(t 1))
2 2 1
= e s ( + + ):
s 3
s 2
s
Solution.
L((et + 1)u(t 2)) = L((et e + 1)u(t 2))
2 2
e 2
1
=e s 2
+ :
s 1 s
14
The next and nal problem in this section is rather complicated, but it really just involves assembling
a lot of small bits and pieces. Notice that NONE of the methods we learned in earlier chapters would have
allowed us to solve this problem, so it should convince you that the Laplace Transform is really useful!
with
(
1; 0<t<1
g(t) = .
0; t>1
Solution.
:
Taking the Laplace transform of both sides of the d.e. we obtain, using (18),
s L(y) sy(0) y0 (0) + 3(sL(y) y(0)) + 2L(y)
2
1 e s
=
s s
so that,
s+1 1
L(y) = e s :
s(s + 3s + 2)
2
s(s + 3s + 2)
2
Now
s+1 s+1
=
s(s + 3s + 2) s(s + 1)(s + 2)
2
1
=
s(s + 2)
1 1 1
=
2 s s+2
15
:: L (s s
1 1
( +2)
) = (1
1
2
e t ).
2
Also
1 1
=
s(s + 3s + 2)
2
s(s + 1)(s + 2)
1 1 1 1
= +
2 s s+2 s+1
:: L 1 2t
s(s+1)(s+2) = 2 (1 + e )
1 1
e t
::
e s
L 1
s(s + 1)(s + 2)
1 t
= (1 + e 2( 1)
) e t ( 1)
u(t 1):
2
[using (17)]
Finally
1
y(t) = (1 e t ) 2
2
1 t
(1 + e 2( 1)
) e t ( 1)
u(t 1):
2
The Laplace Transform, as a mapping from functions of t to functions of s, is not surjective, that is,
given F (s) there need not exist any f (t) such that L(f ) = F . But sometimes it is very useful to bend the
denition of the word, \function" so that certain functions of s do have a sort of inverse Laplace transform.
There is one extremely important function of s whose inverse Laplace transform we would like to have,
16
namely the exponential function e as . Strangely, this function does not have an inverse Laplace transform
in the ordinary sense. But it does have one in an extraordinary sense, as follows.
Clearly,
e as
1 e a hs
( + )
L (fa;h ) =
h s s
1 e a hs ( + )
e as
= :
s h
Now if h is very small, the expression in brackets on the right is approximately the derivative of e xs with
1
L (fa;h ) ( s) e as
s
or
L (fa;h ) e as :
The approximation can be made as good as desired by choosing h suciently small. So it seems that we have
the answer to our question. But let's think more closely about what happens to fa;h (t) when h is extremely
small.
Evidently fa;h (t) is non-zero only on the very small region between a and a + h. But its value in there is
extremely large, 1=h. So in fact the area under its graph is always the same, namely 1, no matter how small
17
h may be. In short, the graph of fa;h (t) is like a spike sitting at t = a: very tall, very narrow, with area
1. When h is extremely small, let's give fa;h (t) a name: we call it (t a), the Dirac delta function. So we
L ((t a)) e as ;
and clearly
Z 1
(t a)dt = 1:
0
Now since the approximation can be arbitrarily good, we get a bit sloppy here and replace the by =. That
is, we picture the spike as being \really" innitely narrow above t = a, and also innitely tall, still having
\area" 1. That is, we take it that this strange thing is the inverse Laplace transform of e as .
These peculiar objects can be put on a mathematically rigorous foundation: google \Distributions (mathe-
matics)". But for our purposes it is enough to think of the delta function as a very tall and narrow function
around t = a, where \very narrow" means \negligible relative to the typical time scales of our problem".
For example, the time a cricket ball or baseball is in contact with the bat is negligible compared with the
time it takes for the players to react to the change in the motion of the ball.
In summary: L 1
[e as ] = (t a); where (t a) denotes a \function" which represents an arbitrarily
narrow and tall \spike" at t = a, which nevertheless has a nite area (equal to 1) under its \graph".
L [1] = (t);
1
18
and consequently
L [c] = c(t)
1
for any constant c. So now we have nally discovered which \functions" have constants as their Laplace
transforms.
EXAMPLE: INJECTIONS!
Suppose that a doctor injects, almost instantly, 100 mg of morphine into a patient at time t = 1 day. He
does it again one day later, at t = 2. Suppose that the HALF-LIFE of morphine in the patient's body is 18
Solution: Half-life refers to the exponential function e kt . \Half-life 18 hours" = 0.75 days means 1
2
=
`n(2)
e k : , that is, k =
0 75
= 0:924. So without the injections,
0:75
dy
= ky; k = 0:924:
dt
The injections are at a rate of 100 mg per day, but concentrated in delta-function spikes at t = 1 and t = 2
dy = ky + 100(t 1) + 100(t 2)
dt
By the way, notice that we have to think of the delta function as something which itself has UNITS. In
19
this case you should think of the delta function as something that has units of [1/time], so that this equation
has consistent units. In many problems, it is actually very helpful to work out what units the delta function
has | it can have dierent units in dierent problems! This is particularly useful in physics problems where
something gets hit suddenly and gains some momentum instantly | you can use this in some of the tutorial
problems.
Since y (0) = 0,
100e s 100e s 2
L(y) = +
s + 0:924 s + 0:924
y = 100e : t
0 924( 1)
u(t 1) + 100e :
0 924( t 2)
u(t 2);
which you can easily graph using graphmatica (type in y = exp( 0:924(x 1))step(x 1) + exp( 0:924(x
2))step(x 2)).
Sometimes it happens, in Engineering applications, that you have a system whose nature you understand
[for example, you may know that it is a damped harmonic oscillator] but you don't know the values of the
parameters [the spring constant, the mass, the friction coecient]. In such a case, what you can do is to
\poke" the system with a sudden, sharp force, and watch how it behaves. Then you can reconstruct the
which is initially at rest, that is, x(0) = x_ (0) = 0. and you poke it with a unit impulse [change of momentum
= 1 in MKS units] at time t = 1; in other words, the applied force is just (t 1). You observe that the
note that this oscillator is underdamped, despite the shape of the graph!] Question: what are the values of
With the given initial data, taking the Laplace transform gives
and so
e s
X (s) = :
Ms + bs + k
2
But the Laplace transform of the given response function is [using both t-shifting and s-shifting!]
e s e s
X (s) = = ;
(s + 1) + 1
2
s + 2s + 2
2
21
so by inspection we see that M = 1, b = 2, k = 2 in MKS units, and we have successfully reconstructed the
parameters of this system, just by hitting it with a delta function impulse! Similar ideas work for electrical
If you look at the graph of the solution you will see that the derivative jumps suddenly at t = 1; that is,
there is a sharp corner there. This is typical in problems involving delta-function impulses, basically because
such impulses cause the momentum, and therefore the velocity, to change suddenly.
So far we have always assumed that one is given y (0), y 0 (0), y 00 (0) and so on. But what if you are given the
y00 + y = 0;
given y (=2) = 1, y 0 (=2) = 1, instead of y (0) and y 0 (0)? Answer: we pretend that we know y (0) and y 0 (0),
and work them out later. Let's call y (0) = and y 0 (0) = . Then taking the Laplace transform as usual,
we have
sY
2
s + Y = 0;
or
Y = (s + )=(1 + s );
2
22
so that
y = cos(x) + sin(x):
Now we can use y (=2) = 1, y 0 (=2) = 1 to get two equations for and . You will nd that = 1 and
23