Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heat-Injured Bacteria 1
ROGER DABBAH and W. A. MOATS
Market Quality Research Division, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705
and
J. F. MATTICK
University of Maryland, Department of Dairy Science, College Park 20740
A D
8m
6.
4-
MI
<
_J
Q. 8. f
< 6,
qJ) f A'~A~A"~'4"A'~
I--
Z
41
0
I,,-
Z
0v
____/
u_
0 I0.,~
S. IA"
I,,,- -----o---- NOT HEATED
6-
< A----" HEATED
o 4.
0
.J
2.
10.
/ - - o.
A
8.
6- /../ ,/
Md
I-- m 1
/ ..... heated
a. ! not heated
2. /
1
1
I-- 0- ~o --o
Z
O
I--
Z 10.
O
O B.
M.
O 6.
o tsb
• basal
~"
I--
4
/ "~ 0--- - - 0 - -
/
'~ 2, /
O
I
O /
0- - - ~ _-_-_p_: -o
i i
I I I I l I i I I
48 96 144 192 2 0
HOURS OF INCUBATION
t~im 2. Growth curve of heated and unheated Pseudo~onas sp. (Culture :18) when incubaLed at 20 O
in the heating medium (tsb: trypticase soy broth, or basal: basal minimal medium). Each count of the
heated bacteria represents the average count per millillter of the whole content o2 duplicate ampules
(30 n~).
A. Initial inoculum of 105/m].
B. Initial inoculum of 101°/rid.
l~or convenience in illustrating, the ]ogaxithm of no detectable survivors is plotted as 0.
tion. This is proof that bacteria can recover Factors involved in heat resistance. The
under conditions unsuitable for multiplication. physiological state of the bacteria, the type o2
I n a similar experiment (Fig. 2-A), where heating medium, and type of recovery medium
the initial inoculum was 105 to 106 rather than used all influenced recovery.
109 to 101°, recovery was faster (48 to 72 hr) Bacteria (Culture 18) from 14- to 16-hr
and multiplication did take place after recovery. cultures did not recover, whereas those from
No recovery was observed at either level of 24-hr cultures did, in line with the generally
inoculum when basal medium was used instead accepted fact that actively growing bacteria
of trypticase soy broth in these experiments are less heat resistant than resting bacteria.
(Fig. 2-A and B). When bacteria from Culture 18 were grown in
J. DAI~Y SCIENCE VOL. 52, NO. 5
612 D A B B A H ET AL.
milk whey and heated in it, some survivors effective in promoting recovery. These recovery
were found immediately after heating; none experiments were all carried out by incubation
was found immediately after heating when the at 20 C; however, it was determined that re-
bacteria were grown in trypticase soy broth covery could also take place at 4 C in trypti-
and heated in the whey. This shows that the case soy broth, although holding for two to
growth medium can affect heat resistance. Sur- three weeks was required.
vivors also were found in shaken trypticase soy
broth cultures immediately after heating, Discussion
whereas none was found in heated stationary The results obtained show unequivocally that
cultures. some bacterial ceils that appear killed by heat
Effect of heati~g medium. I t was observed may recover and grow normally after incuba-
that more complex heating media resulted in tion for long periods in a favorable medium.
shorter recovery times after incubation in tryp- Plate counts on trypticase soy agar incubated
ticase soy broth, indicating that the complex for 48 to 72 hr showed no survivors in the broth
media protected the bacteria from heat injury. cultures for periods of up to nine days, after
In the complete trypticase soy broth medium which survivors appeared and grew normally.
containing trypticase, phytone, glucose, sodium I t is possible that colonies might have formed
chloride, dipotassium phosphate, and glucose, on trypticase soy agar plates if they had been
recovery occurred after 48 hr of incubation at incubated longer. I t was proven that no viable
20 C. Omission of sodium chloride, or glucose, survivors were present in the ampules after
or both, resulted in recovery after 96 hr. Ab- heating by plating the entire contents of the
sence of trypticase from the heating medium ampule. This eliminated any possibility of
resulted in no recovery up to 240 hr of incu- overlooking a small number of survivors. While
bation at 20 C in fresh trypticase soy broth, it is possible that a small number of uninjured
indicating the protective effect of trypticase survivors might be missed immediately after
during heat treatment. I n the absence of phy- heating, they would certainly multiply suffi-
tone, recovery occurred after 216 hr of incuba- ciently in 24 hr to be readily detectable. How-
tion and no recovery was observed after heating ever, no survivors were noted for as long as
in the basal medium. Milk whey was slightly nine days, so that possibility of uninjured sur-
less effective than trypticase soy broth in sta- vivors clearly can be ruled out. Accidental re-
bilizing the bacteria to heat, as recovery oc- contamination is another possibility. This was
curred after 72 hr of incubation. I t was also ruled out by carrying out the experiment in
observed that if bacteria were spun down and sealed ampules so that recontamination was
resuspended in basal medium without washing, unlikely.
the small amount of trypticase soy broth re- The recovery period can be considered to be
maining with the bacteria gave significant pro- an extended lag period resulting from severe
tection from heat. injury to the bacterial cells. I t differs from the
Effect of recovery n~edium. I n trypticase soy usual concept of a lag period in being longer
broth, the most favorable medium for recovery, and in that no viable cells can be detected dur-
bacteria were detected after 48 hr, whereas no ing the recovery period, whereas viable cells
recovery occurred when they were incubated in can be demonstrated in a lag period but they
basal medium after heating in broth. When fail to multiply. The recovery phenomenon
bacteria were washed after heating and resus- was also found with five species of Salmonella,
pended in the supernatant in which they were as well as with the test culture under the par-
heated, recovery was no faster than when they ticular experimental conditions used. I t is
were suspended in the fresh broth, indicating probable that this phenomenon is a general
that no recovery-promoting agents were leached one and will occur with all types of bacteria,
out of the cells during heating. Recovery was following heating under certain combinations
much slower in milk whey, requiring more than of time and temperature just below the point
144 to 168 hr, as compared to more than 48 at which there are no surviving cells. The tem-
to 72 hr in trypticase soy broth after heating perature used with the test culture was 55 C,
in this broth. No recovery was observed after considerably below the normal pasteurization
heating in a basal broth medium supplemented temperature of 62 C, and recovery could not be
by trypticase and glucose and incubating in the demonstrated after heating to 60 C for 30 rain.
same fresh medium, or after heating in trypti- However, it is conceivable that recovery could
case soy broth and incubating in the basal sup- occur after heating at pasteurization tempera-
plemented medium. This indicates that trypti- ture, if the strain of bacteria used were slightly
case alone in the liquid recovery broth was in- more heat-resis.tant. I t should further be em-
J. DAIRY SCIEI~CE VOL. 52, NO. 5
HEAT RESISTANCE OF BACTERIA 613
comparison of four agar media. J. Bae- (26) Sinskey, T. J., A. H. MeIntosh, I. S. Pablo,
teriol., 45: 395. G. J. Silverman, and S. A. Goldblith. ]964.
(21) Nelson, F. E. 1944. Factors which influence Considerations in the recovery of microor-
the growth of heat treated bacteria. II. ganisms from freeze-dried foods. Health
Further studies on media. J. Bacteriol., Lab. Sci. 1. (Offic. Publ. Lab. Section
48 : 473. U.S. Public Health Serv.
(22) Postgate, J. R., and J. R. Hunter. 1963. (27) Standard Methods for the Examination of
Metabolic injury in frozen bacteria, g. Dairy Products. 1960. ] l t h ed. American
Appl. Bacteriol., 26: 405. Public Health Association, Inc., New York.
(23) Postgate, g. R., and J. R. Hunter. 1963. (28) Straka, R. P., and J. L. Stokes. 1959. Meta-
The survival of starved bacteria. J. Appl. bolic injury to bacteria at low temperature.
Bacteriol., 26: 295. J. Bacteriol., 78: 181.
(24) Rahn, O., and M. N. Barnes. 1933. An (29) Thomas, S. B., J. M. Griffiths, and J. B.
experimental comparison of different cri- Foulkes. 1960. Psychrophilic bacteria in
teria of death in yeast, g. Gen. Physiol., pasteurized milk. Dairy Eng., 77: 438.
16 : 579. (30) Thomas, S. B., P. M. Hobson, and E. R.
(25) Rogick, F. A., and L. H. Burgwald. 1952. Bird. 1959. Psychrophilie bacteria in milk.
Some factors which contribute to the psy- X V t h Int. Dairy Congr., 2: 1334. London.
chrophilic bacteria count in market milk. (31) Witter, L. D. 1961. Psychrophilic bacteria.
J. Milk Food Technol., 15: 181. A review. J. Dairy Sci., 44: 983.