Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

https://www.sciendo.com

The construction of cross-regional cooperation innovation network governance

system based on data fusion technology

Yue Cheng1,†, Chi Tian2

1. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Guang Xi, Nanning, Guangxi, 530004,
China
2. Liaoning Institute of Science and Engineering, Jinzhou, Liaoning, 121000, China

Submission Info

Communicated by Juan Luis García Guirao

Received June 8, 2022
Accepted October 10, 2022
Available online April 17, 2023

Abstract
In recent years, with the development of network computer science and the increasing maturity of artificial intelligence
technology, data fusion technology has been applied more and more widely. In order to respond to real-life needs and
prevent and resolve risks, it helps to further broaden the research path of network governance. This paper focuses on
network governance in the era of Internet big data, and uses an algorithm based on data fusion technology to calculate
the judgment data, calculation formula and posterior estimates by computing the feature vector X and the measurement
value I. After finding the maximum posterior estimate, the probability of evidence under the hypothesis is calculated
using the subjective probability as the prior probability of the hypothesis. A multi-degree-of-freedom model is established
for simulation research, so as to build a diversified, collaborative and intelligent innovative network social governance
system across regional cooperation. The experiment proves that when the threshold value c = 0.4, the performance and
efficiency are the best, and it is more able to enhance the leading position of the mainstream value and the assessment
mechanism of the relevant departments, which can accelerate the guarantee of the implementation of the network
ecological governance system on the ground.

Keywords: Data fusion technology; Network governance; Cross-regional cooperation; Social governance system;
Bayes-algorithm
AMS 2020 codes: 91D25

†Corresponding author.
Email address: chengyuexida@163.com ISSN 2444-8656
https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.1.00136
© 2023 Yue Cheng and Chi Tian, published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution alone 4.0 License.
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

1 Introduction

Data fusion is a new direction of systematic scientific research arising from the intersection, synthesis,
and extension of modern information technology and multiple disciplines [1-2]. As early as the late
1970s, concepts or terms related to information synthesis began to appear in some publicly published
literature. The term "data fusion" has been commonly used for a longer period of time afterwards [3-
4]. Although a lot of results have been achieved in data fusion research, no unified theoretical
framework has been formed in theory, and there is a lack of effective guiding principles in practical
system design. It is a formal framework whose process involves the synthesis of multiple sources of
information using mathematical methods and technical tools with the aim of obtaining high quality
useful information, with a precise definition of high quality dependent on the application [5-6].
Therefore, various types and levels of fusion exist, such as data fusion, image fusion, feature fusion,
decision fusion, sensor fusion, classifier fusion, etc. [7]. Fusion mainly synthesizes information from
different sources, modes, media, times, places, and representations, which can finally lead to a more
accurate description of the perceived object [8-10].

With the widespread use of the Internet in economic, political and social life around the world, the
integration of Internet space and social space in the traditional sense is occurring in a realistic sense.
On the one hand, more and more real social life takes place in the Internet, and social actions that
originally need to take place in the physical scene can be realized in the Internet scene [11-14]. On
the other hand, online actions that originally took place only in the Internet scene have increasingly
important real social impacts, in some cases directly related to real public issues, people-state
relations. With the continuous development of society and the change of media environment, the
network ecology has also changed, which inevitably brings some network chaos [15]. For example,
due to the drive of economic interests and imperfect market competition mechanism, the phenomenon
of one-sided pursuit of commercialization and perfunctory fulfillment of social responsibilities by
various interest subjects in cyberspace has occurred from time to time. In addition, the popularity of
network terminals also allows more subjects to participate in the dissemination of network
information, and in the massive amount of network information, many information is difficult to
distinguish true from false, and some wrong values are circulated from time to time, etc. [16-18]. The
unhealthy development of the network ecosystem is detrimental to the spread of socialist core values,
the formation of social cohesion, and the development of socioeconomic culture [19-20]. Therefore,
in the system of online social governance, governance for online communities should be given more
attention, and online communities themselves should play a more important role in the system of
online social governance [21-22]. In response to several prominent contradictions in the current
cyberspace, namely, the contradiction between the development of cyberspace and cybersecurity, the
contradiction between the demand for free flow of information and social stability, the contradiction
between the demand for new technologies and new business changes in the Internet and the existing
system, and the contradiction between the exploitation of big data resources and the protection of
citizens' privacy, there is an urgent need to accelerate the construction and build a comprehensive
network governance system. Therefore, the construction of a network ecological governance system
is of far-reaching significance for the sustainable development of the network ecological environment
[23-25].

In the current network ecological environment, the concept of rule of law is gradually strengthened,
and the literature [26] points out that the governance of cyberspace under the rule of law is an
inevitability of the times, an inevitable requirement for the implementation of the rule of law strategy,
and an inevitable choice for the governance of the network society. However, there are some real
challenges and problems in the Internet governance in the current environment, such as the lack of
system, the legal system is not sound, and the awareness of the rule of law has not been fully formed.
It is recommended to build the Internet, use the Internet and manage the Internet according to the law.
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

The literature [27] is devoted to network governance, adopting a dynamic perspective on how
networks act, change, and can be governed. To this end, it examines network dynamics and evolution.
The literature [28] shows that building an integrated network governance system requires a holistic
perspective and an integrated governance paradigm. It can be explored in four aspects: generative
logic, problem logic, thinking logic and action logic. Among them, time evolution, contradiction
transformation, kinetic energy conversion and pattern evolution constitute the generation logic of
governance, presenting the historical inevitability of building an integrated network governance
system; the whole picture of the cyberspace problem, the essential attributes of the integrated system
and the mirror image of reality constitute the problem logic, presenting the practical necessity of an
integrated system; holistic thinking, correlation thinking, big data thinking, mass thinking and cross-
border integration thinking constitute the thinking logic, presenting the system science methodology;
the leading ideas, goal orientation and means standardization based on the principle of subjective co-
governance constitute the action logic, reflecting the feasibility of building such an integrated system.
The comprehensive network governance system is an important part of the social governance
structure [29]. It gives full play to the advantages of socialism, pools forces, and uses a variety of
means to comprehensively manage network conflicts and problems. The core tasks of government in
integrated cyber governance are responsibility management, uncertainty management, structure
management and legitimacy management, which put new demands on government officials in the
integrated cyber governance system. Therefore, regulating the functions of government officials in
the comprehensive network governance system and tapping into the character of government officials
therein have important implications for creating a clear cyberspace environment and building a social
governance pattern of shared governance. Online public sphere is a new public sphere and a new
normative body whose existence and development imply a radical change in the spatial structure of
government governance in the national governance system [30]. When we face the new public
management issues arising from online public opinion and its formation, we must go beyond the
Habermasian base and re-establish and maintain public management based on the "state-network" in
the online public sphere, and build a "government-network domain" relationship. Under the concept
of rule of law, we will build a new order based on the public domain of the network and government
governance. At the present stage, China's network governance process is facing a serious situation,
there are many problems, showing the complexity, enormity and urgency of the governance process.
The government, market and society alone can hardly achieve an effective response, and must be
tripartite participation and cooperation to build a modern comprehensive network governance
mechanism with multiple subjects, diverse means, strong coordination and practical use. However,
the various scenarios proposed above do not allow for the complexities of cross-regional governance.

Therefore, this paper introduces the Bayes-algorithm based on the principle of data fusion to solve
the above problems. Starting from the comprehensive network governance system, we take the cross-
regional cooperation innovation network as the research object and carry out the research of
collaborative governance model according to its characteristics. Based on Internet governance and
social governance, a Bayes algorithm based on a data fusion algorithm is used to compute estimates
and posterior means. And by using the simulation research model to construct the network
governance system, the above values which are derived help us understand the operation mechanism
of cross-regional cooperation innovation network in a deeper level, which can guide the clustering
and flow of innovation factors between regions, promote the diffusion and spillover of innovation
performance, and maximize the benefits of cooperative innovation. From the simulation experiment
results, it is feasible enough to build a diversified, collaborative and intelligent cross-regional
cooperation innovative network social governance system.
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

2 Construction of data fusion technology system

The structure of the system based on data fusion techniques is shown in Figure 1. In this paper, the
information fusion algorithm estimated by Bayes inference shows that in this system the local detector
i ( i = 1,..., n ), makes a local decision ui based on its sampled data, and sends it to the fusion center.
The task of the fusion center is to complete the mapping of the local decision space ui to the output
space u . Here, a cost Crl is specified for each judgment. That is, assume that H r (r = 1, , m) is the
cost paid for u = l (l = 1, , m) judgments.

u1

u2 u
Fusion
Center



un

Figure 1. Data fusion system architecture

According to Bayes, the prior probability of Hr is assumed to be P(Hr). A set of local judgments
u1 , u2 ,, un is obtained, in which both local decisions and posterior probabilities have average cost.
The role of data fusion is to divide the local space into m hypothesis subspaces R1, R2,…,Rm that do
not overlap each other, i.e., to divide the intersection of m subspaces according to the threshold
determined by the criterion of minimizing the average cost, and when u1 , u2 ,, un falls into which
subspace, the corresponding hypothesis is determined to hold, thus realizing the nonlinear
transformation from input to output.

2.1 Convergent computing

The Bayes algorithm is a classical method for solving the inference used to solve uncertainty, and it
is based on the Bayes formula in probability theory, which expresses the confidence level of each
hypothesis in terms of probabilities, and it updates the likelihood function of the hypothesis given the
previous likelihood estimates of the hypothesis and the added evidence. The technique can be
performed based on classical probabilities or on subjective probabilities.

Bayes formula description:

Let the probability events A and B belong to the event domain F and the P ( A) > 0 of the occurrence
of event A. Then it is said that.

P ( AB )
P ( B A) =
P ( A) (1)

The conditional probability of event B occurring under the condition that event A occurs. In Equation
(1), P(AB) is the probability of the event A and B when they both occur.
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

If B1 , B2 ......Bn is a division of the basic event space, and P ( Bi ) > 0, i = 1、

2、......n. Then for anyone A,
P ( A) > 0, there are.

P ( A / Bi ) P ( Bi )
P ( Bi A) =
å P ( A Bi ) P ( Bi )
n

i =1 (2)

Where the P ( Bi ) is obtained from the analysis of existing data, called the prior probability;
P ( Bi / A) is the probability of re-correction after obtaining new information, called the posterior
probability. Equation (2) is the Bayes formula.

2.2 Eigenvectors

Let the state to be measured of the system be the vector X, and the measured value measured by the
sensor is I. The measurement equation of the sensor is

I = f ( X ) +V (3)

where f ( X ) is a function of I and X, and V is the random error.

For data fusion, it is the measured value I1 , I 2 ......, I N obtained from N sensors, from which the true
value of the state is estimated according to some estimation criterion function to determine the
probability of giving evidence that the hypothesis is true.

For a single sensor S1, let its measurements be I and the estimated value of state X be X̂ ( I ) and
define L é Xˆ ( I ) , X ù as the loss function, and according to Bayes estimation, the corresponding risk
ë û
expression is

R = EI éë Xˆ ( I ) , X ùû = ò dI  P ( I ) ò dX  P ( X / I )L éë Xˆ ( I ) , X ùû
(4)

In this equation, P ( I ) detects the distribution pattern of the data, P ( X / I ) is the posterior
probability of state X.

The estimation criterion that takes the least risk must be such that:

¶R
X = Xˆ ( I )
=0
¶X (5)

In order to obtain the estimate of the state XI.

From Equation (4), it can be seen that defining different L é Xˆ ( I ) , X ù , will give different estimation
ë û
results. The commonly used L é Xˆ ( I ) , X ù has the following three forms.
ë û
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

L éë Xˆ ( I ) , X ùû = ( X - Xˆ ) A( X - Xˆ )
T

(6)

where A is the positive definite weight matrix.

12
L éë Xˆ ( I ) , X ùû = éë( X - Xˆ )T A( X - Xˆ ) ùû
(7)

ì e
ï1.. Xˆ ( I ) - X ³
L éë Xˆ ( I ) , X ùû = í 2
e
ï0.. Xˆ ( I ) - X <
î 2 (8)

where e is an arbitrarily small positive number.

And corresponding to the above three forms, the corresponding state-optimal estimates are the
posterior mean estimates.

Xˆ opt ( I ) = ò-¥ XP ( X I )dX

X

(9)

Posterior median estimates.

ò-¥ P ( X I )dX = òXˆ ( I ) P ( X I )dX

( )
Xˆ I +¥

(10)

Maximum posterior estimate.

Xˆ opt ( I ) = max P( X I )
Xˆ (11)

Combined with the a priori knowledge of the likelihood that the assumption is indeed true, an
independent sensor S 2 with measurement I 2 is added to the single sensor, and the measurement of
the original sensor is denoted as I1 , then the optimal estimate X ( I ) sought based on I = ( I1 I 2 ) is
the value after data fusion.

So far, extending Bayes' inference to N independent sensors S1 , S2 ...SN , similarly, the fused values of
the measured data from N sensors based on the loss function defined in Equation (8) can be obtained
as

Xˆ opt ( I1 I 2  I N ) = max P ( X I1I 2 ...I N ) (12)

At this point, the multi-sensor fusion problem is transformed into the problem of how to obtain the
posterior probability P ( X / I ) of state X and find the corresponding maximum posterior estimate
X̂ ( I ) , using the subjective probability as the prior probability of the hypothesis and the probability
of the evidence under the given hypothesis condition.
According to Bayes' formula there are.
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

P ( X ) P ( I1 I 2  I N X )
P ( X I1 I 2  I N ) =
P ( I1 I 2  I N ) (13)

When the measurements of N sensors are statistically independent, then.

P ( I1 , I 2 ,, I N X ) = å P ( I i X )
N

i =1 (14)

From equations (13) and (14) and Bayes' theorem we have

Õ P ( X Ii ) Õ P ( Ii )
N N

P ( X I1 I 2  I N ) = i =1 i =1

éë P ( X ) ùû P ( I1 I 2  I N )
N -1

(15)

where both P ( X I1I 2  I N ) and Õ P ( Ii ) are independent of X and can be considered as

N

normalization factors, which can be disregarded in finding the maximum a posteriori estimate X̂ ( I ) .
Therefore, equation (15) can be changed to

Õ P ( X Ii )
N

Xˆ opt ( I ) = max P ( X I1 I 2  I N ) = max i -1

éë P ( X )ùû
ˆ ˆ N -1
X X
(16)

Where P(X | Ii) is the a posteriori estimate of the state after getting the sensor measurements. At this
point, the multi-sensor information fusion problem is converted into the problem of how to get the
state a posteriori probability, find the corresponding maximum a posteriori estimate, and derive the
need to build an innovative network social governance system through cross-regional cooperation by
the maximum a posteriori estimate.

2.3 Load identification process

The specific steps of the system simulation are as follows: firstly, a multi-degree-of-freedom model
is established according to the given values of m, k and c. The displacement response calculated by
the method of impulse response function convolution is used as the measured response, and the green
function matrix between the load action point and the response measurement point is established by
the system parameters, and then the external load is solved by using Bayes method and Tikhonov
regularization method respectively. The flow chart of the method is shown in Figure 2.
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

System Enter the load

parameters data

Convolution calculates the

system displacement response
and adds noise

Build a load identification model

using system kernel functions

L curve + T i khonov GCV+T i khonov Bayesian

regularization method regularization method regularization method

Identify loads

Figure 2. Flow of load recognition in physical space of a multi-degree-of-freedom system

The following will be divided into three aspects from the recognition, repeatability and performance
of the detection system. The system is in zero initial state, i.e., the displacement and velocity of the
system at zero moment are zero, the simulation time step is 0.001s, and the total time is 0.5s.

3 System simulation study

3.1 Identification of the detection system

In the four-degree-of-freedom system shown in Figure 3, the amplitude of the action on the mass m
is 100N, and its load time course is F=100*sin(50*t), the response on the first degree of freedom is
measured, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the system response is set to 40dB and 30dB to correspond
to the noise environment of lower noise and medium noise, respectively, to observe the recognition
effect under different noise conditions. The recognition results of the Tikhonov regularized sums are
shown in Figure 3(a) and Figure 3(b) when the signal-to-noise ratios of the responses are 40dB and
30dB.

150
Real load Tikhonov+L curve Tikhonov+GCV

100

50
Force /N

-50

-100

-150
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
Time /s

(a) Identification results of sinusoidal loads in physical space at 40d B for a four-degree-of-freedom system
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

150
Real load Bayesian regularization

100

50

Force/N
0

-50

-100

-150
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
Time/s

(b) Identification results of sinusoidal load in physical space at 30d B for the four-degree-of-freedom system

Figure 3. Identification results of sinusoidal load in physical space for the four-degree-of-freedom system

From Figure 3(a) and (b), it can be seen that the recognition effect is the best for Bayesian
regularization of sinusoidal load under two noise conditions, and the recognition effect of Tikhonov
method is the second best. The Tikhonov curve method has the worst recognition effect at low noise,
and the recognition effect is better at higher noise. The load recognized by Tikhonov regularization
method fluctuates more around the real load and the smoothness is poor, which affects the effect of
load recognition. The load curve identified by Bayesian regularization method is smooth, with little
fluctuation, and is basically identical to the real load at low noise.

The correlation coefficient r and the relative error RE of the identified loads are compared in Table
1. The regularization parameters selected by the two regularization parameter methods are listed in
Table 2.

Table 1. Comparison of sinusoidal load identification effects in physical space of four-degree-of-freedom

system
Tikhonov+L curve Tikhonov+G CV Bayesian regularization
SNR
r RE r RE r RE
40 86.83% 19.85% 92.10% 11.76% 96.84% 6.33%
30 83.44% 21.88% 86.30% 15.33% 96.77% 10.46%

Table 2. Comparison of regularization parameters for sinusoidal load identification in physical space of
four-degree-of-freedom system
SNR 40 30
Bayesian regularization 2.87E-06 5.14E-06
L curve 1.44E-06 3.00E-06
GCV 2.07E-06 3.50E-06

From comparing the regularization parameters of the two methods in Table 1, Table 2, it can be seen
that the regularization parameters chosen for the L-curve method and the GCV method are smaller
than those of the Bayesian method. This is in line with the difference in load identification results,
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

where the Bayesian regularization method has a better suppression effect on the noise in the response
and identifies a smooth load curve, while the Tikhonov curve and the Tikhonov method have a poorer
suppression effect on the noise, indicating that the regularization parameters chosen by both the L-
curve method and the GCV method are on the small side. The experiments show that it is shown that
the algorithms can be used to construct a diversified and innovative network social governance system
across regional cooperation.

3.2 Repeatability of the detection system

At the temperature of room temperature, air humidity of 17% RH and gas flow rate of 80 ml/min.
The NO end and NC end of the three-way solenoid valve are each connected to a gas bag, and the gas
bag connected to the NO end is filled with 99.99% nitrogen and the gas bag connected to the NC end
is filled with NH3 at a concentration of 30 ppm. NH3, and after 80 seconds of feeding the sample,
the NC end was closed and the NO end was opened to pass nitrogen, and the experiment was repeated
twice while all conditions were kept constant.

2.5

2.0
Amplitude (V)

1.5

1.0 MS1100
QS01
PID
H2S
0.5

0.0
200 400 600 800 1000
Sampling points

Figure 4. Experimental curve of system repeatability

From the experimental curve Figure 4, it can be seen that except for the 4NE/H2S sensor which does
not respond obviously, the other three sensors all responded to NH3, and the response curve remained
basically the same after three injections, which shows that the detection system has a good
repeatability. The experimental results after three injections are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Repeatable experimental data results (unit: V, Δ=Vmax-Vmin)

First injection Second injection Third injection
Number of sensor injections
Vmax Vmin Δ Vmax Vmin Δ Vmax Vmin Δ
MS1100 2.344 1.801 0.433 2.358 1.965 0.432 2.318 1.856 0.489
QS01 1.765 1.156 0.489 1.688 1.377 0.487 1.741 1.384 0.674
PID 0.156 0.087 0.145 0.165 0.054 0.109 0.185 0.084 0.108
4NE/H2S 0.018 0.018 0 0.019 0.018 0.002 0.018 0.018 0

From the above experimental curve Figure 3 and the experimental data table 3, the experimental
results show that the maximum difference in the response of each sensor to the same gas with the
same concentration at a fixed flow rate does not exceed 0.02 V. This indicates that the detection
system has good repeatability in detecting the same sample gas. The above two experiments
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

demonstrate that the multi-sensor detection system is able to detect unknown gases stably and reliably,
and show that the algorithm evaluation model can be used to build a collaborative and innovative
network social governance system across regional cooperation.

3.3 Performance of the detection system

The experiment uses a small corpus downloaded on CNLP as test data, which has 1022 documents
in five categories: computer, art, education, politics, and sports. The tests were conducted on the data
mining tool WEKA, a tool software for performing data mining, which allows experiments on
classification, clustering, etc. It includes a variety of classifiers, Bayesian being one of them. We
programmed the new Bayesian classifier to be implemented under the same conditions and
environment, and compared it with the original classifier in terms of classification accuracy, recall
and f-measure through experiments. All data were converted from text format to feature matrix format
after data preprocessing, i.e., the raff format suitable for the WEKA system, where a record represents
a text. The corpus used in the experiments serves both as a training and a test set.

Figure 5. Relationship between parameter c and accuracy

From Figure 5, it can be seen that when the threshold c, which measures the relevance of feature
items, takes different values, it affects the effect of text classification. The smaller the value of c, the
more relevant feature items are derived when examining the relevance of features, so that the
efficiency of the algorithm is lower, and the smaller the value of c, it may lead to strong twisting
between feature items (i.e., feature items that are originally not highly relevant are considered to be
related to each other), resulting in a decrease in the classification effect. The best performance can be
seen in Figure 4 for c = 0.3, but considering the efficiency issue, c = 0.4, which has a better overall
effect, was used during the experiments.
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

Figure 6. Comparison of regularization parameters for half-sine impact load recognition in physical space of
four degree of freedom system

From Figure 6, it can be seen that the classification effect of Bayes algorithm for sports, political
category improved from about 60% to about 70%, which is a big improvement of about 10%, and the
classification effect of computer and art category improved less, only about 1%, while in education
category there is a certain degree of decline, about 1%, although the percentage of decline is not large,
but this may be due to the feature This may be caused by the strong twist between the items. In the
categories of sports, politics, and medicine, the number of relevant feature terms derived by
examining the relevance of feature terms is greater than that of the other categories, and it is
conceivable that this method of merging relevant feature terms is practical and feasible. This
experiment shows that Bayes' algorithm is useful for improving the performance of Bayesian text
classification system, and suggests that the algorithm model can be used to build an intelligent and
innovative online social governance system across regional cooperation.
The above experiments show that the Bayes algorithm can be better applied in the network
governance system in terms of recognition, repeatability and performance.

4 Conclusion

The construction of a comprehensive network governance system should be based on the source
governance of network platforms, and the general idea is to normalize, rule of law and systematize
network content governance. The basic model is the benign interaction between the government and
the platform, i.e., the government supervises the platform, the platform supervises the individual,
innovates the comprehensive network governance system, and optimizes the ecological environment
of cyberspace. This paper proposes a reliability algorithm evaluation model based on a multi-stage
experimental data fusion data method. The simulation results from the judgment data, calculation
formula and posteriori estimates show that when the threshold c=0.4, the model is simple and easy to
implement, and the realization idea is consistent with the gradual process of people's knowledge of
unknown parameters from nothing to something, from less to more. And the experimental data is a
gradual refinement process in each stage, which helps to build a diversified, collaborative and
intelligent innovative network social governance system. Thus, it can be seen that data fusion
technology has good application prospects and promotion value in the future, with far-reaching
significance.
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

Funding

1. National Natural Science Foundation of China: Research on multi agent collaborative development
mechanism of cross regional cooperative innovation network from the perspective of Public
Governance (72164002)

2. National Natural Science Foundation of China: Research on the Interactive Evolution Mechanism
of Enterprise Network Dynamic Capability and Collaborative Innovation Ecosystem - Taking
Emerging Technology Industry as an Example (71762003)

References

[1] Farmaki, Anna. (2015). Regional network governance and sustainable tourism. Tourism Geographies,
17(3), 385-407.
[2] Oedewald, Pia, Gotcheva, et al. (2015). Safety culture and subcontractor network governance in a
complex safety critical project. Reliability engineering & system safety.
[3] Danshyna, Y. (2020). Network Interaction Of The Subjects In The Governance Of The System Of
Administrative Services Provision.
[4] Aembe, Bwimana. (2017). Heath Sector Network Governance and State-building in South Kivu,
Democratic Republic of Congo. Health policy and planning.
[5] Heemskerk, E. M. (2015). Corporate Network Governance: Power, Ownership and Control in
Contemporary Global Capitalism - CORPNET.
[6] Oliveira, A. C., Dóra, P., Spohn, M., et al. (2016). From the dark net to the cloudy data - Cloud network
governance guidelines// 34th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC
2015).
[7] Jha, S. K., Gold, E. R., Dubé, L. (2021). Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual
Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems. Sustainability, 13.
[8] Etemadi, M., Kenis, P., Ashtarian, K., et al. (2020). Network Governance Theory as Basic Pattern for
Promoting Financial Support System of the Poor in Iranian Health System.
[9] Aalikhani, R., Aliahmadi, A. R., Rasouli, M. R. (2019). Behavioral Factors Influencing on Designing
Network Governance Model in Health Care Domain: A systematic literature review. Quarterly Journal of
Management Strategies in Health System, 4(1).
[10] Ryu, L. (2018). A Study on the Model and Effectiveness of Network Governance: Focusing on
Namyangju Social Service Delivery System.
[11] Zhao, N., Liu, Y., Wang, J. (2021). Network Governance and the Evolving Urban Regeneration
Policymaking in China: A Case Study of Insurgent Practices in Enninglu Redevelopment Project.
Sustainability, 13(4), 2280.
[12] Bauknecht, D., Andersen, A. D., Dunne, K. (2020). Challenges for electricity network governance in
Energy transitions: Insights from Norway. Working Papers on Innovation Studies.
[13] Røiseland, A. (2018). Network governance and policy change. Blackwell.
[14] Wegner, D., Verschoore, J. (2022). Network Governance in Action: Functions and Practices to Foster
Collaborative Environments. Administration & Society, 54(3), 479-499.
[15] Song, Y., Zhang, Q. (2019). Network Governance--Integration Perspective of the Governance.
[16] Banasik, P., Morawska, S. (2015). Governance network and networks governance in the justice system –
challenges (Zarzadzanie (wspolzarzadzanie) sieciowe i zarzadzanie sieciami w wymiarze
sprawiedliwosci–wyzwania). Research Reports, 1.
[17] Klck, C., Weiler, F. (2021). Donor Interactions in the Allocation of Adaptation Aid: A Network Analysis.
Earth System Governance.
[18] Kim, S., Shim, S. (2020). Governance Mechanism and Structural Power Fit: Evidence from an
Information System Development Project. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems.
[19] Khan, M., Roy, P., Matin, I., et al. (2021). An adaptive governance and health system response for the
COVID-19 emergency. World Development, 137, 105213.
[20] Ganawa, E. S., Elfaig, A. (2019). Land Tenure System and land Governance in Sudan// Network of
Excellence on Land Governance in North AFrica (NELGA).
 Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (aop) (aop)

[21] Mbzibain, A., Ongolo, S., Krott, M. (2019). Complementarity, rivalry and substitution in the governance
of forests: Learning from independent forest monitoring system in Cameroon. Forest Policy and
Economics, 109, 101981.
[22] Halvadia, N., Joshi, A., Patel, S. E. (2016). Governance System in Gujarat State. Adhyayan A Journal of
Management Sciences, 2(2).
[23] Shalannanda, W., Hakimi, R. (2016). IT Governance design for Hospital Management Information
System case study: X hospital// 2016 10th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems
Services and Applications (TSSA).
[24] Velenturf, A. (2016). Analysing the governance system for the promotion of industrial symbiosis in the
Humber region, UK. People Place and Policy Online, 10(2), 146-173.
[25] Tibben, W., Brown, R., Beydoun, G., et al. (2016). Is consensus a viable concept to justify use of online
collaborative networks in multi-stakeholder governance?// Hawaii International Conference on System
Sciences.
[26] Miao, G. H., Xie, X. N., University C J. (2015). Path of Network Space Governance Under Rule of
Law:Constructing the Internet,Using the Internet,Managing the Internet by Law. Journal of Chongqing
University of Technology(Social Science).
[27] Moretti, A. (2017). Network Governance.
[28] Lingchun, Y. E., Wang, Y. Z., Chaoxiang, L. I., et al. (2017). Logics for building an integrated network
governance system with holistic perspective. Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and
Telecommunications(Social Science).
[29] Yu-Dong, L. V., Polytechnic S. (2019). Analysis of the Function of Government Officials in the Network
Comprehensive Governance System. Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College.
[30] Ren, X. L. (2018). New Order in the Network Public Domain Constructed in the National Governance
System in the New Era. Journal of Yan'an University(Social Sciences Edition).