Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Optimization of Satellite Link Design
Optimization of Satellite Link Design
Abstract-The design of satellite communication system is a earth stations. If required, additional constrains may be
complex process requiring compromises between many factors imposed by the need to conserve RF bandwidth and to avoid
to achieve the best performance at an acceptable cost. In the
Present World GEO satellites carry the vast majority of the interference with other users. It is possible that sometimes,
world’s satellite traffic, therefore it becomes utmost for the all of this information is not available and thus the designer
link designer to design with a optimum utilization of space must estimate values and produce tables of system
segment as well as transponder downlink EIRP. We ( authors) performance , based on assumed scenarios. Moreover, it is
has performed the experiments by varying some of the entities usually impossible to design a complete satellite
which play a vital role in the link budget and observed the
complete physical changes affecting the overall link budget communication system at the first attempt. So, a trial design
profile. Using such results based upon our work, we must first be tried, and then refined, until a workable
performed a theoretical predictions on some of the major compromise is achieved [2]. The authors has made all
problems experienced by the satellite users which includes attempts to describe here all the parameters, which are
losses, and attenuation by rain or by equipments, outage of the required for the calculation of Link budget of a particular
system etc. Results of these theoretical predictions, acted as an
impetus in knowing that the mismanagement of the link budget satellite.
calculation lead to vital problems such as interference, cross II. SATELLITE INFORMATION
polarization of the antenna and rising of the noise floor of
transponder etc. Following are the some important Satellite Informations:
148
for QPSK, m is 22, Nb = log222 , two bits per symbol achieve 99.99% because the rain attenuation generally
are required. exceeds 10 dB to 20 dB.
for 8 PSK, m is 23, Nb = log223 , three bits per IV. TRANS STATION DETAILS
symbol are required.
E. Transmission Rate (Hz) A. Trans Antenna Efficiency (%)
Transmission rate = carrier information rate/FEC. Trans Antenna Efficiency = Normally 60% efficiency is
good and it can achieve upto 70% in Satellite
F. Noise Bandwidth Factor (NBF) Communication.
NBF = (1+α), α is the role off factor of Band pass filter.
A filter with a transfer function equal to the square root of B. Trans Gain of Antenna (dB)
a raised cosine function is called square root raised cosine Trans Gain of Antenna = 20.4 + 10log10 η + 20log10 (D ×
filter or root raised cosine (RRC filters) even in practical no F/1000), η is efficiency of antenna (Trans) e.g. if the η is
such filter actually exists. Filters are used which are nearly 60% than 60/100 i.e. 0.6 should be taken for the calculation
equal to RRC. At transmitter Bandwidth (occupied) = purpose, D is the diameter of antenna in meters, F is the
Rb(1+α) Hz where α is > 0. Therefore occupied bandwidth uplink frequency in MHz (Mega Hertz).
is always more than bit rate. But at receiver the noise C. Trans Antenna Pointing Loss (dB)
bandwidth of RRC filters = data rate. Trans antenna pointing loss = If the antenna is not fully
G. Noise Bandwidth (NBW) (Hz) peak or due to some misalignment in the antenna sub system
NBW = NBF × data rate / FEC × number of bits per there may be some pointing error in transmitting the main
symbol. beam towards satellite.
149
C. Downlink Path Loss (dB)
This is the loss which electro-magnetic waves suffer
while propagating from the satellite to the earth station in
the atmosphere.
Downlink path loss = 92.5 + 20log10 (36000 km) +
20log10 (F/1000), F is the downlink frequency in MHz., the
distance of GEO stationary orbit from the earth is 36000 km.
(approx.).
The downlink path loss is always less than uplink path
loss as the uplink frequency is greater than the downlink
frequency.
D. Atmospheric Attenuation (dB)
The atmospheric and Ionospheric propagation are subject
to absorption, diffraction (diffusion), refraction, rotation of
the polarization plan of the electromagnetic wave.
The low layer of atmosphere cause absorption and
diffraction [8]. These cause some kind of emission and so an
Figure – 2 : Radiation increase in the noise power at the receiving antenna is
created. The upper layer of the atmosphere causes refraction
E. Clear Sky Noise Temperature (0K) and depolarization is produced when the radio waves
Clear Sky Noise Temperature is the total of Noise traverse the ionosphere.
temperature due to pre LNA losses plus due to LNA plus
antenna noise temperature. VII. UPLINK ANALYSIS
F. Clear Sky G/T (dB / 0K) A. Trans EIRP of the Earth Station (dBW)
G/T = Gain of the receiving antenna divided by system EIRP is the effective isotropic radiated power is the
noise temperature or it is equal to gain of the antenna in transmitting power which would be required to be fed to an
receive side (dB) minus 10log10 T system. isotropic antenna to give the same result as the transmitter
It is also called the figure merit. While describing G/T it and the antenna under consideration.
is essential to mention the frequency and elevation angle EIRP of the trans antenna = power at the input of the
because G varies with the frequency and T system depends antenna (dBW) plus gain of the antenna (dBi).
on the clear sky noise temperature which increases as the
elevation angle is reduced below 100 [7]. At higher B. Power at Satellite Antenna (dBW)
frequencies the noise configuration of low noise RF Power at Satellite Antenna = Trans EIRP of the earth
amplifier is higher. station – uplink path loss.
VI. MISCELLANEOUS LOSSES C. Power Flux Density at Input of the Satellite Antenna
(dBW/M2)
A. Rain Attenuation (dB) Power Flux Density at Input of the Satellite Antenna =
There are two zones mainly mentioned for rain i.e. N zone Power at Satellite Antenna + Satellite Antenna receives gain
and K zone. N zone is the higher rain zone and K zone is / m2.
the less rain zone. For N zone the uplink rain attenuation is D. Input Back Off / Carrier (dB)
5.4 dB and downlink rain attenuation is 3.6 dB. For K zone Input Back Off / Carrier = Saturated Flux Density of
the uplink rain attenuation is 2.5 dB and downlink rain Satellite (SFD) – Power Flux Density (PFD) at Satellite
attenuation is 1.5 dB. Antenna.
The rain attenuation depends on frequency, rain fall rate,
diameter and distribution of rain drops. E. Uplink C/N0 (dB – Hz)
Attenuation (rain) = γr × L where γr is the specific rain Uplink C/N0 = Trans EIRP of Earth Station – Uplink path
attenuation in dB / Km and L is the effective path length. At loss + Satellite G/T + 228.6 (k) – Trans Antenna Pointing
6/4 GHz the rain attenuation effect is negligible, its effect in Loss. Where k is the Boltzmann constant = 1.37 × 10-23.
14/11 GHz (KU) is more. Joules/Kelvin = 10log10 1.37 × 10-23 = -228.6 dB J/K.
150
VIII. DOWNLINK ANALYSIS C. Total Power Output of the amplifier (Watts)
Power amplifier output per carrier × number of carriers.
A. Saturation EIRP (dBW) Trans amplifier to antenna losses are due to the wave
Saturation EIRP is the maximum EIRP which the guide fixed between power amplifier and antenna for
transponder supports for the downlink carriers to the earth the propagation of radio frequency. The suitable wave
station. guide are used to minimum their losses [10].
B. Output Back Off per Carrier (dB) D. Steps required for Optimum utilization
Output Back Off per carrier = Input Back off per carrier – The following table illustrates the steps required for
Input Back off of satellite + Output Back off of Satellite. Optimum Utilization.
C. Carrier Down EIRP (dBW) TABLE – I
STEPS FOR OPTIMUM UTILIZATION
Carrier Down ERIP = Saturation EIRP of transponder –
Output back off per carrier. This value of EIRP which the S Variabl Variation Effect Effect Effect Effect on
N e Factor on on on Satellite
satellite antenna will transmit towards earth station and will Noise Require Trans Down
be considered for downlink C/N0 [9]. B/W d C/N E/S EIRP
EIRP
D. Clear Sky G/T (dB/0K) 1. FEC Increase Less More More More
Decrease More Less Less Less
In downlink path the receiving end is earth station 2. No. of More Less More More More
antenna, so this G/T is of the earth station. Bits per
symbol
E. Degradation in G/T (dB) Less More Less Less Less
3. Noise Increase More Less Less Less
This degradation in G/T is considered mostly for KU Bandwi
band. For C Band its value is negligible. dth
factor
F. Downlink C/N0 (dB – Hz) Decrease Less More More More
4. Eb/No Increase No More More More
Downlink C/N0 = Carrier down EIRP – Downlink path effect
loss + G/T of the earth station – Degradation in G/T + 228.6 Decrease No Less Less Less
effect
(Boltzmann Constant) – Receive antenna pointing loss. 5. Bit Error Less No More More More
Rate effect
G. Downlink C/N (dB) (BER)
Downlink C/N = Downlink C/N0 – 10log Noise More No Less Less Less
effect
Bandwidth of the carrier (Hz).
H. Downlink Power Spectral Density (PSD) (dBW/Hz) Satellite link can be further improved by using high
Downlink PSD = Carrier Down EIRP – Satellite trans quality antennas with better gain and less pointing error and
antenna gain – 10log10 Noise Bandwidth. the band pass filters having role of factor almost equal to
IX. TOTAL LINK ANALYSIS zero, so that the occupied bandwidth may be equal to data
rate. The pre LNA losses and losses between trans amplifier
A. Composite or Total C/N (dB) and antenna can be reduced by using high quality wave
(C/N)-1comp. = (C/N)-1uplink + (C/N)-1downlink + guide.
(C/N)-1intermodulation. XI. CONCLUSION
All the values of C/N are to be converted in Watts (dB to
Watts) than the values are put in the above formula after The above calculations and explanation of the link budget
complete calculation the value of the composite C/N. After should enable the readers and the satellite users to design
final calculation the value of composite C/N is again satellite links for prescribed quality & availability of
converted into dB (Watts to dB). services and to the dimensions of the earth station in terms
of antenna sizes, transmitted power, receiver noise
B. Link Margin (dB) performance etc. The specification of system will always
Link Margin = Composite C/N – required C/N. require a minimum C/N in the receiver, below which the
The purpose of link margin is to compensate any unseen link is considered inoperable. The design of the link to
losses which were not considered in the link budget so that achieve that minimum C/N requires repeated application of
there is no degradation in the link. the link and noise power equations to give C/N for clear air
X. TRANS EARTH STATION POWER AMPLIFIER SIZING conditions with acceptable bandwidth and antenna
dimensions.
A. Power at Trans Antenna Input (dB) There are too many variables in the system, including the
Trans EIRP (dBW)– Trans Antenna Gain (dBi). cost of antennas, receivers, and other components, to
produce a single optimization procedure. Iterative
B. Power Amplifier Output/Carrier (Watts) techniques are to be used to find a set of parameters for the
Power at Trans Antenna Input + Losses between trans earth station and satellite that provide the performance
amplifier to antenna required from the satellite communication system. The
dBm – 30 = dBW designers of a satellite communication system have to go
through several trial design procedures and compare the
151
resulting systems to determine which one best suits the
particular application.
REFERENCES
[1] J. Wang, L. Li , M. Zhou, “Topological Dynamics
Characterization for LEO Satellite Networks, Computer
Networks”: The International Journal of Computer and
Telecommunications Networking, Vol.51 No.1, pp-43-53, 17
January 2007
[2] Futron Corporation “How Many Satellites Are Enough? A
Forecast of Demand for Satellites, 2004–2012” February 16,
2004.
[3] R. Smallcomb, “A Unique Satellite Peer-to-Peer Enabling
Technology; Hughes Network Systems”; Hughes Spaceway,
The O’Reilly Peer-to-Peer and Web Services Conference,
Washington, D.C.— Nov. 5-8, 2001.
[4] J. Anderson, “Broadband Channel Simulator for Robust
Satellite Link Designs” RF Designs, April 1, 2004.
[5] A. Nandra, Jivesh Govil, Jivika Govil, “Causes of
Degradation of C/N and its Mitigation in Satcom”, Accepted
for IEEE Sixth International Conferences on Information,
Communications and Signal Processing, (ICICS 07), 10-13
Dec. 2007, Singapore.
[6] N.C. Karmakar, M.E. Bialkowski, “Designing an L-band
phased Array Antenna for Mobile Satellite Communications”,
Microwave Conference Proceedings, APMC, Apos; 97, Asia
Pacific Vol. 3, pp-949-952., Dec. 1997.
[7] P. Gvozdjak. “Modeling Communications in Low Earth Orbit
Satellite Networks”,. Ph.D Thesis, School of Computing
Science, Simon Fraser University, 2005.
[8] A. Ferreira, J. Galtier, J.-N. Petit and H. Rivano, “Re-routing
Algorithms in a Meshed Satellite Constellation”, Annales des
Tlcommunications, 56: 169-174, 2001.
[9] Jivesh Govil, Satellite Earth Stations for Distant Online
Learning, International Journal of Instructional Technology
and Distance Learning (USA), Vol. 2, No.10, pp. 75-84, Oct.
2005
[10] P. Crescenzi , G. Gambosi , P. Penna, “On-line Algorithms
for the Channel Assignment Problem in Cellular Networks”,
Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol.137 No.3, pp-237-266, 15
March 2004
152