Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SAMPLE PREPARATION:
Soil samples were air-dried at room temperature and sieved through 2-mm sized sieve to remove
coarse particles, stones, and debris. Soil samples were analyzed for particle size, i.e., sand, silt,
and clay, and soil textural classes were determined by using the textural triangle. OM was
determined by Tyurin’s method. The soil pH, EC, and TDS were determined in soil solution in a
ratio of 1:10 using Milwaukee SM802 Smart combined meter with a glass electrode.
Soil acid digests were prepared using CEM 630W closed vessel microwave digestion system
(USEPA 1998: Method 3051A) for the determination of elemental concentration Each soil
sample was weighed (0.5 gm) and placed in a prewashed Teflon vessel, and the soil samples
were digested in 9 ± 0.1 ml concentrated nitric acid and 3 ± 0.1 ml concentrated hydrochloric
acid. The microwave unit was calibrated to power and temperature. Ramping of temperature was
adjusted to 220 ± 5◦C, and a power of 1,200W was provided (USEPA 1998:Method 3051A).
After cooling, the contents of the vessel were filtered with Whatman filter paper no.42 and
diluted to volume of 50 ml. Metal concentrations of the major elements: Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe, and
trace metals: Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn in the solutions were measured using atomic absorption
spectrometer (Varian FSS-240). For quality control, reagent blanks, standard samples, and
replicate samples were simultaneously performed to assess contamination and precision in the
samples. Standard reference materials NISTSRM- 2709 (1992) and BCR-CRM-142R (1989)
were used for quality control procedures of major (Ca, Mg, Na, K, and Fe) and minor soil metals
(Cd, Cu, Co, Ni, Pb, and Zn). The recovery rates for most of the major elements were between
90% and 128% and for heavy metals in the international standard, reference material was
between 75% and 135%.
ANALYSIS:
Analytical results were compiled to form a multielement database using EXCEL and
STATISTICA prior to multivariate analysis. Descriptive statistics such as mean, standard error,
minimum, maximum, standard deviation, and variance were carried out Spatial variation
between land cover types based on metal properties was explained using discriminant function
analysis (DFA) to discriminate factors which bring variations amongst three land cover types.
Metal chemical parameters were considered as dependent variables while land cover types
constituted independent variables.
Principal component analysis based on factor analysis was applied for source identification of
metals input in urban soils. Raw dataset of three land cover types was dealt separately to evaluate
pattern of relationship between the soil parameters and to illustrate the factors that influence each
other. Factor loadings with a VARIMAX rotation were used. Input data matrices included
variables vs sites (11 × 173), (11 × 354), and (11 × 307) for drain side, green area, and built-up
area, respectively. Heavy metal concentrations were used as the input data to predict distribution
of metals in urban soils. Spatial interpolation technique such as kriging was used which utilizes
the coregionalization structure of soil properties and provide unbiased estimates and minimum
variance underlying the kriging model. Metal concentrations showed normal distribution except
acid extractable Pb content which showed skewed distribution and was log-transformed prior to
statistical analysis and kriging.
Enrichment Factor (EF) was calculated for individual elements in soils of each of the quadrat of
three land use types to assess most likely source of contamination after using,
“where, EFM is the enrichment factor of metal, (Cx/CFe)sample is the ratio of the concentration
of a test element to that of Fe at each sampling site, and (Cx/CFe)ref is the same ratio of the
concentration with respect to a reference soil”
Shale values of Turekian and Wedepohl (1961) in the earth’s crust were used as a reference soil.
Aluminum is frequently used as a reference element assuming the ease of determination of this
element. Al was substituted by Fe and used as reference element in this study. The focus was on
the comparison between the concentrations obtained and the concentrations of the elements in
the earth crust because soil is a part of the surface layer of the Earth’s crust, and its chemical
composition is related to one of the crusts. Due to the considerable influence of anthropogenic
transformations, soil contamination in three land use types was also evaluated using the
percentage enrichment factor, using
“Where, C is the mean total concentration in the soil, Cmin is the minimum concentration
determined during the study period, Cmax is the maximum concentration determined during the
study period.”
EF can give an insight into differentiating an anthropogenic source from a natural origin. Five
contamination categories are recognized on the basis of the enrichment factor, where EF < 2 is
deficiency to minimal enrichment; EF 2–5 is moderate enrichment; EF 5–20 is significant
enrichment; EF 20–40 is very high enrichment, and EF > 40 is extremely high enrichment.
Basically, as the EF value increases, the contribution from non-crustal sources also increases. A
quantitative measure of the degree of pollution was also developed in late 1970s and has been
widely used in heavy metal studies. The Index of geo-accumulation was calculated by using
“Where, Cn is the concentration of a given element in the soil tested, while Bn is the
concentration of the element in the crust” The constant 1.5 factor is used due to possible
variations in baseline data attributable to lithogenic effects Descriptive classification for the
index of geoaccumulation given by Frostner et al. (1990) is used:<0 = practically unpolluted; 0–1
= unpolluted to moderately polluted; 1–2 = moderately polluted; 2–3 = moderate to strongly
polluted; 3–4 = strongly polluted; 4–5 = strongly to very strongly polluted and >5 = very
strongly polluted. The overall metal contents of soils of each of the quadrat at three land use
types in this study was compared using the MPI using
METHOD VALIDATION
urban soils of the current study can be attributed to increased urban activities related to land
clearing, road construction, and formation of housing schemes. EF% of these metals indicated
extreme contamination of surface soils. Ni concentration is due to industrial and vehicular
emissions, and its lower EF in the urban surface soils leads to the assumption that Ni originated
partly from the parent material. Higher EF values of Pb (13) and Zn (21) in built-up area, while
Cd (15.01) soils samples from drain side were recorded, highlighting serious soil contamination
due to specific pollution sources. Higher EF values for Pb and Zn in the built-up area can be
attributed to the vehicular emissions, manufacturing of goods and their use in industrial activities
in the city. Zn distribution in all three land use types indicated its common origin mainly from
vehicular emissions. The minimum EF values, i.e., <5, implied moderate soil enrichment, and the
maximum EF values pointed to significant enrichment with Pb and Cd while for Zn, very high
enrichment values were found in three land use types of the city. Higher concentration of Cd was
found in southwestern part of the in-surface soils of other cities such as Beijing, Oklahoma,
Xuzhou city which is mostly undergoing different construction and developmental activities. Cd
emissions arise from the manufacture, use, and disposal of products utilizing Cd such as Cd
batteries, Cd pigmented plastics, ceramics, glasses, paints, and enamels, most of which are
extensively used in constructions. Presence of Cd in soil can also be related to sewage sludge
application Industrial area on the southwestern part of the city showed high levels of Co and Zn
concentrations especially in sectors I-9, I-10, and I-11. Co is a naturally occurring earth element
present as trace element in soils. The toxicity of Co in soil is generally very low as compared to
other metals. It usually occurs in association with other elements such as Ni. Co and Ni showed
similar trend. In soils, Ni is usually present in the organically bound form, which increases its
bioavailability and mobility Fe concentrations were high mainly in green and built-up areas
pointing towards its natural source. The soils in built-up areas are less polluted by heavy metals.
Along roadsides and drain sides, soils are heavily contaminated explaining a strong effect of
urbanization processes and anthropogenic activities.
DOCUMENTATION
The results will provide a base for future management practices. Soil contamination,
rearrangement of traffic flow should be a part of future plan. Measures should be taken to avoid
further clearing of land in order to avoid further contamination of soils in the city which is
evolving rapidly into a megacity.