DNV OFFSHORE CODES

AMENDMENTS AND CORRECTIONS

DECEMBER 2008

DET NORSKE VERITAS

FOREWORD
DET NORSKE VERITAS (DNV) is an autonomous and independent foundation with the objectives of safeguarding life, prop-
erty and the environment, at sea and onshore. DNV undertakes classification, certification, and other verification and consultancy
services relating to quality of ships, offshore units and installations, and onshore industries worldwide, and carries out research
in relation to these functions.
DNV Offshore Codes consist of a three level hierarchy of documents:
— Offshore Service Specifications. Provide principles and procedures of DNV classification, certification, verification and con-
sultancy services.
— Offshore Standards. Provide technical provisions and acceptance criteria for general use by the offshore industry as well as
the technical basis for DNV offshore services.
— Recommended Practices. Provide proven technology and sound engineering practice as well as guidance for the higher level
Offshore Service Specifications and Offshore Standards.
DNV Offshore Codes are offered within the following areas:
A) Qualification, Quality and Safety Methodology
B) Materials Technology
C) Structures
D) Systems
E) Special Facilities
F) Pipelines and Risers
G) Asset Operation
H) Marine Operations
J) Wind Turbines
O) Subsea Systems

Comments may be sent by e-mail to rules@dnv.com

For subscription orders or information about subscription terms, please use distribution@dnv.com
Comprehensive information about DNV services, research and publications can be found at http://www.dnv.com, or can be obtained from DNV,
Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Høvik, Norway; Tel +47 67 57 99 00, Fax +47 67 57 99 11.

© Det Norske Veritas. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
photocopying and recording, without the prior written consent of Det Norske Veritas.

Computer Typesetting (Adobe FrameMaker) by Det Norske Veritas.

Printed in Norway

If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of Det Norske Veritas, then Det Norske Veritas shall pay compensation to such person
for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compen-
sation shall never exceed USD 2 million.
In this provision "Det Norske Veritas" shall mean the Foundation Det Norske Veritas as well as all its subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees, agents and any other acting on behalf of Det
Norske Veritas.
 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
CONTENTS
Sec. 1 Current DNV Offshore Codes ............................. 5
Sec. 2 Offshore Class Related Documents
Published Electronically....................................... 8
Sec. 3 Amended Offshore Service Specifications.......... 9
DNV-OSS-305: Rules for Certification and Verification of
Diving Systems, January 2004........................................................... 9
DNV-OSS-308: Verification of Lifting Appliances for the
Oil and Gas Industry, June 2005........................................................ 9
DNV-OSS-309: Verification, Certification and classification of
gas Export and receiving terminals, January 2005 ............................ 9
DNV-OSS-401: Technology Qualification Management,
July 2006 .......................................................................................... 9
Sec. 4 Amended Offshore Standards ........................... 10
DNV-OS-C503: Concrete LNG Terminal Structures and
Containment Systems, October 2004............................................... 10
DNV-OS-E402: Offshore Standard for Diving System,
January 2004 .................................................................................... 10
DNV-OS-F101: Submarine Pipeline Systems, October 2007 ......... 10
DNV-OS-F201: Dynamic Risers, 2001 ........................................... 12
DNV-OS-J101: Design of Offshore Wind Turbine
Structures, October 2007 ................................................................. 13
DNV-OS-J102: Design and Manufacture of Wind Turbine Blades,
Offshore and Onshore Wind Turbines, October 2006 ..................... 13
Sec. 5 Amended Recommended Practices ................... 14
DNV-RP-B401: Cathodic Protection Design, January 2005.......... 14
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Contents – Page 3
DNV-RP-C103: Column-Stabilised Units, February 2005 ............. 15
DNV-RP-C201: Buckling Strength of Plated Structures,
October 2002 ................................................................................... 15
DNV-RP-C202: Buckling Strength of Shells, October 2002 .......... 17
DNV-RP-C203: Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures ........ 17
DNV-RP-C204: Design against Accidental Loads,
November 2004 ............................................................................... 18
DNV-RP-C205: Environmental Conditions and
Environmental Loads, April 2007 ................................................... 18
DNV-RP-C206: Fatigue Methodology of Offshore Ships,
October 2006 ................................................................................... 19
DNV-RP-C207: Statistical Representation of Soil Data,
April 2007........................................................................................ 19
DNV-RP-E402: Naval Rescue Submersibles, April 2004 .............. 19
DNV-RP-E403: Hyperbaric Evacuation Systems,
December 2006................................................................................ 19
DNV-RP-F101: Corroded Pipelines, October 2004 ........................ 19
DNV-RP-F102: Pipeline Field Joint Coating and Field Repair of
Linepipe Coating, October 2003...................................................... 20
DNV-RP-F103: Cathodic Protection of Submarine Pipelines by
Galvanic Anodes, October 2003...................................................... 20
DNV-RP-F106: Factory Applied External Pipeline Coatings for
Corrosion Control, October 2003 .................................................... 22
DNV-RP-F107: Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection,
March 2001 ...................................................................................... 23
DNV-RP-F109: On-Bottom Stability Design of
Submarine Pipelines, October 2007 ................................................ 23
DNV-RP-F111: Interference Between Trawl Gear and
Pipelines, October 2006................................................................... 24
DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 4 – Contents

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.1 – Page 5

SECTION 1
CURRENT DNV OFFSHORE CODES

Table 1 Current DNV Offshore Codes

Latest update
Date of
DNV Offshore Codes Printed version of Adobe PDF
amendment file
Offshore Service Specifications
DNV-OSS-101 Rules for Classification of Offshore Drilling and Support Units
DNV-OSS-102 Rules for Classification of Floating Production, Storage and
Loading Units
DNV-OSS-103 Rules for Classification of LNG/LPG Floating Production and Stor-
age Units or Installations Printed version not available.
Published electronically only, see Sec.2 Table 1
DNV-OSS-121 Classification based on Performance Criteria Determined from Risk
Assessment Methodology
DNV-OSS-201 Verification for Compliance with Norwegian Shelf Legislation
DNV-OSS-202 Verification for Compliance with UK Shelf Regulations
DNV-OSS-300 Risk Based Verification April 2004 – April 2004
DNV-OSS-301 Certification and Verification of Pipelines October 2000 – October 2000
DNV-OSS-302 Offshore Riser Systems October 2003 – October 2003
DNV-OSS-304 Risk Based Verification of Offshore Structures October 2006 – October 2006
DNV-OSS-305 Rules for Certification and Verification of Diving Systems January 2004 October 2007 October 2008
April 2008
October 2008
DNV-OSS-306 Verification of Subsea Facilities June 2004 – June 2004
DNV-OSS-307 Verification of Process Facilities June 2004 – June 2004
DNV-OSS-308 Verification of Lifting Appliances for the Oil and Gas Industry June 2005 October 2008 October 2008
DNV-OSS-309 Verification, Certification and Classification of Gas Export and Re- January 2005 April 2005 April 2005
ceiving Terminals
DNV-OSS-312 Certification of Tidal and Wave Energy Converters October 2008 – October 2008
DNV-OSS-401 Technology Qualification Management July 2006 April 2007 April 2007
Offshore Standards
DNV-OS-A101 Safety Principles and Arrangement
DNV-OS-B101 Metallic Materials
DNV-OS-C101 Design of Offshore Steel Structures, General (LRFD method)
DNV-OS-C102 Structural Design of Offshore Ships
DNV-OS-C103 Structural Design of Column Stabilised Units (LRFD method)
DNV-OS-C104 Structural Design of Self-elevating Units (LRFD method)
Printed version not available.
DNV-OS-C105 Structural Design of TLPs (LRFD method) Published electronically only, see Sec.2 Table 1
DNV-OS-C106 Structural Design of Deep Draught Floating Units/Spars (LRFD and
WSD Method)
DNV-OS-C107 Structural Design of Ship-shaped Drilling and Well Service Units
DNV-OS-C201 Structural Design of Offshore Units (WSD method)
DNV-OS-C301 Stability and Watertight Integrity
DNV-OS-C401 Fabrication and Testing of Offshore Structures
DNV-OS-C501 Composite Components January 2003 – January 2003
DNV-OS-C502 Offshore Concrete Structures April 2007 – April 2007
DNV-OS-C503 Concrete LNG Terminal Structures and Containment Systems October 2004 October 2004 October 2004
DNV-OS-D101 Marine and Machinery Systems and Equipment
DNV-OS-D201 Electrical Installations
DNV-OS-D202 Automation, Safety, and Telecommunication Systems
DNV-OS-D301 Fire Protection Printed version not available.
DNV-OS-E101 Drilling Plant Published electronically only, see Sec.2 Table 1
DNV-OS-E201 Oil and Gas Processing Systems
DNV-OS-E301 Position Mooring
DNV-OS-E302 Offshore Mooring Chain
DNV-OS-E303 Offshore Mooring Fibre Ropes October 2008 – October 2008
DNV-OS-E401 Helicopter Decks Printed version not available.
Published electronically only, see Sec.2 Table 1

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 6 – Sec.1

Table 1 Current DNV Offshore Codes

Latest update
Date of
DNV Offshore Codes (Continued) Printed version of Adobe PDF
amendment file
DNV-OS-E402 Offshore Standard for Diving Systems January 2004 April 2004 October 2008
October 2004
April 2007
October 2007
October 2008
DNV-OS-E403 Offshore Loading Buoys Printed version not available.
Published electronically only, see Sec.2 Table 1
DNV-OS-F101 Submarine Pipeline Systems October 2007 April 2008 October 2008
October 2008
DNV-OS-F201 Dynamic Risers 2001 October 2001, October 2003
October 2003
DNV-OS-J101 Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures October 2007 October 2007 December 2008
October 2008
December 2008
DNV-OS-J102 Design and Manufacture of Wind Turbine Blades, Offshore and October 2006 April 2007 April 2007
Onshore Wind Turbines
Recommended Practices
DNV-RP-A203 Qualification Procedures for New Technology September 2001 – September 2001
DNV-RP-B101 Corrosion Protection of Floating Production and Storage Units April 2007 – April 2007
DNV-RP-B401 Cathodic Protection Design January 2005 April 2005 April 2008
October 2005
April 2006
October 2006
October 2007
April 2008
DNV-RP-C101 Allowable Thickness Diminution for Hull Structure of Offshore April 2007 – April 2007
Ships
DNV-RP-C102 Structural Design of Offshore Ships February 2002 – February 2002
DNV-RP-C103 Column Stabilised Units February 2005 April 2008 April 2008
DNV-RP-C201 Buckling Strength of Plated Structure October 2002 April 2003 October 2008
April 2004
October 2004
October 2008
DNV-RP-C202 Buckling Strength of Shells October 2002 April 2005 April 2005
DNV-RP-C203 Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures April 2008 October 2008 October 2008
DNV-RP-C204 Design against Accidental Loads November 2004 April 2005 April 2005
DNV-RP-C205 Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads April 2007 October 2007 October 2008
April 2008
October 2008
DNV-RP-C206 Fatigue Methodology of Offshore Ships October 2006 April 2007 April 2007
DNV-RP-C207 Statistical Representation of Soil Data April 2007 October 2007 October 2007
DNV-RP-D101 Structural Analysis of Piping Systems October 2008 – October 2008
DNV-RP-D201 Integrated Software Dependent Systems October 2008 – October 2008
DNV-RP-E101 Recertification of Well Control Equipment October 2008 – October 2008
DNV-RP-E301 Design and Installation of Fluke Anchors in Clay 2000 – 2000
DNV-RP-E302 Design and Installation of Drag-in Plate Anchors in Clay December 2002 – December 2002
DNV-RP-E303 Geotechnical Design and Installation of Suction Anchors in Clay October 2005 – October 2005
DNV-RP-E304 Damage Assessment of Fibre Ropes for Offshore Mooring April 2005 – April 2005
DNV-RP-E401 Survey of Diving Systems – – April 2007
DNV-RP-E402 Naval Rescue Submersibles – October 2008 October 2008
DNV-RP-E403 Hyperbaric Evacuation Systems – April 2007 October 2008
October 2008
DNV-RP-F101 Corroded Pipelines October 2004 October 2006 October 2006
DNV-RP-F102 Pipeline Field Joint Coating and Field Repair of Linepipe Coating October 2003 October 2003 April 2006
April 2004
October 2005
April 2006
DNV-RP-F103 Cathodic Protection of Submarine Pipelines by Galvanic Anodes October 2003 April 2004 April 2008
October 2005
April 2006
October 2007
April 2008
DNV-RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines February 2006 – February 2006

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.1 – Page 7

Table 1 Current DNV Offshore Codes

Latest update
Date of
DNV Offshore Codes (Continued) Printed version of Adobe PDF
amendment file
DNV-RP-F106 Factory Applied External Pipeline Coatings for Corrosion Control October 2003 April 2004 April 2006
October 2005
April 2006
DNV-RP-F107 Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection March 2001 October 2002 October 2002
DNV-RP-F108 Fracture Control for Pipeline Installation Methods Introducing January 2006 – January 2006
Cyclic Plastic Strain
DNV-RP-F109 On-Bottom Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines October 2007 October 2008 October 2008
DNV-RP-F110 Global Buckling of Submarine Pipelines October 2007 – October 2007
Structural Design due to High Temperature/High Pressure
DNV-RP-F111 Interference Between Trawl Gear and Pipelines October 2006 April 2007 April 2007
DNV-RP-F112 Design of Duplex Stainless Steel Subsea Equipment Exposed to October 2008 – October 2008
Cathodic Protection
DNV-RP-F113 Pipeline Subsea Repair October 2007 – October 2007
DNV-RP-F201 Design of Titanium Risers October 2002 – October 2002
DNV-RP-F202 Composite Risers May 2003 – May 2003
DNV-RP-F204 Riser Fatigue July 2005 – July 2005
DNV-RP-F205 Global Performance Analysis of Deepwater Floating Structures October 2004 – October 2004
DNV-RP-F206 Riser Integrity Management April 2008 – April 2008
DNV-RP-F301 Subsea Separator Structural Design April 2007 – April 2007
DNV-RP-G101 Risk Based Inspection of Offshore Topside Static Mechanical January 2002 – January 2002
Equipment
DNV-RP-G103 Non-intrusive Inspection – – October 2007
DNV-RP-H101 Risk Management in Marine and Subsea Operations January 2003 – January 2003
DNV-RP-H102 Marine operations during Removal of Offshore Installations April 2004 – April 2004
DNV-RP-O401 Safety and Reliability of Subsea Systems April 1985 – April 1985
DNV-RP-O501 Erosive Wear in Piping Systems 2005 – 2005

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 8 – Sec.2

SECTION 2
OFFSHORE CLASS RELATED DOCUMENTS
PUBLISHED ELECTRONICALLY

New update scheme

Since they are fully electronic and not printed, the class related
documents shown in Table 1 follow a different update scheme
than the other offshore documents (shown in Sec.1 Table 1):
1) Whenever revised, or undergoing significant editorial
changes, a class related document will be given a new edi-
tion date and the main changes will be described on Page
3 of that document. The corresponding Adobe PDF file
will be made available form the Webshop and the date of
the “Current edition” column of Table 1 will be updated.
2) If, at a later date, the need arises for insignificant editorial
corrections to the document, the electronic file will be up-
dated, but the edition date will be retained. However, a
new Adobe PDF file will be generated and made available
from the Webshop. The date of the PDF file will appear in
the right most column of Table 1.
3) The next time the document is subject to revision or signif-
icant editorial changes, step 1) is repeated. In addition, the
date(s) in right most column will be deleted.
When step 2) is relevant, no description of the related insignif-
icant editorial corrections is deemed necessary and is omitted
from Sec.3 and 4. If, for some reason, such corrections are of
interest, these may be provided on request.
In order to ensure a practical transition from the “print” scheme
to the “electronic” scheme, all documents in Table 1 have been
given the edition date “October 2008” and no date is shown in
the right most column.

Table 1 Offshore class related documents only published electronically (not printed)
Editorial
Previous Current corrections,
DNV Offshore Documents edition edition 1) Adobe PDF file
updates 1) 2)
Offshore Service Specifications
DNV-OSS-101 Rules for Classification of Offshore Drilling and Support Units April 2007 October 2008 –
DNV-OSS-102 Rules for Classification of Floating Production, Storage and April 2007 October 2008 –
Loading Units
DNV-OSS-103 Rules for Classification of LNG/LPG Floating Production and May 2001 October 2008 –
Storage Units or Installations
DNV-OSS-121 Classification based on Performance Criteria Determined from May 2001 October 2008 –
Risk Assessment Methodology
DNV-OSS-201 Verification for Compliance with Norwegian Shelf Legislation October 2007 October 2008 –
DNV-OSS-202 Verification for Compliance with UK Shelf Regulations March 2001 October 2008 –
Offshore Standards
DNV-OS-A101 Safety Principles and Arrangement October 2005 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-B101 Metallic Materials January 2001 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-C101 Design of Offshore Steel Structures, General (LRFD method) April 2004 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-C102 Structural Design of Offshore Ships April 2004 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-C103 Structural Design of Column Stabilised Units (LRFD method) April 2004 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-C104 Structural Design of Self-elevating Units (LRFD method) October 2004 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-C105 Structural Design of TLPs (LRFD method) October 2005 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-C106 Structural Design of Deep Draught Floating Units/Spars (LRFD January 2001 October 2008 –
and WSD Method)
DNV-OS-C107 Structural Design of Ship-shaped Drilling and Well Service April 2008 October 2008 –
Units
DNV-OS-C201 Structural Design of Offshore Units (WSD method) April 2005 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-C301 Stability and Watertight Integrity January 2001 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-C401 Fabrication and Testing of Offshore Structures April 2004 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-D101 Marine and Machinery Systems and Equipment October 2005 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-D201 Electrical Installations January 2008 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-D202 Automation, Safety, and Telecommunication Systems April 2008 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-D301 Fire Protection October 2005 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-E101 Drilling Plant October 2006 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-E201 Oil and Gas Processing Systems October 2005 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-E301 Position Mooring October 2004 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-E302 Offshore Mooring Chain – October 2008 –
DNV-OS-E401 Helicopter Decks March 2001 October 2008 –
DNV-OS-E403 Offshore Loading Buoys April 2005 October 2008 –
1) The latest PDF file updates are available for download from http://webshop.dnv.com/global/.
2) All editorial corrections have been incorporated (no description of these corrections is found in Sec.3 or 4).

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.3 – Page 9

SECTION 3
AMENDED OFFSHORE SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS
Note: Changes to class related documents (documents published electronically only) are not included. See Sec.2.

DNV-OSS-305: Rules for Certification and Verification of DNV-OSS-309: Verification, Certification and classifica-
Diving Systems, January 2004 tion of gas Export and receiving terminals, January 2005

Changes Published October 2008 Changes Published October 2007

General
Sec.4 Page 17
“DNV Rules for Certification of Lifting Appliances” has been
replaced by the “DNV Standard for Certification No. 2.22 Lift- In Table C2, the row covering DNV-RP-A202 has been deleted
ing Appliances” and the references have been changed accord- and the row covering DNV-RP-A201 has been changed to:
ingly.
Guideline No. 17 Plan Approval Documentation Types –
Changes Published April 2008 Definitions

Sec.2 Page 12
Item C701 has been amended and now reads: Changes Published April 2005
701 DNV Classification is described in Sec.2 G of this OSS,
in DNV-OSS-101 "Rules for Classification of Offshore Drill- Sec.2 Page 9
ing and Support Units" and in DNV Rules for Ships. In item A102, under “Statutory Certification”, the reference to
Sec.2 C300 has been corrected to Sec.4 A300.
Changes Published October 2007
Sec.4 Page 15
Sec.1 Page 9 In item B601, the numbering of “Table A3” has been correct-
Due to the withdrawal of DNV-RP-A201 (replaced by Guide- ed to “Table B3”.
line No. 17), item C300 has been amended as follows:
C 300 DNV Guidelines
301 The latest revision of the following documents apply: DNV-OSS-401: Technology Qualification Management,
July 2006
Table C3 DNV Guidelines
Reference Title Changes Published April 2007
Guideline No. 17 Plan Approval Documentation Types –
Definitions Sec.3 Page 11
In item A401, the text “product pertification” has been cor-
rected to “product certification”.
DNV-OSS-308: Verification of Lifting Appliances for the
Oil and Gas Industry, June 2005

Changes Published October 2008

App.B Page 13
“DNV Rules for Certification of Lifting Appliances” has been
replaced by the “DNV Standard for Certification No. 2.22 Lift-
ing Appliances” and the reference in item D401 has been
changed accordingly.

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 10 – Sec.4

SECTION 4
AMENDED OFFSHORE STANDARDS
Note: Changes to class related documents (documents published electronically only) are not included. See Sec.2.

In item B102, the formula for az has been corrected as follows:

DNV-OS-C503: Concrete LNG Terminal Structures and
Containment Systems, October 2004 ( 5 h 1 h s – 0.02 h 1 h s L 1 L + 1 ) ⋅ g
a z = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- {m/s 2 }
Changes Published October 2004 100

Sec.6 Page 26 Changes Published April 2004

The reference in item B602 is corrected to read: Appendix A Page 54
DNV-OS-C502 P500 Under sub-section element A200, add the following item:
App.D Page 52 202 Parameters applied for correction of units in empirical
The reference in item A402, list item b),ii), is corrected to read: formulae:
Sec.8 B h1 = 1 m -1
L1 = 1 m -1
u1 = 1 m/s
DNV-OS-E402: Offshore Standard for Diving System, u2 = 1m
January 2004

Changes Published October 2008 DNV-OS-F101: Submarine Pipeline Systems,

October 2007
General
“DNV Rules for Certification of Lifting Appliances” has been Changes Published October 2008
replaced by the “DNV Standard for Certification No. 2.22 Lift-
ing Appliances” and the references have been changed ac- Sec.1 Page 15
cordingly. In Sub-section B300, in the reference to DNV-RP-F112, the
text “Draft Issue April 2006” has been deleted.
Changes Published October 2007
Changes Published April 2008
Sec.1 Page 8
Due to the withdrawal of DNV-RP-A201 (replaced by Guide- General
line No. 17), item B300 has been amended as follows: The D/t application range has been changed to D/t2 through-
B 300 DNV Guidelines out the document.
301 The latest revision of the following documents apply: Sec.1 Page 15
In sub-section B600, the following reference has been added:
Table B3 DNV Guidelines
Reference Title ASTM A370 Standard Test Methods and Defini-
Guideline No. 17 Plan Approval Documentation Types – tions for Mechanical Testing of Steel
Definitions Products
Sec.1 Page 16
Changes Published April 2007
In sub-section B600, the following reference has been added:
Sec.4 Page 31
ISO 8501-1 Preparation of steel substrates before
Table D1 has been deleted and Item E301 has been amended application of paints and related prod-
as follows: ucts -- Visual assessment of surface
301 In addition to the requirements in E105 all penetrations cleanliness -- Part 1: Rust grades and
for lines designed for gas distribution (e.g. supply, exhaust and preparation grades of uncoated steel
equalisation) shall be fitted with non-return valves or flow fus- substrates and of steel substrates after
es as approriate for the direction of gas flow. Lines specifically overall removal of previous coatings
designed for non distribution purposes (e.g. analysis) shall be
Sec.1 Page 22
kept to the minimum diameter possible and limited to a maxi-
mum of 5 mm. In items C332 and C333, the reference to “303”, has been cor-
rected to “334”.
Changes Published October 2004 Sec.1 Page 23 and 24
In sub-section D100, the following abbreviations have been
Appendix A Page 54 added:
Previous item B103 “Motions of ship shaped support vessels”, MT Magnetic Particle Testing
has been renumbered 102. PT Penetrant Testing
Appendix A Page 55 VT Visual Testing

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.4 – Page 11

and the following abbreviation has been changed: Eq. 5.30 has been corrected to:

EC Eddy Current Testing

⎛ t ⎞ ⎛ p − pe ⎞
ε c (t , p min − p e ) = 0.78 ⋅ ⎜ − 0.01⎟ ⋅ ⎜⎜1 + 5.75 ⋅ min ⎟⎟ ⋅ α h −1.5 ⋅ α gw
Sec.5 Page 44 ⎝ D ⎠ ⎝ pb (t ) ⎠
The paragraph in Table 5-3, column 4, third row has been cor- (5.30)
rected and now reads:
Sec.5 Page 52
Special evaluation of accidental loads or other external loads In item E411, the last sentence: “The static analyses method
and excessive corrosion shall be included in the determination may be expressed by:” has been deleted.
of minimum required wall thickness
Sec.6 Page 61
In note 4) under Table 5-5, “U” has been corrected to “αU”.
In item D204, the reference to E205 has been corrected to 602.
Sec.5 Page 45 Sec.6 Page 62
In Table 5-6, the text “Supplementary requirement αU” has In item D402, the dash list has been changed to an alpha nu-
been corrected to “Supplementary requirement U”. meric list.
Sec.5 Page 47 In item D405, the reference to “E502 Guidance Note” has
been corrected to “502 Guidance Note”.
Equation 5.19a and b has been amended as follows:
In item D406, the reference to “E403 and E605-E606” has
2
been corrected to “403 and 605-606”.
⎧ M Sd ⎧⎪ γ m ⋅ γ SC ⋅ S Sd ( pi )⎫⎪ ⎫⎪ ⎛
2
pi − pe ⎞
2
Sec.6 Page 63
⎪
γ ⋅
⎨ m SCγ ⋅ + ⎨ ⎬ ⎬ + ⎜ α ⋅ ⎟ ≤1
α c ⋅ M p (t 2 ) ⎪⎩ α c ⋅ S p (t 2 ) ⎪⎭ ⎪ ⎜⎝ α c ⋅ pb (t 2 ) ⎟⎠
p
⎪⎩ In item D507, the reference to E505 and E506 has been cor-
⎭
rected to 505 and 506.
(5.19a) Sec.7 Page 67
In item A605, the text “SMYS 485 MPa” has been corrected to
2 “SMYS > 485 MPa”.
⎧⎪ M Sd ' (t2 ) ⎧ γ m ⋅ γ SC ⋅ S Sd ' ( pi , t2 ) ⎫ ⎫⎪ ⎛
2 2
pi − pe ⎞
⎨γ m ⋅ γ SC ⋅ +⎨ ⎬ ⎬ + ⎜⎜α p ⋅ ⎟⎟ ≤ 1 Sec.7 Page 68
⎪⎩ αc ⎩ αc ⎭ ⎪⎭ ⎝ α c ⋅ pb (t2 ) ⎠
In item B332, the definition of sr has been changed as follows:
(5.19b) sr = |Da - Db| / Db
Sec.7 Page 71
The following has been added below Eq. 5.19b:
In Table 7-5, the 2nd and 3rd bullet point under Note 4 has been
Applies for D/t2 ≤ 45, Pi > Pe merged.
In Table 7-5, 3rd (prev. 4th) bullet point under Note 4, the text,
Sec.5 Page 48 “strip test pieces” has been changed to “rectangular test pieces”.
Definition of “normalised effective force” (Under Eq. 5.21), Sec.7 Page 72
has been corrected to: In item B507, “heat” has been changed to “test unit” (Two
places).
SSd’ = SSd/Sp (normalised effective force)
Sec.7 Page 78
Definition of “qh” (Under Eq. 5.21), has been deleted. In item D303, the reference to A610 has been corrected to
A609.
Eq. 5.23 has been corrected to: The heading above item D405 has been corrected and now
reads:
⎧ pi − pe 2 General requirements to manufacture of clad linepipe
⎪ 1− β <
⎪ pb 3
αp = ⎨ (5.23) In item D416, the reference to B331 has been corrected to
⎛ ⎞
⎪1 − 3β ⎜1 − pi − pe ⎟ pi − pe 2
≥ B332.
⎪⎩ ⎜ pb ⎟⎠ pb 3
⎝ Sec.7 Page 84
In item H102, the reference: “see B200” has been changed to:
Eq. 5.24 has been corrected to: ref. B200, C200 and D200.
The reference to “Table 6-1” in Table 7-20, has been correct-
⎧ 0.5 for D / t 2 < 15 ed to “Table 7-1” (two places).
⎪⎪⎛ 60 − D / t 2 ⎞
β = ⎨⎜ ⎟ for 15 ≤ D / t 2 ≤ 60 (5.24) Sec.7 Page 85
⎪⎝ 90 ⎠ In item I112, the reference to “E700” has been corrected to
⎪⎩ 0 for D / t 2 > 60 “D700”.
In item I117, the following references have been added: “7-14
Eq. 5.29 has been corrected to: and 7-15”.
In item I118, the text “test unit” has been changed to “casting
ε c (t 2 , pmin − pe ) sequence”.
ε Sd ≤ ε Rd = D/t ≤ 45, pi ≥ pe (5.29) A new paragraph has been added to item I201as follows:
γε
Testing shall be according to Table 7-24.

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 12 – Sec.4

Sec.7 Page 87 App.B Page 157

In Table 7-25, Note 3 has been corrected and now reads: In item A604, definition of “e”, the reference to “Table 23”
has been corrected to “Table 23 of ISO 3183”.
3) Not more than 100 pipes with D < 508 mm and not more
than 50 pipes for D ≥ 508 mm. App.C Page 167
Sec.7 Page 88 In item C201, the text “Is” has been corrected to “Si”.
In Table 7-26, four references to “Note 2” have been added. In item C302, the reference to “D200” has been corrected to
“B700”.
Sec.8 Page 89
App.C Page 170
In item A201, the word “Subsection” has been changed to
“Section”. In item D807, the text “high and low input” has been changed
to “high and low heat input”.
In item A203, the reference to “Sec.6 B500” has been changed
to “Sec.6”. App.C Page 174
In item B102, the reference “B400 - B700” has been corrected In item E304, the reference to “Sec.6 D207” has been deleted.
to “B300 - B600”. In item E309, the reference to “E705” has been corrected
Sec.8 Page 90 to”D705”.
In item B312, the word “HOLD” has been deleted from the last App.C Page 177
paragraph.
In item F109, the extra “t” in front of the word “grinding” has
Sec.8 Page 91 been deleted.
In item B413, 6th list-item, “DP” has been corrected to “PT”. App.C Page 178
Sec.8 Page 95 In item F304, the word “HOLD” has been deleted.
In item D101, the reference to “B400 and B500” has been App.C Page 179
changed to “B300 and B400”.
In item F315, the reference to “Sec.5 E302” has been correct-
The list in item D104, has been reformatted to improve the ed to”Sec.6 B302”.
readability”.
App.C Page 180
Sec.8 Page 96
In item F501, “Ohm” has been added after 0.1.
In item E101, “lot” has been changed to “test unit”.
App.C Page 181
Sec.8 Page 97
In Table C-7, The column heading “CRA/Duplex SS” has been
In Table 8-4, the reference to “E109” has been corrected to changed to “CRA/Duplex SS 1)”.
“E108”, and the reference to “C200” has been corrected to
“C500”. App.C Page 183
Sec.13 Page 134 Item H101, third list item has been corrected and now reads:
Table 13-3 has been corrected for misprints and now reads: — the minimum time period of backing gas application after
welding.
Table 13-3 "Usage factors" η for pressure containment
Utilisation Safety Class Pressure App.C Page 184
factor,αU Low Medium High test
In item H116, “xx mm” has been changed to “25 mm”, and
1.00 0.847 3 0.802 0.698 1 0.96 the text “(solution annealing)” has been added after "post
(0.843) weld heat treatment".
0.96 0.8133 0.77 0.672 0.96
(0.838)
1) In location class 1, 0.802 may be used
2) In location class 1, 0.77 may be used
DNV-OS-F201: Dynamic Risers, 2001
3) Effectively this factor since the pressure test is governing
Changes Published October 2003
Sec.13 Page 135
Eq. 13.10 has been corrected as follows: Sec.4 Page 24
Replace item B501 as follows:
( pc (t ) − pel (t )) ⋅ ( pc (t ) 2
− p p (t )
2
) D
= p c (t ) ⋅ p el (t ) ⋅ p p (t ) ⋅ f 0 ⋅ (13.10) B501 Design based on response statistics is generally the
t recommended procedure for consistent assessment of charac-
teristic load effects.
Sec.13 Page 136 and 137
Sec.4 Page 25
In Eq. 13.15 and 13.16, the letter “e” has been corrected to
greek “ε”. Replace item C201 as follows:
The first occurence of “εcc” in the definitions under Eq 13.16, C201 Fatigue analysis of the riser system shall consider all
has been corrected to “γcc”. relevant cyclic load effects including:
App.B Page 156 Sec.5 Page 29
In item A408, the definition of gauge length has been corrected In Table 5-2, the NOTES and subscripts 1) and 2) refer to the
to 5.65 S 0 . ULS condition only. Replace Table 5-2 as follows:

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.4 – Page 13

Table 5-2 Load effect factors Appendix B Page 71-73

F-load E-load A-load Delete items E100, E101, E102, E103 and equation (B.25) and
Limit state effect effect effect Table B-2. Reference is made to DNV-RP-C203 for relevant
γF γE γA SN curves and applicable SCF.
ULS 1.11) 1.32) NA
Changes Published October 2001
FLS 1.0 1.0 NA
SLS & ALS 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sec.5 Page 33
NOTES In item D604 an absolute value operator is missing for the mo-
1) If the functional load effect reduces the combined load effects, γF shall ment value, M in the equation (5.29). Replace equation (5.29)
be taken as 1/1.1. as follows:
2) If the environmental load effect reduces the combined load effects, γE
shall be taken as 1/1.3. 2
⎛⎛ M ⎞ ⎛ Te ⎞
2
⎞ ⎛p −p ⎞
2

Sec.5 Page 34 ⎜⎜ ⎟+⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎟ +⎜ e min

⎟⎟ ≤ η 4 (5.29)
⎜⎜ M k ⎟ ⎜T ⎟ ⎜⎝ p c (t 2 )
The denominator of the second term on the right hand side of ⎝⎝ ⎠ ⎝ k ⎠ ⎠ ⎠
equation (5.30) should read 2 t3 instead of t3. Replace equation
(5.30) as follows:
DNV-OS-J101: Design of Offshore Wind Turbine
Te 32⋅ M ⋅ (D − t 3 ) Structures, October 2007
σ= +
( )
(5.30)
π ⋅ (D − t 3 ) ⋅ t 3 π ⋅ D 4 − ( D − 2 ⋅ t 3 ) 4 Changes Published December 2008

Appendix A Page 55 Sec.10 Page 96

In item B401, the list numbering has been updated as follows: In item C204, requirement (1), the word “characteristic” has
been corrected to “design”.
1) Geometric stiffness (i.e. contribution from effective ten-
sion to transverse stiffness). Tension variation is hence a Changes Published October 2008
nonlinear effect for risers;
General
2) Hydrodynamic loading. Nonlinearities are introduced by
the quadratic drag term in the Morison equation expressed “DNV Rules for Certification of Lifting Appliances” has been
by the relative structure-fluid velocity and by integration replaced by the “DNV Standard for Certification No. 2.22 Lift-
of hydrodynamic loading to actual surface elevation; ing Appliances” and the references have been changed ac-
cordingly.
3) Large rotations in 3D space;
4) Material nonlinearities, and Changes Published October 2007
5) Contact problems in terms of seafloor contact (varying lo- Sec.1 Page 11
cation of touch down point and friction forces) and hull/
slender structure contact. In Table C3, the reference to NORSOK G-CR-001 has been
corrected to NORSOK G-001.
Appendix B Page 70 Sec.3 Page 38
The s β −1 term in equation (B.19) should read s aβ −1 . Replace In Item G106, the reference to NORSOK G-CR-001 has been
equation (B.19) as follows: corrected to NORSOK G-001.

⎛ ⎛ sa ⎞ β ⎞
f S (sa ) = α −β β −1
β sa exp⎜ − ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ (B.19) DNV-OS-J102: Design and Manufacture of Wind Turbine
⎜ ⎝α ⎠ ⎟ Blades, Offshore and Onshore Wind Turbines, October
⎝ ⎠ 2006

Appendix B Page 70 Changes Published April 2007

The denominator in equation (B.21) should read 2α, instead of
Sec.2 Page 15
α. Replace equation (B.21) as follows:
In item B206, the reference to Section 1 F300 has been correct-
ed to Section 1 E300.
f 0 ⋅ (2α ) 1 ⎧⎪⎛
β
m1 ⎞ ⎛ S sw ⎞ ⎫⎪
m

D= G1 ⎨⎜⎜1 + ⎟; ⎜ ⎟ ⎬ App.F Page 46

a1 ⎪⎩⎝ β ⎟⎠ ⎝ 2α ⎠ ⎪⎭ In item A201, the reference to Section 3 H has been corrected
(B.21) to Section 3.
f ⋅ (2α ) 2
β
m
⎧⎪⎛ m ⎞ ⎛ S ⎞ ⎫⎪
+ 0 ⋅ G 2 ⎨⎜⎜1 + 2 ⎟⎟; ⎜ sw ⎟ ⎬
a2 ⎪⎩⎝ β ⎠ ⎝ 2α ⎠ ⎪⎭

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 14 – Sec.5

SECTION 5
AMENDED RECOMMENDED PRACTICES

Sec.6 Page 13
DNV-RP-B401: Cathodic Protection Design, January
2005 The amendment dated October 2005 (item 6.3.11) has been re-
placed by:
Changes Published April 2008 For internally heated components, the design current density
shall be increased by 0.0002 A/m2 for each °C that the metal /
Sec.6 Page 14 seawater is assumed to exceed 25°C.
In item 6.4.2, the text “coating lifetime” has been changed to Sec.8 Page 21
“coating age”.
Under item 8.6.7, in the third paragraph: ≤ 1.05 V has been
Sec.6 Page 15 changed to ≤ -1.05 V, and in the fifth paragraph: ≤ 1.00 V has
At the end of item 6.9.4, a new sentence has been added as fol- been changed to ≤ -1.00 V.
lows: Aluminium based anodes:
For any current drain to the steel armouring of flexible pipe- electrochemical capacity: minimum 2,500 Ah/kg,
lines, 0.0005 A/m2 (based on the external pipe surface) is rec- closed circuit potential: ≤ -1.05 V at end of the 4th testing pe-
ommended. riod.
Sec.7 Page 18 Zinc based anodes:
In item 7.9.5, the word “and” has been removed between electrochemical capacity: minimum 780 Ah/kg,
“long (and) flush”. closed circuit potential: ≤ -1.00 V at end of the 4th testing pe-
Sec.8 Page 20 riod.
In item 8.6.1, the end of first sentence has been changed to Changes Published April 2006
read:
"…except that for aluminium based anodes, two samples shall Sec.1 Page 7
be collected for all heats exceeding 500 kg (unless otherwise In item 1.2.5, at the end of the paragraph, a new sentence has
agreed)". been added as follows:
Sec.10 Annex A Page 24 However, this RP is applicable for CP of components of a
In Table 10-8, The table cell for Anode Type “Long flush pipeline system installed on template manifolds, riser bases
mounted” has been corrected as follows: and other subsea structures when such components are electri-
cally connected to major surfaces of structural C-steel.
Long flush mounted 2) Sec.6 Page 15
L ≥ 4 · width and
L ≥ 4 · thickness Item 6.9.4 has been amended as follows:
6.9.4 Current drain to anchor chains shall be accounted for by
30 m of chain for systems with mooring point topside only. For
Changes Published October 2007 systems with mooring point below the water level, the seawa-
ter exposed section above this point shall also be included. A
Sec.6 Page 14 current drain of 30 m of chain shall also be included for CP of
In item 6.4.5, “fc = 1” has been corrected to “fcf = 1”. anchoring arrangements using chains.
Sec.7 Page 17 Sec.7 Page 18
In item 7.8.6, the following text has been added at the end of Item 7.11.3, in the Guidance note, the text “or less” has been
the paragraph: changed to “or more”.
For any specific protection object (or CP unit, ref. 7.2.1) the Sec.10 Annex A Page 24
highest anode current output to net anode mass ratio should not Table 10-7, the table cell starting with “Long flush mounted”,
exceed that of any other anode by more than 50 %. For all an- has been changed as follows:
odes to be utilised for the full design life, the ratio between net
anode mass (kg) and design life (yrs) should be minimum 0.5 Long flush mounted 2)
and 1.0 for Al-based and Zn-based anodes, respectively. L ≥ 4 · width and
L ≥ 4 · thickness
Sec.7 Page 18
In item 7.9.5, the word “radius” has been changed to Changes Published October 2005
“radius (= width/2)”.
Sec.2 Page 8
In item 7.11.3, first sentence, the word “shall” has been In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted.
changed to “should”.
Sec.5 Page 11
Sec.10 Annex A Page 24
A new item 5.8.3 has been added, and the succeeding items
In Table 10-7, a reference to Note 2) has been included for have been renumbered accordingly:
both “stand off anodes” (long and short).
5.8.3 For large and complex structures like e.g. multi-well
subsea production units, extensive use of coating is required to
Changes Published October 2006 limit the overall current demand and to ensure adequate current
distribution. The CP design procedure in this document does
Sec.5 Page 10 not account for a voltage drop in the seawater remotely from
In item 5.5.7 ASTM A182 has been replaced by ASTM A193. anodes.

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.5 – Page 15

To compensate for this, the design coating breakdown factors
to be used for CP design are deliberately selected in a conserv-
ative manner to ensure that a sufficient total final current out-
put capacity is installed. As a consequence, any calculations of
the electrolytic voltage drop away from the anodes (e.g. by
means of finite or boundary element analyses) and using these
coating breakdown factors may result in excessively high elec-
trolytic voltage drops, indicating marginal or even insufficient
cathodic protection in terms of the estimated protection poten-
tial.
This will primarily apply to relatively long design lives when
the calculated coating breakdown, and hence current demands
and electrolytic voltage drop increase exponentially.
Sec.6 Page 13
A new sentence has been added at the end of item 6.3.11 as fol-
lows:
For internally heated components, the design current density
shall be increased by 0.002 A/m2 for each °C that the metal /
seawater is assumed to exceed 25°C.
same Z-coordinate.
Any unbalance in loads of significance (hydrodynamic pres-
sure vs. model acceleration) should be dealt with to avoid un-
physical support reactions. Inertia relief can be used to achieve
this. This method involves adjustment of model accelerations
to get zero support reactions. It is important that the inertia re-
lief function is applied only as minor adjustment to the model
accelerations, i.e. the initial model is in reasonable balance.
Figure 4-20 illustrates a statically undetermined set of bound-
ary conditions with spring stiffness. The total vertical stiffness
should be according to the water plane area. Using spring stiff-
ness is appropriate when a significant unbalance in loads can-
not be resolved, e.g. when inertia relief cannot be used. There
should be enough springs so as to distribute the unbalance over
several points. The higher unbalance the more springs. And
these springs should be at "strong" points in the model so as to
limit the effect of unphysical support reactions.

Sec.6 Page 14
A new sentence has been added at the end of item 6.4.3 as fol-
lows:
The coating breakdown factors as established in Annex A are
based on considerations addressed in 5.8.3.

Changes Published April 2005

Sec.7 Page 17
Equation (3), in item 7.8.2 has been corrected as follows:

N ( Ec ° – Ea ° ) N ⋅ ΔE°-
I c = N ⋅ I a = --------------------------------
- = ------------------ (3) Figure 4-19
Ra Ra Statically determined boundary conditions

Sec.8 Page 21
Item 8.7.3, has been amended to read:
8.7.3 Contractor shall issue an inspection document according
to EN 10204 or ISO 10474, inspection certificate 3.1.B.

DNV-RP-C103: Column-Stabilised Units, February 2005

Changes Published April 2008

Sec.4 Page 23
Item 4.8.4 has been clarified and now reads as follows:
4.8.4 Boundary conditions
Figure 4-20
To avoid rigid body motion of a global structural model at least Statically undetermined boundary conditions with springs
6 degrees of freedom have to be fixed.
Fixed boundary conditions may be used for a statically deter-
mined set of boundary conditions while spring stiffness is
more appropriate for a statically undetermined set of boundary DNV-RP-C201: Buckling Strength of Plated Structures,
conditions. October 2002
A statically determined set of boundary conditions is illustrat- Changes Published October 2008
ed in Figure 4-19, with the following restraints:
Part.1 Sec.3 Page 7
— 3 vertical restraints (Z)
— 2 transversal horizontal restraints (Y) In item 3.4 the reference to Chapter 0 has been corrected to
— 1 longitudinal horizontal restraint (X). Chapter 10.
Part.1 Sec.7 Page 18
Note that in the figure the two points with fixation in Y must
have the same Y-coordinate and all three points must have the In Figure 7-3, in the lower left figure, the placement of the

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 16 – Sec.5

measuring line for ef has been corrected: 1.5.8 The offshore WSD format in PULS terminology implies
b b that η < ηp where ηp is permissible usage factor given in the
. offshore standard DNV-OS-C201 and η is the actual usage
factor as calculated by the PULS code.
a tf c tf Section 1.6 has been changed as follows:
c 1.6 PULS software features
hw hw
1.6.1 The PULS code is supported by two separate stand-alone
tw tw user interfaces applying the same input/output file format
(pbp):
— Advanced Viewer (AV): Simple cell input of data with ba-
sic result presentation. More results available such as 3D
graphics of buckling deflections, redistributed stresses, ca-
pacity curves for combined loads etc.
— Excel spread sheet: Simple data input and output line by
b line. A special option for systematic variation of main de-
ef C sign parameters such as stiffener height etc. is available.

c
1.6.2 The PULS code is also available in a dll format (Puls-
tf ComClasses) for implementation as a post-processor in linear
zt FE codes or similar analyses tools.
B
hw hw 1.6.3 The software features and basic theoretical background
A
e tw is found in Ref.[3]. More details, publications, papers etc. can
tw zp be found on the DNV internet site www.dnv.com

In section 1.7, the third reference has been changed as follows:

/3/ NAUTICUS HULL, User Manual - PULS, July 2007,
A = centroid of stiffener with effective plate flange. DNV Software.
B = centroid of stiffener exclusive of any plate flange.
C = centroid of flange.
Changes Published October 2004
Figure 7-3 Cross-sectional parameters for stiffeners and
girders Part.1 Sec.6 Page 12
Part.1 Sec.7 Page 19 In item 6.5, after the sentence: σx,Rd is given by eq. (6.1) and
σy,Rd is given by eq. (6.5)., a new sentence has been added as
Equation 7.36 has been corrected, and now reads: follows:
3
hw ⎛ t ⎞ Part.1 Sec.7 Page 16
C= ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (1 − η)
s ⎝ tw ⎠ In item 7.2, after equation 7.10, the following sentence has
been added:
Equation 7.40 has been corrected, and now reads:
1
p0 = 0 in case σy,Sd is in tension along the whole length of the
panel.
⎛⎛ σ c c c ⎞c
2 fy ⎜ ⎜ x,Sd ⎞⎟ ⎛⎜ σ y,Sd ⎞⎟ ⎛⎜ τSd ⎞⎟ ⎟ Part.1 Sec.7 Page 17
λe = ⎜⎜ f + + ⎟
σ j,Sd ⎜ ⎝ Epx ⎟⎠ ⎜⎝ f Epy ⎟⎠ ⎜⎝ f Epτ ⎟⎠ ⎟ In item 7.4, equation 7.18 has been changed as follows:
⎝ ⎠
Part.1 Sec.8 Page 22 fy
τ Sd ≤ τ Rd =
In item 8.1, line three, the reference to equation 7.62 has been 3 ⋅ γM
corrected to 7.64.
Part.1 Sec.8 Page 23
Equation 8.1 has been corrected, and now reads: The text in the paragraph before equation 8.21, has been
N y,Sd = σ y,Sd (lt + AG ) changed as follows:
If the σy stress in the girder is in tension due to the combined
Part.1 Sec.8 Page 24 girder axial force and bending moment over the total span of
the girder CyG may be taken as:
Equation 8.29 has been corrected, and now reads:
Part.1 Sec.8 Page 24
(
μ = 0.35 λTG − 0.6 ) Equation 8.21 has been changed to: CyG = 1.0
Part.2 Sec.1 Page 29 Changes Published April 2004
Item 1.1.5 has been amended as follows:
Part.1 Sec.6 Page 11
1.1.5 The PULS code is programmed in a Visual basic (VB)
environment. Two separate user interfaces are available using In the paragraph above figure 6-1, “Chapter 0” has been
the same input/output file format, see Sec. 1.6. changed to “Chapter 10”.
Part.1 Sec.7 Page 16
Part.2 Sec.1 Page 32 In item 7.2, right column, line 4,“Chapter 0” has been changed
A new Item 1.5.8 has been added as follows: to “Chapter 10”.

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.5 – Page 17

Part.1 Sec.7 Page 20 3.9.7, “fET” has been corrected to “fET“.

In item 7.7.1, right column, last paragraph,“Chapter 0” has Sec.3 Page 17
been changed to “Chapter 10”. Below equation 3.9.9, under the paragraph in the definition of
lT, “lT” has been corrected “lT”.
Changes Published April 2003

Part.1 Sec.3 Table 3.1 Page 9

In Table 3.1, line for ‘Longitudinal stiffened plate panel’, col- DNV-RP-C203: Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel
umn ‘Clause reference’ replace “7” with “5 and 7“. Structures
In Table 3.1, line for ‘Girder supporting stiffened panel’, col- Changes Published October 2008
umn ‘Clause reference’ replace “8” with “5 and 8“.
In case of tension, apply fy/γM. Sec.2 Page 18
Part.1 Sec.7 Equation 7.63 Page 20 A new sentence has been added to the last paragraph in item
2.9.1 as follows:
In “ limitation for use” just ahead/ introducing formula (7.63)
substitute the balancing sign within the mathematical expres- The membrane stress in the considered section should be used
sion from “greater or equal to” i.e.≥ , replacing it with “less for calculation of local bending stress over the thickness to-
than” i.e. < . gether with stress concentration factor from equation (2.9.1).
Sec.3 Page 25
Equations in item 3.3.7 have been corrected as follows:
DNV-RP-C202: Buckling Strength of Shells, October 2002
(Equation 3.3.4)
Changes Published April 2005
6(δ t + δ m − δ 0 ) 1
Sec.1 Page 4 SCF = 1 + β
e -α
t ⎛T⎞ (3.3.4)
Figure 1.1-1 has been changed: 1+ ⎜ ⎟
X
⎝t⎠
where
1 N
Q1 1.82L 1
α= ⋅ β
M1 T Dt
θ P ⎛T⎞
1+ ⎜ ⎟
r ⎝t⎠
l M2
Q2
1.0 3.0
L 2
β = 1.5 – -------------------
- + ----------------------------
l LONGITUDINAL D D 2
STIFFENER Log ⎛⎝ ----⎞⎠ Log ⎛ ----⎞
t ⎝ t⎠
s
l σx RING FRAME
(Equation 3.3.5)
σh
τ 6(δ t − δ m ) 1
SCF = 1 − β
e- α
Sec.1 Page 4 t ⎛T⎞ (3.3.5)
1+ ⎜ ⎟
The following section has been added in order to clarify how ⎝t⎠
this RP shall be used in Working Stress Design (WSD):
(Equation 3.3.6)
1.2 Working Stress Design
This Recommended Practice is written in the load and resist- 6δ t 1
ance factor design format (LRFD format) to suit the DNV Off- SCF = 1 + β
e- α
shore Standard DNV-OS-C101. This standard makes use of t ⎛T⎞ (3.3.6)
material- (resistance) and loadfactors as safety factors. 1+ ⎜ ⎟
⎝t⎠
DNV-RP-C202 may be used in combination with working
stress design format (WSD) by the following method: Sec.4 Page 32
For the formulas used in DNV-RP-C202, including eq. 3.1.3, The second and third equation in item 4.3.4 has been corrected
use a material factor γM=1.15. The utilisation checks should be as follows:
made using a modified permissible usage factor ηp=1.15βη0,
see DNV-OS-C201 Sec. 2 Table E1 for η0 and Sec. 5 Table C1
for β. Δσ ⊥ + Δσ // 1
Δσ 1 = + (Δσ ⊥ − Δσ // )2 + 4 Δτ //2
Sec.2 Page 8 2 2
Equation 2.2.7 has been corrected as follows:
Δσ ⊥ + Δσ // 1
Q
1, Sd
Q
2, Sd (2.2.7)
Δσ 2 = − (Δσ ⊥ − Δσ // )2 + 4 Δτ //2
τ =− sinθ + cosθ 2 2
Q, Sd πrt πrt
Sec.3 Page 16 and 17 App.D Page 115
Under Section 3.9, in the paragraph below equations 3.9.5 and A number of references to figures have been corrected.

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 18 – Sec.5

DNV-RP-C204: Design against Accidental Loads, Novem-

ber 2004

Changes Published April 2005 Vertical velocity,

vz
Sec.3 Page 14 η

L Wetted length = L
The second equation in Section 3.7.2 has been corrected as fol-
lows:

4c1M P plastic collapse resistance in bending for Wave propagation

R0 = the member, for the case that contact
l point is at midspan
Sec.4 Page 20
In Section 4.2, the formula for sc, has been corrected as
follows:

a Wetted length
v t 2 (1 +
)
m+a m Wave heading L
sc = = = characteristic distance
ρ w Cd A p ρ V
2g(1 − w )
m
Sec.6 Page 32 Wet deck area
Equation 6.11 in Section 6.10.2 has been corrected as follows:
1 1 l
= + (6.11)
k k node 2EA

DNV-RP-C205: Environmental Conditions and

Environmental Loads, April 2007

Changes Published October 2008 Wetted length = L

Sec.3 Page 30
In item 3.4.6.2 the reference to Figure 3-9 has been corrected:
Figure 3-8. Wet deck area
Sec.3 Page 37
Wave heading
In item 3.5.13.2, 2nd sentence, Cmax/Hs > 2 has been corrected
to: Cmax/Hs > 1.3. Figure 8-5
Sec.3 Page 38 Definition of wetted length and vertical velocity in wave for
max vertical impact force
In item 3.6.3.4, the definition of ‘σ' has been corrected to:
Changes Published April 2008
σ = std [ln Tz ] = b0 + b1e b h
2

App.D Page 117

Sec.7 Page 68 In Table D-2, row: “Bodies of revolution“, the figure under
In item 7.3.5.4, the definition of ‘vij' has been corrected to: “Spheroids” has been replaced as follows:
vij = kij coth(kijT)
lateral
Sec.8 Page 80
Figure 8-5 has been corrected as follows: 2b
2b

2a

axial

The rightmost formula in the same row has been corrected as

follows:
4
π b2 a
3

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.5 – Page 19

Changes Published October 2007

DNV-RP-E402: Naval Rescue Submersibles, April 2004
Sec.3 Page 32
Changes Published October 2008
In Table 3-1, row: “Vertical particle acceleration, w& “, the
two leftmost formulas have been corrected as follows: General
“DNV Rules for Certification of Lifting Appliances” has been
2π 2 H sinh [k (z + d )] 2π 2 H kz replaced by the “DNV Standard for Certification No. 2.22 Lift-
– cosθ – e cosθ ing Appliances” and the references have been changed accord-
T2 sinh( kd ) T2 ingly.

DNV-RP-C206: Fatigue Methodology of Offshore Ships, DNV-RP-E403: Hyperbaric Evacuation Systems,

October 2006 December 2006
Changes Published April 2007 Changes Published October 2008
Sec.4 Page 26 General
In item 4.4.4, second and third listitem, the references have “DNV Rules for Certification of Lifting Appliances” has been
been corrected to 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 respectively. replaced by the “DNV Standard for Certification No. 2.22 Lift-
ing Appliances” and the references have been changed accord-
Sec.6 Page 33 ingly.
Equation (10) has been corrected as follows:
Changes Published April 2007
0.5
Tmin = ⎛⎜ 2 ⋅ π ⋅ 0.1L ⎞⎟ (10) Sec.1 Page 16
⎝ g⎠
In item D299 the reference to Appendix 1 has been corrected
Sec.10 Page 51 to Appendix A.
Figure 10-1 has been corrected as follows: Sec.7 Page 52
In item B109 the references has been corrected to:
Sec.3 B204 and B205.

DNV-RP-F101: Corroded Pipelines, October 2004

Changes Published October 2006

General - Page 2
The previous acknowledgement has been re-introduced as fol-
Figure 10-1 lows:
Preferred weld shape at bracket toes and grinding Acknowledgements
direction This Recommended Practice is based upon a project guideline
Appendix B Page 63 developed in a co-operation between BG Technology and
DNV. The results from their respective Joint Industry Projects
In item B.2.2, third listitem, the reference has been corrected (JIP) have been merged and form the technical basis for this
to A.1.2. Recommended Practice.
We would like to take this opportunity to thank the sponsoring
companies / organisations for their financial and technical
DNV-RP-C207: Statistical Representation of Soil Data, contributions (listed in alphabetical order):
April 2007
— BG plc
Changes Published October 2007 — BP Amoco
— Health and Safety Executive, UK
Sec.2 Page 16 — Minerals Management Service (MMS)
In Table 2-2, some of the numbers i the middle column has — Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD)
been corrected: — PETROBRAS
— Phillips Petroleum Company Norway and Co-Ventures
Table 2-2 Coefficient c1−α(n) for XC defined as the 5% quantile — Saudi Arabian Oil Company
of X — Shell UK Exploration and Production, Shell Global Solu-
tions, Shell International Oil Products B.V.
n 1− α = 0.75 1− α = 0.90 1 − α = 0.95 — Statoil
3 3.17 5.33 7.66 — Total Oil Marine plc
5 2.47 3.41 4.21
DNV is grateful for valuable co-operations and discussions
10 2.11 2.57 2.91 with the individual personnel of these companies.
15 1.99 2.34 2.57 Sec.3 Page 13
20 1.94 2.21 2.40
In Table 3-11, the second last row has been replaced by:
30 1.88 2.08 2.22
∞ 1.64 1.64 1.64 Relative (e.g. MFL) γm = 0.82 γm = 0.77 γm = 0.73

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 20 – Sec.5

(the value of γm in the right-most cell has been changed from

0.72 to 0.73). DNV-RP-F103: Cathodic Protection of Submarine Pipe-
lines by Galvanic Anodes, October 2003

Changes Published April 2008

DNV-RP-F102: Pipeline Field Joint Coating and Field
Repair of Linepipe Coating, October 2003 Sec.5 Page 10
In item 5.5.1, 2nd paragraph, the reference to 5.6.10 has been
Changes Published April 2006 corrected to 5.6.11.
Sec.3 Page 9 In item 5.6.4, Eq. (10) (Eq. 9 in the printed 2003 version), has
The definition of “Owner” has been added as follows: been corrected (apostrophes removed) as follows:
f'cf = fcf (linepipe) + r · fcf (FJC) (10)
Owner party legally responsible for design, con- The same correction has been made at the end of the Guidance
struction and operation of the pipeline note (apostrophes removed):
Sec.3 Page 9 ... f'cf = fcf (linepipe) + 0.033 fcf (FJC).
In the definition of “Purchaser”, the text “pipeline operator”
has been replaced by “Owner”. Sec.5 Page 12
In item 5.6.10, "ohm·m·106" has been changed to
Sec.5 Page 11 “10-6·ohm·m” (three places).
In item 5.4.6, the first sentence is changed to:
5.4.6 Certain properties related to raw materials “as delivered” Changes Published October 2007
for coating shall be certified per batch or lot (i.e by an “inspec-
tion certificate” - type 3.1.B according to EN 10204 or Sec.8 Page 16
ISO 10474), in accordance with section 2, column “Produc- In table A.1, the row starting with “Single or Dual Layer FBE”
tion”, of the ‘data sheet’ in ANNEX 1 and ANNEX 2. has been corrected from the April 2006 amendment, and now
Sec.5 Page 11 reads as follows:
In item 5.4.7, the text “type 4.2” has been deleted. Single or No. 1 yes 90 1 0.03
Dual Layer FBE
Changes Published October 2005
Changes Published April 2006
Sec.2 Page 7
In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted. Sec.1 Page 5
Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 15 In item 1.1.2, a new paragraph has been added and the Guid-
ance note has been amended as follows:
In the heading for 2nd column from the right, after the text
Coating Material Qualification, the text and PQT has been For pipelines in CRA's susceptible to hydrogen induced stress
added. cracking (HISC) by CP, this concept has the main advantage
that the installation of anodes on the pipeline itself can be fully
This change has also been applied to all the other tables in avoided for shorter lines.
Annex 1.
Guidance note:
FJC/CFR Data Sheet No. 3A Page 25 Apparently all failures of CRA pipelines due to HISC have been
In item 3.1, row starting with “Salt contamination”, Third col- related to the welding of anodes to the pipeline causing stress
umn has been changed to max. 20 mg NaCl/m2. concentrations, susceptible microstructure and defect coating.
The concept of installing anodes on adjacent structures also has
the advantage that the complete anode surfaces are exposed to
Changes Published April 2004 seawater, increasing the anode electrochemical performance and
the anode current output compared to those for anodes partly or
FJC/CFR Data Sheet No. 1B Page 17 fully covered by seabed sediments. Moreover, the potential for
damage to the pipeline coating during installation is reduced.
In item 2.1, Lap shear strength has been corrected to:
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
≥ 30 N/cm2
Sec.1 Page 5
FJC/CFR Data Sheet No. 3A Page 26
In item 1.1.3, the text “hydrogen induced stress cracking
In item 3.2, row starting with “Hot water soak test” has been (HISC)” has been changed to “HISC”.
corrected as follows:
Sec.1 Page 5
Hot water GBE/CW6 according by by In item 1.2.2, The second sentence (added during Amendments
soak test Part 1, App. E to standard agreement agreement and Corrections, April 2004), has been amended as follows:
(FJC only) or other agreed
procedure For CP of subsea manifold templates, riser bases and other
subsea structures where components of a pipeline system are
electrically connected to major surfaces of structural C-steel,
Changes Published October 2003 use of DNV-RP-B401 is recommended for CP design (see
1.5.3).
General Sec.1 Page 6
In all references involving Section 4 in the printed issue, Sec- A new item 1.3.3 has been added as follows, and the succeed-
tion 4 shall be corrected to Section 5. ing items have been renumbered accordingly.

DET NORSKE VERITAS

 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
1.3.3 CP design, anode manufacture and anode installation are
typically carried out by three different parties (all referred to as
Contractor in this RP). The party issuing a contract (Purchaser)
may be either the installation contractor or Owner. For defini-
tion of contacting parties and associated terms, see Sec.3.
Sec.1 Page 6
Item 1.5.3 has been amended as follows:
1.5.3 DNV-RP-B401 “Cathodic Protection Design” (2005) cov-
ers CP of other offshore structures than pipelines. However, it is
applicable for certain components of a pipeline system like
those installed on manifold templates and riser bases (see 1.3.1).
Sec.3 Page 7
The definition of “Owner” has been added as follows:
Owner party legally responsible for design, con-
struction and operation of the pipeline
Sec.3 Page 7
In the definition of “Purchaser”, the text “pipeline operator”
has been replaced by “Owner”.
Sec.5 Page 8
In item 5.2.4, a new sentence has been added before the last
sentence:
For any larger surfaces, DNV-RP-B401 is recommended for
calculations of CP current demands.
In item 5.2.4, first Guidance note (added during Amendments
and Corrections, April 2004), the text “pipeline owner” has
been changed to “Owner/Purchaser”.
Sec.5 Page 10
In item 5.6.1, Guidance note (added during Amendments and
Corrections, October 2005), a new sentence has been added as
follows:
Except for very long design lives (> 30 years), a typical brace-
let anode size (i.e. convenient for casting) will then give an in-
stalled anode net mass that exceeds the calculated required net
anode mass.
Sec.5 Page 11
In item 5.6.9, Guidance note (added during Amendments and
Corrections, October 2005), the reference to eqn. (16) has
been corrected to equation (17).
Sec.6 Page 12
Item 6.1.1 has been amended as follows:
6.1.1 This section covers the manufacturing of galvanic
anodes, including preparation of anode cores. The require-
ments and guidelines in this section are in compliance with
those in ISO 15589-2, Sec. 8 and Sec. 9, giving some amend-
ments, mostly related to quality control. This section is prima-
rily intended for manufacturing of pipeline (bracelet type)
anodes. For manufacture of other anodes located on adjacent
structures electrically connected to the pipeline and intended
for pipeline CP, see DNV-RP-B401.
Sec.7 Page 15
In item 7.6.3, the reference to DNV-RP-F106 has been correct-
ed to DNV-RP-F102.
Sec.7 Page 15
In item 7.7.2, the reference to DNV-RP-F106 has been correct-
ed to DNV-RP-F102.
Sec.8 Page 16
In table A.1, the row starting with “Single or Dual Layer FBE”
has been amended as follows:
Single or No. 1 no 90 3 0.1
Dual Layer FBE
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Sec.5 – Page 21
Sec.8 Page 16
In table A.2, the row starting with “3A FBE” has been amend-
ed as follows:
3A FBE none 90 CDS no. 1 3 0.3
Changes Published October 2005
Sec.1 Page 6
In item 1.3.1, the Guidance note has been deleted.
Sec.2 Page 7
In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted.
Sec.5 Page 8
In item 5.2.2, a new sentence has been added to the Guidance
note as follows:
For CP calculations, a minimum cut-back length of 0.20 m
should be applied.
Sec.5 Page 9
In item 5.2.9, a new Guidance note has been added as follows:
Guidance note:
ISO 15589-2 recommends constants a and b in eqn (2) for gener-
al types of pipeline coating systems assuming that the reduction
of current demand for CP (i.e. per surface area) is the same for
linepipe and FJC (quote: field joints having a quality equivalent
to factory-applied coatings).
This RP, however, refers to specific combinations of linepipe and
FJC coating and takes into account their relative surface area
(eqn. 9). The calculated FJC coating breakdown factor may then
be 3-30 times higher than for the linepipe coating. For certain
combinations of parent and linepipe coating, the calculated over-
all coating breakdown using the constants in Annex 1 may be sig-
nificantly lower than in the ISO standard.
This is justified by the specific requirements to coating design
and quality control of coating application in the referenced DNV-
RP-F102 and DNV-RP-F106; the ISO standard referring to the
generic type of coating (e.g. fusion bonded epoxy) or purpose of
coating (e.g. thermal insulation) and to (quote:) commonly ap-
plied industry standards.
The constants recommended in Annex 1 are only applicable if the
actual coating specifications are in general compliance with the
referred DNV RP's. However, for certain combinations of coat-
ing systems (e.g. asphalt and coal tar enamel plus FJC based on
tape or sleeves with infill), the CP system can readily be designed
so that the current demands of both standards are fulfilled
(see also Guidance notes to 5.4.1 and 5.6.9).
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
Sec.5 Page 9
In item 5.3.2, the following text has been added at the end of
the Guidance note: (See also Guidance note to 5.2.9).
Sec.5 Page 9
In item 5.4.1, a new Guidance note has been added as follows:
Guidance note:
The total net anode mass calculated from eqn. (5) may be consid-
ered as an absolute minimum value. If a default anode distance
of 300 m is adopted (5.6.1), typical bracelet anode dimensions
will normally give a significantly higher anode mass to be in-
stalled. Any excess anode mass installed can be utilised as a con-
tingency in case the calculated current demand was
underestimated due to e.g. pipeline components not included in
the current demand calculations, or unforeseen mechanical dam-
age to the coating during installation and/or operation, or if the
design life of the pipeline is extended. (For inclusion of contin-
gency in pipeline CP design, see Guidance note to 1.2.1).
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 22 – Sec.5
Sec.5 Page 10
In item 5.6.1, a new Guidance note has been added as follows:
Guidance note:
For medium and long distance export pipelines with concrete
coating, the concept of using pre-installed anodes and with a de-
fault maximum distance of 300 m is adequate for most purposes.
(See Guidance note to 5.4.1)"
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
Sec.5 Page 10
In item 5.6.2, a new Guidance note has been added as follows:
Guidance note:
Also the ISO 15589-2 encourages CP of short pipelines by an-
odes located at each end of the pipeline. To calculate the protec-
tive length of such anodes, this standard recommends so-called
attenuation calculations contained in an Annex A. These formu-
las are fairly complicated and contain the pipe-to-electrolyte in-
sulation resistance as the most critical parameter and which
(quote:) should be selected based on practical experience. This
RP, however, offers a simplified approach with specification of
all required design parameters.
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
In item 5.6.4, in the Guidance note, the word minimum has
been inserted after “..0.20 m, a default”.
Sec.5 Page 11
In item 5.6.9, a new Guidance note has been added as follows:
Guidance note:
The minimum anode distance (L) calculated from eqn (16) may
be considered as an absolute minimum value and not an optimum
distance. The definition of distance between bracelet anodes (i.e.
other than the default value of 300 m recommended in 5.6.1) will
be dependant on the anode design, the installation concept (on-
shore/offshore installation) and the minimum net anode mass re-
quired (see 5.4.1).
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
Sec.6 Page 13
Item 6.7.3, has been changed as follows:
6.7.3 Contractor shall issue an inspection document corre-
sponding to the requirements given in EN 10204 or ISO 10474,
inspection certificate 3.1.B.
Sec.8 Page 16
At the bottom of Tables A.1 and A.2 the following text has been
added:
Note: x100 in the heading of the two column to the right
means that all figures in these columns have been multiplied
by a factor of 100; i.e. before use in eqns. (2) or (4), the num-
bers shall be multiplied with a factor 10-2.
Changes Published April 2004
Sec.5 Page 8
After Table 5-1, a new Guidance note has been added:
Guidance note:
The design current densities in Table 5-1 are applicable inde-
pendent of geographical location and depth but should be consid-
ered as minimum values. Based on special considerations, the
pipeline owner may chose to specify higher design values than
those in Table 5-1.
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
Sec.5 Page 10
The equation in item 5.6.3, that wrongly has the number
“7”(same as the equation in 5.5.3), has been renumbered “8”.
The succeeding equations has been renumbered accordingly.
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Sec.5 Page 10
In item 5.6.4, the Guidance note has been amended to read:
Guidance note:
The length of cut-back refers to the corrosion protective coating.
For cutbacks with length < 0.20 m, a default value of 0.20 m is
recommended. With this default value, and for a pipeline section
with all joints of 12 m length approximately,
r = 0.033 and f'cf = f'cf (linepipe) + 0.033 f'cf (FJC).
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
Sec.5 Page 11
In item 5.6.9, the 2nd last paragraph, the text “becomes 4L in
stead of 2L” is corrected to “becomes L in stead of 2L”.
Sec.8 Page 16
A new row has been added at the bottom of table A.1 with the
text:
Note that the values for 'a' and 'b' in the two columns to the
right have been multiplied by a factor 100.
Sec.8 Page 16
In Table A.2, FJC Type 1A, 3rd column from right, the text
“CDS no. 5 and 6” is corrected to “CDS no. 5 and 6 with con-
crete”.
Sec.8 Page 16
In Table A.2, FJC Type 2A, 3rd column from right, the text
“CDS no. 5 with concrete” is corrected to “CDS no. 2 with
concrete”.
DNV-RP-F106: Factory Applied External Pipeline Coat-
ings for Corrosion Control, October 2003
Changes Published April 2006
Sec.3 Page 9
The definition of “Owner” has been added as follows:
Owner party legally responsible for design, con-
struction and operation of the pipeline
Sec.3 Page 9
In the definition of “Purchaser”, the text “pipeline operator”
has been replaced by “Owner”.
Sec.5 Page 11
In item 5.4.6, the first sentence is changed to:
5.4.6 Certain properties related to raw materials (as-delivered)
for coating shall be certified per batch / lot (i.e. by an “inspec-
tion certificate” type 3.1.B according to EN 10204 or
ISO 10474), in accordance with section 2, column “Produc-
tion”, of the relevant ‘coating data sheet’ (CDS) in ANNEX 1.
Sec.5 Page 11
In item 5.4.7, the text “type 4.2” has been deleted.
Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 18
In the first column, third row from below, “110°C” has been
changed to “80°C” (two places).
Changes Published October 2005
Sec.2 Page 7
In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted.
Sec.5 Page 13
Item 5.9.4, has been amended as follows:
5.9.4 Contractor shall issue an inspection document corre-
 DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Sec.5 – Page 23

sponding to the requirements given in EN 10204 or ISO 10474, The definition of τ has been changed as follows:
inspection certificate 3.1.B.
Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 15 τ Number of oscillations in the design bottom velocity
spectrum = T / Tu
In the heading for 2nd column from the right, after the text
Coating Material Qualification, the text and PQT has been Sec.3 Page 11
added.
Equation 3.3 has been replaced as follows:
This change has also been applied to all the other tables in
Annex 1.
Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 16 ⎛ ⎛ z0 ⎞ ⎛ D ⎞ ⎞
⎜ ⎜1 + ⎟ ⋅ ln⎜ + 1⎟ − 1 ⎟
In item 3.2, row starting with Hot water soak test, the text in ⎜⎝ D ⎠ ⎜⎝ z 0 ⎟ ⎟
⎠
the third column has been changed to “according to standard”. Vc = Vc ( z r ) ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⋅ sin θ c (3.3)
⎜ ⎛ z ⎞ ⎟
Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 17 ⎜ ln⎜⎜ + 1⎟⎟
r
⎟
⎝ ⎝ z0 ⎠ ⎠
In the first column, 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 have been changed to 2.1.3
and 2.1.4 respectively. Sec.3 Page 12
Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 18
Equation 3.15 has been replaced as follows:
In the first column, after 3.2.2 and 3.2.3, PP has been changed
to PE.
Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 23 U* 1 ⎛ 0.5772 ⎞
kU = = ⋅ ⎜ 2 ⋅ lnτ + ⎟ (3.15)
In the row starting with 3.2.1, the text CDS 3, 3.2 has been Us 2 ⎝ 2 ⋅ lnτ ⎠
changed to CDS 1, 3.2 (four locations).
Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 23 Sec.3 Page 14
In the row starting with 3.2.2, the text CDS, 3.2.2 has been In equations 3.25 and 3.26 the letter “G” has been changed
changed to CDS 1, 3.2.2 (four locations). to”GC”.
Sec.3 Page 15
Changes Published April 2004
Equation 3.29 has been replaced as follows:
Sec.5 Page 10
In the Guidance note in item 5.2.3, the text “line spread“ has 3.2 0. 7
been changed to “line speed“. z pi ⎛ G 0. 3 ⎞ ⎛ G 0.3 ⎞
= 0.0071 ⋅ ⎜⎜ c ⎟⎟ + 0.062 ⋅ ⎜⎜ c ⎟⎟ (3.29)
D ⎝ κc ⎠ ⎝ κc ⎠
DNV-RP-F107: Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection, In the paragraph above Figure 3-10, the reference to Eq.
March 2001 (3.38) has been corrected to (3.31).
Changes Published October 2002 Sec.3 Page 16
In the paragraph above Equation 3.34, the greek letter “δ” has
Equation (22) Page 27 been changed to the word “displacement”.
The equation should read:
⎛1 ⎞ Equation 3.34 has been replaced as follows:
F Coll_Riser = F Hit_Platform x ⎜ ---
⎝4
∑ P j⎟
⎠
j = Riser_i τ
Yτ = 0.5 + (10 − 0.5) ⋅ = 0.5 + 0.0095 ⋅ τ (3.34)
(The righthand factors are to be multiplied rather than added.) 1000

Table 3-4 has been replaced as follows:

DNV-RP-F109: On-Bottom Stability Design of Submarine
Pipelines, October 2007 Table 3-4 Minimum weight, L10/(2 + M)2, for pipe on sand
K =5 10 15 20 30 40 60 ≥ 100
Changes Published October 2008 M
Sec.1 Page 7 ≤ 0.2 0.20 0.41 0.61 0.81 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69
0.4 0.31 0.62 0.93 0.81 0.75 0.72 0.70 0.70
In item 1.5.1, the definition of M* has been corrected to read:
0.5 0.34 0.69 1.03 0.93 0.83 0.78 0.75 1.00
M* Steady to oscillatory velocity ratio for single design 0.6 0.79 1.20 1.13 1.10 1.07 1.05 1.03 1.02
oscillation V* /U*. 0.8 0.85 1.40 1.37 1.35 1.33 1.33 1.32 1.31
1.0 1.60 1.50 1.47 1.45 1.43 1.43 1.42 1.41
Sec.1 Page 8 1.5 1.80 1.70 1.67 1.65 1.63 1.63 1.62 1.61
In item 1.5.2, the following has been added: 2.0 1.90 1.80 1.77 1.75 1.73 1.73 1.72 1.71
4.0 2.10 2.00 1.97 1.95 1.93 1.93 1.92 1.91
μ Coefficient of friction. ≥ 10 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, December 2008
Page 24 – Sec.5

Sec.3 Page 17 AppA Page 21

Figure 3-12 has been replaced as follows: Table A-3 has been replaced as follows:

L10 3.0
Table A-3 Parameters for calculating minimum weight,
(2 + M ) 2 L10/(2 + M)2, for pipe on clay, Gc = 0.222
2.8

M = 10 Gc = 0.222
2.6
N ≤ 0.003 0.006 ≤ N ≤ 0.024
2.4 M
C1 C2 C3 Kb C1 C2 C3 Kb
2.2
≤ 0.2 0.1 8 0.5 15 0.1 8 0.5 10
2.0 0.4 0.1 7 0.5 10 -0.3 8 0.5 10
1.8 M = 2.0 0.5 0.1 7 0.5 10 -0.1 7 0.5 10
1.6 0.6 0.1 7 0.5 10 0.0 7 0.5 10
1.4 M = 0.8 0.8 0.1 7 0.5 5 0.1 6 0.5 5
1.0 0.1 7 0.5 5 0.1 6 0.5 5
1.2
1.5 0.1 7 0.5 5 0.5 3 0.5 5
1.0
M = 0.5 2.0 0.1 7 0.5 5 0.9 2 0.5 5
0.8 4.0 0.1 7 0.5 5 1.7 0 0.5 5
0.6 ≥ 10 0.1 7 0.5 5 1.7 0 0.5 5
0.4 M ≤ 0.2

0.2 K
0.0
DNV-RP-F111: Interference Between Trawl Gear and
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pipelines, October 2006

Figure 3-12 Changes Published April 2007

Minimum weight, L10/(2 + M)2, for pipe on sand
Equations 3.36 and 3.37 have been replaced as follows: Sec.4 Page 19
In item 4.4, the paragraph under equation 4.18 has been clar-
Gc ified as follows:
Lstable = 90 ⋅ f (M ) (3.36)
N 0.67 ⋅ K While the maximum downward force (i.e. negative sign) be-
comes:
⎧ C2
C + for K ≥ Kb
L10 ⎪⎪ 1 K C3
= ⎨ C2 (3.37)
(2 + M ) 2 ⎪C + for K < Kb Sec.4 Page 20
⎪⎩ 1 K bC3
In item 4.6, the paragraph under equation 4.23 has been cor-
Sec.3 Page 18 rected as follows:
In the 2nd paragraph below Equation 3.41 the reference to where, as for trawl boards and beam trawls, δp is the displace-
3.4.3 has been corrected to 3.4.2. ment of the pipe at the point of interaction which is unknown
prior to response simulations. Therefore, the value of δp/V
The 3rd paragraph below Equation has been deleted. must be assumed (e.g. δp/V = 0.1Fp/ (kw · V)) and may be cor-
In the paragraph above Table 3-9 the reference to 3.6.5 has rected after response simulations in some sort of iterative ap-
proach.
been corrected to 3.4.5.
Sec.6 Page 22
Sec.3 Page 19
In Table 6-2, second row, the text in the rightmost cell has been
The formula in Figures 3-15 and 3-16 has been replaced as
clarified as follows:
follows:
L Frequency class Usage Dent depth, Hpc
[%] of D
( kU + M * ) 2
Sec.6 Page 23
AppA General
Under Figure 6-1, a new Guidance Note has been added for
In all the tables, the upper left cell has been corrected from clarification:
“0.2” to “≤ 0.2”. Guidance note:
In all the tables and figure titles, the letter “G” has been The annular trawling frequency threshold level where trawl pull-
changed to “Gc”. over loading may be disregarded is one order of magnitude below
the acceptance criteria on total probability of failure, given in
AppA Page 21 DNV-OS-F101. This is to account for that the considered pipe-
The following sentence has been added to the end of the first line section may be exposed to additional accidental loads than
trawling.
paragraph:
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
Linear interpolation can be applied in the region 0.003 < N <
0.006.

DET NORSKE VERITAS