You are on page 1of 4

AKS Inc.

Case Analysis

Proposal: Renting the Squash Courts to a Youth Group


Prepared for: Executive Committee, Chairman, Board of Directors, RFM

Prepared by: Group 11 BLTP


Date: October 10, 2021

This study source was downloaded by 100000854642125 from CourseHero.com on 06-12-2023 10:53:12 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/109617971/AKS-Case-Analysisdocx/
Introduction Draft
Recreation Facilities Limited (RFL) operates several sport complexes and beach

properties in the East African region. AKS is one of the largest facilities operated by RFL,

contains several buildings and offers different activities and services at this location. One of

those buildings called “C” has table tennis room with three tables, two squash courts and the

space given to the Senior Citizen group (SCG). It has come to the attention of the GM that

utilization of squash court is low. The following is a proposal prepared to the senior management

at RFL for consideration to continue operating squash courts instead of renting out the space.

This proposal includes a detailed qualitative and quantitative analysis and a final

recommendation.

Advantages/Pros Draft
Advantages for either accepting or denying the proposal at hand, are considered. If AKS

is to accept the proposal the organization will have the added income of rent from the YG at

$2,500 per month. AKS will also be able to avoid the relevant cost of an hourly worker, and

vending machine costs. Note cost allocation of utilities are irrelevant to this decision because

they are unavoidable common costs for building C regardless of this decision.

Alternatively, AKS could reject the proposal which is advantageous due to opportunity

cost. Loss of memberships, profit sharing with the squash coach, revenue from the vending

machine, and advertising revenues total (insert relevant figure $) as per (Appendix 1). Avoidable

costs related to rejecting the proposal include maintenance cost remaining consistent.

Disadvantages/Cons

There are disadvantages for either decision, whether AKS rents the space to the YG or

not. Beginning with the YG’s proposal itself, there are two main disadvantages that management

This study source was downloaded by 100000854642125 from CourseHero.com on 06-12-2023 10:53:12 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/109617971/AKS-Case-Analysisdocx/
must be aware of. The first is the impact to membership. Should the YG’s proposal be accepted,

and the squash courts are altered, we should be aware that some members of AKS come to only

use the squash courts and may rescind their membership if the facility is no longer available. It is

anticipated that there are around fifteen members who exclusively use the courts, and another

five non-members also use the court in which we anticipate two of them would not return. The

second main disadvantage to accepting the YG’s proposal is the impact of the modifications and

costs incurred. There is a cost to modifying the squash courts for the youth group, which can be

written off over two years and the YG itself will partially invest in. Additionally, we must

consider the severance costs of the part-time employee who will no longer be needed to oversee

the courts. Lastly, it is anticipated that the maintenance costs for running Building C will

increase due to the usage from the YG.

If we do not accept the YG’s proposal and we keep the squash courts, there are also

disadvantages to consider. The first disadvantage is that the usage of the squash courts

themselves is relatively low. Current numbers show about twenty members and non-members

using the squash courts. There is a coach who uses the space and shares some of their revenue

with AKS, but it is not very material. The second consideration is the cost of keeping the squash

courts in place, instead of looking at potential new revenue sources gained. With the YG, they

have offered to invest in the renovations needed, and in addition to paying rent they will also

cover some of the costs of their utilities. The squash courts occupy 30% of space in Building C,

yet only 5% in terms of square feet compared to the entire complex. As an activity, squash does

not occupy a large portion of usage of AKS’ facilities and membership, and thus, the opportunity

cost of keeping the courts in place may not be worth it.

Recommendation & Resolutions for the Issues/Cons [DRAFT]

This study source was downloaded by 100000854642125 from CourseHero.com on 06-12-2023 10:53:12 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/109617971/AKS-Case-Analysisdocx/
Based on the Advantages and Disadvantages outlined above, our recommendation for

AKS is to decline YG’s proposal. In Appendix 1, we observe that the dollar amount effect on Net

Income if AKS accepts the proposal is -$4,386 (includes taxes). As mentioned in the Advantages

section, the opportunity cost of rejecting the proposal is substantial, as AKS would lose cash

flow from loss of memberships, profit sharing with the squash coach, vending machine

commission, and revenues generated from two advertisers, totalling to X. Accepting the proposal

would have increased AKS’s costs in the short- and long-term, as there are modification costs to

renovate the squash courts, severance costs for part-time employees, and increased maintenance

costs to maintain Building C, totalling to X.

In our analysis, there are two issues to consider when declining YG’s proposal. First, the

squash courts, which occupy 30% of Building C, have relatively low usage. Also, the revenues

gained from the squash coach utilizing the space is not substantial. To mitigate this issue, our

recommendation is to increase marketing and awareness efforts to bring in double the number of

members. A strategy that could be implemented by AKS is to repurpose one of the five

advertisers to promote the squash courts. In the short-term, $6,000 will be lost in advertising

revenue; however, costs can be recouped by additional annual memberships gained, with a

potential increase in cash flow by $22,000. Second, the cost of maintaining the squash courts is a

consideration for AKS, as the total maintenance costs are X. However, current maintenance costs

are relatively low in comparison to remodelling the squash courts, and therefore, is a non-issue to

AKS.

Conclusion (Naresh)

This study source was downloaded by 100000854642125 from CourseHero.com on 06-12-2023 10:53:12 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/109617971/AKS-Case-Analysisdocx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like