Rubric for Group Debate Team

General Description of the parameters

4- Exemplary: The performance (argument, organization, and analogies) is comprehensive and impressive. It also shows strong evidence that learners exceeded the learning
competencies. The preparedness and well-researched argument is evident.
3 - Proficient: The performance (argument, organization, and analogies) is comprehensive but needs further improvement. It also shows adequate evidence that learners
exceeded the learning competencies. The student did prepare for the debate, however the arguments are somehow well-researched.
2- Developing: The performance (argument, organization, and analogies) is somehow comprehensive and needs further improvement. Evidence also suggests the learning
competency is met at minimum. The student did prepare for the debate, however the arguments are not well-researched.
1- Beginning: The performance (argument, organization, and analogies) is neither comprehensive and needs significant improvement. Evidence also suggests that students
failed to meet the learning competency. Lastly, the student did not prepare for the debate, and the arguments are not well-researched.

For Opening Statement:

Category Criteria 4- 3- 2- 1-
Exemplary Proficient Developing Beginning

Learning Competency:
● Identify the classical philosophies and their implication for business principles and practices

Content Includes Clearly, accurately used the philosophy in developing the argument/
● Case theory/ theme / motto position.
● Summary of the facts of the
case
● Philosophical elements and The philosophy is correctly used to show the implication in practice
review of applicable ethical and principles shown in the business case
concept

Philosophical elements and review of applicable ethical concept are

correct.

Analogies fit and enhance jury understanding.

Organization: Clear sequencing that logically weaves together all required content
● Logically organized
For Interpellation from and Other Debate Team:
Category Criteria 4- 3- 2- 1-
Exemplary Proficient Developing Beginning

Learning Competency:
● Identify the classical philosophies and their implication for business principles and practices

Strength of Brief & Oral Argument Ability to answer questions promptly

● Makes at least 2-3 main
arguments. Arguments are
persuasive and demonstrate Continuation of argument after answering questions
understanding of the case

Handling of case weaknesses

Persuasiveness

Flexibility in presenting points in response to questions

For Closing Statement:

 Category Criteria 4- 3- 2- 1-
Exemplary Proficient Developing Beginning

Learning Competency:
● Identify the classical philosophies and their implication for business principles and practices

Content Includes Clearly, accurately used the philosophy in developing the argument/ position.
● Review of case
philosophy
● Specific references to
helpful / damaging Numerous references to the preceding statements
testimony from the
case
● Philosophical
elements and review Philosophical elements and review of applicable ethical concept are correct.
of applicable ethical
concept
Analogies fit and enhance jury understanding.

Organization: Clear sequencing that logically weaves together all required content
● Logically organized

Total Parameter x 15 = TOTAL SCORE ______/60

References:

Classroom Mock Trial Evaluation & Rubric Resources. (n.d.). Classroom Law Project. Retrieved May 24, 2023, from

https://classroomlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Classroom-Mock-Trial-Evaluations-Rubrics.pdf

iRubric: Moot Court Brief rubric - CX77644. (n.d.). RCampus. Retrieved May 24, 2023, from https://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=CX77644&sp=yes&
Prepared by:

MS. QUENCE ROSE B. CAMARA

ABM, Teacher

MR. JUSTIN NIKKO G. LAZO

ABM, Teacher

Approved by:

MR. ROBERT CONTRERAS

ABM, Strand Coordinator