Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Tests for detection of antibodies, antigens, and immunologic evidence of
microbial infections are reviewed in this chapter. Appropriate uses of these
tests for diagnosis of infectious diseases are also discussed. Immune assays
and experimental systems are designed to assist in assessment of patho-
genic response, and are instrumental in our understanding of the patho-
physiology of disease. The exquisite specificity of the antibody allows its
use as an efficient analytical tool in biomedical research and diagnostic
investigation.
The heart of the immune assays is the ability of antibodies to specifi-
cally recognize target shapes (antigens) unique to pathogenic molecules.
The interactions between antigen and antibody form the basis of many
quantitative and qualitative diagnostic assays which involve noncovalent
binding of antigenic determinants (epitopes) to the variable regions of
both the heavy and light immunoglobulin chains. The use of antibodies
Latex Agglutination
The latex agglutination reaction is a variation on the clumping ability
observed when a sample containing the specific antigen is mixed with
an antibody coated on the surface of latex particles. The agglutination
reaction may also be reversed, with specific antigen coated on the latex
particle, and testing done on a sample to determine the presence of spe-
cific antibodies. The use of synthetic beads offers the advantages of con-
sistency, uniformity, and stability. Furthermore, the latex agglutination
assay offers a rapid advantage for quick results, often determined within
minutes. Other advantages include versatility of synthetic beads for use
(allowing binding of chemically complex antigens), simplicity of design,
ease of performance, and ability to work using small quantities of sam-
ple. Finally, this type of reaction does not by definition require expensive
equipment for assessment of samples. A word of caution should be noted
in that contaminations in sample preparations may lead to interference
and false negatives.
Lateral Flow
The lateral flow assay (LFA) is a paper-based platform for the detection
and quantification of molecules in complex mixtures [2]. It is relatively
rapid, and results may be obtained within a 30 minutes time period. A
microstructured polymer is used to transport fluid, acting first as a sponge
to hold sample (such as urine or serum). Fluid then migrates to secondary
conjugate pad in which a dried bio-active particle resides in a salt–sugar
matrix, thus permitting optimized chemical reactivity between the target
antigen and its immobilized partner antibody. The flowing fluid dissolves
the matrix salts while also allowing transport through the pored structure.
Antigens bind to particles as they migrate with the fluid flow through
reactive zones. A third level of capture, usually onto an immobilized strip,
permits binding of the complex. The LFA can operate as a capture assay
where the antigen is sandwiched between antibodies directed toward mul-
tiple determinants on the molecule targeted for assessment. Alternatively,
the assay can be set as a competitive assay, quantitating antigen presence
through competitive assessment.
224 Microbiology and Molecular Diagnosis in Pathology
Table 11.1 Representative antigen testing for specific pathogen classes (Continued)
Pathogen class Organism Specimen type Additional
comments
Parasites Cryptosporidium, Stool EIA is more
Giardia sensitive than
microscopy
Malaria Blood Microcopy
common,
antigen testing
useful when
no expertise in
smear reading
Toxoplasma Serum TORCH
evaluation
TORCHS, Toxoplasma, Rubella, CMV, HSV, and Syphilis.
Immuno-Diffusion
The no longer used Ouchterlony assay, developed in the 1950s, represents
the historical model for characterization of precipitin reactions that fall
into the category of immune-diffusion (ID) assessment. Simply put, in an
ID assay, applied antigen diffuses through a gel matrix containing reactive
antibodies; as antigen and antibody meet, the diameter of the precipitin
ring formed can be quantitated by comparison to known standard anti-
gen concentrations. A variation of this, the radial ID assay, allows quantita-
tive measurement of antigen. Specifically, antibody is directly incorporated
into the assay gel matrix. This permits qualitative determination as anti-
body and antigen diffuse toward each other through the matrix. A precipi-
tin ring forms as the antigen and antibody interact; the amount of antigen
applied to the well is proportional to the diameter of the precipitin ring.
Comparison of unknown samples to known antigen concentrations allows
quantitative analysis.
Complement Fixation
The complement fixation test is a blood test in which a sample of serum
is exposed to a particular antigen and complement in order to deter-
mine whether or not antibodies to that particular antigen are present. The
nature of complement is to react in combination with antigen–antibody
complexes. The relative lack of antigen specificity allows complement to
react with almost any antigen–antibody complex. In the test procedure,
complement remains free unless fixed by the particular antigen and anti-
body system in question. The indicator used in many complement fixa-
tion assays is sheep RBCs. In a positive or reactive test, the complement
is bound to an antigen–antibody complex and is not free to interact with
target RBCs. The RBCs remain unlysed and settle to the bottom of the
well to form a button. In a negative or nonreactive test, the complement
remains free to interact with the blood cells causing them to lyse. The
complement test is a powerful tool to identify antibodies reacting with
antigens, and it permits confirmation of exposure to a specific microor-
ganism. For example, the Wasserman reaction is an example of a diagnos-
tic complement fixation test to detect antibodies to the syphilis organism
Treponema; a positive reaction indicates the presence of antibodies and
therefore syphilis infection.
active infection. Often, false positive IgM can be found due to nonspecific
factors like connective tissue diseases. Indeed, it takes time for antibody
titers to rise postexposure; for example, a fourfold rise in titer between
acute and convalescent is really necessary for diagnosis of current disease.
Therefore, the power in detection may be of more use for epidemiologi-
cal analysis and diagnosis of uncommon diseases where the majority of the
community population has not been exposed to the organism (and there-
fore have no detectable antibody). Finally, these tests can be useful to prove
immune status in pregnant women, although there are limits for utility in
infants since most IgG represents maternally derived antibody.
KEY POINTS
Immune-based assays are designed to assess the presence pathogenic
●
assays, which are useful as diagnostic tools for multiple antigens pres-
ent in small clinical samples. Automation in the laboratory setting has
reduced detection time, while maintaining and/or increasing sensitivity.
Rapid chromatographic immunoassays are immunoaffinity procedures
●
REFERENCES
[1] Kohler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of pre-
defined specificity. Nature 1975;256(5517):495–7.
[2] Koczula KM, Gallotta A. Lateral flow assays. Essays Biochem 2016;60(1):111–20.
[3] Anfossi L, Giovannoli C, Baggiani C. Mycotoxin detection. Curr Opin Biotechnol
2016;37:120–6.
[4] Moser AC, Hage DS. Immunoaffinity chromatography: an introduction to applications
and recent developments. Bioanalysis 2010;2(4):769–90.
[5] Actor JK. Elsevier’s integrated review immunology and microbiology. Philadelphia, PA:
Elsevier; 2011.