CIVIL PROCEDURE

Judge Edilwasif Baddiri

AdZU S.Y. 2020-2021

Syllabus by Prof Jaime Caringal

I. INTRODUCTION
A. Objectives of, and power to promulgate, rules of pleading, practice and procedure.

CONST, Art. VIII, Sec 5 (5)

1. Shoji v. Harvey, 43 Phil. 333 (1922)

2. Republic v. De Los Angeles, 567 SCRA 722 (2008)
3. Can v. CA, 335 SCRA 302 (2000)
4. Zulueta v. Asia Brewery, 354 SCRA 100 (2001)
5. Bernabe v. Alejo, 374 SCRA 180 (2002)
6. Spouses Bergonia v. CA, G.R. No. 189151, January 25, 2012
B. General Provisions

Rule 1

1. Casalla v. People of the Philippines, 391 SCRA 344 (2002)

2. Manguerra v. Risos, 563 SCRA 499 (2008)
3. Heirs of Yaptinchay v. Del Rosario, 304 SCRA 18 (1999)
4. System Factors Corp. v. NLRC, 346 SCRA 149 (200)
5. Labao v. Flores, 634 SCRA 723 (2010)
6. BPI v. CA, G.R. No. 168313 October 6 2010
7. CMTC International v. Bhagis International Trading, G.R. No. 170488

2012

1. Redena v. CA, G.R. No. 146611, February 6, 2007

II. JURISDICTION
A. General Concepts

CONST., Art VIII, Secs 1 and 2

1. De Pedro v. Romasan Development Corp. G.R. No. 194751, Nov. 26,2014

Jurisdiction conferred by law, not by agreement of the parties

1. Republic v. Bantigue Point Development Corp., G.R. No. 162322, March 14, 2012

Determined by the law in force at the time of commencement

1. Dela Cruz v. Moya, 160 SCRA 838 (1988)

1
Determined by the allegations of the complaint or other initiatory pleadings

1. Boleyley v. Villanueva, G.R. No. 128734, September 14, 1999

2. Mendoza v. Germino, G.R. No. 165676, November 22, 2010
3. Irene Sante and Reynaldo Sante v. Hon. Edilberto Claravall, et al., G.R. No. 173915,
February 22, 2010
4. Julao v. Spouses De Jesus, G.R. No. 176020, September 29, 2014
5. Tumpag v. Tumpag, G.R. No. 199133, September 29, 2014

Jurisdiction over the parties

1. Planters Development Bank v. Chandumal, G.R. No. 195619, September 5, 2012

2. Boston Equity Resources v. CA, G.R. No. 173946, June 19, 2013

Jurisdiction over the issues

Jurisdiction over the res

1. Biaco v. Philippine Country side Rural Bank, G.R. No. 161417, February 8, 2007

Difference between jurisdiction and exercise of jurisdiction

1. Platinum Tours v. Panlilio, G.R. 133365, September 16, 2003

Difference between jurisdiction and venue

1. Nocum v. Tan, G.R. No. 145022, September 23, 2005

2. Davao Light and Power v. CA, G.R. No. 111685, August 20, 2001

Payment of Docket Fees/Staggered Docket Fee

1. A.M. No. 04-2-04SC (Re:Proposed Revision of Rule 14, Filing Fees)

2. Manchester Development Corp v. CA 149 SCRA 562 (1987)
3. Sun Insurance v. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274 (1989)
4. Metropolitan Bank v. Perez, G.R. No. 181842, February 2, 2010
5. Proton Pilipinas Corp. v. Banque Nationale de Paris, G.R. No. 151242, June 15, 2005
6. Spouses De Leon v. CA, 287 SCRA 94 (1998)
7. Tokio Marine Insurance Co., Inc. v. Jorge Valdez, G.R. No. 150108

2008

1. Lu v. Lu Ym, G.R. No. 153690, 157381, 170889, August 4, 2009

2. Heirs of Reinoso, Sr. v. CA 654 SCRA (2011)
3. Spouses Gregorio Go and Juana Tan Go v. Tong, G.R. No. 151942, November 27,
2003

Adherence to Jurisdiction; Jurisdiction cannot be ousted

1. Pacific Ace Finance v. EijiYanagisawa, G.R. No. 175303, April 11, 2012
2. Barranda vda de Ballesteris v. Rural Bank of Canaman, G.R. No. 176260, November
24, 2010

2
2010

1. Union Bank of the Philippines v. Concepcion, G.R. No. 160727, June 26, 2007

Effect of lack of jurisdiction

1. Land Bank v. Spouses Placido, G.R. No. 194168, February 13, 2013
2. Padre v. Badillo, G.R. No. 165423, January 19, 2011
3. Tijam v. Sibonghanoy, 23 SCRA 29 (1968)

Suspended jurisdiction

1. PAL v. Kurangking, 389 SCRA 588 (2002)

Hierarchy of Courts

1. Mendoza v. Villas, G.R. No. 187256, February 23, 2011

2. Republic v. Hon. Ramon S. Caguino, G.R. No. 174385, February 20, 2013
3. A.I. Ang Network v. Mondejar, G.R. 200804, January 22, 2014

B. Subject Matter jurisdiction of different courts

a. Supreme Court
CONST., Art VIII, Secs 1 and 5
CONST., Art VI, Sec 30
Rep. Act No. 296 (1948), as amended, Sec 17

1.First Lepanto Ceramics, Inc. v. CA, 237 SCRA 519 (1994)

b. Court of Appeals
B.P. Blg. 129 (1980), as amended by Rep. Act No. 7902, Sec 9

c. Regional Trial Courts

B.P. Blg, 129 (1980), as amended by Rep. Act No. 7902, Secs 18-23

Admin Circular 09-94, 14 June 1994

R.A. No. 7691

1. Encarnacion v. Amiso, 502 SCRA 172 (2006)

2. Radio Communications of the Philippones, Inc. v CA, 386 SCRA 67 (2002)
3. Bokingo v. CA, 489 SCRA 521 (2006)
4. Lu v. Lu Ym, 563 SCRA 254 (2008)
5. Katen v. Palanca Jr., 437 SCRA 565 (2004)
6. Cabrera v. Francisco, G.R. No. 172293, August 28, 2013

d. Metopolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts
B.P. Blg. 129 (1980) as amended by Rep. Act No. 7691, Secs 32-36

3
 REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991)
RULE OF PROCEDURE FOR SMALL CLAIMS (2008) (A.M. 08-0-7-SC), as amended by
A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC, , February 10, 2010
SC Administrative Order No. 09-94

1. Reyes v. Sta. Maria, 91 SCRA 164 (1979)

2. Ortigas & Co. Ltd. v. Herrera, 120 SCRA 89 (1983)
3. Ortigas & Co., Ltd v. CA, 106 SCRA 121 (1981)
4. Villostas v. CA 210 SCRA 490 (1992)
5. De Barrera v. Legaspi, 585 SCRA 192 (2008)
6. A.I. Ang Network, Inc. v. Mondejar, G.R. No. 200804, January 22, 2014

NOTE: Uniform Procedure in Trial Courts

Rule 5

A.M., No. 02-11-09-SC

1. Bayubay v. C.A. 224 SCRA 557 (1993)

2. Lucas v. Fabros, A.M. No. MTJ-99-1226, Jan 31, 2000
3. Bongoto v. Malvar, G.R. No. 141614, August 14, 2002
4. Luna v. Mirafuente, A.M. No. MTJ 05-1610, September 26, 2005
5. Go. v. CA G.R. No. 128954, Oct 8, 1998
6. Sec. De Lima v. Gatdula, G.R. No. 204528, February 19, 2013

e. Specialized Trial Courts

a. Family Courts
Rep. Act. No. 8369 (1997), Sec 5
A.M. No. 02-11-10SC, 4 March 2003
1. Madrinan v. Madrinan, 527 SCRA 487 (2007)
b. Commercial Courts
Rep. Act. No. 8799 (2009), Sec. 5.2
Pres. Decree No. 992-A (1976), Sec 5
A.M. No. 01-2-04-SC, March 13, 2001
A.M. No. 00-8-10-SC, December 2, 2008
1.Reyes v. RTC Makati, 561 SCRA 998 (2008)
2.Calleja v. Panday, G.R. No. 168696, February 28, 2006
c. Intellectual Property Courts
Rep. Act No. 8293 (1997)
A.M. No. 02-1-06-SC, January 22, 2002
A.M. No. 03-03-SC, June 17 2003
f. Lupong Tagapamayapa
Rep. Act No. 7160 (1991), Secs. 399-422
Adm Circ No 14-93, July 15, 1993

1.Uy v. Contreras, 237 SCRA 167 (1994)

4
 2.Gonzales v. CA, 151 SCRA 289 (1987)
3.Agbayani v. Belen, 145 SCRA 635 (1986)
4.Blardony v. Coscolluela, 182 SCRA 825 (1990)
5.Wee v. De Castro, 562 SCRA 695 (2008)
6.Aquino v. Aure, 546 SCRA 71 (2008)

g. Shari’a Courts
1.Villagracia v. Fifth Sharia’s District Court, G.R. No 188832, April 23, 2014

III. VENUE
CONST., Art VII, Sec 5 (4)
B.P. Blg. 129 (1980), Sec 18
Rule 4
1. Latorre v. Latorre, 617 SCRA 88 (2010)
2. Uniwide Holdings, Inc. v. Cruz, 529 SCRA 664 (2007)
3. Infante v. Aran Builders. 531 SCRA 123 (2007)
4. Marcos-Araneta v. CA, 563 SCRA 41 (2008)
5. Ang. represented by Eldrige Marvin Aceron v. Sps. Ang, G.R. No. 186993, August 22,
2012
6. Universal Robina Corp. v. Lim, G.R. No. 154338, October 5, 2007
7. Go. v. United Coconut Planters Bank, 442 SCRA 264 (2004)
8. Hoechdt Philippines, Inc. v. Torres, 83 SCRA 413, (1978)
9. Phil. Banking Corp. v. Tensuan, 230 SCRA 413 (1994)
10. Phil Bank of Communications v. Lim, G.R. No. 158135, April 12, 2005
11. Young Auto Supply v. CA, 223 SCRA 670 (1993)
12. Saludo v. American Express, G.R. No. 159507, April 19, 2006
13. San Luis v. San Luis, G.R. No. 133743, Feb 6, 2007
14. United Overseas Bank v. Rosemoor Mining & Dev’t, G.R. No. 159699, March 12, 2007
15. Union Bank of he Philippines v. Maunlad Homes, Inc., G.R. 190071, August 15, 2012

IV. PARTIES
A. General
1. Iron and Steel Authority v. CA, 249 SCRA 538 (1995)
2. PHHC v. Jeremias, 73 SCRA 239 (1976)

B. Capacity to sue and be sued

Rule 3, Secs. 1,4,5 and 15
Rep. Act No. 7042 (1991), Sec 3 (d)
1. MR Holdings Ltd. v. Bajar, 380 SCRA 617 (2002)
2. Ventura v. Militante, G.R. No. 63145, 316 SCRA (1999)
3. Mioza v. Lopez, G.R. No. 170914, April 13, 2011
4. Dep’t of Health v. Phil Pharma Wealth, Inc., G.R. No. 182358, February 20, 2013
5. Air Transportation Office v. Sps. Ramos, G.R. No. 159402, February 23, 2011

5
C. Real Party in interest
Rule 3, Sec. 2
1. Pablo Ralla v. Pedro Ralla, 199 SCRA 495 (1991)
2. Tanpingco v. IAC, 207 SCRA 652 (1992)
3. Oco v. Limbaring, G.R. NO. 161298, January 31, 2006
4. Pascual v. Pascual, G.R. No. 157830, Nov. 17, 2005
5. Equitable PCI Bank, Inc. v. Heirs of Antonio C. Tiu, et al. G.R. No. 178529, September 4,
2009
6. Carlos v. Sandoval, 574 SCRA 116 (2008)
7. Ortiz c. San Migua; Corp., 560 SCRA 226 (2008)
8. Celestial Nickel Mining Exploration Corp. v. Macroasia Corp., 541 SCRA 166 (2007)
9. Go. v. Cordero, G.R. No. 164703, 620 SCRA 1 (2010)

D. Representative parties
Rule 3, Sec. 3
1. Gochan v. Young, 354 SCRA 207 (2001)
2. Samahang Magsasaka ng 53 Hektarya v. Mosquera, 518 SCRA 668 (2007)

E. Class Suit
Rule 3, Sec 12
1. Newsweek v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 142 SCRA 171 (1986)
2. MVRS Publications, Inc. v. Islamic Da’wah Council of the Philippines, 396 SCRA 210
(2003)

F. Joinder of parties (necessary and indispensable parties)

Rule 3, Secs. 6-11

1. Relucio v. Lopez, 373 SCRA 578 (2001)

2. De Galicia v. Mercado, 484 SCRA 131 (2006)
3. Cabutihan v. Landcenter Construction & Dev’t. Corp., 383 SCRA 353 (2002)
4. Speed Distributing Corp., v. CA, 425 SCRA 691 (2004)
5. Leonis Navigation Co., Inc. v. Villamater, 614 SCRA 182 (2010)

G. Substitution of parties
Rule 3, Secs 16-20
1. Brioso v. Rili-Mariano, 396 SCRA 549 (2003)
2. State Investment House, Inc. v. CA, 318 SCRA 47 (1999)
3. Rodriguez v. Jardin, 528 SCRA 516 (2007)

H. Alternative and unknown defendants

Rule 3, Secs 13 and 14

I. Indigent Party
Rule 3, Sec 21

6
 Rule 141, Sec 18

J. Solicitor General
Rule 3, Sec 22

K. New/Additional parties
1. Impleader (Third party complaint)
Rule 6, Secs. 11-13
Rule 11, Sec 5
1. Basbastro v. CA. 48 SCRA 231 (1972)
2. Seaoil Petroleum Corp. v. Autocorp Group, 569 SCRA 387 (2008)
3. Tayao v. Mendoza, 455 SCRA 725 (2005)

2. Intervention
Rule 19
1. GSIS v. Nocom, 543 SCRA 676 (2008)
2. Union Bank v. Concepcion, 525 SCRA 672 (2007)
3. Learning Child, Inc. v. Ayala Alabang Village Association, 624 SCRA 258
(2010)
4. Quinto v. COMELEC, 613 SCRA 385 (2010)
5. Mactan Cebu International Airport v. Heirs of Mioza, 641 SCRA 520
(2011)
6. Pulgar v. RTC Mauban, Quezon, G.R. No. 157583, September 10, 2014

3. Interpleader
Rule 62
1. Wack Wack Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Won, 70 SCRA 165 (1976)
2. United Coconut Planters Bank v. IAC, 183 SCRA 368 (1990)
3. Pasricha v. Don Luis Dision Realty, 548 SCRA 673 (2008)
4. Mesina vs. IAC, 145 SCRA 497 (1986)
5. Ocampo v. Tirona, G.R. No. 147812, 455 SCRA 62 (2005)
6. Maglente v. Padilla, G.R. No. 148182, March 7, 2007
V. SUMMONS
Rule 14
A. Issuance and contents of summons
B. Service of summons
1. By whom issued
Rule 14, Secs 1 and 4
1. Wabe v. Bionson, 418 SCRA 479 (2003)

2. By whom served
Rule 14, Sec 3
1. Bello v. Ubo, 117 SCRA 91 (1982)
2. Talion c. Ayupan, 374 SCRA 243 (2002)

7
 3. Modes of service
Rule 14, Se.cs. 5-18, 23
A.M. No. 11-3-6SC, March 15, 2011

1. Laus v. CA, 219 SCRA 688 (1993)

2. Keister v. Navarro, 77 SCRA 209 (1977)
3. Summit Trading and Dev’t Corp v. Avendano, 135 SCRA 397 (1985)
4. Caringa, Jr. v. Malaya, 143 SCRA 441 (1986)
5. Magdalena Estate, Inc. v. Nieto, 125 SCRA 758 (1983)
6. United Coconut Planters Bank v. Ongpin, 368 SCRA 464 (2001)
7. Guiguinto Credit Crop. v. Torres, 502 SCRA 182 (2006)
8. Guanzon v. Arradaza, 510 SCRA 309 (2006)
9. Potenciano v. Barnes, 562 SCRA 485 (2008)
10. Mangila v. CA, 387 SCRA 162 (2002)
11. Montefalcon v. Vasquez, 554 SCRA 513 (2008)
12. Perkin Elmer Singapore v. Dakila Trading, 530 SCRA 170 (2007)
13. Regner v. Logarta, 537 SCRA 277 (2007)
14. PCIB v. Alejandro, 533 SCRA 738 (2007)
15. Mason v. CA, 413 SCRA 303 (2003)
16. Manotoc v. CA, 499 SCRA 21 (2006)
17. Pascual v. Pascual, 607 SCRA 433 (2008)
18. Velayo-Fong v. Spouses Raymond and Maria Velayo, 510 SCRA 320 (2006)
19. Santos, Jr. v. PNOC Exploration Corporation, 566 SCRA 272 (2002)
20. Robinson v. Miralles, G.R. No. 163584, December 12, 2006

4. Proof of service; alias summons

Rule 14, Secs 4,21-22

5. Return of service
Rule 14, Sec 20
1. Ang Ping v. CA, 310 SCRA 343 (1999)

6. Voluntary appearance
Rule 14, Sec 23
1. United Coconut Planters Bank v. Ongpin, 368 SCRA 464 (2001)
2. Orosa v. CA, 261 SCRA 376 (1996)
3. Lhuillier v. Britis Airways, 615 SCRA 380 (2010)

VI. PLEADINGS
A. Pleadings in general
Rule 6, Secs 1 and 2
Rule 8, Sec 1
B.P. Blg. 129 (1980), Sec 36
B. Complaint

8
 1. Generally
Rule 6, Sec 3
Rule 2, Secs 1 and 2
B.P. Blg. 129 (1980), Sec 33 (1)
1. Macaslang v. Zamora, G.R. No. 156375, May 30, 2011
2. Lourdes Suites v. Binaro, G.R. No. 204729, August 6, 2012
3. China Banking Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 153267, June 23, 2005
4. Samson v. Spouses Gabor, G.R. No. 182970, July 23, 2014

2. Splitting and joinder of cause of action

Rule 2, Secs 3-6
1. BPI v. Coscolluela, G.R. No. 167724, June 27, 2006
2. De Luzuriaga, Sr. v. Adil, 136 SCRA 279 (1985)
3. Progressive Dev’t Corp v. CA, 301 SCRA 637 (1999)
4. Dasmarinas Village Assn. v. CA, 299 SCRA 598 (1998)
5. Flores v. Mallare-Philipps, 144 SCRA 377 (1986)
6. Pantranco v. Standard Insurance, G.R. No. 140746, March 16, 2005
7. Sps. Decena v. Sps. Piquero, G.R. No. 155736, March 31, 2005
8. Uniwide Holdings v. Cruz, 529 SCRA 664 (2007)
9. Umale v. Canoga Park Dev’t Corp., 654 SCRA 155 (2011)
3. Alternative

C. Answer
Rule 6, Secs 4-5
Rule 8, Secs 10-12
Rule 9, Secs 1-2
Rule 11, Sec 11

1. Home Ins. Co. v. Eastern Shipping Lines. 123 SCRA 424 (1983)
2. Gaza v. Lim, 395 SCRA 261 (2003)
3. Balais-Mabanag v. Register of Deeds of Quezon City, 617 SCRA 1 (2010)

D. Counterclaim and cross-claim

Rule 6, Secs 6-9, 12
Rule 9, Sec 2
Rule 11, Secs 8-10
Rule 17, Secs 2,3
1. International Container Terminal Services, Inc. v. CA 214 SCRA 456 (1992)
2. Financial Building Corp. v. Forbes Park Association, 338 SCRA 346 (2000)
3. Meliton v. CA, 216 SCRA 485 (1992)
4. Alday v. FGI Insurance Corp., 250 SCRA 113 (2001)
5. Cruz-Agana v. Santiago-Lagman, 455 SCRA 203 (2005)
6. Ruiz, Jr. v. CA, 212 SCRA 660 (1992)
7. China Airlines v. Chiol, 407 SCRA 432 (2003)

9
 8. Ligon v. CA, 294 SCRA 73 (1998)

E. Reply
Rule 6, Sec 10
Rule 11, Sec 6
1. Veluz v. CA, 345 SCRA 756 (2000)

F. Formal requirements of pleadings

Rule 7
A.M. No. 00-2-10 (May 1, 2000)
Circular No. 10 (July 24, 1995);Bar Matter 287 (September 26, 2000)
Bar Matter no. 1132 (April 1, 2003)
Bar Matter no. 1922 (June 3, 2008
1. Republic v. Kenrick Development Corporation, 498 SCRA 220 (2006)
2. Sameer Overseas Plcaement Agency v. Santos, G.R. No. 152579, August 4, 2009
3. Coca-Cola Bottler (Phils.), Inc. v. Social Security Commission, 560 SCRA 719 (2008)
4. Kaularan v. Uy, 543 SCRA 474 (2008)
5. Valmonte v. Alcala, 559 SCRA 536 (2008)
6. Vallacar Transit, Inc. v. Catubig, G.R. No. 175512, May 30 2011
7. De Formoso v. PNB, G.R. No. 154704, June 1, 2011
8. Phil. Public School Teachers Assn. v. Heairs of Iligan, 496 SCRA 817 (2006)
9. Anderson v. Ho, G.R. No. 172590, January 7, 2013
10. Cagayan Valley v. CIR, G.R. No. 151413, February 13, 2008
11. Zarsona Medical Clinic v. Philippine Health Insurance Corp., G.R. NO. 191225, October
13, 2014
12. Fuentabella v. Castro, G.R. No. 158065, June 30, 2006
13. Metrobank v. Santos, G.R. No. 157867, December 15, 2009

G. Detail in pleading
Rule 8, Secs 1-9
Rule 12
1. Bacolod-Murcia Milling Co., Inc. v. First Farmers Milling Co., Inc., 103 SCRA 436
(1981)
2. Far East Marble v. CA, 225 SCRA 249 (1993)
3. Gonzales v. Climax Mining Ltd., 512 SCRA 148 (2007)
4. Cometa v. CA, 301 SCRA 459 (1999)
5. Luistro v. CA, G.R. No. 158819 April 16, 2009
6. Vda de daffon v. CA, 389 SCRA 427 (2002)
7. Filipinas Textile v. CA, 415 SCRA 635 (2003)
8. Titan Construction v. David, G.R. No. 169548, March 15, 2010
9. Toribio v. Bidin, 134 SCRA 162 (1985)
10. Consolidated Bank v. Del Monte Motor Works, G.R. 1433338, July 29 2005
11. Venzon v. Rural Bank of Buenavista, G.R. 178031, August 28, 2013

10
H. Amended and supplemental pleadings
Rule 10

1. Keramik Industries, Inc. v. Guerero, 61 SCRA 265 (1974)

2. R&B Surety & Ins. Co., Inc v. Savellano, 136 SCRA 312 (1985)
3. Remington Industrial Sales Corp. v. CA, 382 SCRA 499(2002)
4. Cagungun v. Planters Development Bank, 473 SCRA 259 (2005)
5. Philippine Ports Authority v. William Gothong & Aboitiz, Inc. 542 SCRA 514 (2008
6. Wallem Philippines Shippin, Inc. v. S.R. Farms, Inc. GR No. 161849, July 9, 2010
7. Spouses Dionisio v. Linsangan, G.R. No. 178159, March 2, 2011
8. Alpine Lending Investors v. Corpuz, 508 SCRA 45 (2006)
9. Chan v. Cha, 569 SCRA 106 (2008)
10. Asset Privatization Trust v. CA, 324 SCRA 533 (2000)
11. Planters Dev’t Bank v. LZK Holdings and Dev’t Corp., 456 SCRA 366 (2005)
12. Sps. Lambino v. Hom Presiding Judge, G.R. No. 169511, January 24, 2007
13. Delbros Hotel v. IAC, 159 SCRA 533 (1988)

I. Period for pleading

Rule 11
Rule 22

1. Alarilla v. Ocampo, 417 SCRA 601 (2003)

2. Spouses Barraza v. Campos, 120 SCRA 881 (1983)
3. Nactor v. IAC, 158 SCRA 635 (1988)
4. Mayor v. IAC, 161 SCRA 63 (1988)
5. Luz v. National Amnesty Commission, G.R. No. 159708, Septemner 24, 2004
6. Neypes v. CA, 469 SCRA 633 (2003)

J. Filing and service of pleadings and other papers

Rule 13

1. Dela Cruz v. Ramiscal, 450 SCRA 449 (2005)

2. Ello v. CA, 460 SCRA 406 (2005)
3. Domingo v. CA, 611 SCRA 353 (2010(
4. Garrucho v. CA, G.R. No. 143791, January 14 2005)
5. Republic v. Caquioa, et al., 691 SCRA 306 (2013) – SUPRA
6. Barrameda v. Castillo, 78 SCRA 1 (1977)
7. Quelnan v. VHF, G.R. No. 138500, September 16, 2005
8. Amen-Amen v. CA, G.R. No. 143424, August 9, 2001
9. Belen v. Chavez, G.R. No. 175334, March 26, 2008
10. Bracero v. Arcelo, G.R. No. 212496, March 18, 2015

11
 11. Delos Santos v. Elizalde, 514 SCRA 14 (2007)
12. Bautista v. Bautista, G.R. No. 202088, March 2017

Notice of Lis Pendens

Rule 19, Sec 19

1. AFP Mutual Benefit Association INc. v. CA, G.R. No. 104769, March 3, 2000
2. Heirs of Lopez, Sr. v. Enriquez, G.R. No. 146262

VII. MOTIONS
Rule 15
Rule 133, Sec. 7
B.P. Blg 129 (1980), Sec 16

1. Cruz v. CA, 388 SCRA 72 (2002)

2. KKK Foundation, Inc. v. Bargas, 541 SCRA 432 (2007)
3. Aneco Realty Development Corporation v. Landex Development Corporation, 560 SCRA
182 (2008)
4. Metrobank v. Abad Santos, 608 SCRA 222 (2009) SUPRA
5. Delos Reyes v. Josephine Anne R. Ramnani, G.R. No. 169135, June 18 2010
6. Preysler v. Manila Southcoast Dev. Corp, G.R. No. 171872, June 28 2010
7. Dela Pena v. Dela Pena, 258 SCRA 298 (1996)
8. Sarmiento v. Zaratan, G.R. No. 167471, February 5, 2007
9. PNB v. Deang Marketing Corp., G.R. No. 177931, December 8. 2008
10. Areza v. Express Savings Bank G.R. No. 176697, September 10, 2014
11. Microsoft Corp. v. Farajallah, G.R. No. 205800, September 10, 2014

VIII. OBJECTIONS TO PLEADINGS

A. Affirmative Defense in the Answer or Motion to Dismiss
1. Motion to Dismiss
Rule 15, Secs 5, 12, 13
1. Borje v. CFI of Hon. CFI of Misamis Occidental, 88 SCRA 576 (1979)
2. Spouses Barraza v. Campos, Jr., 120 SCRA 881 (1983) SUPRA
3. Spouses Anunciacion v. Bocanegra, G.R. No. 152496, July 30, 2009
4. Panganiban v. Pilipinas Shell Corp., 395 SCRA 624 (2003)
5. Capiral v. Robles, 660 SCRA 255 (2011)

2. Procedure on motion to dismiss

Rule 15, Secs 9, 12-13
1. Malicdem v. Flores, 501 SCRA 248 (2006)
2. California and Hawaiian Sugar Co. v. Pioneer Insurance, 346 SCRA 214 (2000) SUPRA
3. Misamis Occidental II Cooperatibe Inc. v. David, 468 SCRA 63 (2005)
4. Sps. Rasdas vs. Estenor, G.R. No. 157605, December 13, 2005

12
 5. Tan v. Tan, G.R. No. 167139, February 25, 2010
6. Aldersgate College, Inc. v. Gauuan, G.R. No. 192951, November 14 2012

B. Grounds
1. Want of Jurisdiction
Rule 6, Sec 5
Rule 8, Sec 12
Rule 15, Sec 12
1. US v. Ruiz, G.R. No. L-35645, May 22, 1985
2. Andaya v. Abadia, 228 SCRA 705 (1993)
3. DAR v. Abdulwahid, 547 SCRA 30 (2008)
4. Padlan v. Dinglasan, G.R. No. 180321, March 20 2013

2. Improper Venue
Rule 8, Sec 12
1. Republic v. Glasgow, 542 SCRA 95 (2008)
2. Universal Robina Corp. v. Lim, G.R. No. 154338, October 5, 20017 SUPRA

3. Want of legal capacity to sue

Rule 8, Sec 12
1. Evangelista v. Santiago, 457 SCRA 744 (2005(
2. Galindo v. Heirs of Roxas, G.R. No. 147969, January 17, 2005
4. Litis pendentia
Rule 6, Sec 5
Rule 15, Sec 12
1. Ramos v. Peralta, 203 SCRA 412 (1991)
2. Arceo v. Oliveros, 134 SCRA 308 (1985)
3. Buan v. Lope, Jr., 145 SCRA 34 (1986)
4. Investors Finance Corporation v. Ebarle, 163 SCRA 60 (1988)
5. Dotmatrix Trading v. Legaspi, 604 SCRA 431 (2009)
6. Benedicto v. Lacson, 620 SCRA 82 (2010)

5. Res Judicata and statute of limitations

Rule 6, Sec 5
Rule 15, Secs 12-13
Rule 39, Sec 47
1. Opreza Marketing Corp. v. Allied Banking Corp., 393 SCRA 278 (2002)
2. Avisado v. Rumbaua, 354 SCRA 245 (2001)
3. Arreza v. Diaz, 364 SCRA 88 (2001)
4. Francisco v. Co., 481 SCRA 241 (2006)
5. Cruz v. CA, 482 SCRA 379 (2006)
6. GSIS v. Group Management Corp. G.R. No. 167000, June 8 2011
7. Chu v. Sps. Cunanan, G.R. No. 156185, September 12, 2011

Cf. “Law of the case”

13
 1. Litton Mills, Inc. v. Galleon Trader, INc. 163 SCRA 489 (1998)
2. Ayala Corporation v. Rosa-Diana Realty & Development Corp, 346 SCRA 663 (2000)

Statute of Limitations

1. Pascual v. CA, 409 SCRA 105 (2003)

2. Manila Bankers Life Insurance Corp. v. Aban, G.R. No. 175666, July 29, 2013
3. Cua v. Wallem Phils. Shipping Inc. G.R. No. 171337, July 11 2012

6. Insufficient Allegations
Rule 8, Sec 12
1. Flour Daniel, Inc. Philippines v. E.B. Villarosa & Partners Co., Ltd., 528 SCRA 321
(2007)
2. Domondon v. Lopez, 383 SCRA 376 (2002)
3. Vitangcol v. New Vista Properties, Inc. G.R. No 176014, September 17 2009
4. Unicapital, Inc. v. Consing, Jr. G.R. 175277, September 11 2013
5. Dabuco vs. CA 322 SCRA 853 (2000)

7. Payment, waiver, abandonment or extinction

Rule 6, Sec 5
Rule 15, Sec 13
1. Laches – cf. Pineda v. Heirs of Guevara 515 SCRA 627 (2007)
8. Statute of frauds
Rule 6, Sec 5
Rule, Sec 13
1. Swedish Match v. CA, G.R. No. 128120, October 20 2004
9. Non-compliance with a condition precedent for filing
Rule 8, Sec 12
CIVIL CODE, Art 222
1. Guerrero v. RTC of Ilocos, 229 SCRA 274 (1194)
2. Heirs of Favis, Sr. v Gonzales, G.R. No. 185922, January 15 2014
10. Lack of certification against forum shopping
Rule 7, Sec 5

C. Motion to suspend proceedings

Rule 15, Sec 12 – General Rule
1. Need for prior arbitration
1. Bengson v. Chan, 78 SCRA 113 (1977)
2. Need for prior reference to barangay conciliation
3. Rule 30, Sec 8

D. Motion for bill of particulars

Rule 12
Rule 15, Sec 5

14
 1. Bantillo v Intermediate Appelate Court, 166 SCRA 508 (1988)
2. Virata v. Sandiganbayan 221 SCRA 52 (1993)

E. Motion to drop/add parties

Rule 3, Sec 11

F. Motion to sever cause of action

Rule 2, Sec 6

G. Motion to strike out

Rule 8, Sec 13
Rule 7, Sec 3
Rule 12, Sec 4
Rule 29, Sec 3(c)

H. Motion for judgement on the pleadings

Rule 34
Rule 18, Sec 10
1. GSIS v. Prudential Guarantee and Assurance, G.R. 165585, November 20 2013
2. Municipality of Tiwi v. Betito, G.R. No 171873, July 9 2010
3. Tan v. Dela Vega, G.R. No. 168809, March 10 2006
4. Adolfo v. Adolfo G.R. No. 201427, March 18 2015

I. Motion for summary judgement/ accelerated judgement

Rule 35
Rule 18, Sec 10
1. Estrada v. Consolacion, 71 SCRA 523 (1976)
2. Nocom v. Camerino, 578 SCRA 390 (2009)
3. Wood Technology Corp v. Equitable Bank, G.R. No. 153867, Feb 17 2005
4. Botanga v. Pyramid Construction Engineering Corp., 563 SCRA 544 (2008)
5. Calubaquib v. Republic, G.R. No. 170658, June 22 2011
6. YKR Corp. v. Philippine Agri-Business Center Corp., G.R. No 191838, October 20, 2014
7. Philippine Bank of Communications v. Spouses Go, 642 SCRA 693 (2011)

IX. DISMISSALS AND DEFAULTS

A. Dismissals
Rule 17
1. Republic Planters Bank v. Molina, 166 SCRA 39 (1988)
2. Pinga v. Heirs of Santiago, 494 SCRA 393 (2006)
3. BPI v. CA 303 SCRA 19 (1999)
4. Quintos v. Nicolas, G.R. No. 210252, June 16, 2014
5. Samson vs. Fiel-Macaraig, G.R. No. 166366, February 2 2010
6. Eloisa Merchandisikng, Inc. vs. Banco de Oro, G.R. No. 192716, June 13 2012
7. Ching vs Cheng, G.R. No 175507, Oct 8 2014

15
 B. Defaults
Rule 9, Sec 3
1. Co. v. Acosta, 134 SCRA 185 (1985)
2. Lina v. CA 135 SCRA 637 (1985)
3. Boticano v. Chu Jr. 148 SCRA 541 (1987)
4. Denso (Phils.) Inc. v IAC, 148 SCRA 280 (1987)
5. De Los Santos v. Carpio, 501 SCRA 390 (2006)
6. Crisologo v. Globe Telecom, 472 SCRA 433 (2005)

X. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
A. Notice of lis pendens
Rule 13, Sec 19
P.D. No. 1529 (1978) as amended, Secs 76 and 77
CIVIL CODE, Art 1381 (4)
1. Po Lam v. Court of Appeals, 347 SCRA 86 (2000)

Cf. Notice of adverse claim

Pres. Decree No. 1529 (1978), as amended, Sec 70

1. Sajonas v. Court of Appeals, 258 SCRA 79 (1996)

B. Preliminary attachment
Ru;e 57
Civil Code, Art 1387
1. Philippine British Assurance Co., Inc. v IAC, 150 SCRA 520 (1987)
2. International Container Terminal Services, Inc. v. CA, 214 SCRA 456 (1992) – SUPRA
3. Davao Light and Power Co., v. CA, 204 SCRA 343 (1991) – SUPRA
4. Mangila v. CA, 387 SCRA 15 (2002) – SUPRA
5. Mindanao Savings & Loan Association, Inc., v. CA, G.R. No 84481, April 18, 1989
6. Adlawan v. Torres, 233 SCRA 645 (1994)
7. Phil. Bank Communications v. CA, G.R. No. 115678, 352 SCRA 616 (2001)
8. Wee v Tankiansee, 345 SCRA 263 (2008)
9. Borja v. Lanzanas, 73 Phil 659 (1942)
10. BSP v. Lanzanas, 637 SCRA 475 (2010)
11. PCIB v. Alejandro, 533 SCRA 738 (2007) – SUPRA
12. Security Pacific Assurance v. Tria-Infante, 468 SCRA 526 (2005)
13. Carlos v. Sandoval, 471 SCRA 266 (2005)
14. China Banking Corp. v. Asian Construction and Dev’t Corp., 550 SCRA 585 (2008)
15. Ching v CA, 423 SCRA 356 (2004)

C. Preliminary Injunction
Rule 58
A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC (Amending Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65), December 4, 2007
R.A. No. 8975 (2000), Secs 3 and 4

16
 Administrative Circular No. 11-2000 re: Ban on the Insurance of TRO or Write of
Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunction in cases involving government infrastructure
projects (November 13, 2000)
R.A. No, 9136 (2001), Sec 78
1. Brocka v. Enrile, 192 SCRA 183 (1990)
2. SJS v. Atienza, 545 SCRA 92 (2008)
3. Philippine Ports Authority v. Pier 8 Arrastre, 475 SCRA 426 (2005)
4. City Gov’t of Butuan v. Consolidated Broadcasting System (CBS), Inc. 636 SCRA 320
(2010)
5. Manila International Airport Authority v. Powergen, Inc. 344 SCRA 521 (2008)
6. NEA v. Villanueva 614 SCRA 80 (2010)
7. Universal Motors v. Judge Rojas, A.M. No. RTJ-03-1814, May 26, 2005
8. Borromeo v. CA, G.R. No. 169846, March 28, 2008
9. Spouses Yap v. International Exchange Bank, G.R. No. 175145, March 28, 2008
10. G.G. Sportswear v. BDO, G.R. No. 184434, February 8, 2010
11. Spouses Lago v. Judge Abul, A.M. RTJ-10-2255, January 17, 2011
12. Nerwin v. PNOC, G.R. No. 167057, April 11 2012
13. Honteveros-Baraquel v. Toll Regulatory Board, G.R. No. 181293, February 23, 2015
14. Crisologo v. Omelio, A.M. No. RTJ-12-2321, October 3, 2012
15. Recto v. Escaler, 634 SCRA 180 (2010)
16. Ngo v. Allied Bank, 632 SCRA 391 (2010)
17. Australian Professional Realty v. Municipality of Padre Garcia, 668 SCRA 253 (2012)
18. Spouses Castro v. Spouses Dela Cruz, 639 SCRA 187 (2011)

D. Receivership
Rule 59
1. Vivares v. Reyes, 545 SCRA 80 (2008)
2. Chavez v. CA, 610 SCRA 399 (2010)
3. Descallar v. CA, 224 SCRA 566 (1993)
4. Pacific Merchandising Corp v. Consolacion Insurance & Surety Co., 73 SCRA 564 (1976)
5. Commodities Storage & Ice Plant Corp v. 274 SCRA 439 (1997)

E. Replevin
Rule 60
1. Vda De Danao v. Ginete, 395 SCRA 542 (2003)
2. Bautista v. Sula, 530 SCRA 406 (2007)
3. Fernandez v. International Corp. Bank, G.R. No. 148132, January 28, 2008
4. Sebastian v. Valino, A.M. No. P-91-549, July 5, 1993
5. Servicewide Specialists v. CA, 258 SCRA 102 (1996)
6. Sapugay v. CA, 183 SCRA 464 (1990)
7. Advent Capital Corp. v. Young 655 SCRA 118 (2011)
8. Asian Terminals v. Bautista, 5005 SCRA 748 (2006)

F. Support pendent lite

17
 Rule 61
A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC (Rules on Provisional Orders), March 4, 2003
1. Lam v. Chua, 426 SCRA 29 (2004)
2. Gan v. Reyes, G.R. No. 145527, May 28, 2002
3. San Juan v. Valenzuela, 117 SCRA 926 (1982)
4. Reyes v. Ines-Luciano, 88 SCRA 803 (1979)
5. Calderon v. Roxas, G.R. No. 185595, January 9 2013

G. Anti-Violence Against Women and Children Rules on TPO/PPO

Rep. Act. No. 9262 (2004), Secs 7-8, 15-18
IRR of Rep. Act No. 9262 (2004), Rule III, Sec 10, Rule IV, Secs 11-12, 17-24
A.M. No. 04-10-11-SC, October 19 2004
1. Rua v. Mangrobang, G.R. No. 170701, January 22 2014
2. Ocampo v. Arcaya-Chua, A.M OCA IPI No. 07-2630-RTJ, April 23 2010

XI. DISCOVERY
A. Generally
1. Republic v. Sandiganbayan, 204 SCRA 212 (1991)

B. Depositions
Rules 23-24
A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC (Guidelines in the Conduct of Pre-trial and Use of Deposition-
Discover Measures)
1. Fortune Corporation v. Court of Appeals, 229 SCRA 355 (1994)
2. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Cruz, 317 SCRA 761 (1999)
3. Koh v. IAC, 144 SCRA 259 (1986)
4. Rosete v. Lim, 490 SCRA 125 (2006)
5. Manguerra v. Risos, 563 SCRA 499 (2008) – SUPRA

C. Interrogations to parties
Rule 25
1. Santiago Land Development Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 103922, July 9 1996

D. Request for admissions

Rule 26
1. Briboneria v. CA, 216 SCRA 607 (1992)
2. Duque v. CA, 383 SCRA 520 (2002)
3. Allied Agri-Business Dev. Co. v. CA, 167 SCRA 414 (1998)
4. Lanada v. CA, G.R. No. 102390, Feb 1, 2002

E. Production or inspection of documents or things

Rule 27
1. Air Phil. Corp. v. Pennswell, Inc. 540 SCRA 215 (2007)
2. Solidbank v. Gateway Electronics Corp., G.R. No. 164805, April 30 2008

18
 3. Eagle Ridge Development Corp. v. Cameron Granville 3 Asset Management, G.R. No.
204700, November 24 2014
4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. San Miguel Corp, G.R. No. 205045, January 25,
2017

F. Physical and mental examination of persons

Rule 28

G. Sanctions for refusal to make discovery

Rule 29
1. Lopez v. Maceren, 95 Phil 753 (1954)
2. Fortune Corporation v. Court of Appeals, 229 SCRA 355 (1994)—SUPRA
3. Zepada v. China Banking Corp., 504 SCRA 126 (2006)
XII. PRE-TRIAL
Rule 18
AM. No. 03-1-09-SC (Guidelines in the Conduct of Pre-trial and Use of Deposition Discover
Measures)
1. Paranaque Kings Enterprises v. Santos, G.R. No. 194638, July 2 2014
2. Philippine Ports Authority v. City of Iloilo, G.R. No. 109791, July 14, 2003
3. Alarcon v. CA, 323 SCRA 716 (2000)
4. Tropical Homes Inc v. Villaluz, G.R. No. L-40628, February 24 1989
5. Saguid v. CA, G.R. 150611, June 10 2003
6. Tolentino v. Laurel, G.R. No. 181368, February 22, 2012
7. Philippines Export and Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. Amalgamated Management &
Dev’t Corp, 658 SCRA 273 (2011)
8. Real Bank v. Samsung Mabuhay Corp, 633 SCRA 124 (2010)
9. Chingkoe v. Republic, G.R. 183608, July 31 2013
10. Son vs Son, G.R. No. 73077, December 29, 1995
11. Corpuz v. Citibank, GR. No. 175677 July 31 2009
12. Kent v. Micarez, G.R. No 185758, March 9 2011
13. Licomcen, Inc. v. Abainza, 691 SCRA 158 (2013)
14. Aguilar v. Lightbringers Credit Cooperative, G.R. No. 209605 12January 2015
15. Spouses Salvador v. Spouses Rabaja, G.R. No. 199990, February 4 2015
A. When conducted Rule 18, Sec 1
1. Samson v. Fiel=Macaraig, 611 SCRA 345 (2010) –SUPRA

B. Nature and purpose

Rule 18, Sec 2
1. Tiu v. Middleton 310 SCRA 580 (1999)
2. Toshiba Information Equipment, Inc. v. Commissioner on Internal Revenue, 614 SCRA
526 (2010)

C. Pre-trial brief
Rule 18, Sec 6

19
 AM No. 03-1-09-SC, July 13 2004
1. De Agatep v. Rodriguez, 604 SCRA 634 (2009)

D. Appearance of parties
Rule 18, Secs 4 and 5
Rule 17, Sec 3
Rule 9, Sec 3

E. Procedure
Rule 18, Sec 1,3,6,7 and 10
Rule 9, Sec 3
1. Philippine Trasmarine Carrier, Inc. v. CA, 326 SCRA 18 (2000)
2. Citibank N.A. v. Chua, 220 SCRA 75 (1993)0
3. LCK Industries Inc. v. Planters Development Bank, 538 SCRA 634 (2007)
4. United Coconut Planters Bank v. Magpayo, 429 SCRA 669 (2004

F. Court Annexed Mediation and Judicial Dispute Resolution

Rule 18, Secs 8-9
Rep. Act No. 9285 (2004)
A.M No. 11-1-6-SSC-PHILJA, January 11 2011

G. May be waived?
Spouses Martinez v. Judge dela Merced, G.R. No. 82039, June 20 1989
Madrid v. Mapoy, G.R. No. 150889, August 14 2009
XIII. TRIAL
A. Calendar and assignment of cases
Rule 20
Rule 135, Sec 1
B.P. Blg. 129 (1980), Sec 16
1. Ang Kek Chen v. Bello, G.R. Nos. L-16344-46 June 30, 1988 (2 cases ata. please check)

B. Trial
Rule 30 and 31
Rule 135, Secs 2 and 7
Rule 136, Secs 6 and 17
Admin. Circular 3-39, January 15 1999
1. Laluan v. Malpaya, 65 SCRA 494 (1975)
2. Continental Bank v. Tiangco, 94 SCRA 715 (1979)
3. Republic v. Sandiganbayan, 662 SCRA 152 (2011)
4. Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company v. Sandoval, G.R. No 169677, February 18, 2013
5. Republic v. Heirs of Oribello, Jr. 692 SCRA 645 (2013)

C. Trial by commissioner
Rule 32

20
 1. Wassmer v. Velez, 12 SCRA 618 (1964)

D. Subpoena
Rule 21
Rule 135, Sec 5 (e)
Rule 141, Sec 14B.P. Blg. 129 (1980), Sec 38 (2)
1. Universal Rubber Products, Inc. v. CA, 130 SCRA 104 (1984)
2. People v. Montejo, 21 SCRA 722 (1967)
3. Genorga v. Quitain, 78 SCRA 94 (1977)

E. Demurer to evidence
Rule 33
1. Radiowealth Finance Co. v. Del Rosario, 335 SCRA 288 (2000)
2. Choa v. Choa 392 SCRA 641 (2002)
3. Nepomuceno v. Comelec, 126 SCRA 472 (1983)
4. Casent Realty Development v. Philbanking Corp., G.R. No. 150731, September 14, 2007
5. Uy v. Chua, G.R. No. 183965, September 18 2009
6. Domondon v. Lopez, 383 SCRA 376 (2002) – SUPRA
7. Republic v. Juan Tuvera, 516 SCRA 113 (2007)

XIV. JUDGMENTS
1. Lacurom v. Judge Tienzo, A.M. No. RTJ-07-2075, October 9, 2007
2. Mangelen v. CA 2015 SCRA 230 (1992)
3. Barrazona v. RTC Br. 61, 486 SCRA 555 (2006)
4. Barrera v. Militante, 114 SCRA 323 (1982)
5. Echaus v. CA, 187 SCRA 672 (1990)
6. Sumbilla v. Matrix Finance Corp., G.R. No. 197582, June 29 2015
7. Delfino v. Anasao, G.R. No. 197846, September 10 2014
8. Club Filipino, Inc. v. Bautista, G.R. No. 168406, January 2015
9. DBP v. Guarina Agricultural and Realty Development Corp., G.R. No. 160758, January 15
2014
10. Commercial Union Assurance Company v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining, 86 SCRA 79
(1978)
11. Filipinas Palmoil Processing v. Dejap, 641 SCRA 572 (2011)
12. Salting v. Velez, 639 SCRA 124 (2011)
13. Silverio v. Filipino Business Consultants, 466 SCRA 584 (2005)
14. Castro v. Malazo, 99 SCRA 324 (1989)
15. Francisco v. Permskul, 173 SCRA 324 (1989)

A. Judgments on the merits

Rule 36
Rule 135, Sec 9
Rule 136, Sec 9
Const., Art VIII, Sec 14, 15

21
 B.P. Blg 129 (1980), Secs 38 (1) and 40

B. Judgment by compromise
1. California Manufacturing Compnay, Inc. v. City of Las Pinas, et al, G.R. No. 178461,
June 22 2009
2. Philippines National Bank v. Banatao, et al, G.R. No. 149221, April 7 2009

C. Judgment by confession
Family Code, Art 48
1. Philippine National Bank v. Manila Oil Refining & By-Products Company, Inc. 43 Phil 444
(1922)

D. Nunc pro tunc judgements

1. Lichauco v. Tan Pho, 51 Phil. 862 (1923)
2. Briones-Vazquez v. CA 450 SCRA 482 (2005)

E. Judgment for costs

Rule 142

F. Declaratory judgments
Rule 63
1. Baguio Citizens Action Inc. v. City Council, 121 SCRA 368 (1983)
2. Matalin Coconut Co., Inc. v. Mun. Council of Malabang, Lanao del Sur, 143 SCRA 404
(1986)
3. reyes v. Ortiz, 628 SCRA 1 (2010)
4. Gomez v. Palomar, 25 SCRA 827 (1968)
5. Almeda v. Bathala Marketing Ind., 542 SCRA 470 (2008)
6. Monetary Board v. Philippine Veterans Bank, G.R. No. 189571, January 21 2015
7. Kawasaki Port Service Corp. v Amores 199 SCRA 230 (1991)
8. DBM v. Manila’s Finest 523 SCRA 90 (2007)
9. Gamboa v. Secretary of Finance, 652 SCRA 690 (2011)
10. Phil-Ville Development v. Bonifacio v. Bonifacio 651 SCRA 327 (2011)

G. Foreign Judgments
Rule sec 48

22