Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a
Yuliang Xie and Chenglong Zhao *b,c
Under laser illumination, a solid-state surface or nanostructure can turn into a micro/nano heating source
with the so-called optothermal effect. This effect allows for non-invasive control of heat at the micro/
nanoscale. In the presence of a liquid, a surface bubble can be generated on top of the solid surface or
nanostructure at a temperature much higher than the boiling point of the liquid. The high temperature
Received 23rd February 2017, and the fluid flow associated with the optothermally generated surface bubble enable many intriguing
Accepted 14th April 2017
applications, ranging from the micro/nano-manipulation of fluids, particles, cells, and light to the
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr01360d synthesis of micro/nano-structures under ambient conditions. In this review article, we present the funda-
rsc.li/nanoscale mentals, recent developments, and future perspectives in this emerging field.
b
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA even femtoseconds6 without changing the contents of the
Department of Physics, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469,
liquid solution, thanks to the enhanced absorption on the
USA. E-mail: czhao1@udayton.edu
c
Department of Electro-Optics and Photonics, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, surface or nanostructures. Once the OGSB is formed on the
Dayton, OH 45469, USA surface, its position and size on the surface can be remotely
6622 | Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
Nanoscale Review
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 | 6623
View Article Online
Review Nanoscale
beam where the heating area is diffraction-limited, illuminating as water, by the OGSB. The temperature can be high enough to
a plasmonic nanostructure with a laser beam can confine the evaporate the GNP as has been observed by Setoura et al.21
heat at the nanoscale. Baffou et al. have studied the heating and Actually, the heating on the GNPs and the precise measure-
OGSB formation on plasmonic nanoparticles such as gold ment of the temperature is another important and interesting
nanoparticles (GNPs).19 The benefits of using GNPs for the for- topic. For example, nano-heating around GNPs has been used
mation of OGSB are as follows: (1) the size and shape of the for ultrasensitive molecular detection22 and heat-up synthesis
GNPs can be precisely designed to optimize the heat generation, under ambient conditions.23 We refer the readers to ref. 24–28
especially under the resonant conditions; (2) the GNPs are for more detailed discussions on this topic.
chemically stable and well-known catalysts for many chemical The plasmonic nanostructures can also be formed into
reactions; (3) GNPs serve as ideal nano-heating sources. arrays for the generation of OGSB. Two distinct heating
Fig. 2(a) schematically shows an OGSB on GNPs with cw regimes have been evidenced6 in the case of cw illumination.
Published on 18 April 2017. Downloaded by HKUST Library on 12/2/2022 10:47:41 AM.
illumination. The temperature distribution around a single In the first regime, the temperature is still well confined near
GNP measured with quadriwave shearing interferometry the nanostructures. In the second regime, the temperature
(TIQSI) is shown in Fig. 2(b). Note that heat is mainly confined stays uniform across the nanostructure arrays despite the
to the GNP and the temperature drops quickly away from the small size of the nanostructures. A dimensionless parameter
GNP. Fig. 2(c) shows the maximum temperature as a function ζ2 = p2/3LR has been proposed to distinguish these two
of the ratio of Pl/D, where Pl is the laser power at the sample regimes, where p is the nanostructure distance, L is the charac-
and D is the beam diameter. Interestingly, Baffou et al.19 teristic size of the illuminated area, and R is the radius of the
pointed out that the temperature required to generate an nanostructure. The temperature on a single nanostructure is
OGSB from the GNPs is independent of the size of the heating not affected by the nearby particles if ζ2 ≫ 1. In contrast, the
area. The formation of the OGSB is not a function of solely the temperature on each nanostructure is extended and smoothed
laser intensity as one may intuitively suppose, rather it is deter- all over the arrays in the case of ζ2 ≪ 1.
mined solely by the quantity Pl/D. The lifetime of the OGSB,
i.e. the time taken for the OGSB to disappear from the start, is 2.3 Temperature and flow distribution around the OGSB
also investigated. Fig. 2(d) shows the OGSB lifetime as a func- A temperature gradient and convective flow can be formed
tion of its initial diameter. Its lifetime is proportional to its around the OGSB. Fig. 3(a) shows the simulation of the temp-
initial volume. More recently, Setoura et al. studied the OGSB erature distribution around an OGSB. The temperature
on a single GNP.20 decreases along the radial direction because of convective
It should be noted that the temperature of the GNP cooling along the top and bottom surfaces. The corresponding
changes dramatically after the formation of the OGSB due to
the isolation of the GNP from the surrounding medium, such
6624 | Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
Nanoscale Review
convective flow caused by this temperature gradient is shown the experiment. The laser then passes through a half wave
in Fig. 3(b). Water first flows toward the bubble along the plate (HWP) and a polarizing beamsplitter (PBS) for continu-
bottom surface of the chamber, then moves upward to the top ous attenuation of the laser power. Finally, the heating laser is
surface, and finally flows away along the top surface of the coupled into the microscope from the beamsplitter inside the
chamber. This convective flow can be used to exert forces on microscope. A power meter (PM) can be placed at the other
particles suspended in the solution, which is important for end of the PBS to monitor the real-time power without disturb-
particle manipulation, cell deforming, cell poration and lysis ing the optical path. The laser power at the heating area
as will be discussed in section 3. (sample surface) can be calibrated and calculated by knowing
the rotating angle of the HWP and the power measured by the
2.4 Optical configuration for the generation of OGSB PM.
Modifications can be readily made on this configuration
Published on 18 April 2017. Downloaded by HKUST Library on 12/2/2022 10:47:41 AM.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 | 6625
View Article Online
Review Nanoscale
6626 | Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
Nanoscale Review
OGSB can be formed.35 For an asymmetric OGSB, the fluid 3.4 Cell poration and lysis
flow pushed by the large head side is faster than that pushed The expansion and collapsing of the OGSB also induces a
by the small tail side. As a result, the net fluid flow is in the strong micro-jetting flow, which can temporarily rupture the
large head side, which makes it function effectively as a micro- membrane of cells and facilitate external drugs or genes to
pump inside a microchannel as shown in Fig. 6(f ). The transfer across the cell membrane. This process was named
pumping rate ranging from 100 to 400 mm s−1 can be con- cell poration. Compared to virus or chemical based cell pora-
trolled effectively by adjusting the laser power. tion, OGSB based cell poration enhances biosafety without the
use of external chemicals or microbes. More importantly, this
3.3 Deformation of nanowires and cells method allows for single-cell poration.
The OGSB experiences rapid expansion, shrinking, or collap- Fan et al.3,4 have demonstrated the poration of cell mem-
Published on 18 April 2017. Downloaded by HKUST Library on 12/2/2022 10:47:41 AM.
sing that depends on the laser power. During this process, the branes of localized single NIH/3T3 fibroblasts with an oscillat-
OGSB creates a short-lived radial flow within a microfluidic ing OGSB as shown in Fig. 8(a). A focused laser beam creates
chamber that moves first outward during the bubble expan- an OGSB that oscillates on an absorbing substrate in a fluidic
sion and then inward during the bubble collapsing. This tran- chamber. The shear stress induced by the OGSB oscillation
sient flow provides a strong shear force that can be used to allows for the poration of nearby cells. Cell poration is demon-
deform materials such as nanowires and cells that are adjacent strated with the delivery of FITC–dextran dye of various mole-
to the bubble. The deformation of materials with the OGSB cular weights (Fig. 8(b)). Under optimal poration conditions,
has the following advantages: (1) high throughput: tens or the cell poration efficiency was up to 95.2 ± 4.8%, while main-
even hundreds of objects, such as cells or nanowires, can be taining 97.6 ± 2.4% cell viability as shown in Fig. 8(c).
targeted and measured by the OGSB simultaneously; (2) in situ A unique feature of this system is the capability of single-cell
measurement: this method does not require a bulk phase flow poration without disturbing surrounding cells, which makes
to apply a shear force, the flow induced by the OGSB expansion this a promising technique for single-cell therapy. In addition,
and collapsing is localized. sufficient strong shear stress can cause cell lysis,37 which is
Quinto-Su et al.5 have used this method to characterize red important for analysis of intracellular contents.3,4
blood cell (RBC) rheology, where the recovery of cell shape Lukianova-Hleb et al.38 have used OGSBs on nanoparticles
after OGSB collapsing was recorded as shown in Fig. 7(a). to perform chemotherapy on cancer cells. With a co-cultured
The fast shape recovery indicated a high stiffness of the cell. normal (NOM9) and squamous cell carcinoma (HN31), they
This method was also tested by comparing the strain decay demonstrated that the OGSB can discriminate effectively
exponents of normal RBCs with those of RBCs treated with between cancer and normal cells under identical treatment
neuraminidase (NM) and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) as with nanoparticles and optical radiation. They found that
shown in Fig. 7(b). The WGA increases the RBCs’ stiffness, there is a higher threshold for the delivery of nanoparticles to
while NM impacts the overall surface charge on the RBSs and normal cells. The poration with OGSBs has shown high pora-
decreases the deformability. In another application,36 the tion ratio and transfer efficiency on a wide variety of cells.
Young’s modulus of a single Co nanowire was analyzed using
an OGSB. The restoring dynamics of a bent Co nanowire was 3.5 Light manipulation at the micro/nanoscale
captured with a high-speed camera. The Young’s modulus of Plasmonics, which studies the interactions between light and
the Co nanowire was found to be between 9.6 and 13.0 GPa, metallic nanostructures, has been a hot research topic for
which reveals a remarkable difference compared to its bulk decades. The surface plasmon (SP) or localized surface
counterpart (∼160 GPa). plasmon (LSP) on metallic nanostructures allows for the
control of light beyond the diffraction limit. Recently, there
Fig. 8 Single-cell poration with the OGSB. (a) DIC image of cells after
Fig. 7 (a) Red blood cells (RBCs) imaged before, during and after the the targeted single-cell poration. The dashed circle indicates the
bubble generation. (b) Extracted exponents n for the power law decay location of the OGSB. (b) The fluorescence image shows the success-
model of untreated RBCs and RBCs treated with NM and WGA, which fully porated target cell with no poration of the neighboring cells. (c)
depicts the differences in mechanical properties of each cell group. Cell poration efficiency and the resulting cell viability of FITC–dextran
Reprinted from ref. 5 with permission. Copyright (2011) The Royal molecules of various sizes. Reprinted from ref. 3 with permission.
Society of Chemistry. Copyright (2014) The Royal Society of Chemistry.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 | 6627
View Article Online
Review Nanoscale
has been increasing interest in the modulation of the plasmo- ponding simulation results. The authors claimed a modulation
nic field with the OGSB. depth of 18 dB using this method.
Zhao et al. presented the first demonstration of the Compared to the modulation of SPs with micro-sized
application of a micro-sized OGSB as an effective lens for SP OGSBs, the generation of nano-sized OGSB on plasmonic
modulation in a microfluidic environment, a so-called reconfi- nanostructures allows for the control of light and heat at the
gurable plasmofluidic lens.29 Fig. 9(a) schematically shows the nanoscale. Fang et al. have shown the LSP resonance change
working principle of the reconfigurable plasmofluidic lens. of a GNP due to the formation of an OGSB.40 A cw laser is
SPs on the gold film are launched from a curved grating and focused on a GNP that is immobilized on a glass substrate in a
focused at the focal position shown as a white dashed line in liquid chamber as schematically shown in Fig. 10(a). The for-
Fig. 9(b). A micro-sized OGSB is formed between the curved mation of an OGSB changes the refractive index of the
grating and the focal position on the water–gold interface, materials surrounding the GNP, which results in the shift of
Published on 18 April 2017. Downloaded by HKUST Library on 12/2/2022 10:47:41 AM.
which changes the effective refractive index of the SPs. its LSP resonance. Fig. 10(b) shows the LSP resonance of the
In addition, the size of the OGSB can be precisely controlled GNP that is immersed in air (black), water (blue) and the
by modulating the laser power. Therefore, it behaves as a OGSB (red), respectively. The LSP resonance of the GNP capsu-
tuneable lens for the SPs as shown in Fig. 9(c)–(e), where SPs lated in the OGSB is redshifted compared to that in air and
are collimated gradually as the bubble size decreases. blueshifted compared that in water. The authors interpret this
Recently, Gan et al. demonstrated a wide-range tunable observation as “resulting from a water vapor envelop surround-
plasmonic device based on an OGSB.39 Fig. 9(f ) schematically ing the nanoparticle”, which results in a decreased refractive
shows the working principle of such a device. The plasmonic index of the medium compared to that in water. As Baffou
device, which consists of an array of holes fabricated on a gold et al. later pointed out, the underlying physics of the OGSB on
film, is illuminated with a linearly polarized light. The size plasmonic nanostructures is more complex than this intuitive
and period of the holes determine the transmission spectrum assumption.19
of the plasmonic device due to SP excitation from the holes. Li et al.41 demonstrated another interesting application of
The transmission spectrum also depends on the refractive the OGSB for photoresistance switching of plasmonic nano-
index of the material on top of the gold film. Therefore, the pores as schematically shown in Fig. 10(c). A near infrared
generation of an OGSB on the plasmonic device changes the laser with a wavelength of 785 nm is used to excite the LSP
effective refractive index of SPs, which results in a large wave- resonance of a plasmonic nanocavity that is integrated with a
length shift in the transmission spectrum. The top panel in solid-state nanopore. A voltage is applied on the nanopore to
Fig. 9(g) shows the measured transmission spectrum of the measure the ionic current flowing through the nanopore. The
plasmonic device with (red curve) and without (black curve)
the OGSB. The bottom panel in Fig. 9(g) shows the corres-
6628 | Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
Nanoscale Review
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 | 6629
View Article Online
Review Nanoscale
place a real challenge in these applications. On the one hand, 8 A. Günther and K. F. Jensen, Lab Chip, 2006, 6, 1487–1503.
the high temperature around the OGSB may be used for cell 9 A. Hashmi, G. Yu, M. Reilly-Collette, G. Heiman and J. Xu,
ablation or surgery. But on the other hand, it may also cause Lab Chip, 2012, 12, 4216–4227.
severe damage to other cells. New technologies have to be 10 S. K. Chung, K. Rhee and S. K. Cho, Int. J. Precis. Eng.
developed to make the OGSB biocompatible. One possible Manuf., 2010, 11, 991–1006.
solution is separating the process of OGSB generation and 11 S. L. Anna, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2016, 48, 285–309.
its application. For example, Xie et al. have shown that the 12 T. Fu and Y. Ma, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2014, 135, 343–372.
actuation of the OGSBs with acoustic waves is a good way to 13 P. Garstecki, A. M. Gañán-Calvo and G. M. Whitesides,
maintain high biocompatibility of the OGSB.1 Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., 2005, 53, 361–372.
14 W. Hu, Q. Fan and A. T. Ohta, Rob. Biomimetics, 2014, 1, 14.
4.3 Multiple OGSBs and their interactions 15 W. Hu, Q. Fan and A. T. Ohta, Lab Chip, 2013, 13, 2285–
Published on 18 April 2017. Downloaded by HKUST Library on 12/2/2022 10:47:41 AM.
The current research focuses mostly on the study and appli- 2291.
cations of a single OGSB. Another interesting topic that is 16 L. Jiang and D. Erickson, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 11259–11264.
worth studying is the mechanism of OGSB interactions. For 17 M. Krishnan, J. Park and D. Erickson, Opt. Lett., 2009, 34,
example, multiple OGSBs can be generated simultaneously by 1976.
modulating the heating laser with a spatial light modulator or 18 C. A. Ward, P. Tikuisis and R. D. Venter, J. Appl. Phys.,
a diffractive optical element. The interactions between these 1982, 53, 6076–6084.
OGSBs may pave the way for manipulating fluid dynamics for 19 G. Baffou, J. Polleux, H. Rigneault and S. Monneret, J. Phys.
applications in microfluidics and micro/nano-manipulation. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 4890–4898.
20 K. Setoura, S. Ito and H. Miyasaka, Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 719–
4.4 Engineering the shape of the OGSB 730.
The OGSB is typically in a truncated spherical shape. The flex- 21 K. Setoura, Y. Okada and S. Hashimoto, Phys. Chem. Chem.
ible control of the OGSB shape is desperately needed for the Phys., 2014, 16, 26938–26945.
exploration of new applications of the OGSB. There are few 22 A. J. Green, A. A. Alaulamie, S. Baral and H. H. Richardson,
research studies on this topic. Zhao et al.29 have shown that Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 4142–4147.
the OGSB can be engineered in an elliptical or parabolic shape 23 H. M. L. Robert, F. Kundrat, E. Bermúdez-Ureña,
by dragging the OGSB with a laser beam. Engineering the wett- H. Rigneault, S. Monneret, R. Quidant, J. Polleux and
ability of the liquid–solid surface by either chemical treatment G. Baffou, ACS Omega, 2016, 1, 2–8.
or nanostructure fabrication is another possible solution to 24 S. Baral, A. J. Green, M. Y. Livshits, A. O. Govorov and
design the OGSB shape on a surface. H. H. Richardson, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 1439–1448.
25 H. H. Richardson, M. T. Carlson, P. J. Tandler, P. Hernandez
and A. O. Govorov, Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 1139–1146.
26 M. T. Carlson, A. Khan and H. H. Richardson, Nano Lett.,
Acknowledgements 2011, 11, 1061–1069.
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Hanley 27 M. T. Carlson, A. J. Green and H. H. Richardson, Nano
Sustainability Institute (HSI) and the summer research fellow- Lett., 2012, 12, 1534–1537.
ship at the University of Dayton. 28 K. Setoura, Y. Okada, D. Werner and S. Hashimoto, ACS
Nano, 2013, 7, 7874–7885.
29 C. Zhao, Y. Liu, Y. Zhao, N. Fang and T. J. Huang, Nat.
References Commun., 2013, 4, 2305.
30 Y. Zheng, H. Liu, Y. Wang, C. Zhu, S. Wang, J. Cao and
1 Y. Xie, C. Zhao, Y. Zhao, S. Li, J. Rufo, S. Yang, F. Guo and S. Zhu, Lab Chip, 2011, 11, 3816–3820.
T. J. Huang, Lab Chip, 2013, 13, 1772–1779. 31 W. Hu, K. S. Ishii, Q. Fan and A. T. Ohta, Lab Chip, 2012,
2 C. Zhao, Y. Xie, Z. Mao, Y. Zhao, J. Rufo, S. Yang, F. Guo, 12, 3821–3826.
J. D. Mai and T. J. Huang, Lab Chip, 2014, 14, 384–391. 32 L. Lin, X. Peng, Z. Mao, W. Li, M. N. Yogeesh, B. B. Rajeeva,
3 Q. Fan, W. Hu and A. T. Ohta, Lab Chip, 2014, 14, 1572– E. P. Perillo, A. K. Dunn, D. Akinwande and Y. Zheng, Nano
1578. Lett., 2016, 16, 701–708.
4 Q. Fan, W. Hu and A. T. Ohta, Lab Chip, 2015, 15, 581–588. 33 S. Fujii, K. Kanaizuka, S. Toyabe, K. Kobayashi,
5 P. a. Quinto-Su, C. Kuss, P. R. Preiser and C.-D. Ohl, Lab E. Muneyuki and M. Haga, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 8605–8610.
Chip, 2011, 11, 672–678. 34 S. Fujii, K. Kobayashi, K. Kanaizuka, T. Okamoto,
6 G. Baffou, P. Berto, E. Bermudez Urena, R. Quidant, S. Toyabe, E. Muneyuki and M. Haga, Chem. Lett., 2010, 39,
S. Monneret, J. Polleux and H. Rigneault, ACS Nano, 2013, 92–93.
7, 6478–6488. 35 K. Zhang, A. Jian, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Li and H. Tam, Lab
7 Y. Xie, S. Yang, Z. Mao, P. Li, C. Zhao, Z. Cohick, Chip, 2011, 11, 1389–1395.
P.-H. Huang and T. J. Huang, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 12175– 36 X. Huang, P. A. Quinto-Su, S. R. Gonzalez-Avila, T. Wu and
12184. C. D. Ohl, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 3846–3851.
6630 | Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
Nanoscale Review
37 A. N. Hellman, K. R. Rau, H. H. Yoon and V. Venugopalan, 41 Y. Li, F. Nicoli, C. Chen, L. Lagae, G. Groeseneken,
J. Biophotonics, 2008, 1, 24–35. T. Stakenborg, H. W. Zandbergen, C. Dekker, P. Van Dorpe
38 E. Y. Lukianova-Hleb, X. Ren, J. A. Zasadzinski, X. Wu and and M. P. Jonsson, Nano Lett., 2015, 15, 776–782.
D. O. Lapotko, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 3831–3837. 42 Y. Xie, N. Nama, P. Li, Z. Mao, P. H. Huang, C. Zhao,
39 F. Gan, Y. Wang, C. Sun, G. Zhang, H. Li, J. Chen and F. Costanzo and T. J. Huang, Small, 2015, 12, 902–
Q. Gong, Adv. Opt. Mater., DOI: 10.1002/adom.201600545. 910.
40 Z. Fang, Y. R. Zhen, O. Neumann, A. Polman, F. J. García 43 J. Van Embden, A. S. R. Chesman and J. J. Jasieniak, Chem.
De Abajo, P. Nordlander and N. J. Halas, Nano Lett., 2013, Mater., 2015, 27, 2246–2285.
13, 1736–1742. 44 S. Feng and R. Xu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 239–247.
Published on 18 April 2017. Downloaded by HKUST Library on 12/2/2022 10:47:41 AM.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 6622–6631 | 6631