Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anthropology
2. Anthropology and Colonialism
Anthropology’s Legacy
“…the outcome of a historical process which has made the larger part of
mankind subservient to the other, and during which millions of innocent
human beings have had their resources plundered and their institutions
and beliefs destroyed, whilst they themselves were ruthlessly killed, thrown
into bondage, and contaminated by diseases they were unable to resist.”
------ Claude Levi-Strauss
Do pharmaceutical
companies still engage in
‘colonial’ behaviour?
Scientific
Colonialism 2
The idea underlying this
term is that western
colonial powers were able
to build science and
technology on the back of
colonial exploitation. In so
doing they gained
advantages that enabled
those with power to
further exploit, and to
justify that exploitation by
claiming they were bringing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9SiRNib enlightenment and a better
D14 life to the colonised people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i80qaETt
w8
Scientific
Colonialism 3
A lack of language
recognised as ‘scientific’ was
perceived as evidence of
non-scientific thinking. Yet
The west assumed ownership of ‘natives’ often read
scientific knowledge by naming landscape, animal behaviour
and collecting specimens that and nature in a way no
were taken back to Europe for European could.
study, and as a claim of superior
appreciation.
Geographical
Determinism
Africans have been
described as prisoners of
geography because the
topography, climate, and
land did not allow different
groups of people to
communicate and exchange
ideas and technology.
Unlike much of the rest of
Old World, geography kept Hundreds of separate
people separated and languages also kept people
isolated. separate – only when
colonials introduced French
and English did a common
lingua franca emerge.
The different cultures of Africa
are vastly different from each
other, depending on location.
Cultural
Determinism
Western anthropology put
forward ideas that people
were backward, poor and
incapable to change from
within because their
cultures had conditioned a
particular way of thinking
and doing.