You are on page 1of 35

© 2015 PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS) all rights reserved.

No part of this document may be


reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owner
• HSE
Measurement tool to evaluate PACs compliance • Exploration
performance level • Development

12 Components
Production Operations
• SCM Governance
An indicator to recognize PACs through incentive or • Sub surface
impose Consequence Management (if necessary) • Finance
• Technical Data
• Training Commitment
A weightage is assigned to all components of which final • Drilling
• WP&B
score will determined PACs rating
• Malaysianisation
PDA Key Performance Measures
1) Agreed KPIs between MPM and
Contractors

+
2) Approved WPB
PSC
3) Monthly reports
4) Approved Production Target Letter & Gas
Planning Meeting
PPGUA
5) Audit Reports
6) Bi Annual Manpower Performance Report

PTS/OSR/TCAMUA/HSEMS/PMGU
Abbreviations:
A/RSC Guidelines/ PPMW
• PTS: PETRONAS Technical Standards
• OSR: Offshore Self-Regulation
• TCAMUA: Tender & Contracts Administrative Manual for Upstream
Operations
• HSEMS: HSE Management System
4 • PMGUA: PETRONAS Malaysianisation Guideline for Upstream Activities
Component Sub-Component • Non-Cost Recoverable Expenditure
• Procedural Findings
• HSE Incidents and performance YTD • Recurring Issue
HSE • HSE Legal Violation • Compliance to Provision Production Sharing Accounts
Finance
• Produce Water and Effluent discharge Adjustment (PPAA)
• Incident Notification and Performance Reporting • PSC Fiscal & Financial Terms
• Submission Date
• Format Compliance
• Well
Exploration • Seismic Acquisition & Processing Technical
• Other G&G acquisition/studies • Data Submission
Data
• FDP
• Post Drilling Report (PDR) Training • Training Commitment
Development • FFR (applicable to RE only) Commitment
• Appraisal wells
• PSC Commitment within Development Period
• Project Implementation • Exploration Drilling
Drilling • Development Drilling
Production • Production • Workover
Operations • Measurement
• Facilities Integrity & Reliability
• ABR submitted with partner’s approval
• Sourcing Governance • ABR submitted after Technical Discussion held with
SCM WPB
• Procurement Planning Governance respective MPM line departments
Governance • Materials Governance • ABR submitted before commencement of the activity.

• Reservoir Management • PSC Annual Organisation Chart


Sub Surface • Well Management M’sianisation
• Malaysianisation Targets
• Technical Potential
Indicator 1 Total score will be
Sub- tabulated at the end.
Component 1 Indicator 2 Final score will be
classified as :
Indicator 3
COMPONENT

Good

Indicator 1 Fair
Sub-
Component 2
Indicator 2
Unsatisfactory

Indicator 1 Poor

Sub-
Component 3 Indicator 2

Indicator 3
Exploration component

c b a

Rating Calculation Formula Sample Calculation

1.38
= 1. 1.38 * 15% = 0.22
1. a
* b c

2. Sum of C = d 2. 0.60+0.22+0.39+…..
2.75 0.16 = 2.35

3. d = CCI Rating 3. 2.35 = CCI Rating

d
Sample of CCI result shared with PACs
PAC A’s CCI ranking among
ALL PACs
a PAC A’s overall CCI rating: 1.96, ‘Good’.
1.29
Poor
4.00 3.95
b c
3.50 Peer Average by CCI Components PAC A
3.03 3.00 2.94
3.00 2.56 2.65
2.50 2.04
2.22
2.082.00 PAC A 1.96
1.96 d
2.00 1.85
1.68 1.62 1.73 e
1.60 1.58
1.50 2.49
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
PAC A’s CCI ranking among
0.50 Production PACs
Good
0.00
1.49
HSE

Exploration

Development

SCM
Drilling

Malaysianisation

Production
WPB

Finance

Training Comm
PAC A 1.96

2.49

Result Analysis
a Component A b Component B c Component C d Component D e Component E

• 1 Fatality case recorded


• Number of Loss Time • Comply to the
ABR submitted after Delay in Seismic acquisition approved M-Target
Injury exceed PAC’s KPI
activity start and without - will only start in Jan’16 Exceed Crude Production
target
Technical discussion. instead of planned in 2015. • Good performance of target
• Minor oil spill incidents
with accumulative individual M-Target
volume is < 5 bbls
To establish and sustain CCI awareness to all level within your
organization.

To have up-to-date knowledge of CCI related matters.

To provide regular updates to organization on CCI related


matters.

To consolidate and provide feedback on CCI result before OCM.

To engage MPM on the detail of CCI result after OCM. (if


necessary)

To channel concern on any matter related to CCI to MPM.

To provide feedback, facilitating effective knowledge sharing on


CCI, and providing event management assistance in any
engagement.
NAME EMAIL PHONE NO.

Hajejah Bt Ali hajejah@petronas.com.my 03 - 2331 8430

Norsilawati Bt Kamaruzzaman norsilw@petronas.com.my 03 - 2331 0658

Noor Azira Bt M Anual noorazira_anual@petronas.com.my 03 - 2331 8859

Muhammad Faridz Samat mfaridz_samat@petronas.com.my 03 - 2392 0350


• Non-Cost Recoverable Expenditure
• HSE Incidents and performance YTD
• Procedural Findings
HSE • HSE Legal Violation
• Recurring Issue
• Produce Water and Effluent discharge
Finance • Compliance to Provision Production Sharing Accounts
• Incident Notification and Performance Reporting
Adjustment (PPAA)
• PSC Fiscal & Financial Terms
• Well • Submission Date
Exploration • Seismic Acquisition & Processing • Format Compliance
• Other G&G acquisition/studies
Technical • Data Submission
• FDP
Data
• Post Drilling Report (PDR)
Development • FFR (applicable to RE only) Training
• Appraisal wells • Training Commitment
Commitment
• PSC Commitment within Development Period
• Project Implementation
• Exploration Drilling
Production • Production Drilling • Development Drilling
• Measurement • Workover
Operations
• Facilities Integrity & Reliability

• Sourcing Governance • ABR submitted with partner’s approval


SCM • ABR submitted after Technical Discussion held with
• Procurement Planning Governance WPB
Governance • Materials Governance respective MPM line departments
• ABR submitted before commencement of the activity.

• Reservoir Management
Sub Surface • Well Management • PSC Annual Organisation Chart
• Technical Potential M’sianisation • Malaysianisation Targets
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

TRCF i. Meet PAC target


i.Exceed PAC target
i. For PAC with < 1M MH
N/A N/A
ii. Meet MPM
ii.Exceed MPM target
ii. For PAC with > 1M MH target
HSE Incidents and performance
YTD Any incident with
Volume < 5 bbls Volume > 5bbls in any
Oil Spill Volume No Spill National impact
in any incident incident
( Tier 3)
Damage < USD 25k in Damage > USD 25k in
Fire Incidents No Fire incident N/A
any incident any incident
Summons/compounds/Government
0 N/A N/A Any Non compliance
Notices/Public Complaints /
Monthly average Exceed EDQ allowable PW
HSE Legal Violation limit
-DOE EDQ Gas Terminal 10 mg/L < limit N/A N/A > limit
-DOE EDQ Crude Terminal 40 mg/L
-DOE EDQ offshore Regulatory 100 ppm
As per outline in Does not comply to
Compliance to PPGUA Volume 3 ( Incident
Appendices 3 and 4 N/A N/A Appendices 3 and 4 of
Notification)
Incident Notification and of PPGUA Volume 3 PPGUA Volume 3
Performance Reporting Never exceed
Compliance to PPGUA Volume 3 (Key Exceed 10th of the
10th of the following N/A N/A
performance indicator and reporting) following month
month
Exceed more than 3
Offshore Produced Water (Monthly Never exceed Exceed once (per Exceed twice (within
PETRONAS PW 40 ppm; times
average) PETRONAS 40ppm facility) * the same facility)
(per facility)

**For PAC with fatality, the rating will be downgraded to next lower rating e.g. if the PAC scoring is 1.5 (Good rating), the final score will be downgraded to 2.0 (which is the lower limit of the Fair rating)
Fatality is an ultimate loss to the Company. However, MPM still acknowledge the compliance to HSE requirements and the efforts in incident prevention,
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Additional non >1 Quarter Delay


As approved in
commitment well or 1 quarter delay from from approved
Scheduling WPB
<approved in WPB approved WPB WPB
(commitment)
(commitment)

Cost <NOOP NOOP+10% N/A- >NOOP+10%


NOOP + >10%
NOOP + >10% with
Dry Case ≤ NOOP NOOP + ≤10% with no valid
valid reason
reason
Drilling Days ≤ NOOP
< = > NOOP fail
Or
Success Case to penetrate 1 N/A N/A
> NOOP with valid
Well objective
reason
Meet well Meet well objective
NOOP or additional
objective with with Significant Does not meet well
Well final total depth depth penetration
Slight deviation deviation from objective
to test further
from NOOP NOOP
Pre-drill reporting >30 days prior <30 days prior
N/A N/A
(Well proposal) drilling drilling

Post-drill reporting <3 months after >3 months after


N/A N/A
(G&G well report) well P&A well P&A

< Approved WPB < Approved WPB 0 activity


No. of Exploration Well ≥ Approved WPB
with valid reason with no valid reason conducted
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Additional non
>1 quarter delay from
commitment As approved in 1 quarter delay from
Scheduling approved WPB
or < as approved in WPB (commitment) approved WPB
WPB (commitment)

< Seismic proposal < Seismic proposal


Line Km / Sq. Km ≥ Seismic proposal 0 activity conducted
with valid reason with no valid reason
> (ACV + >10% with > (ACV + >10% with
Cost ≤ACV > (ACV + ≥10%)
valid reason) no valid reason)

Seismic proposal Seismic proposal


Seismic proposal
Seismic Acquisition and Days ≤ Seismic proposal + >10% with valid + >10% with no valid
+ ≥10%
Processing reason reason

> 30 days prior <30 days prior


Pre-acquisition reporting (geophysical acq.(marine) / acq.(marine) /
N/A N/A
proposal) >60 days prior acq. <60 days prior acq.
land) (land)
>14 days prior <14 days prior
acq.(marine) / acq.(marine) /
Pre-survey clearance Notification N/A N/A
>60 days prior acq. <60 days prior acq.
(land) (land)
No. of Seismic Acquisition / Processing < Approved WPB < Approved WPB
≥ Approved WPB 0 activity conducted
Program with valid reason with no valid reason
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Additional non
commitment As approved in
1 quarter delay from >1 quarter delay
Scheduling Or earlier than the WPB
approved WPB from approved WPB
Other G&G Data Acquisition schedule in the (commitment)
approved WPB.

ACV + >10% with ACV + >10% with


Cost ≥ ACV ACV + ≥10%
valid reason no valid reason
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

MR#4 Timelines
Ahead of plan As per plan N/A Later than planned
- Based on MR1
i. Later than plan
i. As per plan
FDP Submission i. Ahead of plan ii. Poor
FDP ii. Complete with
i. Timeliness (Based on MR4) ii. Complete with completeness
comprehensive N/A
ii. Completeness inclusive of Cost & comprehensive with minimal
supporting
Schedule report supporting details supporting
details
details

PDR Submission (a) = 6 months after (a) > 6 months after


(a) <6 months after
(a) Submission of PDR no later than six completion of the completion of the
completion of the last N/A
months after the last well of the drilling last well last well
well
phase.
Post Drilling Report (PDR)
OR (b) = the timing as (b) > the timing as
(b) < the timing as
(b) For long drilling programmers, which last committed in committed in MR#4
committed in MR#4 as N/A
more than 1 year, PDR will be submitted MR#4 as per as per drilling
per drilling phases
in phases, as agreed on the MR#4 sitting drilling phases phases

Number of FFR Studies Initiated over


Full Field Review (FFR) More than requirement Meets requirement > 50% initiated < 50% initiated
requirements, as per PPGUA

Appraisal Wells (per WPB) As per committed N/A N/A Less than committed
Appraisal Well
< 1 month prior
Submission of appraisal wells proposals > 1 month prior drilling N/A N/A
drilling
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Earlier than Approved As per Approved 1st Later than Approved


Project Schedule Performance N/A
1st Gas/ Oil date. Gas/ Oil date. 1st Gas/ Oil date.

More than 10% of


Less than Approved As per Approved
Project Cost Performance N/A Approved Project
Project Cost Project Cost + 10%
Cost

Submission of Final Investment Review


(FIR) Proposal

(a) For development projects, submission


within one (1) month of the major
Project Implementation contracts being put in place (circa 70% More than 1 month
of contracts awarded) or within one (1) Less than 1 month 1 month and less than 3 More than 3 months
month of fabrication award whichever months
comes first.
OR
(b) For infill projects, submission within
one (1) month from the completion of
drilling activities.

Submission of Close Out Report - within 3 More than 3 months


months of the project's initial acceptance Less than 3 months 3 months and less than 6 More than 6 months
as per PPGUA months
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Producing above the


Production target for crude Meeting the PSC/ RSC Not meeting the PSC/
PSC/ RSC oil N/A
production oil production target RSC oil production target
production target

Production target for gas 98% of gas sales Meeting 95% of gas Not meeting the gas
N/A
Production production nomination target sales nomination target sales nomination target

Below flaring/venting Meeting the Exceed the flaring/venting


Flaring/Venting N/A
limit flaring/venting limit limit

>94% (Oil) 91% to 94% (Oil) <91% (Oil)


Facilities Uptime Management N/A
>94% (Gas) 91% to 94% (Gas) <91% (Gas)

Facilities Integrity & Reliability Facilities Inspection &


100% compliance <95% compliance <90% compliance <80% compliance
Maintenance

• 90% actual/
Improvement/ Rejuvenation • <90% actual/
• 97% actual/ plan • 95% actual/ plan plan
Initiatives 85%plan
• Lower than • Within approved • >10% of
• Schedule • >20% of approved
approved budget budget approved
• Cost budget
budget
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

• Below 90%
• 90% completion completion of
• 100% completion • 95% completion of
of validation/ validation/
as per validation/ validation/
calibration master calibration master
Measurement compliance of calibration master calibration master
plan plan
Custody points plan plan
• 50% metering
• 100% metering • 75% metering • Below 50%
system
system availability system availability metering system
availability
availability
• Below 85%
• 85% completion completion of
• 95% completion as • 90% completion of
of validation/ validation/
per validation/ validation/
calibration master calibration master
Measurement compliance of calibration master calibration master
plan plan
allocation points plan plan
• 50% metering
Measurement • 100% metering • 75% metering • Below 50%
system
system availability system availability metering system
availability
availability
Sampling Performance 100% samples >90% samples <90% samples
N/A
(GAPA / MTAB user) availability availability availability

• Closing before 17th of • Closing on 17th of • Closing after 17th of


following month for following month for following month for • N/A
GAPA GAPA GAPA
MTAB/GAPA Closing Report • Closing after 30th of
• Closing by 25th of • Closing between 26- • Closing between following month for
following month for 28th of following 29-30th of following MTAB
MTAB month for MTAB month for MTAB
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Variance between Company Estimate & ETBAP >+20%


< 10% 10% - 20% 21% - 30% > 30%
(% of total TCEAR presented)

Sourcing No. of Retroactive Presentation beyond 2 months provision* (% of total paper


NIL 1% - 5% 6% - 10% > 10%
Governance presented)

Contract Extension Presented < 3 months before Contract Expiry


< 10% 10% - 20% 21% - 30% > 30%
(% of total CE&CAE presented)

Average Surplus Disposal Efficiency (Tender & IR (NI))


<100 days 100 – 110 Days 111 – 120 Days >120 Days
(No of days from ADF Sign Off date to payment remittance to PETRONAS)

Inventory Optimization
> 5% 3% - 5% 1% - 2% < 1%
Materials (Material in storage quantity reduction)
Governance
Submission of Materials Review and Disposal Plan
4 3 2 1
(No. of report submitted)

Submission of Monthly Report 1st Working Day 3rd Working Day 5th Working Day 7th Working Day
(Materials in storage) of the month of the month of the month of the month

Procurement
Planning Master Procurement Plan (MPP) Execution > 80% 66% - 80% 50% - 65% < 50%
Governance
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

RMP >80% Compliance 65% Compliance 50% Compliance <50% Compliance

Reservoir Management IRFMP timeliness On time 5 days late 10 days late >10 days late

RMP Document On time 5 days late 10 days late >10 days late

100% as per 60% as per


80% as per beginning <60% as per beginning
Active Well beginning of assessed beginning of
of assessed period of assessed period
period assessed period

Well Management Idle Well Restoration 100% as plan 80% as plan 60% as plan <60% as plan

P&A 100% as plan 90% as plan 80% as plan <80% as plan

Technical Potential Performance 100% as submitted 90% as submitted 80% as submitted <80% as submitted
Technical Potential
Production Enhancement 100% as submitted 90% as submitted 80% as submitted <80% as submitted
Sub-
Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor
Component

WPB : (a) No. of overrun projects/line items without PETRONAS approval 0 N/A N/A =>1

WPB : (b) No. of disapproved ABR/YECO that is being claimed without


0 1 2 =>3
any adjustment made by operator
Payroll : (a) Non-compliance on expatriate benefits to PETRONAS
0 1 2 =>3
approval limit (by number of personnel)

Payroll : (b) No. of disapproved Expatriates 0 1 2 =>3

G&A : (a) No. of firm NCR related to non-compliance to Article 1 0 1-2 3-4 =>5
G&A : (b) No. of entertainment and G&A events exceeding PETRONAS
0 1 2 =>3
approval limit
Non-Cost
Procurement : (a) No. of ACV exceeding 10% allowable leverage and
Recoverable 0 N/A N/A =>1
without PETRONAS/internal approval
Expenditure
Procurement : (a) Non-compliance contracts to PETRONAS/ internal
0 1 2 =>3
procurement guidelines
Drilling : No. of unacceptable NPT hours contributed to NCR 0 N/A N/A =>1
Insurance Claims/Expenditure/Legal Fees : No. of outstanding
0 N/A N/A =>1
insurance claims/legal course charged to PETRONAS
Affiliates : No. of affiliate charges without PETRONAS approval 0 1 2 =>3
Project Audit : Total project cost exceeding PETRONAS approval limit
0 N/A N/A =>1
(FDP/FIA)
Material Transfer/Disposal : No. of material transfer/disposal between
0 N/A N/A =>1
inter or intra PSC without PETRONAS approval
All other areas which are not covered by the above sub-indicators i.e.
0 1 2 =>3
fixed assets, PSC payments, overhead charges, and etc.
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

No. of Procedural Findings issued 0 1 2 =>3

No monetary impact N/A Has monetary impact on


Impact of Procedural Findings N/A
Procedural Findings on PETRONAS PETRONAS

Resolution/Closure of PF during
All PF raised during One or more PF raised
audit revisit: All PF raised should N/A N/A
the previous audit are during the previous
be closed within 6 months or before
closed audit is still OPEN
the next audit commence.

Recurring Issue No. of recurring issue 0 1 2 =>3

Compliance to Provision Compliance of contractor to the Complied to PPAA Disagree to comply to


Production Sharing Accounts PPAA issued in the next barrel requirements and N/A N/A PPAA requirements and
Adjustment (PPAA) lifting (100%) adjusted lifting do not adjust lifting.

Complied in
Full compliance on
Compliance of Contractor on suspending all
suspending Suspended certain
Suspense Account suspending disapproved categories but No suspension done
disapproved categories only.
items/capping. overlooked some
items/capping
details.
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Entitlement Comply N/A N/A Not Comply

PSC Fiscal & Financial Terms PSC Payments Comply N/A N/A Not Comply

Stock Movement Comply N/A N/A Not Comply

Schedule 2: Statement of Schedule 2 : Statement of


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
Expenditure Expenditure

Submission of Quarterly
<60 days after quarter 60 days after quarter >60 days after quarter
Audited Accounts 60 days N/A
end end end
after quarter end
Submission Date of Quarterly
Audited Accounts
<14 days after 14 days after
Submission of Gas >14 days after
submission of submission of
Entitlement Adjustment N/A submission of Quarterly
Quarterly Audited Quarterly Audited
(GEA) Audited Accounts
Accounts Accounts

As per standardization of
PSC Audited Accounts
Format Compliance of Quarterly
circulated to contractors - 0 1 2 =>3
Audited Account
No. of Procedural Findings
issued
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Technical Data 100% on time


Submission for submission as per
Technical Data Submission 100% submission 80% submission <80% submission
completed activities, stipulated timelines in
last 18 months period PPGUA
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Training Commitment Utilization as per


Approved Training Plan by PSC
100% utilized >=80% utilized >=50% utilized <50% utilized
Contractor (subject to available
resources by PETRONAS)
PSC Training Commitment
Annual 4/4 ( 100%) 3/4 ( 75%) 2/4 (50%) 1/4 (25%)
Submission of TC
utilization report
(Quarterly)
Bi-Annual 2/2 ( 100%) N/A ½ ( 50%) 0
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

NOOP submission 14 days prior drilling Comply N/A N/A Not Comply

Approved NOOP deviation approval Comply N/A N/A Not Comply

Final Well Report (FWR) submission within 60


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
days of well completion

BOP test every 14 days or any extension with


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
PETTRONAS approval

Development /
Exploration Drilling Plug and abandonment prior execution Comply N/A N/A Not Comply

Rig arrival/release notification to PETTRONAS


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
within 24hrs of rig arrival/release

A continuous NPT more than 50hrs,


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
immediate formal notification to PETRONAS

Monthly NPT report data submission Comply N/A N/A Not Comply

Final Well Report cost is max within + 10% of


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
Well’s AFE
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

NOWOP submission 14 days prior well


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
execution

BOP test every 14 days or any extension with


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
PETTRONAS approval
Workover/Major Well Final Workover/Major Well Intervention Report
Intervention (FWOR) submission within 60 days of Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
completion

Submission of major well intervention quarterly


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
plan

Final Workover/Major Well Intervention Report


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
cost is max within + 10% pf Well’s AFE

Number of wells delivered as per approved


Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
WPB (Drilling & Workover)

PAC’s Idle Well Growth Management (total


Overall Project number of strings emerging must be less than Comply N/A N/A Not Comply
40% of total strings restored)

Rig Ultilization: minimum 100% Comply N/A N/A Not Comply


Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Percentage of ABR
ABR submitted with partner’s approval 100% - 75% 74% - 50% 49% - 25% 24% - 0%
submission

ABR submitted after Technical Discussion Percentage of ABR


100% - 75% 74% - 50% 49% - 25% 24% - 0%
held with respective MPM Line Departments submission

ABR submitted before commencement of the Percentage of ABR


100% - 75% 74% - 50% 49% - 25% 24% - 0%
activity submission
Sub-Component Indicator Good Fair Unsatisfactory Poor

Compliance to Not meet all KPI


Meet all KPI target Meet 2 KPI target Meet 1 KPI target
approved M-targets target
PSC Annual Organisation Chart and
Malaysianisation Targets
Performance of No decrease in % for Decrease in % for 1 Decrease in % for 2 Decrease in % for all
Individual M-targets all 3 KPIs KPI KPI KPI
Abbreviation Meaning Abbreviation Meaning
1M MH 1 Million Manhour MR1 Milestone Review #1
ABR Additional Budget Request N/A Not Applicable
ACV Approved Contract Value NOOP Notice of Operation
ADF Asset Disposal Form NOWOP Notice of Workover Operations
AFE Approved For Expenditure NPT Non-Productive Time
bbls barrels OCM Operations Committee Meeting
BOP Blowout Preventer OSR Offshore Self-Regulation
CAE Contract Amendment and Extension P&A Plug & Abandon
CCI Contractor Compliance Index PAC Petroleum Arrangement Contractor
CE Company Estimate / Contract Extension PDA Petroleum Development Act
DOE Department of Environment PDR Post Drilling Report
EDQ Effluent Discharge Quality PF Procedural Finding
ETBAP Estimated Total Bid Award Price PMGUA PETRONAS Malaysianisation Guideline for Upstream Activities
FDP Field Development Plan PPAA Provisional PSC Accounts Adjustments
FFR Full Field Review PPGUA PETRONAS Procedures and Guidelines for Upstream Activities
FIR Final Investment Review PSC Production Sharing Contract
FWOR Final Workover/Major Well Intervention Report PTS PETRONAS Technical Standard
FWR Final Well Report RMP Reservoir Management Plan
G&A General & Administrative RSC Risk Service Contract Guidelines
G&G G&G abbreviation means Geological and Geophysical. SCM Supply Chain Management Governance
GAPA / MTAB Global Arrangement Production Allocation / Measurement Governance
Testing Allocation Balancing TC Training Commitment
GEA Gas Entitlement Adjustment TCAMUA Tender & Contracts Administrative Manual for Upstream
HSE Health Safety Environment Operations
HSEMS Health Safety & Environment Management System TCEAR Techno Commercial Evaluation and Award Recommendation
IRFMP Integrated Review of Field Management & Performance TRCF Total Recordable Case Frequency
KPI Key Performance Index WP&B Work Program & Budget
MPM Malaysia Petroleum Management YTD Year To Date
MR#4 Milestone Review #4
Compliance MPM line dept. MPM
PACs OCM
Management
1
Issue notification on
CCI submission to all
MPM line dept. 2
Prepare & submit CCI
results to Compliance.
3
Analyze CCI Results. 7
CCI Results
presentation.
4
Conduct CCI challenge
session with MPM LDs.

5
• Sharing CCI results 2
weeks prior OCMs.

• Challenge session
with PACs. 6
Obtain CCI result
endorsement by MPM
Management via Memo.
 Bi-annually assessment & monitoring
 Once a year presentation in OCM

Present 2015 Result


in Q4 / 2nd Half OCM
(Feb/Mar’16)
2nd Half Assessment

Jan’15 Jun’15 Dec’15 Jun’16

1st Half Assessment

You might also like