You are on page 1of 177

UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY

(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)


City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

Chapter 1

THE PROBLEM

Introduction

Science education has played and contributed to the improvement of the

life of people over the years. In fact, what would the world be, without Science?

How would people live without Science? Science education prepares students to

communicate effectively as educators and researchers in order to lead future

generations in science and technology education.

To address the need to develop science and technology performance of

students, the Philippine government encourages schools, public and private to

adopt science curriculum in response to Republic Act 76781 which utters that the

state shall give priority to research and development, invention, innovation and

their utilization, and to science and technology education, training and services. It

shall support indigenous, appropriate, and self-reliant scientific technological

capabilities and their application to the country’s productive systems.

The Department of Education (DepED), as the lead agency in Science

education, in its ongoing efforts to lift the quality of education in the country,

implemented the K to 12 curriculum under the Republic Act No. 10533 series of

20122, also known as the “Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013” which aims to

upgrade the country’s education system. Aside from having competent and

skillful teachers in line with the K to 12 program, we also need to develop


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

effectual instructional materials that are aligned to the requirements of the 21st

century learning, thus, will enable the learners to cope up with these educational

changes for a life-long learning and reverse the current backward science and

technology situation of the country.

The Department of Education also gives so much emphasis in innovation

primarily in science education by giving trainings, seminars, scholarships, and

programs that will make learning more meaningful for students and for teachers

to further enhance their skills and competencies. An example of this is the

National Training on Strategic Intervention Materials Development in summer of

2005. The training workshop aimed to enhance teachers’ skill in test analysis and

interpretation and capacitate them in developing various intervention materials

for remediation and enrichment of learning.3

Moreover, an In-Service Training on the Development of Strategic

Intervention Materials (SIM) in Science was held in August 2017 in Davao City.

The objective of the training is to capacitate teachers with the skills and know-

how in designing and constructing science strategic intervention materials that

effectively address least mastered competencies and difficulties of learners. 4

Locally, the Iriga City Division conducts SIM-making contests for teachers

every September. Winners will represent the division in Bicol Regional

Patiribayan Festival cognizant to DepED’s pursuit of achieving quality education


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

in the region with the use of various school resources designed to impart

information to students.

Despite all of these efforts of the government, science education in the

Philippines are far behind compared to other countries in terms of instruction and

research. The lack of science education competency is reflected on the poor

quality of basic science instruction as shown on the low achievement scores of

Filipino students in various tests. The researcher hopes to improve this result

with the help of this Strategic Intervention Materials.

Teaching preparation of school teachers in science is also a factor in

learning. There is only a small fraction of teachers in high school that is qualified

and capable to teach Physics, Earth Science, Chemistry, and Biology. Although

these numbers have increased due to scholarship efforts of the Department of

Science and Technology (DOST), there is still a need to have programs for the

continuing professional development such as training programs and conferences.

Without our industries, science and engineering graduates will not even be able

to find suitable engineering and science work in the country. It is in these reasons

that encouraged the researcher to develop the strategic intervention materials

(SIM) as the output of this study.

This study therefore intends to develop strategic intervention materials in

Science 8 in the context of the K to 12 curriculum that will help the students

overcome their least mastered competencies and master the subject matter. As a
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

Science 8 teacher, the researcher is much apprehensive on how to improve the

students’ performance in the four learning areas of science namely: Physics,

Earth Science, Chemistry, and Biology. This will help them enjoy science through

easy as well as challenging activities prepared for them which they will find useful

within and outside the school. Same with, the fun of this fundamental tool will

leave a mark on their minds which will be of great help in understanding that

science is an integral part of daily life.

Theoretical Framework

This study is anchored on two theories which have bearing on the problem

being studied. These theories are: Constructivist Theory of Learning of John

Dewey and Lev Vygotsky and System’s Approach of Instructional Design

Theory of Walter Dick and Lou Carey. Figure 1 shows the theoretical paradigm

of the study, the Science Key Intervention Theory (Science KIT).

Constructivist Theory of Learning of John Dewey5 rejects the notion

that schools should focus on repetitive, rote memorization. Instead he proposed

a method of "directed living" in which students would engage in real-world,

practical workshops in which they would demonstrate their knowledge through

creativity and collaboration. Students should be provided with opportunities to

think from themselves and articulate their thoughts. Furthermore, Lev

Vygotsky6 pioneered research in learning sciences and made a strong argument

for the need for students to demonstrate their knowledge by creating


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

explanations and interpreting their work for others. To Vygotsky, teachers served

as mediators who coached and encouraged students to formulate their own level

of understanding. Each student has a base level of knowledge, but they can

increase it by practicing what they know well and adding onto it.

The System’s Approach of Instructional Design Theory by Walter

Dick and Lou Carey is systematic in nature. The model addresses instruction as

an entire system, focusing on the interrelationship between context, content,

learning, and instruction. According to Dick and Carey, “Components such as the

instructor, learners, materials, instructional activities, delivery system, and

learning and performance environments interact with each other and work

together to bring about the desired student learning outcomes”. 7

With the insights gained from the aforementioned theories, the researcher

theorizes that achievements of the students can be improved with the use of

various learning activities through the use of different instructional materials such

as strategic intervention materials.

Since the strategic intervention materials used by the students involved

several parts wherein the students worked on, it is in this context that learner-

teacher interaction was observed. It follows from this; constructivists maintain

that learners need to be empowered and to have control over the learning

process, so the teacher serves as facilitator of learning.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY OF SYSTEM’S APPROACH OF


LEARNING of John Dewey and INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN THEORY
Lev Vygotsky of Walter Dick and Lou Carey

SCIENCE KEY INTERVENTION THEORY


(Science KIT)
Lacbay’s Theory

Figure 1
THEORETICAL PARADIGM
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

And the researcher’s theory named as Science Key Intervention Theory

(Science KIT) premises that the learning environment should be deluged with

new products, instructional media, curricular materials and kits, tools, and

modern equipment that can be utilized maximally to facilitate the presentation of

science concepts with ease and accuracy, and then the desired output on high

performance level can be attained. Instructional tools such as the use of strategic

intervention materials serve as key intervention in teaching science in a more

meaningful way.

The interlinking relationships of the two famous learning theories such as

Constructivist Theory of Learning and System’s Approach of Instructional Design

Theory as well as the researcher’s theory named as Science Key Intervention

Theory (Science KIT), rests on students’ achievement. It is in the use of the

Strategic Intervention Materials where these theories would surface from among

the students. It unifies the concept of teachers as facilitators of learning and the

construction of instructional materials which includes student-centered activities.

It emphasizes the importance that students should be given a chance to learn in

an environment where there is no teacher dominance. To be able to meet the

challenges of modern science instruction, much of the development in science

education has to do with how science is taught. It is worthwhile to try new modes

of teaching where the main benefactor are the learners.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

Conceptual Framework

The researcher used system approach in its conceptualization

emphasizing the input, process, and output.

Input. The inputs of this study are the least mastered learning

competencies (LMLC) in Science 8 based from the results of the teacher-made

test. The LMLCs were the following: Light and Sound, Beyond the Earth, Periodic

Table of Elements, and Heredity.

Process. This includes the analysis of the least mastered learning

competencies based from the results of the teacher-made test. It also includes

the preparation and curricular validation of the strategic intervention materials.

Output. Based from the data, strategic intervention materials in Science 8

in the context of the K to 12 curriculum is prepared for students to overcome their

least mastered competencies and master the subject matter.

The recommendation is sent back to the concerned personnel as

indicated by the feedback loop shown. The feedback loop provides a

mechanism for further development of the study. If the result indicates needed

changes, then the input needs modification to increase effectiveness or

efficiency. On the contrary, if the effect of the use of the strategic intervention

materials is positive, then continuous improvement may still be made to adapt to

curricular changes when deemed necessary. The conceptual paradigm is

presented in Figure 2 which serves as the research guide for the study.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

The least 1. Analysis of the


mastered least mastered STRATEGIC
learning learning INTERVENTION
competencies in competencies. MATERIALS
Science 8 based
2. Preparation of (SIM) IN
from the results
of the teacher- the Strategic SCIENCE 8 IN
made test were Intervention THE CONTEXT
as follows: Materials. OF THE K TO 12
Light and Sound, 3. Curricular CURRICULUM
Beyond the validation of the
Earth, Periodic Strategic
Table of
Intervention
Elements, and
Materials.
Heredity.

FEEDBACK

Figure 2
CONCEPTUAL PARADIGM
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

10

Statement of the Problem

This study aims to develop Strategic Intervention Materials in Science 8 in

the context of the K to 12 curriculum. Specifically, it sought answers to the

following questions:

1. What are the least mastered learning competencies in Science 8 based

from the results of the teacher-made test?

2. What strategic intervention materials can be developed based from the

least mastered learning competencies in Science 8?

3. Is the developed strategic intervention materials for Science 8

curricularly valid?

Assumptions of the Study

This study was premised on the following assumptions:

1. There are least mastered learning competencies in Science 8.

2. Strategic Intervention Materials can be developed based from the least

mastered learning competencies in Science 8.

3. The developed strategic intervention materials in Science 8 are

curricularly valid, based from the guidelines in evaluating strategic intervention

materials prepared and issued by the Department of Education.

Significance of the Study

The findings of this study will be beneficial to the following:


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

11

Teachers. This material will surely help teachers in teaching science

concepts in Grade 8 students because of its interesting activities, designs, and

structures aligned in the K to 12 curriculum. It can be use in assessing students

thru answering the activity cards in this material. Also, they may modify learning

materials presented herein based on the needs of their students. It will help them

facilitate teaching in a more interesting way and will help them enhance

competence and effectiveness as a science teacher.

Students. This material will enhance and deepen the knowledge and

skills of the students for scientific pursuits. Increased learning is achieved

through the use of these materials by keeping them exposed to various learning

activities aligned in the K to 12 curriculum that will surely hone their critical

thinking skills. They are the main benefactor of this study, thus, will help them

overcome their least mastered competencies and master the subject matter.

School Heads and Administrators. As the head of the school, these

instructional materials would be of great help to them in the formulation of

policies that will encourage other teachers to use strategic intervention materials

in their teaching pedagogy.

School. This strategic intervention materials may serve as a source of

information for both teachers and students that will contribute to the whole

development of the school.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

12

Department of Education (DepED). Results may prove worthwhile for

the Department of Education to come up with policies and guidelines that should

be adopted and implemented to all schools in order to uplift science education in

our country.

Future Researchers. Other researchers may use these materials as their

guide in developing their own research studies in the future.

Strategic Intervention Materials Writers. Other strategic intervention

materials writers can refer to the materials presented herein for the benefit of

their endeavor.

Scope and Delimitation

This study aimed to develop strategic intervention materials in Science 8

in the context of the K to 12 curriculum. It includes the least mastered learning

competencies in Science 8 based from the results of the teacher-made test

conducted to the Grade 8 students of University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City

School Year 2016-2017. The constructed strategic intervention materials in

Science 8 is validated using the guidelines in evaluating SIM, based from the

standardized criteria prepared and issued by the Department of Education.

Definition of Terms

For clarity in the interpretation and understanding of this study, the

following terms are defined.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

13

Activity Card. The activity card provides the activities or tasks that the

learner should undertake in order to develop a skill. The activities are drawn from

the subtasks taken from the identified least mastered learning competencies.

Answer Card. The answer card contains the answer to the questions or

problems found in the activity card, assessment card, and enrichment card. This

is a part added by the researcher to employ self-evaluation and encourage

responsibility for self-learning of the students.

Assessment Card. The assessment card helps the learner measure

his/her level of mastery of the skill upon completion of the tasks.

Curricular Validity. It refers to the evidence of test validity shown by

agreement between content and curricular objectives. 8

Department of Education (DepED). The executive department of the

Philippine government responsible for ensuring access to promoting equity and

improving the quality of basic education.9

Enrichment Card. The enrichment card extends learning by providing

additional exercises for further application of knowledge or skill.

Guide Card. The guide card presents the big picture. It gives an overview

of the lesson, presents the focus skills, engages the learner’s interest, and leads

the learner towards the performance of the tasks.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

14

K to 12 Curriculum. The K to 12 program covers Kindergarten and 12

years of basic education to provide sufficient time for mastery of concepts and

skills, develop lifelong learners, and prepare graduates for tertiary education.10

Least Mastered Learning Competencies (LMLC). As used in the study,

are the topics or competencies in Science 8 that the students are finding difficulty

based from the results of the teacher-made test, thus, requiring the use of

intervention materials in order to attain mastery learning among students.

Reference Card. The reference card provides additional content to the

coverage of textbook, definition of terms, important concepts, or needed

illustrations. It may also list resources that the learner may refer for further

reading. The resources may be books, magazines, other reading materials, and

internet resources.

Spiral Curriculum Approach. A course of study in which students will

see the same topics throughout their school career, with each encounter

increasing in complexity and reinforcing previous learning. 11

Strategic Intervention Materials. Strategic intervention materials,

popularly known as SIM in Philippine education is an instructional material meant

to teach concept or topics which are considered least mastered by the

students.12
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

15

Teacher-Made Test. As used in the study, is defined as the test made by

the teacher which can assess and gain perspective on the least mastered topics

of the students.

Title Card. This card shows at a glance, what a particular intervention

material is all about. It contains terms which directly connect the learner to the

concepts to be learned and skills to be acquired.

Validation. It is the process of determining the effectiveness of the

strategic intervention materials through the results of the evaluation.

Review of Related Literature and Studies

This is the presentation of review of related literature and studies which

the researcher found to be relevant to the present study. The related literature

and studies helped the researcher conceptualize and operationalize the variables

from which the study was anchored from.

Strategic Intervention Materials

Improving the science education has been one of the major concerns of

the 21st century; hence, it must be given proper attention. According to Manila

Times13, apart from few universities in the Philippines that shifted their calendar

year to August, nothing much has changed as student-teacher and student-

classroom ratios have not improved.

Classrooms are scarce, but the situation for science laboratories is even

worse. The Department of Education reports a serious lack of science


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

16

laboratories in both elementary and high schools all over the country. According

to DepED data, in regions III, IV-A, X, XI, and XII, only one school has a science

laboratory out of every 10 public elementary schools. In the National Capital

region, this ratio is 3 laboratories for every 10 elementary schools. The public

elementary schools in the other regions don’t have any science laboratory to

facilitate science learning.

Preliminary results from a survey done by Raymond Pingol from the

Versatile Instrumentation System for Science Education and Research (VISSER)

project show that only around 20% of high schools have laboratories with non-

traditional “modern” equipment. Unfortunately, these “modern” equipment are

typically no more than the combination of a computer and an LCD projector.

The lack of science education facilities is reflected on the poor quality of

basic science and math education seen by the low achievement scores of

Filipino students in various tests. The passing rate for the national achievement

test (NAT) for grade 6 is only 69.21%. This was already a 24% improvement

compared to the 2005-2006 passing rate but is still below the passing rate of

75%. On the other hand, the NAT passing rate for high school is 46.38% in SY

2009-2010, which is a slight decrease from 47.40% in SY 2008-2009.The last

time we participated in international surveys like the 2003 Trends in International

Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), the Philippines ranked 34th out of 38

countries in HS II Math and 43rd out of 46 countries in HS II Science; for grade 4,


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

17

the Philippines ranked 23rd out of 25 participating countries in both math and

science. In 2008, even with only the science high schools participating in the

Advanced Mathematics category, the Philippines ranked lowest among 10

countries.

Teaching preparation of public school teachers in science is also a factor

in learning. There is only a small fraction of teachers in high school that qualified

and capable to teach Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Mathematics. Although

these numbers have increased for public schools due to scholarship efforts of the

Department of Science and Technology (DOST), there is still a need to have

programs for the continuing professional development such as training programs

and conferences. The implementation of the K to 12 basic education program

does not bode well for science education. Science education will start only at

Grade 3, which is not comforting for the improvement in basic science and math

education. We need to develop critical thinking skills of our Filipino students at an

early age. The time allotment for laboratories and non-lecture activities is also

limited.

According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural

Organization (UNESCO) Science Report of 2010 on the Philippines, there were

only 81 researchers in research and development per million people in 2009.

Without our industries, science and engineering graduates will not even be able
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

18

find suitable engineering and science work in the country. Thus, they are rarely

allowed to contribute to the industrialization of the country.

Problems at the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical, and Astronomical

Services Administration (PAGASA) reflect this sorry state. Last year, PAGASA

Administrator Dr. Nathaniel Servando resigned from his public post after 23 years

of service to teach in Qatar. This year, more PAGASA weathermen resigned to

work as airport weather forecasters and communications specialists in Qatar.

These experts deferred their plans to quit last year since the government

promised to make their compensation equal to that paid to people working in

high-risk conditions. Those who stay are exposed to high risk jobs as the recent

news of scientists from the Bureau of Soils and Water Management who died in

a plane crash while on their cloud seeding activity. A weather specialist was

reported to have died during the height of the storm surge in Tacloban City when

Super typhoon Yolanda hit the place. He stayed behind to continue his work in

tracking the storm.

The whole PDAF scam have showed that the Philippines have billions of

pesos that should be channeled for the improvement of our public school science

laboratories, training programs of our public school teachers, and benefits for our

science workers. The Magna Carta for Science and Technology workers has yet

to be fully implemented to provide more benefits for those who stay here to work.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

19

The government’s plan for improving science and math education remains

limited to scholarships and a few projects. This must be improved and expanded

to address not only the supply side of science experts but also to build industries

that will utilize them. We need radical solutions to reverse the current backward

science and technology situation of the country.

According to Rodrigo14, strategic intervention materials are conceptualized

and designed to aid the teachers in providing the pupils the needed support to

make progress in studies. These will increase and deepen the skills, knowledge,

and understanding of the child in various subject areas not only in science and

math but also including various learning areas in the curriculum.

Strategic intervention materials can give the opportunity to explore various

ideas and concepts that would enrich their understanding of varied subject

matters that sharpen their competencies. Furthermore, the strategic instructional

materials tend to re-teach the lessons which are not so much clear to the

learners and to help them gain mastery of the skills.

Each intervention material contains five parts such as the guide card,

activity card, assessment card, enrichment card, and reference card.

The guide card stimulates the pupil’s interest on the topic discussed and

gave a preview of what they would learn. The activity card translates the focus

skills in at least three activities. The assessment card provides exercises, drills or

activities that allow pupils to assess their understanding of what they have
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

20

learned correct errors when appropriate and monitor their learning and use

feedback about their progress. The enrichment card provides activities that

reinforces the content of the lesson and provides opportunities for the pupils to

apply what they have learned to other subject areas or in new contexts. Finally,

the reference card provides further reading to the pupils.

Moreover, the strategic intervention materials guarantee alignment of

activities with the tasks/objectives, keep the activities short and simple, provide a

variety of activities to cater to the diverse learners; provide number of activities

so that the learner can have enough practice in developing the skill and focus on

the least mastered skills.

In addition, the designs of the strategic intervention materials are attractive

and eye-catching that is why a lot of teachers are encouraged to use them in the

teaching-learning process. The benefit of the strategic intervention materials is

not only for the teacher’s convenience and system in teacher but also for the

easy grasp of the learners.

There is a body in the Department of Education called the Instructional

Materials Council Secretariat (IMCS). According to The Philippine Star15, it

“provides technical assistance to the Instructional Materials Council in the

formulation and adoption of policies and guidelines, in the development,

evaluation, and procurement of textbooks and other instructional materials.” Its

mission is “to ensure that good quality and reasonably priced instructional
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

21

materials are made available or provided to all public elementary and secondary

schools when and where they are needed.” Its vision is that there are “quality

instructional materials for students in public elementary and secondary schools.”

Since it was formed, the IMCS has been the center of various

controversies about errors in textbooks and corruption in procurement. In 1990,

even the Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM) that was

responsible for setting up the trifocal system of education that we have now

(DepED, CHED, and TESDA) strongly criticized IMCS for its failure to provide

quality textbooks to public school students.

The problem lies not only in the persons that staff the IMCS. One can

reasonably argue that IMCS is understaffed, that it does not have a budget

proportionate to its importance in the country’s educational system that it

sometimes does have persons whose integrity is not beyond question. But that is

looking only at the trees and not at the wood. The real problem with IMCS is that

it is a secretariat that has no council. It is supposed to serve a council, but the

Instructional Materials Council (IMC), except for a rare meeting or two, does not

exist. The IMC was created as an afterthought. The name first appeared in 1983

in the General Appropriations Act, when the Textbook Council created by

Executive Order (EO) No. 806 in 1982 was listed as an Instructional Materials

Council. That seems, to my non-lawyer’s mind, a bit funny, since the IMC was

not created by a law nor an EO, but merely by a typist.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

22

In 1985, the DepED (then named Ministry of Education, Culture and

Sports or MECS) tried to justify the renaming of the Textbook Council through

MECS Order No. 64. On 30 September 1993, then President Fidel Ramos finally

issued EO 127, which “revitalized the Instructional Materials Council by

redefining its functions” and made it legal. This EO listed the members of the

IMC, namely, the Education Secretary, the Administrator of the Instructional

Materials Development Center (now the National Book Development Board), the

Director of Elementary Education, the Director of Secondary Education, and “two

(2) other members to be appointed by the President.” The IMC was given several

powers, the most curious of which is to “approve textbooks for use in private

elementary and secondary schools.”

That power given to IMC will surely raise not just the eyebrows but the

blood pressure of private school administrators. Private Higher Education

Institutions (HEIs) with academic freedom, which are now thinking of establishing

Senior High Schools, have yet another thing to worry about.

Of course, in our country, laws are made to be ignored. As far as I know,

this particular provision of EO 127 has never been implemented, but as even

non-lawyers know, “dura lex, sed lex” (the law may be tough, but it is the law).

Needless to say, as a private school administrator, I will be the first to object to

the implementation of this provision, but I will leave that battle for another day.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

23

The most important function of IMC is to “select and prescribe textbook

and supplementary and reference books for use in public elementary and

secondary schools.” This means that the IMCS has absolutely no authority to

decide on whether a textbook can be purchased by the DepED or not. That

authority resides only in the IMC. The IMCS is only a secretariat. Like any other

secretariat of any other body, public or private, it is supposed merely to

implement what the policy-makers decide. The IMCS is usurping the authority of

the IMC. In 2005, I was asked to be one of the two appointive members of the

IMC. We met once (or perhaps, I was invited only once because I was much too

vocal). During that meeting, we made decisions about some textbooks being

proposed for adoption in public schools. At least during that meeting, the IMC

actually did what it was supposed to do. That was a decade ago.

The Department of Education recently issued a textbook call for learning

resources for the K to 12 curriculum. Philippine publishers are now urging the

Department of Education to lift a moratorium on the procurement of

supplementary materials. We are, once again, getting lost in the trees. We

should not forget the fundamental questions. Who or what exactly is authorized

by law to approve textbooks and other learning materials for public schools? Who

now constitute the IMC? What is the IMCS a secretariat of?

Tan16 emphasizes that, “in the Philippines, the secondary science

education curriculum has been reformed towards providing greater opportunities


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

24

for students to realize that principles studied in class are relevant to everyday

life.”

Paulsen17, found out that majority of the students studied, held favorable

attitudes towards activity approach. The author also found out that the students’

achievement through approach correlates less highly with that of the other

subjects.

Salandanan18 presents a number of widely tested and adjusted effective

methodologies and techniques of teaching science. They are experimenting,

demonstrating, reading, field trips, discussion, using audio aids, preparing special

reports, resource persons, constructing projects, and collecting.

Arena19 examines the process of focusing on the higher order thinking

skills and the role those relevance players in their acquisition. The author argues

that an open inquiring style of instruction appears but suited to stimulating the

leaning of process skills because it allows pupils to purchase problems of

genuine relevance.

Basa20 discovers that the problems met by teachers in the teaching of

science are caused generally by the difficulty of the teachers in following the

curriculum guides. In all of the schools where the study has been conducted

there is difficulty in providing materials for instruction in science.

Adiong21 dealt on the perceptions of teachers on the frequency of their use

of teaching approaches and strategies.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

25

According to Villa22, teachers together with the parents should exert efforts

in analyzing further situations that will improve the learning skills of the pupils. In

this case, the role of the teachers is important as the link between the parents

and pupils behavior on improving their cognitive learning skills.

Previous studies about the educational achievement in Science of

developing countries has been rooted from the effects of the use of instructional

materials over teaching practices and other classroom strategies.

Lam23 enumerated different ways to be an effective teacher: (1) know the

materials for teaching, (2) organize and articulate material in manner

understandable to students, (3) manage the students to maintain their attention

in learning.

McKinney24 encouraged teachers to avoid over reliance on textbooks. This

according to him can reinforce through some device. He suggested the use of

circulating books that contain materials and supplies which are prepared-oriented

and age-oriented. Likewise, it should be hands-on science activities.

Ornstein25 conceives the idea that the type of instructional aides to be

used must be considered by the teacher in light of the purpose of the learning

activity. It should motivate the students, provide varied learning experiences,

allow for different interests, contribute to understanding, reinforce learning,

encourage participation, and provide experiences changing attitude and feelings.

Thus, it is necessary that teachers working together with their administrators


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

26

should design a curriculum that focuses on science process skills and through

directed inquiry.

According to Berger26 when making a presentation, it is important to use

transition or to show how one has organized his ideas. Transitions are the words,

phrases, or sentence that one used to connect ideas in a clear and logical way.

The use of transition helps listeners follow lesson progress as the teacher moves

from one idea to another or from one part of presentation to another.

Lardizabal27 stated that the instructional material are considered

inseparable partner of instructional methods. Such materials cannot be divorced

by methods. Like the man of the house, methods provide direction and unity in

the teaching process, and visual materials like the woman of the house with

attraction, spice, and gentle touch to the teaching-learning situation.

Rosenshine28 gives several suggestions for teacher presentation.

Materials should be presented in small steps so that one point can be mastered

by students before they proceed to another. Many varied examples of new skills

or concepts should be provided.

William29 explains that teacher should respond differently in learning

situation, applying methods in a unique way in relation to teaching style.

Dewey30 pointed out that learning is good when it provides learning

experiences or situations that will insure understanding. It requires a rich


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

27

environment of instructional materials and devices that will stimulate thinking and

challenge the attention of learners.

Kaslan and Store31 emphasize that teaching science; learning activities in

the teaching-learning process provide learners with the opportunities to develop

critical thinking.

Japson’s32 analysis on teacher-student interaction reveals that too much

teacher talk giving facts and explanation will not develop thinking skills and

scientific attitudes among students. As this prevails, silence and confusion are

always exhibited in the classroom and students are stimulated to respond only by

giving a yes or no answer and statement of facts.

Furthermore, Gultiano33 conducted a study on the “Effects of Strategic

Intervention Material on the Academic Achievements in Chemistry of Public High

School Students”. Results have shown that the strategic intervention materials

are effective in mastering the competency based – skills in chemistry based on

the mean gain scores in the posttests of the experimental and control groups.

Intervention materials contributed to better learning of the concepts among

students. Posttests and maintenance tests indicated that students who were

taught with material employing the causal style of discourse had significantly

better retention of facts and concepts and were superior in applying this

knowledge in problem- solving exercises. The strategic Intervention materials

were effective in teaching competency-based skills. There was significant


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

28

difference between the mean scores in the posttests of the experimental and

control groups. The experimental group performed better in the posttest than the

control group. The experimental and control groups performed at the same level

before the experiment. The two groups of respondents had the same level of

Mental Ability before the treatments.

Dy34 focuses on the preparation, validation and testing of the effectiveness

of Strategic Intervention Materials in Science IV – Physics to the students in

Marcial O. Raňola Memorial School, Guinobatan, Albay. Results shown that the

mean percentage score (MPS) in Science in the Division of Albay in the National

Achievement Test for School Years 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 is below the 75

percent of proficiency level as required in any subject area. The prepared 12

Strategic Intervention Materials in Science IV possess curricular validity.

Furthermore, the achievement of the students in the experimental group who

were exposed to the Strategic Intervention Materials is higher and better

compared to the students taught in the traditional approach both in the first and

second grading periods. Thus, there was a significant difference in the

achievement of the students in the control group and experimental group.

Also, Monge35 conducted a study on the construction and validation of

strategic intervention materials on selected topics in high school chemistry

wherein results shown that the use of strategic intervention materials makes the

learning more meaningful and engaging.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

29

Fernandez36 emphasizes the need for science teachers to consider

strategies which will enhance the development of science process skills through

directed inquiry in the students.

Guanson’s37 study involved the preparation and validation of instructional

modules in teaching Science and Technology III in the Public Secondary Schools

of Iriga City Division. It utilized the descriptive and creative methods of research

in the preparation of instructional modules while its validation was made by

means of curricular and statistical validation technique.

Espinosa38 focused on the study about “Strategic Intervention Material-

Based Instruction, Learning Approach and Students’ Performance in Chemistry”.

This study explored the learning approach adopted and attempted to investigate

the effect of Strategic Intervention Material-Based Instruction (SIM-BI) on the

performance of students in high school Chemistry. It utilized the pretest-posttest

pre-experimental design. The SIM-BI used as a treatment of the study covered

one of the least mastered skills in the subject area which is chemical bonding.

Two classes which consisted of 80 students enrolled in Chemistry during the

fourth quarter of the School Year 2012-2013 were used as respondents. They

were classified according to their learning approach based on their mean scores

in the Chemistry Learning Approach Inventory (CLAI). The score in the

Chemistry Achievement Test (CAT) measured students’ performance in

Chemistry administered as pretest and posttest. Dependent t-test was employed


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

30

to determine the significant difference between the mean responses in the

pretest and posttest. Results of the study showed that the use of SIM-BI is

effective in terms of improving students’ performance and learning approach. The

surface learners performed equally well as the deep learners when SIM-BI is

used. The positive result of the survey suggested that the SIM was appreciated

and appealing to both types of learners.

On the other hand, Ongotan et. al.39 conducted a study about “Strategic

Intervention Material: Improving the level of Academic Performance of Grade 8

Students”. The proponent wondered if the academic performance of the students

will improve through the use of Strategic Intervention Material in the topic,

Factoring Polynomials in Mathematics Grade 8 in Masbate National

Comprehensive High School. The proponent also patterned the activities from

the K to 12 curriculum while transforming the learning process into an enjoyable

reading, problem solving experience and make an impact to their academic

performance.

Salcedo40 conducted a study on construction and validation of instructional

modules in pathophysiology. Findings reveal that the instructional module

facilitates the learning in pathophysiology and strengthen the course since the

module can be used to provide regular instruction and provide an opportunity for

students to develop the skills of independent learning.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

31

Ortega41 focuses on the preparation of reference manual in general

zoology for college students. The study was conducted to identify a better

alternative from the ordinary methods of teaching and to produce learning

manual.

Salvadora42 conducted a study on supplementary learning materials in

teaching biology. In order to create a functional curriculum, instructional materials

center in schools to enhance the teaching-learning process.

Bredderman43 in a study entitled, “Effects of Activity-Based Elementary

Science on Student Outcomes: A Quantitative Synthesis” assailed that, in 57

controlled studies, outcomes were measured in over 900 classrooms; the overall

mean effect size for all outcome areas was .35. The mean effect size was .52 for

science process tests, .16 for science content, and .28 for affective outcomes.

On the average, gains also were realized in creativity, intelligence, language, and

mathematics. Only 3 of 14 coded study features were related to reported effects:

disadvantaged students derived greater benefits that other students; tests not

biased in favor of the activity-based programs resulted in positive but lower

effects than those favoring the activity-based approach; and published reports

had higher effects than unpublished reports. The effects of particular programs

reflect their relative curricular emphases.

Beck44 emphasizes the need to bring science teaching for young people

into functional use calls for a science program that develop skills, habits and
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

32

attitudes that impart information concerning the tools and methods of science. He

further stated that the best science teachers move beyond common sense

realism and utilize the natural curiosity of young people about the physical world.

Hafalla45 contends that the most profound goal of science education is to

develop scientifically literate and concerned individuals who are proficient in the

scientific process.

Hausman46 emphasizing on an effective science education stresses that

science should help develop children’s ability to think, and to use evidence

before jumping to conclusions and to begin developing some of the other more

complex, intellectual skills. Despite all these, still many teachers show negative

attitudes towards the new innovations in science teaching.

Lee47 through a study on “Science Education with English Language

Learners: Synthesis and Research Agenda” published that, the review analyzes

and synthesizes current research on science education with English Language

Learners (ELLs). Science learning outcomes with ELLS are considered in the

context of equitable learning opportunities. Then, theoretical perspectives guiding

the research studies reviewed here are explained, and the methodological and

other criteria for inclusion of these research studies are described. Next, the

literature on science education with ELLs is discussed with regard to science

learning, science curriculum, science instruction, science assessment, and

science teacher education.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

33

Eylon and Linn49 through their study entitled, “Learning and Instruction: An

Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education” was able to

conclude that, recent research in science education examines learning from four

perspectives which was characterized as concept-learning focus, a

developmental focus, a differential focus, and a focus on problem solving. This

study illustrates how these perspectives, considered together offer new insights

into the knowledge and reasoning processes of science students and provide a

framework for identifying mechanisms governing how individuals change their

knowledge and thinking processes.

Lubrico50 evaluated first year high school students on their science

knowledge and finds out that they are inadequate in this field. Many of them have

not developed a scientific outlook in real life situations and there was no effective

carryover of what was previously learned.

Mansour51 in a study entitled, “Challenges to Science-Technology-Society

(STS) Education: Implications for Science Teacher Education” published that, the

findings from the questionnaire and interview revealed a number of factors that

routinely limited teachers’ practices. These limitations were largely noticeable in

their teaching and were emphasized by teachers during the retrospective

discussions of their observed lessons. As a result, most of the teachers in this

study stated that they had to use more transmission methods that they wanted.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

34

Izumi52 believes that while there was much discussion on the elements of

cognitive process linked to effective scientific teaching, less was known about the

nature on assessments targeting processes of scientific reasoning specific to

biology content.

Metz53 through a study entitled, “Reassessment of Developmental

Constraints on Children’s Science Instruction” found out that science curricula at

the elementary school level frequently emphasize the concrete, with a focus on

the processes of observation, ordering, and categorization of the directly

perceivable.

Synthesis of the State-of-the-Art

The previous section provided the researcher with sufficient insights and

comprehensive views gathered from earlier literatures and studies. Published

works of foreign related literatures made by Lam, McKinney, Ornstein, Berger,

Rosenshine, William, Dewey, Kaslan and Store, Japson, and Miller contributed to

the clarity of the study since they all embarked on the importance of the use of

instructional materials for effective learning. Published literatures of local settings

contributed by Rosario, Lardizabal, Tan, Paulsen, Salandanan, Basa, Adiong,

Arena, Villa, The Philippine Star, and the Manila Times also added to the

precision of this study for they reflect the status of science in our country and the

importance of the use of the strategic intervention materials in teaching and

learning process.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

35

The studies of foreign settings made by Beck, Hafalla, Hausman,

Bredderman, Lee, Eylon & Linn, Metz, Lubrico, Mansour, and Izumi also made a

great leap on improving this study for they served as basis in constructing these

strategic intervention materials. The studies of local settings contributed by

Gultiano, Dy, Monge, Fernandez, Guanson, Espinosa, Ongotan et. al., Salcedo,

Ortega, and Salvadora were also found relevant to the present study because

they also made different strategic intervention materials and other learning

materials which are essential for improving the academic achievements of the

students. However, they differed on subjects, settings, statistical tools, and on

the main focus of the research work.

Research Gap

After extensive review of related literature and studies about the present

study, the researcher claims that there have been studies regarding the

construction and validation of strategic intervention materials in one of the four

major areas of science (i.e. Physics, Earth Science, Chemistry, or Biology) but

not specifically in Science 8 which covers all the four major areas anchored on

the spiral curriculum approach of the K to 12 curriculum, thus this gap.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

36

NOTES
1Dr. Nancy T. Pascual, “Impact of Mathematics and Science Instructional
Practices, Curriculum and Academic Achievement to the Career Choice of
Laboratory School Graduates of University of Rizal System – Morong Campus”,
http://www.urs.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/2143-4646-1-PB.pdf, 2014
2Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Enhanced Basic Education
Act of 2013 (Republic Act No. 10533), http://www.gov.ph/2013/09/04/irr-republic-
act-no-10533/, September 4, 2013
3Jocelyn O. Dy, “Strategic Intervention Materials in Teaching Science IV
(Physics): Its Effectiveness”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, 2006
4
DepED Davao City, Division Memorandum No. 1033 s. 2017
5Science Education Realities, Manila Times, Featured Columns, OP-ED
Columns, http://www.manilatimes.net/science-education-realities/100096/, May
28, 2014
6Jeremy Bohonos, Key Theories of Lev Vygotsky and John Dewey:
Implications for Academic Advising Theory, IUPUI Community Learning Network,
September 2012, http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-
Today/View-Articles/Key-Theories-of-Lev-Vygotsky-and-John-Dewey-
Implications-for-Academic-Advising-Theory.aspx
7
Ibid
8The Dick and Carey Model, http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/
history_isd/carey.html
9Fely Navida-Monge, “Construction and Validation of Strategic Intervention
Materials on Selected Topics in High School Chemistry”, University of Saint
Anthony, Iriga City, 2009
10DepED.gov.ph

11http://www.google.com.ph/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=cPKrWL3uI6WM8Qfw5ryQDQ

#q=k+to+12
12study.com/academy/lesson/spiral-curriculum-definition-example.html

13
http://www.google.com.ph/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=cPKrWL3uI6WM8Qfw5ryQDQ
#q=Strategic+Intervention+Materials+(SIM)
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

37
14Science Education Realities, Manila Times, Featured Columns, OP-ED
Columns, http://www.manilatimes.net/science-education-realities/100096/, May
28, 2014
15Mrs. Rosario T. Rodrigo, Importance of Strategic Intervention Materials,
Limay Elementary School, Limay, Bataan, http://udyong.net/teachers-
corner/6925-importance-of-strategic-intervention-materials, October 12, 2015
16IsaganiCruz, The Philippine Star, http://www.philstar.com/education-
and-home/2015/02/19/1425168/instructional-materials-council, February 19,
2015
17Merle C. Tan, “Towards Relevance in Science Education: Philippine
Context”, University of the Philippines Institute for Science and Mathematics
Education Development, Quezon City, Philippines, 2010
18GeraldinePaulsen, “The Different Effectiveness of Activity Approach to
Life Science Among Grade VI Pupils of Three Mental Ability Levels”, University of
Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
19Gloria G. Salandanan, Teaching Science, thefilipinoteacher.com
20P. Arena, The Role of Relevance in Acquisition of Science Process
Skills, Australia Science Teacher Journal
21Carmen V. Basa, “The Problems Met by Teachers in the Teaching of
Science in the Elementary Grades in Tayug, Pangasinan: An Appraisal”,
Dagupan City, 2011
22Paz Loma Adiong, “Science Teachers’ Utilization of Teaching Strategies
and Instructional Materials: Proposals for Improvement”, University of the
Philippines, Baguio City, Philippines, 2010
23Flordeliza D. Villa, Development of Cognitive Learning Skills through
Science Activities, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, 2005
24Carrie Lam, https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/11-habits-effective-
teacher
25RichMcKinney, Moving Beyond the Textbook: Closing the Book on the
Textbook-Dependent Classroom, http://www.wholechildeducation.org/blog/
moving-beyond-the-textbook, May 30, 2013
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

38
26Allan C. Ornstein, “Strategies for Effective Teaching”, New York, Harper
Collins Publisher, pages 319-320
27Charles R. Berger, Building A Learning Orientation,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Berger_(academic)
28Amparo S. Lardizabal et.al., “Principles and Methods of Teaching”,
Phoenix Publishing House, Inc.
29B.Rosenshine, “Teaching Function in M.C. Wittrock”, Education
Handbook of Research on Teaching, New York: Macmillan, 986, pages 376-391
30
R.O. William, What Teaching Method?, Theory in Practice
31
http://www.google.com.ph/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=RPyrWMuDFK2M8Qf-
mJfIAg#q=john+dewey
32Kaslan and Store, Effective Science Teaching, lessonplan.com
33LiliaJapson, A Descriptive Analysis of the Teacher-Student Interaction in
First Year High School Science Classes Studies Science and Mathematics
Classes, Science Education Center
34Angelyn P. Gultiano, “Effects of Strategic Intervention Material on the
Academic Achievements in Chemistry of Public High School Students”,
SPAMAST, Matti, Digos City Campus, http://www.slideshare.
net/neoyen/strategic-intervention-material, February 18, 2012
35Jocelyn O. Dy, “Strategic Intervention Materials in Teaching Science IV
(Physics): Its Effectiveness”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, 2006
36Fely Navida-Monge, “Construction and Validation of Strategic
Intervention Materials on Selected Topics in High School Chemistry”, University
of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, 2009
37Dolores F. Fernandez, “Developing and Assessing Higher Order
Thinking Skills, Monograph 46”, Institute for Science and Mathematics Education,
De La Salle University, Taft Avenue, Manila, 2007
38Goyeta N. Guanson, “Supplementary Instructional Modules in Teaching
Science and Technology III”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City
39Allen A. Espinosa, “Strategic Intervention Material-Based Instruction,
Learning Approach and Students’ Performance in Chemistry”,
https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/10
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

39
40Ronaldo Z. Ongotan, Joanne C. Collantes, Mark Anthony L. Esparza,
Jennifer D. Ramos, Edralin Aban, Racel Santiañez, and Richard F. Lacquin,
“Strategic Intervention Material: Improving the level of Academic Performance of
Grade 8 Students”, http://www.termpaperwarehouse.com/essay-on/Strategic-
Intervention-Material-Improving-The-Level/397459, March 2015
41Maria Laarni M. Salcedo, “Construction and Validation of Instructional
Modules in Pathophysiology”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City
42
Ray B. Ortega, “A Reference Manual in General Zoology”, University of
Saint Anthony, Iriga City
43Agnes B. Salvadora, “Supplementary Learning Materials in Teaching
Biology”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City
44Ted Bredderman, “Effects of Activity-Based Elementary Science on
Student Outcomes: A Quantitative Synthesis”, State University of New York at
Albany, New York, USA, 2010
45William J. Beck, Modern Elementary School Science, New York, USA
46Juliana R. Hafalla, Enhancing the Development of Critical Thinking
Among Natural Science Students, Cambridge Far Eastern University Arts and
Science Review, 2013
47Howard Hausman, Choosing a Science Program of the Elementary
School, Washington D.C., USA
48Okhee Lee, Learners: Synthesis and Research Agenda, University of
Miami, USA, 2012
49Bat-Sheva Eylon and Marcia C. Linn, “Learning and Instruction: An
Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education”, The
Weizmann Institute of Science University of California-Berkeley, California, USA
50Alisa Lubrico, Measurements of Students Understanding on Complex
Scientific Reasoning Problems, University of Massachusetts, 2014
51Nasser Mansour, Challenges to Science-Technology-Society (STS)
Education: Implications for Science Teacher Education, University of Exeter,
United Kingdom and Tanta University, Egypt, 2010
52
San-Lin Izumi, Religion and Science Education in the Minds of Young
Adults, Osaka, Japan, 2014
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

40
53Kathleen E. Mertz, Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on
Children’s Science Institution, University of California, California, USA, 2011
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

41

Chapter 2

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the methods and procedures used in gathering and

interpreting the data needed for the present study. It emphasizes the description

of the research design, respondents of the study, data gathering tools and

instruments used, and the statistical measures employed in the interpretation of

the data.

Research Design

This study used the descriptive-evaluative method of research. It is a type

of research which collects data describing some phenomenon that is may or may

not be quantifiable. The purpose of the research is to evaluate or measure the

results against some known or hypothesized.

Descriptive-evaluative research method also involves the collection of

data to test hypothesis or to answer questions concerning the status of the

subject being studied. It is designed for the investigator to gather information

about the present existing conditions. This study determined first the least

mastered competencies in Science of the Grade 8 students of University of Saint

Anthony, Iriga City School Year 2016-2017 using the teacher-made test. Results

of the test served as the basis in the development of strategic intervention

materials in Science 8.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

42

Respondents

There were two groups of respondents in the study.

The first group consisted of one hundred (100) selected Grade 8 students

of University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City School Year 2016-2017. Table 1 shows

the first group of respondents of the study identified through scientific sampling.

They answered the teacher-made test constructed by the researcher. Results of

the teacher-made test enables the researcher to identify the least mastered

learning competencies in Science 8 and become the basis in developing the

strategic intervention materials.

Table 1
Distribution of Grade 8 Students by Section

SECTION Population Size Sample Size


Sampaguita 40 10
Azalea 39 9
Bougainvillea 40 10
Camellia 40 10
Cattleya 41 10
Daffodil 41 10
Fuchsia 40 10
Geranium 41 10
Hyacinth 42 11
Jasmine 40 10
TOTAL 404 100
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

43

The second group of respondents consisted of ten (10) evaluators: two (2)

Grade 8 Science teachers, two (2) Science department heads, two (2) SIM

writers, two (2) coaches in SIM-making, and two (2) SIM winners who took part in

the validation of the strategic intervention materials. They are experts in science

instruction and know very well how the strategic intervention materials will be

validated. They also provided additional insights on how the strategic intervention

materials are improved.

Data Gathering Tools

The primary data on the least mastered learning competencies in Science

8 in the context of the K to 12 curriculum is gathered by means of the teacher-

made test. For the curricular validation, guidelines in evaluating strategic

intervention materials, provided by the Department of Education shown in

Appendix C, page 169 was utilized.

Preparation of the Teacher-Made Test. The first group of respondents is

given one hundred (100) items multiple choice type of teacher-made test aligned

to the different learning competencies of Science 8 in the context of the K to 12

curriculum. It is checked and validated by other Grade 8 Science teachers for

they are also considered experts in test construction, because they know very

well the different learning competencies in Science 8. The distribution of items in

the teacher-made test with its corresponding learning competency is shown in

Table 2.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

44

Table 2
Distribution of Items in the Teacher-Made Test

NUMBER OF ITEM
LEARNING COMPETENCIES
ITEMS NUMBERS
I. Force, Motion, & Energy
Motion 8 1-8
Work, Power, and Energy 8 9-16
Light and Sound 4 17-20
Heat 5 21-25
II. Earth and Space
Earthquakes and Faults 15 26-40
Understanding Typhoons 5 41-45
Beyond the Earth 5 46-50
III. Matter
Particulate Nature of Matter 10 51-60
Atomic Structure 10 61-70
Periodic Table of Elements 5 71-75
IV. Livings Things
Digestive System 7 76-82
Heredity 8 83-90
Biodiversity 10 91-100

Results of the teacher-made test enabled the researcher to identify the

least mastered learning competencies in Science 8. It also become the basis for

the development of strategic intervention materials. The learning competency per

area in science (i.e. Physics, Earth Science, Chemistry, Biology) with the highest

percentage of incorrect responses has become the basis on the development of

the strategic intervention materials. A sample teacher-made test in Science 8 is

shown in Appendix B, page 165.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

45

Administration of the Teacher-Made Test. Before the teacher-made test

was administered to the intended respondents, a permit to conduct study was

secured from the school principal. Copy of the letter is shown in Appendix A,

page 164. The researcher personally administered, retrieved, and checked the

teacher-made test.

Preliminary. The first step in developing strategic intervention materials is

the acquisition of the least mastered learning competencies in Science 8 in the

context of the K to 12 curriculum through the teacher-made test. Gathering of

data followed for the development of strategic intervention materials.

Development and Preparation. The data gathered is organized

according to the following components of the strategic intervention materials:

Title Card shows at a glance what a intervention material is all about. It

contains terms which directly connect the learner to the concepts to be learned

and skills to be acquired.

Guide Card presents the big picture. It gives an overview of the lesson,

presents the focus skills, engages the learner’s interest, and leads the learner

towards the performance of the tasks.

Activity Card provides the activities or tasks that the learner should

undertake to develop a skill. The activities are drawn from the subtasks taken

from the identified least mastered learning competencies in Science 8.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

46

Assessment Card helps the learner measure his/her level of mastery of

the skill upon completion of the tasks.

Enrichment Card extends learning by providing additional exercises for

further application of knowledge or skill.

Answer Card contains the answers to the questions or problems found in

the activity card, assessment card, and enrichment card. This is a part added by

the researcher to employ self-evaluation and encourage responsibility for self-

learning by the students.

Reference Card provides additional content to the coverage of textbook,

definition of terms, important concepts, or needed illustrations. It may also list

resources that the learner may refer for further reading. The resources may be

books, magazines, other reading materials, and internet resources.

Curricular Validation

This phase includes the curricular validation of the prepared strategic

intervention materials. This include the second group of respondents who has a

broad knowledge about how the strategic intervention materials work. The

respondents were asked to evaluate the materials using the guidelines in

evaluating strategic intervention, based from the standardized criteria prepared

and issued by the Department of as shown in Appendix C, page 169. These

include ten (10) evaluators: two (2) Grade 8 Science teachers, two (2) Science

department heads, two (2) SIM writers, two (2) coaches in SIM-making, and two
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

47

(2) SIM winners, who experts in science instruction and know very well how the

strategic intervention materials will be improved.

Statistical Treatment of the Data

In the determination of the curricular validity of these strategic intervention

materials, the researcher used Calmorin’s formula, frequency count, percentage

technique, and weighted mean.

Calmorin’s Formula1 used when the population is more than 100 and the

researcher decides to utilize scientific sampling. In this study, it is used to get the

sample size of the first group of respondents. The formula was as follows:

NV+[(𝑆e)2 x (1−p)]
Ss =
NSe +[𝑉 2 x p(1−p)]

where:

Ss - sample size

N – population size

V – standard value (2.33) of 2% level of probability

Se – sampling error

p – the largest possible proportion

Frequency count was used to tally the answers of the respondents to an

item in the teacher-made test.

Percentage technique2 was used to determine the proportionate number

of responses to a question in the teacher-made test. It was used for the

researcher to determine the percentage of students who find difficulty in the


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

48

different learning competencies in Science 8. The learning competency per area

in science (i.e. Physics, Earth Science, Chemistry, Biology) with the highest

percentage of incorrect responses has become the basis on the development of

SIM. The formula for percentage technique is shown below:

𝑓
𝑃= 𝑥 100
𝑁

where:

P - percentage

f - frequency

N - total number of respondents

Weighted Mean3 was used to determine the curricular validity of the SIM

prepared as an output of this study. Data was based from the result of the

evaluation of the teachers who answered the guidelines in evaluating SIM

provided by the Department of Education. Below is the formula:

𝑇𝑊𝐹
𝑊𝑀 = 𝑁

where:

WM - weighted mean
TWF - total weighted frequency
N - total number of respondents

The five-point Likert Scale, with the corresponding verbal interpretation

are shown below:


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

49

Scale Interval Scale Interpretation

5 4.20 – 5.00 Very Evident (VE)

4 3.40 – 4.19 Evident (E)

3 2.60 – 3.39 Moderately Evident (ME)

2 1.80 – 2.59 Less Evident (LE)

1 1.00 – 1.79 Not Evident (NE)

The 100-point scale (in percentage), with the corresponding interpretation

shown below, was used to determine the Least Mastered Learning

Competencies. The competency with 61% - 100% of incorrect responses were

considered the least mastered.

Scale Interpretation

81% – 100% Poor (P)

61% – 80% Fair (F)

41% – 60% Good (G)

21% – 40% Very Good (VG)

1% – 20% Excellent (E)


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

50

NOTES
1Amadeo Pangilinan Cristobal Jr., Ed.D. and Maura Consolacion De La
Cruz-Cristobal, Ed.D., Practical Research for Senior High School 2, revised
2017, page 149
2Stephen Bernstein and Ruth Bernstein, Elements of Statistics II:
Inferential Statistics, (Singapore, Mc Graw Hill Co., International Edition, 2002),
page 120
3
Ibid
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

51

Chapter 3

STRATEGIC INTERVENTION MATERIALS IN SCIENCE 8


IN THE CONTEXT OF THE K TO 12 CURRICULUM

This chapter is the presentation, analysis, and interpretation of the least

mastered learning competencies in Science 8 in which the strategic intervention

materials were developed from.

Least Mastered Learning Competencies in Science 8

The first specific problem dealt in this study is the identification of the least

mastered competencies in Science 8. With the advent of K to 12 curriculum and

the introduction of the spiral curriculum approach, Grade 8 students find some of

the topics difficult, especially with a major shift from purely biology for grade 8, it

turned out to be from all the four major areas of science namely: Physics, Earth

Science, Chemistry, and Biology.

Based from the results of the survey conducted through a teacher-made

test answered by the Grade 8 students of University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City

School Year 2016-2017, the learning competency per area in science (i.e.

Physics, Earth Science, Chemistry, Biology) with the highest percentage of

incorrect responses which become the basis of the development of the strategic

intervention materials were as follows:


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

52

Force, Motion, & Energy


Motion

Work, Power, and Energy

Light and Sound

Heat

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Figure 3
Graphical Presentation of the Least Mastered Learning Competencies
in Force, Motion, & Energy for Science 8

The data gathered signify that the least mastered learning competency in

Force, Motion, and Energy based on the results of the teacher-made test is the

topic “Light and Sound”. The data implied that most of the Grade 8 students find

difficulty to master lessons in Light and Sound such as propagation of sound,

visible light, and color. This implication is strengthened when Benchmarks for

Science Literacy1 stated that many middle-school students do not think of light

wave and sound wave as something that travels from one place to another, and

most tend to identify light and sound with its sources. As a result, students have

difficulty explaining how sound propagates, as well as how reflection of light by

objects is made possible. The notion that the eye can see without a link to the

object is a notion that can even persist after basic instruction in optics. Students

therefore, must have a deeper understanding about waves to understand more

the topics on light and sound.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

53

Earth and Space


Earthquakes and Faults

Understanding Typhoons

Beyond the Earth

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Figure 4
Graphical Presentation of the Least Mastered Learning Competencies
in Earth and Space for Science 8

As gleaned from the data stated above, it can be inferred that the least

mastered learning competency in Earth and Space based on the results of the

teacher-made test is the topic “Beyond the Earth”. The data imply that most of

the Grade 8 students find it difficult to master lessons in Beyond the Earth such

as the solar system, the sun, the eight planets, and the other members of the

solar system. This is supported when Russell J. Lowke2 cited in his essay that

the origin of the solar system is one of the oldest unsolved problems in science.

We have yet to model the solar system including the sun, the planets, and other

celestial objects conclusively. We suffer from the same illusion today. Hopefully,

as more is discovered about planets in neighboring systems, and faster

computers utilize more extensive computer models, the origin of the solar system

might become solved. To master the learning competencies on the topic Beyond

the Earth, students must be exposed to varied activities to at least visualize what

our solar system really looks like.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

54

Matter
Particulate Nature of Matter

Atomic Structure

Periodic Table of Elements

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Figure 5
Graphical Presentation of the Least Mastered Learning Competencies
in Matter for Science 8

The data gathered shows that the least mastered learning competency in

Matter based on the results of the teacher-made test is the topic “Periodic Table

of Elements”. The data signify that most of the Grade 8 students find it difficult to

master lessons in Periodic Table of Elements such as the chemical symbols,

arrangement, classification, and uses of the elements in the periodic table. This

implication is supported by the study on Secondary High School Chemistry

Teachers’ Perspectives on the Difficulties of Teaching Atomic Structure and the

Periodic Table: Views from Thailand and Kenya 3 which states that the concepts

in atomic structure and periodic table are difficult to teach because these are

abstract topics and students must imagine a lot to construct an understanding of

things that cannot be seen. The teachers seem not to possess adequate

knowledge to construct their own instructional materials or models to use in

concrete teaching. This means, that students should be provided with more

activities to have a deeper understanding of the topic.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

55

Living Things
Digestive System

Heredity

Biodiversity

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Figure 6
Graphical Presentation of the Least Mastered Learning Competencies
in Living Things for Science 8

The data gathered shows that the least mastered learning competency in

Matter based on the results of the teacher-made test is the topic “Heredity”. The

data signifies that most of the Grade 8 students are finding difficulty to master

lessons in Heredity such as the cell cycle, mitosis, meiosis, and patterns of

Mendelian inheritance. This implication is supported by the post on Teaching

Heredity of Bethany Lau4 that one of the key difficult concepts in the standards is

heredity. There are four main concepts of heredity that are required in the NGSS:

living things have life cycles, plant and animal traits, traits influenced by the

environment, and traits within a population.

Science should be all about fun. In fact, science at all levels of school

should be about curiosity, explorations, and lots of fun. As more and more states

adopt the Next Generation Science Standards (and as other states adopt their

own similar science standards), teachers are looking for new and creative ways

to teach science concepts.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

56

Table 3 shows the summary of the least mastered learning competencies

in Science 8 based from the results of the teacher-made test. It shows what

learning competency per area in science (i.e. Physics, Earth Science, Chemistry,

Biology) has the highest percentage of incorrect responses. This is where the

development of the strategic intervention materials was based.

Table 3
Summary of the Least Mastered Learning Competencies in Science 8

TOTAL
NUMBER OF
ITEMS NUMBER OF
NUMBER % OF
LEARNING COMPETENCIES OF ITEMS
(Number of INCORRECT
INCORRECT
INTERPRETATION
Items X RESPONSES
Number of
Respondents)
I. Force, Motion, & Energy 25
Motion 8 800 376 47% Good
Work, Power, and Energy 8 800 424 53% Good
Light and Sound 4 400 272 68% Fair
Heat 5 500 280 56% Good
II. Earth and Space 25
Earthquakes and Faults 15 1500 610 41% Good
Understanding Typhoons 5 500 180 36% Very Good
Beyond the Earth 5 500 305 61% Fair
III. Matter 25
Particulate Nature of Matter 10 1000 420 42% Good
Atomic Structure 10 1000 510 51% Good
Periodic Table of Elements 5 500 335 67% Fair
IV. Livings Things 25
Digestive System 7 700 280 40% Very Good
Heredity 8 800 488 61% Fair
Biodiversity 10 1000 600 60% Good
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

57

Result shows that the least mastered learning competencies in Science 8

based on the percentage of incorrect responses are the following: Light and

Sound (Physics, 68% - Fair); Periodic Table of Elements (Chemistry, 67% - Fair);

Heredity (Biology, 61% - Fair); and Beyond the Earth (Earth Science, 61% - Fair).

Strategic Intervention Materials in Science 8 in the Context


of the K to 12 Curriculum

The second specific problem in this study is the development of the

strategic intervention materials based from the least mastered learning

competencies in Science 8. This SIM will serve as additional teaching tools to

increase the level of achievement of students.

The strategic intervention material is an instructional material meant to

teach concept or topics which are considered least mastered by the students. It

can give the opportunity to explore various ideas and concepts that would enrich

their understanding of varied subject matters that sharpen their competencies.

Furthermore, the strategic instructional materials tend to re-teach the lessons

which are not so much clear to the learners and to help them gain mastery of the

skills.

Aside from the title card, each intervention material contains six parts such

as the guide card, activity card, assessment card, enrichment card, answer card,

and reference card.

The guide card stimulates the student’s interest on the topic discussed

and gives a preview of what they would learn. The activity card translates the
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

58

focus skills in at least three activities. The assessment card provides exercises,

drills or activities that allow students to assess their understanding of what they

have learned, correct errors when appropriate, monitor their learning, and use

feedback about their progress. The enrichment card provides activities that

reinforces the content of the lesson and provides opportunities for the students to

apply what they have learned to other subject areas or in new contexts. The

answer card contains the answers to the questions or problems found in the

activity card, assessment card, and enrichment card. Finally, the reference card

provides further reading to the students.

The topics of the prepared strategic intervention materials is focused on

the least mastered learning competency per area in science (i.e. Physics, Earth

Science, Chemistry, Biology).

Based from the result of the teacher-made test, the least mastered

learning competencies based on the percentage of incorrect responses are the

following: Light and Sound (Physics, 68% - Fair); Periodic Table of Elements

(Chemistry, 67% - Fair); Heredity (Biology, 61% - Fair); and Beyond the Earth

(Earth Science, 61% - Fair). The organization of the topics of the strategic

intervention materials prepared followed the sequence of topics found in the

Science Links 8 textbook published by REX Bookstore and with reference to the

topics and objectives of Department of Education’s learner’s module on Science

8.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

59

The strategic intervention materials are only a supplementary teaching

tools. It should not be used by the teachers as the main strategy for teaching and

it is only providesd to students who failed to master a learning competency.

Students who passed the evaluation of the teacher after the teaching-learning

process is not to be given these strategic intervention materials.

The strategic intervention materials prepared are organized as follows:

SIM 1: Light and Sound – discusses the propagation of sound, visible

light, and color.

SIM 2: Beyond the Earth – discusses the solar system, the sun, the eight

planets, and the other members of the solar system.

SIM 3: Periodic Table of Elements – discusses the chemical symbol,

arrangement, classification, and uses of the elements in the periodic table.

SIM 4: Heredity – discusses the cell cycle, mitosis, meiosis, and patterns

of Mendelian inheritance.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

60
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

61
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

62
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

63
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

64
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

65
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

66
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

67
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

68
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

69
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

70
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

71
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

72
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

73
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

74
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

75
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

76
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

77
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

78
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

79
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

80
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

81
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

82
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

83
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

84
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

85
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

86
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

87
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

88
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

89
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

90
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

91
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

92
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

93
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

94
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

95
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

96
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

97
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

98
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

99
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

100
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

101
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

102
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

103
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

104
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

105
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

106
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

107
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

108
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

109
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

110
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

111
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

112
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

113
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

114
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

115
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

116
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

117
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

118
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

119
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

120
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

121
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

122
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

123
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

124
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

125
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

126
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

127
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

128
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

129
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

130
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

131
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

132
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

133
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

134
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

135
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

136
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

137
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

138
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

139
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

140
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

141
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

142
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

143
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

144
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

145
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

146
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

147
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

148

Curricular Validation of the


Strategic Intervention Materials in Science 8

Curricular validity5 as defined, is the evidence of test validity shown by

agreement between content and curricular objectives. The validation was done

by the second group of respondents which includes ten (10) evaluators: two (2)

Grade 8 Science teachers, two (2) Science department heads, two (2) SIM

writers, two (2) coaches in SIM-making, and two (2) SIM winners who took part in

the validation of the strategic intervention materials. They are experts in science

instruction and know very well how the strategic intervention materials is

validated. They also provided additional insights on how the strategic intervention

materials are improved.

Results of the curricular validation clearly shows that the strategic

intervention materials in Science 8 constructed by the researcher has contents

that are very evident and suitable as a tool in mastering the least mastered

competencies of the students. The average weighted mean for the SIM on the

guide card is within the very evident range, the same in the activity card,

assessment card, enrichment card, answer card, and reference card. It means

that the constructed strategic intervention materials are truly useful for students’

academic improvement. Table 4 to 9 shows the results of the curricular validation

on the parts of the strategic intervention in Science 8 developed by the

researcher.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

149

Table 4
Curricular Validation on Guide Card

CRITERIA WM INTERPRETATION

GUIDE CARD

1. Gives a preview of what a student will learn. 5.0 Very Evident (VE)
2. Stimulates interest in the topic. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
3. Presents the focus skills that:
a. mentions the learning competency. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)

b. states at least 3 sub tasks (activities). 5.0 Very Evident (VE)


c. builds on prior learning/prerequisite skills. 4.7 Very Evident (VE)
d. mentions the concrete outcome or products
students are expected to demonstrate/produce. 4.8 Very Evident (VE)

4. Cites briefly the activities. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)


5. Challenges the learner in performing the tasks. 4.7 Very Evident (VE)
AVERAGE WM 4.86 Very Evident (VE)

The average weighted mean for the curricular validation on guide card is

4.86 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Criterion numbers: 1.

Gives a preview of what a student will learn; and 3b. States at least 3

subtasks/activities, got the highest weighted mean of 5.0 with a verbal

interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Followed by criterion numbers 2, 3a, and 4

with 4.9 weighted mean or Very Evident (VE). Criterion number 3d. Mentions the

concrete outcome or products students are expected to demonstrate/produce,

got a weighted mean of 4.8 with a verbal interpretation also of Very Evident (VE).

And lastly, criterion numbers: 3c. Builds on prior learning/prerequisite skills; and
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

150

criterion number 5. Challenges the learner in performing the tasks got the lowest

weighted mean of 4.7, but still with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE).

This process was found similar to the one postulated by Soriano6 on

module preparation. While this is called strategic intervention materials and the

parts are refereed as cards, but the descriptors are similar. Soriano postulated

that the module is based on management principle, hence, the various lessons

also follow the POLE (Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Evaluating) formula.

This is for easy understanding and good appreciation of the module, the

instructional material has the following modular elements in each lesson:

objective, lesson abstract, lesson introduction, sticklers, in-text questions,

summary, space and assignment, and self-testing.

Meaningful learning will only occur when education provides experience

that requires students to connect knowledge across the three domains either

cognitive, affective, or psychomotor domain. It underlies the constructive

integration of thinking, feeling, and acting, leading to human empowerment for

commitment and responsibility.

This means that the science teacher must design a learning experience

which will attend to the three domains. Science students must have an

understanding and a commitment to the requisite conditions for meaningful

learning.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

151
Table 5
Curricular Validation on Activity Card

CRITERIA WM INTERPRETATION
ACTIVITY CARD
1. Translates the focus skills into at least 3 activities. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
2. Provide activities that:
a. are organized based on the sequence of the 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
focus skills (in the Guide Card).
b. have clear directions. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
c. provide examples to concretize the concepts,
5.0 Very Evident (VE)
particularly those drawn from real-life experience.
d. students can complete independently, in pairs,
4.8 Very Evident (VE)
or in groups.
e. allow students to make discoveries and
4.9 Very Evident (VE)
formulate ideas on their own.
f. guides and challenges student’s thinking and
4.8 Very Evident (VE)
learning.
g. uses local data and situations. 4.8 Very Evident (VE)
3. Provides transition statements that recognize
4.7 Very Evident (VE)
students’ accomplishment.
4. Provides questions that:
5.0 Very Evident (VE)
a. guide the development of concepts/focus skills.
b. elicit the message or meaning that a student can
4.9 Very Evident (VE)
take away from an activity/experience.
c. elicit an explanation, not in one word answers. 5.0 Very Evident (VE)
d. establish the relationship between the lessons
4.9 Very Evident (VE)
and what students already know.
e. develop the skills in the three domains. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
AVERAGE WM 4.89 Very Evident (VE)

The average weighted mean for the curricular validation on activity card is

4.89 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Criterion numbers 2c, 4a,

and 4c got the highest weighted mean of 5.0 with a verbal interpretation of Very

Evident (VE). Criterion number 3 got the lowest weighted mean of 4.7 (VE).
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

152

These data are supported by Transformation Learning Theory of Wink 7, that

it is important for science educators to recognize the fact that students who

cannot solve certain problems are the ones who lacks knowledge. Thus, they

must be provided with different activities to cater their individual differences to

achieve the best learning.

Table 6
Curricular Validation on Assessment Card

CRITERIA WM INTERPRETATION
ASSESSMENT CARD
1. Provide exercises that allow students to:
a. assess their understanding of what they have 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
learned and correct errors when appropriate.
b. monitor their learning and use feedback about
4.8 Very Evident (VE)
their progress.
2. Formulated in standard test format to give students
4.8 Very Evident (VE)
practice in test-taking techniques.
3. Give clear directions. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
4. Provides an answer key (in a separate card). 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
AVERAGE WM 4.86 Very Evident (VE)

The average weighted mean for the curricular validation on assessment

card is 4.86 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Criterion numbers:

1a. Provide exercises that allow students to assess their understanding of what

they have learned and correct errors when appropriate; 3. Give clear directions;

and 4. Provides an answer key in a separate card, got the highest weighted

mean of 4.9 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). And Criterion
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

153

numbers: 1b. Monitor their learning and use feedback about their progress; and

2. Formulated in standard test format to give students practice in test-taking

techniques, got the lowest weighted mean of 4.8 but still with a verbal

interpretation of Very Evident (VE).

These data are supported by the Novak’s Theory of Human Constructivism

cited by Bretz8 which gives the “irreducible commonplace” – the evaluation.

Evaluation is obviously important in measuring learning outcomes. It means that

students must be given the right evaluation to assess their level of

understanding.

Table 7
Curricular Validation on Enrichment Card

CRITERIA WM INTERPRETATION
ENRICHMENT CARD
1. Provides activities that reinforce the content of the
4.8 Very Evident (VE)
lesson.
2. Provides opportunity for students to:
a. apply what they have learned to other subject 4.8 Very Evident (VE)
areas in a new context.
b. work independently or in groups to explore
answers to their own questions. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)

AVERAGE WM 4.83 Very Evident (VE)

The average weighted mean for the curricular validation on enrichment card

is 4.83 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Criterion number 2b.

Provides opportunity for students to work independently or in groups to explore

answers on their own questions, got the highest weighted mean of 4.9 with a
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

154

verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). While, criterion numbers: 1. Provides

activities that reinforce the content of the lesson; and 2a. Provides opportunity for

students to apply what they have learned to other subject areas in a new context,

got the lowest weighted mean of 4.8, but still with a verbal interpretation of Very

Evident (VE).

This is also found similar to the study of Caculitan9 wherein the prepared

instructional material was rated excellent by the teacher-evaluators in terms of

overview, objectives, topics, activities, and evaluation materials, thus the said

instructional material was found curricularly valid hence, it could be used as

instructional material in the classroom.

Table 8
Curricular Validation on Answer Card

CRITERIA WM INTERPRETATION

ANSWER CARD
1. Provides complete answers in sequential order. 4.9 Very Evident (VE)
2. The answer card is easy to understand. 5.0 Very Evident (VE)
3. Appropriate for checking the activity card,
assessment card, and enrichment card. 5.0 Very Evident (VE)
AVERAGE WM 4.97 Very Evident (VE)

The average weighted mean for the curricular validation on answer card is

4.97 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Criterion numbers: 2. The

answer card is easy to understand; and 3. Appropriate for checking the activity

card, assessment card, and enrichment card, got the highest weighted mean of
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

155

5.0 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). While, criterion number 1.

Provides complete answers in sequential order, got the lowest weighted mean of

4.9, but still with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE).

This finding agrees with Deocariza wherein the Workbooks in Science III

that was developed was found to be effective in enhancing students’

achievement in Science III, practical skills, and positive attitude towards practical

work. It also has answer cards that provide answers on different activities on the

workbook.
Table 9
Curricular Validation on Reference Card

CRITERIA WM INTERPRETATION
REFERENCE CARD
1. Provides readings that relate content with students’
4.9 Very Evident (VE)
life experiences.
2. Provides a carefully researched list of resources
that: 4.8 Very Evident (VE)
a. will reinforce concepts/skills learned.
b. provide additional content not found in the
4.8 Very Evident (VE)
textbook.
c. student may refer to further reading. 4.8 Very Evident (VE)
AVERAGE WM 4.83 Very Evident (VE)

The average weighted mean for the curricular validation on reference card

is 4.83 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Criterion number 1.

Provides readings that relate content with students’ life experiences, got the

highest weighted mean of 4.9 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE).
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

156

While, criterion numbers: 2a. Provides a carefully researched list of resources

that will reinforce concepts/skills learned; 2b. Provides a carefully researched list

of resources that provide additional content not found in the textbook; and 2c.

Provides a carefully researched list of resources that student may refer to further

reading, got the lowest weighted mean of 4.8, but still with a verbal interpretation

of Very Evident (VE). These data are found related Brophy’s10 statement that

learning is fun and exciting, at least when the curriculum is well matched to

students’ interests and abilities and the teachers emphasizes hands-on activities

and additional references for further readings.

Table 10
Summary of the Curricular Validation on
Strategic Intervention Materials in Science 8

PARTS OF THE SIM AWM INTERPRETATION


Guide Card 4.86 Very Evident (VE)
Activity card 4.89 Very Evident (VE)
Assessment Card 4.86 Very Evident (VE)
Enrichment Card 4.83 Very Evident (VE)
Answer Card 4.97 Very Evident (VE)
Reference Card 4.83 Very Evident (VE)
OVERALL WM 4.87 Very Evident (VE)

Table 10 shows the summary of curricular validation on strategic

intervention materials in Science 8 constructed by the researcher. The overall

weighted mean for the curricular validation of the SIM is 4.87 with a verbal

interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Answer Card is the part of the SIM that got
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

157

the highest average weighted mean of 4.97 with a verbal interpretation of Very

Evident (VE). The Activity Card got an average weighted mean of 4.89 with a

verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). While other parts of the SIM such as

the Guide Card and Assessment Card got an average weighted mean of 4.86

which is interpreted as Very Evident (VE). Enrichment Card and Reference Card

got the lowest average weighted mean of 4.83, but still with a verbal

interpretation of Very Evident (VE).

Results of the curricular validation clearly shows that the strategic

intervention materials in Science 8 constructed by the researcher has contents

that are very evident and suitable as a tool in mastering the least mastered

competencies of the students. This process was found similar to the study of

Dy11 on Strategic Intervention Materials in Science IV (Physics). The average

weighted mean for the SIM on the guide card is within the very evident range, the

same in the activity card, assessment card, enrichment card, answer card, and

reference card. It means that the SIM is truly useful for students’ academic

improvement. Hence, the strategic intervention materials in Science 8 is

curricularly valid and can now be used by the teachers and be given to the

students to improve their learning competencies in Science 8.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

158

NOTES
1Benchmarks for Science Literacy: Project 20161 – The American
Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 338-339,
http://project2061.aaas.org/tools/benchol/bolframe.html
2Lowke, Russell J., Research Essay “On the Origin of the Solar System”,
May 9, 2011
3
Panwilai Chomchid – Kasetsart University, Justus Inyega – Kenya
Science Teachers College, Norman Thomson – University of Georgia,
“Secondary High School Chemistry Teachers’ Perspectives on the Difficulties of
Teaching Atomic Structure and the Periodic Table: Views from Thailand and
Kenya”, 2013
4Lau, Bethany, “Minds in Bloom”, United States of America,
https://www.britannica.com
5Fely Navida-Monge, “Construction and Validation of Strategic Intervention
Materials on Selected Topics in High School Chemistry”, University of Saint
Anthony, Iriga City, 2009
6Soriano, Robert, Broadcast Management: A Course Module for College
Students, Manila: Bookstore Publishing Corporation, revised 2010
7Wink, Donald J., “Reconstructing Student Meaning: A Theory of
Perspective Transformation”, 2012
8Bretz, Stacey L., Journal of Chemical Education Online Symposium,
August 2011
9Caculitan, Edith P., “A College Resource Book in Earth Science: Its
Utilization and Effectiveness”, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Saint Anthony,
Iriga City
10Brophy,Jere, Motivating Students to Learn, United States of America,
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2012
11Jocelyn O. Dy, “Strategic Intervention Materials in Teaching Science IV
(Physics): Its Effectiveness”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, 2006
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

159

Chapter 4

SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter is the summary of the methods and procedures adopted in

this study, together with the findings and conclusions from which the

recommendations were drawn.

Summary

The researcher aims to develop Strategic Intervention Materials in

Science 8 in the context of the K to 12 curriculum. Specifically, it sought answers

to the following questions: 1. What are the least mastered learning competencies

in Science 8 based from the results of the teacher-made test?; 2. What strategic

intervention materials can be developed based from the least mastered learning

competencies in Science 8?; 3. Is the developed strategic intervention materials

for Science 8 curricularly valid?

This study was premised on the following assumptions: 1. There are least

mastered learning competencies in Science 8.; 2. Strategic Intervention Materials

can be developed based from the least mastered learning competencies in

Science 8.; 3. The developed strategic intervention materials in Science 8 are

curricularly valid, based from the guidelines in evaluating strategic intervention

materials prepared and issued by the Department of Education.

There were two groups of respondents in the study. The first group

consisted of one hundred (100) selected Grade 8 students of University of Saint


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

160

Anthony, Iriga City School Year 2016-2017. The second group of respondents

consisted of ten (10) evaluators: two (2) Grade 8 Science teachers, two (2)

Science department heads, two (2) SIM writers, two (2) coaches in SIM-making,

and two (2) SIM winners who took part in the validation of the strategic

intervention materials.

In the determination of the curricular validity of these strategic intervention

materials, the researcher used Calmorin’s formula, frequency count, percentage

technique, and weighted mean.

Findings

The study yielded the following salient findings:

1. The least mastered learning competencies in Science 8 based on the

percentage of incorrect responses are the following: Light and Sound (Physics,

68% - Fair); Periodic Table of Elements (Chemistry, 67% - Fair); Heredity

(Biology, 61% - Fair); and Beyond the Earth (Earth Science, 61% - Fair).

2. The strategic intervention materials that was developed based from the

least mastered learning competencies in Science 8 contains the following topics:

Light and Sound, Beyond the Earth, Periodic Table of Elements, and Heredity. It

may be used as a tool in understanding the least mastered learning

competencies of the students in Grade 8 for the improvement of their academic

performance.
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

161

3. The developed strategic intervention materials for Science 8 was

curricularly valid. The overall weighted mean for the curricular validation of the

SIM is 4.87 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Answer Card is the

part of the SIM that got the highest average weighted mean of 4.97 with a verbal

interpretation of Very Evident (VE). The Activity Card got an average weighted

mean of 4.89 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). While other parts

of the SIM such as the Guide Card and Assessment Card got an average

weighted mean of 4.86 which is interpreted as Very Evident (VE). Enrichment

Card and Reference Card got the lowest average weighted mean of 4.83, but still

with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE). Results showed that the SIM

has contents that are very evident and are curricularly valid.

Conclusions

Based from the findings, the following conclusions were drawn:

1. The least mastered learning competencies in Science 8 curriculum were

the following: in Physics, the topic “Light and Sound”; in Earth Science, the least

mastered is on the topic “Beyond the Earth”; while in Chemistry, students find

difficulty on the topic “Periodic Table of Elements”; and lastly, in Biology, the least

mastered topic is “Heredity”.

2. A strategic intervention materials was developed based from the least

mastered learning competencies in Science 8. This SIM may be used as a tool

for better understanding of the lesson.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

162

3. The developed strategic intervention materials in Science 8 has

undergone curricular validation. The overall weighted mean for the curricular

validation of the SIM is 4.87 with a verbal interpretation of Very Evident (VE).

Recommendations

In the light of the findings and conclusions of the study, the following

recommendations were drawn:

1. The teachers in Science 8 should focus on the topics which are least

mastered by the students. They should re-teach difficult concepts and devise

concrete instructional materials to augment learning.

2. The heads of schools should encourage teachers to utilize instructional

materials to facilitate instruction, increase retention of lessons, and enhance

competencies of difficult concepts.

3. As a support instructional material in teaching Science 8, the researcher

finds it viable that the prepared SIM be used by the Grade 8 Science teachers, in

both public and private schools.


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

163

BIBLIOGRAPHY
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

164

A. BOOKS
Beck, William J., Modern Elementary School Science, New York, USA
Bernstein, Ruth and Bernstein, Stephen, Elements of Statistics II:
Inferential Statistics, Singapore, Mc Graw Hill Co., International Edition, 2002
Cristobal, Amadeo Jr. Pangilinan, Ed.D. and Maura Consolacion De La
Cruz-Cristobal, Ed.D., Practical Research for Senior High School 2, revised 2017
Lardizabal, Amparo S. et.al., “Principles and Methods of Teaching”,
Phoenix Publishing House, Inc.
McKinney, Rich, Moving Beyond the Textbook: Closing the Book on the
Textbook-Dependent Classroom, May 30, 2013, http://www.wholechildeducation
.org/blog/moving-beyond-the-textbook
Ornstein, Allan C. “Strategies for Effective Teaching”, New York, Harper
Collins Publisher
Rosenshine, B., “Teaching Function in M.C. Wittrock”, Education
Handbook of Research on Teaching, New York: Macmillan, 986.
William, RO, What Teaching Method?, Theory in Practice

B. JOURNALS, PERIODICALS, AND PAPERS


Arena, P., The Role of Relevance in Acquisition of Science Process Skills,
Australia Science Teacher Journal
Bohonos, Jeremy, Key Theories of Lev Vygotsky and John Dewey:
Implications for Academic Advising Theory, IUPUI Community Learning Network,
September 2012, http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-
Today/View-Articles/Key-Theories-of-Lev-Vygotsky-and-John-Dewey-
Implications-for-Academic-Advising-Theory.aspx
Cruz, Isagani, The Philippine Star, http://www.philstar.com/education-and-
home/2015/02/19/1425168/instructional-materials-council, February 19, 2015
Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Enhanced Basic Education
Act of 2013 (Republic Act No. 10533), September 4, 2013
http://www.gov.ph/2013/09/04/irr-republic-act-no-10533/
Salandanan, Gloria G., Teaching Science, thefilipinoteacher.com
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

165

Science Education Realities, Manila Times, Featured Columns, OP-ED


Columns, May 28, 2014, http://www.manilatimes.net/science-education-
realities/100096/
Tan, Merle C., “Towards Relevance in Science Education: Philippine
Context”, University of the Philippines Institute for Science and Mathematics
Education Development, Quezon City, Philippines, 2010
C. UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
Adiong, Paz Loma, “Science Teachers’ Utilization of Teaching Strategies
and Instructional Materials: Proposals for Improvement”, University of the
Philippines, Baguio City, Philippines, 2010
Basa, Carmen V., “The Problems Met by Teachers in the Teaching of
Science in the Elementary Grades in Tayug, Pangasinan: An Appraisal”,
Dagupan City, 2011
Bredderman, Ted, “Effects of Activity-Based Elementary Science on
Student Outcomes: A Quantitative Synthesis”, State University of New York at
Albany, New York, USA, 2010
Dy, Jocelyn O., “Strategic Intervention Materials in Teaching Science IV
(Physics): Its Effectiveness”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, 2006
Espinosa, Allen A., “Strategic Intervention Material-Based Instruction,
Learning Approach and Students’ Performance in Chemistry”,
https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/10
Eylon, Bat-Sheva, et.al., “Learning and Instruction: An Examination of
Four Research Perspectives in Science Education”, The Weizmann Institute of
Science University of California-Berkeley, California, USA
Fernandez, Dolores F., “Developing and Assessing Higher Order Thinking
Skills, Monograph 46”, Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, De La
Salle University, Taft Avenue, Manila, 2007
Guanson, Goyeta N., “Supplementary Instructional Modules in Teaching
Science and Technology III”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City
Gultiano, Angelyn P., “Effects of Strategic Intervention Material on the
Academic Achievements in Chemistry of Public High School Students”,
SPAMAST, Matti, Digos City Campus, February 18, 2012,
http://www.slideshare.net/neoyen/strategic-intervention-material
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

166

Hafalla, Juliana R., Enhancing the Development of Critical Thinking


Among Natural Science Students, Cambridge Far Eastern University Arts and
Science Review, 2013
Hausman, Howard, Choosing a Science Program of the Elementary
School, Washington D.C., USA
Izumi, San-Lin, Religion and Science Education in the Minds of Young
Adults, Osaka, Japan, 2014
Japson, Lilia, A Descriptive Analysis of the Teacher-Student Interaction in
First Year High School Science Classes Studies Science and Mathematics
Classes, Science Education Center
Lee, Okhee, Learners: Synthesis and Research Agenda, University of
Miami, USA, 2012
Lubrico, Alisa, Measurements of Students Understanding on Complex
Scientific Reasoning Problems, University of Massachusetts, 2014
Mansour, Nasser, Challenges to Science-Technology-Society (STS)
Education: Implications for Science Teacher Education, University of Exeter,
United Kingdom and Tanta University, Egypt, 2010
Mertz, Kathleen E., Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on
Children’s Science Institution, University of California, California, USA, 2011
Monge, Fely Navida, “Construction and Validation of Strategic Intervention
Materials on Selected Topics in High School Chemistry”, University of Saint
Anthony, Iriga City, 2009
Ongotan, Ronaldo Z. et.al., “Strategic Intervention Material: Improving the
level of Academic Performance of Grade 8 Students”, March 2015,
http://www.termpaperwarehouse.com/essay-on/Strategic-Intervention-Material-
Improving-The-Level/397459
Pascual, Nancy T., “Impact of Mathematics and Science Instructional
Practices, Curriculum and Academic Achievement to the Career Choice of
Laboratory School Graduates of University of Rizal System – Morong Campus”,
http://www.urs.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/2143-4646-1-PB.pdf, 2014
Paulsen, Geraldine, “The Different Effectiveness of Activity Approach to
Life Science Among Grade VI Pupils of Three Mental Ability Levels”, University of
Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

167

Rodrigo, Rosario T., Importance of Strategic Intervention Materials, Limay


Elementary School, Limay, Bataan, October 12, 2015,
http://udyong.net/teachers-corner/6925-importance-of-strategic-intervention-
materials
Salcedo, Maria Laarni M. “Construction and Validation of Instructional
Modules in Pathophysiology”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City
Salvadora, Agnes B., “Supplementary Learning Materials in Teaching
Biology”, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City
Villa, Flordeliza D., Development of Cognitive Learning Skills through
Science Activities, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, 2005
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

168

APPENDICES
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

169

APPENDIX A

PERMIT TO CONDUCT STUDY

REMELITA G. FRAGINAL
High School Principal
University of Saint Anthony
Iriga City

Madam:

The undersigned is currently conducting a study entitled “STRATEGIC


INTERVENTION MATERIALS IN SCIENCE 8 IN THE CONTEXT OF THE K TO 12
CURRICULUM”, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts
in Education, major in Science at University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City.
In this regard, may I have the honor to seek permission from your office to
conduct a survey on the least mastered learning competencies in Science 8 through a
teacher-made test among the one hundred (100) selected Grade 8 students of your
prestigious school. Please rest assured that all data will be treated with utmost
confidentiality. I would deeply appreciate the attention given to this request.
May God continuously bless you in all your undertakings.

Respectfully yours,

(Sgd) ATHINA M. LACBAY


Researcher
Noted by:

(Sgd) DR. DOMINGO R. ORTEGA JR.


Dean, Graduate Studies and Research

Approved by:

(Sgd) MRS. REMELITA G. FRAGINAL


High School Principal
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

170

APPENDIX B
TEACHER-MADE TEST IN SCIENCE 8
NAME: ___________________________________________ SECTION: _______________

INSTRUCTIONS: Read each item carefully. Choose the correct answer then write the letter on the space provided for
before the number.

I. Force, Motion, and Energy


____1. Which of the following is FALSE regarding a car moving forward at constant speed in straight line?
A. The net force acting on the car is zero. B. The car also has constant velocity.
C. The car also has constant acceleration. D. None of the above.
____2. Which of the following is FALSE regarding inertia?
A. It is solely dependent upon mass.
B. It is the tendency of an object to resists changes in motion.
C. The more mass an object has, the more inertia it has.
D. None of the above
____3. What is the force exerted by a surface as an object makes an effort to move across it?
A. applied force B. normal force C. friction force D. spring force
____4. The vector sum of forces that act on an object is called ____________.
A. inertia B. gravitational force C. net force D. normal force
____5. What is the maximum static friction that occurs during an impending motion state?
A. coefficient B. kinetic friction C. starting friction D. normal force
____6. What is the support force exerted upon an object which is in contact with another stable object?
A. applied force B. normal force C. frictional force D. spring force
____7. Which of the following is FALSE regarding tensional force?
A. The direction of the force is always away from the object.
B. It is always directed towards the object and acts perpendicularly.
C. It is the force which is transmitted through a rope or wire when pulled at each end.
D. The force is directed along the wire and pulls equally on the objects on either end.
____8. How much acceleration could John provide a 5-kg crate by pushing it with 35-N force?
A. 7 m/s2 B. 175 m/s2 C. 0.14 m/s2 D. 3 m/s2
____9. Marie is dragging her suitcase to the baggage counter. This example shows what type of work?
A. Positive Work B. Negative Work C. Zero Work D. none of these
____10. Which of the following is NOT a unit of power?
A. Nm/s2 B. Nm/s C. J/s D. W
____11. Which is NOT a function of machines?
A. increasing the speed of force B. transferring the direction of force
C. increasing the amount of force D. none of the above
____12. It is the ratio of the useful output energy to the input energy.
A. MA B. Mechanical Work C. Efficiency D. IMA
____13. Peter does 2,400 J of work in climbing the stairs in 2.5 minutes. Determine the power output done.
A. 960 Watts B. 0.0625 Watts C. 6,000 Watts D. 16 Watts
____14. It is the energy that depends on the height of an object relative to its position or reference point.
A. Elastic PE B. Kinetic Energy C. Gravitational PE D. Potential Energy
____15. What is the kinetic energy of a 5,500 N car which is moving at 35 m/s?
A. 9,821.43 J B. 192,500 J C. 96,250 J D. 343,750J
____16. Which of the following is NOT true regarding potential energy?
A. The higher the mass of an object, the greater the potential energy.
B. The higher the height of an object from the ground, the higher the potential energy.
C. Potential energy is lower than kinetic energy for an object at rest.
D. All of the above
____17. If a boy is running toward a source of sound frequency, what kind of frequency will the boy hear?
A. higher B. lower C. equal D. none of these
____18. In which medium is sound likely to travel faster?
A. juice B. rubber band C. clouds D. none of these
____19. In fiction movies, sound travels through the universe. Is this a correct depiction of sound?
A. YES B. NO
____20. According to their wavelength, what color is said to be the least bent?
A. violet B. red C. green D. blue
____21. A temperature of 250°F is almost exactly equivalent to _______.
A. 482°C B. 120°C C. 218°C D. 450°C
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

171
____22. These are substances in thermometer that reacts to changes in temperature.
A. thermal substances B. thermo substances
C. thermometric substances D. thermostat substances
____23. Water boils in temperature equivalent to _______.
A. 373 K B. 273 K C. -100 K D. 32 K
____24. It refers to the point where the substance has absolutely no energy to give up.
A. boiling point B. freezing point C. absolute zero D. absolute scale
____25. He used absolute zero as the lowest possible temperature.
A. Fahrenheit B. Celsius C. Kelvin D. Rankine
II. Earth and Space
____26. According to this theory, the earth initially has one single continent and broke off to several pieces
which became the continents of today.
A. Continental Drift B. Elastic Rebound C. Sea-floor Spreading D. Plate Tectonics
____27. Which of the following describes the aftershocks correctly?
A. The aftershocks happen before the main shock.
B. The aftershocks are small earthquakes after the giant quake.
C. The aftershocks are the energy penetrating the earth.
D. The aftershocks can give predictions about the earthquake.
____28. In what layer of the earth’s interior is where most of the internal heat of the earth is circulated and
may divide plate tectonic processes?
A. Crust B. Mantle C. Outer Core D. Inner Core
____29. Which of the following places was devastated by a magnitude 7.2 earthquake on October 2013?
A. Cebu B. Bohol C. Mindoro D. Panay
____30. Which active fault line when moved can affect areas of Luzon Sea, Mindoro Strait, and Panay Gulf?
A. Central Philippine Fault B. Western Philippine Fault
C. Eastern Philippine Fault D. Southern Philippine Fault
____31. Which of the following statements is FALSE?
A. Analysis of the seismograph reveals information about the earth’s interior.
B. P-waves are known for being the fastest waves but become slower when they travel in fluids.
C. P- and S-waves vary in terms of velocity and effect on rock masses where they pass through.
D. Velocity of the P-waves depends on the rigidity of the material.
____32. The region of the upper mantle which is involved in movement of plate tectonics is called _______.
A. Epicenter B. Asthenosphere C. Plate Boundaries D. Mohorovicic
____33. The region on the earth’s surface where violent earthquake is felt is called _________.
A. Crust B. Epicenter C. Focus D. Mantle
____34. It is an area where 75% of the world’s active volcanoes are found.
A. Equator B. Pacific Ocean C. Earthquake Belt D. South Pacific Belt
____35. The ratification of the name “West Valley Fault” was done under the supervision of _____________.
A. Jeffrey Perez B. Francis Tolentino C. Raymundo Punongbayan D. Teresita Bacolcol
____36. Which of the following cannot be used as indicator of an approaching earthquake?
A. The animals have a strange behavior. B. Prediction of a fortune-teller.
C. The place is situated on a fault line. D. The place has experienced violent earthquakes
____37. Which type of earthquake occurs between 0-70 km below the ground?
A. Shallow Focus B. Deep Focus C. Intra-plate Focus D. Intermediate Focus
____38. Which government agency in the Philippines monitors the earthquake?
A. PHIVOLCS B. DOST C. PAGASA D. DENR
____39. Who invented the first seismograph?
A. John Milne B. Charles Ritcher C. Giuseppe Mercalli D. Cheng Heng
____40. In this fault, the blocks of rocks on one side of the fault slide past the other horizontally.
A. Normal Fault B. Reverse Fault C. Thrust Fault D. Transform Fault
____41. The most active basin for the formation of tropical cyclone is the ______________?
A. Northeastern Pacific Ocean B. Southeastern Pacific Ocean
C. Northwestern Pacific Ocean D. Southwestern Pacific Ocean
____42. Which of the following can weaken the typhoon?
A. Low vertical wind shear B. Ocean water with 20 degrees Celsius
C. High humid area D. Presence of ITCZ
____43. Which of the following is not a requirement in the formation of a storm?
A. Greater amount of water vapor in the air B. Strong vertical wind shear that is less than 10 m/s
C. A preexisting low level of disturbance D. Enough Coriolis force to deflect converging wind
____44. It is a discrete weather system of clouds and thunderstorms, with a circulation intact for 24 hours.
A. Typhoon B. Tropical Storm C. Tropical Depression D. Tropical Disturbance
____45. In 2021, the first typhoon that will hit the Philippines will be named ________________.
A. Agaton B. Amang C. Ambo D. Auring
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

172
____46. These are regions where the sun’s magnetic field is concentrated, thus, the area becomes cooler.
A. Granules B. Faculae C. Sunspots D. Solar Prominences
____47. This theory states that the universe originated from the severely destructive explosion.
A. Planetisimal B. Big Bang Theory C. Nebular Hypothesis D. Companion Star Theory
____48. Who proposed that the universe came from a swirling, vast, saucer-shaped nebula?
A. Fred Hoyle B. George Comte deBuffon C. Marquis De Laplace D. Edwin Hubble
____49. A yellow dwarf star like the sun, has a life span of?
A. 4.6 billion years B. 5 billion years C. 11 billion years D. 11.5 billion years
____50. What is the outermost layer of the sun which consists of hot gases which arc from the solar disc?
A. Photosphere B. Chromosphere C. Corona D. Solar Prominence
III. Matter
____51. Which of the following phases of matter does NOT have definite shape and volume?
A. Solid B. Liquid C. Gas D. Liquid and Gas
____52. Ice cubes float on water because?
A. Liquids have densities that vary. B. Water is less dense as a solid than it is as a liquid.
C. Liquids have greater density than solids. D. None of the above.
____53. The movement of the molecules that exerts a force over a given area is known as ____________.
A. Pressure B. Capillarity C. Density D. Surface Tension
____54. Which of the following is NOT true about the Kinetic Molecular Theory of Matter?
A. Particles in motion have KE and their motion decreases as they gain energy.
B. There is a transfer of energy between particles as they collide with each other.
C. Molecular motion is greatest in gases, less in liquids, and least in solids.
D. Collisions between these particles are perfectly elastic.
____55. Which of the following states of matter is created by cooling a cloud of 500,000 potassium-40 atoms
to less than a millionth of a degree above absolute zero?
A. Gas B. Plasma C. BEC D. Fermionic Condensate
____56. It is the temperature at which liquid is changed into crystalline solid.
A. Boiling point B. Critical point C. Freezing point D. Triple point
____57. It is the process by which substance changes from a gas to a solid without changing into liquid.
A. Condensation B. Deposition C. Melting D. Sublimation
____58. It is the process by which liquid changes to gas or vapor that occurs only on the surface of a liquid.
A. Condensation B. Evaporation C. Sublimation D. Vaporization
____59. When ice cube is placed in a glass of water, it melts. Why?
A. Water has higher temperature than ice. B. Heat energy flows from the water to the ice.
C. Heat transfers from a high temp to low temp D. All of the above.
____60. Dry ice change directly from solid phase to gas phase. This process is called ________.
A. Condensation B. Evaporation C. Deposition D. Sublimation
____61. According to him, all matter was made up of tiny individual units called atoms which are indivisible.
A. John Tyndall B. John Dalton C. Joseph Proust D. Marie Curie
____62. Marie and Pierre Curie discovered two radioactive elements, the ________ and Polonium.
A. Radon B. Radium C. Curium D. Chromium
____63. It is a pure substance that cannot be separated into simpler substances.
A. Element B. Molecule C. Compound D. Solution
____64. Which of the following is false regarding suspensions?
A. Heterogeneous B. Particles settle out C. Do not scatter light D. Can be filtered
____65. Upon observation, it was found out that a substance has a pH less than 7; which can you conclude regarding the
characteristics of this substance?
A. It can turn red litmus paper to blue B. It is a metal
C. It can turn blue litmus paper to red D. It is a mixture
____66. Which of the following is NOT a compound?
A. Baking Soda B. Vinegar C. Salitre D. Steel
____67. The scientist who named atom from the word “atomos”.
A. Democritus B. Wilhelm Roentgen C. John Dalton D. J.J. Thomson
____68. The scientist who discovered X-ray in 1896.
A. Democritus B. Wilhelm Roentgen C. John Dalton D. J.J. Thomson
____69. The scientist who came up with the Atomic Theory of Matter.
A. Democritus B. Wilhelm Roentgen C. John Dalton D. J.J. Thomson
____70. The scientist who discovered electron in 1898.
A. Democritus B. Wilhelm Roentgen C. John Dalton D. J.J. Thomson
____71. It is the most abundant component in the atmosphere.
A. Nitrogen B. Oxygen C. Helium D. Hydrogen
____72. It acts with protein and copper to make hemoglobin.
A. Copper B. Iron C. Nickel D. Potassium
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

173
____73. It is an important ingredient in cloud seeding to produce rain.
A. Cesium B. Iron C. Silver D. Gold
____74. The element used to convert light signals to electric signals in devices.
A. Cesium B. Iron C. Silver D. Gold
____75. A noble gas which means “hidden”.
A. Xenon B. Krypton C. Helium D. Argon
IV. Living Things and their Environment
____76. All of the following enzymes are found in the small intestine EXCEPT:
A. ptyalin B. amino peptidase C. nuclease D. steapsin
____77. The following are factors that affect the action of enzymes EXCEPT:
A. hormone B. pH level C. pressure D. temperature
____78. An enzyme that will act on polypeptides changing them to amino acids.
A. erepsin B. pepsin C. amino peptidases D. trypsin
____79. These are chemical messengers that play vital roles in the digestive process.
A. enzymes B. digestive juices C. hormones D. neurons
____80. It stimulates the secretion of gastric juice by the gastric glands in the stomach.
A. CCK B. erepsin C. gastrin D. secretin
____81. Product of digestion is absorbed by the lacteal vessels and is brought to the lymphatic circulation.
A. glucose B. glycerol C. nucleic acid D. protein
____82. Which of the following organic nutrients is NOT absorbed by blood vessels in the intestinal villi?
A. amino acid B. glycerol C. fructose D. glucose
____83. In this mitotic stage, spindle disappears, chromosomes uncoil, and nuclear membrane reforms.
A. prophase B. metaphase C. anaphase D. telophase
____84. These are inorganic substances which the body needs in small quantities.
A. EFAs B. minerals C. antioxidants D. vitamins
____85. These are group of minerals that are needed in smaller amounts.
A. major minerals B. macrominerals C. essential minerals D. trace minerals
____86. These are naturally occurring compounds that have the ability to neutralize free radicals.
A. antioxidants B. betacarotene C. essential fatty acids D. minerals
____87. The common symptoms of this condition include bloody mucus in stool, anemia, and cramps.
A. indigestion B. constipation C. colitis D. flatulence
____88. The final preparation of the cell where it double checks the DNA of the replicated chromosomes.
A. gap phase 1 B. gap phase 2 C. interphase D. synthesis phase
____89. The process of cell division that occurs in all bacteria is referred to as:
A. binary fission B. binary fusion C. nuclear fission D. nuclear fusion
____90. The process of mitosis occurs in which order?
A. interphase >> metaphase >> anaphase >> prophase >> cytokinesis
B. anaphase >> telophase >> metaphase >> prophase >> cytokinesis
C. prophase >> metaphase >> anaphase >> telophase >> cytokinesis
D. prophase >> metaphase >> telophase >> anaphase >> cytokinesis
____91. It is the science that deals with describing, naming, and classifying living things.
A. biology B. botany C. taxonomy D. zoology
____92. He is considered as the father of modern taxonomy.
A. Linnaeus B. Dalton C. Darwin D. Woese
____93. Sleeping sickness is transmitted to humans through the bite of an infected _______.
A. fly B. mosquito C. tick D. all of these
____94. The level of classification which is composed of related families.
A. class B. order C. family D. kingdom
____95. The level of classification which is composed of related genera.
A. class B. order C. family D. kingdom
____96. The level of classification which is composed of related orders.
A. class B. order C. family D. kingdom
____97. Animals with body covered with spines are grouped under Phylum __________.
A. Mollusca B. Porifera C. Echinodermata D. Arthropoda
____98. Animals with body covered with exoskeleton and jointed feet are grouped under Phylum ________.
A. Mollusca B. Porifera C. Echinodermata D. Arthropoda
____99. Animals with soft body and sometimes covered with shells are grouped under Phylum _________.
A. Mollusca B. Porifera C. Echinodermata D. Arthropoda
____100. Animals with body covered with pores and canal systems are grouped under Phylum ________.
A. Mollusca B. Porifera C. Echinodermata D. Arthropoda
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

174

APPENDIX C

GUIDELINES IN EVALUATING STRATEGIC INTERVENTION MATERIALS

DIRECTIONS: Please evaluate the strategic intervention materials (SIM) on each of the
following criteria by encircling the appropriate indicator [5 - Very Evident (VE), 4 -
Evident (E), 3 - Moderately Evident (ME), 2 - Less Evident (LE), 1 - Not Evident (NE)].
Kindly also write your comments/remarks on the space provided below. Thank you.

VE E ME LE NE
CRITERIA
5 4 3 2 1
GUIDE CARD
1. Gives a preview of what a student will learn. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Stimulates interest in the topic 5 4 3 2 1
3. Presents the focus skills that:
a. mentions the learning competency. 5 4 3 2 1
b. states at least 3 sub tasks (activities). 5 4 3 2 1
c. builds on prior learning/prerequisite skills. 5 4 3 2 1
d. mentions the concrete outcome or product students are 5 4 3 2 1
expected to demonstrate/produce.
4. Cites briefly the activities. 5 4 3 2 1
5. Challenges the learner in performing the tasks. 5 4 3 2 1

ACTIVITY CARD
6. Translates the focus skills into at least 3 activities. 5 4 3 2 1
7. Provides activities that:
a. are organized based on the sequence of the focus skills 5 4 3 2 1
(in the Guide Card).
b. have clear directions. 5 4 3 2 1
c. provide examples to concretize the concepts, particularly 5 4 3 2 1
those drawn from real-life experience.
d. students can complete independently, in pairs or in groups. 5 4 3 2 1
e. allow students to make discoveries and formulate ideas on 5 4 3 2 1
their own.
f. guides and challenges students’ thinking and learning. 5 4 3 2 1
g. uses local data and situations. 5 4 3 2 1
8. Provides transition statements that recognize students’ 5 4 3 2 1
accomplishments.
9. Provides questions that:
a. guide the development of concepts/focus skill. 5 4 3 2 1
b. elicit the message or meaning that a student can take away 5 4 3 2 1
from an activity / experience.
c. elicit an explanation, not one word answers. 5 4 3 2 1
d. establish the relationship between the lessons and what 5 4 3 2 1
students already know
e. develop the skills in the three domains. 5 4 3 2 1
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

175

ASSESSMENT CARD
10. Provides exercises that allow students to:
a. assess their understanding of what they have learned 5 4 3 2 1
and correct errors when appropriate.
b. monitor their learning and use feedback about their 5 4 3 2 1
progress.
11. Formulated in standard test format to give students practice in 5 4 3 2 1
test-taking techniques.
12. Give clear directions. 5 4 3 2 1
13. Provides an answer key (in a separate card). 5 4 3 2 1

ENRICHMENT CARD
14. Provides activities that reinforce the content of the lesson. 5 4 3 2 1
15. Provides opportunity for students to:
a. apply what they have learned to other subject areas in a 5 4 3 2 1
new context.
b. work independently or in groups to explore answers to 5 4 3 2 1
their own questions.

ANSWER CARD
16. Provides complete answers in sequential order. 5 4 3 2 1
17. The answer card is easy to understand. 5 4 3 2 1
18. Appropriate for checking the activity card, assessment card, 5 4 3 2 1
And enrichment card.

REFERENCE CARD
19. Provides readings that relate content with students’ life
experiences. 5 4 3 2 1
20. Provides a carefully researched list of resources that:
a. will reinforce concepts / skills learned. 5 4 3 2 1
b. provide additional content not found in the textbook. 5 4 3 2 1
c. student may refer to further reading. 5 4 3 2 1

Comments/Remarks: ____________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name of Evaluator
UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

176

APPENDIX D

CERTIFICATION OF THE EVALUATORS

This is to certify that the STRATEGIC INTERVENTION MATERIALS IN


SCIENCE 8 of ATHINA MORA LACBAY, was evaluated by the undersigned at
Rinconada National Technical Vocational School, Sto. Domingo, Iriga City.

NAME OF EVALUATORS DESIGNATION

1. (Sgd) IRENE V. DE JESUS Head Teacher III

2. (Sgd) EMELITA B. ROMEROSA Master Teacher II

3. (Sgd) JOEL G. ARROYO Master Teacher I

4. (Sgd) IDA T. IBARRIENTOS Teacher III

5. (Sgd) JANE B. TAGUM Teacher II

6. (Sgd) JUDY C. SALCEDO Teacher II

7. (Sgd) CYRIL T. BERSABE Teacher I

8. (Sgd) MA. JOSEFINA S. CARUMBA Teacher I

9. (Sgd) MADONNA S. PERIABRAS Teacher I

10. (Sgd) ERMA V. ARROYO Teacher I


UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

177

CURRICULUM VITAE

ATHINA MORA LACBAY


October 28, 1993 | La Anunciacion, Iriga City
“Innovative. Young Mentor. Transformative Leader. Catalyst of Change.”

A Licensed Professional Teacher, a Civil Service


Eligible (P.D. 907), and a TESDA National Certificate
(NC) III holder in Events Management.
She is a graduate of Bachelor of Secondary
Education (BSEd), major in Biological Science at
University of Saint Anthony (USANT), Iriga City. She
also graduated with the degree Master of Arts in
Education, major in Science at the same University.
During her college years, she was a consistent
Dean’s Lister and a Resident Scholar. She was the
President of the Circle of Young Mentors S/Y 2013-2014 and received various
awards such as the Outstanding College Student of the Year 2014, CTE Excellence
in Science Award, Sen. Manny Villar and Cong. Salvio B. Fortuno Excellence Award
in Academics, a finalist of the Ten Outstanding Students of Bicol (TOSB) 2014, and
one of the Ten Outstanding Student Teachers (TOST) of Bicol 2014. She was also a
member of Alpha Phi Omega and was a Girl Scout of the Philippines Troop Leader.
Despite being from a poor family, it never became a hindrance for her to graduate as
Cum Laude.
She worked as a Grade 8 Science Teacher at USANT from 2014-2017 and
currently a Senior High School Teacher II at Rinconada National Technical
Vocational School (RNTVS), Sto. Domingo, Iriga City handling Grade 11 and 12
Science and other Core Subjects. She has attended various seminars, workshops,
trainings, and contests both on local and national level, and is continuing her post-
graduate studies for her professional growth.

You might also like