Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Course
Date
Question Four
In this section, I will define and critically analyze the commodification of urban space.
Parker (104) defines commodification of urban space as when the owners of a given "territory or
terrain” can “sell, rent, or derive” other advantages regarding their ownership title. As the author
notes, even though it might be argued that encountering “commodified public space is leisure,"
should not be concrete, moveable goods which might be stored in a warehouse because, in the
Marxian logic, a commodity entails “anything that the labor value has converted into a
Additionally, as the author argues, the city is never completely the commodified space
product; public roads, marketplaces, and squares occur “alongside modest townhouses, or grand
palaces and yet even ‘public space’ might be acquired, sold or hired and as such is valued as a
state asset in state accounts." For that reason, the urban scheme is essentially founded on
production relationships, which blend labor in the form of inhabitant and traveling wage-
workforces together with capital used to generate factory-made goods as well as services for a
moneymaking trade-off. As Parker (104) argues, the capitalist city comprises the conversion of
the space’s use-value into the land’s exchange value whereas offering the ways to generate and
trade-off the rest of commodities’ types. Besides, all elements – “labour, land or space, along
with immovable as well as liquid capital” – occur in their temporal field. Therefore, the office
SURNAME 2
commuters’ working days which have to be taken as mealtimes and journey times, are a portion
of a varying sequence to that of the structures; they work that might be designed for a 20 or 30
Work Cited
Parker, Simon. Urban theory and the urban experience: Encountering the city. Routledge, 2003.