In modern societies, the need for specialists in specific fields is undeniable.

To address this,
some propose that governments should allocate university funding based on societal
requirements, prioritizing relevant subjects. However, determining which disciplines are
"relevant" raises questions about the advantages and disadvantages of such an educational
policy.

One advantage of government funding for students pursuing needed disciplines is the
alignment of educational resources with the demands of society. By incentivizing students in
critical fields, governments can ensure an adequate supply of skilled professionals, fostering
economic growth and addressing societal challenges. This approach may lead to improved
workforce development and higher employability rates in key sectors such as healthcare,
technology, and engineering.

On the other hand, implementing a system that funds only specific disciplines risks undervaluing
the importance of a well-rounded education. Disciplines considered less relevant by current
standards might offer unique perspectives, creativity, and cross-disciplinary insights that
contribute to societal progress. Narrowing funding to a limited set of subjects may stifle
innovation, hinder interdisciplinary collaboration, and limit the overall intellectual diversity
necessary for well-rounded social development.

Additionally, defining "relevant" fields can be subjective and prone to bias. Societal needs evolve
over time, and determining which subjects hold long-term relevance can be challenging.
Restricting funding to specific disciplines may hinder the exploration of emerging fields or
impede the pursuit of knowledge for its intrinsic value, potentially limiting societal
advancements in unanticipated areas.

While directing government funding towards subjects needed by society may address
immediate skill shortages, it is crucial to balance this approach with the value of a diverse and
holistic education. Striking a balance between relevance and intellectual exploration can better
equip societies to adapt to evolving needs and foster well-rounded progress.