Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
School of Oriental and African Studies and Cambridge University Press are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies,
University of London
for attendants of the dreaded goddess. First of all we notice the same
two animals, the lion and the deer, which occupy the upper corners
of the panel in the Varmha-Mandapa at Mamallapuram. The latter
animal, which has forked horns, is preceded by a gana. Under each of
the two animals there is a male person kneeling. The one to the right
of Durga is shown in the same position as the corresponding figures
discussed above, but in the present case there can be no doubt that he
is represented in the action of cutting off his own head as an offering
to the goddess. In the same way the kneeling person on the left hand
side of the goddess appears to be cutting a piece of flesh from his thigh.
The Siva temple of Pullamangai bears several Tamil inscriptions
recording various donations to the temple and dated in the reign of
Parakesarivarman and other rulers of the Cola dynasty.1 The sculptural
decoration lacks the dignified simplicity and strength of Pallava art,
but excels by a richness and gracefulness which is free from the
exaggerations of later Dravidian architecture. It is evident that the
group of the goddess Durga and her attendants is a later form of what
we have seen on the earlier monuments of the Pallavas. We may,
therefore, safely conclude that in each of the examples which we have
been able to quote the person kneeling to the right-hand side of the
goddess is shown in the act of offering his own head as an offering.
In all probability the devotee of the goddess represented in this manner
was one of the founders of the temple in question and thus gave
expression to his supreme devotion to the deity and to his readiness
to bring her even the greatest sacrifice-that of his own head.
We do not wish here to discuss the question whether it would be
physically possible to decapitate oneself in the fashion portrayed
in the sculptures. It would be an act at any rate requiring not only a
high degree of self-determination but also an unusual dexterity. This
much is certain, that in ancient India this mode of self-sacrifice was
considered to lie within the range of possibility. This we may infer
from the occurrence of the same motif in Sanskrit literature. I may
be allowed to quote a few instances from Somadeva's Kathdsaritsigara.2
First of all we have the well known story of the hero Viravara,
which is found in two slightly different versions in that great collection
of stories. In the second version it is the fourth tale of the Vetala.
It forms, therefore, also part of other redactions of that highly popular
1 Annual Report on Epigraphy for the year 1921-22, Madras, 1923, pp. 48 f.
2 Kathls, liii, 86-193, and lxxviii, 83-102 (= Vetdla iv). Cf. Penzer, Ocean of
Story, vol. iv, pp. 173-81, and vi, p. 196.
collection
is Vetlapai~cavinm.ati.
also included in the Hitopade'a.1 Moreover, the same pathetic story
The story, according to the second version of the Kathksaritsdgara
(Vetila, iv), may be summarized as follows. In order to prolong the
life of his master, king i-ldraka, the hero Viravara, who here is called
a Brahman, offers the head of his son Sattvavara to the goddess
Candi. His daughter thereupon dies from grief, and his wife resolves
to throw herself on the funeral pyre on which the bodies of her two
children have been laid. Then Viravara resolves to gratify Ambika by
sacrificing himself. After a hymn of praise addressed to the goddess
Kali Mahisasuramarini, he cuts off his own head with a stroke of the
sword. King ~fidraka, touched by so great devotion, is about to follow
the example of his faithful servant, but a voice from heaven prevents
him from doing so. Finally all are brought back to life.
The other version of the Kathisaritsigara presents certain points of
difference. Here, too, the hero of the story is a Brahman called
Viravara. But the king, his master, is Vikramatufnga residing at
Vikramapura. When Viravara, after uttering a hymn of praise to the
goddess Candiika-devi is ready to sever his head from his body, a
heavenly voice (bhdrati ... asarird) commands him not to act rashly,
and offers him a boon. Thereupon Viravara begs from her the life of
king Vikramatutiga as well as the lives of his wife and children.
The version of the Hitopade'a agrees with that of the Vetala story
of the Kathisaritsigara. That the prose version calls Viravara a
Rajaputra seems natural and more original. The king is Sildraka.
The weeping woman who warns the hero of the fate threatening the
king is not the Earth-goddess, but the Laksmi of king kildraka.
After offering the head of his son to the goddess, who here is called
Bhagavati Sarvamailgala, the Rdjpfit Viravara cuts off his own head
and his wife does the same. Then the king, who has witnessed the
scene, seizes his sword to cut off his own head, but the goddess appears
in person and holds him back. All are revived.
The sixth Vetala tale of the KathasaritsSgara affords another very
curious example of the head-offering to the goddess.2 The hero of
the story is a washerman, named Dhavala, who, after having taken
wife, has entered a famous shrine of Gauri at gobhavati, and in his
fervent desire to please the deity, cuts off his head, which first he has
:j-:-::i:?:::::::i:::::::::i:jz:
. . . .. .. . ..
il:m, i
X~jj?i 'k
IMAGE OF DUR
PAGODAS ".
..........
............
...........
......... .....
...........
mi mom
15 1 R-Nm
...........
Z:.~-:::::
Z~::::"
a:;,-:::::::
AN T " .::::::~::'::::
F.:::::::::::
agi*~::~_::
"ax~::~~
Rol::j:?_~::::::_:::j:
x:i' _~-:i ::::
::..............
?.q,,:j:4:::::::
i:i:i:M:: j:::::
COOi:::::::j:
A/I ~ :~:,a:::: ::1:::::
Fdx.:j ::~:
NAME :::_:::j--
AMA::_-j:i:
. . . . . .....i-:
iw:::i-:
aiBI'i
NOs~ii
W ON ,:~:::j-:-
................... ............
.........
...............................
.........
....... ..-: j
0--to::
? 00,
St .41::
AL E i ~ ~ I
. . . . . . .
SCULPTURE IN RELIE
SHRINE OF THE IVA
spouse and her brother, she is seized by despair and wishes to hang
herself from an a'oka-tree. She is prevented from this self-chosen
death by a heavenly voice which offers her a boon. It goes without
saying that she asks the life of her husband and brother, but being
told to replace the two heads on the trunks of those two beloved
persons, in her confusion she interchanges the heads. The story ends
with the query: who of the two men is now to be her husband ?
The examples quoted will suffice to show that the sacrifice of one's
own head was a well-known motif. The deity to whom this supreme
sacrifice is made is always a goddess. This is a point of great interest,
because the same is the case with the sculptural representations
which we have been able to adduce above. That the offering of one's
own head is known to have been actually practised in India appears
from an interesting paper by Mr. Hira Lal, who speaks of certain
sects " who used to cut off their heads and tongues in a mandapa
especially erected for the purpose with a religious fervour worthy of
a better cause."'
1 Rai Bahadur Hira Lal, " The Golaki Matha," JBORS., vol. xiii (1927), p. 144.