Statistics

1. What extent of social media exposure does the AUP academy students use classified as:
a. media frequency and

Frequencies of Mostly Used Social Media

Mostly Used Social Media Counts % of Total Cumulative %

Tiktok 24 27.9 % 27.9 %

Instagram 26 30.2 % 58.1 %
Facebook 17 19.8 % 77.9 %
Youtube 15 17.4 % 95.3 %
Fb and youtube 1 1.2 % 96.5 %
Discord 2 2.3 % 98.8 %
Twitter 1 1.2 % 100.0 %

b. time spent?

Frequencies of Time spent for Social Media in a day

Time spent for Social Media in a day Counts % of Total Cumulative %

1 - 2 hours 25 29.1 % 29.1 %

3 - 4 hours 26 30.2 % 59.3 %
5 - 6 hours 24 27.9 % 87.2 %
7 - 8 hours 6 7.0 % 94.2 %
More than 9 hours 5 5.8 % 100.0 %

Frequencies of Time Used for Entertainment

Time Used for Entertainment Counts % of Total Cumulative %

Less than an hour 6 7.0 % 7.0 %

2 – 3 hours 34 39.5 % 46.5 %
4 – 5 hours 35 40.7 % 87.2 %
6 – 7 hours 6 7.0 % 94.2 %
8 hours an above 5 5.8 % 100.0 %

2. What is the level of the respondents in terms of:

a. cognitive,
 b. behavioral and,
c. emotional?

Descriptives
  Mean SD Verbal Interpretation

Cognitive 3.52 0.838 High

Emotional 3.34 0.876 Neutral
Behavioural 3.27 0.859 Neutral

Range Interpretation
1.00 – 1.50 Very low
1.51 – 2.50 Low
2.51 – 3.50 Neutral
3.51 – 4.50 High
4.51 – 5.00 Very High

3. Does social media exposure have any significant relationship on the adaptability of high school
academy students?

Correlation Matrix
Time Used for Time Spent for Social Media in a
Entertainment day
Cognitive Pearson's r 0.264 0.176
p-value 0.014 0.104
Spearman's
rho 0.252 0.189
p-value 0.019 0.081

Emotional Pearson's r 0.378 0.3

p-value < .001 0.005
Spearman's
rho 0.396 0.303
p-value < .001 0.005

Behavioural Pearson's r 0.308 0.288

p-value 0.004 0.007
Spearman's
rho 0.283 0.267
p-value 0.008 0.013

Adaptability Pearson's r 0.382 0.307

p-value < .001 0.004
 Spearman's
rho 0.373 0.316
p-value < .001 0.003

Interpretation:
Based on the results above, there is a significant relationship between the Time used for entertainment to the
Adaptability of the respondents (Pearson’s r = 0.382; p-value < 0.001; Spearman’s rho = 0.373; p-value <
0.001). Moreover, specifically the Cognitive (r = 0.264, p-value = 0.014; rho = 0.252, p-value 0.019), Emotional
(r = 0.378, p-value < 0.001; rho = 0.396, p-value < 0.001), and Behavioral (r = 0.308, p-value = 0.004; rho =
0.283, p-value = 0.008). In addition, the Time spent for a day has a significant relationship to emotional ( r =
0.3, p-value = 0.005; rho = 0.303, p-value = 0.005), Behavioral (r = 0.288, p-value = 0.007; rho = 0.267, p-value
= 0.013), and Adaptability (r = 0.307, p-value = 0.004; rho = 0.316, p-value = 0.003).

4. Which among the dimensions of social media exposure best predict adaptability?

Model Fit Measures

Overall Model Test
Model R R² F df1 df2 p

1 0.450 0.202 2.44 8 77 0.021

Model Coefficients - Adaptability

Predictor Estimate SE t p Stand. Estimate

Intercept ᵃ 2.8063 0.2828 9.925 < .001  

Time Used for Entertainment 0.2281 0.1030 2.214 0.030 0.2973
Time Spent for Social Media in a day 0.0602 0.0859 0.700 0.486 0.0960
Mostly Used Social Media:          
Instagram – Tiktok -0.2626 0.1997 -1.315 0.192 -0.3680
Facebook – Tiktok -0.0419 0.2143 -0.196 0.845 -0.0587
Youtube – Tiktok -0.3967 0.2226 -1.782 0.079 -0.5559
Fb and youtube – Tiktok -0.1779 0.7021 -0.253 0.801 -0.2493
Discord – Tiktok -0.3459 0.5018 -0.689 0.493 -0.4847
Twitter – Tiktok -0.4812 0.6914 -0.696 0.489 -0.6743

ᵃ Represents reference level

Interpretation:

Based on the results using linear regression, the overall model significantly predicts adaptability (R = 0.450,
R2 = 0.202, F =2.44, p-value= 0.021) since p-value = 0.021 which is lower than the chosen alpha = 0.05.
Moreover, among the predictors, Time used for entertainment was the greatest factor in predicting
adaptability (Est = 0.2281; SE = 0.1030; t = 2.214; p-value = 0.030). The time used for entertainment has as
well the greatest contributor to the model (S.Est = 0.2973).

5. Is there any significant difference in adaptability of the respondents when their sex, economic status,
and preferred social media platform are considered?

a. Sex

Independent Samples T-Test

    Statistic df p

Adaptability Student's t -0.375 84.0 0.708

Note. Hₐ μ 1 ≠ μ 0

Assumptions
Homogeneity of Variances Tests

    F df df2 p

Adaptability Levene's 0.463 1 84 0.498

Note. Additional results provided by moretests

Interpretation:

Assumptions were checked to determine if there is a violation of equal variances. Since Levene’s test for equal
variances is not significant (F = 0.463, p-value = 0.493) thus it was not violated. Therefore, Independent
parametric test will be used.

The results from independent t-test showed that there is no significant difference of adaptability levels across
sex ( t = -0.375, df = 84, p-value = 0.708).

B. Family income and Most social media used

ANOVA - Adaptability
  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p η²

Family Monthly income 8.33 6 1.389 3.18 0.008 0.193

ANOVA - Adaptability
  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p η²
Mostly Used Social Media 3.04 6 0.507 1.16 0.337 0.070
Residuals 31.91 73 0.437      

Assumption Checks
Homogeneity of Variances Tests

  Statistic df df2 p

Levene's 0.953 27 58 0.541

Note. Additional results provided by moretests
ᵃ F-statistic could not be calculated

Interpretation:

Assumptions were checked to determine if there is a violation of equal variances. Since Levene’s test for equal
variances is not significant (F = 0.953, p-value = 0.541) then it was not violated. Therefore, Independent
parametric test will be used.

The results from ANOVA showed that there is a significant difference of adaptability levels across family
income (F = 3.18, p-value = 0.008, Eta.Sq. = 0.193) since p-value is lower than the chosen alpha = 0.05 and it
has a large effect size (ES > 0.14) but no significant difference of adaptability levels across most social media
used (F = 1.16, p-value = 0.337, Eta.Sq. = 0.070) since p-value is greater than the chosen alpha = 0.05 and it has
a medium effect size (ES = 0.70, Medium: 0.06 ≤ ES < 0.014 ).

Post Hoc Comparisons - Family Income

Comparison
Mean
Family Income   Family Income SE df t ptukey
Difference

₱76,700 - ₱131, 484 - ₱9,520 - ₱21,194 0.5463 0.697 78.0 0.784 0.994
  - ₱21,195 - ₱43,828 1.1607 0.685 78.0 1.696 0.690
  - ₱219, 141 and up 0.7500 0.679 78.0 1.105 0.954
₱131,485 - ₱219,
  - 1.8333 0.714 78.0 2.566 0.184
140
Post Hoc Comparisons - Family Income
Comparison
Mean
Family Income   Family Income SE df t ptukey
Difference
  - ₱76,700 - ₱131, 484 0.9386 0.679 78.0 1.383 0.862
  - ₱43,829 - ₱76, 669 0.8782 0.686 78.0 1.280 0.904
  - Less than ₱10,957 1.3167 0.724 78.0 1.817 0.610
₱9,520 - ₱21,194 - ₱21,195 - ₱43,828 0.6144 0.283 78.0 2.174 0.378
  - ₱219, 141 and up 0.2037 0.268 78.0 0.761 0.995
₱131,485 - ₱219,
  - 1.2870 0.349 78.0 3.692 0.009
140
  - ₱76,700 - ₱131, 484 0.3923 0.268 78.0 1.466 0.823
  - ₱43,829 - ₱76, 669 0.3319 0.287 78.0 1.157 0.941
  - Less than ₱10,957 0.7704 0.369 78.0 2.088 0.431
₱21,195 - ₱43,828 - ₱219, 141 and up -0.4107 0.233 78.0 -1.763 0.646
₱131,485 - ₱219,
  - 0.6726 0.323 78.0 2.084 0.434
140
  - ₱76,700 - ₱131, 484 -0.2221 0.233 78.0 -0.954 0.979
  - ₱43,829 - ₱76, 669 -0.2825 0.255 78.0 -1.109 0.953
  - Less than ₱10,957 0.1560 0.345 78.0 0.453 1.000
₱131,485 - ₱219,
₱219, 141 and up - 1.0833 0.310 78.0 3.498 0.017
140
  - ₱76,700 - ₱131, 484 0.1886 0.215 78.0 0.879 0.987
  - ₱43,829 - ₱76, 669 0.1282 0.238 78.0 0.539 0.999
  - Less than ₱10,957 0.5667 0.332 78.0 1.705 0.684
₱131,485 - ₱219,
- ₱76,700 - ₱131, 484 -0.8947 0.310 78.0 -2.889 0.089
140
  - ₱43,829 - ₱76, 669 -0.9551 0.326 78.0 -2.926 0.081
  - Less than ₱10,957 -0.5167 0.400 78.0 -1.290 0.900
₱76,700 - ₱131, 484 - ₱43,829 - ₱76, 669 -0.0604 0.238 78.0 -0.254 1.000
  - Less than ₱10,957 0.3781 0.332 78.0 1.137 0.946
₱43,829 - ₱76, 669 - Less than ₱10,957 0.4385 0.348 78.0 1.260 0.911

Note. Comparisons are based on estimated marginal means

Cont. Intepretation:

Since Family income has a significant difference, Post-hoc test was used. Family income ₱9,520 - ₱21,194 and
₱131,485 - ₱219, 140 has a significant difference (MD = 1.29, df = 78.0, t = 3.692, p-value = 0.009). Moreover,
₱219, 141 and up & ₱131,485 - ₱219, 140 has a significant difference (MD = 1.0833, SE = 0.310, df = 78.0, t =
3.498, p-value = 0.017).