Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Challenges:
The APEC internally is split into two factions between China and USA, the widening
differences since 2018 APEC Summit resulted in a Trade war between the two.
TPP & USA Exit
USA criticised of China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative as a debt-trap diplomacy a
geopolitical strategy.
It also criticized China’s unfair trade practices, subsidies, market barriers, trade
manipulation and intellectual property theft.
The United States proposed a reform of the World Trade Organization to slash the
inappropriate benefits to largest economies like China, India and other countries.
China criticized USA’s America First policy its protectionism and unilateralism
especially the tariffs Trump has imposed on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods to
force China to change its policies.
“The entire world is worried,” said Prime Minister Peter O’Neill of Papua New Guinea.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada said, “I don’t think it will come as a huge surprise
that there are differing visions,”.
Creation of Sub-Regional Agreements: APEC in toto does not have any economic
framework or FTA on its own but there are few internal Sub-regional agreements like RCEP
(Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) and TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) which
scholars argue have further undercut the importance of APEC.
Free-Trade Areas: The FTA members do their trade and achieve their self –trade interest at
the expense of the non-FTA members.
Lack of implementation: Scholars argue that APEC members are more of proposes rather
than implementers. Member countries hardly put their proposals into action because of
economic indifferences. The Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific, or FTAAP, is a proposal
to create a free trade agreement existing since 2006 but never fructified.
Non-Binding nature: Critics argue that APEC’s non-binding nature has allowed
overlapping, and sometimes contradictory, economic and trade agreements to be negotiated.
Exclusion of India: India is the world’s fifth largest and Asia’s third-largest economy.
During 1989, foreign trade accounted for just 15 percent of India’s GDP, but that rose to 40
percent by 2017. India exclusion undermines APEC’s efforts to expand trade and innovation
throughout the region.