Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract - The most used technology for obtaining pure 11. INTRODUCTION
copper in oxide ore copper mining is LIX-SX-EW (Leaching -
Solvent Extraction - Electrowinning). In this process, the Some of the reasons accepted to anticipate that EW
maximum allowable current which does not lead to electrode processes will fh-ther increase its market share are;
short-circuit sets the production limit. This is a major drawback
if equipotential bars to connect the electrodes are used. This
0 Lower investment
common practice exhibits a high dispersion value for the Lower operational costs
current distribution. This paper presents a connection 0 Higher product quality
arrangement of the electrowinning cells to balance cathode 0 Minimum environment impact
currents. The new connection drives the current through more The most important operation cost of EW processes is
balanced resistivity channels. Moreover, the uniform level of electrical energy. Thus, current efficiency [l] is a key factor
current achieved produces a more standardized product. Both, and must be maintained as high as possible. This greatly
chemical and physical quality of cathodes is improved. Finally,
the approach limits anode-cathode overcurrent preventing
depends on the electric conductivity [2] and on the effect of
short circuit formation. Thus, current efficiency and plant iron concentration of the electrolyte [3]. Also, process losses
operation are also improved. should be as low as possible.
A major problem for EW plants is the inherent current
I. SUMMARY unbalance that decreases product quality and limit
productivity. In [4] a cell was modified to obtain quality
In electrowinning processes (EW) metallic copper is copper at 400 [A/m2]. This current density depends on mass
obtained fi-om diluted copper. Typically an electrowinning transfer rates in the cell and energy aspects [SI. The proposed
process uses a high current rectifier delivering 30000 [A] to approach forces current balance in EW plants allowing
100 cells connected in series. Each cell containing 61 anodes increasing productivity without reducing current efficiency
and 60 cathodes designed to operate with a current density of and without changing the rectifier system. The approach is
250 [A/m2]. based on the principle of current source converters [6].
Electrode current unbalances are responsible for a number
of process anomalies. Some of the more important 111. ACTUAL
ELECTRICAL
CONNECTION:
VOLTAGE
SOURCE
consequences are; lower production volume, higher product
rejection, lower copper price, lower energy efficiency and Electrowinning cells receive the current from a high current
lower electrode life. On top, process operation is also rectifier through a single bus-bar package connecting the
compromised because of the tendency to short circuit positive and negative ends of the load. The anodes of the first
formation. This proposal is focused in forcing a current cell are connected to the positive end. Now, the rectifier
balance instead of trying to reduce a number of factors, current flows to the electrolyte and to the cathodes of the cell.
which causes unbalance in the actual configuration. Next, a bar receives the current from the cathodes and
The proposed multicircuital connection allows a delivers it to following cell anodes. The current flows through
significant reduction of current unbalance. Therefore all the the cells following the path bar-anodes-electrolyte-cathodes-
above mentioned problems are mitigated. It has been bar. The last cell cathodes deliver the current to the negative
estimated that at least a gain of five percent in productivity end bar.
should be attainable. Moreover, process operation is greatly Figure 1 shows a scheme of actual EW cells electrodes
simplified. connection. In this figure anodes A of the first cell receive the
current from the rectifier through the circuit C. The bar B
distribute the incoming current to the anodes. The cathodes K
receive the current from the anodes through the electrolyte
and deliver it to the bar B that delivers it to the following cell.
This work was supported by FONDECYT, Chilean Research In this electric configuration the bar that hold the anodes
Council, Projects 198-0463 and 798-0005. connects them electrically. Also the bar that hold the cathodes
520
500
480
460
m
440
Fig. 3. Electrowinning cell model. Rc are contact resistances, Rak are anode- Cell position Cathode position
cathode resistances and V are anode-cathode potentials.
Fig. 4. Plant current distribution pattern with the actual voltage
source connection.
VI. CURRENT
DISTRIBUTION
using the voltage source connection with 10,000 [A] resulted 440
in a 500 [A] mean value with a 26.13 [A] standard deviation.
Cell posnioo Calhode p o s i l m
These results are shown in Figures 4 and 6.
Next, the proposed arrangement was tested. The rectifier
provides 10000 [A] for obtaining the 250 [A/m2] current Fig. 5. Plant current distribution pattern with the current source
density per plate face. The cathode current exhibits a normal connection.
distribution with 500 [A] mean value and a reduced 13.26
[A] standard deviation. These results are shown in Figures 5
and 6.
Comparing both connection arrangements with the aid of
Figure 6 (actual voltage source vls proposed current source)
becomes clear that the newer connection greatly reduces
current dispersion.
Figure 6 also suggests that the process current can be
boosted at least five percent without increasing the maximum
permissible current of the process (565 [A]).
$m
Copper (I) and Copper (11) Chloride in Solutions
Containing Other Chlorides such as Iron, Zinc, Sodium
- 450 and Hydrogen Chlorides”, Hydrometallurgy, vol. 12,
4M
353
pp.61-81, 1984.
[3] D. W. Dew and C. V. Phillips, “The Effect of Fe(I1) and
Fe(II1) on the Efficiency of Copper Electrowinning from
Dilute Acid Cu(I1) Sulphate Solutions with the Chemels
Cell p o s d m Cathode position
Cell”, Hydrometallurgy, vol. 14, pp.33 1-349, 1986.
Fig. 8. Short circuit mitigation in EW plants with current source
[4] P. Gopala Krishna and S . C. Das, “Enhancement of
connection. Operating Current Density in a Copper Electrowinning
Cell”, Hydrometallurgy, vol. 3 1, pp.243-255, 1992.
[5] T. Subbaiah, S . C. Das and R. P. Das, “Mass Transfer
The same phenomenon was simulated in an EW plant Rates in an Electrochemical Cell”, Hydrometallurgy, vol.
model with the current source connection. The proposed 33, pp.153-163, 1993.
connection succeeds in preventing the short circuit current. [6] E. P. Wiechmann, P. D. Ziogas and V. R. Stefanovic, “A
Figure 8 shows the limiting effect (only 13.58% overcurrent) Novel Bilateral Power Conversion Scheme for Variable
of this connection. This value of current lies within range of Frequency Static Power Supplies”, IEEE Transactions on
acceptable standard deviation for most of the cases, Industry Applications, vol. IA-21, N05,pp.1226-1233,
therefore, the majority of short circuits are now prevented. Sept/Oct. 1985.