Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
Under certain conditions it is shown that an extended culture is equivalent
to an exponentially-fed-batch culture, that an exponentially-fed-batch culture
(and an extended culture) can be maintained a t a steady state and that an
exponentially-fed-batch culture may be mimicked by a continuous-flow culture
with a constant dilution rate. Operational conditions required to maintain
steady states are specified.
INTRODUCTION
Semicontinuous operation of batch cultures in which a medium
containing the growth-limiting substrate is fed continuously has
been developed empirically for such industrial applications as
penicillin‘-3 and bakers’ yeast productions3 and waste disposals.
This type of culture operation was termed by Yoshida et al.4 as
“Fed-Batch Culture,” who tried fed-batch fermentation of hydro-
carbon and reported that the cell/substrate yield during the linear
growth phase was about twice as high as that during the exponential
growth phase. Edwards e t aL5 gave a brief treatment of what
they termed “extended culture,” a fed-batch culture in which the
limiting substrate concentration is kept constant by manipulating
the feed rate of the substrate. They also gave various examples
of industrial practices of extended culture. Apparently, the fed-
batch culture may be operated at a constant feed rate, a programmed
feed rate, or a n exponentially increasing feed rate.4-6 I n fact, a
device had been proposed which delivers exponentially increasing
amounts of nutrients and allows precise control of bacterial growth
rate.6 Pirt’~8 presented arguments to show that when the specific
growth rate of organisms follows that of a Monod type, a fed-batch
culture may reach a “quasi-steady state,” which is defined as dx/dt
425
01977 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
426 LIM, CHEN, AND CREAGAN
ANALYSIS
We begin by writing pertinent material balance equations for
fed-batch cultures. Henceforth we shall assume that the cultures
are run under constant environmental conditions including pH,
temperature, and other nutrients except the limiting substrate.
We shall also assume that the culture is pure and there is only one
limiting substrate. For convenience we will not consider any product
formation and consider the biomass (cell) as the product as in the
case of single-cell protein production.
Fed-Batch Culture
Consider a batch culture into which a nutrient medium containing
a fixed concentration of a limiting substrate SF is fed continuously
at a flow rate of Ffb. Initially the culture volume is Vo and the
culture contains fixed concentrations of cells and substrate, zo and
so. The maximum culture volume is VmaX. The appropriate
balance equations during the filling time period, 0 5 t _< t,
(/fa= ~ I b ( r )dT _< - v,),are
vmaX
EXTENDED AND EXPONENTIALLY-FED-BATCH CULTURES 427
and
(-+) (sp - s) - ux =
ds
-
dt
s(0) = so (4)
and
- bx dx
- px x(0) (8)
( ( V o b - a)e-bt/a +1 = -
dt
= 50
V = Vo + 1:
F e x ( r )dr = Voec(80)1
F, =
bVc
(Vob - a)edbt/a +1 (vmaX
- + 1) (20)
DISCUSSION
Various types of fed-batch cultures were analyzed and certain
equivalences were established under the assumption that u and p
are functions of the limiting substrate concentration only. Under
specified conditions it was shown that an extended culture may be
equivalent to an exponentially-fed-batch culture. Operational
conditions were also specified which should force a n exponentially-
fed-batch culture (and therefore also an extended culture) to behave
as a steady-state fed-batch culture in which the biomass and sub-
strate concentrations remain constant for all times. I n practice,
however, establishment of these conditions requires exact knowledge
of u and p a priori.
Under the same assumption on u and p the substrate and cell
concentration dynamics of fed-batch cultures may be mimicked
by constant-volume continuous-flow cultures in which the transients
are caused by the initial subst,rate and cell concentrations and/or
the feed flow rate which may decrease, increase, or remain constant.
EXTENDED AND EXPONENTIALLY-FED-BATCH CULTURES 433
References
1. A. J. Moyer, U.S. Patent 2,442,141 (May 25, 1948).
2. P. Hosler and M. J. Johnson, Ind. Eng. Chem., 45, 871 (1953).
3. S. C. Prescott and C. D. Dunn, Industrial Microbiology, 3rd Ed., McGraw-
Hill, Inc., New York, 1959.
4. Y. Yoshida, T. Yamane, and K. Nakamoto, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 15, 257
(1973).
5. V. H. Edwards, M. J. Gottachalk, A. Y. Noojin, 111, L. B. Tuthidl, and
A. L.Tannahill, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 12,975 (1970).
6. R. G. Martin and G. Felsenfeld, Anal. Biochem., 8, 43 (1964).
7. S. John Pirt, J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 24. 415 (1974).
8. S.John Pirt, Principles of Microbe and Cell Cultivation, John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1975.
9. D. Y. Ryu and A. E. Humphrey, J . Femnent. Technol. Osaka, 50,424 (1972).
10. C. T. Calam and D. W. Russell, J . Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 23,225 (1973).
11. A. L. Demain, J . Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 22, 345 (1972).
12. I. J. Dunn and J. R. Mor, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 17, 1805 (1975).