Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Parks
and
Public
Realm
Plan:
Public Space
Public Life
Study
Downtown Parks and Public Realm Plan:
Public Space Public Life Study
Acknowledgements
City Planning
Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Transportation Services
Prepared by:
Gehl Studio
PUBLIC WORK
In collaboration with:
SWERHUN ASSOCIATES
SAM SCHWARTZ CONSULTING LLC
ii
iii
Contents
2. Survey Zones
Pulse on the ground
3. Summary Sheets
Data summary
74 Summary Sheets
iv
Graffiti Alley, ‘Love Your Laneway’ event, by the Laneway Project, Toronto, Canada
v
2
1. Public Space Public Life Study
Measuring how Torontonians use public space
3
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
The Public Space Public Life (PSPL) Study was In the summer and winter of 2016, the consultant team
undertaken as part of ‘TOcore: Planning Downtown’, with Park People, City staff and volunteers conducted a
an initiative to prepare a 25-year plan for the heart of Public Space Public Life (PSPL) Study to observe and
Toronto. The PSPL Study informed the preparation measure life in Downtown Toronto. In the PSPL Study,
of the Downtown Parks and Public Realm Plan, which we observed and measured how people use the city. By
will guide the development of an expanded, improved, listening and learning from Torontonians we were able to
connected and accessible network of high-quality answer hard-to-measure questions.
parks and public spaces for people and promote
healthier, diverse natural systems to support a growing The PSPL Study was made up of several components:
Downtown. The purpose of the Parks and Public
Realm Plan is to set a vision for parks, open spaces • Favourite Places: pop up events, stakeholder
and streets, and to provide a framework to re-imagine, workshop, and on-line mapping;
transform and grow public space. The four objectives of • Public Life Study;
the Plan are: acquire and expand; improve; share; and • Intercept Survey; and
connect. The PSPL Study explores these objectives by • Public lecture series.
assessing where public life is thriving, and where we can
make improvements. In 2015, Parks, Forestry & Recreation undertook a
Park Asset and Use Survey for all public parks in the
Downtown Toronto has an abundance of opportunities Downtown. The survey took stock of existing assets
to expand and improve the city’s parks and open space (such as park furniture, playground structures, and other
system. For Toronto to support the unprecedented park elements), location and condition. In addition, some
growth, public spaces must be well located, organized observational data was gathered, which focused on how
and designed with quality in mind. To design quality the parks are being used and the demographics of users.
parks and public spaces it is critical to start with the
most important resource in the city, the people, to
understand how the Downtown’s public realm supports
people today, and how the design of public spaces could
better support public life.
4
Favourite Places Pop-Up and Workshop, April 2016
5
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
The Public Space Public Life (PSPL) Study, an Undertaking a public life study is straightforward.
architectural ethnographic study that Gehl has been Through observation, the surveyor counts people,
developing over 50 years, thoroughly documents identifies gender and age (based on assumptions), and
empirical evidence of urban quality of life. The survey gathers information on how long people are staying in
provides an understanding of public life today, and acts a public space and what they are doing. A PSPL study
as a compass pointing toward where we ought to be asks the following general questions:
heading tomorrow. The PSPL Study is a methodological
tool used to study the public life, as well as the public How Many? Gathering quantitative data provides a
spaces of a city. It is a guide for asking the right measurement that can be used to inform and support
questions, orienting development priorities, setting decisions. The number is of most interest when a
targets and measuring successes moving forward in a comparison can be made. For example, counting
project. PSPL studies show the large impact that public the number of people that are using a space before
realm improvements have on quality of life in a city, and improvements and then again after changes are made
such evidence has proven vital to maintaining public is an effective way of measuring the success of a public
interest in future improvement projects. realm initiative.
A PSPL Study examines human behaviour in the built Who? Gathering information on gender and age helps
environment. It studies how people interact with their build a user-group profile. It tells us who is using a
surroundings, and how the built environment supports space, but also who is choosing not to use it. This
social interaction. In the same way that transportation information can be used to inform interventions that
engineers study traffic movements, a public life study further support the needs of the present groups, as well
looks at how people move in public spaces and what they as interventions to draw and accommodate user groups
are doing. The results of a public life study can be used that are not currently present.
to inform a range of decisions from conceptual planning
to detailed design. Where? Understanding where people move and stay can
help develop a design response that is supported by
observations. Through observing movement patterns,
barriers can be uncovered and the most desirable path
locations can be established. If the study area is within
a delineated space, studying where people stay can help
determine where elements such as seating, fountains,
and entryways should be located.
6
What is Public Life?
What? Mapping what happens in public space provides Public space weaves the components of public life –
knowledge of the types of activities in the area and people, place, and culture – together. A robust public
builds an understanding of what draws people there. life is the essence of a great city. It is what a collective
Through observing the social activities that are group of people create when they flourish outside of
occurring in the public space, we are then able to their home and workplace.
support the social function of the space through various
design interventions. The primary activities to observe Public life is Authentic. It reflects the culture and social
are walking, staying, sitting and playing, but these can norms unique to a place, derived from the political,
be supplemented by site-specific activities depending economic, and intellectual history.
on the context of the site. In addition, observing the
types of interactions between people is also of interest, Public life is Dynamic. It has an infectious energy.
such as passive contact (people-watching), interactions People like to be in the company of other people and
between people who know each other and interactions public space allows them to do so.
among strangers.
Public life is Contextual. It responds to and varies
How long? Pedestrian speed and/or the amount of time according to surroundings. Public space can provide
people spend in a place provides information on the clues to what participation is appropriate and
quality of a space. Generally, people walk slower or encouraged in a specific place.
stop and spend time in a place that is appealing and
comfortable. In addition, the amount of time they spend Public life is Inclusive. It encompasses the preferences
in a place is often influenced by quality. and choices of the many and the few. All are invited to
participate in the activity of the city.
7
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
1 Places to Sit 2 Lush & Green 3 Food & Drink 4 Safe 5 Dynamic
8
TOP 10 FAVOURITE PLACES TOP 10 PLACES WITH GREAT POTENTIAL
Favourite Places Pop-Up and Workshop, April 2016 Despite the cool weather, participants stop to share their
favourite places and cherished urban qualities, April 2016
9
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
With a picture of Toronto’s favourite places, valued We look at how people stay in space.
qualities and opinions of emerging hotspots, we
conducted a PSPL Study on a weekend and weekday, in
the summer and winter, of key areas in the Downtown.
In addition, we undertook an intercept survey in select
locations to learn more about park users. The survey
Standing Lying Down Bench Seating
established a baseline of who is there, how people move
through the Downtown, and how they spend time in
parks and the public realm.
Physical Activity
We look at how and where people move through space.
10
PSPL SURVEY ZONES
A Kensington Market
B Alexandra Park
C Clarence Square
D St. Patrick’s Square
E David Pecaut Square
F Jack Layton Ferry Terminal
G King and Bay Intersection
H Village of Yorkville Park
I University Avenue
J David Crombie Park
K Moss Park
L Anniversary Park
M Riverdale Park West
N St. James Town
O Huron Playground
P St. James Park
2 O
2
1
H
1 1
N M
2
2
r 10 1
2
L
s and 3 1 I
cated
A 2
1 2
1
K
2
1
B 2
2 P
y 2
e D 1 1
1
2
G 2
J 1
1
2
3 2
1 E
C
1
F
PSPL Study Map, showing the 16 survey zones; blue dots represent locations where volunteers counted pedestrians and
cyclists, noting age and gender; red outlines represent locations where volunteers mapped stationary activity and other
qualitative findings, Toronto, Canada
11
Staying
Key Findings
12
13
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
01
Toronto’s spaces that prioritize
quality and provide a rich mix of
activities excel.
The diagrams illustrate how many people stay and linger A place is sticky when it pulls people
in a given place compared to the number of people that in, attracting them to spend time for
walk by. We call this ratio stickiness. The Downtown plazas longer periods, whether active or passive.
and parks with high visitor frequencies– those that are Understanding the level of stickiness
is crucial to providing insight into how
the stickiest – are the places that meet Toronto’s spatial
people use, stay, and enjoy a public space.
quality criteria with flying colours.
STICKINESS
High Performers:
WALKING 483
STAYING 57
Ontario Lane,
St. James Town 10%
WALKING 443
STAYING 46
Alexandra Park
27%
WALKING 304
STAYING 81
14
02
Some spaces see few people
staying compared to the volume
of people walking by.
Some spaces in the Downtown see extremely high
volumes of pedestrian traffic nearby and could be working
harder to invite people to stay (and stay longer), especially
outside business hours. Today, the predominant activity
mix is sitting or standing. A wider variety of functions will
invite more people to use Downtown public spaces as
‘staying’ destinations.
STICKINESS
Low Performers:
WALKING 1727
STAYING 60
WALKING 2048
STAYING 44
15
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
IN FOCUS
Yorkville Park
Yorkville Park sees 86 people/hour on average staying. It is Yorkville Park demonstrates excellent
one of the most consistently used places surveyed in the inward and outward urban design
core. Yorkville is an example of a place that combines all of conditions: dynamic and engaging
the qualities Torontonians desire in their public realm. facades with many entry points along its
edges.
Cozy
Outdoor Food
& Drink
All Season Play Outdoor Relax
Many Choices
to Sit and Stay
Spontaneous Fine Grain
Yorkville Park, Toronto, Canada
16
IN FOCUS
David Pecaut Square
Public life in David Pecaut Square is heavily reliant on David Pecaut Square has hardscapes,
programming. Events such as Toronto Fashion Week, Toronto inactive surrounding facades and
Film Festival, the Farmer’s Market, and musical entertainment uninviting, exposed edge conditions,
draw crowds of people on a regular basis. However, the PSPL making it an uninviting place to spend
Study found that when not programmed, only 21 people an time when it is not programmed with
hour spend time in David Pecaut Square. As a central Toronto events.
location, there should be more invitations to stay during non-
programmed times. From the Quality Criteria, only 2 out of Toronto Quality Criteria Present in
10 qualities are present in the square on non-event days: David Pecaut Square:
places to sit; and safety. 21 people
per hour
Very Exposed
17
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
03
Neighbourhood parks and public
spaces are sociable and diverse.
ALEXANDRA PARK
Parks and public spaces that are within neighbourhood Alexandra Park is an open and
settings are where communities come together and thrive. spacious park near several important
Downtown, these spaces have rich neighbourhood ties, destinations: Queen West, Chinatown
and the survey found a significant diversity of people of and Kensington Market. The park
different ages and incomes using these public spaces. St. draws on its diverse surrounding
James Town and Alexandra Park are examples of inclusive neighbourhoods to create a popular
public spaces where people stay for significant amounts of community space.
time and visit regularly.
A Social Space
A Neighbourhood Asset
An Age-Friendly Space
64+
15-19
41-64
A vibrant mix
of ages.
20-30
31-40
18
INTERCEPT SURVEYS
A Social Space
Street market at Ontario Lane, St. James Town, Toronto, Canada A Place to Spend Time
A Neighbourhood Asset
An Age-Friendly Space
15-19
64+
20-30
A vibrant mix
of ages.
41-64 31-40
04
Some parkettes are punching
above their weight.
RIN
K
EEN
& D MIC GR
FOO
D
LA X
L
DYN
A
H &
O RE
YFU LUS SY
CES T
PLA &W
HIM
PLA
Y Z AFE S LOR
CO CO
O RELA
X
CEST
PLA
Bloor-Bedford Parkette, Toronto Margaret Fairley Parkette, Toronto Sculpture Garden, Toronto
20
Others represent untapped
potential and an opportunity to
invite public life.
There are a number of parkettes that should, and easily
could, fulfill more of the Quality Criteria. These small
parks should bolster Downtown Toronto’s fine grain
experience, working together to create pockets of lush
and green, local activity centers and places of respite.
Parkettes should be a focal point for inviting more people
– using the identified Quality Criteria – to get more out of
Toronto’s existing parks and public realm. In addition, they
should be designed and programmed to respond to local
needs.
Seaton Parkette, Toronto Richmond & Jarvis, Toronto St. Mary’s Parkette, Toronto
21
Moving
Key Findings
22
23
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
05
Streets should invite people in
their free time, not just when
they need to be there. DAILY AVERAGE
2000
1000
9AM
11AM
8AM
10AM
12PM
2PM
3PM
4PM
5PM
6PM
7PM
1PM
Weekend:
4000
1000
0
9AM
11AM
8AM
10AM
12PM
2PM
3PM
4PM
5PM
6PM
7PM
1PM
24
06
A winter city: Torontonians
don’t hibernate.
DAILY AVERAGE
658
11 percent change – averaging 659/hour in the summer
People per hour.
to 582/hour in the winter. Weekend activity even sees a
slight uptick during the winter months, suggesting a latent
demand for spaces that embrace and leverage the city’s Winter Average:
all-season public life.
582 People per hour.
815
800
Ave. People/Hour/Day
632
600 532
504
400
Weekend
Weekend
Weekday
Weekday
200
0
Summer Winter
Places to Sit
Lush & Green
Outdoor Food & Drink
Safe
Dynamic / Changeable
Colorful & Whimsical
All Season Public Life
Cozy / Places to Relax
Spontaneous & Playful
Closeness & Fine Grain
Local Identity
25
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
06
Four streets shine, attracting
more people on weekday
afternoons and on weekends. DAILY AVERAGE
4000
3000
2000
1000
0 9AM
11AM
8AM
10AM
12PM
2PM
3PM
4PM
5PM
6PM
7PM
1PM
Weekend:
29% jump on
weekends
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
9AM
11AM
8AM
10AM
12PM
2PM
3PM
4PM
5PM
6PM
7PM
1PM
26
IN FOCUS
Facade Quality
QUALITY
Open facades:
Inside and outside
bleed together
27
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
07
Downtown is drawing
millennials, but fewer children
and elderly. AVERAGE AGE BREAKDOWN - STREETS
32%
9%
5%
Weekend:
49%
40%
11%
8%
28
AGE-FRIENDLY STREETS
08 The Esplanade
Wellesley St E
29%
26%
Some areas see a vibrant mix of Riverdale Park Rd 21%
Baldwin St 20%
age groups.
AVERAGE AGE BREAKDOWN - PARKS
19%
15%
11%
Weekend:
46%
22%
16% 16%
29
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
09
A cycling city. The most robust
bike lanes see world-leading
cycling volumes. DAILY AVERAGE
400
200
9AM
11AM
8AM
10AM
12PM
2PM
3PM
4PM
5PM
6PM
7PM
Exceptional Streets – Sherbourne Street, 1PM
Adelaide Street and Queens Quay:
600
400
200
0
9AM
11AM
8AM
10AM
12PM
2PM
3PM
4PM
5PM
6PM
7PM
1PM
30
BIKE VOLUME — COMPARISON
Sherbourne Street
Toronto, Canada
600
IN FOCUS 400
200
Sherbourne Street
0
8AM - 7PM
Vester Voldgade
Copenhagen, Denmark
When compared to some of the busiest cycling streets 800
we’ve surveyed, Sherbourne Street and Queens Quay are
600
966 Peak
among the top used. In terms of daily volume, they are in
the top 20; but it is the hourly peak that is most impressive
400
(they are both in the top 10): 972 cyclists per hour at 9 am
on Sherbourne Street and 708 cyclists per hour at 5pm on 200
Queens Quay.
0
8AM - 7PM
Burrard Bridge
Vancouver, Canada
800
744 Peak
600
400
200
0
8AM - 3PM
Zhonghua Rd
Shanghai, China
400
200
0
7AM - 7PM
With a peak of over 950 cyclists per hour, Sherbourne Street is one A comparison of global leading bikeways
of the busiest bike lanes in North America, Toronto, Canada with some of the highest peak hour volumes
31
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
10
Despite growing volumes of
cyclists, cycling in the Downtown
is still not inviting everyone. GENDER SPLIT
50%
MEN
Biking:
33%
WOMEN
67%
MEN
32
11
Waiting for the ferry could be
more comfortable and enjoyable.
+3,000
People wait here daily on
weekends.
~600
People per hour stand and wait
on weekends between the hours
of 11am and 3pm.
70%
Of surveyed activity is
standing and waiting.
33
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
12
Space does not always
match use.
SPACE VERSUS USE
P P
USE SPACE
PEDS 50% 24%
TRANSIT 33% 32%
CARS 16% 64%
CYCLISTS 1% 0%
The Parcade installation located on King Street near St. James
Park, part of the King Street Pilot, Toronto, Canada
34
IN FOCUS
Swanston Street, Melbourne,
Australia
WIN-WIN: TRANSIT + PUBLIC LIFE
Art &
Installations
Excellent Micro-
Climate – Tree Canopy
Active
Frontages
Visible Transit Stops,
Outdoor Food Without Being Overbuilt
& Drink Many Choices
to Sit and Stay
Inviting Informal
Places to Stay
A Clear Path /
Room to Walk
Swanston Street, Melbourne, Australia Since the street’s re-design, Melbourne has
seen a 24 percent increase in pedestrian
activity and a 5 percent increase in retail space.
35
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
Findings Summary:
Staying
What are the characteristics of places in the Toronto’s spaces that prioritize quality and provide a
rich mix of activities excel at supporting public life.
Downtown that truly invite for use, activity
These parks and public spaces tend to be sticky. For
and interaction? example, one in eight people that walk by Yorkville
Park stick around.
To invite people to spend time in the
Some signature Downtown spaces see few people
Downtown, the quality of space is important. staying compared to the volume of people walking
Squares and parks – even small ones – that by. For example, at David Pecaut Square just one in
50 people that walk by stop and spend time. A good
offer protection, comfort and delight serve the
target for a public space is to capture one in five
public best and invite a thriving public life. people walking by.
36
Findings Summary:
Moving
How well do streets in the Downtown invite There are 40 percent fewer people on streets in the
Downtown on weekends. Streets that shine have an
people to walk, bike and move around,
engaging and continuous urban fabric and link people to
especially outside of commuting peaks and activities and destinations. These streets draw up to 30
lunch hours? percent more people during weekday afternoons and on
weekends. Great streets are those that invite people in
their free time, not just when they need to be there.
There is more to walking than getting from
A to B. The quality of ground floor frontages Downtown is drawing young people and millennials, but
some areas can do better at attracting families to stay and
and street furnishings along some streets
spend time. Attracting families with young children and
help to invite people (especially kids and elderly can be more challenging in urban centres. While
families) to walk in the Downtown in their many areas in the Downtown are a major draw for all
ages, such as Kensington Market, the waterfront and key
free time (weekday afternoons, evenings and
parks such as Riverdale Park, other streets and spaces
weekends). can do better at attracting families with young children
and the elderly to stay and spend time.
37
38
2. Survey Zones
Pulse on the ground
39
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE A • Few spikes and valleys: Steady pedestrian volumes
KENSINGTON MARKET •
throughout the day, building through the afternoon.
Relatively low sitting activity compared to walking
----------------------------------- numbers. Most people come to Kensington to stroll
Locations through slowly and take it all in, many of whom walk
A1 Baldwin Street directly on the roadway.
A2 Kensington Ave • More weekend than weekday activity.
A3 Baldwin St and Kensington Ave
au St
Key Objectives
Nass
Spad
win S
t A1
Bald 1. Prioritize pedestrians in the design of streets.
ina S
St
drew spaces.
Augu
St An
Kens
ingto
ve
n Av
e
More Seating
Provide places for people to sit and stay in public
spaces, including in parks and along streetscapes.
Pilot to Permanent
40
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
Weekday Weekend 42
26%
Sitting 48 48 62 37 51
Standing
3 60%
Being Active
Baldwin St (Age Chart) Baldwin (at Spadina) Kensington Ave (at Baldwin)
Weekend
43% 46% 6% 2514
1320 1362
0-6
7-14
15-30
31-64
65+
114 120
60 90
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
41
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE B • Dundas Street is a major cycle route throughout
ALEXANDRA PARK the week, with significant traffic during the morning
commute.
----------------------------------- • Alexandra Park sees high staying volumes with
Locations a diverse range of visitors across age groups
B1 Dundas Street throughout the day, building through the afternoon.
B2 Bathurst Street
B3 Alexandra Park
t
Key Objectives
as S
Dund
Denis
B1
on A
Park
Dundas Street.
rust
St
Carr circuit.
Pilot to Permanent
42
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
Weekday Weekend
67
112 95
Sitting 72
42 29 50
Standing
Being Active 65%
Dundas St (Age Chart) Dundas (at Casmir) Bathurst (at Alexandra Park)
Weekend
28% 57% 9%
402
156
102
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
43
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE C • Cycling spike during morning weekday commute on
CLARENCE SQUARE Spadina Avenue.
• Sharp spike in pedestrian movement at lunch hour.
----------------------------------- • Very few people spend time in the park compared to
Locations the volume of people on neighbouring streets. Many
C1 Spadina Avenue visitors to the park are dog owners (surveyed inside
C2 King St West the dog-off-leash-area).
C3 Clarence Square
Key Objectives
St W
King
C2
C1 Sq
ence
Clar
green oasis in the heart of the Downtown.
ina A
C3
St
We lling
ton comfortable invitations to stay.
tW
3. Improve pedestrian connections, especially across
tS
Fron
Spadina Avenue.
Improve Connections
Governor’s Island, New York City, United States Improve pedestrian connections with fun and bright
crossings. Use paving and wayfinding to create
a cohesive green link across Spadina Ave along
Wellington Street to Victoria Memorial Park.
Pilot to Permanent
44
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
21 24 44 29
10 12
52%
Hourly Average 3%
Staying 30 | Walking 489
Staying
39%
6%
Weekday Weekend
30
Sitting 52 57
30 11 13 14 58%
Standing
Being Active
Weekend
2900
42% 45% 10%
2300
0-6
7-14
15-30
31-64
65+
420
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
45
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE D • Queen Street sees similar weekday and weekend
ST. PATRICK’S SQUARE pedestrian volumes, indicating a street that people
choose to visit.
----------------------------------- • During the weekdays, St. Patrick’s Square is only
Locations capturing 2 percent of the people walking by, and
D1 St. Patrick’s Market those few who do stay are not active.
D2 Queen St West
D3 St. Patrick’s Square
St
Key Objectives
hanie
Step
Mc C
St Pa
St Pa
D1
trick
Sq
John
Midblock Discovery
Invite vendors (food/coffee pop-ups) and engage
local artists and designers to create installations that
activate and open up the square (via the laneways).
Pilot to Permanent
46
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
2%
44
82
26 45 47 53
9
83%
Weekday Weekend
64
106 95
Sitting 79 66
8 27
Standing
Being Active 66%
St. Patrick’s Market (Age Chart) St. Patrick’s Market Queen St W (at St. Patrick’s Market)
54% 4 0% 6%
0-6
7-14
15-30
31-64
65+
228 252
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
47
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE E • Largest lunchtime spike in the Downtown, seeing
DAVID PECAUT SQUARE 3984 people per hour.
• David Pecaut Square sees a lunchtime spike, but is
----------------------------------- otherwise very quiet when not programmed.
Locations • Over 2,000 people walk by per hour, yet fewer than 60
E1 King St W people stay.
E2 King St W
E3 David Pecaut Square
l St Key Objectives
Pear
St W
King
E2 1. Make David Pecaut Square a destination outside of
Simc
E1
e St
Pecaut Sq
2. Make David Pecaut Square a place to stay and relax
E3
John
St
Well
ington 3. Support local commerce and creativity with kiosks.
Pilot to Permanent
48
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
4%
Hourly Average Staying 56 | Walking 2246
Staying 31%
2%
56
169
56 35 32
28 15
65%
Weekday Weekend
21
Sitting 49
1 19 25 18 16
Standing 72%
Being Active
King St W (at DPS) (Age Chart) King St W (at John St) King St W (at Ed Mirvish Way)
Weekend 3126
42% 42% 13%
2052 2358
0-6
7-14
15-30
31-64
65+
144 132
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
49
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE F • Bay Street and Queens Quay are major cycling
JACK LAYTON FERRY TERMINAL •
routes throughout the week.
Busiest stationary activity in the Downtown, seeing
----------------------------------- over 366 people staying per hour during weekend
Locations ferry hours; 75 percent are people standing, waiting
F1 Bay Street to purchase their ferry ticket or board the ferry.
F2 Queens Quay W • During off-peak hours, the terminal area is quiet.
F3 Ferry Terminal
ur
St Key Objectives
rbo
Ba
Ha
yS
t
F1
1. Support a multi-modal transportation hub.
F2 2. Provide pleasant places for people to wait for the
Harbour
Qu
ay Square ferry, or stay and relax after disembarking.
e ens Park
Qu
Sq
3. Provide engaging wayfinding to inform people of
our F3 Ferry
Harb
Terminal transport options, directions and nearby amenities.
Multi-modal Users
Wayfinding at Govenor’s Island, New York City, United Harbour Square Park and the Ferry Terminal are drawing
States
visitors from one of the busiest bike lanes in North
America. Fine-tune access by providing end-of-journey
parking and queuing options for cyclists.
Pilot to Permanent
50
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
8%
81
120 113
82 75 56
41
52%
597 4%
568 Staying 366 | Walking 1465
505 21%
25%
315
Weekday Weekend
366
132
Sitting 80
Standing
75%
Being Active
Bay St (Age Chart) Bay St (at Queens Quay) Queens Quay (at Harbour Sq)
108
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
51
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE G • Greatest spikes in pedestrian movement of all
KING ST AND BAY ST survey zones in the Downtown.
• People are generally moving through, not staying to
----------------------------------- spend time in the public spaces.
Locations
G1 King St W
G2 Bay Street
G3 King St and Bay St
Key Objectives
St W
King
1. Create engaging wayfinding and information points
Yong
G2
amenities.
Bay
ington
St create streetside invitations to stop and take in the
Well
energy of the city.
Pilot to Permanent
52
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
Hourly Average 7%
Staying 60 | Walking 1727
Staying
3%
60
111 48% 45%
50 71 63 47
15
Hourly Average
Staying 21 | Walking 520
Staying 23%
38% 4%
Weekday Weekend
21
Sitting 60
2 7 21 24 11
Standing
39%
Being Active
King St W (at Bay St) (Age Chart) King St W (at Bay St) Bay St (at King W) 6348
1518
0-6
7-14
15-30
31-64
65+
84 120 138
108
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
53
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE H • Consistent flow of people walking and staying
YORKVILLE PARK throughout the week.
• No sharp spikes or valleys, indicating a place people
----------------------------------- choose to spend time throughout the day and week.
Locations
H1 Bloor St
H2 Cumberland St
H3 Village of Yorkville Park
Key Objectives
St
and
berl
Cum
H2 ws 1. Indicate Yorkville Park from nearby major streets.
ir Me
Mayfa
2. Build community stewardship to ensure long-term
Bay
H3
Bell
success.
St
air S
Community Stewardship
Develop a communication strategy to keep neighbours
informed and involved in park activities. Promote
participatory events to foster a strong community link
with the park to ensure long-term success.
Pilot to Permanent
Wayfinding Elements
54
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
9%
71
119
79 71 75
32 48
89%
Hourly Average 7% 2%
Staying 86 | Walking 641
Staying
13%
Weekday Weekend
86
118 125 106
Sitting 54 78
32
Standing
Being Active 91%
Weekend
36% 52% 9% 2610 2772
1200 1056
0-6
7-14
15-30
31-64
65+
330 342
48
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
55
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE I • People are out on University Avenue at lunch hour.
UNIVERSITY AVENUE • Cycling volumes see a spike in the evening rush hour
commute.
----------------------------------- • Among the largest disparity between weekday and
Locations weekend pedestrian volumes and stationary activity
I1 University Ave levels of all zones surveyed in the Downtown.
I2 Elm Street
I3 University Ave and Elm St
Key Objectives
t
ard S
Gerr
Univ
I3
y St
Elm
St 2. Utilize the Avenue’s scale to optimize and enhance its
I1 I2 park, open space, pedestrian and cycling potential.
3. Enhance and expand the pedestrian realm within a
t
ard S
Edw park setting.
Green Connector
Make the Avenue a connector from the Civic Precinct to
Queen’s Park by providing safe cycling infrastructure
and desirable, canopied clearways for pedestrians.
Pilot to Permanent
56
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
Weekday Weekend
5
Sitting
5 1 5 4 10 6
Standing 87%
Being Active
University Ave (Age Chart) University Ave (at Bay St) Elm St (at King W)
Weekend
34% 48% 13%
2106 2184
0-6 858
7-14 258
15-30
31-64
65+
240
108
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
57
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE J • Shows a diverse mix of ages during the week.
DAVID CROMBIE PARK • Consistent weekday and weekend volumes of
pedestrians and cyclists.
----------------------------------- • Could be attracting more passersby to stop and
Locations stay.
J1 The Esplanade
J2 Lower Jarvis St
J3 David Crombie Park
Key Objectives
e
anad
Espl
The
1. Invite more people to stroll through, and stay!
Fred
J2
erick
ry La
ne enhance the pedestrian realm on adjacent streets.
Hen
Green Link
Generate a cohesive and connected green link from
Market Street in the west to the First Parliament Site
and the Distillery District in the east by creating a clear
and inviting path through the park.
Pilot to Permanent
58
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
10%
48
84 22% 55%
36 47 35 54 30
Hourly Average
Staying 32 | Walking 491
Staying 25%
32%
7%
Weekday Weekend
32
Sitting 53
24 48 28 22
18
Standing
Being Active 43%
The Esplanade (Age Chart) The Esplanade (at David Crombie Park) Lower Jarvis (at The Esplanade)
Weekend
41% 38% 13%
1032
0-6 822 708
7-14
15-30
31-64
65+
132
72
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
59
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE K • Sherbourne Street is a major cycling route, showing
MOSS PARK the largest morning spike of all survey zones in the
Downtown.
----------------------------------- • Moss Park sees a steady build of staying activity
Locations throughout the day and week.
K1 Sherbourne Street
K2 Queen Street E
K3 Moss Park
Key Objectives
Sher
er St
Shut 1. Promote citizen-led engagement and programming.
bo
urne
Social Pockets
Promote social gathering and community connection by
making it really inviting to stay with small, intimate and
sociable pockets embedded in the park.
Outdoor Bread Oven at Dufferin Grove Park, Toronto, Enhance Street Edges
Canada
Improve the pedestrian realm along park edges by
providing increased pedestrian space, a sense of relief,
and a feeling of a ‘street within a park’.
Pilot to Permanent
60
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
Hourly Average
16% Staying 104 | Walking 264
Staying 36%
39%
Weekday Weekend
104
155 169
119
Sitting 66 74
43
48%
Standing
Being Active
Sherbourne St (Age Chart) Sherbourne St (at Queens St) Queens St (at Stonecutters Ln)
Weekend
28% 52% 18%
0-6
7-14 552 582
450 348
15-30
31-64
65+
582
174
138
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
61
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE L • Parliament Street and Gerrard Street show high
ANNIVERSARY PARK cycling peaks during commuting hours.
• Anniversary Park is currently attracting few users.
-----------------------------------
Locations
L1 Parliament Street
L2 Gerrard Street
L3 Anniversary Park
Key Objectives
Parli
vans
dward E
ame
Woo
1. Provide safe and inclusive cycling infrastructure on
nt St
L3 L1
Parliament Street and Gerrard Street.
L2
Gerrard 2. Incorporate wayfinding markings into bike lanes to
Berk
St
n
ers L indicate nearby attractions and amenities.
eley
Drov
3. Provide bike services and amenities in the park.
St
Road Diet
Explore reducing the roadway width of the north section
of Gerrard Street East to create better connections to
the park.
Safer Cycling
Create protected cycling infrastructure on Parliament
Street and Gerrard Street to make the routes safer and
more accessible for users of all ages and abilities.
Pilot to Permanent
62
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
Hourly Average 4%
Staying 9 | Walking 367
Staying
32%
2%
Weekday Weekend 9
Sitting
2 5 9 6 20 11 64%
Standing
Being Active
Weekend
24% 57% 13%
0-6 594
7-14 288
15-30
31-64
65+
216 228
114 126
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
63
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE M • Eclectic mix of activity (sitting, standing, being
RIVERDALE PARK WEST active).
• A destination park: low numbers of passersby, but
----------------------------------- people are using the park.
Locations • Consistently high staying activity throughout the
M1 Riverdale Park Rd day and week.
M2 Winchester Street
M3 Riverdale Park West
Key Objectives
er St
hest
Winc
M2 Riverdale 1. Make the park a portal to the ravines by improving
Park West
visual and physical access for all users.
Sum
Raw
M3
ac
h St
on S
t M1
Carlt connections into the park and ravines and link to
St
S in clair
on
Gord nearby trails and cycling routes.
3. Draw more people to come and enjoy the park.
More Connections
Improve connections to nearby trails and cycling routes,
including Wellesley Street, River Street, the Lower Don
River Trail and Riverdale Park East.
Atlanta BeltLine, Atlanta, United States
City-wide Destination
Celebrate Indigenous cultures and histories of the Don
River Valley with a focus on creative placemaking and
interpretation.
Pilot to Permanent
64
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
41% 30%
47
68 92
36 44 34 44%
7
30%
Weekday Weekend
46
Sitting 55 54 65
32 38 31 69%
Standing
Being Active
Riverdale Park Rd (Age Chart) Riverdale Park Rd (at Carlton St) Winchester St (at Sumach St)
Weekend
10% 7% 27% 45% 11%
0-6
432
7-14 210
15-30
31-64
65+
66 66
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
65
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE N • Sees a diverse mix of age groups.
ST. JAMES TOWN • Despite the modest pedestrian traffic, as many
people stay here as in David Pecaut Square.
----------------------------------- • 1 in 6 people who walk by stick around.
Locations • Both on weekdays and the weekend, Ontario Lane
N1 Wellesley Street sees peak staying activity in the late afternoon.
N2 St. James Ave
N3 Ontario Lane
Key Objectives
Ave
N2
mes
St Ja 1. Support local commerce and creativity.
2. Support more activity throughout the day and week.
N3
3. Open up the interior spaces with fine grain
Blee
cker
Welle
rio S
t
Engaging Lighting
Make lighting functional, but also part of the draw with
creative, interactive lighting elements. Invite local
artists to participate in creative installations.
Bell Park Shared Street, a model for Ontario Lane, Seattle, Activate Open Spaces and Edges
United States
Explore opportunities to revitalize interior open spaces
and edges. Activate the edges with fine grain frontages,
micro retail and creative canopies and seating.
Pilot to Permanent
66
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
Hourly Average
Staying 52 | Walking 687
Staying
30%
8%
Weekday Weekend
52
127
Sitting 97
31 55 Surveyor 41%
Standing absent
29%
Being Active
Wellesley St (Age Chart) Wellesley St (at Ontario) St. James (at Ontario)
Weekend
8% 8% 23% 46% 16%
1116
0-6 684 720 726
7-14
15-30
31-64
65+
270
186
78
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
67
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE O • Low pedestrian volumes on Lowther Avenue and
HURON ST PLAYGROUND Huron Street.
• High volumes of cyclists during commuting hours.
----------------------------------- • Statistically insignificant staying activity.
Locations
O1 Lowther Ave
O2 Huron Street
O3 Huron St Playground
Key Objectives
Ave
O2 ther
Low
Huron
1. Make Huron Playground an outstanding all-season
St G
O3
rge S
ve
3. Create more reasons to come to the park by building
ur A
Arth
Prin
ce neighbourhood assets for the community.
Outstanding Play
Make Huron Playground an outstanding place to play by
providing unconventional and exciting all-season play
facilities.
Play-wait Areas
Create comfortable and attractive areas that invite
parents and caretakers to hang out while kids play.
Pilot to Permanent
68
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
5%
7
10 8 7 2 8 5
35%
Hourly Average
21% Staying 4 | Walking 118
Staying 37%
3%
Weekday Weekend 4
Sitting
3 11 4 1 2 3
Standing 42%
Being Active
Lowther Ave (Age Chart) Lowther Ave (at Huron) Huron St (at Lowther)
Weekend
42% 48% 7%
0-6
7-14 258 252 342 300
15-30
31-64
65+
234
192 186
114 108
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
69
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: SURVEY ZONES
Data Highlights
ZONE P • Leading cycling volumes on Adelaide Street during
ST. JAMES PARK evening commuting hours.
• Consistently high staying volumes on weekdays and
----------------------------------- weekends.
Locations
P1 King Street E
P2 Adelaide Street
P3 St. James Park
St Key Objectives
bard
Lom
P3
Chur
P1
St E
3. Opportunity to inject some of the qualities we heard
t
King
from engagement: lush and green, whimsy, play, etc.
Green Connections
Create a cohesive green link to connect via Market Lane
Park to St. Lawrence Market. Improve pedestrian mid-
block and intersection crossings.
Pilot to Permanent
70
STATIONARY ACTIVITY
8%
75
113 89
83 66 59
39
78%
Hourly Average 4%
12% Staying 57 | Walking 483
Staying
12%
Weekday Weekend 57
Sitting 71 88 61
31 50 39
Standing
84%
Being Active
Lowther Ave (Age Chart) King St (at St. James Park) Adelaide (at St. James Park)
Weekend
33% 53% 11%
1638
1266
0-6
7-14 578
15-30
31-64
65+
582
138 114
72
Weekday Weekend
Pedestrians
Cyclists
71
72
3. Summary Sheets
Data summary
73
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
Summary Sheets
WALKING
A closer look at the number of pedestrians observed walking on all streets surveyed in the Downtown on weekdays.
WEEKDAY
Location Name Zone Hourly 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Bay St G 2 3687
King St W E 2 2246
King St W E 1 2103
Queen St W D 2 2048
Bloor St W H 1 1859
King St W G 1 1727
King St W C 2 1140
King St E P 1 990
Queens Quay F 2 967
Kensington Ave A 2 942
University Ave I 1 863
Spadina Ave (N) C 1 805
Bay St F 1 800
Cumberland St H 2 790
University Ave I 2 661
Spadina Ave (S) C 1 620
Baldwin St A 1 511
The Esplanade J 1 479
Wellesley St E N 1 443
Elm St I 3 408
Dundas St W B 1 406
Lower Jarvis St J 2 392
Adelaide St P 2 376
Sherbourne St K 1 361
Parliament St L 1 357
St James Ave N 2 329
Bathurst St B 2 304
Queen St E K 2 266
Gerrard St E L 2 179
Winchester St M 2 158
Huron St O 2 156
Lowther Ave O 1 147
Riverdale Park Rd M 1 122
St Patricks Market D 1 33
74
WALKING
A closer look at the number of pedestrians observed walking on all streets surveyed in the Downtown on weekends.
WEEKEND
Location Name Zone Hourly 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Bay St F 1 1731
Queen St W D 2 1472
Queens Quay F 2 1465
King St W E 1 1126
Bloor St W H 1 1081
Bay St G 2 1056
King St W E 2 1028
Kensington Ave A 2 1022
King St W C 2 754
Wellesley St E N 1 687
Spadina Ave (N) C 1 666
Cumberland St H 2 641
Lower Jarvis St J 2 574
King St W G 1 520
The Esplanade J 1 491
King St E P 1 483
St James Ave N 2 482
Baldwin St A 1 475
Dundas St W B 1 427
Parliament St L 1 367
Spadina Ave (S) C 1 309
Bathurst St B 2 274
Sherbourne St K 1 264
University Ave I 2 216
University Ave I 1 209
Adelaide St P 2 202
Queen St E K 2 185
Winchester St M 2 154
Lowther Ave O 1 118
Gerrard St E L 2 108
Elm St I 3 97
Riverdale Park Rd M 1 91
Huron St O 2 66
St Patricks Market D 1 33
75
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
CYCLING
A closer look at the number of cyclists observed on all streets surveyed in the Downtown on weekdays.
WEEKDAY
76
CYCLING
A closer look at the number of cyclists observed on all streets surveyed in the Downtown on weekends.
WEEKEND
77
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
STAYING
A closer look at daily total staying activity in Downtown spaces on weekdays and weekends.
WEEKDAY
Location Name Zone Daily
Total 0 250 500 750 1000
Harbour Square Park F 3 487
Alexandra Park B 3 484
St. James Park P 3 449
Village of Yorkville Park H 3 424
King St. W/Bay St. G 3 357
Moss Park K 3 353
David Pecaut Square E 3 335
University Ave./Elm St. I 4 296
David Crombie Park J 3 286
Riverdale Park M 3 281
St James Ave./Wellesley St. E N 3 275
St. Patricks Square D 3 262
Clarence Square Park C 4 140
Anniversary Park L 3 134
Baldwin St/Kensington Ave A 3 120
Huron St. Playground O 3 40
WEEKEND
Location Name Zone Daily
Total 0 250 500 750 1000 2000
Harbour Square Park F 3 2197
Moss Park K 3 626
Village of Yorkville Park H 3 513
Alexandra Park B 3 400
St. Patricks Square D 3 381
St. James Park P 3 340
St James Ave./Wellesley St. E N 3 310
Riverdale Park M 3 275
Baldwin St/Kensington Ave A 3 249
David Crombie Park J 3 193
Clarence Square Park C 4 177
David Pecaut Square E 3 128
King St. W/Bay St. G 3 125
Anniversary Park L 3 53
University Ave./Elm St. I 4 31
Huron St. Playground O 3 24
78
GENDER
A closer look at the gender balance on streets in the Downtown on weekdays and weekends.
WEEKEND
Men Women
100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Bloor St W H1
Lowther Ave O1
University Ave I1
King St W E1
Spadina Ave C1
The Esplanade J1
Bay St F1
Dundas St W B1
King St E P1
Parliament St L1
King St W G1
Baldwin St A1
St Patricks Mrkt D1
Riverdale Park Rd M1
Wellesley St E N1
Sherbourne St K1
WEEKDAY
Men Women
100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
The Esplanade J1
University Ave I1
Lowther Ave O1
Bloor St W H1
King St W E1
Spadina Ave C1
Parliament St L1
King St E P1
Dundas St W B1
King St W G1
Baldwin St A1
Bay St F1
Wellesley St E N1
Riverdale Park Rd M1
Sherbourne St K1
St Patricks Mrkt D1
79
DOWNTOWN PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM PLAN: PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY
AGE
A closer look at streets that are age-friendly, as represented by the average number of pedestrians under 14 years old and
over 65 years old.
WEEKEND
Location Name Zone Daily Total 0 25% 50% 75% 100%
Wellesley St E N 1 32%
Riverdale Park Rd M 1 28%
Bay St F 1 23%
The Esplanade J 1 21%
Sherbourne St K 1 20%
Parliament St L 1 20%
University Ave I 1 18%
King St W E 1 17%
Dundas St W B 1 15%
King St E P 1 14%
Spadina Ave C 1 13%
Bloor St W H 1 13%
King St W G 1 12%
Baldwin St A 1 10%
Lowther Ave O 1 9%
St Patricks Market D 1 6%
80
INTERCEPT SURVEYS
In 2016, we interviewed 50 people in each of the following spaces: Yorkville Park, University Avenue, St. James Town, King
St and Bay St, Harbour Square, David Pecaut Square, and Alexandra Park.
81
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: INTERCEPT SURVEY DATA INDEX
VISIT FREQUENCY
Daily
Weekly
Every few months
Rarely
No Survey
DURATION
Walk through
5 min
10 min
15 min
30 min
1 hr +
UNPLANNED INTERACTIONS
Never
Often, but not today
Yes, Today
GENDER
Male
Female
Other
82
83
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: INTERCEPT SURVEY DATA INDEX
AGE
15-19
20-30
31-40
41-64
65+
EDUCATION
EMPLOYMENT
Employed full-time
Employed part-time
Unemployed
Student
Retired
0-10k
10-20k
20-30k
30-40k
40-50k
50-60k
60-80k
80-100k
100-125k
125-150k
150k+
84
85
PUBLIC SPACE PUBLIC LIFE STUDY: INTERCEPT SURVEY DATA INDEX
TRANSPORTATION MODE
86
87