Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/340535835
CITATIONS READS
0 549
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Sophia Choukas-Bradley on 09 April 2020.
This is a draft of a book chapter that has been accepted for publication by Springer in the
forthcoming book listed below, due for publication in 2020. This document is not the copy of
record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative chapter published by Springer. Please do
not copy or cite this version without permission of the first author (Sophia Choukas-Bradley;
schoukas@gmail.com).
Citation:
Choukas-Bradley, S. & Thoma, B. C. (in press). Mental health among LGBT youth. In W. I.
Wong & D. VanderLaan (Eds.), Gender and Sexuality Development: Contemporary Theory and
Research. New York: Springer.
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 2
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth report disproportionately high
rates of mental health problems when compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers,
including suicidality, depression, and substance use. These mental health disparities likely result
from experiences of minority stress, such as bullying and victimization, discrimination, and
internalized homo/transnegativity. Many of these stressors are modifiable, as are the protective
factors and coping strategies that provide most LGBT youth with resilience in the face of
minority stress. A comprehensive review of the literature on LGBT youth mental health is
beyond the scope of this brief chapter, and we do not provide a systematic review here. Rather,
our goal is to provide an overview of the state of this emerging literature. Specifically, we will
provide an overview of minority stress theory as it relates to the experiences of LGBT youth,
review current knowledge of mental health disparities among LGBT adolescents, describe how
minority stress experiences are related to the mental health of LGBT youth, and summarize our
Key Words: LGBT youth; adolescence; mental health disparities; sexual minority; gender
minority; depression; suicidality; NSSI; substance use
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 3
Introduction
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth report disproportionately high rates of mental
health problems when compared to their heterosexual peers, including suicidality, depression,
and substance use (Institute of Medicine, 2011; Marshal et al., 2011; Marshal et al., 2008).
Current estimates indicate that while only around 4% of U.S. adults identify as LGB (Gallup,
2017), approximately 15% of adolescents identify as LGB or questioning (Kann et al., 2018). It
is possible that these prevalence rates underestimate the number of sexual minority adolescents,
given that contemporary sexual minority youth use a variety of labels beyond “lesbian, gay, and
bisexual,” such as “pansexual” and “mostly heterosexual”; furthermore, some youth who identify
as “heterosexual” report same-sex attraction and/or behavior (e.g., Stewart, Spivey, Widman,
Choukas-Bradley, & Prinstein, 2019). Health disparities research has documented higher rates of
mental health problems among youth who identify as LGB, among youth who report sexual or
romantic attraction to individuals of the same sex, and also among youth who engage in same-
sex sexual behavior (Marshal et al., 2011). While the mental health of transgender adolescents
(adolescents who identify with a gender identity that diverges from their gender assigned at
birth) has been examined less frequently, initial evidence indicates that transgender adolescents
experience very high rates of suicidality and depressive symptoms (Connolly, Zervos, Barone,
Johnson, & Joseph, 2016; Thoma et al., 2019; Toomey, Syvertsen, & Shramko, 2018).
Prevalence rates for transgender youth are difficult to estimate, as the number of adolescents
seeking treatment at gender care clinics has increased in recent years (Handler et al., 2019), but
recent estimates suggest that 1.8% of U.S. adolescents identify as transgender, with higher
endorsement of transgender identities among adolescents assigned female at birth (Johns et al.,
2019; Zucker, 2017). Mental health disparities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 4
(LGBT) adolescents likely result from their experiences of minority stress in the form of
discrimination and stigmatization. This chapter will provide an overview of minority stress
theory as it relates to the experiences of LGBT adolescents, review current knowledge of mental
health disparities among LGBT adolescents, describe how minority stress experiences are related
to the mental health of LGBT youth, and summarize our current understanding of resilience and
between LGB and heterosexual individuals (Meyer, 1995, 2003). LGB individuals encounter
stress within their social environments in the form of discrimination based upon known or
perceived sexual orientation, and LGB people also internalize negative societal and cultural
messages about their minority group (Meyer, 1995, 2003). Meyer (2003) theorized minority
stressors fall into two distinct categories: distal stressors and proximal stressors. Distal stressors
environment (Meyer, 2003). Discrimination can include verbal harassment, physical violence,
property crimes, housing or employment discrimination, and sexual assault (Katz-Wise & Hyde,
2012). LGB adolescents report more frequent experiences of bullying and victimization by peers
than heterosexual adolescents (Berlan, Corliss, Field, Goodman, & Austin, 2010; Fedewa & Ahn,
2011; Friedman et al., 2011; Zaza, Kann, & Barrios, 2016). In recent nationally representative data
from adolescents in the United States, 34% of LGB adolescents reported being bullied at school
during the past year compared with 19% of heterosexual adolescents (Zaza et al., 2016).
Victimization disparities based on sexual orientation have been detected in children as young as
Proximal minority stressors are internal processes that can be harmful for LGB
interactions, and concealment of sexual orientation from others (Meyer, 2003). LGB individuals
with higher levels of internalized homonegativity report more negative attitudes about
themselves because they are LGB (DiPlacido, 1998; Meyer, 2003; Shidlo, 1994). Furthermore,
LGB individuals may experience anxiety or fear that they will experience rejection by others
because of their sexual orientation (Meyer, 2003; Pachankis, Goldfried, & Ramrattan, 2008).
Because sexual orientation is a concealable stigmatized identity and LGB individuals’ minority
status might not be readily apparent in many social interactions (Pachankis, 2007; Quinn &
Chaudoir, 2009), LGB individuals must decide when to conceal and disclose their sexual
orientation to others and may have to repeatedly disclose their minority status, causing additional
stress (Meyer, 2003; Pachankis, 2007). Many studies indicate that bisexual youth are at even
higher risk for mental health issues than lesbian and gay youth (Marshal et al., 2011; Marshal et
al., 2008), with minority stress theories highlighting the role of stressors related to “double
discrimination” (i.e., rejection from both the heterosexual and LGBT communities) and
invalidation of one’s identity as “just a phase” (Dyar, Feinstein, & Davila, 2019; Dyar &
London, 2018).
While minority stress has been directly linked to mental health (Meyer, 2003),
through which minority stress affects mental health among LGB individuals (Hatzenbuehler,
2009). Hatzenbuehler (2009) theorized that stressful experiences negatively affect the health of
LGB individuals by causing emotion dysregulation and creating interpersonal and social
problems that can impoverish social support. In addition, LGB individuals who experience
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 6
minority stress are more likely to report feelings of hopelessness and low self-esteem, and these
cognitions and beliefs may leave LGB people more susceptible to negative outcomes in the face
of stress (Hatzenbuehler, 2009). Other factors, such as more liberal social norms about substance
use in the LGB community, may also contribute to health disparities (Hatzenbuehler, 2009).
While minority stress theory is a useful lens through which to understand the experiences
of LGB individuals, Meyer (2003) did not explicitly address the developmentally-specific
experiences and social contexts of adolescents (Goldbach & Gibbs, 2017). Adolescence is a
developmental period during which individuals are highly attuned to feedback from peers, and
peer rejection and victimization can cause great distress (Choukas-Bradley & Prinstein, 2014).
LGB youth often first disclose their sexual orientation during adolescence (Katz-Wise et al.,
2017), and others’ reactions to their disclosure can cause further stress. LGB adolescents who
report negative reactions to their sexual orientation disclosures have higher rates of mental health
that, although peer relationships and peer feedback reach paramount importance, parents also
remain important for adolescents’ basic needs and psychological well-being. Parental rejection of
sexual orientation is common among LGB adolescents, and parental rejection during adolescence
has been linked with increased risk for suicidality and depression during young adulthood among
LGB individuals (Ryan, Huebner, Diaz, & Sanchez, 2009). Furthermore, some evidence indicates
LGB adolescent mental health is related to broad societal attitudes related to sexual orientation.
For example, LGB adolescents who live in counties in the United States where there is a positive
environment for sexual minority individuals (including a higher proportion of same-sex couples
and more schools with anti-bullying policies and gay-straight alliances) report lower levels of
It is also important to consider that minority stress theory as described by Meyer (2003)
applies specifically to the experiences of LGB individuals, and minority stress experiences of
transgender individuals likely differ in important ways (Hendricks & Testa, 2012). Like LGB
adolescents, transgender adolescents experience higher rates of peer victimization than their non-
transgender peers (Perez-Brumer, Day, Russell, & Hatzenbuehler, 2017; Sterzing, Ratliff,
Gartner, McGeough, & Johnson, 2017). Victimization is a common experience for transgender
adolescents, and 69% of transgender adolescents report they have been harassed because of their
gender identity during the past year (Veale, Peter, Travers, & Saewyc, 2017). More research is
needed regarding the role of victimization in transgender adolescents’ suicidality, but in one
online sample of U.S. transgender and gender-nonconforming young people ages 14-to-30 years,
higher likelihood of past-year suicide attempt (Kuper, Adams, & Mustanski, 2018). However,
(Hendricks & Testa, 2012). In particular, having one’s gender identity perceived accurately by
others within social contexts, or passing as one’s true gender identity, is an important
interpersonal construct that is related to distress and mental health among transgender individuals
(Bockting, Miner, Romine, Hamilton, & Coleman, 2013; Dubois, 2012). Transgender individuals
often initiate a social gender transition during adolescence, including disclosing their gender
identity to parents and peers, asking others to refer to them by a chosen name, using different
pronouns that align with their true gender identity, and changing their hairstyle and/or clothing to
express their gender in a way that accords with their true gender identity (Connolly et al., 2016;
Grossman & D'augelli, 2007; Russell, Pollitt, Li, & Grossman, 2018). Many questions remain
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 8
regarding whether and how progression through these transition steps is related to transgender
adolescents’ mental health. Further research is required to understand how the minority stress
In this section, we provide an overview of the empirical literature regarding mental health
disparities related to adolescents’ sexual and gender minority identities. A comprehensive review
of the literature on LGBT youth mental health is beyond the scope of this brief chapter, and we
do not provide a systematic review here. Rather, our goal is to provide an overview of the state
Suicidality
Suicide is the second leading cause of death among adolescents (Kochanek, Murphy, Xu, &
Tejada-Vera, 2016), and LGB adolescents are at high risk for suicidality. Compared with
heterosexual adolescents, LGB adolescents have two-times the odds of suicidal ideation (Marshal et
al., 2011). Disparities are even larger when examining more severe forms of suicidality, as LGB
adolescents have much higher odds of suicide attempts (OR = 3.18) and suicide attempts requiring
medical attention (OR = 4.17) than their heterosexual peers (Marshal et al., 2011). Recent nationally
representative adolescent health data from the 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System
(YRBSS) indicate 43% of U.S. LGB adolescents have seriously considered suicide in the past year,
38% have made a suicide plan, 29% have attempted suicide in the past year, and 9% have made an
attempt requiring medical attention (Zaza et al., 2016). Data from the same survey revealed
especially high levels of suicidality among bisexual girls, with 35% attempting suicide in the past
year and 12% making a suicide attempt requiring medical attention (Taliaferro, Gloppen,
Muehlenkamp, & Eisenberg, 2017). Comparatively, only 6% of heterosexual adolescents within the
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 9
same sample reported attempting suicide during the past year (Zaza et al., 2016). LGB adolescents
also report higher levels of non-suicidal self-injury (self-harm behaviors, such as cutting oneself,
without intent to end one’s life) when compared to their heterosexual peers (Almeida, Johnson,
among LGB adolescents, and peer victimization is the most commonly examined stressor. Peer
peers. LGB adolescents who report more frequent experiences of peer victimization report higher
rates of suicidality (Espelage, Merrin, & Hatchel, 2018), including suicidal ideation (Birkett,
Espelage, & Koenig, 2009; Espelage, Aragon, Birkett, & Koenig, 2008), suicide attempts
(Bontempo & D'Augelli, 2002; Fedewa & Ahn, 2011), and non-suicidal self-injury (Almeida et
al., 2009; Liu & Mustanski, 2012). Researchers have also examined whether peer victimization
accounts for differences in suicidality outcomes between LGB and heterosexual adolescents.
Bontempo and colleagues (2002) found that victimization experiences mediated the association
between LGB-status and suicidality among adolescents. Within this study, LGB adolescents who
reported high levels of victimization reported more suicide attempts during the past year when
(Bontempo & D'Augelli, 2002), indicating that victimization experiences have an especially
deleterious effect among LGB adolescents. Similarly, peer victimization predicted higher levels
of suicidality among LGB adolescents over the next six months in a longitudinal study, and
victimization mediated the association between LGB-status and suicidality (Burton, Marshal,
Chisolm, Sucato, & Friedman, 2013). Finally, victimization was found to predict increases in
both future suicidality and self-harm behavior within a sample of LGBT youth ages 16-to-20
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 10
Suicidality has been examined less frequently among transgender adolescents, but initial
results indicate transgender adolescents experience high rates of suicidal ideation and attempts
when compared to their cisgender peers (Becerra-Culqui et al., 2018; Connolly et al., 2016;
Eisenberg et al., 2017; Perez-Brumer et al., 2017; Peterson, Matthews, Copps‐Smith, & Conard,
2017; Toomey et al., 2018; Veale, Watson, Peter, & Saewyc, 2017). Sixty-one percent of
transgender adolescents report a lifetime history of suicidal ideation, and 31% report attempting
suicide during their lifetime (Eisenberg et al., 2017). In one recent study, rates of suicidality were
higher among transgender adolescents than both their cisgender heterosexual and cisgender
sexual minority peers (Fox, Choukas-Bradley, Salk, Marshal, & Thoma, 2020). Recent work
indicates that rates of suicidal behavior may be even higher among some subgroups of
suicide attempts (Toomey et al., 2018). However, inadequate measurement of gender assigned at
birth and current gender identity has hampered empirical efforts to estimate rates of suicidality
among transgender adolescents, and additional research that uses comprehensive measures of
transgender adolescents is needed as well. Initial evidence indicates transgender adolescents who
experience higher levels of victimization report higher rates of suicidal ideation, suicidal
behavior, and non-suicidal self-injury (Clements-Nolle, Marx, & Katz, 2006; Hatchel, Valido,
De Pedro, Huang, & Espelage, 2019; Perez-Brumer et al., 2017; Veale, Peter, et al., 2017; Veale,
Watson, et al., 2017). Additional psychosocial factors could protect against or confer risk for
suicidal behavior among transgender adolescents. Initial evidence from one cross-sectional study
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 11
indicates that completing social transition steps within multiple social contexts (i.e., using a
chosen name at home, at school, and at work) is associated with fewer mental health problems,
including suicidal ideation and behavior (Russell et al., 2018). Further research is required to
understand how progressing through gender transition milestones is related to the severity of
Finally, several studies of LGBT youth have provided evidence consistent with the
the desire for suicide is developed through a combination of perceived burdensomeness and low
belongingness. In several studies, perceived burdensomeness has been found to mediate the
association between several minority stressors and depressive symptoms among LGBT
adolescents in the U.S. and the Netherlands, including sexual orientation victimization,
internalized homonegativity, and coming-out stress (Baams, Dubas, Russell, Buikema, & van
Aken, 2018; Baams, Grossman, & Russell, 2015). Regarding low belongingness—in other
words, social alienation—several of the studies regarding interpersonal stressors above (e.g.,
victimization) may provide indirect support for this part of the theory.
In addition to the disparities discussed above related to suicidality, LGBT adolescents are
significantly more likely than their cisgender heterosexual peers to report depressive symptoms.
A meta-analysis found an overall weighted effect size for the association between sexual
orientation and depression of d = 0.33 (Marshal et al., 2011). In one study, 15% of LGBT youth
met diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (Mustanski, Garofalo, & Emerson, 2010).
Higher levels of depressive symptoms during adolescence could negatively influence the long-
term mental health of LGB individuals, as longitudinal studies indicate that depressive symptoms
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 12
among LGB individuals persist from adolescence into adulthood (Marshal et al., 2013;
Needham, 2012). Disparities also likely begin prior to adolescence, as higher levels of depressive
symptoms were detected by age 11 among sexual minority girls in one Dutch study (la Roi,
Kretschmer, Dijkstra, Veenstra, & Oldehinkel, 2016). Several studies indicate that transgender
youth also experience high levels of depressive symptoms (see Connolly et al., 2016).
As with studies focused on suicidality, research suggests that minority stressors mediate
the association between sexual minority identity and depressive symptoms. A recent systematic
review found that key risk factors for LGB youth depression include internalized sexual
orientation-related oppression, stress from hiding and managing one’s identity, parental
rejection, and victimization (Hall, 2018). With regard to distal stressors, many studies have
highlighted the roles of victimization, parental rejection, and discrimination in LGBT youth
victimization mediated the association between sexual minority identity and both depressive
symptoms and suicidality (Burton et al., 2013). Other studies have also found both victimization
and parental rejection to partially mediate the association between sexual minority identity and
depressive symptoms (la Roi et al., 2016; Martin-Storey & Crosnoe, 2012; Mittleman, 2019;
Robinson, Espelage, & Rivers, 2013; Toomey, Ryan, Diaz, Card, & Russell, 2010). Results from
a school-based study indicate that perceived discrimination accounted for the higher levels of
depressive symptoms among LGBT youth (Almeida et al., 2009). Other studies suggest that the
discrimination experiences that lead to depressive symptoms may be subtle, such as in the form
Proximal minority stressors have also been linked to depression and other internalizing
symptoms. For example, internalized homonegativity has been found to be associated with
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 13
higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms in samples of youth across several countries,
including the U.S., Belgium, and Israel (Cox, Vanden Berghe, Dewaele, & Vincke, 2010; Page,
Lindahl, & Malik, 2013; Shilo & Savaya, 2012). Additionally, in a sample of transgender
adolescents seeking care at a U.S. gender clinic, those with higher levels of internalized
transnegativity were more likely to meet diagnostic criteria for both major depressive disorder
and generalized anxiety disorder (Chodzen, Hidalgo, Chen, & Garofalo, 2019). Other studies
have found that internalized homonegativity mediates the association between environmental
stressors and internalizing symptoms. For example, in a community sample of U.S. sexual
minority youth, religious stress related to sexual orientation and other sexual orientation-related
stressors were associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety, and these associations were
Substance Use
LGB adolescents use substances at high rates, with a meta-analysis suggesting these rates
are almost three times that of their heterosexual peers (Marshal et al., 2008). A recent study
using state-representative data from California found that substance use was 2.5-4 times higher
among transgender youth compared to cisgender peers (Day, Fish, Perez-Brumer, Hatzenbuehler,
& Russell, 2017). Examining data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult
Health (Add Health), Dermody and colleagues (2014) found disparities between sexual minority
and heterosexual individuals over time in hazardous drinking, from adolescence through
participants’ late 20s and early 30s; disparities increased as participants reached young
adulthood. LGB youth have higher rates of cigarette, alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, and injection
drug use when compared to heterosexual peers (Marshal et al., 2008), and recent evidence
indicates LGB adolescents have higher rates of vaping as well (Coulter, Bersamin, Russell, &
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 14
Mair, 2018). The vast majority of studies have used brief measures to assess substance use
among LGB youth and their peers (Marshal et al., 2008), and more research is required to
examine disparities in substance use disorder diagnoses between LGB and heterosexual youth.
As with suicidality and internalizing problems, a growing body of research highlights the
important role of minority stressors in LGBT adolescents’ substance use. A meta-analysis found
that victimization, negative reactions to adolescents’ coming out, and sexual orientation-related
stress were each associated with higher levels of adolescents’ substance use (Goldbach, Tanner-
Smith, Bagwell, & Dunlap, 2014). Although the data are now more than two decades old, a study
using 1995 YRBSS data found that the combination of LGB status and high levels of at-school
victimization predicted the highest levels of substance use, as well as suicidality and sexual risk
behavior; importantly, at low levels of victimization, LGB youths’ substance use, suicidality, and
sexual risk behaviors were similar to those of their heterosexual peers (Bontempo & D’Augelli,
2002). Updated data from the 2015 YRBSS revealed that bisexual adolescents specifically were
higher in alcohol use and binge drinking than their heterosexual peers, and bullying mediated the
association between sexual minority identity and alcohol use only among bisexual girls (Phillips
recruited from adolescent health clinics found support for the mediating role of victimization in
the longitudinal association between LGB status and substance use (Dermody, Marshal, Burton,
& Chisolm, 2016). Fewer studies have examined substance use disparities among transgender
youth. However, both the California-wide study discussed above (Day et al., 2017) and a large-
scale national U.S. study (Reisner, Greytak, Parsons, & Ybarra, 2015) also revealed that
victimization mediated the association between transgender identity and substance use.
It is critically important to note that many LGBT youth do not experience mental health
problems. Protective factors and coping strategies have been identified that may help mitigate
against the risks posed by minority stressors. In this section, we provide a brief overview of some
of the protective factors and coping strategies that have received research attention and that may
Several studies highlight the importance of social support from friends and the LGBT
community in promoting positive identity development (Bruce, Harper, & Bauermeister, 2015).
For example, a large-scale study of schools in Wisconsin found that LGBT youth in schools with
Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) reported lower levels of truancy, substance use, suicide attempts,
and risky sexual behaviors, as compared to youth in schools without GSAs (Poteat, Sinclair,
DiGiovanni, Koenig, & Russell, 2013). Additionally, in qualitative interviews, sexual minority
adolescents highlighted the importance of having LGBT centers and organizations for support, as
well as the protective effects of having close relationships with other individuals who identify as
LGBT (Goldbach & Gibbs, 2015). Furthermore, across many studies, support from parents and
peers has been found to be important in protecting against substance use, depression, and
psychological distress (Goldbach et al., 2014; Hall, 2018; McConnell, Birkett, & Mustanski,
With regard to transgender youth, more well-designed longitudinal research studies are
needed, but the work of Olson and colleagues suggests that children and adolescents who are
socially transitioned have similar levels of depression, and marginally higher anxiety, when
samples (Durwood, McLaughlin, & Olson, 2017; Olson, Durwood, DeMeules, & McLaughlin,
2016). Socially transitioned children’s psychosocial well-being also appears to be similar to that
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 16
of age- and gender-matched cisgender gender-nonconforming children (Wong, van der Miesen,
Li, MacMullin, & VanderLaan, 2019). Another cross-sectional study found that youth who used
their chosen name in more contexts (i.e., a proxy for gender affirmation) reported lower levels of
depressive symptoms, suicidal thoughts, and suicidal behavior (Russell et al., 2018). Thus,
engaging in a social gender transition within supportive social contexts might have the potential
to ameliorate mental health disparities among transgender youth, but more research on this topic
is required.
helping to explain why LGBT youth have higher levels of suicidality, depression, and substance
use than their peers. It is heartening to note that, overall, experiences of victimization may
decrease over time for LGBT youth, both with regard to historical trends and developmental
trajectories. First, a study of 11 YRBSS cohorts from 1995 to 2015 revealed that rates of school-
based victimization decreased among all students, and especially steep declines were revealed
among LGBT youth (Olsen, Vivolo-Kantor, Kann, & Milligan, 2017). Additionally, a
community study of adolescents and young adults using an accelerated longitudinal study design
found that while experiences of victimization predicted increases in psychological distress over
time, overall, both victimization and distress decreased over time (Birkett, Newcomb, &
Mustanski, 2015).
In this chapter, we provided an overview of the state of the literature on mental health
among LGBT youth. Tremendous advances have been made in recent years in our understanding
of both mental health disparities and the minority stressors that may underlie them. That said, the
research literature has been characterized by several substantial limitations that must be
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 17
addressed in future work. First, the majority of studies on sexual minority youth use cross-
sectional study designs and focus on older adolescents and young adults, with fewer studies
following youth longitudinally over the course of adolescence, and a strikingly limited number of
studies focused on pre-adolescent children (although see this chapter’s Spotlight Feature for a
description of recent research on pre-adolescent children). With youth coming out at younger
ages (Dunlap, 2016), it may be more feasible for future studies to recruit samples of children and
younger adolescents who identify as LGBT and to follow their developmental outcomes over
time.
developmental effects and historical change, as has been discussed by Mustanski (2015). Within
the U.S. specifically, support for LGBT individuals and couples has increased dramatically, both
with regard to personal attitudes and public policies (Pew Research Center, 2017). That said,
there is substantial variability in support and protections across geographical regions and based
on religious, political, and other identities (GLAAD, 2018; Pew Research Center, 2017).
Furthermore, at the time of our writing this chapter, several protections for sexual and gender
minority individuals are at risk of being weakened or removed (e.g., Goodnough, Green, &
Sanger-Katz, 2019). Youths’ experiences of minority stressors and mental health sequelae may
vary based on such structural and cultural shifts. Questions related to the sociocultural context of
LGBT youth development remain critically important avenues for future research.
Another emerging area of scholarship in this field that warrants further study concerns
intersectionality. Although many studies included in this chapter included racially and ethnically
diverse samples and some directly addressed issues related to intersectionality, a thorough
discussion of intersectionality was beyond the scope of the current chapter. According to
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 18
minority stress theories, belonging to multiple minority groups may be associated with unique
stressors and experiences of discrimination (Cole, 2009; Else-Quest & Hyde, 2016). Based on
these theories, we would expect that LGBT youth who also identify as racial/ethnic minorities
may experience more minority stressors (e.g., higher levels of discrimination) and may be more
at risk for mental health issues. However, research is mixed regarding whether such intersecting
identities confer greater risk, and it is possible that racial/ethnic minority LGBT youth may be
better equipped to cope with minority stress related to their LGBT identity, which emerges
during later childhood and adolescence, because they have previously developed effective
strategies to cope with racist discrimination and stigmatization earlier in development (c.f., Fox
et al., 2020; Thoma & Huebner, 2013; Velez, Moradi, & Deblaere, 2015). Future research with
LGBT youth should prioritize collecting sufficiently large and diverse samples of youth,
allowing us to build a stronger understanding of how mental health and minority stress
experiences differ across racial/ethnic subgroups of LGBT youth. Finally, the vast majority of
existing research examining health disparities between LGBT adolescents and their peers has
been conducted with samples collected in North America, Europe, and Australia (Marshal et al.,
2008). Given cultural differences in acceptance of and attitudes toward diverse sexual and gender
identities across the globe (Kite, Togans, & Case, 2018; Smith, Son, & Kim, 2014), as well as
limited legal protections for LGBT individuals in many countries, we cannot generalize using
existing evidence of LGBT youth mental health derived largely from Western societies.
Additional international research on the health and well-being of LGBT youth across the globe is
required.
This chapter aimed to provide a concise overview of research on mental health among
LGBT youth, with an emphasis on internalizing symptoms, substance misuse, and suicidality.
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 19
This chapter did not address mental health disparities related to autism spectrum disorder (but
see the Spotlight Feature in this chapter by Anna van der Miesen), eating disorders, externalizing
problems and health risk behaviors beyond substance use, or severe psychopathology such as
bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Connolly and colleagues (2016) provide a review of the
mental health of transgender youth, but in this evolving field, many new studies have since
emerged.
A critically important area for future work involves the development of evidence-based
prevention and intervention efforts. Many researchers have called for mental health interventions
tailored to the unique minority stress experiences of LGBT youth. Mustanski (2015) outlined the
need for the development of interventions that “promote and build on natural resiliencies in the
face of chronic [sexual minority] stressors” (p. 212) and that emphasize prevention and health
promotion. A special challenge concerns how to reach young LGBT adolescents during the
processes of identity development during which vulnerability may be high (Mustanski, 2015).
Online recruitment and interventions may help with this effort (Mustanski, 2015). Finally,
successful interventions will likely need to address the complex sociocultural and interpersonal
systems in which adolescents are embedded, and interventions delivered online, including
family-based interventions (e.g., Huebner, Rullo, Thoma, McGarrity, & Mackenzie, 2013), may
Conclusion
In conclusion, recent advances in basic research on LGBT youth mental health highlight
disparities between LGBT youth and their non-LGBT peers, and identify minority stressors that
may contribute to those disparities. Many of these stressors are modifiable, as are the protective
factors and coping strategies that provide most LGBT youth with resilience in the face of
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 20
minority stress. It is now vital for the field to develop, test, and disseminate prevention and
intervention programs to further mitigate these risks and allow LGBT youth to thrive.
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 21
References
Almeida, J., Johnson, R. M., Corliss, H. L., Molnar, B. E., & Azrael, D. (2009). Emotional
distress among LGBT youth: The influence of perceived discrimination based on sexual
009-9397-9
Baams, L., Dubas, J. S., Russell, S. T., Buikema, R. L., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2018). Minority
Baams, L., Grossman, A. H., & Russell, S. T. (2015). Minority stress and mechanisms of risk for
depression and suicidal ideation among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Developmental
Becerra-Culqui, T. A., Liu, Y., Nash, R., Cromwell, L., Flanders, W. D., Getahun, D., . . .
Berlan, E. D., Corliss, H. L., Field, A. E., Goodman, E., & Austin, S. B. (2010). Sexual
orientation and bullying among adolescents in the growing up today study. Journal of
Birkett, M., Espelage, D. L., & Koenig, B. (2009). LGB and questioning students in schools: The
Birkett, M., Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2015). Does it get better? A longitudinal
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.275
Bockting, W. O., Miner, M. H., Romine, R. E. S., Hamilton, A., & Coleman, E. (2013). Stigma,
Bontempo, D. E., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2002). Effects of at-school victimization and sexual
Bruce, D., Harper, G. W., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2015). Minority stress, positive identity
minority male youth. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(3), 287-
296. doi:10.1037/sgd0000128
Burton, C. M., Marshal, M. P., Chisolm, D. J., Sucato, G. S., & Friedman, M. S. (2013). Sexual
minority youth: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(3), 394-
402. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9901-5
Chodzen, G., Hidalgo, M. A., Chen, D., & Garofalo, R. (2019). Minority stress factors associated
Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Peer relationships and the development of
Clements-Nolle, K., Marx, R., & Katz, M. (2006). Attempted suicide among transgender
Connolly, M. D., Zervos, M. J., Barone, C. J., Johnson, C. C., & Joseph, C. L. (2016). The
Coulter, R. W., Bersamin, M., Russell, S. T., & Mair, C. (2018). The effects of gender- and
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.004
Cox, N., Vanden Berghe, W., Dewaele, A., & Vincke, J. (2010). Acculturation strategies and
mental health in gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
Day, J. K., Fish, J. N., Perez-Brumer, A., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Russell, S. T. (2017).
Dermody, S. S., Marshal, M. P., Burton, C. M., & Chisolm, D. J. (2016). Risk of heavy drinking
doi:10.1111/add.13409
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 24
Dermody, S. S., Marshal, M. P., Cheong, J., Burton, C., Hughes, T., Aranda, F., & Friedman, M.
DiPlacido, J. (1998). Minority stress among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: A consequence of
orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 138-
decline in ambulatory blood pressure, and C-reactive protein levels among transgender
Dunlap, A. (2016). Changes in coming out milestones across five age cohorts. Journal of Gay &
Durwood, L., McLaughlin, K. A., & Olson, K. R. (2017). Mental health and self-worth in
socially transitioned transgender youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child and
Dyar, C., Feinstein, B. A., & Davila, J. (2019). Development and validation of a brief version of
doi:10.1007/s10508-018-1157-z
Dyar, C., & London, B. (2018). Longitudinal examination of a bisexual-specific minority stress
process among bisexual cisgender women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(3), 342-
360. doi:10.1177/0361684318768233
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 25
Eisenberg, M. E., Gower, A. L., McMorris, B. J., Rider, G. N., Shea, G., & Coleman, E. (2017).
170. doi:10.1177/0361684316629797
Espelage, D. L., Aragon, S. R., Birkett, M., & Koenig, B. W. (2008). Homophobic teasing,
psychological outcomes, and sexual orientation among high school students: What
influence do parents and schools have? School Psychology Review, 37(2), 202. Retrieved
from https://www.nasponline.org/publications/periodicals/spr/
Espelage, D. L., Merrin, G. J., & Hatchel, T. (2018). Peer victimization and dating violence
among LGBTQ youth: The impact of school violence and crime on mental health
doi:10.1177/1541204016680408
Fedewa, A. L., & Ahn, S. (2011). The effects of bullying and peer victimization on sexual-
Fox, K., Choukas-Bradley, S., Salk, R. H., Marshal, M. P., & Thoma, B. C. (2020). Mental
health among sexual and gender minority adolescents: Examining interactions with race
publication.
Friedman, M. S., Marshal, M. P., Guadamuz, T. E., Wei, C., Wong, C. F., Saewyc, E. M., &
physical abuse, and peer victimization among sexual minority and sexual nonminority
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.190009
https://news.gallup.com/poll/201731/lgbt-identification-rises.aspx2017
Goldbach, J. T., & Gibbs, J. J. (2015). Strategies employed by sexual minority adolescents to
cope with minority stress. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(3),
297-306. doi:10.1037/sgd0000124
Goldbach, J. T., & Gibbs, J. J. (2017). A developmentally informed adaptation of minority stress
doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.007
Goldbach, J. T., Tanner-Smith, E. E., Bagwell, M., & Dunlap, S. (2014). Minority stress and
350-363. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0393-7
Goodnough, A., Green, E.L., & Sanger-Katz, M. (2019). Trump administration proposes
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/24/us/politics/donald-trump-transgender-
protections.html
Grossman, A. H., & D'augelli, A. R. (2007). Transgender youth and life-threatening behaviors.
Hall, W. J. (2018). Psychosocial risk and protective factors for depression among lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and queer youth: A systematic review. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(3), 263-
316. doi:10.1080/00918369.2017.1317467
Handler, T., Hojilla, J. C., Varghese, R., Wellenstein, W., Satre, D. D., & Zaritsky, E. (2019).
doi:10.1542/peds.2019-1368
Hatchel, T., Valido, A., De Pedro, K. T., Huang, Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2019). Minority stress
among transgender adolescents: The role of peer victimization, school belonging, and
018-1168-3
Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2009). How does sexual minority stigma “get under the skin”? A
doi:10.1037/a0016441
Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2011). The social environment and suicide attempts in lesbian, gay, and
Heatherington, L., & Lavner, J. A. (2008). Coming to terms with coming out: Review and
Hendricks, M. L., & Testa, R. J. (2012). A conceptual framework for clinical work with
doi:10.1037/a0029597
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 28
Huebner, D. M., Rullo, J. E., Thoma, B. C., McGarrity, L. A., & Mackenzie, J. (2013). Piloting
Lead with Love: A film-based intervention to improve parents’ responses to their lesbian,
gay, and bisexual children. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 34(5), 359-
369. doi:10.1007/s10935-013-0319-y
Institute of Medicine. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people:
Press.
Joiner, T. E., Jr. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johns, M. M., Lowry, R., Andrzejewski, J., Barrios L. C., Demissie, Z., McManus, T., …
victimization, substance use, suicide risk, and sexual risk behaviors among high school
students — 19 states and large urban school districts, 2017. Morbidity and Mortality
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Queen, B., … Ethier, K. A.
(2018). Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2017. Morbidity and Mortality
Katz-Wise, S. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual
doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.637247
Katz-Wise, S. L., Rosario, M., Calzo, J. P., Scherer, E. A., Sarda, V., & Austin, S. B. (2017).
minority stressors with internalizing mental health symptoms among sexual minority
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 29
0964-y
Kaufman, T. M. L., Baams, L., & Dubas, J. S. (2017). Microaggressions and depressive
symptoms in sexual minority youth: The roles of rumination and social support.
doi:10.1037/sgd0000219
Kite, M. E., Togans, L. J., & Case, K. A. (2018). Cross-cultural attitudes toward sexual
Kochanek, K., Murphy, S., Xu, J., & Tejada-Vera, B. (2016). Deaths: Final data for 2014.
Kuper, L. E., Adams, N., & Mustanski, B. S. (2018). Exploring cross-sectional predictors of
suicide ideation, attempt, and risk in a large online sample of transgender and gender
doi:10.1089/lgbt.2017.0259
la Roi, C., Kretschmer, T., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2016). Disparities
in depressive symptoms between heterosexual and lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth in a
Dutch cohort: The TRAILS study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(3), 440-456.
doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0403-0
Liu, R. T., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Suicidal ideation and self-harm in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.023
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 30
Marshal, M. P., Dermody, S. S., Cheong, J., Burton, C. M., Friedman, M. S., Aranda, F., &
heterosexual and sexual minority youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(8), 1243-
1256. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9970-0
Marshal, M. P., Dietz, L. J., Friedman, M. S., Stall, R., Smith, H. A., McGinley, J., . . . Brent, D.
Marshal, M. P., Friedman, M. S., Stall, R., King, K. M., Miles, J., Gold, M. A., . . . Morse, J. Q.
0443.2008.02149.x
Martin-Storey, A., & Crosnoe, R. (2012). Sexual minority status, peer harassment, and
doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.006
Martin-Storey, A., & Fish, J. (2019). Victimization disparities between heterosexual and sexual
doi:10.1111/cdev.13107
McConnell, E. A., Birkett, M. A., & Mustanski, B. (2015). Typologies of social support and
associations with mental health outcomes among LGBT youth. LGBT Health, 2(1), 55-
61. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2014.0051
McConnell, E. A., Birkett, M., & Mustanski, B. (2016). Families matter: Social support and
mental health trajectories among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Journal of
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 31
(1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual
674-697. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Mittleman, J. (2019). Sexual minority bullying and mental health from early childhood through
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.08.020
behavioral, and sexual health. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,
Mustanski, B., Newcomb, M., & Garofalo, R. (2011). Mental health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual
Mustanski, B. S., Garofalo, R., & Emerson, E. M. (2010). Mental health disorders, psychological
distress, and suicidality in a diverse sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.178319
Needham, B. L. (2012). Sexual attraction and trajectories of mental health and substance use
during the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
Olsen, E. O., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Kann, L., & Milligan, C. N. (2017). Trends in school-related
Olson, K. R., Durwood, L., DeMeules, M., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2016). Mental health of
transgender children who are supported in their identities. Pediatrics, 137(3), e20153223.
doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3223
2909.133.2.328
Pachankis, J. E., Goldfried, M. R., & Ramrattan, M. E. (2008). Extension of the rejection
Page, M. J., Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. M. (2013). The role of religion and stress in sexual
identity and mental health among LGB youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence,
23(4). doi:10.1111/jora.12025
Perez-Brumer, A., Day, J. K., Russell, S. T., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2017). Prevalence and
doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.010
Peterson, C. M., Matthews, A., Copps‐Smith, E., & Conard, L. A. (2017). Suicidality, self‐harm,
and body dissatisfaction in transgender adolescents and emerging adults with gender
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 33
doi:10.1111/sltb.12289
Pew Research Center (2017). The Partisan Divide on Political Values Grows Even Wider.
political-values-grows-even-wider/
Phillips, G., 2nd, Turner, B., Salamanca, P., Birkett, M., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Newcomb, M. E.,
sexual minority subgroups and sexual majority youth using the 2015 National Youth Risk
doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.040
Poteat, V. P., Sinclair, K. O., DiGiovanni, C. D., Koenig, B. W., & Russell, S. T. (2013). Gay-
doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00832.x
Quinn, D. M., & Chaudoir, S. R. (2009). Living with a concealable stigmatized identity: The
distress and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 634-651.
doi:10.1037/a0015815
Reisner, S. L., Greytak, E. A., Parsons, J. T., & Ybarra, M. L. (2015). Gender minority social
Robinson, J. P., Espelage, D. L., & Rivers, I. (2013). Developmental trends in peer victimization
and emotional distress in LGB and heterosexual youth. Pediatrics, 131(3), 423-430.
doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2595
Russell, S. T., Pollitt, A. M., Li, G., & Grossman, A. H. (2018). Chosen name use is linked to
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.02.003
Ryan, C., Huebner, D., Diaz, R. M., & Sanchez, J. (2009). Family rejection as a predictor of
negative health outcomes in white and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults.
B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and
clinical applications (pp. 176-205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Shilo, G., & Savaya, R. (2012). Mental health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth and young
adults: Differential effects of age, gender, religiosity, and sexual orientation. Journal of
Smith, T. W., Son, J., Kim, J. (2014). Public attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights
across time and countries. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.
Sterzing, P. R., Ratliff, G. A., Gartner, R. E., McGeough, B. L., & Johnson, K. C. (2017). Social
genderqueer, and cisgender sexual minority adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 1-
12. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.017
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 35
Stewart, J. L., Spivey, L. A., Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2019).
doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.006
Taliaferro, L. A., Gloppen, K. M., Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Eisenberg, M. E. (2017). Depression
Thoma, B. C., & Huebner, D. M. (2013). Health consequences of racist and antigay
discrimination for multiple minority adolescents. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority
Thoma, B. C., Salk, R. H., Choukas-Bradley, S., Levine, M. D., Goldstein, T. R., & Marshal, M.
Toomey, R. B., Ryan, C., Diaz, R. M., Card, N. A., & Russell, S. T. (2010). Gender-
nonconforming lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: School victimization and
doi:10.1037/a0020705
Toomey, R. B., Syvertsen, A. K., & Shramko, M. (2018). Transgender adolescent suicide
Veale, J. F., Peter, T., Travers, R., & Saewyc, E. M. (2017). Enacted stigma, mental health, and
protective factors among transgender youth in Canada. Transgender Health, 2(1), 207-
216. doi:10.1089/trgh.2017.0031
LGBT YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH 36
Veale, J. F., Watson, R. J., Peter, T., & Saewyc, E. M. (2017). Mental health disparities among
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.014
Velez, B. L., Moradi, B., & Deblaere, C. (2015). Multiple oppressions and the mental health of
doi:10.1177/0011000014542836
Wong, W. I., van der Miesen, A. I. R., Li, T. G. F., MacMullin, L. N., & VanderLaan, D. P.
doi:10.1037/cpp0000295
Zaza, S., Kann, L., & Barrios, L. C. (2016). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents: Population
doi:10.1001/jama.2016.11683
Zucker, K. J. (2017). Epidemiology of gender dysphoria and transgender identity. Sexual Health,