Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2011
Japanese Geotechnical Society
ABSTRACT
Attempts have been made in the past few decades to establish an equivalent void ratio indicative of the eŠective den-
sity state of sands that contain ˆnes. The concept of an equivalent void ratio is most useful when the grain size distribu-
tion of the sand/silt mixture is similar to that of binary packing. Due to its grain characteristics and the wide range of
compressibility when the ˆnes content changes, correlating the cyclic strength to ˆnes content via the equivalent void
ratio for Mai Liao Sand (MLS) is not a straightforward procedure. Earlier studies have demonstrated the eŠectiveness
of relating cyclic strength to state parameters for sands. Using a series of cyclic triaxial test results as a database, the
authors demonstrated the eŠectiveness of relating cyclic strength to ˆnes contents ( fc) through a state parameter for
MLS with an fc ranging from 0 to 30z that takes advantage of the equivalent void ratio. In addition to the density and
stress states, the state parameter based correlations indirectly re‰ect the eŠects of soil grain characteristics. The draw-
back of requiring a separate critical state line when fc changes can be circumvented by using a uniˆed critical state line
based on the equivalent void ratio.
Key words: cyclic strength, sand, ˆnes, state parameter, void ratio (IGC: D7)
INTRODUCTION
Studies on the eŠects of ˆnes (soil particles passing
#200 sieve) on the cyclic behavior of granular soils have
included a wide spectrum of gradations that span from
clean sand, silty sand, clayey sand, sandy silt to pure silt.
The uniˆed soil classiˆcation of these soils can vary from
poorly graded sand (SP), well graded sand to silty sand
(SW-SM), silty sand (SM), silty sand to clayey sand (SM-
SC) to low plastic silt (ML), depending on the amount
and characteristics of the ˆnes. The term silt/sand (M/S)
is proposed to serve as an abbreviated term to describe
granular soils with various contents of nonplastic and
plastic ˆnes with a wide range of gradations, inclusively.
Been and JeŠeries (1985) proposed the state parameter
C as a semi-empirical normalizing parameter for sand be-
havior. The state parameter C deˆnes the void ratio (e)
and eŠective mean normal stress ( p?) level of a sand rela-
tive to a reference state (the steady state) as shown in Fig. Fig. 1. Deˆnition of a state parameter (after Been et al., 1991)
1. The steady state of deformation for any mass of parti-
cles is that state in which the mass is continuously
deforming at constant volume, constant eŠective mean where
normal stress, constant shear stress, and constant velocity s?v and s?h=eŠective vertical and horizontal stress, respec-
(Poulos, 1981). The eŠective mean normal stress, p? tively.
shown in Fig. 1 is deˆned as The steady state line is the locus of steady state points
(s?v+2s?h) in the void ratio/stress space. The projection of the
p?= (1) steady state line (SSL) on the e-p? plane is used for data
3 presentation and the deˆnition of the state parameter C
i)
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan (abhuang@mail.nctu.edu.tw).
ii)
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan (dustintrain@gmail.com).
The manuscript for this paper was received for review on November 23, 2010; approved on June 8, 2011.
Written discussions on this paper should be submitted before July 1, 2012 to the Japanese Geotechnical Society, 4-38-2, Sengoku, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo 112-0011, Japan. Upon request the closing date may be extended one month.
991
Fig. 6. Isotropic consolidation curves and critical state lines for MLS with various ˆnes contents (after Huang et al., 2004)
FC=0 to 30z, and Ms=1.21 as FC reached 50z. These mean normal stress after the unloading stage, just prior
Ms (=6 sin q?s/(3-sin q?s)) values most likely correspond to the cyclic triaxial tests. For MT specimens, p? varied
to the interparticle friction angles (q?s) of 30.99and 30.29, from 80 to 200 kPa. Collectively, the cyclic triaxial test
respectively. The similarity in q?s regardless of the ˆnes series made it possible to consider the eŠects of density
content, indicates that the coarse and ˆne MLS particles state, stress state, stress history and soil fabric.
had similar grain to grain frictional behavior. The cyclic strength in terms of the cyclic resistance ra-
Table 1 compiles all of the related cyclic triaxial tests tio (CRR) was measured using stress controlled cyclic
performed in the past few years on MLS specimens. triaxial tests. The soil specimen was consolidated under
These tests provided a database to evaluate the relation- an isotropic eŠective conˆning stress s?c and then subject-
ships among e, e*, cyclic strength and the state parameter ed to a cyclic deviator stress, sd in the axial direction.
(C ). In the series of cyclic triaxial tests on specimens pre- Three to ˆve cyclic triaxial tests were performed with
pared by the water sedimentation (WS) method, all speci- various sd/2s?c values. The CRR was deˆned as the sd/
mens were consolidated and sheared under a p? of 100 2s?c that produced an axial strain of 5z in double ampli-
kPa. In cyclic triaxial tests on dry deposition (DD) speci- tude in 20 cycles (Nc) of uniform load application. Figure
mens, p? values of 50, 100 and 200 kPa were used. The 8 depicts the CRR versus Nc from selective cyclic triaxial
advantage of the moist tamping (MT) method is that it tests on MLS with fc of 0, 15 and 30z performed under
creates specimens with a wide range of densities, which is s?c=100 kPa. The specimens used in this series of cyclic
why it has been used extensively in cyclic triaxial tests. In triaxial tests were fabricated using the moist tamping
this series of tests, specimens with an over consolidation (MT) method. According to Fig. 8, the CRR consistently
ratio (OCR) of 4 were used. For over consolidated speci- decreased as the ˆnes contents changed from 0 to 15 and
mens, the p? values shown in Table 1 are the eŠective 30z for tests conducted under similar void ratios in the
996 HUANG AND CHUANG
SPM +
f c (z ) OCR p? (kPa) CRR e C e*
range of 0.7 and 0.8. Note that possible range of void ra-
tios under various ˆnes contents is wide, as shown in Fig.
6, due to diŠerences in compressibilities. Void ratios of
approximately 0.82 (close to the maximum applicable e
for specimens with FC=30z) and 0.71 (close to the mini-
Fig. 7c. EŠective stress paths from triaxial tests (after Huang et al., mum applicable e for specimens with FC=0z) represent
2004) the maximum and minimum void ratio, respectively, that
CYCLIC STRENGTH WITH FINES CONTENTS 997
Fig. 10. Relationship between cyclic strength and (a) void ratio, e; (b) Fig. 11. Relationship between cyclic strength and (a) void ratio, e; (b)
equivalent granular void ratio, e* for specimens prepared by DD equivalent granular void ratio, e* for specimens prepared by MT
method method
be expected since granular soil is less dilatant under sumed when using Eq. (3) due to a lack of clear trough in
higher conˆning stress. the emin-fc correlation for MLS. Other factors such as its
The use of e* to represent density state shifts all data platy grain shape and high compressibility mean that
close to a more uniˆed e*-CRR correlation among three MLS behaves signiˆcantly diŠerently from typical spheri-
types of ˆnes contents, as shown in Figs. 9(b), 10(b) and cal binary packing. Under these circumstances, it was de-
11(b). The results indicate that there appears to be an cided to adjust b empirically to enhance the e*-CRR cor-
over adjustment from e to e* when fc=15z, regardless relation. This is similar to the approach used by Ni et al.
of the specimen preparation method. The ˆnes may play (2004). The b value obtained from Eq. (3) was used as an
a much more active role (b value needs to be larger) than initial trial value. Following an iterative procedure, it was
predicted in Eq. (3) in the force structure of the MLS determined that a revised b value of 0.65 (b remains to be
specimens at fc=15z. If the e* values were computed us- 0.577 for fc=30z) for the case of fc=15z would result
ing Eq. (2) according to the b parameter (=0.164) from in a much improved e*-CRR correlation for specimens
Eq. (3), the e*-CRR data of fc=15z would deviate sig- within each group of preparation method. As shown in
niˆcantly away from a linear e*-CRR correlation estab- Figs. 9(b), 10(b) and 11(b), using the revised b value, the
lished from the remainder of the e*-CRR data within e*-CRR data ˆts a linear regression with coe‹cients of
each group of the specimen preparation method. The e*- correlations (R2) better than 0.734. The same linear
CRR data would have a coe‹cient of correlation less regression covers the range of stress conditions applied
than 0.4 with a linear regression, unless the data of fc= for each group of specimen preparation method. Less
15z are excluded. As stated above, fthre had to be as- scattering can be expected if all tests of the same specimen
CYCLIC STRENGTH WITH FINES CONTENTS 999
preparation method were conducted under the same con- equivalent granular void ratio on the other hand, con-
ˆning stress. For the MT specimens, a separate linear siders the density state only. The use of the state
regression can be made for the normally (OCR=1) and parameter does not require a gradation similar to that of
over consolidated (OCR=4) specimens. binary packing. For the case of MLS, the state parameter
It is evident that for MLS and at least for fc between 15 (C ) in Table 1 was determined following the procedure
and 30z, b is close to a constant as suggested by Ni et al. shown in Fig. 1. Similar trends between CRR and C can
(2004). The ˆnes play a much more signiˆcant role in the be identiˆed for MLS from data of the same specimen
sand-ˆnes force structure than predicted by Eq. (3) in the preparation group, as shown in Fig. 13. Only the data
case of fc=15z. This relatively high and constant b value from normally consolidated MT specimens are included
is believed to be a re‰ection of the mild diŠerences in in Fig. 13. The test data generally have coe‹cients of cor-
grain size (x=1.82) and mineral contents between sand relations in excess of 0.75 with their corresponding ex-
and ˆnes in MLS. For fc between 15 and 30z, a ˆrst ord- ponential curve ˆts. The state parameters of MLS extend
er estimation of b can be made by linear interpolation. into the positive side (CÀ0) much more so than those of
For practical purposes, a constant b value selected be- the clean quartz sands reported by JeŠeries and Been
tween 0.577 and 0.65 may also be assumed for fc in the (2006). This is a re‰ection of the compressive nature of
range of 15 and 30z, with a less desirable e*-CRR corre- MLS grains and the mostly contractive behavior during
lation. shear, as shown in Fig. 7. For data of the same specimen
preparation group, those with high ˆnes contents are
clustered further towards the positive side of the state
CORRELATING CRR WITH FINES CONTENT parameter axis. This is again a re‰ection of the higher
THROUGH THE STATE PARAMETER compressibility associated with M/S mixtures with higher
JeŠeries and Been (2006) showed that a clear trend be- ˆnes contents. For specimens with the same state
tween the state parameter (C) and CRR15 (cyclic strength parameter, the CRRs of MT specimens are the highest
determined at 15 cycles of loading) can be established as and those of the DD specimens are the lowest. This is
shown in Fig. 12, for clean quartz sands from diŠerent consistent with the earlier ˆndings reported by Huang et
parts of the world. The state parameter is soil fabric in- al. (2004) which indicated that for specimens with the
dependent. The cyclic strength, however, is soil fabric de- same void ratio, the CRRs from MT specimens are the
pendent. The eŠects of soil fabric are evident when speci- highest and those from DD specimens are the lowest.
mens prepared by diŠerent methods results in diŠerent Therefore, in addition to the consideration of the density
cyclic strength (Huang et al., 2004). The scatter of test state, the use of the state parameter has the additional ad-
data in Fig. 12 is believed to have been caused by varia- vantage of re‰ecting soil grain characteristics. These are
tions in soil fabrics originated in diŠerent specimen desirable features that the concept of equivalent granular
preparation methods involved in the data of Fig. 12 void ratio lacks.
(JeŠeries and Been, 2006). There are clear advantages to To use the state parameter derived from the void ratio,
extending the idea of correlating cyclic strength with state e has an important drawback. Ideally, a separate critical
parameter into sands with ˆnes. The strength, including state line is required for M/S mixtures with diŠerent ˆnes
the cyclic strength, is a function of density and the stress contents. For the tests on MLS reported herein, only
states which are both covered in state parameter. The three types of ˆnes contents are involved. The three criti-
cal state lines from each of the three types of ˆnes con-
Fig. 12. Correlation between cyclic strength and state parameter for Fig. 13. Correlation between cyclic strength and state parameter, C
clean quartz sands (after JeŠeries and Been, 2006) for MLS test data
1000 HUANG AND CHUANG
Fig. 14. The e based critical state loci and the critical state line derived Fig. 15. Correlation between cyclic strength and equivalent granular
using e* state parameter, C* for MLS test data
practicality of requiring a series of critical state lines for 8) Koester, J. P. (1994): The in‰uence of ˆnes type and content on cy-
each type of ˆnes contents involved can be circumvented clic strength, (eds. by Prakash, S. and Dakoulas, P.), Groun-
dfailures under seismic conditions, ASCE, Geotechnical Special
by invoking the equivalent granular void ratio in the de-
Publication 44, 17–33.
termination of state parameters. With properly calibrated 9) Lade, P. V., Liggio, C. D. and Yamamuro, J. A. (1998): EŠects of
b parameters or a function that determines b parameters, non-plastic ˆnes on minimum and maximum void ratios of sand,
a uniˆed e*-p? critical state line can be established for the Geotechnical Testing Journal, 21(4), 336–347.
range of ˆnes contents involved. For MLS and the tests 10) Ni, Q., Tan, T. S., Dasari, G. R. and Hight, D. W. (2004): Contri-
bution of ˆnes to the compressive strength of mixed soils, Geotech-
performed, the equivalent granular state parameter C *
nique, 54(9), 561–569.
can be an eŠective means to correlate cyclic strength with 11) Papadopoulou, A. and Tika, T. (2008): The eŠects of ˆnes on criti-
ˆnes contents. cal state and liquefaction resistance characteristics of non-plastic
silty sands, Soils and Foundations, 48(5), 713–725.
12) Polito, C. P. (1999): The eŠects of nonplastic and plastic ˆnes on
REFERENCES the liquefaction of sandy soils, Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
1) Been, K. and JeŠeries, M. G. (1985): A state parameter for sands, 13) Poulos, S. J. (1981): The steady state of deformation, Journal of
Geotechnique, 35(2), 99–112. Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 17(GT5), 553–562.
2) Been, K., JeŠeries, M. G. and Hachey, J. (1991): The critical state 14) Rahman, M. M., Lo, S. R. and Gnanendran, C. T. (2008): On
of sands, Geotechnique, 41(3), 365–381. equivalent granular void ratio and steady state behavior of loose
3) Huang, A. B., Hsu, H. H. and Chang, J. W. (1999): The behavior sand with ˆnes, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45, 1439–1456.
of a compressible silty ˆne sand, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 15) Thevanayagam, S. (2000): Liquefaction potential and undrained
36(1), 88–101. fragility of silty soils, Proceedings 12th World Conference on
4) Huang, Y. T, Huang, A. B., Kuo, Y. C. and Tsai, M. D. (2004): A Earthquake Engineering, Aukland, New Zealand, New Zealand So-
laboratory study on the undrained strength of a silty sand from ciety of Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, 2383.
Central Western Taiwan, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineer- 16) Thevanayagam, S., Kanagalingam, T. and Shenthan, T. (2002):
ing, 24(9)–(10), 733–743. Contact density—conˆning stress—energy to liquefaction relation,
5) Huang, A. B., Huang, Y. T. and Ho, F. J. (2005): Assessment of li- EM2002: Proceedings of the 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics
quefaction potential for a silty sand in Central Western Taiwan, Conference, New York, 87.
Proc. XVI ICSMGE, Osaka, 2653–2657. 17) Xenaki, V. C. and Athanasopoulos, G. A. (2003): Liquefaction
6) JeŠeries, M. G. and Been, K. (2006): Soil Liquefaction—A Critical resistance of sand-silt mixtures: an experimental investigation of
State Approach, Taylor and Francis, London, 479. the eŠect of ˆnes, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23,
7) Kikumoto, M., Muir Wood, D. and Russell, A. (2009): Particle 183–194.
crushing and deformation behavior, Soils and Foundations, 50(4),
547–563.