You are on page 1of 1

In the Classroom

There Seems To Be Uncertainty about the Use of Significant


Figures in Reporting Uncertainties of Results
Julio F. Caballero
Argentine Consultants in Education, P. O. Box 66321, Houston, TX 77266

Delphia F. Harris
Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of St. Thomas, Houston, TX 77006-4694

Error is inherently associated with any experimental tain some uncertainty. Common guidelines taught to under-
determination. It is clear that when a numerical result is graduates (1, 2) indicate that uncertainty should be reported
reported that the uncertainty should be estimated. A survey with one or two significant figures with a value between 3
of the literature indicates that chemists consistently provide and 30 whatever the place value.
estimates of uncertainties for reported results. Reports of uncertainties that exceed 30 appear regularly
There are circumstances under which considerable effort is in the literature. Table 1 illustrates just a few examples that
required to estimate uncertainties. Some computer programs were obtained by a very cursory review of recent issues of
that provide linear or curve-fitting routines to determine two journals. A number of them include uncertainties with
values also provide uncertainties associated with the computed three or more significant figures. These examples are taken
values. Computers, like calculators, fill the available places from both research and chemical education articles, and are
with digits unless programmed to round to a certain number of the reason for this note. Scientists who take such care in
digits. In whatever way uncertainties are estimated, another designing and carrying out complex experiments need to take
step is required before determining the final form of the more care in deciding on the appropriate form for reporting
reported result. The relative magnitude of the uncertainty their results. Faculty who teach students not to write down
compared with the result should dictate the number of sig- all the digits that their calculator generates should not report
nificant figures with which the result should be reported. In in a published article all the digits that a computer fit gener-
order to provide as much information as possible, the last ates. Referees and reviewers of manuscripts also need to give
digit of the result is assumed to contain error and may be careful attention to how results and their uncertainties are
largely uncertain (1, 2). The next to the last digit may con- reported.
Let’s practice what we teach.
Table 1. Examples of Inappropriate and Appropriate Literature Cited
Rounding
Uncer-- 1. Shoemaker, D. P.; Garland, C. W.; Nibler, J. W. Experiments in
Published Value Ref Appropriate Rounding Physical Chemistry, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1981; p 52.
taintya
2. Skoog, D. A.; West, D. M.; Holler, F. J. Fundamentals of Analytical
771 ± 135 3 (7.7 ± 1.4) × 102 14 Chemistry, 6th ed.; Sauders: New York, 1992; pp 31, 32.
65.9 ± 10.1 3 (6.6 ± 1.0) × 10 1
10 3. Wallington, T. J.; Ball, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 3201.
4. Wu, F.; Carr, R. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 3128.
e᎑ (646 ± 69) / T 4 e᎑(650 ± 70)/ T 7
5. Horowitz, A.; Crowley, J. N.; Moortgat, G. K. J. Phys. Chem.
1.79 ± 0.78 5 1.8 ± 0.8 8 1994, 98, 11924.
e(8450 ± 850)/ T 6 e (8400 ± 800)/ T b
8 6. As cited in ref 5, DeMore, W. B.; Sander, S. P.; Golden, D. M.;
Hampson, R. F.; Kurylo, M. J.; Howard, C. J.; Ravishankara, A.
(1.4488 ± 0.0290) × 10 ᎑46 7 (1.449 ± 0.029) × 10᎑46 29 R.; Kolb, C. E.; Molina, M. J. JPL Publication 92-20; Jet Pro-
᎑19.9998 SE 0.100842 8 ᎑20.00 SE 0.10 10 pulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,
aThiscolumn shows that each uncertainty has a value between 3 CA, 1992.
and 30, whatever the place value. 7. Mina-Camilde, N.; Manzanares, I. C.; Caballero, J. F. J. Chem.
bThis example illustrates laboratory rounding. When rounding involves Educ. 1996, 73, 804.
5 exactly, round to the even number. 8. David, C. W. J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 46.

996 Journal of Chemical Education • Vol. 75 No. 8 August 1998 • JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu

You might also like