@ANH NGU’ZIM @ 19002835 ‘yen sai LS cam ha CHU'ONG 3 BIEU DO DUONGANH NGO’ ZIM 4@ 13002833 ‘yen tS cm ba A.On tap Oa tye) cla mot div gi dé qua thoi gian 1, Ngon ngir mo td xu huréng (25) bangs: ic tir vying mé t& xu huréng thuréng ding. 4 durdong trong IELTS writing task 1 thurdg ding 4& chi su thay d6i (Ién, xuéng, thay di lién Trend Verb Noun (Xu hung tne) + increase increase + grow growth + goup ‘upward trend + climb (Xu hung gidm) + decrease decrease + decline decline + fall fall + drop drop downward trend (Xu huréng duy tn inh & mize nao 68) + remain/stay stable —— ‘© remain/stay unchanged + stabilize (Xu huténg dao d6ng) + fluctuate fluctuationANH NGO’ ZIM ‘yen tS cm ba «19002833 psn (2) Bang 2: Tir vung mé ta te d9/mite 9 cia sy thay di Meaning Adjectives Thay d6inhd © slight + marginal + moderate Thay d6i nhé qua thei» gradual ian * slow + steady Thay d6i én = considerable + significant ‘© substantial 2. Céu trite midu ta sy thay 48 2016. C6 thé report théng tin nay theo $ du trae sau: fu trie Cu trict Cu tric? Cau tric 3 Cau tric Cau tric 5 Ong Thire Subject + Verb + Adverb + Number+ Time period Theret bet a/an + Adjective + noun + number + in + “what” + complement+ Time period Subject + experienced/ saw/ witnessed + a/an + adj + noun + number+ time period ‘Alan + adj + noun + number + was seen/witnessed + in + subject + time period Time period (khoang thdi gian) + witnessed/saw/experienced + a/an + adj + noun + in + noun phrase Adverbs © slightly © marginally + moderately © gradually slowly + steadily © considerably significantly ‘© substantially Vi dy: 56 long hoc sinh 6 21M [6 1,500 vao nam 2015 va con s6 nay téing fen mite 2,000 vao ném viby The number of ZIM students increased significantly to 2,000 in 2016. There was a significant increase of 500 in the number of ZIM students in 2016 The number of ZIM students witnessed a significant increase of 500 in 2016. A significant increase of 500 was witnessed in the number of ZIM students 2016. The year 2016 witnessed a significant increase of $00 in the number of ZIM students. (D_ Ties cde miu cu hay ghép hai cdu don dé trénh lgp chi ng: &29 view @ANH NGU’ZIM Layer ens car bra 11900 2833, psn ‘The number of ZIM students decreased slightly to 1,500 in 2015. However, the number of ZIM students increased significantly by 500 in 2016. © Ching ta c6 thé viét la cau trén véi cdc mau cu sau Mau cau. Céng Thirc vidy Miu ciu1 SV, which was followed by There was a fll to 1,500 in the number of Zim students in 2015, which was followed by an inerease to 2,000 in 2016. Miu ciu2 SW, butlater +V ‘The number of ZIM students declined slightly to 1,500 in 2015, but later went up sharply by 500 in 2016. ‘Mau cau 3 ‘S+V before V-ing ‘The number of Zim students declined slightly to. 1,500 in 2015 before experiencing a sharp Increase of 500 in 2016.@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, ‘yen cmb sean hop vao ché tréng dé migu ta biéu 3 duréi dy Number of road accidents in Someland between 1983-1995 ns of accidents 9 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 ‘The number of road accidents began at over 4 million in 1983 and then (2)... Steadily to nearly 5 million in 1985. In the following year, the figure (2) at 6.5 million before (3). 35 million in 1987, There was (4) in the number of road accidents between 1987 and 1990, which was followed by (5). to a low of just under 3 million in 1991. The year 1992 (6). cases at the end of the period. . t0 3 million |. 2 recovery back to 4 million accidents, but the figure then (7).@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, ‘yen cmb sean ‘The graph below gives information about Dubai gold sales in 2002. ‘Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Dubai gold sales lions of Dirham 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 ©2005 ©2006 2007 2008 2009 2010@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, ‘yen cmb sean B. Huong dan cach lam dang Line Graph 1, Cach lam dang tir 3 duréng tré xuéng, Vidu: ‘The graph below shows consumers’ average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. Average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line services, 2001-2010 $800 $700 $600 $500 3400 $300 $200 $100 so 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2008-2007 2008 2009 ©2010 Call phone services National fixed-line services International fixed-line services > Burée 4; Phan tich a@ Y Dé; tugng (chi nga) cia biéu dB la gi? ‘BGI tong dura dua ra 6 day la sy chi tiéu hang nim (lung tien), "chil ngir & day la “The amount of money spent on cell phone services/ national fixed-line services/ international fixed-line services” Ho3c “Average yearly spending/expenditure on cell phone services/ national fixed-line services/ international fixed-line services” ¥ don vila gi? ‘Ban vi durge tinh bang $ - dollar C6 méc hay khodng thai gian khéng? Thi cia dong tir? kKhodng thai gian trong 9 nm bit du tir nm 2001. Vy nén ching ta sé ding thi “qué kh don” xuyén sudt 8 baiANH NGU’ ZIM «@ 19002833 Layer ens car bra psn vviét Introduction > Buéc 2: Paraphrase dé bi Subject Verb WHAT WHERE WHEN US consumers’ average annual expenditure on cell phone The services, national and between 2001 and Ce shows eee chart fixed-line 2010 the average amount of money over a period of 9 Viét The tne tlustrates SPent early on mobil phones, years starting from 1¢ line national and international — inthe y= 200 Iai chart landline phones from 2001 to 2010 © Introduction: The ¢ graph illustrates the average amount of money spent yearly on mobile phones, national and international landline phones in the US over a period of 9 years. > Bue 3: Kéc dinh ¥ va viet Overview (5 phat) ‘Tim 1-2 dac diém chung cia bidu 4B. Voi dang biéu 3 dudng (c6 xu hung), Overview duoc viet theo 2 sau # 8c diém ve xu hung: nhin tir dau nm dén cui nm xem xu huéng cha céc dudng la gl? La ting? glam? dao ding lién tuc? hay gitr nguyén? Dac diém v8 dé Ién: tim xem day nao nam cao hat, thip nhét, hogc thay di lin nhat ‘Ap dung vao ba, ta thay # Bac diém v8 xu hung: Mot éueng C6 xu hurdng tng (cell phone services), mot éudng c6 xu hudng, aim (national fixed-line services), mot dung gin nhur git nguyén trong cé giai doan (international fixed-line services) Dac diém v8 d6 én: Khéng cé dizong nio nim cao nhdt hodc thdp nhat trong sudt qué trinh, t &ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn nhién c6 thé thay durdng international fi-lined services & vi tri thdp nhat trong hu hét céc nm. = Tir2 dc diém trén, ta cé thé viét overview nhur sau: Nhin chung, trong khi chi tu hang nam Reape CSc) It is clear that while the yearly services) tang manh, digu nguege ll ding cho chi tiéu cia dién thoal c6 dinh spending on mobile phones increased significantly, the opposite Co edie Se) was true for national landline phone trong khoang thai gian nay. Ngoal ra, etn chi tiéu cho dign thogi o6 dinh quéc té eee eet (international fixedtline services) gan nhur khéng di vt & vi tri thap nha lowest during the period. trong hiau hét cdc nam. QD Vocabulary/Grammar notes: * Cum tir “Itis clear that” 1a mét cum rét phé bién dé sir dung mé dau cho phiin Overview cho tat cd cde bai task 1 khéng chi riéng biéu db duréng. * Cau tric “while S+V, $+V” ding dé so sénh gitta 2 xu huéng tréi nguee nhau (vi du 1 tdng, 1 giém) cha 2 nhdn t6 durgc mé té trong biéu 48, gidp bién céu thanh 1 céu phite. + Cum tir “the opposite was true for something (diéu ngurat loi thi ding cho...” cling Ia mét cum cb thé dp dung cho céc bai task 1 khdc, vira Gn diém tir vung vita trénh lp Igi chi ngit dé trinh bay true 46. + Cum tir “over the period” dugc thay thé cho cum “over a period of 9 years starting from 2001” dé trénh vig gp ti.@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, ‘yen cmb sean > Bude Lya chon, nhém théng tin va viét 2 doan Detal (10 phat) Véi dang duréi 3 durdmg, céch nhém théng tin hiéu qué 46 18 chia d6i quaing thoi gian cua biéu ad ri phan tich cho 2 doan detail, cy thé The graph below shows consumers’ average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. Average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line services, 2001-2010 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 so 2001 20022003 200420052006 -« 2007 «2008 «7009-2010 ell phone services —National fixed-line services — International fixed-line services, Y Detail 1: So sénh cic dung & diém dau, xu hong cho dén diém gitra (2001-2006) ‘+ Nam 2001: ta thay s6 tién ln nhét la chi cho national fixed-line services kho’ng $700, trong kh ‘con 6 d6 & international fixed-line services chi la $250 va cell phone services chi $200 (Iuu y: bat du Detail 1 thutsng la cau so sénh s6 ligu cde durdng & nam dau tien) ‘+ 5 nim tip theo: chi tiéu trung binh hang nam cla national fixed-line services giém di khong $200, ngudt lai chi tiéu cho cell phones tng thém khong $300. Chi tiGu cho International fixed- line services dao déng trong khoang duréi $300. © sea shiz sim 2002, 2003, 2004 56 igu khdng 6g! ni bt, nén chi Bn nb luGn xu huéng cho dn nam 2006. © Thé hign kha nang lia chon théng tin chinh, &ANH NGO’ ZIM Layer ens car bra 11900 2833, psn \Véi céch phan tich trén va dp dung céc cng thitc viét cdu, dogn detail 1 durge viét nhur sau: Trong nam 2001, trung binh gan 700 dé la My duge chi tiéu cho dign thoai <6 dinh trong nuréc, so véi chi khodng 200 6 la cho dién thoai di déng va dign thogi 6 dinh quéc 8. Trong nim ndm tig theo, sé tin trung binh dé vio dién thogi e6'dinh trong nue gidm di khoding $200. Ngurgc la, viée chi tiéw hang nam cho diign thogi di dong ching kién mét sy tang nhanh thém khodng 300 d6 la. ang tho’ diém dé, s6 ligu cho dién thogi 66 dinh quéc té dao ding & mite dé In 2001, there was an average of nearly $700 spent on national landline phones by US residents, in comparison with only around $200 each on mobile phones and international landline services. Over the next five years, the average amount poured into national fixed-line phones fell by approximately $200. By constrast, yearly spending on cell phones witnessed a. significant increase of roughly $300. At the same time, the figure for overseas landline services fluctuated slightly below $300. Y Detail 2: xu huréng ti diém gia dén diém cus so sénh diém cusi (ndm 2006 — hét) + 2006: s6 ligu cho national fixed-line va cell phone services bing nhau & mite $500. + Tir 2006-2010: cell phone services tigp tue ting va dat gn $750, trong khi national fixed-line services giim xuSng con kho’ng $400. Chi tidu cho international fixed-line services git nguyén trong giai doan nay. © tara ye Twone ty nhirng nim 2007, 2008, 2009 56 liu khong c6 gi nd bat, nén chi cBn n6i dn xu hung cho dén nim cusi cing, thuréing sé c6 so sénh & s6 ligu nam cudi cing.ANH NGO’ ZIM Layer ens car bra 11900 2833, psn Véi ch phan tich trén va dp dung cdc cng thie vit cdu, dogn detail durgc viét nhu sau Vaio nam 2006, trung binh 1 nguei MY danh mt lvgng tién tung durong cho ci dich vu din thogi c6 dinh trong nsec va di déng, 6 mite $500 cho méi log. Tir ndm 2006 tré di, c6 thé thdy ring chi tiéu trung binh nam cho dién thoai ai dong vrgt qua dign thogi ban c6 dinh dé tré thanh phurong tién lién lac phé bién rnht. Cy thé, chi tiu hang nam cho dich vu dign thoai di déng tip tuc tang cho En gin $750 & nam cuéi, trong khi sO ligu cho dign thogi ban trong née lal idm chi con khoding $400. Chi tiéu cho dich vu goi c6 dinh quée té khong asi trong giai doan nay. In 2006, US consumers spent the same amount of money on mobile and national fixedsine services, with just ‘over $500 on each. From the year 2006 ‘onwards, it can be seen that the average yearly expenditure on mobile phones surpassed that on national fixedline phones and mobile phones became the most common means of communication. To be specific, yearly spending on mobile phone services increased to nearly §750 in the last year, while the figure for national landline phone ones decreased to about §400 at the end of the period. During the same period, there was a stability in the figure for overseas phone calls.ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn Toan bé bai méu: The line graph illustrates the average amount of money spent yearly on mobile phones, national and international landline phones in the US over a period of 9 years. Itis clear that while the yearly spending on mobile phones increased significantly, the opposite was true for national landline phone expenditure. Also, the figure for international fixed-line service was lowest during the period. In 2001, there was an average of nearly $700 spent on national landline phones by US residents, in ‘comparison with only around $200 each on mobile phones and international landline services. Over the next five years, the average amount poured into national fixed-line phones fell by approximately $200, By constrast, yearly spending on cell phones witnessed a significant increase of roughly $300. At the ‘same time, the figure for overseas landline services fluctuated slightly below $300. In 2006, US consumers spent the same amount of money on mobile and national fixed-line services, with just over $500 on each. From the year 2006 onwards, it can be seen that the average yearly ‘expenditure on mobile phones surpassed that on national fixed-line phones and mobile phones became the most common means of communication. To be specific, yearly spending on mobile phone services, increased to nearly $750 in the last year, while the figure for national landline phone ones decreased to about $400 at the end of the period. During the same period, there was a stability in the figure for overseas phone calls.@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn LUYEN TAP DANG 3 DUONG 7 Svercia The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, Russia and America between 2000 and 2015, i = P —hassa 3 —America E> ‘ 5 1 ° 2000 2008 2010 2015 Y Béi tugng (chi ngQ) etia biéu a la gi? Nhin vao d8 bai, ta cé thé thdy d6i tugng dutgc dura ra & day s6 lvgng hoc sinh Vit Nam hoc tép 6 3 nuée Y Bon vila gi? Bon vi trigu ngudi C6 méc hay khodng thé’ gian khéng? Thi ciia d6ng tir? khong thai gian trong 15 nam bat dau tir nam 2000. Vay nén ching ta sé ding thi “qua khit den” xuyén suét cd bai@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn > Buéec 2: Paraphrase d bai - viét Introduction The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, Ru: ‘America between 2000 and 2015. ia and = Introduction: > Bue 3: Xa dinh ¥ va vist Overview —France —armerica ‘Number of students ( 2000 2008 2010 2015 # ac diém ve xu hung: (nhin vao diém du-diém cudi cia timng durdmg): S6 lurong hoc sinh VN hoc & Mj va Phap tng, trong khi s6 lone di hoc & Nga gidm. ‘* Dic diém v8 d6 Ién: 56 lugng hoc sinh di hoc & My tng manh nhat. > Overview Itis clear that.ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn > Bue 4: Lya chon, nhém théng tin va viét 2 doan Detail (10 phat) Y Detail 1: 50 sénh cdc line & diém dau, xu huréng cho dén diém gi Phan tich * Nim 2000: $6 hoc sinh Viet di hoc & Phap la cao nh, hon 3.5 million, so véi 3 million & Nga va 1.5 million & Mf. * 2000-2005: $6 hoc sinh di Php va Nga giém di khong 1 million, ngugt lai di My tang lén hon 2 DetailANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn Y Detail 2: xu huréng tir diém gitra dén diém cusi, so sinh diém cusi (ndim 2005 - hét) + SBhoe sinh di My ting man, dat 5 milion vao nim 2025, + Newae lai $6 wong di Phap gidm xubng hon 2 million sau 1 thd gian khong di + SB wong di Nga gidm xuéng mtéc thdp nhét dui 2 million vao 2010 nhung ting dn én 2.5 million vvao cud giai doan Detail 2@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn The graph below gives information about household car ownership In Britain from 1971 to 2007. Household car ownership in Britain 60% 50% 40% —noear 30% ——One car s0% two oF more cars 10%, o% 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 > — Buéc 1: Phan tich biéu dd: YG; twong (chi nga) cia biéu dB la gi? % don vila gi? ¥ C6 méc hay khoding ther gian khéng? Thi ca déng tur?ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn > Buse 2: Introduction: Paraphrase a bai > Bu6e 3: Vist overview: Y Die diém v8 xu huéng: YY Dic diém vé a6 lon: > Bue 4; Nhém théng tin vao 2 dogn Detail Y Detail 1:@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn Toan bo bai viét:ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, ‘yen cmb hein 2. Cch lam dang nhiéu hon 3 duéng: (QD Vei dang co nhieu hon 3 dueng (thudng Id 4-5 dude), viéc viét introduction va overview hoan toan twong ty, chi khéc & céch chia thdng tin viét & 2 detail kh6ng nén chia theo thoi gian nize ma nén chia theo céc dung, cu thé nh sau: v Detail + Miu td va so sanh 2-3 duzong (thurdng chon duréng c cing xu huéng tang/giam hode cng c6 gid tr Kén/nho). Y Detail 2: Miu ta va so sénh cde dung cn la vidy: The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 Percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited different attractions Aquarium —asstle Z00 Festival 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 > Bude 1: Phantich &® Y Béi tugng (chi ngi) cia biéu dB la gi? ‘B61 tung dure dura ra 6 day la phiin trdm khch du lich dén Scotland ¥ donvilagi? ‘Ban vi durgc tinh bang %. C6 méc hay khoding thoi gian khéng? Thi cia dng tir? Khong thes gian trong 30 nam bat d&u tir nim 1980. Vay nén ching ta s® ding thi “qua khir don” xuyén sudt cd bal> Buse 2: Paraphrase d8 bi ANH NGO’ ZIM eB 19002833 ‘yen tS cm ba psn = viét Introduction TTT waar WHERE Wien The line the percentage of tourists to Scotland who sae OS howe from 1980 to 2010 grap Visited four different attractions over a period of 30 the tine tlustrates the percentage of visitors to four places in vieeige yard hart Scotland including Aquarium, Castle, Zoo and cha between 1980 and Festival 2010 © Introduction: The line chart illustrates the percentage of visitors to four places in Scotland including Aquarium, Castle, Zoo and Festival over a period of 30 years. > Buse 3: Xdc dinh y va viét Overview Tuong ty phan trude (loai 3 duéng tré xudng), Overview durgc viét dy trén 2 dc diém sau © Dac digm vé xu huéng: Hai duréng cé xu hung tang (Castle & Zoo), Hai dung cé xu hyéng gidm (Festival & Aquarium) # Dac diém v8 d6 In: Dung Castle cao nhit cho phiin lén qué trinh (tuong ty, dung Zoo thdp nhst cho phiin lén qué trinh) © Overview: Its clear that while the percentage of tourists visiting Castle and Zoo increased, the opposite was true for Aquarium and Festival over the period. It is also notable that Castle was the most popular tourist attraction in Scotland for most of the period.ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn Vocabulary/Grammar notes: Nhu di thd, cde cau tric quen thude vin durge sir dung: Céu tric while $ + V, $+ V, cum tir It is clear that, its also notable that, the opposite was true for va over the period. Cum “for most of the period” cé ngha la cho phan In quding thet gian cil biéu dé (>80%). Khi néi v8 dung coo nha, céu tric so stinh hon nhit sé duoc sir dung: subject + be + the + Adj & dang so sénh nhét + noun. Vd trong bai I "Castle was the most popular tourist attraction”.ANH NGO’ ZIM Layer ens car bra 11900 2833, psn > Bute 4: Lya chon, nhém théng tin va viét 2 doan Detail 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1980 1985 1990 1995 Percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited different attractions 2005 2010 —Aauarium —aastle —t0 —Festival Y Detail 1: Nhém Miu t8 Castle va Zoo (ciing ¢6 xu huréng tang). ‘= 1980: Lurgng khiich dén thm Castle (nearly 25%, trong khi Zoo (~10%) * Ty nam 1980-2000: Lugng khach dn thm Castle tang manh dé dat dinh khong 45% ndm 1995 trurée khi gidm xung cdn 35% v3o ndm 2000. Tuy nhién, lugng khéch dén Zoo chi dao dong. quanh 10-15%. = _Nhding nm con lai: Trong khi wong khach dén Castle tiép tue gi8m nhe (xuding 33%), lang khach én 200 tang (20%). Tir vige phan tich trén, dogn Detail 1 dure viét nhur sau: Vaio nam 1980, gan 25% khéch du lich da dén tham Castle, cao hon rat nhiéu so voi lreng khach ciia Z00 chi 6 10%. Trong 20 nam tip theo, t7 Ie du khdch cia Castle tang len dang ké d8 dat mite dinh cao vao khoang 45% vio nim 1995, theo sau béi sw glim dang ké xudng chi cdn hom 30% trong nim 2010. Ngwoe lai, mac dis c& mét vai bién dong nh8 trong khoding 10-15% trong suét 20 nim dau tho’ ki, s6 liu cho Zoo sau dé tang len dng ké dén 20% trong nam cust. In 1980, the percentage of tourists who chose to visit Castle was nearly 25%, which was significantly higher than the figure for 200, at only 10%, Over the following 20 years, the percentage of Castle visitors increased dramatically to reach a peak of about 45% in 1995, followed by a considerable drop to just over 30% in 2010. By contrast, despite some minor fluctuations around 10 to 15% during the first 20 years, the figure for Zoo then significantly increased to 20% in the last year.ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn Y “Detail 2: Nhém cdn lai Aquarium va Festival (cing c6 xu huréng gidm) #1980: Lutgng khéch dn thm Festival lm nhat (30%), trong khi Aquarium (~20%) * Aquarium: Bat dinh khodng 35% trutéc khi gidm vé s6 ligu ban du => sau dé tip tuc gidm manh using dui 10% vio nam cud ‘Festival: Gidm din trong c& qua trinh xuGng con dudi 20% vio nm cudi Tir vige phén tich trén, dogn Detail 2 duc viét nhu sau: - Looking at the other attractions, Festival hin vao cde dim tham quan khéc, Festival 18 nai hdp din nhdt & Scotland vio nim 1980 v6i 30% khch du lich & Scotland, so v6i 20% d6I_véi Aquarium. Trong khodng tha gian 30 nam, ty Ié Khdch du lich tham ‘was the most attractive place in Scotland in 1980 with 30% of Scotland tourists choosing this, compared to 20% for Aquarium. Over the next 5 years, the percentage of travellers paying a visit to Aquarium quan Aquarium tang manh mé dé dat din | reached a peak of nearly 35% in 1985 before an 35% vio ndm 1985 trurdic khi gidm ve 56 ligu ban dau dau 5 nam sau dé. Ké tie 6, con 6 nay tip tye gdm xuéng dang ké decreasing back to 20% five years later. Since then, this figure continued to fall significantly to just under 10% in 2010. xudhng dur6i 10% trong nim 2010. Trong khi 46, Festival da tréi qua mét sy giém dan trong suét thar kj, két thtic vo khong 20% Meanwhile, the percentage of Festival visitors experienced @ gradual decrease throughout the period, ending at roughlyANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn Toan bo The line chart illustrates the percentage of visitors to four places in Scotland including Aquarium, Castle, Zoo and Festival over a period of 30 years. It is clear that while the percentage of tourists visiting Castle and Zoo increased, the opposite was true for Aquarium and Festival over the period. It is also notable that Castle was the most popular tourist attraction in Scotland for most of the period, tn 1980, the percentage of tourists who chose to visit Castle was nearly 25%, which was significantly higher than the figure for 200, a only 10%. Over the following 20 years, the percentage of Castle visitors increased dramatically to reach a peak of about 45% in 1995, followed by a considerable drop to just ‘over 30% in 2010. By contrast, despite some minor fluctuations around 10 to 15% during the first 20 years, the figure for Zoo then significantly increased to 20% in the last year. Looking at the other attractions, Festival was the most attractive place in Scotland in 1980 with 30% of Scotland tourists choosing this, compared with 20% for Aquarium. Over the next 5 years, the percentage of travellers paying a visit to Aquarium reached a peak of nearly 35% in 1985 before decreasing back to 20% five years later. Since then, this figure continued to fall significantly to just under 10% in 2020. Meanwhile, the percentage of Festival visitors experienced a gradual decrease throughout the period, ‘ending at roughly 25% at the end of the period,ANH NGO’ ZIM eB 19002833 Layer ens car bra psn Q_TPS mot sé edu tre vigt edu nang cao Céng Thite vipy Before/After + V-ing, $+V + adv Eg: After declining dramatically from 2001 to 2006, the expenditure con cell phone services steadily increased. There was a/an + adj + Ni, Eg: There was a downward fluctuation in the amount of acid rain, followed by + a/an+adj2+N2 followed by a steady decline, Starting at + sé ligu + nam, $+ Eg: Starting at 100 students in 2015, the number of ZIM students Veadv increased significantly to reach a peak of 400 students in 2016. S+V+ady, Ving, and thenV Eg: The number of households who did not use cars strongly decreased from 90 to 20 million, hitting the bottom in 2010, but ‘then slightly increased to 15 million during the last year.@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn LuyéN TAP OF tues The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012 Electricity production in France by source (TW-h) 500 450 400 350 300 Thermal 250 Nuclear 200 Hydroelectric 350 —renewabies 100 so Da 1980 198519901995 200020052010 > Burée 1: Phan tich a Bi tung (chi nga) cia biéu dB la gi? Nhin vao d& bai, ta cé thé thay di tuong duge dura ra & day [a sin lugng dién duge sin xudt boi 4 ngudn khéc nhau, ¥ on vila gi? ‘ban vi dug tinh bing terrawatt hours (TWh) ¥ C6 méc hay khoding thé gian khéng? Thi cita déng tir? khoang ther gian trong 32 nam bat dau tir nm 1980. Vay nén ching ta sé ding thi “qua khir don” xuyén suét cd bai> Bude 2: Pa @ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, ‘yen cmb sean aphrase d® bai - viét Introduction ‘The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012. "> Introduction: > Burge 3: Xdc dinh y va viét Overview 500 300 200 100 Electricity production in France by source (Tw-h) Thermal Nuclear Hydroelectric Renewables Ee 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Bac diém vB huéng gidm ( * Bic diém ve xu huréng: Hai dung cé xu huéng tang (Nuclear & Renewables}, Hai dudng cé xu Hydro & Thermal) 66 l6n: Bung Nuclear cao nhit cho phn lén qué trinh (tong ty, dvéng Renewables ‘hap nhat cho phn Ién qua trinh) > Overview Itis clear that.. > Bude a: Lye ‘chan, nhém théng tin va viét 2 dogn Detail @ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn Y Detail 1: Viét Nuclear va Renewables (cling cé xu huréng tng) ‘* 1980: Nuclear tgo ra 70 tw-h, trong khi Renewables rt bé khéng ding ké (negligible amount) = 1980-2012: ‘© Nuclear: Luong dign dure tao boi nguyén ligu nay tng manh dé dat dinh vao nam 2005 (~430 tw-h), true khi gidm nhe xudng han 400 tw-h vao nim cusi ‘© Renewables: Git virng xu huéng khéng d6i cho t6i nim 1995, truée khi tng nhe dén xdp xi 25 Tweh vao nim 2012 Detail 1@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn Y Detail 2: 2 dureng con ‘* 1980: Thermal tao ra nhidu dign nhat (~120tw-h), trong khi hydro [8 70 tw-h. © Xu huéng: Ca 2 dBu ching kién xu huréng dao ding nhe trong cB qué trinh, true khi két thc & xung quanh 50 tw Detail 2@ANH NGU’ZIM Layer ens car bra GP brcses ‘The graph below gives information about U.S government spending on research 11900 2833, psn between 1980 and 2008. US government research expenditure ($ billion) 2 Exo 3 —Health Bas 2 other B —space 10 3 very 2 cea canes Bs ° 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2008 2008 & Bude 1: Phan tich biéu do: Y B6itwgng (chi ngd) cia biéu A la gi? Y don vjlagi? C6 mée hay khoding thé’ gian khdng? Thi cia dong tir?ANH NGO’ ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn > Buée 2: Introduction: Paraphrase a b > Buée 3: Viet overview: Yi diém vé xu huréng: Dic diém vé 46 lon: > Burge 4; Nhém théng tin vao 2 dogn Detail Detail 1: ¥ Detail 2:@ANH NGU’ZIM 1900 2833, Layer ens car bra psn ‘Toan bé bai viet: