ee "2018 (wavy
Name of the Paper: UNE)
+ Auditin;
8 & Cor
Name of the Course B.Co: porate Govern:
Semester or (Hons.) CBcs one
‘Duration : 3 hours
Maximum Marks: 75
Attempt AMI questi
n questions,
All questions carry equal marks
efine auditing. Explain bri les of
9.1. (a) Define iB: riefly the princi; auditiny 8
va plain bri principl iting.
(b) Discuss the civil and criminal liabilities of See ;
ee : ler Companies
ns. (a) Auditing and its principles. See Q. 1, Uni Pag
Be a ng and its principles. , Unit 1
(civil and Criminal liabilities of Auditors i Bes
uditors. See Q. 30, Unit 1, [Pages 32-33
ig) What is the auditor's duty wi i
ee Peete ror of your ieee ‘ ith regard to detection of frauds? Cite legal
) An auditor's report may be unqualifie ifi ae
De GNEReror ge pauks ec O'uroit) Oatl teaged
‘Auditor's duty with regard to detection of frauds: The auditor's coven
regards to detection and prevention of frauds has been largely laid down by
various legal decisions and:professional pronouncements, ‘ ;
(The judgement in ‘Kingston Cotton Mills Co. comparing the auditor to
a/watch-dog’ and not.a’blood-hound’ does not absolve the auditor of his
responsibility to conduct a careful checking of business transactions. In
fact his responsibility in this regard also extends to areas in which he hhas
wo adequate competence, such as valuation of assets or legal mater
the case of which he may take the assistance of experts who will be
regarded as his agents for the purpose.
(ii) The decision given in ‘Westminster Road Construction and Engineering
Co! case emphasised adoption of audit procedure confirm the facts
stated through management transactions. Thus, ‘widens the scope of an
auditor's duty with regards to frauds and errors and lays down more
strict standards of reasonable care,
(iii) The judgement in ‘Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. vs. Heller and Partners Ltd.
(Go! reco pnised for the first fime the Tiability of professionals including
Pages, company auditors towards third parties. i
y [re (i0) More recently similar decision "Caparo’s 1990 Case! has also upheld
age the principle of auditor's duty Towards third parties for detection and
y aude and errors in case of ReBliEeneS:
=r prevention of frauds Pr ids AAS-4 (SA 240) ‘Fraud ane Error issued
sy Auditing and Assurant :
| by the Institute of Chartered Accountants ot India makes the following points
| as to the auditor's responsibility for detection of material) mis-statement in the
ere fe eem nie cue to.fraudiand ot
(i Prevention and detection of fraud ani
Management.
error is the responsibility of the
145
SeCORPORATE GOVERNANCE 2018 (MAY-JUNE)
147
sade by the whistleblower should be han
.. Many, large-scale corporations’ frauds ha eee
whi leblowing. It is imperative for every eae a ent
Mmprenensive whistleblowing policy in pee hey
continuous trust and support from all parents Pee
sides there has been development of Corporate Soci
ea\asumer activism and sustainable working life h oes
{0 focus more on ethical issues. Therefore, whistleblo od
snd justified in order to preserve organisation and publi eee
chan Ngee of sistleloving that may accrue are a ol neues
ad share confidence from all stakeholders, aes
: ‘of organisation to certain type of ri i
Pr i type of risks such as malpractices,
4s interests of stakeholders.
‘effective fulfillment of Corporate Social Responsibility.
ts legal action against the organisation. :
snisations want to be seen as responsible parts of society and t!
‘bited in the mission, goals, strategies el reports of a a
Joyalty of whistleblower is to report ‘behaviour that departs from the
ion of the organisation. The employee is seen to be loyal to the
ission and goals and not to hierarchy or positions.
older Activism. See Q. 36, Unit II.
Or
riefly explain the corporate governance reforms in Indi. 8
it are the different benefits of adopting ethics in business? W
“The initiatives for Corporate Governance Reforms in India have come
the Government at macro level to strengthen the industrial capabilities
firms and the companies themselves at the micro Jevel to compete
ith their foreign counterparts. A
evolved a wide range of jnstitutional and corporate initiatives in
governance reforms which includes greater transparency, higher
of information disclosures, reforming company board structure and
al system and reforming governance mechanism of financial institutions.
‘the Initiatives are: a :
41 Market Regulations. ‘The Securities and Exchange Board of India
g been responsible for a large proportion of initiatives aimed at
‘etter governance for Shareholders and in developing efficient capital
EE
EENEDE F
Zz
=
a
SEE.
[Page 81
SEBI in this respect have been the introduction
teria for public offers, declaration of
yesults, mandatory appointment of compliance officer,
fs, modernization of market microstructures and
tions for mergers and takeovers.
ais enacted in recent years include:
‘Trading Rules 1992);
lations 1993;
Regulations 1994;
Treasures instituted by SEY
mms, strict entry point crit
7 (Insider
+ SEBI (underwriters) Rept
1 Spl Bankers fo an Issue)reality and.
jottom line is that it
cial Stewardship Elkington’s 7
i , | coneor Of
selling some190(182) * SHIV DAS DELHI UNIVERSITY SERIES
The 2015 Regulations are applicable to any entity (whet
x g the stock exchange, for listing equity shares
institutional trading Platforms), debt securities of rd, §
as Preference, ME
Teceipts, securitized debt instruments, mutual fund uni = ates,
may be specified by SEBI. Mie, and othe,
sition of Board of Directors under LODR for listed
Board of Directors shall have an optimum combination of ey,
Monexecutive directors with at least one woman dices and
than fifty percent of the board of directors shall compra nonene ie
directors.
ther & compan
(0M main pa Oy
companies,
ided that the Board of directors of th
‘independent woman director by A
p 1000 listed entities shall have at least
2020
top 500 listed entitic
1, 2019 and the Bo,
One independent
8 shall ha
ard of direon
woman direc
Ve ay
ere the chairperson of the board of directors is a n
ector, at least one-third of the board of directors sh,
f independent directors and where the listed entity does
at non-executive chairperson, at least half of the boar
omprise of independent directors
ere the non-executive chairperson is a promoter of the listed en.
to any promoter or person occupying management positions
d of director or at one level below the Board of Directors, t
lirectors of the listed entity shall consist of Independent
ON-eXeCutive
all. comprise
8 not have »
dof directors
ectors of the top 1000 listed entities (with effect from
and the top 2000 listed entities (with effect from April,
e of not less than six directors.
ittees under Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI (LODR)
position of Audit Committee, Nomination and Rem-
eholder Relationship Committee, Corporate Social
d Risk Management Committee under Compariss
lations, 2015 with relevant Terms and Conditions
as members, a
Directors or Majority of the members sho"
ttee will be Independent Director,
members must have ability to read a
the Secretary to the Audit canis
shall invite the Finance dren
i al audit and a represen!
a
such executives to be presSHIV DAS DELHI UNIVERSITY SERIES
discussion with internal auditors of
St z any signif f
the findings of any internal auditors of a a
nan any intemal investigation, Sean
regularity o1 i i
ach mate age (Busty oF a failure of inne oad
the cause behind Substantial defaults i
*bentureholders, Shareholders and Creditors =
the adequacy of internal audit function,
audit department, staffing and seniority
verage of reporting structure and frequency
ie functioning of the whistle blower mechanism,
appointment of CFO (Chief Financial Officer)
ns of the applicant,
function as provided under the terms of zefrey
‘ae
joans and/or holding company in a subsidy
es or 10% of the asset size of the subsidi
existing loans/advances/ investments,
ittee will be Independent Director,
ers must have the ability to read ad
the Secretary to the Audit commit
shall invite the Finance. aie ‘3
audit and a representative:
res to be present at the meeting>shonizatio
izatio
mn shorsial Reporting
nal Check and Irnen .
fossil fuel t
rental consciou
es
ut promoting equity in so
n ‘expected to allow
ntee equality of outcome
itiatives and values. But, all of the
nd expl tenden
in. Thi ns thi