PROPOSAL TO DIVERSIFY FREIGHT BASKET AND INCREASE FREIGHT/PARCEL TRAFFIC REVENUE 1__| Zone NER. 2__| Target industry ‘CONSTRUCTION 3__| Target Commodity(ies) STONE 4 | Specify Traffic requirement- quantity and period (Eg. One BCN | 4-5 BCN RAKES PER MONTH rake per week etc, one VPN, Container rake ete.) 5 __ | Originating Station BN 6 | Destination station BHRB. 7 | Proposal REBATE UNDER STATION TO STATION RATE SCHEME FOR STONE TRAFFIC FOR 0-D PAIR BNV TO BHRB. PROPOSAL | SUBMITTED BY Mr. VIVEK AGARWAL, PROPRIETOR OF “MAA DURGA MINERALS” (GLOBAL CODE: MOM) ~_| Details and justification TT IS A NEW TRAFFIC PRESENTLY BEING CAPTURED FROM ROADWAYS, WHICH WILL ATTRACT ADDITIONAL STONE TRAFFIC FROM APDJ DIVISION TO NE REGION = __| Freight/Parcel traffic targeted FREIGHT TRAFFIC = _| Policy in force STS ~ | Comparative analysis with other modes for road (or other modes | NEW TRAFFIC as the case may be) in terms of rate/ton and NTKMSs etc. 8 | Policies/concessions which will be used along with the proposed change, if any (Tariff and non Tariff measures) 9 _| Existing classification of commodity 150 10 __| Classification proposed, ifany {117 outcome for Traffic- Quantitative targets for the commoditylies) proposed | Division [Total Existing rail | Targeted Targeted Additional | Increase | Additional Existing | Co-efficient | Additional | Loading Annually | intraffic | revenue Traffic Loading per (wm) (%) Over | annually from (wr) month Previous | Target Traffic (wt) Year (Rs Cr) ‘APDI O11 3% 0.0135 0.162, 59% 25 Cr (2022-23) 12 _ | Details of Zones existing loading of all Commodities for the current year and previous year (To be attached as additional sheet) Division | Nameofthe | Originating to Volume Revenue | 9% Variation over commodity (Bulk/ | Destin: (mt) (Rs Cr) Previous year | Non-Bulk/Parcel) | Station ls Total | Scanned with CamScannerPlease indicate any loadability trial (if required) has been conducted (Requisite form to be completed). 15 _| Please specify if PHOD and Finance have approved proposal Designation Sr.DOM/APD) DCM/IC/APDS Lg ee, So Sait ono) UMESH asso sac oe RT Signature Sx so Se arta oe a rales. Note: 1. The proposal should be implementable within the existing infrastructure. 2. 1f additional infrastructure or non-tarif resources/measures are envisaged the requirement, cost and timeline for implementation should be specified. 3.Any other document supporting proposal may be attached Scanned with CamScanner