Geothermal Resettlement Plan Dieng

Geothermal Development Project (RRP INO 52282)
Draft RESETTLEMENT PLAN
Draft
Project Number: 52096-001
November 2019
INO: Proposed Geothermal Power Generation

Project (Dieng Geothermal Plant Expansion Sub-Project)
Prepared by PT Deo Dipa Energi
The resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not
necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be
preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Term of Use” section of this website.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation
of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian
Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any
territory or area.
Dieng Geothermal Plant
Expansion Sub-Project
Resettlement Plan
PT Geo Dipa Energi
October 2019
i
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ IV
LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................. IV
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. V
DEFINITION OF TERMS ..................................................................................................... VI
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1
II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 6
A. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 6
B. SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 6
III. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ........................................... 9
A. LAND REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................. 9
B. DUE DILIGENCE CONCERNING LAND OWNED / LEASED BY GEO DIPA ................................ 9
C. INVENTORY OF LOSSES (IOL)...................................................................................... 12
D. SCOPE OF IMPACTS .................................................................................................... 13
IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE AND PERCEPTIONS OF AFFECTED PEOPLE ........ 18
A. PROFILE OF KARANG TENGAH ..................................................................................... 18
B. SUMMARY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY FINDINGS ..................................................... 19
V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................ 31
A. NATIONAL REGULATIONS ............................................................................................ 31
B. ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (ADB) POLICY ................................................................. 33
C. GAP ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 34
D. PROJECT RESETTLEMENT PRINCIPLES ........................................................................ 34
E. PROCEDURE AND PRINCIPLE OF NEGOTIATED LAND ACQUISITION FOR PIPELINE AND
INSPECTION ROAD ROW ................................................................................................... 36
F. LAND CLEARING PROCEDURE ..................................................................................... 38
G. UNANTICIPATED IMPACTS AND RP UPDATE. ................................................................. 38
VI. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION, AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ............... 39
A. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION............................................................................ 39
B. DISCLOSURE .............................................................................................................. 41
VII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ................................................................... 47
VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS .................................................. 50
A. ELIGIBILITIES.............................................................................................................. 50
B. ENTITLEMENT MATRIX ................................................................................................ 50
C. VALUATION OF ASSETS ............................................................................................... 54
D. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO SEVERELY AFFECTED AND VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS ........... 55
IX. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION .................................................................................... 57
A. SUMMARY OF LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION ASSESSMENT ............................................... 57
B. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION STRATEGY & ASSISTANCE PACKAGE .................................. 59
C. LONG TERM RE-ORIENTATION OF COMDEV PROGRAM ................................................. 62
D. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ...................................................................................... 63
E. ESTIMATED BUDGET ................................................................................................... 63
X. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ................................................ 68
A. ESTIMATED COST FOR RESETTLEMENT ........................................................................ 68
B. PROCEDURE FOR FUNDS FLOW MECHANISM ............................................................... 68
XI. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .......................................................................... 70
A. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................. 70
B. CAPACITY BUILDING ................................................................................................... 75
C. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR RP.......................................................................... 75
XII. MONITORING AND REPORTING ........................................................................... 77
A. INTERNAL MONITORING .............................................................................................. 77
B. INTERNAL MONITORING INDICATORS............................................................................ 78
ii
C. EXTERNAL MONITORING ............................................................................................. 79
D. REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE .................................................................................... 81
APPENDICES
1. Status of Land Certification Process for GDE-owned land

2. Lease Agreement for Use land at GDE-owned (ex-mess GDE) site
3. IOL Questionnaire and sample map
4. Map of the 6 plots land to be acquired
5. Confirmation from Head of Karang Tengah Village on the land ownership status of 6 land
that to be acquired
6. Lay-out map of the individual plots of land leased to 23 tenant farmers
7. List of tenant farmers and size of plot leased
8. Lay out map of occupied land between well pad 10 to well pad 7
9. List of AHs, Losses and Summary of Socio Economic Profiles
10. SES data collection instruments
11. Karang Tengah Village Profile and SES Results
12. Gap Analysis
13. Summary Community Consultation Reports for the Dieng Geothermal site
14. Attendance sheets for 4 FGDs
15. NGO Consultation Report, 11 October 2019
16. Dieng-2 draft PIB
17. Livelihood Restoration Assessment
18. TOR for Specialist NGO services (geo-social-spatial information system)
19. TORs for PMC Consultants for RP and ComDev Reorientation
20. Template for Internal Monitoring Report
21. TOR for External Monitoring Agency
iii
II. LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Project Components and Land Requirements for the Proposed Dieng Geothermal Power Plant
Expansion.................................................................................................................................................... 10
Table 2. Potential number of households affected by land acquisition and land clearingTable ............... 15
Table 3. Severely Affected Households ...................................................................................................... 16
Table 4. Vulnerable Affected Households ................................................................................................... 16
Table 5. Summary of Impacts due to Land Acquisition and Land Clearing ................................................ 17
Table 6. Profile of Karang Tengah Village .................................................................................................. 18
Table 7. Number of Persons Living with the AHs* and Number of Gainfully Employed ............................. 21
Table 8. Other Views Concerning the Sub-project ..................................................................................... 26
Table 9. Suggestions to Ensure that Benefits Accrue to Local Communities ............................................. 26
Table 10. Reasons given for support / rejection of the Project ................................................................... 27
Table 11. Best Ways to Mitigate Negative Impacts for Local Community .................................................. 28
Table 12. Best Way to Communicate Project Matters to Community ......................................................... 28
Table 13. Reasons for Responses Shown in Table .................................................................................... 29
Table 14. Party to Report Complaints to or to Seek Clarification Through ................................................. 29
Table 15. Consultation and Participation PlanTable .................................................................................. 43
Table 16. The Sub-project’s Entitlement Matrix .......................................................................................... 51
Table 17. Assessment Approaches Using Indonesia’s Valuation Standards ............................................. 54
Table 18. Livelihood Restoration Activities ................................................................................................. 60
Table 19. Implementation Schedule for Livelihood Restoration / Enhancement and new ComDev
Activities: ..................................................................................................................................................... 64
Table 20. Cost Estimates for Livelihood Restoration Plan and ComDev Reorientation Program under the
Dieng-2 Expansion sub-project. .................................................................................................................. 66
Table 21. Overall Cost Estimates For Resettlement Plan & Project Benefits ............................................. 69
Table 22. Responsibilities concerning Resettlement Plan implementation ................................................ 73
Table 23. Land Acquisition Implementation Schedule ................................................................................ 75
Table 24. Suggested Internal Monitoring Parameters and Indicators ........................................................ 78
Table 25. Suggested External Monitoring Indicators .................................................................................. 80
III. LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Proposed Dieng Geothermal Plant Expansion Components – Power Plant, new wells (in
existing wellpads), SAGS (new pipeline alignment within existing pipeline and inspection roads ROW) .. 7
Figure 2. Adjusted Transmission Line Route From Dieng 1 Substation to Dieng 2 Power Plant ................. 8
Figure 3. Map of the Dieng-2 Sub-project ................................................................................................... 14
Figure 4. Educational Attainment of Respondents ..................................................................................... 20
Figure 5. Educational Attainment of Affected Household Members ........................................................... 20
Figure 6. Primary Occupation of AH Members ........................................................................................... 21
Figure 7. Dependency Ratio of AHs ........................................................................................................... 21
Figure 8. Combined Monthly Income of 28 AHs (based on combination of SES and IOL results (from
Appendix 9) ................................................................................................................................................. 23
Figure 9. Location of medical services in relation to AHs: .......................................................................... 24
Figure 10. Source of Water Supply for Drinking and Washing ................................................................... 24
Figure 11. Garbage Disposal Practices among the AHs ............................................................................ 25
Figure 12. AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion sub-project ........................................ 25
Figure 13. Support for the Project ............................................................................................................... 27
Figure 14. How would you seek for clarification of submit complaints? ..................................................... 29
Figure 15. If you are still not satisfied, who will you approach for a solution? ............................................ 30
Figure 16. Land Acquisition Process for Pipeline and Inspection Road ROW ........................................... 37
iv
Figure 17. Grievance Redress Mechanism ................................................................................................. 49
Figure 18. Project Organisational Structure for Resettlement Plan Implementation .................................. 72
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(as of November 2019)
Currency unit – rupiah (Rp)
Rp 1.00 = $ 0.000071
$ 1. = Rp. 14,200
IV. ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank

AP Affected Person
APH Akta Pelepasan Hak/ Ownership Transfer Letter
AH Affected Household
BPN Badan Pertanahan Nasional / National Land Agency
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction
GDE Geo Dipa
GOI Government of Indonesia
GPGP Geothermal Power Generation Project
GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism
IPPKH Ijin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan / Licence to Borrow
of Forest Area
LRP Livelihood Restoration Plan
MOEF Ministry of Environment and Forestry
MOMR Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
MW Megawatt
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
NTP Notice To Proceed
PKK Pembinaan Kesejahteraan Keluarga / Village Women’s
Organisation
PMN Penanaman Modal Negara / State Equity Injection
ROW Right of Way
RP Resettlement Plan
SHGB Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan / Certificate for Use of
Building
SPS Safeguard Policy Statement
SS Sub-station
TL Transmission line
TOR Terms of Reference
v
V. DEFINITION OF TERMS
Affected persons Refers to any person or persons, customary or local community, private or
(APs) / public institution who are displaced (physical or economic) as result of
Community / temporary impacts during construction, restriction on land use or on access
Households (AHs) to legally designated parks and protected areas. The affected community/
households/person are those who utilize, control, or possess the affected
land or non-land objects.
Compensation Payment in cash or in kind (e.g. land-for-land) to replace losses of land,
housing, income and other assets caused by the Project. All compensation
is based on the principle of replacement cost, which is the method of valuing
assets to replace the loss at current market value, and any transaction costs
such as administrative charges, taxes, registration and titling costs. In the
absence of functioning markets, a compensation structure is required that
enables affected people to restore their livelihoods to level at least
equivalent to those maintained at the time of dispossession, displacement,
or restricted access.
Cut-off date Refers to the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area
makes residents/users of the same eligible to be categorized as AP,
regardless of tenure status. In this project, the cut-off date will be the final
day of the census of APs and the detailed measurement survey (DMS) of
APs’ land and/or nonland assets. APs will be informed of the cut-off date for
each project component, and any people who settle in the subproject area
after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation and assistance
under the project.
Displaced persons In the context of involuntary resettlement, displaced persons are those who
(DPs) are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of
shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to
assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary
acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to
legally designated parks and protected areas (ADB IR Source Book, 2012).
Eligibility Refers to any person who has settled in the subproject area before the cut-
off date who suffers from (i) loss of shelter, (ii) loss of assets (land, space
above and below the surface of the land, buildings, plant, and objects related
to the land) and/or or ability to access such assets, permanently or
temporarily, or (iii) other losses that can be appraised. such as transaction
costs, interest, loss of residual land, loss of income sources or livelihood
regardless of relocation, profession shift, and other types of loss stated by
the assignor, will be entitled to compensation and/or assistance).
Entitlement A range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration support,
transfer assistance, income substitution, relocation support, etc. which are
due to the AHs, depending on the type and severity of their losses, to restore
their economic and social base.
Income / This involves re-establishing productive livelihood of the displaced persons
Livelihood to enable income generation equal to or, if possible, better than that earned
Restoration by the displaced persons before the resettlement (ADB IR Source Book,
Program 2012).
This is a program designed with various activities that aim to support
affected persons to recover their income / livelihood to pre-subproject
levels. The program is designed to address the specific needs of the
affected persons based on the socioeconomic survey and consultations.
Inventory of loss The listing of assets as a preliminary record of affected or lost assets during
the preparation of the RP/RP where all fixed assets (i.e., land used for
residence, commerce, agriculture; dwelling units; stalls and shops;
secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; standing crops and
trees with commercial value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood
vi
inside the Subproject boundaries are identified, measured, their owners
identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement costs
calculated. The severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity
of impact on the livelihood and productive capacity of the APs are likewise
determined
Involuntary Refers to physical and economic displacement as a result of (i) involuntary
Resettlement acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access
to legally designated parks and protected areas. Such displacement can
be full or partial, permanent or temporary.
Refers to displaced persons have no right to refuse the land acquisition by
the state that results in their displacement. This occurs when land is
acquired through (i) expropriation by invoking the eminent domain power of
the state, or (ii) land is acquired through negotiated settlement when the
pricing is negotiated in a process where expropriation will be the
consequence of a failure in the negotiation. (ADB IR Source Book, 2012)
Land Acquisition The process where an individual, household, firm or private institution is
compelled by an agency needing land for public interest to alienate all or
part of the land it owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of
that agency in return for compensation at replacement costs.
Land clearing While land acquisition (defined above) refers to land to be purchased and
ownership surrendered by land owners to GDE, land clearing refers to GDE-owned
land that needs to be vacated by land users (tenant farmers, or farmers cultivating
GDE-owned land without permission) before it can be cleared for construction
activities.
Meaningful A process that (i) begins early in the project preparation stage and is carried
consultation out on an on-going basis throughout the project cycle; (ii) provides timely
disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and
readily accessible to affected people; (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere
free of intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive, and
tailored to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups; and (v)
enables the incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other
stakeholders into decision making, such as project design, mitigation
measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and
implementation issues
Negotiated Land The agency in need of land can carry out land acquisition directly with the
Acquisition respective owners through negotiation based on the result of appraisal by
an Appraiser or a Public Appraiser for the sake of efficiency. 1
Rehabilitation Assistance provided in cash or in kind to project APs (especially the
vulnerable) due to the loss of productive assets, incomes, employment or
sources of living, to supplement payment of compensation for acquired
assets, to achieve, at a minimum, full restoration of living standards and
quality of life.
Replacement cost The monetary value to replace affected assets and/or cover transaction
costs necessary to replace the affected assets without depreciation for
such assets as well as material advantage, taxes and/or travel expenses.
Resettlement Plan The social safeguard document that contains the policies and guidelines
and time-bound action plan with budget, setting out the resettlement
objectives and strategies, entitlements, activities and responsibilities,
resettlement monitoring, and resettlement evaluation.
1
Per Regulation No. 6 of 2015 of the National Land Agency (Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata
Ruang / Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan
Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 5 Tahun 2012 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pelaksanaan
Pengadaan Tanah) paragraph 53, and Presidential Decree of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 Year
2016 Concerning the Acceleration of Development of Electricity Infrastructures Article 34
vii
Severely affected Those who experience significant/major impacts due to (i) losses of 10% or
persons more of their total productive land, assets and/or income sources due to
the project; and/or (ii) relocation due to insufficient remaining residential
land to rebuild
Vulnerable groups Distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face the
risk of being marginalized by the effects of resettlement and specifically
include: (i) households headed by women, elderly, or disabled, (ii)
households falling under the generally accepted indicator for poverty, (iii)
landless households, and (iv) ethnic minorities.
viii
1
VI. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Project Description. To support expanded geothermal electricity generation in Java the

proposed Geothermal Power Development Project (GPGP) will result an additional 110
megawatts (MW) of geothermal electricity generating capacity, 55 MW2 at the existing geothermal
plant in Patuha - Ciwidey, Bandung, West Java and 55 MW at the existing Dieng geothermal plant
in Wonosobo and Banjarnegara Districts, Central Java.3
2. The Dieng Geothermal Expansion sub-project (Dieng-2) will include drilling of new wells for
geothermal fluid production and re-injection, and development of a steam above ground gathering
system and fluid reinjection lines connecting wells and generating units. Dieng will have a
combined cycle plant with both steam and Organic Rankine Cycle turbines. The sub-project will
also support the transmission interconnection systems between the plants and the grid; this will
include a new, 6-km underground transmission line to the Dieng Sub-station. The GPGP will
additionally strengthen GDE’s capacity to plan for, develop, and operate geothermal power plants
and enhancement of GDE’s Community Development Program through more strategic
engagement with the communities and evaluation of program.
3. Scope of the Resettlement Impacts. The RP will cover two sub-project components that
will require land acquisition and land clearing, resulting in involuntary resettlement impacts. The
expansion of the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant will require a total of 30.83 ha. Of this, 30.53
ha of land is already owned by PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) Dieng, while the remaining 3,010 m2
is privately owned land. This will be required for a 10 m wide and approximately 310 m long
corridor to serve as the Right-of-Way (ROW) the construction of a new pipeline and access road
from Wellpad 9 to the proposed site of the Dieng-2 power plant.
4. The inventory of loss (IOL) census carried out over 14 - 28 August 2019 documented
approximately 4 ha of land owned by GDE earmarked for construction of the Dieng-2 power plant
that has been leased to a farmer group 4 . Most of the other GDE-owned land identified for
construction of sub-project components are unencumbered except for 1 small plot of land (471
m2) in the new pipeline ROW,5 which is being cultivated by one farmer encroaching GDE’s land.
Land acquisition and cessation of activities on land currently owned by GDE identified for Dieng-
2 development will directly affect 106 persons (29 households) and indirectly affect 4 lease
coordinators (21 persons). All AHs reside in the village of Karang Tengah, (Kecamatan Batur,
Kabupaten Banjarnegara). No relocation will be required. However, many (24) of the affected
households will experience severe impacts (i.e. lose 10% or more of access to productive land
and/or income). 14 affected households are also categorized as vulnerable 6 . The data may
change following the detailed measurement survey (DMS) based on the final engineering design.
Project changes resulting in changes to resettlement impacts will be included in an updated RP.
5. Socio-economic Context in Dieng. Agriculture, particularly potato farming is the main

source of income in the Dieng area, including in Karang Tengah Village. Farmers also plant
2 Capacity values in this document refer to net generating capacity

3 ADB. 2019. Proposed Loan and Administration of Technical Assistance Grant. PT Geodipa Energi: Geothermal Power
Generation Project) Guaranteed by the Republic of Indonesia). Project Concept Paper, February 2019.
4 Comprising 23 members and 4 coordinators.
5 Between Wellpad 10 and Wellpad 7
6 Affected vulnerable households are those classified as households headed by women, elderly, or disabled, (ii)
households falling under the generally accepted indicator for poverty, (iii) landless households, and (iv) ethnic
minorities.
2
temperate vegetables and some fruits (carica7 and terung belanda8). Potatoes were a boom crop
between 1980 – 2000. Extensive and intensive potato farming practices have contributed to a
high level of soil erosion and decline in soil fertility. Over the last 20 years, productivity has been
declining and cost of production (agro-chemical inputs) increasing. Farmers are increasingly in
debt. Weaker and less competitive farmers are losing their farms (sold to settle debt) and being
forced into the labour market or migrating out of Dieng.
6. Socio-economic Profile of AHs. A socio-economic survey (SES) of 28 households

potentially affected by the Dieng-2 sub-project was carried out over 22 - 23 April and 14 - 23
August 2019. Educational attainment between the two genders is similar. About 12.7% of AH
members have not had a formal education, while about 53 % have completed primary education,
and 28 % have completed secondary and vocational education. There are 3 university graduates
among the AH members, two or whom are female. 11 out of 28 AHs are landless and 10 AHs
own less than a quarter ha of productive land. Only 4 AHs own between 0.51 – 0.75 ha of land,
while one AH owns more than 5 ha of productive land. Four out of 17 landed AHs possess land
certificates. All 6 land owners whose lands to be acquired by the project have “Letter C” village-
level documentation of land ownerhip. AHs’ monthly incomes range from Rp. 500,000 – Rp. 19.5
million. One AH has a monthly household income of approximately Rp. 200 million while another
is in debt due to 2 consecutive failed harvests. Four wives of AHs were documented as having
their own sources of income and contributing to household income. The women’s monthly income
ranged from Rp. 120,000 – Rp. 3 million. Two earned incomes by working as farm labour, one
earned income from a home industry, and one ran a small fertilizer business.
7. While Dieng Kulon and some other locations are benefiting from the growth of the tourism
industry, the sector is not as popular in Karang Tengah Village. In general, heads of households
and their wives are only familiar with potato and vegetable farming, and not keen to adopt
alternative livelihood activities. The younger AH members are more open to new activities. The
main source of water for consumption and other needs are water bodies (Telaga Merdada, Telaga
Siterus, Telaga Pawuhan) and mountain springs (Gunung Prau). All households are connected
to electricity supply. Most AHs use gas for cooking although there are still 5 AHs who use
firewood. All homes have bathrooms and basic toilet facilities. Garbage disposal is a problem in
Karang Tengah Village.
8. Gender Issues and Vulnerability. The gender strategy has been included in the RP.
Women have been and will be involved in the consultations. Socio economic survey considers
gender and women will be included in the GRM committee. One of four FGDs consulting AHs
regarding income restoration strategy preferences was designated exclusively for women, while
the FGD conducted for youth also included women. Among the 28 AHs, 4 are deemed elderly
(have difficulty with daily work because of old age) and 11 are landless. Four of the AHs are
considered poor. In total, 14 AHs (47 APs) are vulnerable. There is no female headed households
or widows among the 28 AHs. None of the AHs are disabled. All AHs are Javanese; there are no
customary minorities. When vulnerability data is combined with potentially severe impacts, all 14
of the vulnerable households are also potentially vulnerable to severe impacts and at risk of
impoverishment. Special attention will be given to them, as well as others who may be potentially
severely affected to ensure that they are able to continue their current potato farming-based
livelihoods and maintain, if not improve their current levels of income.
7 A genus (the type of the family Caricaceae) of chiefly tropical American trees that includes the papaya (Merriam-
Webster dictionary)
8 Batavica eggplant (on-line Indonesian-Latin translation).
3
9. AHs’ Perception of the proposed Dieng-2 sub-project. While many AHs did not have
comments, more AHs feel that the sub-project will results in negative impacts (12/28) rather than
benefits (6/28). More AHs do not support the sub-project (17/28) compared to those who do
(7/28). The reasons given were: (i) loss of income (9/28); (ii) proposed power plant proximity to
the residental area (7/28); (iii) perceived damage to homes (roofs) and crops (fear recurrence of
previous incident (4/28).
10. Communications and Complaints. AHs preferred project communications to be

conducted at village meetings (14/28),or conveyed via the Village Head and/or religious leaders
(11/28). With respect to complaints, 14/28 AHs said that they would seek information or submit
complaints to the village head, or via the lease coordinators (11/28) or deliver directly to Geodipa
Dieng (2). AHs are more familiar with communicating their queries or complaints verbally. If they
were to be dissatisfied with how their complaints have been handled, they will follow-up through
the lease coordinator (11/28) or Village Head (7/28).
11. Consultation and Disclosure. A series of consultations has been conducted for the
preparation of the RP. The first consultations with the APs, affected communities and
stakeholders (local NGOs, Kabupaten agency representatves) were held in March 2019 at village
offices. A total of 209 persons (163 men, 46 women) participated in the consultations.
Consultations continued during the IOL and SES when focus group discussions (FGDs) were
conducted with 77 persons (49 men, 28 women) to assess and discuss the resettlement impacts
and possible income and livelihood restoration programs to mitigate the impacts (loss of land,
loss of arable land). The second set of community consultations was held over 11-13 September
2019 at village offices. 178 participants (126 man, 52 women) attended the consultations. The
consultations were to seek feedback on the assesment findings and proposed mitigation
measures. The consultations will continue during the project implementation. A meaningful
consultation plan has been prepared to ensure participation of APs and stakeholders at project
planning, implementation, and monitoring. Participation of women and vulnerable groups will be
ensured. A summary of the RP and any updated RP in the form of a Project Information Booklet
or leaflets in Bahasa Indonesia will be distributed to the APs and made available at the GDE
Dieng Office.
12. Grievance Redress Mechanism. A grievance mechanism has been established to

receive, investigate and respond in timely manner to any complaints or grievances raised by APs.
A Grievance Focal Person will be designated at the Dieng Unit office to manage the GRM. GDE
has already discussed the GRM during the consultations (sosialisasi) with the APs and will
disclose the information through distribution of leaflets.
13. Legal Framework. This Resettlement Plan (RP) was prepared in accordance with
Government of Indonesia (GOI) laws, regulations and policies related to land acquisition and
involuntary resettlement, Relevant Standard Operating Procedures of PT Geo Dipa Energi
(GDE) as well as the Involuntary Resettlement of Safeguard Policy Statement of ADB (SPS
2009). The main legal framework used as the reference for land acquisition and involuntary
resettlement includes: (i) Law No. 2/2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in the Public
Interest and its implementing regulations, (ii) Presidential Regulation No. 62/2018 concerning
Handling Social Impact for Providing Land for National Development Projects; and (iii) ADB SPS
2009. The objectives of the Project resettlement policy are to avoid, or minimize if avoidane is
not possible), involuntary resettlement impacts, mitigate and compensate adverse impacts,
restore livelihoods, and improve the living standards of the vulnerable households. As per
government regulation, acquisition of land for the construction of the new pipeline and access
road will be undertaken either through negotiated land acquisition or direct purchase.
4
14. Entitlements and Compensation. Landowners will be entitled to compensation based

independent appraisal by the Office of Public Appraisal (KJPP - Kantor Jasa Pinalai Publik) and
negotiations. Land users (croppers) will be entitled to get cash compensation for loss of crops
income equivalent to a minumum of one year of net product market value based on independent
appraisal by the KJPP. Both landowners and land users will be provided with 3 months advance
notice prior to vacating the land to be acquired or cleared. Landowners and land users will be
allowed to harvest their last crop before vacating the land.
15. Income and Livelihood Restoration Programs. Income and livelihood restoration will
be provided to severely APs and vulnerable APs to ensure their living standard will not be worse
off due to the project. The Inventory of Losses (IOL) and Social-Economic Survey (SES) found
that there are 24 potentially severely affected households (86 persons) and 14 vulnerable
households 9 (47 persons). The programs include opportunity of employment during
construction, vocational training, and scholarships, procurement of equipment and materials, and
capacity building for the improvement of their current micro-enterprises / businesses. The
activities will be implemented over a period of three years after compensation payment and during
construction and will be monitored and reported on bi-annually to ensure effective restoration of
livelihoods and program sustainability. The income and livelihood restoration program will also be
expanded to the APs affected temporarily during construction and residents living near to project
areas as project benefits. Approximately 134 households will participate in the program. The
Livelihood Restoration Assessment also recommended some activities to reorient the Community
Development (ComDev) program so as to be more strategic and responsive to the political-
economic dynamics and existing livelihood security challenges within the Dieng economy.
16. Resettlement Budget and Financing Plan. A budget of IDR 21,351 billion
(approximately US$ 1,503,592) has been estimated for land acquisition and involuntary
resettlement as well as a reoriented Community Development program. The budget includes: (i)
costs for compensation, (ii) income and livelihood restoration, (iii) ComDev reorientation program,
(iv) monitoring, (v) administrative costs. A 10% contingency margin was included. GDE will
ensure timely funds disbursement and will prepare all the necessary plans.
17. Institutional Arrangements. GDE is the Executing Agency of the project, responsible for
overall coordination, policy directions, and administration, including those related to land
acquisistion and involuntary resettlement safeguard. A Project Management Unit (PMU) has
been established to manage the GPGP. The PMU will have a Government Relation and Social
Safeguards Assitant Manager responsible for social safeguards monitoring and
compliance, support for land acquisition activities (in coordination with general affairs (GA)
division), and programiing and budgeting livelihood restoration and ComDev activities in
coordination with Corporate Secretariat (CORSEC). At the GDE Dieng Unit level, the Social
Safeguards and PR supervisors will be responsible for supporting land acquisition and involuntary
resettlement activities and social safeguards compliance. Social safeguard consultants under the
Project Management Consultant will support the PMU in managing and monitoring social
safeguards.
18. Implementation Schedule. Land clearing activities (on GDE-owned land) will commence
in November 2019 and be completed by February 2020. Land acquisition activities will commence
in January 2020 and be completed by end of October 2020. A Land Acquisition Team (LAT) will
be established by January 2020. Land compensation negotiations are expected by July – August
9 All vulnerable households will also be potentially severely affected.

5
2020. The implementation of livelihood restoration activities will commence in FY 2020. Land
clearing activities are expected to commence by the first quarter of 2020. The Dieng-2 power
plant and pipeline construction will commence in the first quarter of 2021 and will be
commissioned by the third quarter of 2023.
19. Monitoring and Reporting. Internal monitoring will be undertaken by the PMU, assisted
by the PMC, throughout the land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process. Semi-annual
monitoring reports will be prepared during project implementation to report the progress of all
activities in the RP, including those related to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement. An
indepdent monitoring agency will be engaged by PMU to carry out land acquisition and
resettlement external monitoring and post- implementation evaluation.
6
VII. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
1. The Republic of Indonesia has the world’s largest geothermal potential, estimated at 29,000
MW. Since the issuance of the Geothermal Law in 2003, the Government of Indonesia (GOI) has
prioritized development of this resource. As of January 2019, the installed capacity of geothermal
energy in Indonesia was 1,948.5 MW (6.72 % of total potential). In the RUPTL10, the government
plans for an additional 4,443 MW of installed geothermal capacity by 202711. The government
also intends for state-owned enterprises, such as PT PLN (Perusahaan Listrik Negara – State
Electricity Company) and PT Geo Dipa Energi, to play an important role for sustaining geothermal
growth in the near term.
2. PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) is a state-owned geothermal company focused on exploration

and development of geothermal resources. GDE currently operates a 55 MW power plant at Dieng
in Central Java which was transferred to GDE after commissioning and after drilling. In the near
term, GDE plans to commission an additional unit at Dieng, which is proposed to be financed
under the Geothermal Power Generation Project (GPGP) (Project).
3. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide a loan to GDE to support expanded
geothermal electricity generation in Java to increase renewable energy baseload and reduce
Indonesia’s reliance on coal. The proposed GPGP will provide financing for expanding geothermal
power generation via the Dieng-2 sub-project – expansion of geothermal electric generating
capacity by 55 MW at the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant.
B. Sub-Project Description
4. The Sub-project will construct a new power plant, sub-station, transmission lines and
pipelines. No new well pads will be added, but 10 new wells 12 will be drilled on existing wellpads.
Table 2-1 provides a list of Dieng-2 components to be added to the existing Dieng-1 Geothermal
Plant facilities. The sub-project will include (a) drilling of new wells for geothermal fluid production
and re-injection, (b) construction of fluid collection and re-injection systems, (c) power plant, and
(d) transmission inter-connection systems. strengthen GDE’s capacity to plan for, develop, and
operate geothermal power plants and enhancement of GDE’s Community Development Program
through more strategic engagement with the communities and evaluation of program.
10 Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) 2018–2027 (Electricity Power Supply Business Plan 2018–
2027).
11 An increase of 15.32 % vis a vis total potential.
12 4 production wells, 5 injection well and 1 contingency well
7
5. The Dieng sub-project faces technical challenges and high-density of farming activities at
the Dieng reservoir location. As part of ADB’s assistance, the project will enhance health, safety,
emergency planning, and livelihood opportunities for nearby communities. The Dieng-2 sub-
project will not use any forest land except for laying of the proposed underground transmission
line which will pass under an existing pipeline and inspection road right-of-way (ROW) through
protection forest, for which PT Geo Dipa already has a permit (IPPKH). These activities will serve
as an example for how Indonesia’s geothermal resource in similar geographic contexts can be
developed without detriment to the existing surroundings.
6. Figure 2-1 provides a map of the location and- layout of the proposed Dieng-2 expansion
components recommended by the Dieng and Patuha Feasibility Study approved by the GDE
Board of Directors per August 2019).
Figure 1. Proposed Dieng Geothermal Plant Expansion Components – Power Plant, new wells (in
existing wellpads), SAGS (new pipeline alignment within existing pipeline and inspection roads
ROW)
7. Figure 2-2 provides a Google Earth map overlaid with the underground transmission line
alignment route recommended by the subsequent Transmission Line Feasibility Study of
September 2019.
7
8
Figure 2. Adjusted Transmission Line Route From Dieng 1 Substation to Dieng 2 Power Plant
9
VIII. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT
A. Land Requirements
8. Approximately 308,289 m2 (30.8 ha) of land will be required for the Dieng-2 sub-project. Of
this, 305,279 m2 is already owned by GDE and 3,010 m2 privately owned land will be acquired.
Table 1 below provides the land acquisition needs for the Dieng-2 sub-project. Land required for
the power plant site (Dieng 2) and all 5 well-pads in which 10 new wells will be drilled is already
owned by GDE. So is most of the land required for constructing new pipelines and an access
road. Approximately 3,010 m2 of additional (privately-owned) land will need to be acquired for a
new pipeline and inspection road ROW connecting Wellpad 9 to the Dieng-2 power plant site.
B. Due Diligence concerning land owned / leased by Geo Dipa
9. Of the 30.83 ha of land required for the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project, 99 % is already
owned by GDE. The status of land certification for the above land is provided in Appendix 1.
However, the certification process has not been completed for all parcels of land owned or leased
by GDE.
(i) Out of 45 pieces of land with separate titles, certificates for 20 pieces of land are still
being processed. GDE General Affairs Division estimates that the certification process in
the case of 16 parcels of land will be completed by the end of 2019.
(ii) The certification process for the remaining 4 pieces of land is expected to be completed
by end 2020. (These 4 certificates relate to Wellpad 10, a segment of the ROW between
Wellpad 30 and 31, and a segment of the ROW under which the underground
transmission lines will pass.
(iii) All certificates of GDE land use rights (HGB) status is valid until between 2034 – 2048.
However, there is one HGB certificate which is valid until 2024. This certificate is for a
segment of existing ROW in the Sikunang area through which the underground
transmission lines will pass.
9
10
Table 1. Project Components and Land Requirements for the Proposed Dieng Geothermal Power Plant Expansion
LOCATION OWNER OF REQUIRED AREA #

IR IMPACTS (YES/NO)
INFRASTRUCTURE LAND
NO
COMPONENT LOCATIO VILLAGE LENGTH WIDTH
WELL AREA (M2)
N (M) (M)
1 Power Plant (Dieng- Well 38 Karang GDE +.58,479 Yes
2) Tengah * 23 AHs (land users)
2 Underground 4 villages - GDE + 6,000 2 + 12,000 No

Transmission Line Karang Area required will be existing pipeline ROW
Tengah, owned by GDE. The TL will across provincial
Dieng Kulon, road
Bakal and GDE No
Sikunang13 Under existing inspection road and pipeline
and inspection road ROW.
Near sub- Sikunang Min. of No
station Forestry
3 Sub-station Sikunang GDE No
Will use existing Dieng 1
4 Well pads Pad7 SLR-7D Karang GDE ±13,900 No
Tengah
Pad9 SLR-9C, Karang GDE ±8,500 No
9D, 9E, Tengah
9F
Pad10 HCE- Kepakisan GDE ±22,100 No
10A Reactivation of old well.
Loc-O SLR- Karang GDE ±30,200 No
30B Tengah
Loc-Q SLR- Karang GDE ±41,100 No
31A, Tengah
31B
5 Pipeline & access Pad10 to Kepakisan 14 / GDE ±34,000 No
road Pad 7 Karang GDE ROW split by Village Road – 4 m wide
Tengah on either side of existing road.
13 Desa Karang Tengah, Dieng Kulon, and Bakal are located in Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten Banjarnegara, whereas Desa Sikunang is in Kecamatan Kejajar,
Kabupaten Wonosobo.
14 Desa Kepakisan is in Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten Banjarnegara.
11
LOCATION OWNER OF REQUIRED AREA #

IR IMPACTS (YES/NO)
INFRASTRUCTURE LAND
NO
COMPONENT LOCATIO VILLAGE LENGTH WIDTH
WELL AREA (M2)
N (M) (M)
Pad 7 to Karang GDE ±25,900 No
Pad 9 Tengah COI = existing ROW 12 m,
Pad 9 to Karang Private 10 +3,010 * Yes
Dieng-2 Tengah Land acquisition required (6 land owners).
PP
Triple Karang GDE ±28,100 No
junction to Tengah COI = existing ROW 12 m
pad Q
Loc-Q to Karang GDE ±31,000 No
Loc-O Tengah COI = existing ROW 12 m
TOTAL + 308.289
Notes: # Breakdown – owned by GDE (±305,279 m2 of which the TL will be under 12,000 m2 - 6 km long, 2 m wide), privately owned (3,010 m2) * Based on field
survey by IOL team (16 Aug. 2019)
11
12
10. Protected Forest Land Lease. Some of the GDE-owned land is located in protected forest
(hutan lindung) (see details in Table 2-1 and Appendix 1). Based on the documentation in
Appendix 1, only 3 parcels out of the above-mentioned 45 parcels of land are in protected forest
area. The necessary permits (IPPKHs) were obtained for all three parcels in 2013; the permits
are valid until 2037.
11. Encroachment of ROW as a result of Road Upgrading. The field investigation of the
status of existing pipeline and inspection road ROWs to be used for installation of new pipelines
conducted over 5-6 August 2019 found that in GDE does not own an intact ROW between Wellpad
10 and Wellpad 7. Before land for the ROW was acquired, a 4 m wide village road existed leading
past Wellpad 10. GDE acquired 4 m of land on either side of the village road which serves as the
ROW. However, the road is in the process of being widened to 6 m wide provincial road status.
The road widening has encroached on the GDE ROW. GDE will write to the Provincial Public
Works Department (Bina Marga, Dinas PU Propinsi Jawa Tengah) to take remedial action.
12. Underground Transmission Line crosses the Provincial Road. The proposed
transmission line (per Figure 2-2) exits the proposed Dieng-2 power plant site and crosses the
provincial road to join the proposed new pipeline and access road ROW between the power plant
and Wellpad 9. From this point, the transmission line will be laid under the existing GDE owned
ROW all the way to the sub-station. Laying of the underground transmission line along new and
existing ROW to the existing sub-station will involve digging / laying of underground cables across
the provincial road. This will cause temporary inconvenience to traffic (1-2 weeks). GDE will
communicate with the Provincial Public Works (Bina Marga) in order to obtain the permit for the
crossing and provide a temporary solution.
13. GDE owned Land Rented to a Tenant Farmer. Approximately 4 ha of the 5.7 ha “Mess
GDE” site earmarked for construction of the Dieng-2 Power Plant is currently being leased by
KODIPA (GDE’s cooperative) to a farmers group (Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani Merdada
Sejahtera) via the groups’s head coordinator 15 . The lease is renewed on an annual basis.
Appendix 2 presents a copy of the current lease (and receipt) for period 2018-2019, valid until
October 2019.
C. Inventory of Losses (IOL)
14. Methodology. The IOL was conducted over 22-23 April and 14 – 28 August 2019. The first
stage of the IOL was carried out in 22 – 23 April 2019 at the site commonly referred to as “mess
GDE” which was already fixed as the site for the Dieng-2 power plant. The land is approximately
5.7 ha in size. There are some buildings on the land owned by GDE and no people use these
buildings. The IOL was based on a mapping conducted with some of the tenant farmers and
coordinators followed by interviews with the 23 tenant farmers.16 The data derived from the (IOL)
may need to be updated through detailed measurement survey (DMS) following the final
engineering design and corridor of impacts carried out at the implementation stage of land
acquisition.
15. Following the final Feasibility Study (FS) results officially released on 8 August 2019, the
second stage of the IOL was conducted over 14 – 28 August 2019 and covered the following:
(i) Mapping of all existing GDE land components where Dieng-2 sub-project components
would be constructed. (See Figure 1 and Table 1.) This included:
15 There are 4 coordinators.

16 The interviews were conducted at the house of the head of the 4 coordinators.
13
a. Wellpads 10, 7, 9, 30 and 31;

b. existing pipeline and inspection road right-of-way (ROW) connecting the above
wellpads to the proposed Dieng-2 power plant;
c. the Dieng-2 Power Plant site itself; and
d. Underground transmission line route from the Dieng-2 power plant site, along new
and existing pipeline and inspection road ROWs all to way to the existing sub-
station (approximately 6 km).
The purpose of this exercise was to ensure that there was sufficient space for positioning
of proposed Dieng-2 components.
(ii) Measurement and mapping of the only land to be acquired – a 3,010 m2 corridor between
Wellpad 9 and the proposed site of the Dieng-2 power plant.
(iii) Confirmation of measurements and mapping of GDE land leased to 23 tenant farmers.
Identification of landowners and land-users (tenant farmers/renters, croppers), and IOL of
all affected crops in the 3,010 m2 corridor to be acquired. Appendix 3 provides the format
of the IOL questionnaire.
D. Scope of Impacts
16. Existing GDE-owned land that will be used for the Dieng-2 sub-project. The IOL
produced a set of maps of existing GDE-owned land that will be used for the Dieng-2 sub-
project.17 Figure 3-1 presents an alignment map for sub-project components overlaid on a google
earth photo produced by the IOL survey. The IOL indicates that the existing ROW of pipe lines is
sufficient for the construction of the new pipelines for Dieng 2 sub project.
17. Loss of Private Land. A total of 3,010 m2 of land owned by 6 AHs (27 APs) to be acquired
for the construction of a new pipeline and access road ROW. It consists of 6 land plots with legal
land rights (Letter C). The land is in Karang Tengah Village. All landowners are residents of
Karang Tengah Village. Appendix 4 presents a map of the 6 land plots. While the village records
were not sighed by the IOL team, the Village Head provided an affidavit confirming land ownership
status of the 6 plots of land (See Appendix 5). The land is productive land cultivated under
potatoes and temperate vegetables (cabbage, carrots, and leeks). Based on consultations with
the landowners on 23 August 2019, landowners asked for time to decide whether they would be
willing to sell their land. GDE Dieng Unit staff/ GDE LAT will follow-up to obtain their answer (in
principle). If the landowners decide against selling, or if they are agreeable but negotiations are
not successful, the route of the corridor will be adjusted.
18. Loss of Arable Land use by tenant famers. A total of 5.7 ha GDE-owned land (ex Mess
GDE site) will be cleared for the project. This site is located in Karang Tengah Village. This will
affect the Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani Merdada Sejahtera farmer group which comprises 23
tenant farmers18 (85 household members or APs), all of whom reside in Karang Tengah Village.
Appendix 6 presents a lay-out map of the individual plots of land leased to 23 tenant farmers
(land users or croppers). A list of the size of plots leased by each tenant farmer is provided in
Appendix 7.
17 The maps include; (i) overall alignment map; (ii) an index map; (iii) a set of 18 maps of existing pipeline and access /
inspection road ROWs; (iv) maps of 5 wellpads (7, 9, 10, 30 and 30 and 31); (v) map of proposed land acquisition
corridor between Wellpad 9 and the proposed Dieng-2 power plant site; (vi) map of the proposed Dieng-2 power plant
site (ex Mess GDE) showing plots of each of the 23 tenant farmers; (vii) map of area encroached by one cropper.
18 One of the tenant farmers is also one of the landowners of land to be acquired for the construction of a new pipeline
and access road ROW. His household consists of 6 persons. His household members have been counted under his
category as landowner.
13
14
19. There is one land user (penggarap) cultivating GDE-owned land between Wellpad 10 to
Wellpad 7. Appendix 8 provides a map on approximately 471 m2 of land the land user has
occupied.19 . A total number of 29 households comprising 103 people (household members) 20
will be potentially affected by land acquisition and land clearing activities (see Table 1).
Figure 3. Map of the Dieng-2 Sub-project
19 The cropper was not available (he was out of the country performing the Hajj) when the IOL and SES was carried
out The Village Head requested the survey team not to approach his wife but to wait until he had returned before
interviewing him. No household data was collected. However, the team was informed that he was prosperous (not
vulnerable, and not potentially severely affected).
20 Excluding the cropper who was not covered by SES.
15
21
Table 2. Potential number of households affected by land acquisition and land clearingTable
No. Of Households
Land
Sub-Project Affected By Land
Ownership Notes
Component Acquisition / Land
Status
Clearing
New wells to The well sites are already clear.
be drilled in Well drilling with a drilling rig will use water-based
existing material. There will be well testing
GDE None
Wellpads 10, The IOL found none will be affected by the sub-project.
7, 9, 30 and There are 5 croppers using GDEs land near Wellpad 31
31 (Loc Q), but they are outside of the corridor of impacts.
1 cropper on GDE land
New pipelines
The ROW for most of the existing pipelines and inspection
to be installed
roads are 12 m or more in width. They are well
/ constructed
maintained.
in existing
There will be no need for land clearing in the case of most
pipeline and GDE 1 AH
of the ROWs, except for the ROW from Wellpad 10 to
inspection
Wellpad 7 that will affect approximately 471 m2 of land
road ROWs
cultivated with potatoes/vegetables by 1 AH. The cropper
between
has assured GDE Dieng that he will vacate the land when
wellpads
GDE wants to use it
New pipeline
and inspection A corridor of land (3,010 m2) will be acquired as the ROW
road from for a new pipeline and inspection road connecting Wellpad
Privately 6 land owners
Wellpad 9 to 9 to the Dieng-2 power plant site.
owned
Dieng -2 Land will be cleared after ownership of the land has been
power plant relinquished by the landowners in favor of GDE Dieng.
site
New
underground
transmission The transmission line will exit the proposed Dieng-2 Power
line route from Plant site and cross a provincial road before joining a new
GDE None identified
Dieng-2 power GDE owned corridor / new pipeline and inspection road
plant site to ROW (to be acquired).
existing sub-
station
About 4 ha of the site has been leased on an annual basis
23 tenant farmers
to a farmers’ group -Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani
(one of whom is one
“Merdada Sejahtera” over the last 20 years.
of the above land
23 tenant farmers will lose access to productive arable
owners);
land which they have been leasing for between 10-20
Dieng-2 years. 22 of the tenants farmers will be severely affected.
Power Plant 14 of these farmers are also considered vulnerable.
GDE
site (Mess The current land lease between the KODIPA (GDE
GDE) Cooperative) and the head of the 4 coordinators on behalf
the farmer group (Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani
Merdada Sejahtera) will expire in October 2019. KODIPA
will not extend the lease. However, GDE/KODIPA will allow
4 co-ordinators of
the farmer group to continue using the land until end of
the farmer group.
January 2020, The land is scheduled to be cleared in
21 While land acquisition refers to land to be purchased and ownership surrendered by land owners to GDE, land
clearing refers to GDE-owned land that needs to be vacated by land users (tenant famers, or farmers cultivating GDE-
owned land without permission) before it can be cleared for construction activities
15
16
No. Of Households
Land
Sub-Project Affected By Land
Ownership Notes
Component Acquisition / Land
Status
Clearing
Feburary 2020, and construction activities are scheduled to
commence by March 2020.
The coordinators themselves do not cultivate any of the
GDE land. They are not vulnerable. GDE will provide
employment opportunity to the coordinators and acces to
livelihood restoration programs.
20. Loss of cultivated seasonal Crops (vegetables). All farmers were cultivating potatoes
and vegetables during the period of the IOL. There is 43,735 m2 of crop land that will be needed
for the project (mostly potatoes), of which 40,725 m2 is owned by 23 tenant farmers and
sharecroppers using GDE’s land and 3,010 m2 of which is privately owned by 6 different people.
GDE agreed to give 4-6 months’ notice before land ownership has to be relinquished to GDE and
will allow all landowners and land users to harvest their crops before handing over.
21. Loss of Structure. No structures will be affected.
22. Severely Affected Households. The IOL found that a total of 24 AHs (86 APs) will
potentially be severely affected by the sub-project consisting of 22 severely AHs due to land
clearing and 2 severely AHs due to land acquisition. Detailed data on severity is outlined in the
Table 3 below.
Table 3. Severely Affected Households
STATUS No. of AHs

Will potentially lose 10 – 25 % of productive land or total income 4
Will potentially lose 76 – 100% of productive land or total income 9
TOTAL 24
23. Vulnerable Households. Out of 28 affected households who were coverd by the SES,
there are 14 households (comprising 47 household members) who are considered vulnerable. All
14 vulnerable households belong to the group of 23 tenant farmers (who would be affected by
land clearing). None of 6 land owners (to be affected by land acquisition) is considered vulnerable.
Among 14 vulnerable households, 4 households (14.3 %) are considered poor (based on
Kabupaten Banjarnegara’s poverty line of Rp. 278,210 per capita / month for 2017), 4 households
(14.3%) are elderly (not able to cope with daily work due to old age) and 14 households (50%)
are landless. These categories are not mutually exclusive. See Table 4. There are no female-
headed households or widows among the 28 AHs. None of the AHs are disabled. All AHs are
ethnically Javanese; there are no ethnic minorities.
Table 4. Vulnerable Affected Households
Type / Combination Of No. of Tenant No. of Land Owning Total no. of

Vulnerability Categories Farmer AHs (APs) AHs (APs) AHs (APs)
Poor 2 (9) 0 2 (9)
Poor* and landless 2 (9) 0 2 (9)
17
Type / Combination Of No. of Tenant No. of Land Owning Total no. of

Vulnerability Categories Farmer AHs (APs) AHs (APs) AHs (APs)
Elderly 1 (2) 0 1 (2)
Elderly and landless 3 (7) 0 3 (7)
Landless 6 (20) 0 6 (20)
Total 14 (47) 0** 14 (47)
* Based on Kabupaten Banjarnegara poverty line of Rp. 278.210 per capita/month 2017)
** However, there are 2 land owning AHs with 8 household members (potentially affected by land
acquisition) who could be considered severely affected.
24. Appendix 9 combines severity of impacts and vulnerability data. 24 out of 28 AHs (85.7%)
are severely affected and/or vulnerable. All 14 of the vulnerable households are also potentially
vulnerable to severe impacts and at risk of impoverishment. Special attention should be given to
them, as well as others who may be potentially severely affected. A summary of impacts due to
land acquisition and land clearing is provided in Table 5.
Table 5. Summary of Impacts due to Land Acquisition and Land Clearing
Total land Requirements

Land owned by GDE 305,279 m2 (or 30.53 ha)22
Privately owned land 3,010 m2
Sub-Total 308,289 m2
Total amount of affected crops (only seasonal crops will be affected)
Predominantly potatoes with some temperate vegetables 43,735 m 2
▪ crops cultivated by land owners 3,010 m2
▪ crops culitaveted by land users 40,725 m 2
Total number of people affected
Number of affected land owners 5 households: 21 persons (HH members)
Number of land owners and also land users (tenant farmers) 1 household: 6 persons (HH members)
Number of affected land users 23 households: 79 persons (HH members)
Lease coordinator (indirect impact) 4 households: 21 persons (HH members)
Total number of severely affected people (lose >10% of productive 24 households: 86 persons (HH members)
land or >10% of income source)
Total number of vulnerable people 14 households: 47 persons (HH members)
▪ Number of poor households 23 2 HH: 9 persons (HH membes)
▪ Number of poor and landless households. 2 HH: (9 household members)
▪ Number of elderly headed households (cannot cope with daily 1 HH: (2 household members)
24
work).
▪ Number of elderly and landless households 3 HH: (7 household members)
▪ Number of landless households 25 6 HH: (20 household members)
No. of other forms of income activities affected
No. of small businesses (kiosks, warung etc.) and other forms of -
income generating activities affected.
22 Of which approximately 6 ha is existing pipeline and inspection road ROW under which the TL cable will be buried.
23 Per capita income/month below Kab. Banjarnegara poverty line for Rp. 278,210 for 2017.
24 Total no. of elderly households is 4 of whom 3 HH are also landless.
25 Total no. of landless househodls is 14 of whom 3 are also poor, and 3 are also elderly.
17
18
IX. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE AND PERCEPTIONS OF AFFECTED PEOPLE

25. This section presents a summary of the socio-economic information of the area and people
who will be potentially affected by the land acquisition and land clearing process. General
demographic data is presented for the Village of Karang Tengah. More detailed information was
gathered from a census of the impacted landowners and users of acquired land, as well as a
group of farmers currently leasing GDE land.
A. Profile of Karang Tengah
Appendix 10 presents a description of Karang Tengah Village. Table 6 provides a summary

profile.
Table 6. Profile of Karang Tengah Village
VILLAGE STATISTICS
Size of Village territory (wilayah desa) 488,811 Ha
Elevation above sea level 2,081 m
Average daily temperature ◦
15 C
Land Use:
▪ Dry land agriculture 250,831 Ha (51.3 %)
▪ Settlements 190,402 Ha (39 %)
▪ Home Gardens 2,331 Ha (0.5 %)
▪ Water bodies 20 Ha
▪ Village land (for cash) 28,138 Ha (5.8 %)
▪ Public Facilities 6 Ha
▪ Forest 9 Ha
▪ Total (488,811 Ha)
Number of Village Govt. personnel 11
Number of hamlets (dusun) 3
Number of tourist attractions (obyek wisata) 1
Number of homestays 5
Total population 4,992 people
Breakdown by gender 2,513 male,
2,479 female
Total number of households 1.400 HH
Number of people within productive age bracket (19 – 55 years 56 %
of age)
Dependency ratio 26 48.8%
Proportion of education who have completed schooling / 65.9 %
education
▪ proportion who have completed primary education only 52 %
(SD)
▪ proportion who have completed lower secondary school 7.8 %
(SLTP)
▪ proportion who have completed upper secondary school 5%
(SLTA)
▪ Diploma IV (Strata I) (35 people) 0.7 %
▪ Diploma I / II (11 people) 0.22 %
▪ Academy / Diploma III / Graduate (Sarjana Muda) (37 people) 0.74 %
▪ Did not complete basic education (primary school) 22 %
26 (Population within 0-12 years age brackets + population 55 years and above) / (Population within 13 – 55 years of
age brackets) x 100% (based on available data)
19
VILLAGE STATISTICS
▪ No formal education / not yet of school going age 11.4 %
Main sectors of Economy / Income
▪ Agriculture (food / seasonal crops) Rp. 10,000,000,000 (99.55% )
▪ Agriculture (estate crops) Rp. 5,000,000
(0.05 %)
▪ Trade Rp. 31,200,000
(0.31%)
▪ Services Rp. 6,000,000
(0.06 %)
▪ Home-stay Rp. 3,000,000
(0.03 %)
Number of Ojek (motorcycle taxis) in village 17
Welfare
▪ Well off (Sejahtera 3+) n/a
▪ Poor (Pra-sejahtera) 305 HH
▪ Poor (Pra-sejahtera 1) 150 HH
▪ Very Poor (Pra-sejahtera 2) 153 HH
▪ Very Poor (Pra-sejahtera 3) n/a
Types of social organisations present – women’s groups, youth,
professional. men’s group, LP3M, Self-help groups, Traditional
groups
Women’s Organization’s (PKK) Programs – active
B. Summary of Socio-economic Survey Findings
26. The Socio-economic (SES) was conducted for all 28 AHs27, and in accordance with the
gender strategy - 14 of affected heads of households (male), and 14 female AH members (50%,
all wives of household heads) were interviewed. Each AH was represented by one respondent.
This chapter presents a concise version of SES results. SES instruments are provided in
Appendix 10. SES methodology and all gender-disaggregated tables of data are provided in
Appendix 11.
27. Education. Educational attainment of 28 respondents is presented in Figure 4. Educational

attainment of the wives is relatively higher than that of husbands. The majority (53.6%) have basic
(elementary – SD) level education, and 25% have completed upper secondary education (or
senior high school - SLTP).
27 The survey was a census of all affected households.

20
Figure 4. Educational Attainment of Respondents
50
40
35.7
Percentage (%)
30
21.4
20 17.9
10 7.1 7.1
3.6 3.6 3.6
0
Never attended school Primary or Elementary Lower Secondary School Upper Secondary School
School
Male Female
28. Education attainment of 95 AH members is presented in Table 5. 52.6% of affected

household members have basic or elementary school education (SD). Some 27.4% have
secondary (junior and senior high school) education. There are 2 non-degree holders and 3
degree holders among AH members. Of the 3 University degree holders, 2 are female.
Figure 5. Educational Attainment of Affected Household Members
50
40
34.4
Percentage (%)
30
20 17.2
10.8
10 6.5 6.5 7.5 6.5
3.2 2.2
0 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.2
0
Never Primary or Lower Upper Vocational Non-degree University
attended Elementary Secondary Secondary School
school School School School
Male Female
Note * Information was not collected (answers not provided) in the case of 11 AH members
21
29. Economic Profile. Figure 6 presents the primary occupation of household members.
Based on the figures for responses from both men and women respondents, it would appear that
there are more male household members (51) than female household members (39). Of the 90
APs whose data was collected, 58 (64.4%) are farmers, and 18 (20%) are still attending school.
There was only 1 trader (who was a woman). One woman (wife) was documented as a farm
worker. Four people said they were retired.
Figure 6. Primary Occupation of AH Members
50
40.4
40
Percentage (%)
30
23.6
20
13.5
10 6.7 7.9
2.2 2.2
0.0 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.1
0
No, Attending Farmer Trader Farm workers Retired Other
School
Male Female
Note: * Occupations of 15 household members were not documented
30. Dependency Ratio.Table 7 provides data regarding size of AHs. In general, the size of
families is less than 5 persons. Table 7 also shows that there are 67 gainfully household members
in the 28 AHs – 55.2% of them are male, whereas 44.8% of them are female.
Table 7. Number of Persons Living with the AHs* and Number of Gainfully Employed
Number of gainfully employed members of the

Number of persons living with the AH
Gender of AH
AH Head 9 or
1 <5 <9 Male** Female** 1 2 3 4 >4 Male** Female**
>
Male-headed 0 12 2 0 29 20 2 7 3 2 0 19 13
Female- 1 4 0 18 17
0 11 3 0 28 26 2 7
headed
Total 0 23 5 0 57 46 4 14 4 6 0 37 30
31. Figure 7 shows that 85.7 % or 24 AHs have a dependency ratio of 0 – 1 (low dependency),
while 14.3% or 4 AHs have high dependency.
Figure 7. Dependency Ratio of AHs

22
Dependency Ratio of HH
3.6%
DR 0
3.6% 7.1%
DR 0.3
32.1% DR 0.5
DR 0.7
DR 1
35.7% DR 1.5
7.1%
DR 2
7.1%
DR 3
3.6%
32. Monthly Household income. 14 male heads of households provided their monthly
household incomes from agriculture, whereas only 6 women were able to provide reponses
regarding household income. IOL and SES data were combined to generate household incomes
for AHs. Complete figures for combined monthly income may be seen in Appendix 9. Figure 8
provides a graphic of household income for 28 AHs. There are four cases where wives have
income which they contribute towards household income. Wives’ monthly incomes ranged from
Rp. 120,000 to Rp. 3 million. 28 Based on the Kabupaten of Banjarnegara’s poverty line of
Rp.278,210 for 2018, there are 4 poor households. All poor household belong to the tenant farmer
group who cultivate GDE land.
▪ While husbands’ income is primarily from agriculture, with some (40%) also obtaining
income from farm labour,
▪ wives’ incomes were from farm labour, home industry and running a small fertilizer
business.
28Two of the above women respondents worked as farm labour earning Rp. 30,000/day. Both of them were from
households who cultivate land leased from GDE. On the other hand, the two wives who have small scale enterprises
belong to the the land owner group.
23
Figure 8. Combined Monthly Income of 28 AHs (based on combination of SES and IOL
results (from Appendix 9)
Combined Monthly Income of AHs (in Rupiah)
3%
7%
29%
25%
4%
11%
21%
<400,000 400,000-poverty line

Above poverty line-2,000,000 2,000,001~4000000
4,000,001-5000000 5,000,001-7000000
7000,001-above
33. Monthly household savings. Only four AHs declared they have monthly savings. The
amount saved varied from less than Rp. 400,000 to Rp. 4 million. All four AHs who have the habit
of saving belong to the tenant farmer group who lease GDE land. Of the four households, three
are not classified as vulnerable, while one AH is classified as both poor and landless.
Some Additional SES data to describe overall conditions and issues
34. A number of common community issues were raised during the community consultations
conducted in 6 villages in March and September 2019, as well as during consultations with local
NGOs conducted on 1 October 2019. These include (i) better access to health services for health
screening, (ii) water supply, and particularly access to potable water supply, and (iii) garbage
disposal linked to the increase in tourism activity in the area. These parameters were also covered
by the SES in relation to AHs who reside in Karang Tengah Village.
35. Location (proximity) of medical services. A health officer (mantri kesehatan) and nurse
(bidan) reside in Karang Tengah Village. There is a Health Post (Polindes) in the village of Karang
Tengah. Most of AH members make use of the Polindes for minor ailments 29 or make use of the
mantri or bidan’s services. For more serious ailments 30, they go to the Puskesmas (Community
29 These include cough and cold/flu, headaches, indigestion, and sprains.

30 These include stroke, heart disease, asthma, bone abnormality and a limp.
24
Health Centre) in Dieng Kulon (another village in the same sub-district / Kecamatan). In more
serious circumstances AHs members seek attention at medical facilities in the Kabupaten town
(of Banjarnegara or Wonosobo). Figure 9 shows the frequency of accessing medical services by
the APs in relation to location of the services.
Figure 9. Location of medical services in relation to AHs:
Location of medical services in relation to AHs
7%
14% Same village of the AH
In another village in the same

sub-district
In the district/town center
79%
36. Water Supply. Local residents (including the 28 AHs) obtain potable water from mountain
springs and water bodies – Telaga Merdada, Telaga Siterus, Gunung Prau, Telaga Pawuhan and
wells. Figure 10 presents source of water supply for household needs in the case of 28 AHs. In
general, AHs have raised water supply as an issue during the course of the SES.
Figure 10. Source of Water Supply for Drinking and Washing
Water Supply
46.4
35.7
Percentage (%)
28.6
17.9 17.9
14.3 14.3
10.7
7.1 7.1
Ground well Gunung Prau Telaga Merdada Telaga Siterus Telaga Pawuhan
belonging to the AH
Source of potable water Source of water for washing

25
37. Garbage Disposal. Based on the responses provided in Figure 11 below, it is clear that
there is a garbage disposal problem in Karang Tengah Village, which are indicative of similar
problems in the other villages in the Dieng geothermal work area, and corroborated during
consultations with local NGOs.
Figure 11. Garbage Disposal Practices among the AHs
Garbage Disposal
15% Buried by the AH
32% Collected by local

7%
government
Dump just anywhere
14%
Dump in river
Burned by AH
32%
38. The above-discussed issues will be addressed by GDE’s CSR/Community Development

Program that will be a part of the Sub-project to address in partnership with local communities in
order to deliver responsive support and benefits.
AHs’ Perception of the Proposed Sub-project

39. When asked about their view of the Dieng-2 sub-project, 6 out of 28 AHs opined that the
proposed sub-project would be beneficial, while 12 AHs feel it will have negative impacts. More
women compared to men voiced their fears of negative impact, while only men had a positive
perspective of impact. (See Figure 12) Ten (10) respondents had no opinon.
Figure 12. AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion sub-project
26
AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion

sub-project
57.1
Frequency - Percentage (%)
42.9 42.9
28.6 28.6
0.0
Beneficial Negative Impact No Opinion
14 heads of Ahs 14 Wives of Ahs
40. Table 8 presents other views regarding the sub-project. Eleven (11) respondents had no
opinion. Three (3) respondents felt that the sub-project would generate electricity as a benefit.
Eight (8) women respondents were concerned that the sub-project will negatively affect their
household livelilhoods. Three (3) respondents feel that the proposed new facility would be noisy,
and one said that she would be agreeable as long as the new facility is not noisy.
Table 8. Other Views Concerning the Sub-project
14 male Heads of AHs. Freq. % 14 wives of AHs. Freq. %

No comment 6 21.4 No comment 5 17.9
Electricity 3 10.7 Will cause loss of 3 10.7
livelihood
No assistance 2 7.2 Will reduce HH income 2 7.2
Many roofs damaged 1 3.6 Noisy, not safe, crops 2 7.2
damaged.
Noisy, brine wastes 1 3.6 Afraid that there will be 1 3.6
leakages which will
damage crops.
Up to the community 1 3.6 As long as not noisy, 1 3.6
it’s alright
14 50 14 50
41. When asked what there suggestions might be to ensure that local people receive benefits
from the sub-project, 17 people had no comment. 6 AHs requested that tenant farmers be
provided with access to replacement land (to lease) and one AH said that attention had to be
given to the tenant farmers. Two AHs were concerned that the Project be handled well and that
security would be ensured. (See Table 9)
Table 9. Suggestions to Ensure that Benefits Accrue to Local Communities

There is alternative land 1 3.6 Provided with / move to 4 14.3
made available replacement land.
27

Attention is given to tenant 1 3.6 Provided with alternative 1 3.6
farmers work
Total 14 50 Security is upheld 1 3.6
Project is handled well 1 3.6
Provide sosialisation to 1 3.6
the community
Up to Geodipa 1 3.6
Total 14 50
42. When asked whether they supported the proposed Dieng-2 expansion sub-project, 7 AHs
said they supported the sub-project whilst 17 AHs said that they did not support it. 4 AH had no
comment. As may be seen in Figure 13, more men then women supported the sub-project, whilse,
more women than men did not support the proposed Dieng-2 sub-project.
Figure 13. Support for the Project
Support for the Project

92.9
42.9
28.6 28.6
7.1
0.0
Support Do not support No Comment
14 heads of Ahs 14 Wives of Ahs
43. Table 10 presents the reasons provided for supporting or not supporting the Project. The
most concern was over loss of income or loss of access to source of livelihood.
Table 10. Reasons given for support / rejection of the Project
PARAMETER Male - Female - Total Frequency

frequency (%) frequency (%) of (%)
of response response
1. Reasons given for supporting
Dieng-2 sub-project.
- Village will become more 1 (3.6%) 1 (3.6%)
developed
2. Reasons given for rejecting the
Dieng-2 sub-project
- Loss of land / income / farming 1 (3.6%) 9 (32.1 %) 10 (35.7 %)
- Noise, steam, cause damage to 2 (7.1%) 2 (&.1 %)
potato crops
- Lose income as farm worker 1 (3.6 %) 1 (3.6 %)
28
PARAMETER Male - Female - Total Frequency

frequency (%) frequency (%) of (%)
of response response
3. Comments
- Up to the community (masyarakat) 1 (3.6 %) 1 (3.6 %)
- Should be given compensation for 1 (3.6%) 1 (3.6%)
loss of land
4. NO Comment 9 (32.1 %) 3 (10.7 %) 12 (42.9 %)
Note * one response re: steam overlapped / also included impact on income.
44. Table 11. According to AHs, the two main and best ways to mitigate negative impacts on
the local community would be:
i) Project should provide alternative land (to rent) or compensate farmers (28.6%)
ii) Project should be out of town away from settlements (21.4%).
This feedback informs decision-making concerning form of compensation for loss of access to
arable (productive) land, as well as project design.
Table 11. Best Ways to Mitigate Negative Impacts for Local Community

Ensure a distance between 4 14.3 No comment 6 21.4
the Project and residential
area (settlement) / build
somewhere elso
Compensation for affected 4 14.3 Alternative land for 4 14.3
people / compensation for farmers.
damages
No comment 4 14.3 Project should be out 2
of town, not at mess
GDE.
Improvement to Geodipa’s 1 3.6 Provide socialisation 2
development to the communities
Deal with the noise and 1 3.6
disturbance.
Total 14 50 Total 14 50
45. Table 12. According to the AHs, the best way to conduct sub-project communications was
via Village meetings (39.3%) or to relay the information via the Village Head and/or informal
religious leaders (50%). The pattern of responses was quite distinct between male and female
respondents. While male respondents favoured communicating via the Village Head, religious
leaders or Geodipa officers, all female respondents preferred village meetings as the mode for
sub-project communications. Indicative of other villages, this information informs the formulation
of the Communications Strategy with regard to project affected people as well local communities
in general.
Table 12. Best Way to Communicate Project Matters to Community

Via Village Head and/or 11 39.3 At Village Meetings 14 50
religious leaders.
Via Geodipa officers 3 10.7
Total 14 50
29
46. Table 13 presents AHs’ reasons for their responses. The main reason to have project
communications at village meetings was that everyone could hear the information for themselves
(14.3 %), and that the village would take responsibility for the information shared. 5 AHs (17.9 %)
requested that the lease coordinators be present as spokespersons/intermediaries for the tenant
farmers at village meetings.
Table 13. Reasons for Responses Shown in Table

So everyone can hear 3 10.7 Meeting with tenant 3 10.7
directly from the source farmer group
Inform Village Head first, 2 7.2 Village will take 1 3.6
who will inform responsibility
community later.
Via coordinators 2 7.2 Among farmers 1 3.6
Total 14 50 14 50
47. If you have concerns or doubts regarding Project implementation eg. accuracy of inventory
results, level of compensation or contractor’s activities, whom will you submit your concerns or
complaints to? While women respondents preferred to go to the Village Head to seek for
clarifications or make complaints, the men preferred to go to / through their lease coordinators.
Only 7.2 % said they would go directly to Geodipa.
Table 14. Party to Report Complaints to or to Seek Clarification Through

Lease coordinator 7 25 Village Government 6 17.9
Village head 5 17.9 Coordinator 3 10.7
Direcly to Geodipa 2 7.2 Village Head 2 7.2
Total 14 50 Village Head or 1 3.6
coordinator
Will follow what others 1 3.6
decide
No comment 1 3.6
Total 14 50
48. How would you seek for clarification or make your complaint? A majority (75%) would
seek clarifications or make complaints verbally.
Figure 14. How would you seek for clarification of submit complaints?
30
How would you seek for clarification or make your

complaint ?
46.4
Frequency - Percentage (%) 32.1
17.9
3.6
Verbally Written Verbally No comment

14 male Heads of Ahs 14 wives of Ahs
49. If you are still not satisfied with how a complaint was handled, to whom will you raise the
matter again? The highest ranked person respondents AHs would approach for solutions (if still
not satisfied) would be land lease coordinators (39.3%). Some 25.1% said that they would
approach the Village Head. By and large, male respondents preferred to approach their land lease
coordinator for solutions if they were not satisfied.
Figure 15. If you are still not satisfied, who will you approach for a solution?
If you are still not satisfied, who will you approach for a
solution?
32.1
25
17.9
7.2 7.2 7.2

3.6
Coordinator Village Head Have never No comment No comment Village Head Coordinator
complained
before
14 male Heads of Ahs 14 wives of Ahs
31
X. LEGAL FRAMEWORK
A. National Regulations
50. The main legal framework for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement is Law No. 2
of 2012 regarding land acquisition for development in the public interest 31 and it’s implementing
regulations including Presidential Regulation (Perpres) Number 71/2012 concerning Land
Acquisition for Public Interest and Perpres No 148/2015 on the Fourth Amendment to the Perpres
No. 71 of 2012.
51. Law Number 2 of 2012 provides provides a clear procedure and time frame which will
accelerate the process of land acquisition. The Government should undertake land acquisition by
involving all entitled holders (pihak yang berhak) and concerned entities. The entitled parties shall
be those who control or own the object of the land acquisition, inter alia: (a) the holders of land
rights; (b) the holders of land rights to manage; (c) nadzir for the waqf32 land; (d) the owners of
former customary rights secured land; (e) customary communities; (f) the parties occupying the
state land in good faith; (g) land tenure holders; and/or (h) the owners of buildings, plants or other
objects related to the land. The object of land acquisition includes; (i) land; (ii) above ground and
underground space; (iii) plants; (iii) buildings; (iv) objects related to land; and (v) other appraisable
loss that include non-physical losses such as loss of business, loss of job, cost of change of
location, cost of change of profession, and loss of the remaining property (residual property that
is no longer viable). Land acquisition should be conducted by providing fair and adequate
compensation to the entitled parties. The law recognizes that: (i) persons controlling and utilizing
land are entitled to compensation; (ii) all losses - lost land and non-land assets, other structures
that can be valued - should be evaluated by an independent appraiser; (iii) project location permit
will be required that should refer to spatial planning; and (iv) land acquisition will be undertaken
by National Land Agency (BPN).
52. The equivalence assessment carried out by ADB in 2017 – 2019 indicates there are more
than 50 other laws and regulations related to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement.
53. To settle the issue of people using Government or State owned enterprise land, in addition
to the Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012, in 2017 the Indonesian Government issued
presidential Regulation No. 56 of 2017 concerning Handling Social Impact for Providing Land for
National Strategic Projects that was amended by the Presidential Regulation s No. 62/2018
concerning Handling Social Impact for providing land for National Development Projects. It
regulates the provision of compensation in the form of money or relocation to non-titled land users.
This regulation requires that compensation should consider the cost of mobilization, cost for
moving, house rent during the transition period, and loss of income. It also requires the proponent
to produce documents on the Social Impact Management Plan in the event that affected
government land has been physically used/ controlled by the community consecutively for a
minimum of 10 years. The Social Impact Management Plan shall be proposed to the Governor,
which subsequently forms an Integrated Team to undertake data inventory, compensation
appraisal, and facilitate grievance management.
31 Public interest means the interest of the people, State, and society that must be realized by the government for the
prosperity of the people. Article 10 of the law states that development of power generators, transmission lines, sub-
stations, networks, and electricity distribution are categorized as public interest.
32 Waqf - an inalienable religious endowment in Islamic law, typically donating a building or plot of land or even cash
for Muslim religious or charitable purposes. The donated assets are held by a charitable trust or waqf organizer.
32
54. Presidential Regulation No. 148 of 2015 provides that land acquisition in the public interest
concerning not more than 5 ha of land (i) can be acquired directly by the agency requiring land
with the land rights holders by way of sale or exchange or other means agreed upon by both
parties (Article 121, Clause 2.)., (ii) does not need to get location determination but should be
consistent with the spatial development plan (Tata Ruang / RTRW) for the area (Article 121,
Clause 2.), and (iii) valuation of the land is carried out by independent appraisal. The Kabupaten
of Banjarnegara no. 11 / 2011 regarding the Kabupaten’s (District’s) Spatial Development Plan
for Period 2011-2030 provides for the improvement of the Dieng Geothermal Power Plant facilities
(Clauses 5, 10, 18 and 20). Article 121 A of the Presidential Regulation No. 148 of 2015 states
that “land acquisition for development in the public interest which is undertaken by a private entity
can be done through sale transaction, exchange, or other agreed mechanism between the entitled
party with the private entity
55. In addition to the national laws and regulations, GDE has a SOP that provides procedures
for (i) lease of State Forest land, (ii) lease of Plantation land, and (iii) for changing name of owner
(balik nama) on land title documents. The SOP does not provide specific procedures for land
acquisition. PT Geo Dipa adheres to the relevant GOI regulations mentioned above.
56. Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 204) on the Assessment of Land Acquisition for
Development for the Public Interest. The Indonesia Professional Appraisers Society (MAPPI)
formulated the standards by adopting the development of international standards (IVS 2011).
Standards 204 provides guidelines for assessment of land acquisition object for compensation in
land acquisition for development in the public interest. Assessment includes adequate
replacement value of property and land. Assessment standards are also associated with other
standards, such as scope of assignment, land property and structures valuation, farmland
property valuation, valuation of property with particular business, business valuation, and
inspection of cases under consideration.
57. Other related laws /regulations:

(i) Government Regulation concerning Environmental Permit, Ministry of Environment
Regulation No. 17 / 2012 where vulnerable / severely affected people are identified as
early as possible through the Social Impact Assessment of AMDAL that also seeks
participation guidance from local communities in order to obtain the AMDAL and
Environmental Permit Issuance. This is likewise provided for in previous environmental
laws.
(ii) Law No. 11/2009 on Social Welfare and its implementing regulation Ministry of Social
Welfare Decree No. 39/2012 on Delivery of Welfare. Vulnerable / severely affected
people are identified as early as possible through the Social Impact Assessment of
AMDAL as referred to in the Environmental Law no. 32/2009 on Environmental Protection
and Management; Indonesia Government.
(iii) PP. 71 / 2008 On the Third Amendment to Government Regulation No. 48 / 1994; (PP.
27 / 1996 jo and PP. 79 / 1999 jo); Basic Law Government regulation that relates to tax
incentive or the income tax rate of land and / or building ownership transfer.
(iv) Law 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year
2007 No. 68, Supplement of State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No. 4725)
provides that development and land acquisition in the public interest should be carried
out in accordance with regional spatial planning.
(v) Act No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights describes vulnerable groups: the elderly, children,
the poor, pregnant women and people with disabilities. It also recognizes the differences
in and the needs of, adat or customary law communities that have to be observed and
protected by the law of society and Government” as well as the “Cultural identity of adat
33
law communities, including rights to ulayat (traditional or customary) land that need
protection.” It espouses that the acquisition of ulayat land by Government must be done
through due process of law following the free, prior and informed consent of adat
communities.
(vi) Law No. 40 of 2007 Concerning Limited Liability Company (PT) Article 74 (1) observed
all companies having its business activities in the field of and/or related to natural
resources, shall be obliged to perform its Social and Environmental Responsibility.
Implementation regulation is provided in the Presidential Regulation No. 47 of 2012
concerning Social and Environmental Responsibility of “Perseroan Terbatas”.
B. Asian Development Bank (ADB) Policy
58. The ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) combines three of its key safeguard
policies; environment, involuntary resettlement and indigenous peoples (IP).33 It aims to promote
sustainability by managing potential environmental and social risks. The two sub-projects (Dieng
and Patuha) do not trigger IP safeguard, and therefore, no IP plan is required. The Dieng sub-
project will result in land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, and the RP is prepared to
elaborate the displaced persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood strategy, institutional
arrangements, monitoring, budget, and time bound implementation schedule. The project is
considered category B as less than 200 persons will experience significant impact as per ADB
SPS.34
59. The objectives of the involuntary resettlement safeguards are to avoid involuntary
resettlement wherever possible; to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project and
design alternatives; to enhance or at least restore the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real
terms relative to pre-project levels; and to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor
and other vulnerable groups. Based on the ADB’s SPS, there are 12 policy principles related to
involuntary resettlement: screening, meaningful consultation, establishment of grievance redress
mechanism, livelihood improvement or restoration, assistance to displaced persons, improvement
of living standard for the displaced poor and vulnerable groups, procedure for negotiated land
acquisition, compensation and assistance for displaced persons without title to land, preparation
of resettlement plan, disclosure of resettlement plan and monitoring report, resettlement cost,
compensation payment prior to physical and economic displacement, and monitor of resettlement
outcome and impact to the APs living standard.
60. Involuntary resettlement does not apply for negotiated land acquisistion (land acquisistion
with willing buyer- willing seller). ADB encourages the borrower/client to acquire land and other
assets through a negotiated settlement wherever possible, based on meaningful consultation with
affected persons, including those without legal title to assets. Develop procedures in a
transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiat settlement to
ensure that those people who enter into negotiated settlements will maintain the same or better
income and livelihood status.
33 Source: http://www.adb.org/documents/safeguard-policy-statement
34 The involuntary resettlement impacts of an ADB-supported project are considered significant if 200 or more persons
will experience major impacts, which are defined as (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing 10% or
more of their productive assets (income generating). ADB financed projects are classified into the following IR
categories: (i) Category A: a proposed project is likely to have significant involuntary resettlement impacts; (ii) Category
B: a proposed project includes involuntary resettlement impacts that are not deemed significant; and (iii) Category C:
a proposed project has no involuntary resettlement impacts. Projects which entail physical and/or economic
displacement require the preparation of a resettlement plan. Source;
34
61. Other Policies. The ADB policy on gender and development adopts gender mainstreaming
as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring participation of women and that
their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for development activities.
62. Another key policy is the ADB Public Communications Policy that seeks to encourage the
participation and understanding of people and other stakeholders affected by ADB-assisted
activities. Information on ADB-funded projects should start early in the preparation phase and
continue throughout all stages of project development, in order to facilitate dialogue with affected
people and other stakeholders.
C. Gap Analysis
63. The GOI enhanced its country system in order to address land acquisition issues for
development projects in the public interest. The new Land Acquisition Law No. 2/2009 and its
implementing rules and regulations approximate harmonization with the ADB SPS of 2009. The
new law grants that persons with no legal title over the land they occupy or utilize are entitled to
compensation 35 for improvements found thereon, including compensation for job and business
losses, moving cost,36 etc. A land acquisition plan also needs to be prepared by the agency
requiring land. People affected by land acquisition are consulted and their complaints heard and
resolved in the most expeditious way during the planning and implementation of land acquisition.
64. There are still some gaps between the new Land Acquisition Law of Indonesia with the
ADB SPS but some gaps have been bridged by the provisions of other relevant laws. Remaining
gaps revolve around (i) the provision of livelihood recovery programs for severely affected people
and vulnerable groups to ensure that their lives will not be worse off due to the project, (ii)
relocation assistance for physically displaced residents and (iii) transition allowance. A
comparison between ADB SPS 2009 and GOI regulations on involuntary resettlement is
presented in Appendix 12 along with gap filling measures proposed as project policies.
D. Project Resettlement Principles
65. Based on the gap analysis presented in Appendix 12, this RP has been prepared and
formulated to meet Indonesian Laws and regulations and the ADB’s SPS. The RP is to guide the
Project’s land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process to support compliance with
Indonesian Law and ADB SPS. The objective of resettlement policy is to improve, or at least
restore, the livelihoods of all APs, especially vulnerable groups so that the living standard of APs
do not become worse off compared to pre-project levels.
66. Based on the Indonesian Laws and regulations and the ADB’s SPS, the following
principles will be applied for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement in all the Project
components:
(i) Avoid involuntary resettlement as much as possible. If this is not possible, impacts shall
be minimized by exploring project and design alternatives. Efforts to minimize
resettlement impacts have been taken by GDE through; (a) using GDE’s lands for Dieng
– 2; only 3,010 m2 additional land will be acquired for the sub-project through negotiated
35 See Act No.2/2012 Elucidation of Article 40.

36 Elucidation of Article 40 of Law No. 2/2012 with the following provisions: For building rights or land use right,
Compensation granted to the holder of building right or use rights on buildings, plants, or other objects related to land
owned by him/her, while Compensation on land granted to the holder of the ownership or management rights.
35
land acquisition; and (b) apply use of underground transmission cable for the construction
of the transmission line along approximately 6 Km from the proposed Dieng Unit 2 Power
Plant to the existing sub-station. Efforts to minimize resettlement impact will continue
during implementation.
(ii) Screen sub-project components during feasibility study or before preparation of
resettlement plan to identify involuntary resettlement impacts and risks and the likelihood
of impacts per subproject activity.
(iii) Carry out culturally appropriate and gender-sensitive social impact assessments (SIA) to
assess potential impacts on APs particularly with affected vulnerable groups.
(iv) Conduct meaningful consultations with affected APs, stakeholders, concerned NGOs,
and community groups to solicit their participation across land acquisition and
involuntary resettlement process and monitoring. Inform APs on the land acquisition and
involuntary resettlement process, their entitlements, and compensation and assistance
options. Pay attention to the need of vulnerable groups, especially those below the
poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, and those without legal title
to land and ensure their participation in consultations.
(v) Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate the affected persons’
concerns
(vi) Improve or at least restore the livelihood of the APs through (a) land-based income and
livelihood program; (b) replacement of assets with equal or higher value; (c)
compensation at full replacement cost for lost assets; and (d) additional assistance
through benefit sharing where possible.
(vii) Assist and compensate APs without title or any recognizable legal rights to land for non-
land assets at replacement cost.
(viii) Pay compensation for lost land and non-land assets prior to physical or economic
displacement. Civil works will not commence until APs are fully compensated, and other
entitlements take place. 
(ix) Disclose the RP document and its updates, if required to the APs and other stakeholders
in an accessible place and a form and understandable language. The RP will be disclosed
on project and ADB’s website. 
(x) Negotiated land acquisition will follow procedure in a transparent, consistent, and
equitable manner principles and be confirmed trough written record and verified by an
independent third party.
(xi) Monitor implementation of the resettlement planning and resettlement outcomes and
impacts on the standards of living of APs. Disclose the monitoring reports on the project’s
website and make it available on the project office;
(xii) The Sub-project will not issue the notice to proceed (NTP) for any construction works until
full payment has been fully disbursed to all APs and compensated APs have cleared the
acquired land and harvested their crops in a timely manner.
67. Acquisition of privately-owned land for the construction of pipeline and inspection road
ROW from Well Pad 9 to power plant will be conducted through negotiated land acquisition as
the land to be acquired is small plot (3,010 m2). According to the Indonesian legal framework,
land acquisistion less than 5 hectare can be undertaken through direct transcation with the land-
owners.37 In the case of the negotiation did not reach agreement and land owner refeused to sell
the land, GDE will find another land and make necessary reallignment of the pipeline and the
inspection road. In such case, ADB policy related to negotiated settlement applies. Land clearing
(take the GDE’s land used by 23 households for farming to be used for the project) for the
construction of power plant will be undertaken through involuntary resettlement. Principles on
37 see Presidential Regulation 148 of 2015.

36
involuntary resettlement safeguard of ADB SPS and prevailing Indonesian legal framework will
apply.
E. Procedure and Principle of Negotiated Land Acquisition for Pipeline and

Inspection Road ROW
68. Land acquisition will be conducted through a negotiated land acquistion or direct
transaction with the landowners. Expropriation and the use of government authority to remove
people forcibly will not be applied. The negotiated land acquisistion will apply the following
principles.
(i) Meaningful consultation with the affected persons including those without
legal title to assets;
(ii) Negotiation of compensation with the landowners will be conducted in
transparant manner. Should the negotiation does not reach an agreement,
landowners have right to exit from the negotiation;
(iii) Offer of adequate and fair price for land and/or other assets. The valuation of land
and non-land assets will be carried out by an indepdent appraiser. Depreciation of
assets value will not be applied. Transaction cost including tax associated costs and
cost of certificate of land deed official will be borne by the project;
(iv) Engagement of an indepdent external party to document the negotiation and
settlement process.
(v) Documentation of Recording of the process of negotiated land acquisistion including
consultation activities and negotiation of compensation.
69. To ensure that the APs do not become worse off compared to pre-project levels, GDE will
provide livelihood restoration program to the APs who will be severely affected because of the
land acquisistion. The program will be expanded to all the APs (See Chapter IX).
70. The steps of negotiated land acquisition for new pipeline and inspection road are detailed
below:
(i) GDE approves the ROW route (corridor of impact) of the project components.
(ii) GDE establishs a Land Acuqisition Team (LAT) which will involve Banjarnegara District
Government and and Land Office (KATR/BPN).
(iii) The LAT coordinates with the Village Head of the impacted village and sub-district
(Kecamatan) office for the land acquisistion process.
(iv) The LAT carry out a Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) with presence of the
landowners.
(v) The LAT consults with landowners on the land ownership and willingness of the
landowners to sell.
(vi) GDE mobilizes independent appraiser (KJJP) to carry out replacement cost assessment
with regard to land, crops / plants and structures. The KJJP carried out replacement
cost study with reference to the entitlemet matrix set in the RP (Para 99, Table 8-1).
(vii) The LAT asks the land price from the landowners and conduct negotiation with
landowners. Negotiations will be conducted following the negotiated land acquisistion
principle above (para 68).
(viii) GDE pays immediately the negotiated amount to landowners after all necessary
documents required for the land acquisition processes have been completed by
landowners. Payment will deliver directly trough APs bank account. In case APs have
no account, GDE will help to open new account in the bank nearest to the village.
37
(ix) The lad owners relinquish land rights and submit the evidence of ownership of land
acquisition objects to the LAT.
(x) Document and verify the negotiated land acquisistion process by independet external
party engaged by GDE to ensure the transparent process of negotiation and that equal
bargainingn power parties involved in the negotiation.
71. Figure 16 presents the steps of the land acquisition process to be conducted for the
pipeline and inspection road ROW.
Figure 16. Land Acquisition Process for Pipeline and Inspection Road ROW
38
F. Land Clearing Procedure
72. Steps to be taken for the land clearing will follow the procedure set forth in the Presidential
Regulation No. 62/2018. However, considering that the number of APs and their losses is small,
the land clearing might be conducted by the land clearing team which will be established by GDE.
Key steps for land clearing are as follow :
(i) GDE establishs Land Clearing Team (LCT) which will involve Banjarnegara District
Government
(ii) The LCT verifies and validates plots of GDE’s land used or controlled by the
communities (APs). The IOL results conducted by ADB TA consultant will be used for
the verification and validation.
(iii) The verification and validation will involve the communities (APs) who use or
control the GDE’s land.
(iv) The indepdent appariser engaged by GDE carry out replacement cost assessment
on the lost arable land and crops income of the APs to be used for calculation of
compensation amount. The entitlemet matrix set in the RP (Para 99, Table 8-1) will be
used for the assessment.
(v) The LCT determines eligible communities (APs), and formulate scheme and amount of
compensation based on assessment by independent appraisal.
(vi) GDE implements compensation payment to the APs with supervision by the
Auditor (BPKP)
(vii) Payment of compensation by GDE is done directly to the APs bank account. In
case the APs have no bank account, GDE will help the APs to open new bank account
at a the bank clossest to the village.
(viii) The APs clear their properties and no longer use the land for any purpose not later
thant 7 days after the compensation is received.
G. Unanticipated Impacts and RP Update.
73. Should unanticipated involuntary resettlement impacts emerge during project

implementation, GDE shall ensure the conduct of a social impact assessment and may (i) update
this RP, or (ii) formulate a new RP depending on the extent of the impact changes. Unanticipated
impacts will be documented and mitigated based on the principles provided in the project
resettlement policy set forth in the RP. The entitlement matrix of the resettlement plan may be
updated to reflect the relevant changes but the standards set in the original entitelemt matrix (in
this RP) can not be lowered when the RP is updated. GDE shall submit these documents to ADB
for disclosure on ADB’s website and convey relevant information in them to the affected
persons/community.
39
XI. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION, AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
74. This chapter discusses the required approach and plan for consultation and information
disclosure with Sub-project stakeholders impacted by the land acquisition process. The approach
has been developed to adhere to the requirements set out in relevant national laws and regulation
as well as the ADB SPS.
A. Consultation and Participation
75. The Indonesian legal framework and ADB's SPS and Public Communications Policy
emphasizes the application of meaningful consultation and participation of APs and communities
in development projects. The elements of meaningful consultation include:
(i) begins early in the project preparation stage and is carried out on an on-going basis
throughout the project cycle;
(ii) provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable
and readily accessible to affected people;
(iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion;
(iv) is gender inclusive and responsive to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups;
(v) is held at a time and venue convenient for women to ensure at least 30% women
participation; and
(vi) Enables the incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders
into decision-making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of
development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues.
76. Meaningful consultations will be carried out with the entitled parties/APs including
vulnerable groups to ensure participation from planning up to implementation. Particular attention
will be provided to the needs of vulnerable group and ensure their participation.
1. Consultation at Plannng Stage (during RP preparation).
77. The consultation activities started from the Inception stage (20 – 22 March 2019), continued
through IOL and SES activties in April and August 2019, and involved a second round of
stakeholder consultations conducted over 11- 13 September during the course of the Fact Finding
Mission. Information sharing meetings and consultations were held with (i) local authorities at
different levels – district (Kabupaten) and sub-district (Kecamatan), (ii) local community and
groups of affected households; (iii) local non-government organizations such as Women’s
Association (PKK), Farmer’s Association, Inclusive and Social Development Institute (ISDI),
Yogyakarta etc.38 The purpose of these meetings was to enable the relevant stakeholders to
become familiar with the sub-project, its general facilities, and understand clearly the probable
resettlement, social, and environmental issues that may evolve during the implementation of the
sub-project39
38 Follow-up consultations with more NGOs/CSOs are being planned.

39 During the meetings, the consultant teams relayed to participants the following topics: (i) General information of the
sub-projects, its lay-out / route and features; (ii) the location and scale of possible land acquisition and the village,
Kecamatan and Kabupaten this would affect; (iii) objectives and Principles of RP according to the requirements of
Government of Indonesia and ADB‟s policy on involuntary resettlement; (iv) schedules of socio-economic survey
(SES) and Inventory of loss (IOL); (vi) Livelihood Restoration program; (vii) Compensation or land replacement mode
(options for cash and/or in-kind compensation); (viii) Gender and vulnerable group issues; and (ix) Mechanisms of
40
78. Community and Stakeholder Consultations I with local communities and stakeholders in
March 2019 were conducted in 6 villages located in the Dieng Geothermal Work Area (Wilayah
Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng): Villages of Kepakisan, Pranten, Sikunang, Dieng Kulon, Karang
Tengah and Bakal.40 The participants realized the importance of development of a new power
plant with associated facilities, including pipelines. Mostly there was no objection to the existence
of the existing power plant, pipelines and transmission lines, or the proposed Dieng - 2 which was
still in the planning stage. People at Dieng conveyed that development is essential for equitable
distribution of electricity to the areas which lack it; even though they know that the power addition
will not directly be enjoyed by them. However, some requests and concerns were raised by the
communities: (i) that GDE needs to provide adequate compensation and ample notice if GDE will
utilize its land used by people for farming; (ii) GDE to provide income restoration program to the
communities near by the project areas; (iii) GDE needs to address impacts of water, air and noise
pollution from Dieng Geothermal plant activities; (iv) the large steam pipelines spoil the view of
the Dieng area which is a tourist attraction; (v) Pollution (leakages) that cause crops to die; (vi)
more community members be given opportunity to work at GDE Dieng. The public (stakeholder)
consultation reports is presented in Appendix 13.
79. Initial consultations held with 24 APs (tenant farmers - Kelompok Merdada Sejahtera.) using
GDE’s land and 4 coordinators as part to the Stage I IOL and SEC were conducted over 22 – 24
April 2019. The consultation revealed that (i) tenant farmers acknowledged rightful GDE-
ownership of the land, and were willing to surrend occupation of the land back to GDE as and
when GDE required, (ii) all tenant farmers requested to be granted access to alternative land to
lease in the event they lose access to the land currently being cultivated; (iii) tenant farmers only
have experience as farmers and farm labourers and are reluctant to embark on other forms of
livelihood activities; and (iv) very few of the affected people have education beyond primary school
and it appears that it is very difficult for local people to enter into / adopt new forms of livelihood.
A noteworthy comment made druing these consultations was that participants said that it was up
to the larger community whether they agreed with GDE’s plans to contruct a new power plant at
the proposed location.
80. Information was provided to the Village Head of Karang Tengah before the IOL, and SES
activities commenced on 14 August 2019. The meeting was to inform the Village Heads and APs
about the up-coming IOL and SES so that they will be aware and do not become worried about
field activities and are prepared to participate in SES and FGDs. The hamlet head (Kepala Dusun)
and village office representative and APs were involved in the IOL and staking out activity.
81. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were carried out with the APs over 21 – 23 August 2019
to discuss and formulate income restoration assistance (if applicable) and gender concerns. FGD
attendance sheets are provided in Appendix 14.
82. Community and Stakeholders consultation II. A joint stakeholder consultation activity was
conducted as part of the Fact Finding Mission to share and provide feedback on the main points
APs participation, grievance redress, monitoring and evaluation through all phases of RP preparation, updating and
implementation.
40 Consultations in the six villages were attended by 183 persons (139 (76%) male and 44 (24%) female. Participants
included community members (that include potential affected persons) living close to the project areas in affected 9
villages, representatives of village government, community-based organizations (including PKK, Karang Taruna,
Bumdes, elderly groups), sub-district government, districts agencies (Social, environment, and BKSDA), GDE
Headquarters and Dieng Unit, the TA consultants, and ADB. In addition, several interviews were also conducted with
key informants that include land renters/users, village heads, and community members.
41
of the draft RP. Village Heads, community leaders, APs, GDE HQ and GDE Dieng, ADB, and
consultants participated in the consultations. Participants see positive aspects of the consultations
and expect on an on-going basis consultation throughout the project cycle. Written information
was also requested rather than verbal information. Social issues raised by participants were partly
the same as March consultation 2019, but the submission of objections was softer. Some of those
concerns/issues have been addressed during the consultations and in safeguards plans, but
some need to be considered for improvement of mitigation measures and require GDEs attention.
Common issues raised are (i) opportunities of jobs at GDE, community development programs to
the communities, (ii). noise, community risks, water pollution/abstraction, impact during
construction, (iii). GDE’s support to women, (iv). The most critical issue was related to negative
perceptions about project which were raised by the head coordinator of tenant farmers of GDE
land, and former head of Karang Tengah Village. They assume the project will make residents
suffer. Increasing of noise will disturb people because their settlement is located very close to
proposed power plant. The second stakeholder consultation report is presented in the second half
of Appendix 13.
83. NGO Consultations. Consultations were also conducted with local NGO’s concerned with
Dieng and geothermal development on 30 August and 1 October 2019. Some issues discussed
during consultation was about degradation of environmental due to potatoe cultivation practice,
alternative source of livelihood, and how exgeothermal exploitation can be developed in harmony
with the environment and community welfare development. A summary of the consultations with
NGO is provided in Appendix 15.
2. Consultation during Implementation

84. Consultation will be continued over the course of the implementation stage in relation to
land acquisition, land clearing, implementation of livelihood restoration program and project
construction. Consultations related to land acquistion will be conducted by GDE LAT (Land
Acquisition Team) with support from Social Safeguards staff at the Dieng Unit, PMU, and PMC.
The consultation shall include, but not limited to:
(i) Socialization and consultation with AHs on their willingness to sell;

(ii) Results of social assessment and Detail Measurement Resut (DMS);
(iii) Entitlements/compensation packages and other forms of assistance;
(iv) Valuation methods per result of independent appraiser study; and
(v) Negotiations on the amount of compensation for affected land and plants
85. Table 15 summarizes information provision and consultations during land

acquisition/resettlement planning and implementation stages and also indicates the responsible
institutions.
B. Disclosure
86. The GDE (EA) shall provide information to and consult with the APs/affected and other
stakeholders in a manner appropriate for the anticipated project impacts. This requirement is
intended to facilitate engagement to establish and maintain constructive relationships over the life
of the project.
87. A Project information booklet (PIB) has been prepared describing the Dieng-2 sub-project
(see Appendix 16). The PIB will be translated into Bahasa Indonesia and distributed to the APs,
local Government (Village and Kecamatan), and other stakeholders. The PIBs will be made
available at GDE Dieng office and contractor’s office and will be accessible to the APs and
42
stakeholders. Any updated PIB following the RP update, if required will also disclosed as per
provisions of the PIB for the RP as mentioned above.
88. The approved draft RP and updated RP (if any) are required to be disclosed. These
documents will be generated and produced in a timely manner, and posted on both ADB and
GDE websites. The RP will be made available at GDE Dieng Office and accessible to the APs
and stakeholders. During project implementation, GDE will prepare monitoring reports on the
implementation of the environment and social safeguards and submit the same to ADB for review
on a semi-annually basis. These monitoring reports must be posted on both ADB and GDE
websites as well.
43
Table 15. Consultation and Participation PlanTable
No Stage/Activities Objectives Method Venue Participants (M/F) Timing Responsibility

A Planning Stage of
Land Acquisition
1 Stakeholder To inform the project Meetings 6 village Potential APs, Village 21-23 March GDE, ADB staff
Consultation plan, potential impacts, offices and sub-district 2019 and consultants
and obtain feedback on offices, community
the existing projects leaders, district
and planned project, environment agency,
especially on district social agency,
environment and social and district forestry
issues. agency, GDE, ADB,
consultants
M:167
F:46
2 Initial consultation To obtain feedbacks on Individual Farming APs 24 April 2019 GDE, consultant,
with APs (tenant the land clearing meetings area, APs F: 24 persons and 4 and head of
farmers / impacts.41 houses coordinators village
penyewa)
3 Consultation with Discussion related to Meeting GDE Head of Batur 6 August 2019
affected subdistrict GDEs community Dieng Unit Sundistrict, Head of
and village development program Office Village of Kepakisan ,
government Dieng Kulon, and
Karang Tengah All
men
4 Geothermal Goes Explaining what Socialization Batur Head of Subdistrict, 6 August 2019 GDE
To School Geothermal is in Subdistrict Student of UGM,
general by UGM Office GeoDipa, community
Lecturers, what Geo within the Subdistrict,
Dipa does, and the role representative of
of geothermal for the village official, District
region Public Works
5 Inform Village To inform on the Meeting Village Village Head 15 August GDE,
Head of Karang IOL/SES activities and Office 2019 consultant, and
Tengah re: obtain permission Head of village
41 Some environmental safeguards questions were also consulted at the same time.
43
44

IOL/SES activity
and survey of land
acquisition
corridor.
6 Discussion with Sharing information Meeting WWF WWF staff, ADB 20 August
WWF (NGO) related to national Office consultant, GDE 2019
policy related on Jakarta M=1
geothermal, including F =3
advocay programs
7 Discussion with Discussion related to Meeting Trans TV WWF staff, ADB 21 August
Walhi (NGO) Walhi concerns related Office consultant, GDE 2019
to geothermal M=2
development plan F=2
8 Consultation on To obtain feedback on FGD Village APs 22 – 23 GDE and SES
land acquisition land acquisition and Leader M: 49 August 2019 Consultant
plan land clearing house F: 28
9 Discussion with Discussions concerning meeting KARSA ISDI Founder, SES 30 August SES Consultant
ISDI (Inclusive and development office Consultant, KARSA 2019
Social challenges in the Dieng staff
Development area. M=2
Initiative, Universiti F=1
Islam Sunan
Kalijaga,
Yogyakarta
10 Stakeholder Obtain feedbacks from Meetings Village APs, Village and sub- 11 – 13 GDE, ADB staff
Consultation II APs and relevant office district Offices, GDE, September and consultants
stakeholders for on the ADB, consultants 2019
mitigation measures Total: 178
set forth in the RP M: 126
F: 52
B Land Acquisition and IR Implementation
I Land Clearing
1 Consultation on Obtain feedbacks and Meeting Village AP, Village and 2019 after IOL GDE, Land
IOL results, agreement on IOL office Subdistrict, Land result Clearing Team,
compensation and result and Clearing Team, GDE, completed Consultant
compensation compensation scheme consultant
scheme At least 30% of
participants are
women.
45

Ensure participation
of vulnerable groups
2 Negotiation of Free and fair Meeting Village AP, Village and End of 2019 or GDE, Land
compensation rate negotiations over the office Subdistrict, Land early of 2020 Clearing Team,
quantum of Clearing Team, GDE, after Consultant
compensation per consultant replacement
affected household cost completed
At least 30% of
participants are
women.
3 Compensation Payment Paid by Village APs, village office, Early 2020 GDE/Land
payment compensation, transferred to Office GDE, Consultant Clearing Team,
APs bank Bank
account
II Land Acquisistion
1 Consultation on Consultation forum to Meeting Village APs, Village and sub- 2020 or After GDE,
IOL Result verify and/or adjust IOL Office district Offices, GDE, 14 days of consultant, and
results consultants “pengumuman” Head of village
At least 30% of has elapsed.
participants are
women.
2 Negotiation of • Free and fair Meeting Village APs, Village and sub- 2020 or After GDE, Head of
compensation rate negotiations over the Office district Offices, GDE, result of IOL is village,
quantum of consultants (if completed and MUSPIKA, KJPP
compensation per possible KJPP no more
affected household. attend) complaints
Observed by third At least 30% of from affected
party (local NGOs / participants are households
CSOs) women.
45
46

▪ Informed the result of Ensure participation
appraisal from KJPP. of vulnerable groups.
3 Compensation Paid Compensation Paid by Village APs, Village and sub- 2020 or to be GDE, Bank
payments transferred Office district Offices, GDE, completed
and observed Bank officer. before
by third party At least 30% of economic
(local NGOs / participants are displacement
CSOs) women. Attention to (land clearing)
vulnerable groups. for
construction
mobilization.
III Livelihood Restoration Program
1 Consultation to Reconfirm income Meeting / Village APs, Village and sub- After the GDE, consultant/
Initiate Livelihood restoration programs FGD Office district Offices, GDE implementation NGO
(Income) are still feasible and and consultant of
restoration and generally acceptable. At least 30% of compensation
improvement Get the feedback from participants are payment
activities APs the program type women.
of income restoration. FGD with women
group and vulnerable
groups.
2. Consultations of To verify and Meeting / Village APs, Village and sub- After the GDE, consultant/
Livelihood implement the program FGD Office district Offices, GDE implementation NGO
(Income) agreed by Affected and consultant of
Restoration and person. At least 30% of compensation
improvement participants are payment and
activities women. FGD with during program
women group and implementation
vulnerable groups.
47
XII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM
89. A grievance mechanism is a process for systematically receiving, investigating and

responding to stakeholder complaints. Throughout the life cycle of the Project, queries and
grievances from the impacted community may arise hence a Grievance Redress Mechanism
(GRM) is established to address grievances raised. The GRM will be triggered in all instances
where a complaint is received by the Sub-project or its contractors (such as the land acquisition
consultants / sub-contractors).
90. To streamline existing procedures and be consistent with international best practice, a
GRM have been established and a grievance redress committee (GRC) have been set up. Figure
7-1 shows the basic process of the GRM. Grievance related to land acquisition andspecific aspets
to sub project activities, such as increased dust and/or noise or any other impact due to project
construction, should also use this mechanism. The objective of the GRM is to resolve complaints
related to the project in a time-bound and transparent manner. The procedures to file a complaint
and the details of the contact person(s) will be disclosed by the PMU and site offices in Dieng and
Patuha to the potentially affected communities prior to the start of land acquisition and
resettlement activities and construction works. More information on the GRM shall be posted on
billboards at the construction sites or as a flyer to be made available at the construction project
site office. The flyer will be available in Bahasa Indonesia.
91. GRC members will include the Head Office General Project Manager and the HSE
Manager of the PMU, the head or representative from the village (kecamatan), the Site Office
Project Manager, Public Relation (PR) staff, HSE Staff (i.e., environment and social safeguard
staff at Dieng or Patuha), the PMC, and a representative of the Contractor(s). The PMC will act
as the secretariat of the GRC. GDE will ensure fair representation of women in the GRC and
observe transparency in handling complaints at all times. The GRC will be responsible for
resolution of complaints (if any) within a month (30 calendar days) from the date it was received,
to maintain a record of complaints received and resolved, and to advise the complainant on the
decision made. The PMU (through the PMC) will create a database of complaints filed and
resolved. A complaint can be filed either in writing, by phone, or in-person to the designated
contact person on-site
92. GDE shall ensure that (i) an efficient grievance redress mechanism is in place and
functional to assist the affected persons and other stakeholders in resolving queries, conflicts and
complaints, if any, in a timely manner; (ii) all complaints are registered, investigated and resolved
in a manner consistent with the provisions of GRM detailed in the RP, DDR, and IEE/EMP; (iii)
the complainants/aggrieved persons are kept informed about status of their grievances and
remedies available to them; and (iv) adequate staff and resources are available for supervising
and monitoring the mechanism.
93. Procedures. The person filing the complaint can seek redress in three levels: (i) at the
site through the designated contact person at the site office (i.e. PR staff), the PMC, or the
Contractor, (ii) through the GRC, and (iii) the appropriate courts of law. Affected person
complaining can seek redress through the legal system of the Government of Indonesia at any
point in the GRM process. The levels to file a complaint is as follows:
48
(i) Level 1 – Site Office through the designated contact person (i.e. PR staff). Complaint
to be resolved at the Site Office level (i.e., environment safeguard staff or social safeguard
staff, PMC, Contractor) within five working days and advise the Complainant accordingly.
(ii) Level 2 – GRC. When a complaint is not resolved at Level 1, Complainant can submit the
complaint to the GRC. The GRC will convene, review the submission and make a decision
within 30 days from the date of receipt. The Complainant will be informed of the decision
in person or by mail. The Complainant shall be consulted by the GRC when identifying
grievance redress options. The GRC may collaborate with relevant agencies (i.e district
land office and TP4P/TP4D for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, District
agency of environment) to resolve the complaint.
(iii) Third level – Appropriate Courts of Law. When the complaint remains unresolved, the
Complainant will be referred by the GRC to the appropriate courts of law.
94. GDE will keep a record of the following: (i) contact details of complainant, (ii) date the
complaint was received, (iii) nature of complaint and agreed resolution/corrective action, (iv)
status of the complaint handling, (v) date the resolution/corrective action was implemented, and
(vi) the final outcome.
95. The summary of grievances filed and resolved will be included in the semi-annual
environmental monitoring reports submitted to ADB. The associated costs to maintain the GRM
will be borne by GDE.
49
Figure 17. Grievance Redress Mechanism

50
XIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS
A. Eligibilities
96. This RP covers the impacts of land acquisition and land clearing for all new facilities
including the Dieng-2 power plant, wellpads and wells, pipeline and access road ROW, and the
underground transmission line. The subsequent section discusses the implementation of the land
acquisition, land clearing and resettlement process conducted by the sub-project as of October
2019.
97. There are four types of displaced persons in the Dieng subproject;
i) Persons who lose their agricultural land with formal legal rights (certificate), or those
whose claim over the land is recognized as a full title including persons occupying the
state land in good faith.
ii) Persons who cultivate the lost land under or without lease arrangement
iii) Persons who lose income earning opportunities as a consequense of the project
iv) Vulnerable and Severly Affected People
98. The cut-off date sets the time limits to determine eligibility of persons living and/or with
assets or interests inside the project areas. Should they be adversely affected, they will be entitled
to compensation for their affected assets, including rehabilitation measures as needed, sufficient
to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project living standards, income-earning
capacity and production levels. The cut-of-date for all assets affected on the GDE land (land
clearing) are set at 31 August 2019, while for new corridor to be acquired will refer to the date
when DMS was completed done by GDE LAT. The cut-off date will be widely communicated by
the Sub-project in Bahasa Indonesia which is well understood in the area. Should any persons
occupy the Sub-project area, build new structures or grow new crops after the cut-off-date has
been announced, these new assets will not be eligible for compensation and/or resettlement
assistance.
B. Entitlement Matrix
99. The Project will provide the entitlements to the landowners and users according to the
specifications set out in Table 8-1. Project entitlements cover the scope of impacts and the
involuntary resettlement provided for in this RP.
51
Table 16. The Sub-project’s Entitlement Matrix
NO. TYPE OF LOSS ENTITILED PARTY / ENTITLEMENT DETAILS

PERSON
I. Loss of Land
1. Loss of land, including Those who have ▪ Cash compensation at replacement cost ▪ Valuation of compensation
agricultural and formal legal rights or and reflective of fair market value at the conducted by a licensed
residential land those whose claims time of payment of compensation; or independent property appraiser.
over the land is land replacement with at least similar It will be used for compensation
Applies to land recognised as a full attributes to the acquired land in term of payment by the GDE
acquisition title, including people value, productivity, location, and titling.
occupying State land ▪ Any taxes and transactional cost borne
in good faith. by the project.
6 AHs ▪ Financial assistance for the renewal of
the land ownership documents
(certificate and land documents
recognized as full title) for the residual
area of the entitled persons' land.
▪ If the remaining affected land can no
longer function for the specific use and
utilization, the entitled party can ask for
compensation for their entire land at
replacement cost (Law No. 2 / 2012
article 35).
II. Loss of Crops
2. Loss of crops Owners regardless of ▪ Annual crops: compensation will be paid ▪ Valuation of crops will be
land tenure status based on prevailing market rates. determined by independent
Applies for land (with certificate of
▪ Perennial crops: compensation at appraiser.
acquisistion and land recognizable rights,
replacement cost taking into account ▪ 90 days advance notice before
clearing informal dwellers,
crops’ productivity and age. harvesting / land clearing.
▪ No deduction of depreciation for the
occupants)
29 AHs
valuation of crops.
52

PERSON
III. Economic Losses
3. Loss of arable land for People who have ▪ Cash compensation for loss of crops ▪ Loss of income allowance will be
farming leased / occupied income equivalent to a minumum of determined by an independent
GDE land for farming. one year of net product market value appraiser.
Applies to land clearing
▪ 90 days advance notice before
23 AHs
harvesting / land clearing.
• All cultivation activities end of
February 2020, after compensation
delivered
▪ APs are allowed to harvest prior
to land clearing.
IV. Temporary or Permanent Impacts on Non-land Assets during Construction

4. Temporary or For those who have ▪ For lease payments of the affected land ▪ 30 – 60 days’ notice given to land
permanent impacts due formal legal rights or by the contractor based on applicable owners before land is used
to construction. whose claim on land rental fees and agreement with land temporarily by contractor(s).
is recognized as a full owners. ▪ This agreement should be
right.
▪ For productive land, rental fee will not be stipulated in the contract /
less than net income that would have agreement with civil works
been generated from the affected contractor(s).
productive land.
▪ Compensation for non-land assets
acquired (trees, plants, structures)
permanently affected will be
compensated at replacement cost.
▪ Land will be restored to pre-project
conditions or better after construction
has been completed.
5. Those who have no ▪ Compensation for non-land assets
formal legal rights (trees, crops, structures) at full
(certificate) or replacement cost.
recognizable title ▪ No rental fee for the period of the
(informal dwellers, impact.
▪ Land will be restored to pre-project
croppers)
conditions or better after construction
has been completed.
53

PERSON
6. Government or State ▪ Rebuilding the facility or provide cash
enterprises / compensation based on the agreement
communal property with affected party(ies).
and assets (e.g.
schools, mosques,
village office power
poles, village road
etc.)
Other Appraisable Losses
7. Transaction cost Entitled party who ▪ Allowance to cover administration cost, ▪ Valuation will be determined by
Applies to land has lost land and renewal of land ownership for residual independent appraiser.
acquisition and land non-land assets land, land clearing.
clearing regardless the formal
legal rights to land.
8. Compensation for ▪ Cash compensation based on risk-free ▪ Valuation will be determined by

waiting period (interest) interest, Government bank interest. independent appraiser.
Applies to land
acquisition and land
clearing
9. Loss of resource base ▪ One household member per AH given ▪ LRP will be integrated with GDE
(high risk of the opportunity for employment in CSR / ComDev Program.
impoverishment) project related job during construction.
Applies to land
▪ Participation in livelihood restoration
acquisition and land
program (LRP).
clearing
10. Unanticipated impacts ▪ Compensation for any damages to the
or losses properties, based on prevailing
replacement cost
▪ Provisions of mitigating measures shall
be mitigated and documented based on
project principles set forth in this RP
54
C. Valuation of Assets
100. As stipulated in the regulation, valuation of assets both for acquisistion of private land and
land clearing will be determined by independent appraisal. Land acquisition assessment applied
the Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 204). The bases of assessment are: (i) Fair
Replacement Value–this value can be understood as a value based on the interests of the owner
(the value to the owner);42 (ii) Market value equivalence;43 (iii) non-physical losses caused by the
compulsory right relinquishment of property owner; 44 (iv) property ownership is not limited to
ownership rights, but can be interpreted as control, management and use of property in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations or according to the agreed scope of assignment;
(v) valuation date is the announcement date, and the date of site determination for development
for public interest in accordance with the applicable legislations; (vi) value adding should be
calculated based on the risks incurred from owner’s potential losses. The adequate replacement
value must be higher than Property Market Value or at least equal to the compensation transaction
value of similar property (if the comparator is similar property from a compensation transaction).
101. Compensation assessment in this standard includes but not limited to: i) the construction
of resettlement; ii) education and motivation programs; iii) provision of working facilities; and iv)
business facilities compensation. Assessment approach is specified in the detailed SPI 204 (PPI
04).
Table 17. Assessment Approaches Using Indonesia’s Valuation Standards
Valuation object Calculation basis Approach Remark

Physical: Land or land & Market and Non- Market &
structures Market Income
Structure &/or New replacement cost Cost In principle, valuation standard
Complementary Facility with adjustments set by Independent appraisers’
association does not apply
depreciation for physical
condition of the affected
building. Depreciation deduction
for affected structures, will be
given back to the entitled parties
in the form of premium rate
Crops Markets & reasonable Income With the Discounted Cash Flow
cultivation calculation method for one cycle
norms Market For non-commercial plant, using
references from relevant
agencies.
Cost Immature crops
Non-Physical: Adequate Market and non- Income Based on applicable laws and
replacement of the loss market regulations
on right relinquishment Cost Losses due to termination or
from landowners who closure of business premises.
will be given a premium
42 Value to the owner is defined as the economic benefits derived from the possession or ownership of a property.
43 The market value is one of the basis for value determination by taking into account limited or entirely absent data
market. This market value can be compared with the value based on the potential use (without looking at the benefit
of land acquisition plan for the public interest).
44 Non-physical loss is other losses, as referred to in Law No. 2/2012, Article 33 f and its elucidation, applicable or
according to the agreed scope of Tenure.

55
Valuation object Calculation basis Approach Remark

Loss of income due to loss of
acccess to arrable land for
farming can be considered for
more than one cropping cycle
to 2 years
Loss of job or loss of Additional e.g.: fish farmers, restaurants, &
business, including compensation workshops - if no other
profession shift. calculated based on: provisions, can be considered for
- potential income45 an average 3 months for
- income for the last business & 6 months for the
month46 professional shift
Emotional losses e.g.: 5% - 30% from the market
(solatium) value of homes (land & building)
as stipulated in these guidelines
with the agreement of the
assignor.
Transaction cost Based on socio- Cost • Cost of moving
economic study • Cost of clearing
conducted by expert • Tax associated costs
consultant or applicable • Cost of Certificate of Land
laws & regulations Deed Official (PPAT)
Waiting period Based on the risk-free Based on applicable laws and
Compensation (interest) rate, or the government regulations
bank deposits interest
Loss of residual land Market Market data
Other physical losses Reparation cost Cost
102. As per SPI 204, loss of crops income due to land acqusistion or land clearing will be valued
with net product market value of the crops for more than one cropping cycle to two years, based
on type of crops, soil fertility and avalability of replacement arable land47.
D. Special Assistance to Severely affected and Vulnerable Households
103. Vulnerable AHs will be given preferential opportunity for employment in Project-related
jobs. GDE will identify the project related jobs and offer the vulnerable groups with jobs. Social
Safeguard Staff in Dieng unit and PMU will ensure that all of the vulnerable households will get
all information easily and secure all their compensation and assistance prior to land clearance.
104. Severely affected and vulnerable AHs are entitled to participate in a livelihood restoration
program to help keep their livelihood better or at least the same as before project. Livelihood
restoration activities were identified and prepared based on social impact assessment and in
close consultation with the APs. The program consists of short-term livelihood economic
45 For business - net income plus the liabilities of business costs need to be paid for the transfer, such as the cost of
permanent employees
46 For shift in profession
47 Some practices on assessment for compensation of lost crops in toll road development project indicate that the
appraiser will take a maximum value of 2 years of harvest income with consideration of one year for farmers to get
a replacement of arable land , and another one year to assist the farmers to meet the income before the land can
produce an optimum harvest. Minimum the appraiser will recommend loss of crops income equivalent to one year of
net product market value from the arable land.
55
56
productive activities and a reorientation of GDE’s Community Development Strategy and

Program. The program will be expanded to the communities around projects areas as part of
sharing project benefits among the GDE neighboring communities and as a vehicle for
implementing remedial measures for temporary impacts during construction. The detailed
scheme, target participants, timeline, and estimated budget are described in the following chapter.
105. Gender strategy. The following measures were / will be adopted to address gender
issues as well as for other vulnerable sectors in this sub-project:
(i) In conducting the Detailed Measurement Survey and consultations on resettlement
activities, both women and men will participate in the discussions. Elderly and disabled
will also be included (may be by representation);
(ii) Any meeting and or consultation will be held at time and venue convenient for women to
ensure at least 30% women participation;
(iii) Women will be given equal chance in getting hired for unskilled work and receive equal
remuneration for the same work as the men;
(iv) Women, the elderly, and disabled will be prioritized in livelihood restoration program to
be provided during RP implementation.
(v) Disaggregated monitoring indicators by gender and vulnerable groups will be developed
for monitoring social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood, and resettlement
activities; and
(vi) Women will be present in Grievance Redress Committees (GRCs).
57
XIV. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION
106. The Dieng-2 Sub-project recognizes the importance of ensuring that livelihoods are
restored (or ideally improved) for all landowners and users impacted by the projects land
acquisition process. It has identified that a total of 24 affected households are currently deemed
potentially severely affected, and a total of 14 are deemed vulnerable48 and as such, in addition
to the compensation provided, AHs will be provided with additional assistance from the sub-
project.
107. Methodology. In order to determine appropriate livelihood restoration activities, an

assessment was conducted of the economic situation in Dieng, of Karang Tengah Village, and of
the AHs themselves.
A. Summary of Livelihood Restoration Assessment
108. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Kabupaten Banjarnegara and Wonosobo is
dominated by agriculture, forestry and fisheries businesses. In the Dieng area, potato is the major
agricultural produce. Potato was a boom crop in the Dieng area in the 1980s-90s leading to
massive extensification (along the slopes and replacing forested areas) as well as intensification.
The Dieng landscape is dominated by potato mounds. As well, the financial and agro-chemical
industries have grown apace in the area. However, due to a number of factors, profitability of
potato production has declined over the last 20 years. But farmers remain trapped in a continuous
debt-driven cycle of potato cultivation which is becoming more and more risky leading to more
and more loan defaults. There is a documented dynamic in Dieng where land ownership is
growing in the hands of a few, while weaker and less competitive farmers lose their land and
homes and are forced into farm labour or to migrate out of the Dieng highlands to the less
profitable lowland areas49.
109. Apart from potatoes, farmers also grow a combination of temperate vegetables (cabbage,
carrots, leeks, and spring onions). An endemic fruit called carica (a type of papaya) is now widely
cultivated along the edges of potato and vegetable plots. This fruit is normally stewed in syrup
before it is consumed. Many carica processing home industries have grown up in the area. The
product is sold in Dieng, Wonsobo town centre, and to other provinces. The production of potato
crisps and crisps from other produce such as cassava and yam is popular for home consumption
as well as for sale. An endemic herb called purwaceng is also processed and sold as an herbal
product or combined with coffee and tea as a beverage. While the Kabupaten Tourism Agencies
provide training for starting-up of such small-scale food products businesses, the respective
Kabupaten Health Agencies monitor and issue licenses (PIRT) for the production of home-made
food products.
110. Another important economic sector in the Dieng Plateau is tourism. This has contributed
to the establishment of many homestays in specific locations around Dieng.50
48 All vulnerable household are also potentially severely affected.

49 Santoso, Hery (2019). (i) “Dieng – Perubahan Ekologi, Proses Produksi dan Identitas.” (a power point presentation)
(ii) “Kejayaan dan Ketersingkiran. Proses Diferensiasi di Kalangan Petani Kentang di Dataran Tinggi Dieng”, and
(iii) “Pembentukan Relasi Kapitalis dalam Proses Produksi Kentang di Dieng.” (2019)
50 e.g. Dieng Kulon where ancient Hindu temples are located, Sembungan Village – the highest village in Indonesia
from where tourists trek up a further half an hour to catch the sunrise panorama from Sikunir Peak, the Sikadang
crater and many other sites. Apart from homestays, many small businesses have started up to cater for the tourist
market – tour guiding, food outlets, shops and stalls selling souvenirs and handicrafts, shops and counters selling
57
58
111. A number of reports have been prepared and activities conducted which have produced
information relevant for the formulation of livelihood restoration measures for local communities
in the Dieng Geothermal Work Area (Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng). These are: (i) a social
mapping study; (ii) consultations and FGDs with the APs and Stakeholders conducted between
18-26 March and 9-17 September 2019;51 (iii) gender action plan related to women’s access and
participation in income and livelihood restoration.52
112. While most of the concerns raised during the first round of community consultations (18-
26 March 2019) were about negative environmental and construction related impacts. However,
the following points were recorded during the second round of community consultations (9-17
September 2019):
(i) Both men and women in all the 6 villages are keen to obtain information about skilled and
unskilled job opportunities as well as business opportunities from Geo Dipa Unit 2 project,
and to be invoived in projects. Women participants said that currently there is lack of
information about job and business opportunities and requested that information on job
and business opportunities should be disseminated using various media such as flyer,
banner, and WhatsApp application. A man in Bakal Village added that information
disseminated through flyers, bannesr and WhatsApp should use simple language. They
asked GDE prioritize local people/neighboring communities for work at GDE and
information preference through village offices, not “paguyuban” or other intermediaries.
(ii) Training and mentoring on mechanic and welding for youth has been design by GDE’s to
give more skill which will enable and empower youth to work in non-farming sector,
including opportunity to work in GDE Dieng unit as skill worker.
(iii) Participants in general affirmed that they have received some direct benefits in the form
of GDE’s on-going ComDev program, but they expected GDE to continue providing
community development support for education, youth programs, waste management and
sustainable environment development, SMEs training and inputs.
(iv) Decline in drinking water quality (potential contamination) and decrease in water supply
during dry season was articulated by participants from Kepakisan, Sikunang, Dieng Kulon
and Pranten. They requested GDE to provide water supply program to address this issue.
(v) Various other suggestions related to Geo Dipa Community Development Programs were
articulated:
▪ Focus on sustainable environment programs in particular waste management, and
renewable energy training programs.
▪ community development programs should include monitoring activities, including
monitoring of previous tree-planting activities which are now left abandoned.
▪ provision of early education/preschool.
▪ improvement of roads and bridges.
locally produced food products. The Dieng area also features a number of annual events which draw in both
domestic and international tourists – the Dieng Cultural Festival (early August) being the most popular.
51 Most of the concerns raised during the first round of community consutations were about negative
environmental and construction related impacts. The following inputs were recorded during the second
round of community consultations:
52 Gender Analysis (and Gender Action Plan), May 2019 – prepared by ADB staff gender consultants at
ADB-IRM following the above-mentioned public consultations.

59
113. In addition, the SES carried out over 14 – 23 August 2019 interviewed 7 successful local
entrepreneurs and conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with all affected households as
well a number of local community members with regard to potential alternative livelihood activities,
and preferences.
114. A livelihood restoration assessment which reviews available secondary as well as primary
data is presented as Appendix 17. The following sections present the main results of the
assessment. Based on a number of unanticipated but critical issues that emerged from the review,
the scope of the assessment expanded to generate a strategic recommendation for reorienting
the Community Development (ComDev) program so as to be more attuned and responsive to the
bigger socio-economic issues in the area.
115. Overall Strategy. At FGDs conducted on 22 and 23 August 2019, both heads of AHs as
well as their wives insisted that they only know how to farm (viz. potato and vegetable cultivation)
and are unwilling to adopt new livelihood activities. 53 In response to this, (i) entitlements for
offsetting resettlement impacts will include a sufficient quantum of compensation, and include
GDE facilitation in securing alternative plots of land for AHs to lease in order to continue their
current livelihoods. (ii) In addition, AH members will be prioritised to fill upcoming job and labour
vacancies at GDE Dieng, and to receive scholarships, and (iii) young working age members of
AHs (both men and women) will be prioritised for inclusion in a number of income restoration
activities that will be programmed over period 2020 – 2022.
116. Compensation. The quantum of compensation will include a transaction period of up to

12 months in order to secure alternative land to purchase or lease from the time they vacate
leased GDE land or relinquish acquired land to GDE. In effect, as the subject has already been
broached during the FGD session of 23 August 2019 and stakeholder consultations conducted
over 11-13 September 2019, AHs will have from September 2019 to January 2019 (4 months) to
identify and secure alternative land to lease or purchase. GDE will assist all tenant farmers to
secure alternative land for lease by March 2020. While this comes under the “compensation
entitlement”, this essentially constitutes the first part or layer of the income restoration strategy.
B. Livelihood Restoration Strategy & Assistance Package
117. Employment at GDE Dieng. In the short term, the second part of the income restoration
strategy will be to prioritise AH members for employment in sub-project activities (fulfilling
standard requirements of the plants or the new construction). Information preference through
village offices, not “paguyuban” or other intermediarie ,.54 As a longer term measure, scholarship
opportunities will be prioritised for potential children in AHs in order to prepare them to fill future
HR needs. This will be synchronised with long term HR strategy for the Dieng Unit. That children
from AHs receive scholarships will alleviate part of household financial burden for children’s
education (equivalent to the outcome of a positive livelihood restoration intervention).
118. Livelihood Restoration Activities. Based on the FGD with the Youth Group (Karang
Taruna) and younger community members of Karang Tengah Village (which included young AH
members) on 21 August 2019, livelihood restoration (or development) activities will be
programmed under the ComDev program for period 2020 – 2022 to target younger family
53 In the case of the women, they claimed that they would rather work as farm labourers in the event they/their
households lose access to (rented) productive land.
54 Similar opportunities will also be given to 4 land lease coordinators
59
60
members of affected households who are not as keen as their parents on earning a living solely
from agriculture. This will enable and empower young AH members to contribute to overall
household income restoration. The proposed activities are presented in Table 9-1. The same
package will also be made available to approximately 104 households in 6 villages so as to
generate project benefits for the more vulnerable members of the community and/or those who
experience unexpected impacts during the construction phase. AH members will be given first
priority to participate in one or more of the activities over a 3-year period (2020-2022). This time-
frame will allow for social preparation (engagement, extension, identification of potential clients)
and establishing a good foundation for the income restoration activity (training, provision of
equipment, obtaining of permits – if necessary, facilitating access to micro-finance), development,
and achieving self-reliance (kemandirian) stages of micro-enterprise development. A value-chain
(business model development) study will also be financed in 2020 to support marketing of locally
processed products. All LRP activity packages will include activity-specific facilitation services
which will also provide extension 55 concerning livelihood diversification and security.56
119. Social preparation. The Dieng-2 social safeguards personnel will work with the Dieng
Unit PR officer in consulting and collaborating with respective Village Governments to identify,
select and prepare the various LRP activitiy target groups or persons for participation in annual
ComDev activities. Discussions (on 30 August 2019) with an NGO working in Dieng (Inclusive
Social Development Initiative UIN Kalijaga, Yogyakarta) highlighted an important lesson: the
community facilitation and development approach should factor in religious aspects, given social
conditions in the Dieng area.
Table 18. Livelihood Restoration Activities
Number
TARGET
Severely AHss and GDE’s
TYPE OF ACTIVITY PERSON /
vulnerable AHs Neighboring
GROUP
Communities57
1. Employment for unskilled AH members, 24 Vulnerable/Severely 30 community
labour at GDE Dieng (inc. community HH members from Karang members
project related work) members Tengah and from 6 villages
4 coordinators
2. Scholarships and board and Students from 24 students. 30 students from
lodging allowance AHs 6 villages
3. Value chain analysis, women Value chain analysis will 6 groups in 6
development for carica benefit all carica home villages
processing and marketing industries. (5-7 people per
(including 24 Vulnerable/Severely group)
permits/certification). HH members – 30–42 people
4. Value chain analysis and
development for processing women 1 group per
and marketing of potato crisps village
55 Extension is a process of working with rural people in order to improve their livelihoods. This involves helping farmers
to improve the productivity of their agriculture and also developing their abilities to direct their own future development.
(FAO)
56 Household livelihood security is defined as adequate and sustainable access to income and resources to meet basic
needs (including adequate access to food, potable water, health facilities, educational opportunities, housing, time for
community participation and social integration). Livelihoods can be made up of a range of on-farm and off-farm activities
which together provide a variety of procurement strategies for food and cash. (FAO).
57 Vulnerable households.
61
Number
TARGET
Severely AHss and GDE’s
TYPE OF ACTIVITY PERSON /
vulnerable AHs Neighboring
GROUP
Communities57
and crisps from tubers Value chain analysis will (6 people per
(cassava, yam, sweet potato) benefit all similar home group) – 36 ppl
including permits (certification) industries
24 Vulnerable/Severely
HH members
5. Training, mentoring for the 24 Vulnerable/Severely 30 persons for
following: Various HH members types of training
a) mechanic, (from all 6
b) welding, villages).
c) sewing
d) craft
120. In collaboration with the Dieng Unit PR officer, the Dieng-2 social safeguards and PR
supervisor will support implementation of LRP activities. The Dieng-2 Unit of the PMU will monitor
progress and results of LRP activities on a semi-annual basis. End-of-year M & E will evaluate
performance and provide recommendations for achieving RP targets of improving living standards
of AHs.
61
62
C. Long Term Re-orientation of ComDev Program
121. The proposed approach for generating benefits for local communities under the Project
is as follows:
(i) Expand the Livelihood Restoration activities to also reach other community members
(See the last column of Table 9-1). This is to promote a perception of fairness among on-
lookers.
(ii) Program specific activities that were clearly raised during the September round of
community consultations. This will include:
a. Provision of 12 new wells (2 wells per village) as an immediate response to
potable water supply issues (to be implemented in 2020).
b. Provision of periodic free health screening and follow-up medical services (from
2020 onwards), and
c. Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling, training and marketing of products for
an existing group in Sikunang Villages (2020).
(iii) Reorientation of GDE’s ComDev strategy and Program via institutional strengthening of
Village Governments. Increase critical awarenss of village governents and village level
activists regarding livelihood security and ecological degradation issues, and to empower
village governments to be able to undertake strategic planning, and to feed outputs into
the annual government development planning process (Musrenbangdes) as well as back
to inform GDE’s ComDev programming.
(iv) Implementation of new livelihood security solutions based on (iii).
122. The main activity identified for reorienting GDE’s ComDev Program in order to become
more strategic and less philanthropic is strengthening of local Village Government in development
planning and budgeting by developing a geo-social-spatial information system. (. The instrument
developed for this is based on GOI Law no. 6 / 2014 concerning Villages, and Minister of Villages,
Development of Isolated Villages, and Transmigration No. 16/2018 concerning priority for
utilization of Dana Desa funds for 2019.
123. Strengthening of the bottom-up/participatory planning process is meant to create greater

critical local awareness of the inevitable declining state of potato agriculture, diminishing carrying
capacity of the fragile highland eco-system, and the systemic process of accumulation and
dispossession, in order to advocate structural changes, and propose more strategic development
interventions that will help transform local livelihood strategies into more sustainable ones that
are able to sustain levels of welfare and also rehabilitate or at least stabilize degraded eco-
systems. It should be ensured that recommendations from the final climate change assessment
58
(to be shared with the PMU) feed into this process.
124. The on-the-job training process for this exercise will take 4 months per village. It will be
conducted by specialist NGO services have experience introducing and conducting the necessary
geo-social-spatial training at village-level. TORs are provided in Appendix 18.
58 Mutually beneficial conservation and water sharing measures between the geothermal proponents and local
communities in farming. A water for geothermal products/services exchange program could be explored; the GDE
conducts a series of capacity building on climate smart agriculture (e.g., water use efficiency and use of drought
resistant species in crop production, new geothermal applications for agro-aqua-industries, and water supply
forecasting and sharing, in exchange for GDE support or geothermal resources (e.g., steam, hot water, greenhouse
development) for the incubation of new livelihood opportunities for agri-aqua based MSMEs
63
125. The output of the exercise will be a web-based geo-social-spatial information system (with
dashboard) established and able to be managed by the trained village cadre, a publication which
Village Governments may use to communicate with Kabupaten, Provincial Government,
development partners and other stakeholders. If the activity in each village may be successfully
completed before August 2020, the outputs may feed into the annual Government development
planning and budgeting process (Musrenbangdes 59 ), update the village medium-term
development plan (RPJMDes 60 ), prepare village development work plan (RKP 61 ), as well as
inform GDE ComDev annual programming. New activities that are more strategic in responding
to community needs will enable better coordination of development budgeting under village
budget (APBDes62) and ComDev program budgeting. If the process cannot be completed before
August 2020, then outputs may feed into the 2021 planning and budgeting cycle. An updating
process will be conducted on an annual basis to generate progressive annual plans.
126. Proposals that emerge from this process that are directed towards the ComDev program
may be accommodated as part of the reorientation of ComDev approach towards more
responsive, strategic, and empowering assistance to local communities. An indicative budget of
Rp. 300 million / village / year has been preliminarily estimated 63 to finance these new activities
for period 2021-2024. Definitive annual budget allocation and total number of beneficiaries will
depend on the new activities generated by geo-soscial-spatial information system that will be
taken up by the re-oriented ComDev program.
D. Implementation Schedule
127. The implementation schedule for the livelihood restoration / enhancement, ComDev
reorientation and new livelihood security solution activities constituting a Community
Development program (to be financed under the Dieng-2 sub-project) is presented in Table 9-2.
E. Estimated Budget
128. Table 9-3 provides the estimated budget for the Livelihood Restoration and ComDev
Program to be financed under the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project. The total budget for period
2020-2024 is approximately IDR 17.463 billion (US$ 1,229,831).
59 Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan Desa

60 Rencana Pembanguan Janka Menengah Desa
61 Rencana Kerja Pembangunan
62 Anggaran Pembangunan Belanja Desa
63 based on consultations concerning annual ComDev budget allocations with the PMU / CORSEC.
63
64
Table 19. Implementation Schedule for Livelihood Restoration / Enhancement and new ComDev Activities:
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

No Step/Activity Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
1 Finalize LRA and ComDev packages
2 Prepare budget for LRP activities
Social preparation (identification/formation
3
of target gorups)
4 Implementation of LRP
4.1. Training
4.2. Delivery of equipment/inputs
4.3. Access to finance (if necessary)
Implementation of LRP and enhancement
activities (Development and Growth) for
5
30 AHs and 110 vulnerables HHs in 6
villages
Procure services of consultant/NGO for
6 developing geo social spatial planning
instrument
7 Implementation of ComDev activities
7.1. Digging and construction of wells (12
wells , 2 wells each villages)
7.2. Survey and design of water supply
rehabilitation for 6 villages
7.3. Rehabilitation of water supply for 6
villages
7.4. Consolidation of garbage recycling
activities for one group in Sikunang
Village
Provision of free health screening and
8
follow up services (100 households)
Conduct geo social spatial planning
9 instrument and method to strenghten local
village developing planning capacity
65
Planning and budgeting of annual

10 development activities for APBDes and
GDE Comdev
Implementation of new livelihood security
solutions (generated by program no 9)
11
under the Community Development
Program
12.1. LRP / ComDev mentoring
12 evaluation and reporting (incl.
Outcome)
12.2. Corrective action
65
66
Table 20. Cost Estimates for Livelihood Restoration Plan and ComDev Reorientation Program under the Dieng-2 Expansion sub-project.
No. Category / Activity Target Location 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL
(Rp. million)
A. Adjust HR strategy to create more
opportunities for hiring local
people (and to create better buy-
in from the community)
1 Priority to members of affected 24 AHs for 3 year Karang
households for suitable job period. Tengah
vacancies (2020 onwards) for 4 coordinators Karang
which they qualify. Tengah
30 HHs each from 6 6 villages *
villages/year
2 Identification, scholarships and 24 children from AHs Karang 240 240 240 240 240 1,200
training for potential youth in skills for 5 years Tengah
and higher education required for
operational stage of Dieng-2 and 30 children for 5 years 6 villages * 300 300 300 300 300 1500
Dieng-3 (2020 onwards).
B. Livelihood Restoration &

Ennhancement
3 Carica processing and marketing
a) AHs 2 groups (12-14 Karang 640 14 654
women) Tengah
b) Project Benefits 42 women 6 villages * 245 497 759 21 1,522
4 Food produce processing and

marketing
a) AHs 3 groups (18 women) Karang 640 18 654
Tengah
5 Vocational training and equipment

a) AHs 24 youth Karang 744 24 448
Tengah
67
(Rp. million)
b) Project Benefits 60 youth 6 villages * 884 66 950
C. Community Development
(Regular)
6 Digging / construction of 12 wells 2 wells / village 6 villages* 1,800 1,800
7 Free medical screening and 100 people 6 villages * 350 350 350 350 350 1,750
follow-up
8 Consolidation of waste (garbage) 6 groups 6 villages * 300 300

recycling (training, marketting)
D. ComDev Strategy & Program

Reorientation
9 Specialist NGO Services for 60 Village Cadres 6 villages 1,667 720 737 3,124
introducing geo-sosial-spatial (Village Govt., LKMD,
planning method to Village BUMDes**) and
Governments ** 6 village communities
Total 7,246 3705 3110 929 890 15,876
Contingencies (10%) 11 724.6 370.50 311 92.9 89 1,587.60
Grand Total (Rp. Million) 7,970.6 4,075.5 3,421.0 1,021.9 979.0 17,463.6
US$ 561,309.9 287,007.0 240,915.50 71,964.8 68,943.7 1,229,831.0
Note: * 6 villages - Karang Tengah, Kepakisan, Dieng Kulon, Bakal, Pranten and Sikunang
** LKMD (Lembaga Ketahanan Masyarakat Desa - Village Community Security Institution), BUMDes (Badan Usaha Milik Desa - Village Corporation)
** Strategic livelihood security improvement activities identified by this process (from 2020 onwards, on an annual basis) will be proposed for financing by Dana Desa /
APBDes (Village Development Allocations) as well as annual GDE ComDev budgets. (Will include water supply system rehabilitation for 6 villages.)
67
68
XV. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN
A. Estimated cost for Resettlement
129. Costs related to social safeguards will be financed by GDE. The cost includes: (i) detailed
costs for replacement of affected asset based on assessment by independent appraisal, (ii)
budget for implementation of three-year livelihood restoration programs (2020-2022) and
ComDev reorientation activities (2020-2024), (iii) operational costs, which consist of
administrative cost and budget for a land acquisition and assessment team to handle objections/
grievances, land appraisal, and measurement. A contingency of 10% of total amount was applied.
GDE will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient
and timely implementation of resettlement.
130. An estimated budget of IDR 21,351 billion (approximately US$ 1,503,592) is estimated
for procurement of land through negotiated settlement willing seller-willing buyer, to compensate
for loss of access to productive land, and to finance livelihood restoration activities as well as
ComDev reorientation activites (which will generate project benefits for the local communities) .
Table 10-1 provides the breakdown of the resettlement plus project benefits costs.
B. Procedure for Funds Flow Mechanism
131. Funding Mechanism for payment of compensation. Based on indicative amounts

provided in the RP, the PMU will prepare a budget allocation for land acquisition for 2020 to be
taken from State Equity Injection (PMN 64 ). However, given the experience of previous land
acquisition activities (2011) in Dieng, it may be prudent to allocate up to 2-3 times the indicative
amount specifically for the land compensation component. Once negotiations are successfully
concluded, the LAT will obtain account numbers for each of the affected household heads. In
case AHs do not have bank accounts, the LAT will assist the AHs concerned to open bank
accounts at the bank nearest to the village. Compensation funds will be transferred by GA division
directly to the AH accounts. The same mechanism will be apply for land clearing compensation
132. Funding Mechanism for Livelihood Restoration and ComDev Reorientation. The
planning and budgeting of Livelihood Restoration, and ComDev Reorientation & Program was
prepared by the consultant in close collaboration with PMU. As such, the budget for 2020 activties
is within the overall Community Development budget for 2020. Budgeting for subsequent years
activities may refer to Table 10-1. Funds will be allocated by the PMU and channelled through
GDE’s regular ComDev funding mechanism.
64 PMN – Penanaman Modal Negara.

69
Table 21. Overall Cost Estimates For Resettlement Plan & Project Benefits
No. ITEM TARGET 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL TOTAL SOURCE
(Rp. million / juta) (US$) OF
FUNDS
A. Land Acquisition and Clearing
1. From land owners 6 land owners 1,249 1,249
2. Compensation for 24 land users 24 land users 1,357 1,357
3. LCT and LAT Costs (4% of above) 104 104.
Sub-total (A) 2,710 2,710 190,845 GDE
B. Livelihood Restoration Plan
4. Un-skilled labour employment 58 persons
5. Scholarships (and living allownances) 54 students 540 540 540 540 540 1,700
6. Carica processing (micro-enterprise) 56 women 885 511 759 21 2,176
7. Processing of local produce (micro- 72 women 1,280 676 658 18 2,628
enterprise)
8. Vocational training 84 youth 744 908 66
Sub-total (B) 3,449 2,635 2,023 579 540 9,226 649,718 GDE
C. Regular ComDev
9. Construction of 12 wells 6 villages 1,800 1,800
10. Free health screening and services 100 persons 350 350 350 350 350 1,750
11. Waste Recycling and Marketting 6 groups 300 300
D. ComDev Reorientation & Strategic
Program
12. Introduction of geo-sosial-spatial 60 Village 1,667 720 737 3,124
planning instrument and method to Cadres65
strengthen Village Governments’ And 6 village
development planning capacity* communities
Sub-total (C+D) 4,117 1,070 1,087 350 350 6,974 491,126 GDE
1 External Monitoring Agency 500 500 35,211 GDE
TOTAL 10,369 5,330 2,611 550 550 19,410 GDE
Contingencies (10%) 1,037 533 261.1 55 55 1, 941 GDE
GRAND TOTAL (Rp. million) 11,405.9 5,863 2,872.1 605 605 21,351 GDE
GRAND TOTAL (US$) 803,232 412,887 202,261 42,606 42,606 1,503,592 GDE
Note: * Strategic livelihood security strengthening activities identified by this process (on an annual basis, from 2020 onwards) will be proposed for financing by
Dana Desa / APBDes (Village Development Funds) as well as annual GDE ComDev budgets. (Will include water supply system rehabilitation for 6 villages.)
65 VG – Village Government, LKMD (Lembaga Ketahanan Masyarkat Desa – Village Community Security Institution), BUMDes (Badan Usaha Milik Desa – Village Corp.)
69
70
XVI. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
A. Institutional Arrangements
133. GDE will be the Executing Agency (EA) for the project which responsible for overall
coordination, policy direction, and administration of project activities, including those related to
social safeguards. A Project Management Unit (PMU) has been established for managing both
the Patuha-2 and Dieng-2 expansion sub-projects. The Director of Operations will direct the PMU,
which will be headed by a General Manager (GM) with overall responsibility for day to day
management and supervision of the GPGP. The PMU will be the Implementing Agency (IA)..
Figure 11-1 presents the organizational structure of GDE and where the PMU sits within the
organisation. Within the PMU, the GM will be supported by an HSE and Safeguard Manager, who
will in turn be supported by a Government Relation and Social Safeguards Assistant Manager
with a Safeguards staff. The Government Relation and Social Safeguards Assistant Manager and
staff will be responsible for and will assist the HSE and Safeguard Manager with respect to social
safeguards compliance oversight, establishment of the LAT, activities assosciated with land
acquisition, livelihood restoration and ComDev reorientation activities.
134. The PMU will have a unit at field sites. A Social Safeguards and Public Relation (PR)
Supervisor will be designated at the Dieng Unit who will responsible for (i) supporting the
government relation and social safeguards assistant manager for the day-to-day implementation
and monitoring of safeguards plans, including implementation of the LRP, (ii) support the Land
Acquisition Team (LAT) in implementation of the whole land acquisition and land clearing
process, which will include facilitating consultations and disclosing information to affected
communities and APs; and (iii) supporting the functioning of the grievance redress mechanism.
The Social Safeguard and PR Supervisor will be a member of Grievance Redress Committee
coordinated by the GA and Finance Staff.
135. A land acquisition team (LAT) will be established by the PMU/GDE Headquarters office
for conducting the land acquisition process. The LAT will comprise members from relevant
divisions at GDE head-quarter level (GA), and Unit-level (HC/GA and PR), and representatives
from the Kabupaten Banjarnegara Land Office (KTR-BPN), the Camat of Batur’s office and Head
of Karang Tengah Village. The government relation and social safeguards assistant manager at
main office, and social safeguard and PR supervisor at the Dieng Unit will support this team, and
ensure that other related IR requirements are fulfilled.
136. The PMU will collaborate with the Pengawal, Pendamping dan Pembangunan Nasional
(TP4P) led by Attorney to ensure timely land acquisition. The GDE LAT will be responsible for
coordinating with the TP4P. The LAT will also collaborate with Banjarnegara District Land Office
(KATR/ BPN) to support the land acquisition process and update land ownership status.
137. A Project Management Consultant (PMC) will be recruited and will include an international
and a national Social Safeguards / Resettlement specialist (TOR for the consultants are in
Appendix 19). The consultants will support the Social Safeguards Assistant Manager, social
safeguard staff in Dieng, GDE’s Land Acquisition Team and CSR Division in the implementation
of land acquisition and involuntary resettlement activities, delivery of Livelihood Restoration
programs, ComDev Reorientation activities, and monitoring. The consultants will also support the
procurement of NGO/consultant services and be responsible for designing and conducting
capacity building training for staff handling social safeguards at GDE HQ and units (GDE Dieng
and GDE Patuha) prior to land acquisition and IR implementation. Training topics may include
71
current Indonesia legal framework and ADB SPS on social safeguards, meaningful consultations
and disclosure, income and livelihood restoration program, grievance redress mechanism, and
monitoring. Provision of technical guidance will continue during project implementation and most
importantly in relation to monitoring of compliance and success of efforts to ensure that AHs do
not become “worse off”.
138. Project contractor(s) will be responsible for handling project impacts during construction
including compensation for any damaged or lost assets set forth in the RP. This obligation needs
to be emphasized in the project contractor’s contract. The contractor will also be responsible to
receive and resolve grievances in collaboration with social safeguard staff at Dieng. The
contractor may be a member of the grievance redress committee responsible to resolve
complaints. The contractor will receive briefing on social safeguards or participate in social
safeguard capacity building training. Table 11-1 shows the roles and responsibilities related with
Resettlement Plan implementation.
71
72
Figure 18. Project Organisational Structure for Resettlement Plan Implementation

73
Table 22. Responsibilities concerning Resettlement Plan implementation
ENTITY RESPONSIBLITIES
Executing Agency ▪ Responsible for overall coordination, policy directions, and administration,
(GDE BOD) including those related to social safeguards
▪ Approval of RP
PMU ▪ Responsible for the day-to-day implementation of the Project and will be
accountable for technical, safeguards, and financial reporting
▪ Ensure proper GRM in place, and accessible to APs and local
communities in the sub-project area.
o Oversight of GRM operations.
▪ Establishment and management of the LAT.
▪ Recruit the Project Management Consultant (PMC) and the licensed
independent appraisal
▪ In coordination with GA,
o Oversight of the whole land acquisition process based on UU
No.2/2012, and Presidential Decree No. 71 / 2012, and
o Application for land use (pinjam pakai) process (IPPKH) from PT
Perum Perhutani based on Ministerial Decree of the Minister for
Environment and Forests No. P.27 / Menlhk / Setjen / Kum.1/7/2018
▪ Procurement and management of specialist NGO / consultant services for
development of geo-social-spatial information system for 6 Village
Governments, and production of a Development Partnership Road Map for
GDE Dieng and the local communities.
▪ Sumbmission of social safeguards semi annual monitoring reports to ADB
PMU Government ▪ Responsible for conducting internal social safeguards monitoring and
Relation and Social compliance, including implementaion of LRP and reoriented ComDev
Safeguards program activities and reporting
Assistant Manager ▪ Support the PMU to ensure proper GRM in place and accessible by AHs
under HSE and and communities in project area
Safeguard Manager o Coordinate with PMU concerning effective operation of the GRM.
▪ Support the PMU in the establishment of the LAT.
▪ In coordination with CORSEC, responsible for annual budgeting, budget
allocation and implementation of the livelihood restoration and
enhancement activities, CSR reorientation and strategic community
development activities.
▪ Support the PMU in the procurement and management of specialist NGO /
consultant services for development of geo-social-spatial information
system for 6 Village Governments, and production of a Development
Partnership Road Map for GDE Dieng and the local communities.
▪ Compilation and submission of social safeguards semi-annual monitoring
reports to the ADB
Social safeguards ▪ Support Government Relation and Social Safeguards Assistant Manager
and PR Supervisor for the day-to-day implementation and monitoring of safeguards plans,
at Dieng Unit including implementation of the LRP and ComDev Reorientation activities
▪ Support the GDE LAT in implementation of the whole land acquisition
process, including (i). providing information, facilitating consultations and
disclosing information to affected communities and APs, (ii) supporting
land clearing process including DMS, independent replacement cost
appraisal, compensation negotiations and compensation payment process
▪ Supporting the functioning of the grievance redress mechanism. The social
safeguard staff will be a member of Grievance Redress Committee
73
74
ENTITY RESPONSIBLITIES
coordinated by the GA and Finance StafThe social safeguard staff will be a
member of Grievance Redress Committee coordinated by the GA and
Finance Staf. She will be a
General Affairs (GA) ▪ Support PMU re: land acquisition process, and
▪ Forestry permit (pinjam pakai) process (IPPKH) from PT Perum Perhutani.
Corporate ▪ Annual planning, and budget allocation for GDE ComDev program.
Secretariat ▪ Relay grievances sent to info@geodipa.co.id to the PMU.
(CORSEC)
Project Management ▪ Supports the PMU in the management of monitoring and reporting on
Consultant (Social project compliance with its social safeguards obligations (set out as ADB
Safeguard/ loan covenants).
Resettlement
▪ Review and update safeguards documents, as needed.
▪
Specialist
Design and provide training to GDE /PMU Social Safeguards personnel
and the contractors on safeguards requirements as per ADB SPS 2009
and in how to bridge gaps between GOI laws and regulations and ADB
SPS.
▪ Support GDE/PMU in the preparation of semi-annual safeguards
monitoring reports for submission to ADB
▪ Provide training to GDE / PMU Social Safeguards personnel regarding
social safeguards requirements as per ABD SPS 2009.
▪ Support the PMU in the recruitment and management of:
a) facilitators to facilitate the identification and securing of alternative land
for AHs to lease / purchase after they receive their respective
compensation payments;
b) NGO facilitation services to support implementation of the LRP and
CDP.
Land Acquisition ▪ In coordination with the safeguards stafff at Dieng in conducting the whole
Team (LAT – ad land acquisition and resettlement process, including socialization and
hoc) 66 consultation, DMS, negotiation, and payment of compensation
▪ In collaboration with PMU HS Social and Enviroment Team in engagement
and liaison with government team and other related parties (e.g. the Public
Appraisal Office/ KJPP) during the land acquisition and resettlement
process
▪ Assist the independent appraisal during identification and inventory of
affected land and assets.
▪ Assist in handling complaints related to land acquisition process.
Contractors ▪ Manage project impacts during construction including provide
compensation for any damaged or lost assets set forth in the RP.
▪ In coordination with the Grievance Focal Person, resolve grievances
during construction period
▪ Report grievance receipt and resolution to the GRM Focal Person at Unit
level
▪ Forward grievances that cannot be resolved by the contractor to the
Grievance Focal Person
66 Comprises relevant divisions from GDE HQ (GA) and GDE Unit (HC/GA, PR) and
75
B. Capacity Building
139. In order to realize the implementation of the social safeguards planning documents, the
Social Safeguards/Resettlement Specialist under the PMC shall assist PMU for the RP update if
applicable, implementation, and provide capacity building training on social safeguards-related
tasks/activities. Training for GDE safeguards teams will be conducted prior to social safeguards
planning document full implementation – the first set should be before detailed measurement
surveys. Specific topics recommended for the training are.
i. Strengthen knowledge and awareness of stakeholders on provisions in the social
safeguards planning documents including ADB SPS 2009 on involuntary resettlement
ii. Requirements and procedure for RP Update as well as understanding use of the
detailed measurement survey instruments;
iii. Meaningful consultations and grievance handling.
iv. Orientation and finalization of detailed plans for livelihood restoration, plan for
compensation disbursement and its required documentation, and required
documentation for grievance handling.
v. Monitoring of resettlement development plan and reporting of compliance and
achievement of social safeguards objectives (that AHs do not become worse off).
140. The PMU, handling overall oversight for the project, shall retain adequate staff for handling
social safeguards with relevant qualifications and experience to be able to adequately design and
deliver the RP
C. Implementation Schedule for RP
141. The Dieng- 2 sub-project land acquisition implementation schedule is presented in Table
23.
Table 23. Land Acquisition Implementation Schedule

No. STEPS TIMELINE
A. PLANNING STAGE
1. Community Consultations (Sosialisasi, focus group March, May, Aug. Sept. 2019
discussions)
2. IOL, SES and independent Replacement Cost Study (RCS) Aug. 2019
3. Preparation of RP Aug. – Oct. 2019
4. ADB Review and Approval of RP Oct. – Nov. 2019
5. Disclosure of RP on ADB website Nov. 2019
B. IMPLEMENTATION STAGE
Land Clearing
6. Establishment of Land Clearing Team End of November 2019
7. Verification and Validation of affected asset refer to IOL 3rd week of Nov – 1st week
result prepare by ADB TA consultant of Dec 2019
8. Replacement cost assessment by independent appraisal 2nd -3rd week of Dec 2019
9. Negotiation with AHs Dec 2019-January 2020
10. Payment of compensation for loss of income allowance Jan - Feb 2020
Land Acquistion
11. Establishment of GDE Land Acquisition Team (LAT) January 2020
12. Spatial planning conformity March 2020
13. Socialisation and consultation with land owners regarding March 2020
willingness to sell land.
75
76
No. STEPS TIMELINE

14. Verification of land ownership data by LAT with KATR BPN April 2020
Banjarnegara
15. Independent appraisal of compensation for all affected April – May 2020
assets, and report completion
16. Negotiations to get agreement on amount of compensation June 2020
for land and affected crops.
17. Measurement of sub-project boundary by BPN. July - Aug 2020
18. Update RP document and submit to ADB April – June 2020
19. ADB Review and Approval of updated RP July 2020
20. Disclosure of updated RP Sept 2020
21. Compensation payment to affected land owners Sept.- October 2020
C. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT,
CSR REORIENTATION, AND STRATEGIC LIVELIHOOD
SECURITY ACTIVITES (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT)
(see Table 9-4)
22. Implementation of Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP) to From 2020 onwards in
address vulnerable and severely affected households parallel with construction
works.
23. Implementation of ComDev Reorientation Activities and new From 2020 onwards in
Strategic Livelihood Security Activities (Community parallel with LRP and
Development Plan to generate sub-project benefits) construction works.
D. MONITORING & EVALUATION
24. Semi annual monitoring and reporting periodic
25. External monitoring and reporting First study: In early 2021, 6
months - 1 year after
completion of compenstation
payments.
Second study: In 2023 after
completion of LRP
implementation.
XVII. MONITORING AND REPORTING
A. Internal Monitoring
142. The implementation of the RP will be monitored regularly to ensure that it is implemented
as planned and that mitigating measures designed to address adverse social impacts are
adequate and effective. The objectives of monitoring are to assess (i) the implementation
progress of the land acquisition and resettlement plan activities; and (ii) the impact of the plan
activities on income and livelihood of the affected persons, including vulnerable groups.67
143. GDE Headquarters has established a dedicated Project Management Unit (PMU) at the
Head Office to oversee project implementation; responsible for project management at
implementation as well as monitoring and reporting. Government relations and social safeguards
assistant manager under the PMU HSE and Safeguards Manager will be responsible for the
monitoring and reporting of social safeguards compliance and will be supported by the PMC. The
social safeguards and PR supervisor at Dieng will conduct day to day monitoring of the land
acquisition and land clearing process to ensure implementation is in accordance with the action
plan set forth in the RP, including LRP implementation.
144. Semi-annual monitoring reports will be prepared by the PMC in discussion and review by
government and social safeguards assistant manager of PMU. PMU General Manager is tasked
to submit semi-annual monitoring to ADB for review and disclosure. A semi-annual monitoring
report template is provided in Appendix 20 and will be attached in the Project Administration
Manual. Further monitoring will take place through ADB progress mission, mid-term reviews and
others events as may be proposed by ADB and agreed with GeoDipa.
145. The scope of monitoring includes but not limited to:

(i) Compensation payments to all APs in various categories have been completed,
according to the compensation policy described in the RP.
(ii) Delivery of livelihood restoration program and social support entitlements, includes
delivery of assistance to lease coordinators.
(iii) Public information dissemination and consultations procedures
(iv) Adherence to grievance procedures, and resolution of outstanding issues requiring
management’s attention
(v) The benefit provided from the project
(vi) Ability of AH’s to re-establish their livelihoods and living standards
(vii) Assess if RP activities achieved the intended objectives; measure resettlement outcomes
against baseline condition
67 ADB.2019. ADB Source Book on Involuntary Resettlement. 2013.
77
B. Internal Monitoring Indicators
146. Monitoring indicators adress the specific contents of the RP activities and entitlement
matrix. Potential monitoring indicators, from which specific indicators, can be developed and
refined as applicable to the pertinent social safeguard planning document, are set out in table 24.
Table 24. Suggested Internal Monitoring Parameters and Indicators
Monitoring parameters Suggested indicators

Consultation and • Consultations organized as scheduled including meetings, groups, and
Grievances community activities.
• Knowledge of entitlements by the APs (of women, men, and other vulnerable
groups).
• Use of the grievance redress mechanism by the APs (of women, men, and
other vulnerable groups).
• Information on the resolution of the grievances.  
• Information on the implementation of the social preparation phase.  
• Implementation of special measures for customary communities.
Communication and • Number of general meetings (for women, men, and other vulnerable groups).
Participation • Number of meetings exclusively with customary communities. 
• Percentage of women out of total participants.
• Number of meetings exclusively with women.
• Number of meetings exclusively with vulnerable groups.
• Number of meetings between hosts and the APs. 
• Level of participation in meetings (of customary communities, women, men,
and other vulnerable groups).
• Level and adequacy of information communicated. 
• Information disclosure. 
• Translation of information disclosed in the local languages.
Delivery of • Entitlements disbursed, compared with number and category of losses set
Entitlements out in the entitlement matrix.
• Disbursements against timelines.
• Identification of APs losing land temporarily, e.g. through soil disposal,
borrow pits, contractors’ camps, have been included.  
• Timely disbursements of the agreed transport costs, income substitution
support, and any resettlement allowances, according to schedule.  
• Provision of replacement land plots.  
• Quality of new plots and issuance of land titles.  
• Restoration of social infrastructure and services.  
• Progress on income and livelihood restoration activities being implemented
as set out in the income restoration plan.  
• Affected businesses receiving entitlements, including transfer and payments
for net losses resulting from lost business.  
Budget and Time • Social safeguards staff appointed and mobilized on schedule for field and
Frame office work.  
• Capacity building and training activities completed on schedule.  
• Achieving resettlement and customary community implementation activities
against the agreed implementation plan.  
• Funds allocation for resettlement-to-resettlement agencies on time.  
• Receipt of scheduled funds by resettlement offices.  
• Funds disbursement according to the RP/DDR  
Monitoring parameters Suggested indicators
• Social preparation phase as per schedule.  
• Land acquisition and occupation in time for implementation.  
Livelihood and Income • Number of APs under the rehabilitation programs (customary communities,
Restoration women, men, and vulnerable groups).  
• Number of APs who received vocational training (customary communities,
women, men, and vulnerable groups).  
• Types of training and number of participants in each program.  
• Number and percentage of APs covered under livelihood programs
(customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups).
• Number of APs who have restored their income and livelihood patterns
(customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups).  
• Number of new employment activities.  
• Extent of participation in rehabilitation programs.  
• Extent of participation in vocational training programs.  
• Degree of satisfaction with support received for livelihood programs.  
• Percentage of successful enterprises breaking even (customary
communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups).  
• Percentage of APs who improved their income (customary communities,
women, men, and vulnerable groups)  
• Percentage of APs who improved their standard of living (customary
communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups)  
• Number of APs with replacement agriculture land (customary communities,
women, men, and vulnerable groups)  
• Quantity of land owned/contracted by APs (customary communities, women,
men, and vulnerable groups)  
• Number of households with agricultural equipment  
• Number of households with livestock  
Benefit Monitoring • Noticeable changes in patterns of occupation, production, and resource use
compared to the pre-project situation.  
• Noticeable changes in income and expenditure patterns compared to the
pre-project situation.  
• Changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project situation.  
• Changes in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards.  
• Changes occurred on customary communities and other vulnerable groups
benefiting from the project.  
C. External Monitoring
147. The task of the External Monitoring Agency (EMA) will focus on the resettlement
compliance and assessment of the degree of rehabilitation achieved by the APs in the year
following RP implementation. Considering the high number of severely and vulernable APs and
the concerns of APs regarding project impacts to their livelihood, the PMU will hire a qualified
external monitoring agency to carry external monitoring and post-implementation evaluation. The
terms of reference (TOR) for this purpose is shown in Appendix 21. Both the TOR for the EMA
and the selection of the EMA will be referred to ADB for review. The EMA will conduct evaluation
study twice; (i) first monitoring conducted 6 months to 1 year after compensation payment; and
(ii) second monitoring after the LRP has completed.
148. The EMA will conduct the following activities;
79
i) Review the SES baseline data, and related indicators
ii) Verify and document of negotiated land acquisistion
iii) Assess the livelihood impact of the land acquisition/resettlement on the APs through
formal and informal surveys with the population in project areas affected and non-
affected. The assessment should be inclusive of gender concerns and ADB policy.
iv) Assess longer term satisfaction with the valuation of assets and entitlements, timing of
payments, fund availability and disbursements
v) Assess the involuntary resettlement safeguard compliance issues and if any significant
involuntary resettlement issues are identified, a corrective action plan will be prepared
to address such issues.
vi) Assess the long-term efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the land acquisition
/ resettlement program, drawing lessons for future resettlement policy formulation and
planning and future RP planning and implementation
vii) Preparation of the evaluation report based on the assessment and incorporate all
documents during the evaluation including meetings / interviews with the APs both men
and women, evaluation instruments, etc.
149. If the findings of the study indicate that the objectives of the RP have not been achieved,
the EMA will propose appropriate additional measures to help the severely affected APs
rehabilitate themselves to at least their pre-project situation. The EMA will likewise provide
recommendations for improving resettlement implementation in the future
Table 25. Suggested External Monitoring Indicators
Monitoring Indicators Basis for Indicators

1. Basic • Location
information on • Composition and structures, ages, education and skill levels
AP households • Gender of household head
• Ethnic affiliation
• Access to health, education, utilities and other social services
• Housing type
• Land use and other resource ownership patterns
• Occupation and employment patterns
• Income sources and levels
• Agricultural production data (for rural households)
• Participation in neighborhood or community groups
• Access to cultural sites and events
• Value of all assets forming entitlements and resettlement
entitlements
2. Benefit • What changes have occurred in terms of patterns of occupation,
Monitoring production, and resource use compared to the pre-project situation?
• What changes have occurred in income and expenditure patterns
compared to the pre-project situation?
• What have been the changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project
situation?
• Have APs’ incomes kept pace with these changes?
• What changes have taken place in key social and cultural parameters
relating to living standards?
3. Restoration of • Were valuations for all types of affected assets is based on replacement
Livelihoods cost principles
• Were compensation payments free of deduction for
depreciation, fees or transfer costs to the APs
• Were compensation payments sufficient to replace lost assets?
• Was sufficient replacement land available of suitable standard?
• Did income substitution allow for re-establish/restore livelihoods
and living standards/
• Were affected public facilities compensated or replaced
• Have vulnerable groups been provided income-earning
opportunities? Are these effective and sustainable?
• Do jobs provided restore pre-project income levels and living
standards?
4. Levels of AP • How much do APs know about resettlement procedures and
Satisfaction entitlements?
• Do APs know their entitlements?
• Do they know if these have been met?
• How much does the APs participate in the public consultation meetings to
discuss and reach agreements on project potential impacts,
compensation, assistance, and relocation?
• How do APs assess the extent to which their own living
standards and livelihood been restored?
• How much do APs know about grievance procedures and
conflict resolution procedures? How satisfied are those who
have used said mechanisms?
5. Effectiveness of • Were the APs and their assets correctly enumerated?
Resettlement • Were any land speculators assisted?
Planning • Was the time frame and budget sufficient to meet objectives?
• Were entitlements too generous?
• Were vulnerable groups identified and assisted?
• How did resettlement implementers deal with unforeseen
problems?
6. Other impacts • Were there unintended environmental impacts?
• Were there unintended impacts on employment or incomes?
• Were there any unintended impacts on Geodipa?
D. Reporting and Disclosure
150. GDE/PMU is required to prepare semi-annual internal monitoring reports for submission
to ADB. Internal monitoring reports are subject to review by ADB and posted on the ADB website
and project website, if applicable. PMU through the General Manager Project Dieng shall disclose
results of monitoring specifically to the affected communities/persons in summary form - status of
the social safeguards planning document, information on benefits sharing, and corrective action
plans, if any. Community disclosures will be in Bahasa Indonesia and posted at a location
commonly agreed with AHs and village leaders.
151. External monitroing and post evaluation reports will be submitted by EMA to the PMU, and
the PMU will submit the reports to ADB in english version for review. The final external monotoring
report and post evaluation report will be posted on the ADB and Project websites.
81
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Status of Land Certification of Geo Dipa-owned land required for the Dieng-2 sub-project.
Estimated
No Description of data for
Sub-Project Geodipa-owned land Date Process completion files
Details of land ownership (Type of ownership papers)
Component housing the sub- commenced of land
project component certification
process
1 Reactivation of Existing Wellpad 10 1. Inbreng Pertamina berupa Peta Situasi (Pad-10) 1. Q4 2019 1.Q4 2020 1.Proses sertipikat
Well 10A a. Peta situasi Pertamina (luas 37.580 m 2)
b. Peta situasi Pertamina (luas 31.700 m2)
2 Existing pipeline Existing ROW from 1. Inbreng Pertamina berupa Peta Situasi (Pad-10) 1. Q4 2019 1.Q4 2020 1. Proses sertipikat
route from Wellpad 10 to Wellpad a. Peta situasi Pertamina (luas 37.580 m 2)
Wellpad 10 to 7 b. Peta situasi Pertamina (luas 31.700 m 2)
Wellpad 7
2. WPS Sidolog 2. Final
a. Sertipikat HGB No.00003/Karangtengah (luas 725 m2) 2. Final 2.Final a. Sertipikat HGB-00003 sd. 2048
b. Sertipikat HGB No.00225/Kepakisan (luas 1.736 m2) b. Sertipikat HGB-00225 sd. 2045
3. Pad 29 to pad 7 (tie in) 3.Final 3. Final 3. Final

a. Sertipikat HGB No.00220/Karangtengah (luas 7.910 m2) a. Sertipikat HGB-00220 sd. 2045
b. Sertipikat HGB No.00222/Karangtengah (luas 1.435 m2) b. Sertipikat HGB-00222 sd. 2045
c. Sertipikat HGB No.00224/Karangtengah (luas 1.997 m2) c. Sertipikat HGB-00224 sd.2045
d. Sertipikat HGB No.00001/Kepakisan (luas 3.187 m2) d. Sertipikat HGB-00001 sd. 2045
e. Sertipikat HGB No.00002/Kepakisan (luas 548 m2) e. Sertipikat HGB-00002 sd. 2045
3 Drilling of new well In existing Wellpad 7 1. Sertifikat HGB No.00229/Karangtengah (luas 13.884 m2) 1.final 1.final 1. Sertifikat HGB-00229 sd. 2048
7D
4 Existing pipeline Existing ROW between 1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 1. Q1 2019 1. Q4 2019 1. Proses sertipikat
route from Wellpad 7 and Wellpad (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 14.390 m 2
Wellpad 7 to 9.
Wellpad 9 2. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya
(BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 12.625 m 2 2. Q1 2019 2. Q4 2019 2. Proses sertipikat
2
3. Sertifikat HGB No.00227/Karangtengah (luas 14.101 m ) 3.Final 3.Final 3. Sertifikat HGB-00227 sd. 2048
5 Drilling 4 new In existing Wellpad 9 1. Sertifikat HGB No.00227/Karangtengah (luas 14.101 m 2) 1.Final 1.Final 1. Sertifikat HGB-00227 sd. 2048
wells - 9C, 9D, 9E
and 9F.
6 Existing pipeline Existing ROW from tri- 1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 1. Q1 2019 1. Q4 2019 1.Proses sertipikat
route from tri- junction to Wellpad 30. (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 13.120 m2
junction to 2. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 2. Q1 2019 2. Q4 2019 2.Proses sertipikat
Wellpad 31 (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 13.790 m2
3. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 3. Q1 2019 3. Q4 2019 3.Proses sertipikat
(BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 14.390 m 2
7 Drilling of new well In existing wellpad 30. 1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 1. Q1 2019 1. Q4 2019 1. Proses sertipikat
30B (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 31.948 m2
8 Existing pipeline Existing ROW from 1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 1. Q1 2019 1. Q4 2019 1.proses sertipikat
from Wellpad 30 to Wellpad 30 to 31. (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 31.948 m2
Wellpad 31
Estimated
No Description of data for
Sub-Project Geodipa-owned land Date Process completion files
Details of land ownership (Type of ownership papers)
Component housing the sub- commenced of land
project component certification
process
2. Sertifikat HGB No.00223/Karangtengah (luas 6.733 m2) 2. Final 2. Final 2. Sertifikat HGB-00223 sd. 2045
3. Sertifikat HGB No.00221/Karangtengah (luas 322 m2) 3. Final 3. Final 3. Sertifikat HGB-00221 sd. 2045
4. Sertifikat HGB No.00004/Diengkulon (luas 4.910 m2) 4. Final 4. Final 4. Sertifikat HGB-00004 sd. 2045
7. Sertifikat HGB No.00630/Karangtengah (luas 12.000 m2) 7. Q3 2019 7. Q4 2020 7.Proses balik nama sertipikat
8. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 8. Q1 2019 8. Q4 2019 8.Proses sertipikasi
(BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 69.350 m2
9 Drilling of 2 new In existing Wellpad 31. 1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 1. Q1 2019 1. Q4 2019 1. Proses sertipikasi
wells – 31A and (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 69.350 m2
31B.
10 Construction of In existing Geodipa- 1. Sertifikat HGB No.217/Karangtengah (luas 11.477 m2) 1.Final 1.Final 1. Sertifikat HGB No.217 sd. 2034
Dieng-2 Power owned land (Mess 2. Sertifikat HGB No.218/Karangtengah (luas 47.851 m2) 2.Final 2.Final 2. Sertifikat HGB No.218 sd. 2034
Plant PLN)
11 Laying of In new ROW from 1. Sertifikat HGB No.217/Karangtengah (luas 11.477 m 2) 1.Final 1.Final 1. Sertifikat HGB No.217 sd. 2034
underground Dieng-2 Power Plant to 2. Sertifikat HGB No.218/Karangtengah (luas 47.851 m 2) 2.Final 2.Final 2. Sertifikat HGB No.218 sd.2034
transmission lines Wellpad 9, and then 3. Sertifikat HGB No.00227/Karangtengah (luas 14.101 m 2) 3.Final 3.Final 3. Sertifikat HGB No.00227 sd. 2048
from Dieng-2 along existing ROW to 4. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 4. Q1 2019 4. Q4 2019 4. Proses sertipikat
Power Plant via sub-station via Wellpad (BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 12.625 m 2
Wellpad 28 28 5. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 5. Q1 2019 5. Q4 2019 5. Proses sertipikat
(BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 14.390 m 2
6. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya 6. Q1 2019 6. Q4 2019 6. Proses sertipikat
9. Sertifikat HGB No.00630/Karangtengah (luas 12.000 m2) 9.Q3 2019 9.Q4 2020 9. Proses balik nama sertipikat
(BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 30.643 m2
11. IPPKH SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 (Perluasan lokasi pad 6 luas 11. IPPKH 11. IPPKH 11. SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 sd. 2037
740 m2)
(BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 7.597 m2
13. IPPKH SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 (Jalur Pipa Air luas 730 m2) 13.IPPKH 13.IPPKH 13. SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 sd. 2037
14. IPPKH SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 (PAD-1 roocmuffler luas 14.IPPKH 14.IPPKH 14. SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 sd.2037
21.958 m2)
15. Sertifikat HP No.00021/Sikunang (luas 55.688 m2) 15.Final 15.Final 15. Sertifikat HP No.00021 sd.2043
16. Sertifikat HGB No.00001/Sikunang (luas 10.683 m2) 16 Final 16.Final 16. Sertifikat HGB No.00001 sd.2024
SURAT PERJANIAN SEWA TANAH
(NOT FOR THE DISCLOSURE)
Appendix 3: INVENTORY OF LOSSES OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS (AHs)
INSTRUCTION: To be accomplished for

i) persons/households/clans/institutions that are affected by the entire or partial loss of their residential/agricultural
land/garden located within construction limit specified by GDE for the proposed Geothermal Facilities including the
transmission line and alternative road constructed for the project).;
ii) persons/households/ institutions that are losing their structures(i.e., house, waiting sheds, secondary structures) and
trees/crops/timbers
iii) those persons/households/ institutions that are losing a portion of or entirely things attached to the land and public
facilities (road, irrigation channels, electricity pole, water pipe and installation, schools, churches, mosques, etc);
iv) persons/households/clans/institutions that are losing other appraisable losses:
a. loss of or restricted access to forest area for hunting, fishing, and other livelihood
b. loss of business income, jobs, and change of profession
Survey Code: __________________
I. Location of the affected asset of the affected person (AP), affected household (AH), or organization
Name* of Occupant/Owner of the Affected Asset(s):
Mobile Number (optional):
Type of losses:
[ ] Loss of land [ ] loss of structures/buildings [ ] loss of trees/crops/timbers [ ] things attached to the land and public facilities [ ] above and underground
space [ ] other appraisable losses
Location of affected asset(s):
District: …………………………. Sub-district: …………………………. village/ Kampong: …………………………. Sub Kampong: ………………………….
RW/RT: …………………………., Coordinates :
To be used for the main project components:
[ ] well pad [ ] power plant [ ] access road [ ] transmision pipe [ ] transmission line [ ] Other: ………………………….
*NOTE: If a single-person household, write the name of the AP; if an AH, write the name of the head of the AH. A person who lives alone by himself/herself
is considered a single-person household.
.
II. Affected Assets (This section will be filled-out for all AHs affected by the loss of assets)
A.1 Land:
Area and Tenure Status Over the Affected Land
(indicate area of affected portion of the land [m²] in appropriate box below)
Right to Customary Occupying Total Area
Property construct right (adat, without of
Classification/
Right (Hak Management Leasehold on Right to use ulayat, or permission Occupied/
Use of Land*
Milik, Right (Hak (Hak Guna somebody land (Hak yasan) from land Owned
Certificate/ Pengelolaan Usaha) else’s land Pakai) owner Land (m²)
Girik) (Hak Guna
Bangunan)
1.
2.
*Examples of land classification or use: residential, commercial, farmland, forestland, institutional (e.g.., office, school, religious)
A.2 If renting or occupying the affected land with permission from the land owner (i.e., occupant holds leasing
agreement, a hak pengusahaan hutan,, , and hak pakai):
With Lease Agreement (Renting)
Check the box below if
Amount of rental fee Address/Location of Land Owner
Name of Land Owner not paying rent
(Indicate in Rp)
1.
2.
A.3. Information on other landholdings of the AP/AH that are not affected by the project:
1
Other land holdings but are not affected by the Project
Specifics
Residential Commercial Agricultural Production forest Pond
Tenure status*
Total area (m²)
*Specifics of tenure status: with sertifikat hak milik, hak guna usaha, hak guna bangunan,hak pakai, adat, ulayat, yasan
B.1 Main structures*

Structure Area (m²) of the State whether the structure will have to
Type or use of the Total area (m²) of
affected portion of be acquired/affected PARTIALLY or
affected main structure** Classification*** the Structure
the structure TOTALLY
*Main structures: Regardless of structural condition and construction materials used, these are buildings that are fixed on the ground with at least four
posts, with roof, and used as residence, shop or place of commerce, residence and shop at the same time, etc.
** Use of main structure: Examples are “house”, “shop”, “house-shop”.
***Specifics of classification: Use structure classification system of the local government (district or township).
B.2 Tenure status over the affected main structures:

Tenure (check the appropriate box below)
Main Structure Tenant/ Occupying WITH Occupying WITHOUT
Owner
Renter permission of owner permission of owner
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
B.3 If the affected house/store/building does not belong to the AP/AH:

Paying Rent? Check If Paying Rent, How much
1. Name of owner of affected main Address of owner of affected appropriate box below is Monthly Rent? (Indicate
structure main structure
No Yes in Rp)
[ ] [ ]
2. Does the tenant AH own a house/building elsewhere? [ ] No [ ] Yes, location:

_______________________________________________
C. Secondary structures*:
Total area (m²) / length (lm) of Affected area (m²) / length (lm)
Type of affected secondary structure Structure Classification**
the structure of the structure
1.
2.
3.
*Secondary structures: Structures that are not moveable and not part of the main structures, such as fence, driveway, waiting sheds, farm sheds,
irrigation canal, etc.
** Specifics of classification: Use structure classification system of the local government (district or township).
D. Type and number (count) of perennials on the affected land:
Name of perennial Young and not yet bearing Bearing fruit (within age of Bearing fruit (old)
fruit peak production
1.
2.
3.
4.
2
Total
E. Annual crops found on the affected land:

Name / type of annual crops* Actual area planted to the Net Yearly Income (Rp) Duration of Disruption Check
crop (m²) during IOL appropriate box)
Permanent Temporary
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
* Examples of annual crops: rice, corn, sugarcane, cassava, etc.
F. Type and count of timber trees found on the affected land:

Categories* of timber trees
Name of tree
A B C D
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Total
* Specifics of categories: Use categories of the kabupaten
G. Loss of business,job and income:

Duration of Disruption in Business
Paid Workers (if any)
Net Monthly Operation or Job
Nature of Business/Job
Income (Rp) Average Monthly Salary
Permanent Temporary Number
of Workers (Rp)
1.
2.
* Examples of business: motor vehicle repair shop, grocery store, eatery, etc.
** Permanent: No more space to re-organize the business. Therefore, it will stop operation permanently even after construction.
H. Sketch Map of plots of land owned / being cultivated within piece of land to be acquired
………………………….………………………….…………………………. ………………………….
Name and Signature/Thumb Print of AH or Representative Relationship with the AH
………………………….………………………….…………………………
Name and Signature of Enumerator Date accomplished: ………………………….
3
Sample of sketch map of each piece of land to be acquired, and label each parcel of land owned by the different affected land owners or land
users
4
Selamet
Existin
g pipe
line
POS
L=6241m2
Well Pad 9
Turmudi
Sugito (Hibah) L=772m2

L=4153m2
L=3261m2
L=1905m2
L=1587m2
L=834m2
L=617m2
L=293m2 L=267m2 L=227m2 A
L=4706m2
Remark :
= New Corridor Plan
PROJECT : REVISIONS
SUPPORT FOR INVENTORY OF LOSSES CENSUS NO. BY DATE DESCRI PTI ON
FOR DIENG GEOTHERMAL ENERGY DVELOPMENT PROJECT LAND ACQUISITION MAP

WONOSOBO & BANJARNEGARA DISTRICTS - CENTRAL JAVA
N
SCALE 1 : 1000
PT GEO DIPA ENERGY Cont act : Budi Gunarta
#24
Phone:
Em ail: budi.gunarta@yahoo.co.id
1
H M uhoyib
8
T urm udi
7
Abdul Syukur POS
KOLAM B
- 1
M uhoyib
24 B
KOLAM B
M arzuki
19
22 K om aludin
Siib (I bnu H adi)
B
17
3
N ga di Suk ur Darm int o
15
H arya di 12
M ardi
15 8
H arya di
T urm udi
11
21
Sart ono Sujit o
Sugito (Hibah)
L=4153m2
4 L=3261m2
Git o
Mes PLN 14
J uhari
L=1905m2
L=1587m2
L=58.479 m2
L=834m2
11 L=617m2
Sujit o
L=227m2
18 L=293m2 L=267m2
20 Soib
L=4706m2
2 T uyono/Am in
Selam et
10 5 6
23 13
Arifin Surono M int ono Y uniant o
B
9 M aht um
K huryadi
5
M int ono
PROJECT : REVISIONS
FOR DIENG GEOTHERMAL ENERGY DVELOPMENT PROJECT

DIENG-2 POWER PLANT
N
(LAND OF 24 TENANT FARMER)
PT GEO DIPA ENERGY NOT TO SCALE

Cont act : Budi Gunarta
#25
Phone:
TENANT FARMERS ON THE POWER PLANT PROPOSE AREA
No Name Adress Areas (m2)
1 H. Muhoyib Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara

3000
2 Selamet Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
2520
3 Darminto Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
2500
4 Sugito Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
2500
5 Mintono Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
2500
6 Yunianto Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
2500
7 Abdul Sukur Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
2500
8 Turmudi Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
2205
9 Khuryadi Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1800
10 Arifin Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1800
11 Sujito Dsn. Simpangan, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1800
12 Mardi Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1680
13 Mahtum Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1617
14 Juhari Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1617
15 Haryadi Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1320
16 Supyanto* Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1200
17 Ngadi Sukur Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1200
18 Soib Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1020
19 Komaludin Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1020
20 Amin Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
960
21 Sarta Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
840
22 Siib Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
840
23 Surono Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
640
24 Marzuki Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara
1875
TOTAL
40254
*Supyanto Sewa lahan di luar Mess PLN ( sebelah timur WP9 )

l
a spa
n
Jala
Jala Tanaman Kentang Pak Jarwo
n as
pal L=1236m2
Existi
ng pip pe line
eline t in g pi
L= 471m2 Exis
P AD e ntang
10
PAD
7
am an K
Tan
PROJECT : REVISIONS
FOR DIENG GEOTHERMAL ENERGY DVELOPMENT PROJECT MAP OF CROPPER IN PIPELINE ROW
(BETWEEN PAD10-PAD 7)
N
PT GEO DIPA ENERGY Scale 1 : 500 Cont act : Budi Gunarta

#31
Phone:
List of APs, Their Losses and Socio Economic Profile
Size of own
land Estimated loss
Size of land to Size of rented Monthly Monthly Monthly Montly
cultivated Size of other Estimate of from land
No. of family be acquired land to be income from income from income from income from Severely
NO. NAME AGE around own land monthly HH acquisition or Vulnerable ?
members by Project cleared by own land rented land farm labor other sources affected ?
corridor to to (m2) income (Rp.) land clearing
(m2) Project (m2) (Rp.) (Rp.) (Rp.) (wife) (Rp)
be acquired (%)
(m2)
Tenant Farmers (penyewa) of GDE land (mess PLN)
1 Hj. Muhoyib 58 4 50.000 3.000 200 juta 6% No No
2 Slamet 42 4 1.800 2.520 1.800.000 4.220.000 625.000 6.645.000 63,50% Yes No
3 Darminto 62 2 1.200 2.500 1.625.000 780.000 1.050.000 3.455.000 47% Yes elderly
4 Gito (Sugito) 38 6 1.600 2.500 1.250.000 800.000 600.000 2.650.000 47% Yes No
5 Mintono 62 2 2.500 3.000.000 1.500.000 4.500.000 100% Yes elderly + landless
6 Yunianto 50 4 2.000 2.500 2.625.000 5.000.000 7.625.000 65,60% Yes No
7 Abdul Sukur 36 4 1.250 2.500 454.000 908.000 500.000 1.862.000 48,80% Yes No
8 Turmudi 67 3 2.205 1.483.000 225.000 1.708.000 87% Yes elderly + landless

9 Khuryadi 42 5 1.800 718.000 600.000 1.318.000 47% Yes poor + landless
10 Arifin 36 4 900 1.800 825.000 3.540.000 450.000 4.815.000 72,70% Yes No
11 Sujito 55 4 1.800 3.375.000 120.000 3.495.000 100% Yes landless
12 Mardi 55 2 1.680 1.358.300 1.358.300 100% Yes landless
13 Mahtum 46 4 750 1.617 350.000 150.000 500.000 68% Yes poor
14 Juhari 37 5 1.250 1.617 676.000 875.000 1.551.000 56% Yes poor
15 Haryadi 46 3 5 parcels > land 1.320 11.500.000 3.500.000 15.000.000 23,30% Yes No
leased from
Geodipa
16 Supyanto* 45 3 1.500 1.200 1.500.000 1.875.000 3.375.000 55,60%
17 Ngadi Sukur 67 2 1.020 625.000 625.000 100% Yes elderly + landless

18 Soib 32 4 1.020 875.000 1.000.000 1.875.000 47% Yes landless
19 Komaludin 39 4 1.020 1.200.000 210.000 1.410.000 100% Yes landless
20 Amin 40 2 960 2.300.000 2.300.000 100% Yes landless
21 Sartono 54 4 840 2.000.000 1.000.000 3.000.000 100% Yes landless
22 Siib (Ibnu Hadi) 35 4 840 hutang 0 100% Yes poor + landless
23 Surono 39 3 3.100 640 3.000.000 500.000 350.000 3.850.000 13% Yes No
24 Marzuki 48 3 1.250 1.875 4.750.000 5.750.000 10.500.000 55% Yes No
Land Owners (land acquisition)
25 Tuyono 59 4 4.706 2.612 617 7.175.000 7.175.000 8% No No
26 Rudi Slamet 50 5 3.261 227 19.487.500 19.487.500 7% No No
27 Muh Hilal 38 6 1.587 267 3.425.000 1.000.000 4.425.000 17% Yes No
28 Budiyono 43 2 6.241 722 18.500.000 18.500.000 12% Yes No
29 Sugiyanto 48 4 1.905 2.450 293 4.206.250 3.000.000 7.206.250 7% No No
4 Sugito 38 6 4.153 1.600 834 1.250.000 800.000 600.000
Total (1) 106
Land user (no lease agreement)
30 Sujarwo NA NA NA NA 471 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA No
Four Coordinators of above-mentioned 24 tenant farmers

Note:
31 Nasrullah 7 Double counting of Sugito (as land owner as well as penyewa)
32 Salno 6
33 Ngun wan 4 4 cases where wives contribute to household income.
34 Mugiyono 4
Total (2) 21
Total no. of APs (1+2) 124
* Bpk Supyanto's data has been removed from the
Vulnerability Profile (at risk of impoverishment) analysis. While he was registered as a tenant farmer,
Severely affected 24 AHs 86 APs the IOL documented that he was cultivating land
Vulnerable 14 AHs 47 APs outside of the mess PLN site. This finding was also
poor 2 AHs 9 APs confirmed by the independent appraiser.
poor and landless 2 AHs 9 APs
landless 6 AHs 20 APs
elderly and landless 3 AHs 7 APs
elderly 1 AH 2 APs
Severely affected and 14 AHs 48 APs
vulnerable
Socio Economic Survey Questionnaire
INSTRUCTION: To be accomplished only for persons/households that are affected by the entire or partial loss of house, store,
and building located inside the Geothermal covered area, and those persons/households that are losing a portion of, or entirely,
their residential, commercial, agricultural, or forest lands. This form will NOT be filled up for APs (affected persons)/AHs
(affected households) that are affected ONLY by the partial or entire loss of secondary structures, such as fence, culvert
(driveway into the residence), wells, etc. This form will also not be filled up for organizations and institutions that are affected by
the loss of asset
I. Basic information about the head of the AH
1. Name: 2. Home address: Village/Township:
3. Gender: a. Male b. Female 4. Age:_________ 5. Physical condition: a. Normal b. Disabled
6. Civil status: a. Single b. Married c. Widow/Widower d. Divorced
7. Educational attainment: 8. Main livelihood activity of the head of AH:

a. ___________________________________________ (specify)
b. No work/looking for work c. Retired/not looking for work
9. Lenght stay at project area :........years 10. Length of using GDEs land (with or without permission) : ................(years)
II. Socioeconomic information on the AH
1. Number of persons presently living with the household: (specify number) ______
2. Basic information on persons presently and actually living with the AH:
Relationship with head Educational

Household member Age Gender Main Livelihood activity
of AH attainment
3. Average monthly income of the AH (combined from all members): Rp____________ 4. Average monthly savings: a. Rp_____________ b.
None
5. Income Calender ( Last 12 months )
Desecription LAST HARVEST (_____2019) PREVIOUS HARVEST PREVIOUS HARVEST TOTAL (per last 12 months)
(________ 2018) (_______2018)
Perennials
Annual Crops
Income (gross)
Harvest volume (quintalsl / ton)
Market price / kg
Total Income
Capital/Expenditure
Manure
Urea
Pesticide
Farm labor
Total Expenditure
Income (net)
Income as farm labor (if any)
Other income
2
6. Please estimate how much of the average monthly income of the AH goes to the following expense items (in Rp):
a. Food: _____ b. Clothing: _____ c. Health: _____ d. House maintenance: _____ e. Education: _____ f. Savings/investment:_____ g.
Agriculture expenditure _____
7. Health concerns:
a. Most common ailments (not-serious) that afflicted members of the AH the past one year:
i. ________________________________ ii. _______________________________ ii. __________________________________
b. Serious (acute) and chronic ailments of members of the AH the past year:
i. ________________________________ ii. _______________________________
c. For serious and chronic ailments that afflicted members of the AH the past year, did you go to a doctor, medical clinic, or hospital?
i. Yes
ii. No Why not? ___________________________________________
d. Where is the nearest medical clinic or hospital located from where you live? i. Same village/ward of the AH
ii. In another village/ward
iii. In the district/town center
8. Sanitation concerns:
a. Source(s) of water for drinking: i. Ground well belonging to the AH ii. Pump well belonging to the AH iii. Piped water from public
provider
iv. Public/neighbor’s open well v. Public/neighbor’s pump vi. River/canal
vii. Buy from retailers viii. Other (specify) ________________
b. Source(s) of water for washing: i. Ground well belonging to the AH ii. Pump well belonging to the AH iii. Piped water from public
provider
iv. Public/neighbor’s open well v. Public/neighbor’s pump vi. River/canal
vii. Buy from retailers viii. Other (specify) ________________
c. Toilet facility used by the AH: i. Simple water sealed (use pail for flushing) ii. Water sealed with flushing mechanism iii. Open pit
iv. Closed pit v. None
d. Bathing facility used by the AH: i. Enclosed bathroom in the house ii. Open bathing area beside the house iii. River/canal
e. Garbage disposal practice: i. Burry by the AH ii. Collected by local government iii. Throw indiscriminately anywhere
9. Main fuel/power used for lighting: i. Electricity from PLN ii. Kerosene iii. Rechargeable battery iv. Own generator
v. Other ___________
10.. Main fuel/power used for cooking: i. Electricity ii. Charcoal iii. LPG iv. Wood v. Other ___________
11. Ownership of home appliances: i. Television ii. Refrigerator iii. Radio/cassette recorder iv. Telephone/cellphone v. DVD/CD
player
vi. Oven/stove vii. Electric fan viii. Computer ix. Air conditioner
v. Others (specify)_____________________________________
12. Ownership of transportation i. Car ii. Pick-up iii. Truck iv. Motorcycle v. Bicycle vi. Other (specify) _____________ vii. None
13. Social Assistance Program have been received (Gov): : (i). Program Keluarga Harapan/Conditional Cash Transfers (ii). BPJS....(iii). Bedah
Rumah (Housing Stimulus Assistance) (iv). Rastra (v). BLTS (Conditional Cash Transfer), (vi) Other (specify) _____________ (vii). No
assistance
14. CSR from PT Geodipa : (i) No assistance (ii) Yes (Specify) _____________
3
III. Compensation Option
What kind of compensation expected : (a). Land (b). Other arable land to be leased (for sharecroppers)
(c). Cash compensation, (d). Business capital, (e). Training (sepcify) __________________________
(f). Other (specify) __________________________
IV. Public Participation and perception about the Project :

1. Are you aware of the proposed extenstion of geothermal facilities in your village?
a. Yes Where or how did you learn about the proposed project? __________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
b. No
2. What are your positive and/or negative views, if any, about extention of geothermal facilities in your village?
a. Positive:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. Negative:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. What are your suggestions, if any, on how to ensure that local residents will derive benefit from the Project, during the construction of the
extention of geothermal facilities and when the said facilities is already operational?
a.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
V. LIVELIHOOD SOURCES AND PROGAM

1. What are your main source of income :
a. Farming d. Run a small business (specify.............)r
b. Livestock farmer e. other, specify
c. Middleman
2. Does your income will be impacted by project?

a. Yes b. No, because.
3. If yes, in what way could the project help ?
a. Replacement of land to be leased
b. Training
c. No need help
d. Other, specify..............
4. What kind of training do you need?
a. Training to improve farming skills (agriculture cultivation improvement)
b. Training on livestock management skills
c. Training on processing of agriculture product
d. Training on processing of livestock product
e. Training on entrepreunership management
f. Other, specify
VI. Grievance redress:

1. If you have any complaint or concern regarding any aspect related to the proposed construction of geothermal faciloties that is partly located
in your village/ward, such as accuracy of the inventory of your affected assets; amount or level of compensation for your affected assets;
construction activities of the civil works contractor; etc.
a. To whom do you think your complaint or concern should be brought to? ______________________________________________
4
b. In what way should you bring forward your complaint or concern? b.1 Verbal b.2 Written
2. In the event that you are not satisfied with the action taken by the person or office where you first brought your complaint or concern, to
whom do you want to bring your complaint or concern next for appropriate action? _____________________________________
5
6
7
GUIDELINE INTERVIEW
A. Stakeholder
a) Profile
1. Nama
2. Usia
3. Tanggal Lahir
4. Lama Tinggal
5. Alamat
6. Pendidikan
b) Kegiatan Usaha
1. Jenis usaha
2. Proses / tahapan memulai usaha
 alasan pemilihan jenis usaha,
 Sumber dan besaran modal
 Jaringan (pasar, kemitraan, dll)
 capacity building
3. Pendapatan dan pengelolaan usaha  perputaran hasil usaha.
c) Usulan
1. Peluang dan potensi usaha di kawasan dieng
2. Peluang permodalan
3. Peluang jajaring dan kemitraan
----
B. FGD Penyewa dan penggarap lahan
C. FGD Istri Penyewa dan Penggarap Lahan
D. FGD Remaja dan kaum muda

Appendix 13: Focus Group Discussions Guidelines
General
What is a focus group discussion (FGD) ?
FGDs consist of a meeting of approximately 6 - 12 people who discuss questions asked by a facilitator.
Group members talk freely and spontaneously about certain guided topics. The purpose of a FGD is to
obtain in-depth information on perceptions and ideas from a group.
When should a FGD be used ?

FGDs can be useful to:
- gather perspectives of particular groups (e.g. women or men, young or old, wealthy or poor,
different ethnic groups).
- explore controversial topics and issues which are important to community members, which they
may feel more comfortable discussing in a group situation.
Limits to be aware of:

There a e less ti e to e plo e people’s pe spe ti es i depth. Loude oi es a do i ate uiete
ones. Facilitators should try to hear from everyone, and should also ask participants who are quiet what
they think. Note that FGDs are not always appropriate for sensitive topics.
Suggestions for selecting different FGD groups:
- FGD consisting of men
- FGD consisting of women
- FGD consisting of young people (gender separated or mixed)(between ages of approximately 15-
24. Note that under 18 years old is considered girl/boy.)
- FGD consisting of ethnic minorities / customary groups (komunitas adat)
FGDs should be conducted by at least two team members, with one person asking questions and one
person taking notes. This is so that the person conducting the FGD can have full concentration on the
discussions taking place during the FGD. The person taking notes should use a notepad and write down
the questions asked, followed by the responses from all participants. The note taker must make sure that
they record who provided the quote. If possible, audio tape the discussion so that it is easier to reflect
and go back to what has been said at a later date if necessary. If possible, take photos of any visual
materials used or created. The facilitator should note down any key observations that they have when
conducting the FGDs.
Objectives of this FGD is to discuss socio-economic characteristics and Project impacts on livelihoods
and livelihood options.
Facilitators should start by explaining who they are and what organisation they come from, followed by
the purpose of the meeting and the research. Advise the respondents that they will not be named when
writing the report (it is best if you do not even ask for the respondents names to ensure anonymity).
Introduction
My name is :
I work for :
An organisation based in:
We are conducting study ...... The Purpose of this study is.....
The note taker must record the following informatin at the start of each FGD:
- Date of FGD (dd/mm/yy)
- Time of FGD
- I te ie e ’s + ote take ’s names
- District
- Village
- Number of women (18 years of age or older, < 60 years) present at the FGD
- Number of men (18 years of age or older, < 60 years) at the FGD
- Number of girls (younger than 18 years old) present at the FGD
- Number of boys (younger than 18 years old) present at the FGD
- Number of people with disabilities present at the FGD
- Number of old people (60 years of age)
Income Restoration specific FGD Guide

Socio-Economy :
1. Do you know about the project? What do you think about it ?
2. How many persons in each household ? How many workers in each household ? What is the main
income ? (farming, trading, livestock, etc). How much average income ? How much monthly
expenditure ? What is the greatest categories ? (food, transportation, etc)
3. Averages size of landholdings ? Status of ownership (what type of land ownership papers ?)
4. For the land in the affected area. What is the propose of the land ? Who owns the land ? How
much area owned by each household (on average) ?
5. If it is for farming, who is involved in the farming activities ? (sawah, kebun, etc)
6. For trading, what is commonly traded ? how is it sold ?
7. For livestock, what kind of livestock ? how is it sold ? how much income from this ?
Gender Perpective (triangulation with information collected from gender FGS) :

8. What is the general attitude towards women in the community and is this changing?
9. Do women and marginalised people have equal access to resources and decision-making?
10. What are the key social concerns highlighted by respondents? How is this different for women
and men?
11. Ho does the la k of so ial esou es i ease people’s ul e a ilities (e.g. ho does it p e e t
them from protecting their lives and their livelihoods ?) How is this different for women and men?
12. Do women or men suffer from violence in this community?
Income Restoration Programme :
1. If you lose the affected land, will it have an impact to your income ? how big an impact ? ( < / >
10 % ?)
2. If yes, in what way could the project help ? Replacement land ?
3. For your livelihood, what do you think can be done by you and your family as income ?
4. Do you need specific knowledge or skills for that ? What kind of knowledge / skills / training do
you need ? how often?
5. Do you have a small business (UKM) ? What about financial management ?
6. What about capital ? Do you have access to capital ? In what way could the Project assist ?
7. Consultation re: Livelihood Restoration Menu of Options (to be finalized and provided by CSR
Division / EDF Consultant (DG)
Profile of Karang Tengah Village & Socio Economic Results
A. Profile of Karang Tengah Village
1. Figure A presents the village map of Karang Tengah.
Figure A: Map of Karang Tengah Village
2. The Village of Karang Tengah is located in the Kecamatan (sub-district) of Batur, in the
Kabupaten (Regency of District) of Banjarnegara in Central Java Province. The village is
located about 10 km from the capital of Kecamatan capital of Batur, and 52 km from the
Kabupaten capital of Banjarnegara. Geographically, Village of Karang Tengah is located at the
Dieng Plateau between Mount Pager Kandang and Mount Merdada. Village of Karang Tengah
is between 4 villages (Praten to the north, Kepakisan to the west, Dieng Kulon to the east, and
Bakal to the south). Access to Village of Karang Tengah is relativley easy (connected by roads
and good local transportation). The climate is tropical with two seasons - dry and rainy. The
temperature of Village of Karang Tengah is relatively cold, especially from late afternoon
onwards. At nights, temperature often fall below 10 degrees C.
3. Table 1 provides a profile of Karang Tengah Village.
1
Table 1: Profile of Karang Tengah Village
VILLAGE STATISTICS
Size of Village territory (wilayah desa) 488,811 Ha
Elevation above sea level 2,081 m
Average daily temperature ◦
15 C
Land Use:
 Dry land agriculture 250,831 Ha (51.3 %)
 Settlements 190,402 Ha (39 %)
 Home Gardens 2,331 Ha (0.5 %)
 Water bodies 20 Ha
 Village land (for cash) 28,138 Ha (5.8 %)
 Public Facilities 6 Ha
 Forest 9 Ha
 Total (488,811 Ha)
Number of Village Govt. personnel 11
Number of hamlets (dusun) 3
Number of tourist attractions (obyek wisata) 1
Number of homestays 5
Total population 4,992 people
Breakdown by gender 2,513 male,
2,479 female
Total number of households 1.400 HH
Number of people within productive age bracket (19 – 55 years 56 %
of age)
Dependency ratio 1 48.8%
Proportion of education who have completed schooling / 65.9 %
education
 proportion who have completed primary education only 52 %
(SD)
 proportion who have completed lower secondary school 7.8 %
(SLTP)
 proportion who have completed upper secondary school 5%
(SLTA)
 Diploma IV (Strata I) (35 people) 0.7 %
 Diploma I / II (11 people) 0.22 %
 Academy / Diploma III / Graduate (Sarjana Muda) (37 people) 0.74 %
1 (Population within 0-12 years age brackets + population 55 years and above) / (Population within 13
– 55 years of age brackets) x 100% (based on available data)
2
VILLAGE STATISTICS
 Did not complete basic education (primary school) 22 %
 No formal education / not yet of school going age 11.4 %
Main sectors of Economy / Income
 Agriculture (food / seasonal crops) Rp. 10,000,000,000
(99.55% )
 Agriculture (estate crops) Rp. 5,000,000
(0.05 %)
 Trade Rp. 31,200,000
(0.31%)
 Services Rp. 6,000,000
(0.06 %)
 Home-stay Rp. 3,000,000
(0.03 %)
Number of Ojek (motorcycle taxis) in village 17
Welfare
 Well off (Sejahtera 3+) n/a
 Poor (Pra-sejahtera) 305 HH
 Poor (Pra-sejahtera 1) 150 HH
 Very Poor (Pra-sejahtera 2) 153 HH
 Very Poor (Pra-sejahtera 3) n/a
Types of social organisations present – women’s groups, youth,
professional. men’s group, LP3M, Self-help groups, Traditional
groups
Women’s Organization’s (PKK) Programs – active
Demographic Aspects
4. The village population per 2018 was 4,992 (2,513 male, and 2,479 female) consisting
of 1,400 households. The number of people in the working age group (19-55 years) is relatively
high compared to other age groups. It is common for parents to involve boys from age 17 in
agricultural work.
5. The level of education of Karang Tengah’s population is considered low. More than
50% of the population has attended only up to primary or elementary school level. Some 11%
have no formal education, and 22% of the population did not complete their basic education
(primary school).
6. There are two primary schools (SD) and two kindergartens in Karang Tengah Village.
People who have graduated from primary school have to pursue secondary level and higher
education out of the village or the sub-district.
3
Agriculture, Environment, Economic, Social and Religious Aspects
7. Dieng society tends to be more progressive towards transformation compared to other
“zomia” areas in South-East Asia 2. Dieng has a history of in-migration and of progressing from
subsistence agriculture (corn) to a market economy (tobacco, cabbage and temperate
vegetables) over the last century. A potato boom occurred over the 1980-1990s. For the last
30 years, potato has become a very promising commodity for farmers - with high economic
value, and short cultivation cycle term (3 harvests/year).3 Since the 1980s, potato farming has
grown more extensive and intensive in Dieng. Farmers no longer observe a fallow period
common in highland agriculture. Declining productivity has caused potato farming to become
more expensive – cost of chemical fertilizers now account for 60% of production costs. The
heavily cultivated slopes in Dieng are prone to landslides as potato bunds are constructed in
the same direction as the slope (for drainage), and potato cannot thrive under shade, so there
are few trees planted to bind terrace countours. Due to erosion of top soil, manure is no longer
fertilizer but also planting medium. Price fluctuations and more frequent failed harvests have
made potato farming more risky and speculative. Farmers have become entrapped in a potato-
debt cycle over time they can only borrow if loan proceeds are applied to potato farming. The
above situation has contributed to the growth and sustains the formal banking and agro-
chemical industries in Dieng.4 According to Santoso, this has generated a dynamic of
accumulation in the hands of a few more resilient land owners-farmers, and dispossession and
out-migration of weaker and less competitive farmers.
8. The majority of Karang Tengah residents are potato farmers – a profession inhearited
from their predecessors. Other sources of income includes services (including home stays)
and the trade sector. Dieng Plateau including the Village of Karang Tengah is the biggest
potato producing area in Indonesia. Potato farming in Karang Tengah Village is supported by
the existence of Telaga Merdada (Merdada Lake) as the main source of water for potato
agriculture. Village data (2018) shows that some IDR 10 billion of village income derived from
the agricultural sector (Table 4-1).
9. The community of Karang Tengah Village is described as a religious one. The majority
of residents are Muslim. In one relatively small village, there are 19 places of worship - 3
mosques and 16 musholla (small neighbourhood places of worship). Religious activities are
regularly organized – neighbourhood Koran recitations on Thursday nights, praying for the
souls of the departed, celebration of main religious days of Islam and cultural rites such as
Sabtu Wage. Santoso notes that religious expression and rituals have become a source to
ameliorate tense relations within the community arising from competition and land disputes.
Sallehudin and Zakaria (2019) describe the phenomenon as the theologisation of agriculture.
2 Scott, J.C. 2009, https://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2010/03/zomia-james-scott-on-highland-

peoples.html
3 “Dieng. Perubahan Ekologi, Proses Produksi, dan Identitas”, presentation material prepared by Dr.
Hery Santoso for the SES Team, 13 August 2019.

4 Santoso, H. 2019. “Kejayaan Dan Ketersingkiran - Proses Diferensiasi Di Kalangan Petani Kentang
Di Dataran Tinggi Dieng”, and “Sebuah Dunia Baru - Pembentukan Relasi Kapitalis Dalam Proses
Produksi Kentang Di Dieng”
4
B. Socio-economic Census Methodology
9. Total number of affected households covered by the SES was 29 5. As such, a socio-
economic census rather than survey (SES)6 was conducted. The SEC included the following
data collection instruments:
i) SEC questionnaire;
ii) In-depth interviews with key informants (successful local business people in fields other
than potato-based agriculture);
iii) Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with all AHs, a sample of women (wives) from AHs,
and young working age people from AHs.
All data collection instruments prepared for the SES are provided in Appendix 10 of the RP.
10. As in the case of the IOL, the socio economic census was carried in two stages. Stage
1 was conducted with 24 tenant farmers of the proposed Dieng-2 power plant site (Mess GDE)
over 23 – 24 April 2019. The second SEC was carried out over the period 14 – 28 August
2019.
11. The first stage SES was conducted by two social safeguards consultants. The IOL
portion of the exercise was based on an aerial photograph of the GDE-owned Dieng-2 power
plant site and field check, followed by SEC interviews with the 24 tenant farmers conducted at
the house of Bpk. Nasrullah (the head of the 4 coordinators).
12. An SES contractor was mobilized to conduct the second stage of the SES. They mobilized
to Dieng on 14 August and completed their work by 23 August 2019. The SES team verified
the list with the respective Hamlet (Kepala Dusun) and Village Heads (Kepala Desa), and
conducted socio-economic interviews with all affected heads of households.
13. The SEC household interview was gender sensitive. 50% of all heads of household
were interviewed. 50 % of all wives were also interviewed for their perspectives. In-depth
interviews were also gender sensitive. Of the 7 people identified to be interviewed, two were
women entrepreneurs. In the case of the FGDs, there were four sessions (all conducted at the
GDE Dieng Unit office) :
i) The first FGD was held at 7 pm on 21 August 2019. It was originally targeted at young
working age people of the affected households. However, the Village Youth Group
(Karang Taruna) and various other member of the local community came.
ii) The second FGD was held at 3 pm on 22 August 2019. This was with wives and women
from all affected households. Wives/womenfolk from 21 affected household
participated.
iii) The third FGD was held at 4 pm on 23 August 2019. This was with 24 tenant farmers
(and 4 coordinators) who were leasing GDE-land (mess GDE). All attended.
5 The SES covered 28 AHs. One AH (cropper) was on pilgrimage (performing the Hajj) and could not
be interviewed. After the SES was completed, four (4) lease coordinators (who were not covered by the
SES) were subsequently deemed to be indirectly affected and should be addressed so as to reduce
economic and political risk. As such, they have been accounted for in Table 2-5 (Summary of impacts)
as well as Table 8-1 (Entitltment matrix).
6 The more familiar acronym SES will continue to be used even though the survey was a census.
5
iv) The fourth FGD was held at 7 pm on 23 August 2019. This was supposed to be with 6
land owners, but only 4 attended.
All attendance sheets are provided in Appendix 14 of the RP.
C. Socio-economic Census (SEC) Findings
14. The following section only presents all the tables and some graphs that were generated
by the SES team for the purpose of the RP.
Table 2: Educational Attainment of 28 Respondents
Percentage Number Last Educational Level Total % Number of Percentage

(%) of males of males females (%) of females
7.1 2 Never Attended School 4 14.2 2 7.1
17.9 5 Primary or Elementary School / 15 53.6 10 35.7
Islamic Primary School /
Equivalent (SD)
3.6 1 Lower Secondary School / 2 7.2 1 3.6
Islamic Lower Secondary School
/ Equivalen (SLTP)
21.4 6 Upper Secondary School ) 7 25 1 2.6
Islamic Upper Secondary School
/ Equivalent (SLTA)
50 14 TOTAL 28 100 14 50
Table 3: Educational Attainment of AH members
Percentage Number Last Educational Level Total % Number of Percentage

(%) of males of males females (%) of females
6.3 6 Never Attended School 12 12.7 6 6.3
33.8 33 Primary or Elementary School / 50 52.7 17 17.9
Islamic Primary School /
Equivalent (SD)
7.3 7 Lower Secondary School / 13 13.8 6 6.4
Islamic Lower Secondary School
/ Equivalen (SLTP)
3.3 3 Upper Secondary School ) 13 13.8 10 10.6
Islamic Upper Secondary School
/ Equivalent (SLTA)
2.1 2 Vocational School 2 2.1 0 0
1.1 1 Non-degree 2 2.2 1 1.1
1.1 1 University 3 3.2 2 2.1
55.8 53 TOTAL 95 100 42 44.2
Note * Information was not collected (answers not provided) in the case of 11 AH members.
Table 4: Land Ownership (based on IOL census)
6
Own 0.1 – Own 0.26 0.51 –
Own < 0.1 > 0.75 ha landless Total
Size of land 0.25 ha – 0.5 ha 0.75 ha
owned
n % n % n % n % n % n % n %
Responses from 28 Heads of AHs.
Male-headed 3 10.7 9 32.1 3 10.7 1 3.6 1 3.6 11 39.3 28 100
Female-headed
Figure B: Size of land owned by landed AHs
Land Ownership (based on IOL census)
10,7%
Own < 0.1 ha
Own 0.1 – 0.25 ha
39,3%
Own 0.26 – 0.5 ha
32,1% 0.51 – 0.75 ha
0.75 – 1 ha
landless
10,7%
3,6%
3,6%
Table 5: Status of Land Tenure (based on IOL census)
Land owner
Land owner Land owner
Gender of AH with land Land owner Landless
with Akte withSPPT
Head certificate
n % n % n % n % n %
Responses from 28 heads of affected households
Male-headed 4 26.7 1 6.7 10 66.6 15 53.6 13 46.4
Female-headed
7
Figure C: Status of Land Tenure (based on IOL census)
Status of Land Tenure

60,7%
Percentage (%)
39,3%
35,7%
10,7%
3,6%
Land owner with Land owner with Land owner Land owner Landless
land certificate Akte withSPPT
Table 6A: Primary occupation of affected household members

Gender No,
Farm
of AH Attending Farmer Trader Retired Other Total
workers
Head School
n % n % n % n % n % n % n %
Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)
Male 7 7.8 17 18.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.1 1 1.1 26 28.9
Female 3 3.3 11 12.2 1 1.1 1 1.1 1 1.1 4 4.4 21 23.3
Responses of 14 male heads of AHs
Male 5 5.6 19 21.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.1 0 0.0 25 27.8
Female 3 3.3 11 12.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.1 3 3.3 18 20.0
Total 18 20 58 64.4 1 1.1 1 1.1 4 4.4 8 8.8 90 100
Note: * Occupations of 15 household members were not documented.
Table 6B: Primary occupation of affected household members (same data, condensed)
Gender No,
Farm
of AH Attending Farmer Trader Retired Other Total
workers
member School
n % n % n % n % n % n % n %
Male 12 13.5 36 40.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 2.2 1 1.1 51 57.3
Female 6 6.7 21 23.6 1 1.1 1 1.1 2 2.2 7 7.9 38 42.7

Total 18 20.2 58 64.0 1 1.1 1 1.1 4 4.5 8 9.0 89 100.0
8
Table 7: Number of gainfully employed AH members
Number of gainfully employed members of the AH

Gender of Male** Female**
<2 2 3 4 Total
Respondent
n % n % n % n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 2 7.1 9 32.1 1 3.6 2 7.1 14 50 18 26.9 17 25.4
Male-headed 3 10.7 7 25.0 3 10.7 1 3.6 14 50 19 28.3 13 19.4

Total (n) 5 17.8 16 37.1 4 14.3 3 10.7 28 100 37 55.2 30 44.8
Note: There were no female-headed households.
Table 8: Dependency Ratio
Number of HH No. of HH members No. of working

Name members not working HH members Dependency Ratio
Khotiyah 4 0 4 0.0
Sopinah 4 0 4 0.0
Tusiah 4 2 2 1.0
Siti Hayinah 6 4 2 2.0
Parinem 2 0 2 0.0
Yunianto 4 0 4 0.0
Haryati 4 3 1 3.0
Turmudi 3 1 2 0.5
Khuryadi 5 3 2 1.5
Arifin 4 2 2 1.0
Surati 4 0 4 0.0
Fatminah 2 1 1 1.0
Mahtum 4 2 2 1.0
Juhari 5 2 3 0.7
Hariadi 3 0 3 0.0
Ngadi Sukur 2 1 1 1.0
Soib 4 2 2 1.0
Mistini 4 2 2 1.0
Amin 2 0 2 0.0
Boniah 4 1 3 0.3
Ibnu Hadi 4 2 2 1.0
Maryatul 3 1 2 0.5
Marzuki 3 0 3 0.0
Tuyono 4 0 4 0.0
Siti Alwiyah 5 1 4 0.3
Mistilah 6 4 2 2.0
Budiyono 2 1 1 1.0
Tumiyati 4 2 2 1.0
9
Table 9: Monthly Income
Above
Gender of 400,000~ 2,000,001~ 4,000,001~ 5,000,001~ 7000,001~
<400,000 poverty Total
AH Head poverty line 4000000 5000000 7000000 above
line~2,000,000
Male-headed 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 2 10 6 30
Female-
headed
Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs
Male-headed 1 5 2 10 4 20 1 5 1 5 0 0 5 25 14 70
Female-
headed
Total 1 5 2 10 5 25 2 10 2 10 1 5 7 35 20 100
Note: * NA in the case of 8 wives.
Table 10: Combined monthly households Savings
Above
400,000~poverty
Gender of AH <400,000 poverty line 2,000,001~4000000 Total
line (Rp. 278,210,-)
Head - 2,000,000
n % n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 0 0 0 0 0
Female-headed
Male-headed 1 25 0 0 2 50 1 25 4 100
Female-headed
Total 1 25 0 0 2 50 1 25 4 100
Table 11: Number of cars owned
Gender of AH 0 1 2 3 Total
Head n % n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 10 35.7 2 7.1 0 0.0 2 7.1 14 50.0
Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Male-headed 12 42.9 2 7.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 14 50.0
Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total (n) 22 78.6 4 14.2 0 0 2 7.1 28 100.0
Table 12: Number of motorcycles owned
Gender of AH 0 1 2 Total
Head n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 1 3.6 7 25.0 6 21.4 14 50.0
10
Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Male-headed 8 28.6 6 21.4 0 0.0 14 50.0
Total (n) 9 32.2 13 46.4 6 21.4 28 100
Table 13: Number of bicycles owned
Gender of AH 0 1 Total
Head n % n % n %
Male-headed 14 50.0 0 0.0 14 50.0
Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0
Male-headed 11 39.3 3 10.7 14 50.0
Total (n) 25 89.3 3 10.7 28 100.0
Figure D: Types and Number of Vehicles owned by AHs (combined data)
Ownership of vehicles
3,6% 3,6%
3,6%
21,4%
10,7%
0,0%
3,6%
10,7%
42,9%
own no vehicles own 1 or more bicycle(s)

own 1 motorcyle + 0 or >0 bicycles own 2 motorcycles + 0 or >0 bicycles
own 1 car only own 1 car + motorcycle(s)
own 2 cars + motorcycles / bicycles own 3 cars
own 4 cars
11
Tables 14 and 15: Summary of common and serious ailments suffered by AH members
Common Ailments No. of people % Serious Ilnesses No. of people %

Cough and cold 7 62.9 Stroke 1 20
Headache 4 14.8 Limp 1 20
Indigestion 3 11 Bone abnormality 1 20
Colds / Flu 2 7.4 Asthma 1 20
Sprain 1 3.7 Heart disease 1 20
27 100 5 100
Figure E: Common Ailments of APs
Common Ailments
4%
7%
11%
15%
63%
Cough & cold Headache Indigestion Colds Sprain
Figure F: Serious Illnesses of APs.
Serious Illnesses
20% 20%
20% 20%
20%
Stroke Limp Prominent bone abnormalities Asthma Heart disease
12
Table 16: Location (proximity) of medical services in relation to AHs
Location of Medical Facilities from the Point of View of the Ahs

Gender of AH
In another village in In the district/town Total
Head Same village of the AH
the same sub-district center
n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 11 39.3 2 7.1 1 3.6 14 50.0

Male-headed 11 39.3 2 7.1 1 3.6 14 50.0
Total 22 78.6 4 14.2 2 7.2 28 100
Figure G: Location of medical services in relation to AHs
Location of medical services in relation to AHs
7%
14% Same village of the AH
In another village in the

same sub-district
In the district/town center
79%
Table 17: Source of water supply for household needs
Ground well Other Other Other Other

Gender of AH belonging to (Gunung (Telaga (Telaga (Telaga Total
Head the AH Prau) Merdada) Siterus) Pawuhan)
n % n % n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 0 0.0 7 25.0 2 7.1 14 50.0

Female-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
headed
Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 3 10.7 3 10.7 3 10.7 14 50.0
Female-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
headed
13
n % n % n % n % n % n %
Total 2 7.2 8 28.6 3 10.7 10 35.7 5 17.8 28 100
Table: 18: Garbage Diposal
Collected by
Buried by the Dump just
Gender of AH local Dump in river Burned by AH Total
AH anywhere
Head government
n % n % n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 4 14.3 1 3.6 2 7.1 2 7.1 5 17.9 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Male-headed 0 0 1 3.6 2 7.1 7 25.0 4 14.3 14 50.0
Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 4 14.3 2 7.1 4 14.3 9 32.1 9 32.2 28 100.0
Table 19: Location of medical services in relation to AHs
Location of Medical Facilities from the Point of View of the Ahs

Gender of AH
In another village in In the district/town Total
Head Same village of the AH
the same sub-district center
n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 11 39.3 2 7.1 1 3.6 14 50.0

Male-headed 11 39.3 2 7.1 1 3.6 14 50.0
Total 22 78.6 4 14.2 2 7.2 28 100
Table 20: Main source of potable water for AHs

n % n % n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 0 0.0 7 25.0 2 7.1 14 50.0

Female-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
headed
Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 3 10.7 3 10.7 3 10.7 14 50.0
14
Female-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
headed
Total 2 7.2 8 28.6 3 10.7 10 35.7 5 17.8 28 100
Table 21: Main Source of Water for Washing

n % n % n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 3 10.7 4 14.3 2 7.1 14 50.0

Female-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
headed
Male-headed 1 3.6 0 0.0 10 35.7 1 3.6 2 7.1 14 50.0
Female-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
headed
Total 2 7.2 4 14.3 13 46.4 5 17.9 4 14.2 28 100
Table 22: Toilet facilities

15. Toilet Facilities. All homes have
Simple water sealed toilet facilities. All use simple water
Gender of AH (use pail for flushing)
Head sealed toilets and use a pail for manual
n %
flushing.
Responses from 14 womens/wives of
affected housheolds (AHs)
Male-headed 14 50 16. Bathing Facilities. Most of AH
Female- homes of enclosed bathrooms in the
0 0
headed house. Only 2 AHs have a bathing area
Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs outside the house.
Male-headed 14 50
Female-
0 0
headed
Total 28 100
Table 23: Bathing Facilities
Simple water sealed (use pail Open bathing area

Total
Gender of AH Head for flushing) beside the house
n % n % n %
Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected
housheolds (AHs)
Male-headed 14 50 0 0 14 50
Male-headed 13 46 1 4 14 50
Total (n) 27 96 1 4 28 100
15
Table: 24: Garbage Diposal
Collected by
Burry by the Dump just
Gender of AH local Dump in river Burned by AH Total
AH anywhere
Head government
n % n % n % n % n % n %
Male-headed 4 14.3 1 3.6 2 7.1 2 7.1 5 17.9 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Male-headed 0 0 1 3.6 2 7.1 7 25.0 4 14.3 14 50.0
Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 4 14.3 2 7.1 4 14.3 9 32.1 9 32.2 28 100.0
Table 4-25: Power Supply
Electricity from
public provider
17. Power supply. All AHs use
Gender of AH Head
n %
electricity supply provided by GDE.
Responses from 14 women / wives of
None of the AHs said they used diesel
affected housheolds (AHs) generators, rechargeable batteries or
Male-headed 14 50 kerosene.
Female-headed
Male-headed 14 50
Female-headed
Total 28 100
18. Main source of Fuel for Cooking. A majority of AHs use gas for cooking. Only 5 AHs
still use firewood.
Table 26: Source of fuel for cooking
LPG Wood Total

Gender of AH
n % n % n %
Responses from 14 women / wives of affected housheolds (AHs)
Male-headed 15 50 0 0 14 50
Female-headed
Male-headed 10 35.7 4 14.3 14 50
Female-headed
Total (n) 24 85.7 4 14.3 28 100
16
AHs’ Perception of the Proposed Sub-project
Table 27: AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion sub-project
Negative
Beneficial No Opinion Total
Respondent Impact
n % n % n % n %
14 heads of AHs 6 21.4 4 14.3 4 14.3 14 50
14 wives in AHs 0 0 8 28.6 6 21.4 14 50
28 respondents 6 21.4 12 42.9 10 35.7 28 100
Table 28: Other views concerning the sub-project
14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

Electricity 3 10.7 Will cause loss of 3 10.7
livelihood
No assistance 2 7.2 Will reduce HH income 2 7.2
Many roofs damaged 1 3.6 Noisy, not safe, crops 2 7.2
damaged.
Noisy, brine wastes 1 3.6 Afraid that there will be 1 3.6
leakages which will
damage crops.
Up to the community 1 3.6 As long as not noisy, 1 3.6
it’s alright
14 50 14 50
Table 29: Suggestions to ensure that benefits accrue to local communities

There is alternative land 1 3.6 Provided with / move to 4 14.3
made available replacement land.
Attention is given to 1 3.6 Provided with 1 3.6
tenant farmers alternative work
Total 14 50 Security is upheld 1 3.6
Project is handled well 1 3.6
Provide sosialisation to 1 3.6
the community
Up to Geodipa 1 3.6
Total 14 50
17
Table 30: Support for the Project
Support Do not support No Comment Total

Respondent
n % n % n % n %
14 male heads of
6 21.4 4 14.3 4 14.3 14 50
AHs
14 wives of AHs 1 3.6 13 46.4 0 0 14 50
28 respondents 7 25 17 60.7 4 14.3 28 100
Table 31: Reasons given for support / rejection of the Project
No comment 9 32.1 Will reduce husband’s 9 32.1

land / income / farming*
Up to the community 2 7.1 No comment 3 10.7
Loss of land 1 3.6 Noise, steam causes 2 7.1
damage to potato
crops.*
Should be provided 1 3.6 Lose income as a farm 1 3.6
compensation for lost worker
land
Village become more 1 3.6 14 50
developed.
Total 14 50
Note * one response re: steam overlapped / also included impact on income.
Table 32: Best ways to mitigate negative impacts for local community
Ensure a distance between the 4 14.3 No comment 6 21.4

Project and residential area
(settlement) / build somewhere
elso
Compensation for affected 4 14.3 Alternative land for 4 14.3
people / compensation for farmers.
damages
No comment 4 14.3 Project should be out 2
of town, not at mess
GDE.
Improvement to Geodipa’s 1 3.6 Provide socialisation 2
development to the communities
Deal with the noise and 1 3.6 14 50
disturbance.
18
14 50
Table 33: Best way to communicate Project matters to community
Via Village Head and/or 11 39.3 At Village Meetings 14 50

religious leaders.
Via Geodipa officers 3 10.7
14 50
Table 34: Reasons for responses to Table 4-29

So everyone can hear 3 10.7 Meeting with tenant 3 10.7
directly from the source farmer group
Inform Village Head first, 2 7.2 Village will take 1 3.6
who will inform responsibility
community later.
Via coordinators 2 7.2 Among farmers 1 3.6
14 50 14 50
Table 35: Party to report complaints to or to seek clarification through.
Lease coordinator 7 25 Village Government 6 17.9

Village head 5 17.9 Coordinator 3 10.7
Direcly to Geodipa 2 7.2 Village Head 2 7.2
14 50 Village Head or 1 3.6
coordinator
Will follow what others 1 3.6
decide
No comment 1 3.6
14 50
19
Table 36: How would you seek for clarification of submit complaints ?
14 male Heads of AHs. F % 14 wives of AHs. f %
Verbally 13 46.4 Verbally 9 32.1

Written 1 3.6 No comment 5 17.9
14 50 14 50
Table 37: If you are still not satisfied, who will you approach for a solution ?
Coordinator 9 32.1 No comment 7 25

Village Head 2 7.2 Village Head 5 17.9
Have never complained 1 3.6 Coordinator 2 7.2
before
No comment 2 7.2 14 50
14 50
20
Appendix 12 : Assessment on Involuntary Resettlement Policy Gaps
GOI Laws: Law 2/2012,

Principles Implementing Regulations & ADB Policy Project Policy
Perpres 62/2018
Screening of the The legal framework lacks a stand-alone Screen the project early on Screen the sub-project to identify
project. screening requirement for involuntary to identify past, present, and involuntary resettlement impacts
resettlement impacts. There is no future involuntary and risks. Sub project triggers
explicit stipulation for conducting a resettlement involuntary resettlement and sub-
screening and assessment of impacts project with category A as per SPS
when land acquisition involves land will not be selected
purchase.
Meaningful The legal framework provides greater Pay attention to the needs of Meaningful consultation shall pay
consultation protection of human rights to children, vulnerable groups, attention to the vulnerable groups
the poor, and the disabled, also against especially those below the (the poor, the landless, the elderly,
discrimination to women. However, it poverty line, the landless, women and children, Indigenous
does not mandate to afford special the elderly, women and Peoples, and those without legal
attention to the needs of vulnerable children, Indigenous title to land). Ensure their
groups and to ensure their participation Peoples, and those without participation in consultations
in consultations. Some key groups may legal title to land, and ensure
not be considered as vulnerable (e.g., their participation in
women, the landless, and those without consultations.
legal title to land
Negotiated land A government regulation on negotiated Develop procedures in a Negotiated land acquisition shall be
acquisition settlement provides for a procedure to transparent, consistent, and undertaken in a transparent, free
implement direct purchase for parcels of equitable manner if land from intimidation, compensation at
land of 5ha and less; however eminent acquisition is through replacement cost. Independent
domain may still be triggered if negotiated settlement party shall be mobilized to ensure
negotiations fail. There may be no option that the negotiations are fair and
for an affected person to opt out from the transparent.
deal
Level of According to Law 2 of 2012, Compensation rate will be Compensation will cover all losses
compensation and compensation will be provided based on calculated at full set forth in the Law 2 of 2012.
bases of calculation valuation of independent appraiser that replacement cost to be
Depreciation of cover (i) land; (ii) over ground and determined by an The principle of full replacement
affected structure underground spaces; (iii) building; (iv) independent appraiser cost will be applied. In case of
value experienced in assessing
plants; (v) objects related to land and/or; involuntary resettlement, capital
vi) other appraisable loss such loss of acquired assets. For gains tax and the costs of
business, jobs, change of profession, involuntary resettlement, no transferring ownership, including the
and moving costs. deduction on taxes and cost of new land certificates, will not
administrative costs for be deducted from the compensation
Tax incentive is provided to: (a) person affected lands, as well as of those who will lose lands.
who supports the project; (b) person who depreciation in the value of
does not file a complaint related to the affected structure will be In case there will be deduction of
project location determination and/or applied. tax for negotiated land acquisition,
compensation. the deduction should be clearly
consulted and agreed by the
Law is silent on issue of application of affected persons.
depreciation when calculating
compensation for affected structures. Compensation at full replacement
Valuation standard set by Independent cost for affected structures will be
appraisers’ association (MAPPI, 2018) determined based on the
does not apply depreciation for physical replacement cost of a new building
Perpres 62/2018
condition of the affected building.1 For without any depreciation.2
affected buildings, MAPPI applies
solatium (emotional compensation) of
10% - 30% of the total compensation for
physical loss.
Compensation for Perpres 62/2018 stipulated that Compensation for affected Compensation for
land users (tenant compensation should consider the cost land and non-land assets sharecroppers be provided based
farmers / croppers / of mobilization, cost for moving, house should be provided at on losses at replacement cost.
sharecroppers) rent during the transition period, and loss replacement cost
of income according to valuation by
independent appraisal
Law 2/2012 and its elucidation, 71/2012

stipulate that owners of trees/plans are
entitled for compensation of affected
trees/plants.
Compensation and The legal framework provides Ensure displaced persons The principle to provide
assistance to compensation and assistance for without titles or any compensation for non-land assets
displaced persons displaced persons without tittle or any recognizable legal rights to at replacement cost will be applied.
without legal title or recognizable legal rights to land unless land are eligible for
any recognizable their legitimate claims cannot be resettlement assistance Assistance in the form of livelihood
legal rights proven/recognized prior to land LAR and compensation at restoration and relocation
implementation. However, application replacement cost for loss of assistance will be provided
of full replacement cost for people non-land assets
utilizing land has been owned by the
agency needing the land is unclear.
Assistance to non- Article 36 of Perpres 71 of 2012 Physically and Assistance in the form of income
land rights holders indicates the task of appraiser to carry Economically displaced restoration will be provided
Transitional support out the appraisal of the amount of persons are provided Transitional support and
compensation which includes: a. Land; transitional support and development assistance will be
b. Space above and below the surface development assistance, included in the total cost born by
of the land; c. Buildings; d. Plants; e. such as land development, displaced persons. Institution
Objects related to the land; and/or f. credit facilities, training, or needing land can address this
Other appraisable loss” means non employment opportunities. through income restoration
physical loss equivalent to money measures or in the case of GDE,
value, for example, loss due to loss of through Community Development
business or job, cost of change of Program.
location, cost of change of profession,
and loss of value of the remaining
property.)
The law and regulations stipulate on

compensation for affected asset, yet do
not stipulate on the assistance to the
non-land rights holders and other
economic loss.
1 Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 204). Land Acquisition Assessment for Development for the Public Interest. Code of
Ethics Indonesia Appraisers and Indonesia Standard, 2018, Jakarta

2
Compensation will be based on i) the market value; ii) transaction costs; iii) accrued interest; iv) transition costs and repairs; v)
other applicable payments.
Perpres 62/2018
There is no legal basis for additional
“transitional support/allowance”.
High Risk of  Not covered in new Land Law but Law Particular attention must be Income restoration / livelihood
Impoverishment No. 11/2009 on Social Welfare and its given to the needs of poor rehabilitation measures or program
implementing regulation. and vulnerable APs that face will be provided to severely affected
 Ministry of Social Welfare Decree No. the risk of further and vulnerable AHs.
39/2012 states: To cover or identify marginalization and
vulnerable / severely impacted people impoverishment. Severely affected household and
by the project as early as possible it other vulnerable groups will be
can be covered in Social Impact identified at resettlement planning
Assessment of AMDAL as referred in stage. Livelihood restoration
Environmental Law no. 32/2009 and assistance will be provided to them
other relevant Government Regulation through applicable GDE Corporate
on Environmental Permits. Social Responsibility programs.
Public disclosure Planning for land acquisition by the The draft and agreed social Pre-IOL and post-IOL consultations
Office of the Governor at preparation safeguard planning will be held with stakeholders and
stage and implementation of land document at TA, and the entitled parties. The approved social
acquisition by BPN will be carried out by draft and agreed updated safeguard planning document will
holding public meetings and social safeguard planning be disclosed to entitled parties and
consultations, and results of surveys and document at project other stakeholders in accessible
appraisal of affected assets will be implementation will be forms, languages and places, and
disclosed to the public. disclosed to the APs and posted on the ADB website.
other stakeholders in Monitoring reports during
accessible forms, languages implementation will likewise be
and places. The same will posted on the ADB website.
be posted on the ADB
website.
Monitoring at Project Land National Agency (BPN) carries out Monitor and assess English versions of social safeguard
Implementation the monitoring and evaluation towards involuntary resettlement planning document implementation
the control, ownership, utilization and outcomes, their impacts on M & E reports will be submitted to
benefits of the results of the Land the standards of living of the ADB and results posted on the
Acquisition for Development in the Public displaced persons, and ADB website
Interest. whether the objectives of the
BPN is only responsible in the monitoring RP has been achieved by
implementation phase and delivering taking into account the
result excluding planning and preparation baseline conditions and the
stages. results of involuntary
resettlement monitoring.
Disclose monitoring reports.
.
Consultation Reports
Geothermal Power Generation Project
Initial Consultation with Affected Persons, Communities, and Stakeholders
18-26 March: 2019
A. BACKGROUND
1. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide a loan to Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) to
support expanded geothermal electricity generation in two locations in Patuha, West Java, and
Dieng in Central Java. The project will result in an additional generating capacity of 55 MW at the
existing Patuha geothermal plant in West Java and another 55 MW at the existing Dieng
geothermal plant in Central Java. The outcome of the project is increased adequacy and
sustainability of energy systems, while the project impacts are increased contribution to
geothermal energy in Indonesian power supply and renewable energy in electricity sector. The
project includes: (i) workover of existing wells and drilling of new wells; (ii) construction of fluid
collection and injection systems, 55/55 MW power plants, transmission interconnection systems;
(iii) enhanced corporate capacity, and (iv) enhanced livelihood of neighboring communities.
2. The project is categorized A both for environmental safeguard1 and resettlement

safeguard2 and category C (no impacts) for the Indigenous people or customary communities
following the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS). With the nature of project component and
activities, the project is classified some gender element. Due diligence on safeguards and gender
needs to be carried out and planning documents (Resettlement Plan and Social Audit,
Environment Impact Assessment) need to be prepared, in addition to Summary Poverty
Reduction and Social Strategy (SPRSS) and gender action plan (GAP).
3. The mission purposes is to conduct initial consultations with communities around the
projects areas, potential affected persons, and stakeholders on environmental and social
safeguards and gender for the two sub-projects (Patuha 2 and Dieng 2) under the proposed
PGSP. The combined consultations conducted in partnership with GDE will be part of the due
diligence and preparation of safeguards planning and gender action plan.
B. DISCUSSION AND MISSION FINDINGS
4. The initial consultations were conducted on 18 – 19 March 2019 for Patuha and on 20 –
22 March 2019 for Dieng. The consultations in Patuha were held in three villages (Villages of
Sugihmukti, Alamendah, and Panundaan) and 6 villages in Dieng (Villages of Pranten, Kepakisan,
Karang Tengah, Dieng Kulon, Bakal, and Sikunang). Consultations in Patuha were attended by
171 persons (132 (77%) male and 39 (23%) female), while in Dieng were attended by 183 persons
(139 (76%) male and 44 (24%)female). Participants included community members (that include
potential affected persons) living close to the project areas in affected 9 villages, representatives
of village government, community-based organizations (including PKK, Karang Taruna, Bumdes,
elderly groups), sub-district government, districts agencies (Social, environment, and BKSDA),
GDE Headquarters and regional units, the TA consultants, and ADB. In addition, several
1
A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are
irreversible, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to
physical works. An environmental impact assessment is required.
2 The project is considered category A for involuntary resettlement if the activities would severely affect 200 or more
persons defined as (I) being physically displaced, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive assets
interviews were also conducted with key informants that include land renters/users, village head,
communities members.
5. The consultations were co-chaired by GDE representatives and the ADB team, and
facilitated by EDF consultants. The consultations were started with the opening remarks from
Village Head, Sub district head and followed by a short explanation from GDE on the on going
project and the plan to expand the project (Patuha 2 and Dieng 2), short explanation from ADB
on ADB SPS safeguards principles and gender and the purpose of the consultations. and general
discussions. The consultations were followed up with the small group discussions focusing on
social safeguards, environmental safeguards, and gender. Several questions, concerns, and
suggestions were raised by participants covering the topics below.
6. Common issues arose in consultations across locations. Among them, many potentially
affected people (AP) requested information about how to contact GDE in case of a concern. This
highlights the urgent need for GDE to develop and communicate a process for gathering and
managing concerns from affected communities. ADB’s social and environmental safeguards
require a formalized grievance redress mechanism (GRM), and ADB consultants will work with
GDE to develop one through due diligence. GDE’s current approach at the Dieng facility is
summarized below, which is funded through the HSE operations budget for “incidents.”
Villagers with a complaint inform the local Kapala Desa  Kapala Desa sends a letter to GDE
 GDE checks the issue/impacted area to confirm and identifies a solution  GDE works with
the relevant government agency to calculate the damages  GDE and the Kapala Desa
negotiate a solution and compensation
7. It is unclear if the GDE unit maintains a record of complaints or how it is communicated back
to Jakarta
1. Patuha 2
8. Table 1 presents the number of people consulted and gender breakdown of participants
in each village.
Table 1. Participants of Consultations
Village 3 Sub-district Total no. of No and (%) of No and (%) of

(Kecamatan) participants male participants female participants
Sugihmukti Pasir Jambu 61 47 (77%) 14 (23%)
Alamendah Rancabali 51 45 (88%) 6 (12%)
Panundaan Ciwidey 59 40 (68%) 19 (32%)
Total 171 132 (77%) 39 (23%)
9. A brief context and main issues discussed during the consultations are presented in the
following section.
10. Social Safeguards. The proposed Patuha-2 expansion involves additional land for two
new wellpads, access roads, and pipeline lines (which may entail possible extension of steam
pipeline ROWs). There will also be drilling of 7 new wells in existing wellpads (which will not entail
3 All three villages are located in District of Bandung.

land acquisition).4 Land to be acquired or leased for project expansion components are located
in protected forest under the jurisdiction of PT Perhutani. The identified plots of land
(approximately 2 ha in size per plot) are reportedly unencumbered (no AKPS5 permits have been
issued). However, GDE and Perhutani will conduct a site reconnaissance on 23 March 2019 to
determine whether there is any undocumented use of forest land in the area identified for the
wellpads and access roads. Land required for new steam or injection lines will be leased from the
above mentioned GLCs.
11. The exact location of land to be acquired has yet to be finalized. As such, no maps or
indications of land to be acquired were shared at this stage of consultations. Only general
information regarding the proposed Patuha-2 expansion was given to the participants.
12. Key concerns raised by participants include:

 In general, this was the first occasion of public consultations for each village. The
response to the consultations were positive. Villagers requested that such
consultations be continued in the future as a mode of communication and information
sharing. Residents affirmed their support for the project (Patuha-2) and up-coming
project activities (further engagement/consultations, surveys etc.).
 Participants felt that their livelihoods had not been affected by the presence of the
Patuha -1 facility in their area. Therefore, no specific concerns were raised regarding
potential negative impacts of Patuha-2 on their livelihoods.
 While a number of participants articulated that they did not quite know what GDE was,
and whom its operations were meant to benefit, participants in general affirmed that
they have received some direct benefits in the form of GDE’s on-going CSR
programs.6 However, participants also articulated a list of complaints.7 Participants
took advantage of the forum to request various kinds of assistance from GDE.
 In general, there was a sentiment that if GDE progresses, surrounding communities
(wellbeing) should also be able to progress in tandem. (GDE maju, masyarakat maju.).
In comparison, there was a difference in the disposition of the respective village
communities towards GDE.8 Participants of the Panundaan Village consultation
conveyed a generally more positive disposition towards GDE in terms of collaboration
/ partnership in enhancing the village’s fortunes.
13. Environmental safeguards. Key concerns raised by participants include:

 Vibration and noise resulting during the mobilization/demobilization of heavy
equipment and rigs to/from the Patuha project site via the village access roads at night
time period (11 PM – 4AM). This has resulted in that few houses were reported to
have their walls cracked and instances where their fences hit by the hauler long-trucks.
 Airborne dust generated due to the daily traffic on the village access road to Patuha
site via these villages, particularly during the dry season.
4 All land acquired for Patuha-1 in the 1980s was land that belonged to two Government-linked corporations (PT
Perkebunan ________, and PT Perhutani). were acquired whereas land required for pipelines were leased on 10
year basis.
5 Akses kelola perhutanan sosial (AKPS) is a permit issued to communities / farmer groups to engage in social
forestry on PT Perhutani managed forest.

6 Road construction, training provided to women’s groups, assistance with developing local tourism activities.
7 disturbances and damage caused by the regular passage of heavy vehicles in and out of the Patuha site,
insufficient absorption of local manpower by GDE, and various other issues eg. incomplete status of road
construction assistance (1.2 km) in Alamendah Village (documented in the Consultations Report).
8 See also results of the recent social mapping exercise by GDE.
 Surface water availability (spring and stream) used for watering the commodity crops
(i.e. potato, tomato and vegetables) reduces during the dry seasons. The community
is curious whether this water reduction may be attributable to GDE operations and its
future expansion requiring forest clearing. Further, the community also speculates
whether the water they used for watering the vegetable crops has been impacted as
the yield of those crops is reducing over time.
 The community safety may be at risk during the construction phase due to
mobilization/demobilization of heavy equipment and increased road traffic of project
vehicles.
 Bird poaching from the nearby protection forest was revealed in personal discussion
with few community members and the personnel from the local Perhutani office (stated
owned forestry company managing the protection forest). This activity is conducted by
some community members either as a hobby or occasional source of income instead
of the direct impact due to GDE operation.
 The representatives from Panundaan ask how GDE will manage its construction
wastes. Solid waste management in this village and others are reportedly lacking
associated facilities and services from the local governments. They are concerned that
if the construction waste are not well managed, it would impact to the ongoing waste
management issues at Panudaan village, which is well known for its tourism and
nature based recreational activities.
14. Gender. Local community, including women were interested to join the initial public
consultation as they wanted to receive information about GDE community development program,
environment issues, and other latest information. Women participants in consultations composed
approximately 10% women in the morning sessions and 50% women in afternoon sessions. Thus,
future public consultation should consider convenient time for women.
 Access to Information: Women villagers are usually not invited to village community
meeting. Village office usually invite the PKK committees or representatives. Thus,
only small number or women attend general village meeting. Main available local
women organizations are PKK (Family Welfare) and Koran chanting group
(pengajian). These organizations have regular meeting and serve as channel to
disseminate information on various issues. Information from GDE (including on
employment opportunities, community development programs, etc.) could make use
of these channels.
 Time Spent: Both men and women work morning from morning to noon. Men usually
go to the field, while women villagers do multiple tasks (go to the field, take care of
children and other domestic chores). In villages with issues of clean water, women
have to collect water which may take 10 minutes to 3 hours (depending on distance,
and queue of people lining for water). Thus, women have more limitation to get
involved in public events such as community meetings.
 Consumption: Apart from food, a big portion of household income is spent on children’s
education. Since there are no high schools in the village, children have to commute
and require daily transportation of about Rp. 15.000 – Rp. 30.000. Other family may
spend around Rp. 1.500.000/month to cover accommodation and food for the children
living outside the village. With this context men hopes that GDE through community
development program provide a school bus, while women hope for high school to be
built in/near the village.
 Poverty: Poor households are found in all the villages visited. Social assistance
programs namely Family Hope Program, Rice for Welfare, health insurance, etc. have
been carried out in these villages up to 10 years back. However, only a couple of
people have got out of poverty not because they succeeded in running a business but
because their children managed to have education and find a job that could support
the family.
 Livelihood: Proportionately more men engage in paid work than do women. The most
common livelihood is agriculture (potato, carrots, onion, cabbage). Some women are
self-employed in micro business (homestay, catering, sell snacks, online shop, etc.)
and generally still face constraints in marketing their products/services. Women hope
that GDE could (i) provide more job opportunities for local people including women (ii)
provide community development programs that would support community livelihood
(training, mentoring, partnership as vendor).
2. Dieng 2
16. Table 2. presents the number of people consulted and gender breakdown of participants
in each village.
Table 2. Number of people consulted and gender breakdown of participants
Village Sub-district Regency Total no. of No and (%) of No and (%) of

(Kecamatan) (Kabupaten) participants male participants female
participants
Dieng Kulon Batur Banjarnegara 34 25 (74%) 9 (26%)
Kepakisan Batur Banjarnegara 20 10 (50%) 10 (50%)
Bakal Batur Banjarnegara 41 38 (93%) 3 (7%)
Karang Tengah Banjar Banjarnegara 38 28 (74%) 10 (26%)
Sikunang Kejajar Wonosobo 22 16 (73%) 6 (27%)
Pranten Bawang Batang 28 22 (79%) 6 (21%)
Total 183 139 (76%) 44 (24%)
17. The following section presents a brief context and main issues discussed during the
consultations.
18. Social Safeguards. A large portion of the land in the Dieng Plateau has been gazette as
heritage sites (Cagar Budaya), recognized by UNESCO and managed by the Provincial Tourism
Agency, as well as protected forest (hutan lindung, situs). Land on which the Dieng Geothermal
complex stands is owned by GDE9. The volcanic land in the Dieng Plateau is very arable. Potato
farming and temperate vegetable cultivation has grown very fast in the area and much of the area
outside the above areas has already been intensively cultivated and is privately owned. The area
is densely populated, and there is practically no unutilized land available. Land owning farmers
typically cultivate between 500 – 2,500 m2 of land, and also work as farm workers (buruh tani) on
larger neigbouring farms (onwed by locals as well as investors from outside the area). A large
number of farmers are landless and earn their daily income entirely as farm labourers.
19. The proposed Dieng-2 expansion will entail land acquisition for one new wellpad, access
road, pipelines, a transmission line and transmission road. Most of the land to be acquired is
privately owned. The transmission line will require land acquisition of privately owned land as well
as protection forest (hutan lindung) land under the jurisdiction of PT Perhutani. Approximately 3
out of 6 ha of land already owned by GDE on which the new power plant will be built, will also
9 The Dieng Geothermal Plant was originally built by PT Pertamina but was sold to GDE in 2002
have to be cleared of encumbrances (existing cultivation of land) which will trigger social
safeguards attention for lost livelihood opportunities among farm workers (buruh tani).
20. The exact location of land to be acquired has yet to be finalized. As such, no maps or
indications of land to be acquired were shared at this stage of consultations. Only general
information concerning the proposed Dieng-2 expansion was given to the participants by the
team.

 In general, this was the first occasion of public consultations for each village. The
response to the consultation was positive. Villagers requested that such consultations
be continued in the future as a mode of communication, information sharing,
consultations, and feedback regarding follow-up / resolution of issues raised. Villagers
affirmed their support for more regular engagement in the future.
 Residents have received some direct benefits in the form of GDE’s on-going CSR
programs. However, participants also articulated a list of complaints and took
advantage of the forum to request various kinds of further assistance from GDE.10
 Participants conveyed an aspiration for inclusive development - that the local
community should also progress as GDE progresses (GDE maju, masyarakat maju).
 Based on agreements made in the past with PT Pertamina, and continued by GDE 11,
unutilized land belonging to GDE was allowed to be cultivated by local farmers. In
some areas, farmers were allotted 200 m2 areas per person to cultivate.
- Farmers accept that this land must be vacated should GDE wish to utilize the
space. As such, they will not resist handing back the land to GDE. However, they
requested that they be informed in advance and be given a grace period of 1 year
(corresponding to two potato harvests) before relinquishing the occupied land.
- Consultation participants also indicated that they hope for GDE to provide them
with guidance / solutions regarding how to replace this loss in livelihoods.
 Participants in at least three villages (Dieng Kulon, Karang Tengah, and Sikunang)
were apprehensive about the prospect of land acquisition impacts and their livelihoods
and requested land replacement as the preferred form of compensation. If possible,
they requested that replacement land be larger than the land they lose. In some
villages (eg. Dieng Kulon), replacement land may not be available (demand far
exceeds supply) and asking about the possibility of compensation with GDE land.12
The possibility of providing cows as an income restoration option was raised. Cows
would mostly be tethered. These is ample fodder to be collected in the area.
 The 6 hectares of GDE’s land to be used for proposed power plants in Karang Tengah
Village is rented by 20 persons wit the rental cost amounting to Rp. 30 millions per
year paid to GDE’s cooperative.This rental fee is much lower than the normal rental
fee in Dieng. The total number of farm laborer is 30 persons. It is expected that
compensation and assistance will be provided to the loss of job and livelihood.
 The recent well blow-out and occasional leakage of steam caused some damage over
the last two years to crops and zinc roofs among settlements of Praten Hamlet- Dieng
close to and downwind of wellpad 30. GDE has paid compensation for lost crop and
provided corrugated zinc sheets to replace corroded zinc roofs. However, there have
been some complaints raised by residents regarding the adequacy of compensations
by GDE for the damaged crops and assets (delays of compensation payment;
10 See the full Consultations Report for details of participants’ perceived benefits, complaints, hopes and requests.
11 Managed by KODIPA (GDE’s cooperative body)
12 The total GDE’ land in Dieng is about 150 hectares consisting of 18 hectares of forestry land with land use permit
from Ministry of Forestry and 132 hectares of land owned by GDE.

compensation was only provided to farmers who have land ownership evidence/SKT,
while many affected persons who have no SKT and cultivate forestry land, no
compensation for corroded vehicles and doors and windows hinges). Some
participants requested that GDE to review and raise the quantum of compensation.
Residents claimed loss of planting period and income for 1 year and other damages
make many residents have to sell assets and engage in debt.
- Although not arising from direct resettlement impacts, this is an area of overlap
between environmental and social safeguards concerns. Livelihood related
remedial measures may be incorporated into the social safeguards provisions.
- A standard procedure for assessing and addressing similar impacts in the future
may also need to address income restoration considerations above and beyond
compensation.
 The case of a turbine explosion at the power plant in 2015 resulted in damage to the
roofs of residents' houses in Sikunang Village due to being crushed by fragments of
iron material. Iron fragments also fell on the residents' fields. There was no
compensation given by GDE and the residents did not demand compensation.
Complaint was also raised by Sikunang residents in connection with the installation of
steam and injection pipes which limited citizen access to agricultural land and resulted
in a decline in land prices.
22. Environmental Safeguards. Key concerns raised by participants include:

 All villages where consultations were conducted complained about the decline of water
quality since Dieng 1 was operating. Some spring water, especially those near drilling
wells, are no longer drinkable. The water smells of sulfur and salty and is getting salty
during the dry season. This caused the residents to look for other sources of water
that were suitable for drinking, which were located farther away from the village. Some
villages are forced to continue to use the contaminated spring water for drinking and
worry about the impact on their health. The residents in Sikuangan Village took their
own water sample to Gajahmada Univeristy (UGM) for analysis of contamination. They
claimed the results showed a positive test for sulfur content. GDE also took samples
in the area, but results showed negative.
 The residents and the district Environmental Agency propose to conduct water tests
in an accredited laboratory and be informed about the results openly to the residents.
GDE’s HSSE staff conducted several water quality tests and informed that there was
no impact on the Dieng 1 operation on water quality and the residents doubted about
the results.
 Two consulted villages complained pollution of wastewater from the Dieng 1 operation
to the spring water and the field located under the power plant or well which caused
the vegetable to die.
 All consulted villages complained about the steam blowing from the Dieng 1 well which
resulted in accelerating the corrosion of the zinc roofs as well as objects made of iron.
 The leakage of steam caused damages over the last two years to crops and zinc roofs
on settlements of Praten Hamlet close to wellpad 30. GDE has paid compensation for
lost crop and provided corrugated zinc sheets to replace corroded zinc roofs.
Residents claimed loss of planting period and income for 1 year and other damages
have made residents have to sell their assets and engaged in debt. The steam leaks
also caused the death of wood plants in the forests around the wellpad 30, which then
caused landslides in some parts of the protected forest hills. The residents also
claimed that the case of steam leak has also triggered the emergence of new steam
craters around the settlements, which will endanger the lives of the residents.
 The turbine explosion at the power plant in 2015 has resulted in damage to the roofs
of residents' houses in Sikunang Village due to being crushed by fragments of iron
material. Iron fragments also fell on the residents' fields. The residents were worried
that similar case will occur and asked the Gedipa to guarantee the safety of the
residents living near the project.
 A complaint was also raised by Sikunang residents in connection with the installation
of steam and injection pipes which limited their access to agricultural land and resulted
in a decline of the land prices. They requested to move the steam pipe installation. In
the past, at the start of construction, GDE said that the pipe installation was temporary
and would be moved. However, until now the pipe has never been moved.
 Sikunang residents actually wanted to demonstrate against various problems due to
Deng 1's operation, but they are worried about the security of their lives.
 Some residents and the Social Agency are worried about the beauty of Dieng due to
the many pipe installations. Dieng is a tourist area, the presence of large pipes in many
places certainly disturbs the beauty and might raise concerns by the tourists.
 When cleaning the waste pipe is done, often the waste spills on the roadside, while
the waste contains silica, and this certainly endangers the environment and the health
of the residents.
 Complaints from Karang Tengah’s residents against the installation of the steam pipe
that closed the drainage channel and caused water from the hill flow into the village
and cause flooding. Some villages complained that there was no temporary garbage
disposal in the village and hoped that GDE would help to build a temporary dumping
place and a car carrying garbage to a landfill.
 Two villages (Sikunang and Praten) complained about noise, especially at night from
power plants and hoped that GDE would reduce the noise.
 Vibration due to heavy vehicle passing needs attention. Also, the impact on road
conditions and security, especially children because the road passed by the heavy
vehicles is very narrow.
 Some residents stated that there is a possibility Javanese eagles in protected forests
near Dieng 1 and an impact study on this species is needed.
 Some residents in Sikuang are concerned about the existence of transmission line to
the community safety and fertility of the land under the ROW
 GDE is not friendly to the villagers and accepts workers from outside. It is only a few
communities work in GDE.
23. Suggestions and recommendation by participants to GDE are as follow;

 GDE together with the communities take the water and soil samples that were
suspected of being contaminated and bring the samples to the accredited / reputable
laboratories to get the accurate results and inform the results to the communities.
 GDE develop a complaint handling mechanism by: i) appointing active staff to visit
and to communicate with the residents as well as to record / receive complaints from
citizens to be conveyed to the GDE management for resolution; ii) There is a regular
meeting between GDE and the residents - as conducted in this safeguard
consultation for Dieng 2 - to discuss and resolve various issues faced by citizens
 GDE build a B3 waste disposal site with a good standard and a transport mean to the
landfills.
 GDE construct sidewalks, especially on residential areas, so that pedestrian security
is better maintained. GDE also needs to provide road safety funds because so far,
the residents have paid the contributions to people who carry out road safety,
especially near the schools.
 GDE provides an opportunity for affected villagers, especially the closest villages to work
in GDE even as unskilled laborers.
24. Gender. Key concerns raised by participants were similar between Patuha and Dieng,
and thus summarized previously.
25. Indigenous People Safeguards. The GDE staff at regions and communities confirmed
that no indigenous peoples living in the project areas.
Attachments:
Appendix 1: Detailed consultation records
Appendix 2 : List of participants
FFM: Stakeholder Consultation Reports
Geothermal Power Generation Project
Stakeholder 2nd consultation in Dieng and Patuha with affected people, communities, and
key stakeholders
9-17 September 2019
A. BACKGROUND
1. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide a loan to Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) to
support expanded geothermal electricity generation in two locations in Patuha, West Java, and
Dieng in Central Java. The project will result in an additional generating capacity of 55 MW at the
existing Patuha geothermal plant in West Java and another 55 MW at the existing Dieng
geothermal plant in Central Java. The outcome of the project is increased adequacy and
sustainability of energy systems, while the project impacts are increased contribution to
geothermal energy in Indonesian power supply and renewable energy in electricity sector. The
project includes: (i) workover of existing wells and drilling of new wells; (ii) construction of fluid
collection and injection systems, 55/55 MW power plants, transmission interconnection systems;
(iii) enhanced corporate capacity, and (iv) enhanced livelihood of neighboring communities.
2. The project is categorized B both for environmental safeguard13 and resettlement

safeguard14 and category C (no impacts) for the Indigenous people or customary communities
following the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS). With the nature of project component and
activities, the project is classified some gender element. Due diligence on safeguards and gender
needs to be carried out and planning documents (Resettlement Plan and Social Audit,
Environment Impact Assessment) need to be prepared, in addition to Summary Poverty
Reduction and Social Strategy (SPRSS) and gender action plan (GAP).
3. The mission purposes is to conduct initial consultations with communities around the
projects areas, potential affected persons, and stakeholders on environmental and social
safeguards and gender for the two sub-projects (Patuha 2 and Dieng 2) under the proposed
PGSP. The combined consultations conducted in partnership with GDE will be part of the due
diligence and preparation of safeguards planning and gender action plan.
13
A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are
irreversible, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to
physical works. An environmental impact assessment is required.
14 The project is considered category A for involuntary resettlement if the activities would severely affect 200 or more
persons defined as (I) being physically displaced, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive assets
B. DISCUSSION AND MISSION FINDINGS
4. The second stakeholder consultation were conducted in 6 villages from 11– 13 September
2019 for Dieng and in 3 villages in Patuha, from 16–17 September 2019.
5. The structure of both public consultations divided into three sessions: 1) opening sessions;
2) presentations of key findings and responses; 3) question and answers. Discussion was focus
on progress has been made after 1st public consultation conducted in March 2019, and share the
social safeguard finding (environment, social and gender) to the participant to gain their input.
6. Participants in Dieng included affected community members, representatives of village

government, community-based organizations (including PKK, Farmer Group, Karang Taruna,
Bumdes, elderly groups), camat (hear of sub-district government), districts agencies (ATR/BPN,
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup), GDE headquarters and regional units, the TA consultants, and ADB.
Discussion conducted with key stakeholders, that include land renters/users, village head, camat
and communities’ members. Especially for Desa Karang Tengah the issue more focus on
resettlement, that involve local government and village government to participate. The meeting
lead by GDE Unit Project Manager with mixing presentation by GDE and ADB consultant team.
Table 1: Number of Participants in Dieng (11-13 September 2019)

FEMALE MALE TOTAL
VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME
 %  % 
Kepakisan Wednesday, 11 September 2019 – morning 3 14% 19 86% 22

Sikunang Wednesday, 11 September 2019 – afternoon 10 38% 16 62% 26
Bakal Thursday, 12 September 2019 – morning 4 14% 24 86% 28
Dieng Kulon Thursday, 12 September 2019 – afternoon 4 16% 21 84% 25
Karang Tengah Friday, 13 September 2019 – morning 23 39% 36 61% 59
Pranten Friday, 13 September 2019 – afternoon 8 44% 10 56% 18
Total 52 29% 126 71% 178
7. Participants in Patuha included affected community members, representatives of village

government, community-based organizations (including PKK, Farmer Group, Karang Taruna,
Bumdes, elderly groups), camat (hear of sub-district government), districts agencies (Dinas
Lingkungan Hidup, and BKSDA), GDE headquarters and regional units, the TA consultants, and
ADB. Discussion conducted with key stakeholders, that include land renters/users, village head,
camat and communities members.
Table 2: Number of Participants in Patuha (16-17 September 2019)

FEMALE MALE TOTAL
VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME
 %  % 
Sugihmukti Monday, 16 September 2019 – morning 20 22% 69 78% 89
Alam Endah Monday, 16 September 2019 – afternoon 33 52% 30 48% 63
Panundaan Tuesday, 17 September 2019 – morning 29 43% 39 57% 68
Total 82 37% 138 63% 220
8. The discussion went well, interactive and in-depth dialogue to make them understand ADB
consultant finding, being discus and seeking their input to understand their concern. Several
common issues raised and identified, that classified into following table.
9. Overall, the consultations went well. Participants see positive aspects of the consultations.
Communities have received direct benefit through GDE’s community development program. Most
concerns responded to in safeguards assessments; some still require GDE’s attention.
Common issues raised: Dieng

 Most critical: power plant location (Karang Tengah)
 Social: Opportunities of jobs at GDE, community development programs to the communities.
 Environment: Noise, community risks, water pollution/abstraction, impact during
construction.
 Gender: GDE’s support to women.
 Communication: Project Information, scope and benefit in written
Common issues raised: Patuha

 Opportunity to job and business opportunities at GDE, including for women.
 GDE to provide more sustainable and strategic community development program.
 Transparancy of the program to communities.
 Dust and noise impacts during construction
 Project Information, scope and benefit in written
C. Social Safeguards: Dieng
12. The expansion of the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant will require a total of 316,810 m 2
(31.8 ha). Of this, 313,800 m2 (99 %) is already owned by Geo Dipa, while 3,010m 2 is privately
owned land. This will be acquired for a new pipeline and road access along 400 m connecting
well pad 9 to the Dieng-2 power plant site. Transmission line would be laid underground, along
new and existing pipeline and inspection road ROWs all to way to the existing sub-station
(approximately 6 km) which has less social and environmental impact.
13. According to Inventory of Losses (IOL) census carried out in August 2019, documented
approximately 4.02 ha of land in the Ex PLN’s land earmarked for construction of the Dieng-2
power plant that has been leased to a farmer group (comprising 23 members and 4 coordinators).
Most of the other Geo Dipa owned land identified for construction of sub-project components are
unencumbered except for 1 small plot of land (471 m2) in the pipeline ROW between well pad 7
to well pad 10 which occupied by one farmer. Land acquisition and cessation of activities on land
currently owned by GDE identified for Dieng-2 development will affect 107 persons (33
households). All AHs reside in the village of Karang Tengah, (Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten
Banjarnegara).
Key concerns:
14. Participants see positive aspects of the consultations and expect on-going consultation
throughout the project cycle. Written information also requested rather than verbal information.
One community leader from Pranten said so far communication between GDEs and community
is formal, and they has been less involved in the village or community events (weddings, religious
ceremony etc). Communication was done formally. Further he hope more informally approach
from GDEs which make local community feel equal and prioritized.
15. Social issues raised by participants partly the same as March consultation 2019, but the
submission of objection was softer. Some of those concerns/issues have been addressed during
the consultations and in safeguards plans, but some need to be considered for improvement of
mitigation measures and require GDEs attention.
16. All participants in six villages expressed their expectation to involve in the projects as a
construction labor. They asked GDE prioritize local people/neighboring communities for work at
GDE and information preference through village offices, not “paguyuban” and various medias.
This concerns have been included in the RP by providing opportunities to project related jobs not
only for vulnerable and severely AHs, but will expanded to community in all six villages. GDE’s
ensure to include provision priority of local people for project related jobs in the EPC’s contract
and GDE’s recruitment requirements for Geo Dipa’s jobs and business opportunities.
17. Training and mentoring on mechanic and welding for youth has been design by GDE’s to
give more skill which will enable and empower youth to work in non-farming sector, including
opportunity to work in GDE Dieng unit as skill worker.
18. Participants in general affirmed that they have received some direct benefits in the form
of GDE’s on-going CSR, but they expected GDE to continue providing community development
program: support to education, youth program, waste management and sustainable environment
development, SMEs training and inputs. One of woman participant from Pranten village said
SMEs training for improving women skills is better (more sustainable) rather than ‘micro credit”
program which applied by Dieng 1. This concern has been included in the RP. GDEs need to
design of sustainable and strategic community development program with gender perspective as
part of GDE’s PKBL/CSR and disclose it on communities Patuha.
19. Decreasing of drinking water quality (potential contamination) and reduce of water supply
during dry season was articulated at least by participants from Kepakisan, Sikunang, Dieng Kulon
and Pranten. They requested GDE to provide water supply program to mitigate this issue.
Participant from Bakal Village worried their water resource (spring) which located surrounding
propose new well in ex PLNs land will be contaminated. They asked further assessment on this
issue to anticipate their worried.
20. All participants worried about damages during project construction, learning from the case
of Dieng 1 which not repaired properly15. Written agreement on compensation for damaged or lost
assets/public facilities during project construction asked by Bakal and Karang Tengah community.
Entitlements for impacts during project construction have been included in the RP GDEs need to
emphasized this obligation in the project contractor’s contract.
21. A coordinator of renter (Ex PLN’s land) expressed negative perceptions about the project
and assume the project will make residents suffer. Increasing of noise will disturb people because
their settlement is located very close to propose power plant. Further He asked proper
compensation for tenant farmer and coordinator. The village head stated that he personally did
not approve the location of the power plant in Karang Tengah.
15
Among others e.g. concrete village road used for access road which repaired below specification; water pipeline was
broken but not repair until now; Dieng Kulon village road use for heavy equipment access excavated by GDE for
temporary drainage was not repaired up to now.
22. Compensation and assistance for sharecroppers have been presented in the
consultations and included in the RP. Further consultations with APs on land acquisition
procedure, entitlements including for coordinator of renters and village head.
D. Social Safeguards: Patuha
23. The majority of land required for the Patuha 2 subproject is owned by GDE; additional
26,000 m2 (or 2.6 ha) land required for Wellpad 9 (Loc BB), and right-of-way (ROW) for new
pipeline and inspection road between Well pad 9 (Loc BB) to Well pad 4 (Loc G). Those additional
land is located in forest area and tea plantation with no occupation or use by people. An principle
permit for forest land and extension of tea plantation land leasing need to be secured prior to
commencement of construction activities.
Key concerns:
24. All participants supported the project. Issues raised by local communities from the three
villages affected by project are similar which was related to opportunity to work in the project,
continue of community development program and concerns on the impact during construction.
25. GDE is requested to prioritize neighboring communities, especially youth group for
working at GDE both during construction and operation as well. There are many local youth
communities have skill because they have technical vocational high school background. Head of
Sugihmukti Village expected information regarding job opportunity preference through village
offices or “RW”.
26. Response to this request, GDE said that the expectation is in line with the GDE Unit
Patuha management policy, and have been applied for Patuha 1. Many local communities works
in Patuha 1 as a skill worker. Communities recognized GDE’s support to the community
development and expected GDE to continue providing community development program. The
program be provided to village office or Bumdes. CDP include economic empowerment, local art
empowerment, opportunities for communities as sub-contractor for GDE, support village
infrastructure program. Response to this request, GDEs commit to continue implementing
community development program that will pay attention to communities need, but in another hand
GDE’s program is limited and will support the program based on priority.
27. Heavy equipment access will use the existing road along the three villages. Learnt from
the case of Patuha I, all participants expressed their worries on increasing noise and dust during
construction. Some participants asked the GDE to mitigate by avoiding mobilization during night
time, but many of them also asked compensation due to noise disturbance. They asked
compensation not only given to community along the access road (as what ever done in Patuha
1) but to all villagers proportionally.
E. Gender: Dieng
28. The second Public consultations in Dieng were conducted in 6 villages (Kepakisan,
Sikunang, Bakal, Dieng Kulon, Karang Tengah, and Pranten) from 11-13 September 2019. These
public consultations were carried out in three sessions, namely: 1) opening sessions; 2)
presentations of key findings and responses from first consultation; 3) question and answers.
29. As shown in the Table 3, a total of 178 people, comprising of 52 women (29%) and 126
men (71%) who were representatives of village officials, community leaders, CBO (PKK,
Posyandu, Bumdes) participated in the second public consultation.
Table 3: Number of Participants in the Dieng Second Public Consultation
VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME FEMALE MALE TOTAL

 %  % 
Kepakisan Wednesday, 11 3 14% 19 86% 22

September 2019 –
morning
Sikunang Wednesday, 11 10 38% 16 62% 26
September 2019 –
afternoon
Bakal Thursday, 12 September 4 14% 24 86% 28
2019 – morning
Dieng Kulon Thursday, 12 September 4 16% 21 84% 25
2019 – afternoon
Karang Tengah Friday, 13 September 23 39% 36 61% 59
2019 – morning
Pranten Friday, 13 September 8 44% 10 56% 18
2019 – afternoon
Total 52 29% 126 71% 178
30. Compared to the first public consultations (see Table 4), there were more women
participating in the second public consultations. From both the first and second public
consultations (see Table 3), out of 361 participants, there was a total of 96 women (27%).
Table 4: Number of Participants in 1st public consultation (Dieng, March)

 %  % 
Pranten Thursday, 21 March – 6 21% 22 79% 28

morning
Kepakisan Thursday, 21 March – 10 50% 10 50% 20
afternoon
Karang Tengah Friday, 22 March 10 26% 28 74% 38
2019 – morning
Dieng Kulon Friday, 22 March 9 26% 25 74% 34
2019 – afternoon
Bakal Saturday, 23 Sep 3 7% 38 93% 41
2019 – morning
Sikunang Saturday, 23 Sep 6 27% 16 73% 22
2019 – afternoon
Total 52 29% 126 71% 183
Table 5: Number of Participants in: 1st and 2nd public consultation (Dieng)
VILLAGE 1st PUBLIC CONSULTATION 2nd PUBLIC CONSULTATION 1st & 2nd PUBLIC CONSULTATION
FEMALE MALE TOTA FEMALE MALE TOTA FEMALE MALE TOTA
L L L
 %
 %
  %
 %
  %
 %

Pranten 6 21% 22 79% 28 8 44% 10 56% 18 14 30% 32 70% 46
Kepakisan 10 50% 10 50% 20 3 14% 19 86% 22 13 31% 29 69% 42
Karang 10 26% 28 74% 38 23 39% 36 61% 59 33 34% 64 66% 97
Tengah
Dieng Kulon 9 26% 25 74% 34 4 16% 21 84% 25 13 22% 46 78% 59
Bakal 3 7% 38 93% 41 4 14% 24 86% 28 7 10% 62 90% 69
Sikunang 6 27% 16 73% 22 10 38% 16 62% 26 16 33% 32 67% 48
Total 44 24% 139 76% 183 52 29% 126 71% 178 96 27% 265 73% 361
31. Consistent to the first public consultations held in March 2019, the second public
consultation had high numbers of women participants when meetings were conducted in the
afternoon and on Friday as it is a holiday in Dieng.
32. It is noted that in the second public consultation, there was high participation in Karang
Tengah Village which has been identified as the most affected village. Out of 59 participants, 23
(39%) were women. Despite there were high number of women participants, not one woman
spoke during the meeting. The meeting in Karang Tengah was held on Friday morning and started
late due to some miscommunication regarding the invitation. The meeting was dominated by male
villagers addressing objection and negative impacts regarding Geo Dipa project.
Key Concerns
33. Access to information on Job and Business Opportunity. Both men and women in all
the 6 villages are keen to obtain information about skilled and unskilled job opportunities as well
as business opportunities from Geo Dipa Unit 2 project. Women participants said that currently
there is lack of information about job and business opportunities.
34. A woman in Bakal Village suggested that information on job and business opportunities
should be disseminated using various media such as flyer, banner, and WhatsApp application. A
man in Bakal Village added that information disseminated through flyer, banner and WhatsApp
should also use simple language. These concerns have been incorporated in the Gender Action
Plan (GAP), namely: in 1.1.1. contract documents for contractors include requirements/provisions
for employing at least XX% women; 1.1.3. at least XX% of local people hired, including local
women; 3.1.1. stakeholder communication strategy includes (1) participation of at least 30%
women in community consultation meetings; (2) separate meetings for women; (3) gender
sensitive principles for printed, audio and visual materials; (4) Use of different media (e.g. flyer,
banner, WhatsApp) in order for information to reach women.
35. Community Development Programs. Various suggestions related to Geo Dipa

Community Development Programs were addressed, namely: 1) livelihood programs in the form
of trainings for small-medium enterprises and provision of equipment particularly for potato drying,
processing and packaging (addressed by women from Sikunang, Bakal and Pranten Village). A
woman in Pranten village stressed that training programs are more sustainable than micro credit
programs. She also said that local people may not be able to repay loans. A woman in Sikunang
Village requested that existing youth training provided by Geo Dipa to include women youths in
order to provide equal opporunity; 2) Focus on sustainable environment programs in particular
waste management, and renewable energy training programs. In addition to that, community
development programs should include monitoring activities, including monitoring of previous tree-
planting activities which are now left abandoned (addressed by woman from Dieng Kulon); 3)
provision of early education/preschool (addressed by woman from Kepakisan Village); 4)
improvement of roads and bridges (addressed by woman from Bakal Village). These concerns
have been addressed in Gender Action Plan (GAP) 3.3.1. at least 30% women participate in the
planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of community development program, and
3.3.2. separate meetings for women are conducted to identify women’s priorities and needs. With
this GAP action and target, the expected result would be that local women and men jointly with
Geo Dipa identify focus, priorities and strategic activities for the community development
programs, including targets to be monitored and evaluated.
36. Health and Safety Issues. A woman in Sikunang Village expressed concerns about
truck/heavy vehicles passing through narrow village roads with water pipes crossing over these
roads, meanwhile children play on these roads. She requested that Geo Dipa should arrange
trucks/heavy vehicles to pass the village roads in the evenings for the safety of children, and to
reduce noise. In addition to that, if truck drivers caused damage to the water pipes, then they/Geo
Dipa should provide compensation to the owners/villagers. Quality of village roads was also
addressed, particularly to request funding from district government to improve the condition of
roads owned and managed by the district government. This issue has been addressed in
safeguards through the establishment of Grievance Mechanism, including Grievance Committee.
In addition to that under Gender Action Plan (GAP) 1.3.1. at least XX% members in GRC are
women, in order to create women friendly grievance channels.
F. Gender: Patuha
37. Table 4 below show a total of 220 people, comprising of 82 women (37%) and 138 men
(63%) who were representatives of village officials, community leaders, CBO (PKK, Posyandu,
Bumdes) participated in the second public consultation.
Table 6: Number of participants in the 2nd public consultation (Patuha)

 %  % 
Sugihmukti Monday, 16 September 2019 – morning 20 22% 69 78% 89

Alam Endah Monday, 16 September 2019 – 33 52% 30 48% 63
afternoon
Panundaan Tuesday, 17 September 2019 – 29 43% 39 57% 68
morning
Total 82 37% 138 63% 220
38. Compared to the first public consultations (see Table x), there were more women
participating in the second public consultations. From both the first and second public
consultations (see Table 6), out of 391 participants, there was a total of 121 women (31%).
Table 7: Number of participants in the 1st public consultation (Patuha, March)

 %  % 
Sugihmukti Monday, 18 March 2019 – afternoon 12 20% 49 80% 61

Alam Endah Tuesday, 19 March 2019 – morning 9 18% 42 82% 51
Panundaan Tuesday, 19 March 2019 – morning 18 31% 41 69% 59
Total 39 23% 132 77% 171
Table 8: Number of participants in the 1st public consultation (March 2019)

and 2nd public consultation (September 2019) in Patuha
VILLAGE 1st PUBLIC CONSULTATION 2nd PUBLIC CONSULTATION 1st & 2nd PUBLIC CONSULTATION
FEMALE MALE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL
 %  %   %  %   %  % 
Sugihmukti 12 20% 49 80% 61 20 22% 69 78% 89 32 21% 118 79% 150
Alam Endah 9 18% 42 82% 51 33 52% 30 48% 63 42 37% 72 63% 114
Panundaan 18 31% 41 69% 59 29 43% 39 57% 68 47 37% 80 63% 127
Total 39 23% 132 77% 171 82 37% 138 63% 220 121 31% 270 69% 391
39. It is noted that in the second public consultation, there was high participation in Sugih
Mukti Village. Out of 89 participants, 20 (22%) were women. Despite there were high number of
women participants, not one woman spoke during the meeting.
Key Concerns
40. In general key concerns addressed during the second public consultations in Patuha were
similar to the ones in Dieng namely: 1) job and business opportunities; 2) requests/ suggestions
for Geo Dipa’s community development programs, particularly livelihood programs in the form of
trainings and provisions of equipment; 3) concerns over heavy vehicles passing by the village
roads. In addition to these, women and men in Panundaan Village suggested that Geo Dipa’s
community development programs to not focus on community empowerment (i.e. capacity
building) but to also include infrastructure development and provision of food and nutrition for
children.
G. ENVIRONMENT
DIENG – Key environmental issues and concerns raised

41. Key environmental issues and concerns raised by the participants at the Public
Consultation of Dieng Unit 2 development are noted below. The participants of Bakal and Karang
Tengah are generally more curious and indicated higher level of concerns due to the future
development of Dieng Unit 2 in Karang Tengah compared to those of Dieng Kulon, Pranten,
Sikunang, and Kepakisan who are gradually accustomed to the existing operation of Dieng Unit
1.
42. The environmental issues and concerns shared among these villages are as follows:
 Inconsistent delivery of project information related to Dieng Unit 2.
 They expected an MOU between GDE and the village government as a form of
commitment that would uphold the community’s rights to seek compensation if the project
causes environmental deterioration and disturbance to the community such as elevated
noise level, frequent H2S smell and exposure from the gas emitted from the rock muffler,
and saline water in the community’s wells.
 The community representatives are still curious whether the operation of Dieng Unit 1 has
caused accelerated corrosion of the galvanized zinc roof used by many houses in the
area. Further, the wonder if Dieng Unit 2 may also cause this problem.
 Request for trash bins for the houses and supports for training and equipment for solid
waste composting in the light of district government service on solid waste management.
 Overflow from brine water ponds that could result in soil erosion and uncontrolled drainage
to crop farming areas in the proximity.
 GDE and/or its contractors to be mindful about muddy and dusty road caused by the
vehicles entering and exiting the well pads and community safety within the proximity of
school and market to avoid collision between vehicles and people.
 The participants wonder if exposure to H2S gas and emission from the rock muffler may
cause health effects
 Perceived risks that GDE operation has resulted in reduced water flow of the river and
community’s wells particularly during the dry season.
 Reparation or replacement of public facilities such as road and properties such as clean
water pipeline damaged by the project.
43. The environmental issues and concerns specific to future Dieng Unit 2 projects and raised
by the public consultation participants from Karang Tengah and Bakal villages, are as follows:
 Setulu, Sedendam, and Siranti springs are reported by the community representatives as
the main clean water sources for the household and farming activities. There is a
perceived risk that the construction and operation of Dieng Unit 2 at Karang Tengah village
would impact availability and quality of these springs as it is in their perception these water
sources flow underneath the Karang Tengah village.
 One of the land renter coordinator (Mr Nasrullah) at the GDE’s owned land (ex-mess PLN)
indicated his objections that the Dieng Unit 2 will be constructed at this particular site.
Concerns over what the safe distance (buffer zone) between the future Dieng Unit 2 and
the nearest residential areas at Karang Tengah should be.
PATUHA - Key environmental issues and concerns raised

44. Key environmental issues and concerns raised by the participants at the Public
Consultation of Patuha Unit 2 development are noted below. The participants of all three villages,
i.e., Sugih Mukti, Panundaan, and Alam Endah shared similar environmental issues and concerns
as follows:
 Patuha Unit 2 activities should be aligned with the requirements of the approved ANDAL
and RKL-RPL (2010).
 Community’s unawareness of the Company’s emergency response, handling and
communication system in the event of toxic gas/H2S release and other emergency
situations.
 Mobilization/demobilization of heavy vehicles and equipment at night time is avoided as
not to cause disturbance to the residents living in the proximity of the access road from/to
the main Ciwidey road to GDE’s project sites; and if this activity must be conducted at
night time, the community expects a fair compensation.
 All sections of the access road to GDE’s project site to reduce airborne dust.
 Water spraying should be conducted during dry season to reduce airborne dust.
 Community safety on the road should be prioritized by providing “zebra cross’ and signage
near the school and mitigation to avoid collision between vehicles and heavy equipment
with the community and minimizing public and private property damages.
 Reparation or replacement of public facilities such as road and properties such as clean
water pipeline damaged by the project.
45. No environmental issues were noted as specific to individual villages.
H. Communication and Information Sharing
46. Overall the FFM and consultation was success. For communication and sharing
information, the issue divided into 2 sections, which are: external and internal communication.
Issue related to external communication mainly raised related information availability by the
project, especially written information. Internal communication more to SOP and coordination
between GDE HQ and Units.
47. Dieng
Below is common issues raised related to communication and information:
 Critical issue is information about power plant: location, what will happen in Karang Tengah,
Dieng.
 Corporate issue: what is GDE? Project perception need to be built to increase understanding
about project
 Understanding substance of geothermal and how it operates: technology wise, social and
environmental impact.
 Project’s scope, benefits and impacts, and how to mitigate. Project timeline
 Complaints mechanism. Recruitment & Work opportunities. Production bonus
 Community Development, Livelihood restoration, Capacity Building, Environment and
Biodiversity.
48. Patuha
Below is common issues raised related to communication and information:
 Spesific issue related to the project are wild hunter, biodiversity and conservation area. Need
better engagement with BKSDA Patuha, Aspinal foundation, as strategic partner to make a
way for GDE to achieve green PROPER (government highest recognition for BUMN that able
to manage environmental issue wisely).
 Corporate issue: what is GDE? Project perception need to be built to increase understanding
about project
 Understanding substance of geothermal and how it operates: technology wise, social and
environmental impact.
 Project’s scope, benefits and impacts, and how to mitigate. Project timeline
 Complaints mechanism. Recruitment & Work opportunities. Production bonus
 Community Development, Livelihood restoration, Capacity Building, Environment and
Biodiversity.
49. Internal communication: GDE staff have to increase project understanding between
project team members (HQ and units), to have the same level of understanding on the project
and management issues, emerging trends and threats, coordination, and project planning for
efficient functioning of project implementation. Including to develop internal rule: protocol
communication, SOP for stakeholder engagement, GRM, emergency situation and recruitment.
This also including capacity building for GDE on how to communicate and engage the community,
and develop communication tools (project Information, timeline, scope, benefits, impacts and how
to mitigate).
Attachments:
Appendix 1: Detailed consultation records
Appendix 2 : List of participants
Abridged translation of Consultations with Local NGOs and
Individual Development Practitioners involved in Dieng
Two consultation meetings were conducted with local NGOs on 30 August and 1 October
2019.1 Although five NGOs were invited, only one (ISDI) was able to attend the meeting on
30 August. Of eight local NGOs invited to attend the second meeting, six attended. Table 1
provides the list of local NGOs who participated in consultations regarding the Dieng-2
Geothermal Expansion sub-project (Dieng-2).
Table 1: List of Local NGOs consulted concerning the Dieng-2 Sub-project
Date Name of Local NGOs and Individuals Reprented by

involved in Dieng
30 August 1) Inclusive Social Development Initiative Dr. Ahmad
2019 (ISDI). Universiti Islam Negeri Sunan Salehuddin
Kalijaga, Yogyakarta.
1 October 2) Komunitas Pencinta Lingkungan Lembah
2019 Seroja and Faciltator for Watu Wulung
Village
3) WALHI, Jawa Tengah – represented by Tommy
one of its members NGOs (Jaringan Kerja
Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Wonosobo)
4) Facilitator for BPDAS2 Seraya Opak Sekti
Progo
5) PUNCEN, Yogyakarta Yudho Indardjo
6) Pegiat Lingkungan Wonosobo Fahruddin
7) Former Director of WALHI Yogyakarta Suparlan
1 The consultations were mediated by Dr. R. Y. Zakaria (SES Consultant) as part of the SES contract.
2 BPDAS – Badan Pengelola Daerah Aliran Sungai (River Basin Management Authority)
1
Title : Social and Environmental Dynamics in the Dieng area (Q & A format)
Time and Place: 9 – 11 am, 30 August 2019, KARSA Meeting Space, Jambon,
Yogyakarta
Participants: R.Y. Zakaria, Dr. Ahmad Salehuddin, ISDI, and Arum Widayatsih3
Date: 30 August 2019
Summary of Discussion
1. Religiosity is very high in the Dieng area, but in their interaction with nature, they exploit
land without allowing for a fallow period. There is a very strong link between religion and
agriculture in Dieng (theologisation of agriculture). Agriculture is a form of worship. All
forms of activities in Dieng have a religious justification – the Hajj pilgrimage,
construction of mosques and musholla, various religious rituals. There are a number of
Quran reciting groups and religious organizations in Dieng4. The process of religious
intensification started in Kejajar and moved gradually up to Dieng. “Dieng” means “Holy
(di) Land (Eng)”. Part of the reason local people migrated to and are willing to cope with
the cold climate of Dieng is because they feel they are closer to God.
2. How do local people reconcile the contradiction between religious values and
exploitation of nature ? The local communities practice many religious rituals – mainly in
the form of prayers for well-being / safety (keselamatan). Local communities spend up to
Rp. 750 million on an annual event called TPQ, and up to Rp. 150 million every 70 days
on a ritual called neton Sabtu Wage which is hosted on a revolving basis among village
hamlets (Dusun).
3. Do local people have any complaints or reservations about this ? It is clear to outsiders
that potato farming has caused a big problem in Dieng. But local communities do not
realise these effects. Among other things, there is a stunting of children in the sense that
the religious education that children are obliged to obtain from local pondok do not
adequately equip them with necessary knowledge and education.
Now that potato farming is experiencing a crisis, the economic problem will be inherited
by the new (millennial) generation. Any development interventions need to target this
generation (with its own educational shortcomings). Dieng has been the object of
different forms of tourism from past times. This is a viable sector to develop.
4. Does tourism cause tension within the local Dieng community ? The millennial
generation tends to choose tourism as preferred economic activity. However, there was
a case where tourism was rejected by Sembungan Village residents as being in conflict
with local sensitivities. Over the course of time, the concept of syariah tourism and
3 Venue Host (KARSA)

4 IPNU, IPPNU, GP Anshor, and Muslimat NU.
2
homestays has developed – where unmarried men and women are not allowed to share
the same tent or room.
Under one of its KKN5 support programs, ISDI volunteers supported the preparation of a
“Roadmap to Tourism” which was presented to the Head of Sikunang Village. The older
generation is not so favourably disposed towards the prospects of tourism development.
Initiatives need to target the younger generation.
Title : Social and Environmental Dynamics in the Dieng area

Time and Place: 9 – 11 am, 1 October 2019, KARSA Meeting Space, Jambon,
Yogyakarta
Participants: R.Y. Zakaria, Yudho, Sekti, Parlan, Tommy, Aris, Tyas and Arum
Widayatsih
Date: 1 October 2019
Summary of Discussion
1. Involvement in the Dieng area

 Yudho Indardjo (PUNCEN) – was involved for 2 months over 2013/2014 in
providing assistance to create spatial data for the Tulis River Basin (DAS) area
(including Karang Tengah Village area).
 Sekti (BPDAS facilitator) – Involved intermittently between 2009 – 2014 in collecting
data to establish database re: watershed and environmental conditions, and
consulted worked with local communities toward supporting Kabupaten, Provincial
and National Government objectives for developing tourism in the Dieng Plateau. .
2. Issues concerning the environment and agriculture.

 The Tulis watershed (DAS Tulis) is divided into three sections. The upper
watershed area is characterized by high intensity of land slides, extensive and
intensive potato farming. In the middle watershed area, there are more tree crops
and other food crops (eg. maize). There is a lot of salak cultivation in the lower
watershed area.
 Efforts to improve livelihoods in the upper watershed area (eg. coffee development,
distribution of goats, and honey production, introduction of eucalyptus and
mountain pine trees) have not been successful.
 When the Dieng geothermal plant was under Indonesia Power, soil erosion and
landslides due to potato farming threatened power plant facilities. This was
mitigated by the planting of trees.
 Local people are not happy that they have to pay full price for electricity when
electrical power is being generated in their own backyard. The idea of local
communities being shareholders in geothermal power generation was raised.
5 Kuliah Kerja Nyata (community development facilitation activities by undergraduate)
3
3. JKPM (Jaringan Kerja Pemberdayaan Masyarakat)’s Perspective
 The Dieng environment has become degraded because of potato farming. Soil is
no longer fertile.However, JKPM has not encountered this issue as a source of
conflict between local communities and Geodipa.
 The issues raised concerning Geodipa were insufficient labour absorption from
among local communities into Geodipa operations.
 The fast pace of tourism development in the Dieng area has created a garbage
problem which has not been adequately addressed to date.
4. JKPM – “Dieng is dying”.

 Dieng is declining not only from the environmental problems but also from socio-
economic problems. What seems to be boom times attributed to high value crops
does not benefit everyone, only a few. Many people are working just to cope with
debt.
 Tourism (albeit with its garbage problem) provides a promising solution.
 Local farmers are not free. The situation is complex.
 What can Government and other organisations do to improve the situation in Dieng
?
 There is a fear that Geothermal energy exploitation will progress, but conditions of
local people worsen.
5. JKPM - Improvement of Alternative Economic Options

JKPM is supporting local people to cultivate Batavica eggplant (terung belanda) and
carica as alternative economic crops because they are low cost crops. These crops may
be sold as is or further processed. Local people must see the results before they adopt
new things.
6. JKPM - Changing the mindset of Dieng Society

 While this is difficult, it is also very important to do so. Local people do not know
how to manage money (big profits).
 We have worked with local communities to recycle garbage.
 Village Government capacity is weak and needs to be strengthened to better bring
about development. This is very important because local communities respect local
Government leaders.
7. Waste management.
 Awareness building (socialization) in stages.
 Children-oriented strategy (over the last 3 months) – pay for school books by
collecting garbage. Parents also get involved.
4
8. Activities in the Seroja Valley.
 Coffee planning in Sembungan Village.
 The CSR program of Band Indonesia constructed a waste recycling facility in
Sembungan as well as Sikunang Villages.
 Not yet successful because no buyers for recycled products.
 Introduction of an on-line application (RAPEL) which buys alumiminum coated
plastic waste for recycling.
 Currently, there are 14 villages with garbage banks.
9. Religious entry point for interventions

 Local people are very religious from the perspective of intensity of rituals, religious
activities, number and grand places of worship. Local people a disposed to
spending money for religious purposes. This disposition is relevant for intervention
strategies in Dieng.
 For example, one intervention tried to prepare a Book of Sermons concerning
agriculture. This approach is important, because religious leaders are respected in
Dieng and have influence on people’s behavior.
10. Summary of Main Issues in Dieng

 Garbage
 Water supply (conservation)
 Educational stunting. Per 2018, a number of villages6 in Kecamatan Kejajar have
been classified as Red Zone and require appropriate Government attention.
6 Campursari, Sikunang, Sureng and Tieng,
5
Attachments
Attendance Sheet
Photos of NGO Consultation Sessions (KARSA Meeting Space, 1 Oct.19)
6
Social Safeguards content for PROJECT INFORMATION BOOKLET
Dieng-2 Geothermal Expansion Sub-project
What is the Dieng-2 Sub-project?
The proposed Geothermal Power Generation Project will support expansion of Indonesia’s geothermal
generating capacity to contribute to the sustainability and sufficiency of the electricity system, aligned with
Sustainable Development Goal 7: access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. The
Dieng Geothermal Expansion sub-project (Dieng-2) will include (a) drilling of new wells for geothermal fluid
production and re-injection, (b) construction of fluid collection and re-injection systems, (c) power plant, and
(d) transmission inter-connection systems. The project will strengthen GDE’s capacity to plan for, develop,
and operate geothermal power plants, including management of complex technical conditions, multiple
coordinated contracts, and environmental risks. The project will support enhancement of GDE’s Community
Development Program through more strategic engagement with the communities and evaluation of
programs that can most meaningfully contribute to improved well-being.
Dieng 2 project is located in Wonosobo and Banjarnegara District, Central Java Province
Figure 1: Proposed Power Plant, Wells and SAGS for Dieng-2 Geothermal Expansion sub-project
1
Figure 2: Proposed Underground Transmission Line route for Dieng-2 Geothermal Expansion sub-project
What is benefit of project to the community

General (benefits to others)
 Electrical power generation (other consumers).

 Clean energy source (Indonesia and the world).
Benefits for Local Communities
 Improved communications, and awareness building.

 Improved complaints handling (GRM).
 Modified HR approach (more employment for local people, transparent recruitment, identify
future needs, prepare potential local youth for positions) - TBC
 More strategic CSR / ComDev strategy and program (responsive to livelihood security
challenges).
1. Environmental safeguards contents (provided by ENV team – to be inserted)
2
Social Safeguards:
What are the impacts of the Dieng 2 project to the community surrounding?
The expansion of the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant will require a total of 30.83 ha. Of this, 30.53 ha (99)
of land is already owned by PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) Land acquisition and clearing will only be required
for two sub-project components :
i) Acquisition of 3,010 m2 of privately owned land for a new pipeline and access road from Wellpad
9 to Geodipa-owned proposed site for Dieng-2 power plant. According to IOL carried out in August
2019, the land belong to 6 AHs
ii) Land clearing of a 5.7 ha Geodipa-owned site (ex Mess PLN) which has been leased to a farmers
groups (23 persons) for vegetable cultivation.
Number of APs and losses may change following detailed engineering design during implementation stage
What is a Resettlement Plan ?

The Resettlement Plan (RP) is a planning document that describes impacts of land acquisition activities on
local peoples’ assets and livelihoods. It provides for adequate compensation for lost assets, and income
restoration assistance for affected livelihoods. The Resettlement Plan was prepared in consultation with
APs and concerned groups. The RP is meant to ensure that affected people do not become worse off as a
result of the sub-project.
What are the key principles of resettlement under the Dieng 2 Sub Project?
The Dieng 2 project core principles for resettlement are to ensure that APs are not worse off from the project
and to provide an opportunity for the local population to derive benefits from it. The Dieng 2 Project
resettlement is based on the following principle
a. The sub-project will avoid or minimise impacts local people’s assets and livelihoods.
b. Conduct meaningful consultations with APs, stakeholders, concerned NGOs, and community
groups either men or women to solicit their participation in land acquisition and involuntary
resettlement process and monitoring.
c. Inform APs on land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process, their entitlements, and
compensation and assistance options. Pay attention to the needs of vulnerable groups, especially
those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, and those without
legal title to land and ensure their participation in consultations;
d. Improve or at least restore the livelihood of the APs through (a) land-based income and livelihood
program; (b) replacement of assets with equal or higher value; (c) compensation at full
replacement cost for lost assets; and (d) additional assistance through benefit sharing where
possible;
e. Assist and compensate APs without title or any recognizable legal rights to land for non-land assets
at replacement cost.
f. There shall be effective mechanisms for hearing and resolving grievances during implementation
of the resettlement plan.
g. Negotiated land acquisition will follow procedure in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner
principles and be confirmed trough written record and verified by an independent third party;
3
h. The Sub-project will not issue the notice to proceed for any construction works until full payment
has been fully disbursed to all APs and compensated APs have cleared the acquired land and
harvested their crops in a timely manner.
i. Monitor implementation of the resettlement planning and resettlement outcomes and impacts on
the standards of living of APs. Disclose the monitoring reports on the project’s website and make it
available on the project office
Who is responsible for resettlement activities and Project Implementation?

The PT Geo Dipa Board of Directors (BOD) Jakarta will be the executing agency (EA) who has overall
responsibility for coordination, policy directions, and administration of Geothermal Power Generation
Project (GPGP). The PMU has responsibility for day to day management and supervision of the GPGP,
and will be accountable for technical, safeguards, and financial reporting. Dieng Unit will be for the day-to-
day implementation and monitoring of safeguards plans, including implementation of the LRP
What it does mean by cut-off-date and when will be the cut of date ?
The cut-off date is the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area make residents or users
of the same eligible to be categorized as AP / entitled party to receive compensation and other assistances.
The cut-off-date for acquired land will coincide with the Detail Measurement Survey that will be conducted
by GDE Land Acquisition Team . The cut off date for land clearing are set at 31 August 2019
What are the entitlements of APs in Dieng 2 Project
NO. TYPE OF LOSS ENTITILED PARTY / PERSON ENTITLEMENT

1. Loss of land, including Those who have formal legal rights or ▪ Cash compensation at replacement cost
▪ Any taxes and transactional cost borne by the
agricultural and those whose claims over the land is
residential land recognised as a full title, including
people occupying State land in good project..
faith. ▪ Financial assistance for the renewal of the land
ownership documents for the residual area of the
entitled persons' land.
▪ Optional – compensation for residual land if no longer
viable.
2. Loss of crops Owners regardless of land tenure ▪ Annual crops: compensation will be paid based on
status (with certificate of recognizable prevailing market rates.
▪ Perennial crops: compensation at replacement cost
rights, informal dwellers, occupants)
taking into account crops’ productivity and age.
3. Loss of arable land for People who have leased / occupied ▪ Cash compensation for loss of crops income
farming GDE land for farming. equivalent to a minumum of one year of net product
market value
▪ All cultivation activities end of February 2020, after
compensation delivered
▪ APs are allowed to harvest prior to land clearing.
4. Temporary or For those who have formal legal ▪ Lease payments of the affected land by the contractor
permanent impacts due rights or whose claim on land is based on applicable rental fees and agreement with
to construction. recognized as a full right. land owners.
4
NO. TYPE OF LOSS ENTITILED PARTY / PERSON ENTITLEMENT
▪ For productive land, rental fee will not be less than
net income that would have been generated from the
affected productive land.
▪ Compensation for non-land assets acquired (trees,
plants, structures) permanently affected will be
compensated at replacement cost.
▪ Land will be restored to pre-project conditions or
better after construction has been completed.
Those who have no formal legal ▪ Compensation for non-land assets (trees, crops,
rights (certificate) or recognizable title structures) at full replacement cost.
(informal dwellers, croppers)
▪ No rental fee for the period of the impact.
▪ Land will be restored to pre-project conditions or
better after construction has been completed.
Government or State enterprises / ▪ Rebuilding the facility or provide cash compensation
communal property and assets (e.g. based on the agreement with affected party(ies).
schools, mosques, village office
power poles, village road etc.)
5. Loss of resource base  Entitle party considered severely ▪ Given the opportunity to get a job related with the
(high risk of APs, i.e who loses 10% or more of sub-project.
▪ Participation in livelihood restoration program (LRP).
impoverishment) the total assets or earning revenue
sources;
• Entitle party consider vulnarable
groups include 1) HH headed by
woman, elderely or disable; 2) Poor
HH; 3) Landless; 4) Ethnic minority;
• Lease coordinators
6. Unanticipated impacts Those who has lost land and non- ▪ Compensation for any damages to the properties,
or losses land assets regardless formal legal based on prevailing replacement cost.
rights to land
▪ Provisions of mitigating measures shall be mitigated
and documented based on project principles set forth
in this RP
How is the Livelihood Restoration Program in the Sub-project?
Forms of livelihood assistance (to be delivered under ComDev program 2020-2022) are as follows :
a. Employment opportunities on sub-project related activities or Geodipa’s regular operations.
b. Scholarships by considering the needs and the qualifications of the workforce for school going
age children.
c. Access to livelihood restoration activities (including small scale processed carica, keripik kentang
home industry, training on motor mechanics, welding, sewing and craft)
d. Provision of 12 new wells (2 wells per village) as response to potable water supply issues to
address clean water need.
e. Provision of periodic free health screening and follow-up medical services (from 2020 onwards).
f. Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling, training and marketing of products for an existing
group.
LRP will be provided to : (a) Vulnerable and Severely affected households (AHs) ; and (b) Other
vulnerable households and/or persons who suffer construction impacts in 6 villages surrounding
project location (Karang Tengah, Kepakisan, Sikunang, Dieng Kulon, Bakal and Pranten
5
How to monitor the resettlement plan and implementation?
Internal Monitoring
Internal monitoring will be undertaken throughout the land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process.
The scope of monitoring includes: (i) Compensation payments to all APs, (ii) Delivery of livelihood
restoration program and social support, (iii). Public information dissemination and consultations, (iv).
Grievance resolution of outstanding issues requiring management’s attention, (v). The benefit provided
from the project, (vi). Ability of AH’s to re-establish their livelihoods and living standards, (vii) Resettlement
outcomes.
External Monitoring
An independent monitoring agency will be engaged by PMU to carry out land acquisition and resettlement
external monitoring and post- implementation evaluation.
What is the tentative schedule for RP and its implementation?
No. STEPS TIMELINE

A. PLANNING STAGE
1. Social Impact Assessment and Stakeholder Consultation Mar, May, Aug. Sept. 2019
2. ADB Review and Approval of RP Oct. – Nov. 2019
3. Disclosure of RP on ADB website Nov. 2019
B IMPLEMENTATION STAGE
Land Clearing
4. Verification of land users data and negotiation Dec 2019-Jan 2020
5. Compensation payment to affected land users Jan-Feb 2020
6. Affected land users vacate Geodipa-owned land End February 2020
Land Acquisition
7. Further consultation and verification of land ownership March – April 2020
8. Negotiations to get agreement on amount of compensation June 2020
9. Measurement of sub-project boundary by BPN. July – Aug 2020
10. Update RP document and submit to ADB April-June 2020
11. ADB Review and Approval of updated RP July – Aug. 2020
12. Disclosure of updated RP Sept.2020
13. Compensation payment to affected land owners Sept.- October 2020
14. Implementation of Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP) From 2020 onwards in parallel
with construction works.
MONITORING & EVALUATION
15. Internal monitoring periodic
16. External monitoring March 2021 and Sept. 2023
How are the grievances of APs heard and resolved?
6
i) Level 1 – Site Office through the designated contact person (i.e. PR staff). Complaint to be
resolved at the Site Office level (i.e., environment safeguard staff or social safeguard staff , PMC,
Contractor) within five working days and advise the Complainant accordingly.
ii) Level 2 – GRC. When a complaint is not resolved at Level 1, Complainant can submit the complaint
to the GRC. The GRC will convene, review the submission and make a decision within 30 days
from the date of receipt. The Complainant will be informed of the decision in person or by mail. The
Complainant shall be consulted by the GRC when identifying grievance redress options. The GRC
may collaborate with relevant agencies (i.e district land office and TP4P/TP4D for land acquisition
and involuntary resettlement, District agency of environment) to resolve the complaint.
iii) Third level – Appropriate Courts of Law. When the complaint remains unresolved, the
Complainant will be referred by the GRC to the appropriate courts of law.
Who should be contacted for any inquiries about the Project?
PT. Geo Dipa Energi Jakarta :

Aldevco Octagon 2nd Floor
Jl. Warung Jati Barat No. 75
Jakarta Selatan 12740 - Indonesia
T. +62 21 7982925
F. +62 21 7982930
What division??
Dieng Unit
7
LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION ASSESSMENT per 13 October 2019
A. Context, Objective and Methodology
1. Context of the Assessment

This assessment is being done in the context of the proposed Dieng-2 Geothermal Expansion sub-project
(to be financed under an ADB loan). The sub-project is located in the highlands of the Province of Central
Java.
GOI regulations and the ABD SPS 2009 require income restoration to be addressed for people affected by
project activities, in this case land acquisition and project implementation activities.
 GOI provides that affected people receive adequate compensation determined by independent
appraisers.
 ADB SPS further requires affected people should not become worse off, and that severely
affected people and vulnerable people be provided with livelihood restoration and special
assistance.
People who will be affected by land acquisition and land clearing activities for the Dieng-2 Sub-project are
residents of Desa Karang Tengah (village), Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten Banjarnegara in the Province of
Jawa Tengah (Central Java).
Land owners and land users (tenant farmers, cropper) will be entitled to compensation for lost assets
(land, structures, crops) based on replacement costs (appraised by and independent appraiser – KJKK), as
well as income or livelihood restoration assistance for economic losses (due to loss of access to productive
land).
However, it needs to be taken into account that this exercise is being conducted against a backdrop of
very specific socio-economic conditions in the Dieng area. Farmers are exposed to continuous risk of
impoverishment due to the very competitive and speculative nature of their main source of income -
potato farming (which includes high levels of borrowing to cover production costs), diminishing
productivity and profits over the last 20-30 years, increasing reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides
to cope with declining fertility resulting in very pronounced socio-economic dynamics of accumulation
and dispossession as well as soil, ecological, and environmental degradation (including over-extraction of
surface and ground water for farming) . (Source of information - Santoso, H. 2019)
Secondly, there are a number of factors and socio-political issues below the surface contributing to a less
than optimal disposition of local communities towards GDE. (This matter was addressed by the Social
Mapping and Engineering Report, 2018.) Field observations by the SES Consultant, Mr. R.Y. Zakaria
(anthropologist) provides a greater in-depth assessment of local politics in the case of Karang Tengah
1
Village, where nearly all of the households - who will be potentially affected by land acquisition and
clearing - reside. There is competitition among three factions to maximize/extract gains from the presence
of GDE in their midst.
Apart from local resource base and market opportunities, the two above analyses have the most bearing
on livelihood restoration strategy and options.
2. Objective
The purpose of this assessment is to formulate a Livelihood Restoration Assistance package to be

implemented under PT Geodipa’s Community Development (ComDev) program targeted at the following
affected households who will be severely affected by loss of land / loss of access to productive land
(economic loss) :
1. Six land owners who will lose some land to land acquisition for a corridor of land (400 m x 10 m)
connecting Wellpad 9 to the proposed Dieng-2 Power Plant site (locally known as Mess PLN).
2. 23 tenant farmers belonging to the Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani Merdada Sejahtera which is
currently leasing approximately 4 ha of the Mess PLN site for the purpose of potato and vegetable
cultivation.1
3. Approach / Methodology
The methodology applied by this assessment is as follows:
 Literature review (see References section).
 Review :
i) Contextual information about the Dieng area in general, local communities in the Dieng
Geothermal Complex area and local politics in Karang Tengah Village
ii) Taking stock of results of current studies concerning livelihoods and current interventions
in the Dieng area.
iii) Review of what local people say about alternative livelihood opportunities, with focus on
Karang Tengah Village.
 Assessment / identification of short term livelihood restoration interventions which informed
identification or selection of Livelihood Restoration measures for 28 affected households plus
vulnerable households in 6 villages2.
 Assessment / identification of options for longer term interventions (investments) aimed at (i)
eo ie ti g Geodipa’s Pu li Relatio s a d Co u it E gage e t 3 (ComDev) strategy and
program, thus (ii) improving relations between Geodipa and local communities. It is envisaged
that the above reorientation (transformation) will be informed by (a) formulation of a Road Map
1
There is an overlap between the two categories – one of the land owners is also a tenant farmer at the mess PLN
site (Sugito).
2
specified by GDE.
3
consistent with recommendations in the Social Mapping & Social Engineering Report by PT Miranthi Konsultan
Permai in collaboration with Geo Dipa Energi, 2018.
2
for (building a) Development Partnership between Geodipa and local communities and (b)
improved methods to identify and strengthen livelihood security solutions and mutually beneficial
initiatives.
B. Review
1. Introduction
The Dieng Plateau straddles three Kabupaten (Banjarnegara, Batang, and Wonosobo). There are 10
villages in the Dieng Geothermal Working Area (WKP Panas Bumi Dieng). These are:
Table 1: List of Villages in the Dieng Geothermal Work Area
KABUPATEN KECAMATAN DESA (VILLAGE)

Banjarnegara Batur Bakal
Dieng Kulon
Karang Tengah
Kepakisan
Pekasiran
Batang Bawang Pranten
Wonosobo Kejajar Dieng
Jojogan
Sikunang
Land acquisition and economic displacement impacts of the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project will be
experienced by 28 households in Karang Tengah Village.
2. Some Contextual Information
General Economic Profile of Kabupaten Banjarnegara and Wonosobo

In general, the livelihoods of communities in the the Dieng area are dominated by the agricultural sector;
especially seasonal crops at an altitude of more than 1,500 meters above sea level. Agricultural crop
commodities cultivated by farmers are dominated by potato, because at these heights the potato plant
yields quite high production compared to lower altitudes. And at an altitude of less than 1,500 meters
above sea level the commodities cultivated by farmers are still quite diverse such as leeks, carrots, chillies,
potatoes and several other seasonal crops. In addition there is also a commodity crop plantation, namely
tobacco.
The most famous agricultural product in Dieng is the potato. Dieng is largest potato producing area in
Indonesia. The superior quality of Dieng potatoes is acknowledged in other provinces. Potato farming in
the Dieng region experienced a boom in the 1980s which carried on till the 2000s. At that time there was
3
a change extraordinary economy because the potato crop can produce multiple crops with not too much
capital, it will eventually also bring changes in the behaviour and views of the Dieng farming community
towards various things, instant habits and lack of awareness to preserve the environment at large. Based
on Statistic data, harvested area of potatoes in Kabupaten Wonosobo is 3,467 (Ha) in 2017 and 3,511
(Ha) in 2018. Generally, the horticulture sub sector includes vegetable and fruit plants. Highest crop
productivity vegetables are dominated by plants chayote for 3 877,62 (quintal/ ha) in 2018, the fruits has
the biggest production is salak, banana and durian. In the case of Kabupaten Banjarnegara, potato crop
productivity is the highest vegetable crop i.e 1,185,797 quintal in 2017 which decreased by 3.3% to
1,147,193 quintal in 2018.
Economic and investment potential and opportunity in the Dieng area is huge, considering that in the field
of tourism a lot can be developed such as hospitality and restaurant services as well as the small and
medium scale enterprises.
On the other hand, Wonosobo is also famous for its agricultural and plantation products. Starting from
the tea plantations that developed into Tambi Agro Tourism, Wonosobo Arabica coffee and various
vegetables, fruits, spices and other horticultural products. From year to year production for domestic and
foreign markets always increases.
Wonosobo not only produces agricultural and plantation products, its processing industry are also
developed together with work partners from both the private sector and the Wonosobo community itself.
As a result, there are many processing facilities and small and medium industries based on agriculture and
plantation produce.
Special and different from among others, the development of Carica fruit (a type of papaya typical of the
mountains) in the world only grows in 3 places; Indonesia (Dieng Mountains), Russia, and Argentina as
well as the development of Purwaceng plants (herb) for health drinks and Javanese herbal medicine. In
the field of forestry, animal husbandry, and fisheries also do not escape the attention of local governments
Dieng community economic growth in Kabupaten Wonosobo and Kabupaten Banjarnegara is shown by
the growth rate of gross ratio domestic product / GRDP. The growth rate of Kabupaten Wonosobo was
4.94 % in 2019, an increase compared to the previous year (2017) which was 3.88 % . The growth rate of
Kabupaten Banjarnegara was 5.67 % for 2017 was higher than the previous year (2016) which was 5.65
%. This increase in GRDP was triggered by an increase in the growth of the agricultural sector both food
crops, horticulture and fisheries. Kabupaten Wonoso o a d Ba ja ega a’s GRDP is dominated by
agriculture, forestry and fisheries businesses, the following table is 2019 GRDP according to type of
business:
Table 2: Types of Businesses in Kabupaten Wonosobo and Banjarnegara (2019)
Kabupaten Kabupaten
Business
Wonosobo ( % ) Banjarnegara ( % )
Agriculture, forestry and Fisheries 30.43 29.53
Processing Industry 17.40 15.06
4
Kabupaten Kabupaten
Business
Wonosobo ( % ) Banjarnegara ( % )
Big trade, retail , Car and Motor cycle workshop 16.84 14.97
Construction 6.77 -
Education Service 6.54 -
Others 40.44
The Dieng Area - The Potato Boom of the 1980s-90s and the Dynamics of Accumulation and
Dispossession
Based on a presentation by Dr. Hery Santoso on 14 August 2019, organized by the SES Consultant as part
of the IOL-SES briefing for GDE Unit Dieng staff, the IOL team, the SES team as well as the Social Safeguards
consultant, the livelihood issues faced by farmers4 in the Dieng area are very specific to the area. The
scenario is one of a boom crop in a fragile highland eco-system. Potato cultivation boomed in the 1980s
and 1990s in Dieng due to a nexus of external factors (fast food culture and the demand for potato imports
in the West), and conducive agro-economic conditions in Dieng at the time. Dr. Santoso studies map out
the rise and fall (inevitable collapse) of the potato industry in Dieng with a focus on socio-economic
i pa ts o Die g eside ts. The ai fi di gs of D . “a toso’s analysis are that (i) there is a dynamic of
systemic impoverishment happening which is causing a process of accumulation by a few farmers and the
dispossession of weaker farmers. Farmers become trapped into extensification and intensification of their
potato crops due to debt. Weaker / less competitive farmers are being squeezed out of their farms (due
to default on debts) and forced to rely more on selling farm labour, or migrating out of the Dieng area to
the less agriculturally profitable lowland areas. (ii) Capital, land and labour have become commodified.
The above scenario sustains the financial and agro-chemical industry in the area. In conclusion, any
development intervention into the area should adopt a structural approach to addressing the above
issues. The Dieng area is in need of transformation in order to support (promote and sustain) livelihood
strategies that are able to restore the degraded environment and eco-systems. (See references for other
papers by Dr. H. Santoso.)
Results of Social Mapping Exercise in 10 villages in the Dieng Geothermal Complex area
Focusing down to ten villages in the immediate vicinity of the Dieng Geothermal Power Generation
Complex, a social mapping analysis conducted in 2018 by PT Miranthi Konsultan Permai highlights the
issue of local community 5 dissatisfaction or resistance to the prese e of Geodipa in four6 out of 10
villages in their study area. The study identifies and discusses some of the sources of dissatisfaction and
resistance largel att i uted to a ide ts at Wellpads a d , dete io atio of ualit of the illages’
fresh water supply as well as diminishing water supply, and concern regarding a pond for waste water and
possible landslides.
4
who are all engaged in potato farming as their main cash crop.
5
12 villages in the Dieng geothermal work area.
6
Karang Tengah, Kepakisan, Sikunang and Pranten.
5
Impacts of Dieng-2 sub-project impacts within the above context and local politics
Further focusing down to the village of Karang Tengah where nearly all land acquisition and economic
impacts will be experienced by 28 households, field notes taken by the SES consultant describes the socio-
political networks in Karang Tengah Village (3 opposing spheres of influence), and discusses shortcomings
i GDE’s o e all app oa h to lo al o u ities hi h is at the sou e of the dissatisfa tio a d esista e
described in the above-mentioned Social Mapping report.
An extract of the SES Consultant’s 7 assessment of field conditions and potential economic impact of Dieng
Project 2 development on the local community:
i) While the number of people affected is relatively small 8, qualitatively impacts could become much
more significant depending on how these impacts influence local politics - given the tenuous
situation described above, competititon among three spheres of local political influence in trying to
se u e t a sa tio al e efits f o GDE, a d the elo opti al state of GDE’s elatio s ith the
local communities.
ii) The local situation makes things worse. In implementing the Dieng-2 sub-project, the following
social problems need to be taken into account:
a. The economic system is based on free competition between actors which results in
fluctuating commodity prices and which leads to a process dispossession (separation of
farmers from factors of production due to debt defaults) which then accumulates in the
control of a few people, and out-migration in large numbers.
b. Growth of the formal sector (financial market dominated by the private sector, chemical
fertilizer and pesticides industry) is sustained by the informal sector (agriculture) which
receives minimal State support (irrigation of crops and transportation are all based on
self-help).
c. GDE’s lo level of labour absorption from local communities.
d. GDE is considered as (foreign) and the bringer of accidents (well blowout and impacts)
and related natural problems (eg. decline in water availability and quality) which has
created a transactional and exploitative attitude towards GDE (or the Project) in order to
extract benefits.
(These issues are discussed in greater depth in the Final Report of the SES Consultant, September 2019.)
3. Review of Current Interventions

PT Geodipa has a CSR Framework and on-going Community Development program. (See Annex 1.)
There are also a number of sources of information concerning livelihoods and livelihood issues faced by
communities surrounding the Dieng Geothermal facility. These include:
7
R.Y. Zakaria (anthropologist)
8
28 households, 103 people.
6
 Social Mapping and Social Engineering Report by PT Miranthi Konsultan Permai in association with
Geo Dipa Energi, 2018. (See Annex 2 for a brief.)
 ADB, Geothermal Power Generation Project – Records of Initial Consultation with Affected
Persons, Communities, and Stakeholders, 18-26 March: 2019. (See Annex 3 for a brief.)
 ADB, Geothermal Power Generation Project – Gender Analysis (inc. Gender Action Plan), 2019.
(See Annex 4 for a brief.)
4. What local people say
Results of In-Depth Interviews with seven successful local entrepreneurs
In-depth interviews concerning experience with various successful economic activities apart from farming
were conducted with seven key informants.
Table 3: List of Key Informants
No. NAME DESCRIPTION LOCATION

1. Alif Fauzi Informal leader, Leader of local Tourism Dieng Kulon
Aware Group, tourism practitioner.
2. Iyul Carica home industry entrepreneur Karang Tengah
3. Zainal Informal village leader, Ex-Head of Village Karang Tengah
Senate, Geodipa vendor
4. Nasrullah Informal village leader, ex-Village Head of Karang Tengah
Karang Tengah, Main coordinator of 24
tenant farmers who have leased Geodipa
land for farming.
5. Herman Local entrepreneur - homestay owner / Dieng Kulon
manager and petrol pump owner.
6. Puji Astuti Local entrepreneur – local snacks (UD Tri Dieng Kulon
Sakti) and homestay manager
7. Budi Local leader / spokesman for 6 land Karang Tengah
owners affected by land acquisition.
The main points raised were:
1. Type of Enterprise
a) Type of enterprise to be developed depends on the potential and opportunities for
development. Opportunities for enterprise development in Dieng are more open because
Dieng is already a tourist destination.
7
b) Carica (local fruit crop) is in abundant supply in Dieng and constitutes a very good potential
for further development of home industries.
c) Entrepreneurs have to develop their business for at least 3 years before they can experience
the benefits.
2. Capital
a) In and around the Dieng area, investment capital is usually obtained from personal savings,
or loans from BRI and BPR Surya Yuda. Land certificates may be used as collateral. In case
borrowers do not have land certificates, a land ownership document called SPPT may be
used to secure loans of up to Rp. 50 million.
b) Capital requirements for various micro-small enterprises range from Rp. 100,000 to tens of
million. In the case of carica processing, home industries require a capital investment of
between Rp. 100,000 – Rp. 3 million.
c) The capital required is not only cash. Skills are required. Skills for starting-up and developing
small scale enterprises may be obtained from training and partnering with the Local
Tourism Development Agency (Dinas Pariwisata).
3. Markets
a) Most of the production of processed carica products are marketed in the Dieng tourism
area. The current model used is to consign products to local vendors / shops / warung (food
stalls). Once of the resource persons interviewed has established her own shop and food
counter for selling locally processed produce (oleh-oleh). Some are able to sell their
products via social media such as FaceBook.
b) Processed carica products are also sold in Wonosobo town and have reached (penetrated)
other provincial markets.
c) Local homestay operators advertise through travel websites (such as Traveloka), through
social media and also collaborate with local travel bureaus.
4. Perspective on developing alternative livelihood activities in the case of Karang Tengah Village
a) Karang Tengah Village has characteristics similar to Dieng Kulon Village which has been
successfully pioneered as a tourism destination. Challenges and obstacles that are faced are
similar to when Dieng Kulon started to develop as a tourist village.
b) The Telaga Merdada Lake has potential do be developed as a tourist destination (obyek).
However, the area needs to be properly managed spatially because it is currently full of
water pumps delivering water to potato crops in the area.
c) Collaboration with Geodipa to develop educational tourism (introduction to the geothermal
energy and extraction industry). Development of such potential will surely open up new
opportunities for local people - car park fees, souvenir shops, food stalls (warung), as well
as for the sale of local processed food products.
Results of Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with affected people
Four FGDs were conducted with affected people over 21-23 August 2019. 80% of those invited attended:
8
 The first FGD was with the Village Youth Group (Karang Taruna) and some village members (28
participants.
 The second FGD was with wives of affected households (21 participants).
 The third FGD was with 20 out of 24 tenant farmers and 4 coordinators (24 participants)
 The fourth FGD was with land owners (4 out of six attended)
The main inputs from affected people regarding livelihood restoration were:
i) Tenant farmers and wives have no objection that the land that they have been cultivating based on
an annual lease system will be used for sub-project development. However they hope to receive
compensation in an amount at lease equal to the amount they spent on land preparation in the first
instance of utilization. They also requested to be allowed to continue renting land at the site until
at least August so that the a e jo panen raya ig ha est efo e a ati g the site.
ii) Land owners who attended the FGD were not able to give a clear indication that they were willing
to sell the land to GDE. However, the matter of being given the privilege for any of their children to
be employed by GDE at a later date was discussed.
iii) Participants of the first FGD highlighted the issue of hiring of human resources at GDE. They felt that
the recruitment and selection system was not transparent. Most of GDE staff is dominated by
people from outside the area. They requested greater openness and transparency in the
recruitment and selection process of future workers. They also requested suitable training for local
youth in the required skills. Other training (and equipment) that this group requested was for
welding, making of handicrafts/souvenirs for the tourist market and sewing. There were requests
for supporting home industries in carica and potato chips (production and marketing), and
neighbourhood-based cultural groups.
iv) Both affected heads of households and their wives were not willing to leave their zones of comfort
and security. They are farmers who are typically risk averse. Although potato harvest fail from time
to time, they are not confident to attempt new livelihood strategies / activities. According to to
Santoso, they are farmers who are trapped by debt. The o e ’s FGD opi ed that the ould
rather work as farm labourers than attempt new activities with new risks that there were not
familiar with.
v) The prospect of developing the nearby Telaga Merdada (lake) as a tourism attraction was raised.
However most farmers rejected the proposal because the lake is a source of irrigation water during
the dry season. The local potato harvest at that time enjoys premium price as many other locations
where water is not readily available, are not able to plant a crop.
vi) There is a strong indication that compensation monies paid to tenant farmers will be re-invested in
renting alternative land to continue potato farming.
9
C. Assessment
Annex 5 presents an assessment based on the following methodology:

Usi g PT Geodipa’s C“R f a e o k:
1. Relevant information for a number of sources / available documents including consultations with
communities surrounding the Dieng Geothermal facilities9 was compiled.
2. The fit between livelihood related assista e a aila le u de Geodipa’s C“R f a e o k a d lo al
communities’ issues a d a ti ulated eeds as a al sed.
3. Based on in-depth interviews and consultations with the affected people, activities were
ide tified hi h ould e p o ided u de GDE’s C“R p og am under a ComDev Khusus category.
Since there are only 30 affeced households, access to these activities will be opened up to
vulnerable households in Karang Tengah as well as 5 other villages specified by GDE.10
4. Based on assessments by Zakaria, RY and in light of the problematique discussed by Santoso, H.,
recommendations will be made for an overall re-orientation of GDE CSR strategy. Strategic
activities for establishing a good foundation for planning more responsive development
interventions and better leveraging of existing funding structures in the future are recommended
11
.
1. Livelihood Assistance Packages

Annex 5 presents the intermediate assessment matrix. With due efe e e to Geodipa’s CSR pillars, and
program activities over 2018-2019, the assessment collates documented livelihood issues and needs,
reassesses recommendations, to filter the most strategic (responsive) and immediate interventions (1-3
years) for the target group (viz 28 households potentially affected by land acquisition and land clearing
activities for Dieng-2 expansion).
Livelihood restoration options mostly fall under the Geodipa Pintar (community empowering) pillar.
Based on the intermediate assessment in Annex 5, and further filtered against the results of in-depth
interviews and most importantly, FGD results with the affected people themselves, the following income
restoration assistance or activities and strategy are proposed for affected households losing land, and
losing access to rented productive land.
9
power plant, sub-station, wellpads, pipelines, inspection roads, access roads.
10
Dieng Kulon, Bakal, Kepakisan, Sikunang and Pranten.
11
The “E“ Co sulta t’s Fi al Repo t ill also contain recommendations for how Geodipa could reorientate its
approach to local communities, change its image, and reposition itself as a development partner and driver for
development of the Dieng area as a whole.
10
Table 4: Type of Livelihood Assistance & Strategy to reduce disruption to income flow
Type of Affected Type of Assistance Provided Strategy

Household /
members
Heads of land owning Negotiated compensation (based on independent Release of ownership of land to GDE
households RCS 12). expected by Aug. 2020. Land owners
have sufficient time between now
and then to identify suitable
replacement land to purchase or rent.
Able to resume full production
without significant transition period.
Heads of tenant Compensation (santunan) based on independent Current land lease (of Mess PLN site)
farmer households RCS) with reference to Presidential Decree 62/2018 will be renewed until Aug. 2020 to
– sufficient to cover a waiting period of up to 1 year. enable farmers to panen raya (big
harvest) so that they have surplus +
santunan / compensation amount to
A. Assistance with identification (mapping)
apply for renting alternative land.
and securing of alternative productive land to lease
as early as possible after vacating the mess PLN Between now and then, tenant
site. farmers have sufficient window of
time to identify suitable alternative
land to rent.
Resume economic production on new
land without significant transition
period.
▪ Affected Heads B. Priority will be given to members of affected Targeting of the family unit
households to access un-skilled labour work or (husbands, wives or family members
of Households
suitable job openings at GDE Unit Dieng for which given priority to access LR packages if
they may be qualified. Where necessary, youth will suitable).
be trained in skills consistent with future HR needs
3 year assistance package –
▪ Wives of all so that they may be equipped and eligible for
Foundation, Development, Growth.
affected employment in the future. The ComDev program
will also initiate efforts to prepare more people Implementation supported by
households facilitation NGO.
from local communities for employment at the GDE
Dieng Unit facility. Coordinated and establish synergy
1. Priority for un-skilled work over 2020 – 2022. with support provided by Kabupaten
▪ Young working 2. Priority for suitable job vacancies from 2020 Agencies interventions.
member of onwards.
affected Identification and training for potential youth in
households skills required for operational stage of Dieng-2 and
Dieng-3 (2023 onwards).
C. Scholarships and living allowance for students

of AHs.
12
RCS – Replacement Cost Study conducted by independent appraisers.
11
Type of Affected Type of Assistance Provided Strategy
Household /
members
▪ Other vulnerable D. Priority access to livelihood restoration

households in 6 activities if desired and according to preference:
villages (specified 1. Carica processing and marketing (inc. value
by GDE Corsec) chain analysis and development)
and/or 2. Potato chips, cassava chips, yam chips etc.
households processing and marketing (inc. value chain
affected by analysis and development).
unanticipated 3. Training (and provision of equipment) in
impacts during vocational skills - (a) mechanic and (b) welding.
construction.
2. Long Term Re-orientation of ComDev Program
The proposed approach for generating benefits for local communities under the Project is as follows:
i) Expand the Livelihood Restoration activities to also reach other community members (See the
last column of Table 9-1). This is to promote a perception of fairness among on-lookers.
ii) Program specific activities that were clearly raised during the September round of community
consultations. This will include:
a. Provision of 12 new wells (2 wells per village) as an immediate response to potable water
supply issues (to be implemented in 2020).
b. Participatory design and rehabilitation of water supply infrastructure. This will be done
over a 2 year time-frame (2020 – 2021).
c. Provision of periodic free health screening and follow-up medical services (from 2020
onwards), and
d. Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling, training and marketing of products for an
existing group in Sikunang Villages (2020).
iii) Reo ie tatio of GDE’s Co De st ateg a d P og a ia i stitutio al st e gthe i g of Village
Governments. Increase critical awarenss of village governents and village level activists regarding
livelihood security and ecological degradation issues, and to empower village governments to be
able to undertake strategic planning, and to feed outputs into the annual government
development planning process (Musrenbangdes as ell as a k to i fo GDE’s Co De
programming.
iv) Implementation of new livelihood security solutions based on (iii).
The rationale for the urgent eed to eo ie t GDE’s Co De st ateg a d p og a a d i deed GDE’s
o e all app oa h to the lo al Die g o u it is dis ussed i depth i the “E“ Co sulta t’s - SES
Completion Report.
The main activity identified for reorienting the ComDev Program to become more strategic (and less
philanthropic) is strengthening of local Village Government in development planning and budgeting by
12
developing a geo-social-spatial information system13 . The instrument developed for this is based on GOI
Law no. 6 / 2014 concerning Villages, and Minister of Villages, Development of Isolated Villages, and
Transmigration No. 16/2018 concerning priority for utilization of Dana Desa funds for 2019.
Strengthening of the bottom-up/participatory planning process is meant to create greater critical local
awareness of the inevitable declining state of the potato industry, diminishing carrying capacity of the
fragile highland eco-system, the process of accumulation and dispossession, in order to advocate
structural changes, and propose more strategic development interventions that will help transform local
livelihood strategies into more sustainable ones that are able to sustain levels of welfare and also
rehabilitate or at least stabilize degraded eco-systems.
The on-the-job training process for this exercise will take 4 months per village. It will be conducted by
specialist NGO services who have developed the geo-social-spatial methodology and have experience
conducting the necessary training at village-level.
The output of the exercise will be a web-based Village geo-social-spatial system (with dashboard)
established and able to be managed by the trained village cadre, a publication which Village Governments
may use to communicate with Kabupaten, Provincial Government, development partners and other
stakeholders. If the activity in each village may be successfully completed before August 2020, the outputs
may feed into the annual Government development planning and budgeting process (Musrenbangdes),
update RPJMDes14, prepare RKP15, as well as inform GDE ComDev annual programming. New and more
strategic and responsive activities emerging out of this process will enable better coordination of
development budgeting under Dana Desa / APBDes (Village Development Funds), and ComDev program
budgeting. If the process cannot be completed before August 2020, then outputs may feed into the 2021
planning and budgeting cycle.
Proposals that emerge from this process that are directed towards the ComDev program may be
accommodated as part of the reorientation of ComDev strategy and approach towards more responsive,
strategic and empowering assistance to local communities. These activities may be budged for under the
ComDev programs for 2021 or 2022 onwards.
D. Estimated Budget
Table 5 (next page) provides the estimated budget for the Livelihood Restoration and Reoriented ComDev
Program to be financed under the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project. The total estimated budget is
approximately IDR 17.464 billion (US$ 1,229.831).
13
SID – Sistem Informasi Desa (Village Information System).
14
RPJMDes – Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Desa (Medium Term Village Development Plan)
15
RKP – Rencana Kerja Pembangunan (Annual Development Work Plans)
13
Table 5: Cost Estimates for Livelihood Restoration/Enhancement & new ComDev Activities under the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project.
(Rp. million)
A. Adjust HR strategy to create
more opportunities for hiring
local people (and to create
better buy-in from the
community)
1 Priority to members of affected 24 AHs for 3 year Karang
households for suitable job period. Tengah
vacancies (2020 onwards) for 4 coordinators Karang
which they qualify. Tengah
30 HHs each from 6 6 villages *
villages/year
2 Identification, scholarships and 24 children from AHs Karang 240 240 240 240 240 1,200
training for potential youth in skills for 5 years Tengah
and higher education required for
operational stage of Dieng-2 and 30 children for 5 6 villages * 300 300 300 300 300 1500
Dieng-3 (2020 onwards). years
B. Livelihood Restoration &

Ennhancement
3 Carica processing and marketing
a) AHs 2 groups (12-14 Karang 640 14 654
women) Tengah
4 Food produce processing and

marketing
a) AHs 3 groups (18 women) Karang 640 18 654
Tengah
5 Vocational training and equipment

a) AHs 24 youth Karang 424 24 448
Tengah
14
b) Project Benefits 60 youth 6 villages * 884 66 950
C. Community Development
(Regular)
6 Digging / construction of 12 wells 2 wells / village 6 villages* 1,800 1,800
7 Free medical screening and 100 people 6 villages * 350 350 350 350 350 1,750
follow-up
8 Consolidation of waste (garbage) 6 groups 6 villages * 300 300

recycling (training, marketting)
D. ComDev Strategy & Program

Reorientation
9 Specialist NGO Services for 60 Village Cadres 6 villages 1,667 720 737 3,124
introducing geo-sosial-spatial (Village Govt., LKMD,
planning system to Village BUMDes**) and 6
Governments ** village communities
Total 7,246 3705 3110 929 890 15,876

Contingencies (10%) 724.6 370.50 311 92.9 89 1,587.60
Grand Total (Rp. Million) 7,970.6 4,075.5 3,421.0 1,021.9 979.0 17,463.6
US$ 561,309.9 287,007.0 240,915.50 71,964.8 68,943.7 1,229,831.0
Note: * 6 villages - Karang Tengah, Kepakisan, Dieng Kulon, Bakal, Pranten and Sikunang
** LKMD (Lembaga Ketahanan Masyarakat Desa - Village Community Security Institution), BUMDes (Badan Usaha Milik Desa - Village Corporation)
** Strategic livelihood security improvement activities identified by this process (from 2020 onwards, on an annual basis) will be proposed for financing by Dana
Desa / APBDes (Village Development Allocations) as well as annual GDE ComDev budgets. (Will include water supply system rehabilitation for 6 villages.)
15
E. Implementation Schedule
The implementation schedule for the livelihood restoration / enhancement and ComDev reorientation
activities and new livelihood security solutions (to be financed under the Dieng-2 sub-project) is
presented in Table 6.
Table 6: Implementation Schedule for Livelihood Restoration / Enhancement and ComDev Program
Reorientation and Activities
No. Step / Activitiy 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
1 Finalise LRA and ComDev packages
2 Prepare budget for LRP activities
3 Social preparation (identification / formation
of target groups)
4 Implementation of LRP
4.1 Training
4.2 Delivery of equipment / inputs
4.3 Access to finance (if necessary)
5 Implementation of Livelihood Restoration and
Enhancement activities (Development and
Growth) for 30 AHs and 110 vulnerable HHs in
6 villages
6 Procure services of SID++ specialst consultant
/ NGO services
7 Implementation of ComDev activities
7.1 Digging and construction of wells (12
wells, 6 villages)
7.2 Survey and Design of water supply
rehabiltation for 6 villages
7.3 Rehabilitation of water supply for 6
villages
7.4 Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling
activities (training, marketing) for 1 group
(Sikunang)
8 Provision of free health screening and follow-
up service (100 households)
9 Conduct SIDD++ (plus annual follow-up)
10 Planning and budgeting of annual
development activities for APBDes and GDE
ComDev.
11 Implementation of new livelihood security
solutions (generated by SID++) under the
Community Development Program
12 12.1 LRP / ComDev monitoring, evaluation
and reporting (inc. outcomes)
12.2 Corrective action
16
References
[1] ADB (2019). Geothermal Power Generation Project – Gender Analysis, ADB.
[2] ADB (2019). - Consultation Report. Geothermal Power Generation Project - Initial Consultation with
Affected Persons, Communities, and Stakeholders, 18-26 March: 2019
[3] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjarnegara (Agustus 2019). Kabupaten Banjarnegara dalam
Angka 2019.
[4] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Wonosobo (Agustus 2019). Kabupaten Wonosobo dalam Angka
2019.
[5] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Wonosobo (2018). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat Kabupaten
Wonosobo 2017.
[6] Kartika, Desta Leila (2019) Bank Indonesia Dukung Pengembangan Wisata di Dieng.
TribunJateng.com, Semarang (3 March 2019)
[7] Liputan6.com, Jakarta. Article about Dieng.
[8] Muzaki, Khoirul (2019). Geliat Homestay di Dieng. Petani pun nyambi jadi pengusaha penginapan.
https://jateng.tribunnews.com/2019/07/19/
[9] PT Miranthi Konsultan Permai & Geo Dipa Energi (2018). Laporan Akhir Social Mapping dan Social
Engineering di Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng
[10] PT Geo Dipa Energi. List of CSR Activities for FY 2018 and 2019.
[11] Puspita, Indira (2005). Zonasi Kondisi Kawasan Hutan Negara di Dieng dan Arahan Pengelolaan
yang Berwawasan Lingkungan. Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Fakultas Teknik Universitas
Diponegoro, Semarang
[12] Santoso, Hery (2019). (Power Point Presentation) Dieng – Perubahan Ekologi, Proses Produksi dan
Identitas.
[13] Santoso, Hery (undated). Kejayaan dan Ketersingkiran. Proses Diferensiasi di Kalangan Petani
Kentang di Dataran Tinggi Dieng.
[14] Santoso, Hery (undatedt). Pembentukan Relasi Kapitalis dalam Proses Produksi Kentang di Dieng.
[15] Umanailo, M. Chairul Basrun, M.Si (Desember 2016). Marginaslisasi Buruh Tani Akibat Asih Fungsi
Lahan. FAM Publishing. ISBN 978-602-335-215-9
[16] www.diengplateau.com. Pertanian di Dieng.
[17] Zakaria, R. Y. (August 2019). Catatan RYZ untuk perancangan program Livelihood Restoration dan
CSR dalam konteks Proyek Pengembangan Dieng-2, PT Geo Dipa Energi.
[18] Zakaria, R.Y. (September 2019). Final SES Completion Report for preparation of the Dieng-2 sub-
project Resettlement Plan.
17
Annex 1 - Geodipa’s CSR Fra e ork 16
PT Geodipa’s C“R F a e o k o p ises pilla s:
1. GeoDipa Peduli (Community Relations)

Communications with related parties in order to improved the image of the oraganisation - public
relations (sosialisasi) regarding works, provision of extension to schools, scholarships.
2. GeoDipa Maju (Community Services)

Provide community services for public good – infrastructure and facilities, support during religious
season / fetivals – sponsorhip of events, provision of subsidized foodstuffs.
3. Geodipa Pintar (Community Empowering)

Programs that provide wider access to local communities towards self-reliance:
- Empowering community members in coffee and palm sugar processing.
- Empowering community members in relation to Geo-tourism and exposure trips to areas with
successful models.
4. Geodipa Hijau (Nature Conservation)

Tree planting and maintenance with the purpose of rehabilitating the impacts of human activities on the
environment (tree planting program – 10,000 trees).
Table A provides an example of CSR / ComDev activities implemented over FY 2018 – 2019.
Table A: Co u ity De elop e t Acti ities i ple e ted u der GDE’s CSR/Co De
Program over period 2018 – 2019
GDE’s CSR Framework CSR – Community Development Activities Implemented Over

Period 2018 - 2019
Geodipa Peduli 1. Socialization re: geothermal energy (Banjarnegara)

(Community Relations)
1. Assistance to build public toilets in tourist areas.

Geodipa Maju 2. Assistance for celebrating Tourism Day in Wonosobo.
(Community Services)
3. Subsidized foodstuffs (Pasar Murah) during Ramadhan.
4. Waste management (Wonsobo)
5. Contribution to the Dieng Cultural Festival (Banjarnegara)
6. Assistance for new electricity connections (Karang Tengah)
7. Assistance for improving dwellings (Kepakisan)
16
Source : GeoDipa website.
18
GDE’s CSR Framework CSR – Community Development Activities Implemented Over
Period 2018 - 2019
8. Provision of potable water supply pipes.

9. Mosque rehabilitation and fence (Pawuhan)
10. Supported the Merdada Festival (tourism development in other
locations)
11. Support for Posyandu services (basic health care)
12. Assistance for school-going children.
13. Support for orphans.
14. Road improvements.
15. Construction of tribune (spectator seating and awning), toilets
and changing room for local football stadium.
16. Support for Dieng Geo-Park.
1. Assistance to build bridges over pipelines for farmers to better
Geodipa Pintar access their farms.
(Community
2. Construction of a space tor processing carica (local fruit like
Empowerment)
papaya).
3. Provision of livestock (cattle) to develop animal husbandry
4. Support for small and medium sized enterprises (equipment,
capacity strengthening support from local universities)
5. Provision of Carica seedlings and business training for BUMDEs
(Banjarnegara)
6. Other training for BUMDes.
7. Assistance for small enterprise – Batik Gumelem, Cahaya
Rezeki, Rumah Krepit Albaeta, agricultural enterprises.
8. Fertilizer and pesticide assistance.
9. Developing handicraft souvenirs for tourism industry.
1. Assistance for Wonosobo Green City.

Geodipa Hijau 2. Regreening (Banjarnegara)
(Nature Conservation)
19
Annex 2 - Social Mapping Report, 2018
A social mapping and social engineering report concerning the Dieng Geothermal area 17 was prepared
by PT Miranthi Konsultant Permai for PT Geo Dipa Energi in 2018.
The reason for the production of this report was to identify appropriate responses to social resistance
among local communities towards Dieng Geothermal Plant infrastructural development activities which
had its roots in impacts of the Well 30A blow-out. The report provides in-depth socio-economic analyses
of 10 village communities in the vicinity, and proposes a range of PR / social engineering actions.
“o e i fo atio f o this epo t o e i g o te t, a d the lo al o u ities’ p ofile is as follo s:
1. Economic data for Central Java Province (2016)18 – inflation rate - 0.06%, Economic
development – 5.13%. Human Development Index (70%), Poverty level (4.57%), Unemployment
rate – 4.57%, Gini ratio – 0.37.
2. Local communities in Dieng highly value communal living, mutual reliance and mutual help.
3. Community members are predominantly Muslim (> 98%).
4. Percentage (%) of school-aged children attending various levels of schools (2016 figures, average
for Kab. Banjarnegara and Wonosobo): Primary school (95.1%), Lower secondary (68.9%), Upper
secondary (39.3%)
5. Poverty
- In Kab. Banjarnegara (2016), 41% of the population in Kab. Banjarnegara belong to the
group of the lowest 40% in Indonesia. 16.8% of the population in Kab. Banjarnegara belong
to the ground of the lowest 10% in Indonesia.
- In Kab. Wonosobo (2016), 22.07% of the population are categorized as poor (pra-
sejahtera).
6. The social mapping exercise indicates that:

- local community members respect informal leaders in the 10 respective villages. Local
community members and informal leaders respect formal leaders.
- in general, the risk of social problems in the Dieng area it not high. However, there are 4
villages where the risk is relatively higher than in other villages – Desa Karang Tengah and
Desa Kepakisan (Kec. Batur, Kab. Banjarnegara), Desa Sikunang (Kec. Kejajar Kab.
Wonosobo), and Desa Pranten (Kec. Bawang, Kab. Batang). The reasons underlying this
situation are – blow-out at Well 30, landslide at Well 10, and increased salinity of water at
water sources (springs) which affected people in the 4 villages (see section 4.11.1 of the
report). Social engineering is required in these four villages to reduce the risk of conflict
and resistance towards further development of the Dieng Geothermal plant.
17
Laporan Akhir Social Mapping dan Social Engineering di Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng
18
Similar statistics not available at Kabupaten level for Kab. Banjarnegara and Wonosobo.
20
The following boxes present extracts from this report with relevant information concerning local
o u ities’ li elihoods a d li elihoods issues as ell as Village Go e e ts’ i stitutio al apa it to
19
access development benefits :
Recommendations re: Social Improvement :
1. Hasil dari wawancara terhadap aparatur desa dan tokoh masyarakat menunjukkan bahwa
masih ada aparatur ataupun tokoh masyarakat yang belum dapat melakukan identifikasi
pemanfaatan potensi desa, mulai dari potensi pertanian, potensi seni budaya dan wisata,
hingga potensi bisnis UMKM. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan ini, PT Geo Dipa Energi dapat
melakukan hal-hal berikut:
1. Bekerja sama dengan institusi pendidikan (universitas, kampus, institut) untuk
menyelenggarakan Kuliah Kerja Nyata (KKN) atau Program Pengabdian Masyarakat di
wilayah desa binaan PT. Geo Dipa Energi. Tujuan dari program ini adalah menghasilkan
proposal bisnis yang dapat digunakan oleh PT Geo Dipa Energi sebagai naskah akademik
dalam merancang program c ommunity d evelopment .
2. Bekerja sama dengan LSM atau institusi pendidikan (universitas, kampus, institut) untuk
mengimplementasikan program community development yang dirancang dari proposal
bisnis hasil KKN atau Pengabdian Masyarakat
2. Temuan lapangan setelah melakukan indepth interview dengan para aparatur desa
menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman program Pemerintah, seperti Program Dana Desa serta
BUMDes, belum dipahami secara utuh. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut, PT Geo Dipa
Energi dapat membuat sebuah proposal pemberdayaan aparatur desa sehubungan dengan
permintaan sosialisasi mengenai Program Pemerintah Dana Desa dan BUMDes.
Recommendations re: Social Enhancement
Desa Karang Tengah

3. Hasil in-depth interview yang dilakukan kepada aparatur desa dan tokoh masyarakat di Desa
Karang Tengah menunjukkan bahwa Desa Karangtengah memiliki beberapa potensi, yaitu:
i) Potensi pertanian: kentang, wortel, kubis, purwaceng, carica, dan terong belanda
ii) Potensi wisata dan seni budaya: Telaga Merdada, Grup Kesenian Rodad, Grup Sholawat
Janen (Tampil rutin di DCF), dan Grup Jepin
iii) Potensi UMKM: stik kentang, keripik kentang
iv) BUMDes: pengeloaan air bersih
4. Berdasarkan dari informasi tersebut, social enchancement yang dapat dilakukan di Desa
19
The consultant has not as yet had enough time to translate the following sections.
21
Karangtengah, antara lain:
i) Pendampingan pembentukan dan operasional BUMDes (Program GDE Pintar)
ii) Pendampingan pengelolaan air bersih (Program GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju)
iii) Pendampingan pengelolaan Telaga Merdada (Program GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju)
iv) Pendampingan kelompok tani, terutama dalam proses pengadaan bibit kentang (Program
GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju)
v) Pendampingan UMKM produksi stik kentang dan kripik kentang (Program GDE Pintar)
Desa Kepakisan
5. Hasil in-depth interview yang dilakukan kepada aparatur desa dan tokoh masyarakat di Desa
Kepakisan menunjukkan bahwa Desa Kepakisan memiliki beberapa potensi, yaitu:
i) Potensi pertanian: kentang, wortel, kubis, dan carica.
ii) Potensi wisata dan seni budaya: Pemandian Air Panas Dusun Bitingan
iii) Potensi UMKM: pengolahan carica (manisan, dodol, dll)
iv) BUMDes: mengelola Pemandian Air Panas Dusun Bitingan
6. Berdasarkan dari informasi tersebut, social enchancement yang dapat dilakukan di Desa
Kepakisan, antara lain:
i) Pendampingan kelompok tani, terutama dalam proses bercocoktanam (Program GDE
Pintar)
ii) Pendampingan kelompok wanita tani/PKK, terutama dalam proses pengolahan carica
(Program GDE Pintar)
iii) Pendampingan pembentukan dan operasional BUMDes Wisata Pemandian Air Panas
(Program GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju).
22
Annex 3 - Public Consultation Records20 including Gender Aspects
Initial public consultations were conducted over 21-23 March with 6 village communities living in the
area where the existing Dieng Geothermal complex is located. Relevant information pertaining to local
o u ities’ li elihood halle ges a d eeds i the ase of Desa Ka a g Te gah a d Desa Kepakisa
are presented below:
Karang Tengah Village

1. Karang Tengah is an old village. About 15% of the population are immigrants (pendatang). The
main livelihood activities are potato and vegetable farming and provision of farm labour. Of the
people ho pa ti ipated i the s all g oup dis ussio , t o e e la dless. .. % o
residents have land certificates whilst the other 75% possess SPPT. The average size of
landholding is 2,000 m2. The main produce is carica, chillies, potatoes, carrots, spring onions and
te o g ela da. As fa la ou e s, e ea Rp. , /da hilst o e ea Rp.
40.000/day. There are only 3 households who rear cows for beef. The group said that farming
activities do not absorb all their time; they are underemployed (nganggur) for about 50% of the
time.
2. Indicative income – Potatoes take 3-4 months to harvest. For 2,000 m2 of land, the expected
harvest is 6 tons, and the price of potatoes is Rp. 8,000/kg. Average net income per harvest –
Rp. 48 million (per 4 months) less cost of inputs.
3. Residents are not permitted to cultivate land in the protection forest administered by PT
Perhutani.
4. Participants felt the following benefits linked to the presence of the Dieng geothermal facility in
their vicinity.
- Able to enjoy electricity connections.
- Improved access to farms.
- Assistance for poor households.
5. The village community hopes that more people will be recruited by PT Geodipa to work at its
Dieng geothermal complex. Participants understand that people will be recruited based on their
competency for the positions.
6. A resident (Bpk. Patur Sahroni) who lives near Wellpad 30 has requested that PT Geodipa buy
his land (because his agriculture is continually affected by hot steam or replace / provide him
with an alternative piece of land.
20
Source: Public Consultations Notes in Patuha and Dieng (18-23 March 2019); Gender Analysis and Action Plan, R.
Pupasari, D.Novianti, May 2019.
23
7. Two hamlets (Dusun) have suffered more from pollution than the others – Pawuhan and
Simpangan. They request more CSR attention than others or other villages further away from
Dieng Geothermal facilities.
8. The community is not aware when there are any job vacancy announcements at the PT Geodipa
Dieng plant. (An on-line medium for announcing vacancies excludes village communities who
tend not to be wired.)
9. In some places, steam pipelines block the access to farms (JUT – jalan usaha tani). While there
are ladders to cross over the pipes in some places, many have rusted and cannot be used. The
community request PT Geodipa to repair the ladders.
10. Types of training requested:

- Training for SMA graduates to equip them for jobs in PT Geodipa Dieng Geothermal facility.
- Safety.
- Processing of agricultural produce (plus equipment).
- Waste recycling.
Kepakisan Village
1. Productive land is scarce. Average landholdings range from 400 - 800 m2. Many households are
landless. About 25% of residents own relatively larger landholdings (wong sugih). Based on small
group discussion, about 200 farmers share-crop on unutilized land owned by PT Geodipa. Each
person was allotted 200 m2. The primary source of income for land owning farmers is from
working their own land. The second largest contribution towards household income comes from
providing farm labour to their neighbours. The third largest contribution comes from working on
land rented from PT Geodipa. As farm labourers, men earn Rp. 50,000/day whilst women earn
Rp. 30,000 - 40.000/day. Small group discussion participants said that they may only get work as
farm labourers for about 12 days a month.
2. The tourism industry in Dieng is able to provide employment opportunities for the youth. There
are also some residents who have emigrated out of the area (eg. 20 residents have gone to
Kalimantan for work, others have gone overseas as foreign labour - TKI).
3. There is a primary school (SD) and lower secondary school (SMP) in the Village of Dieng Kulon
(or West Dieng). The closest high / upper secondary school is located in Batur (sub-district /
Kecamatan centre).
4. CSR program activities provided to residents of Kepakisan Village:

- Repair of uninhabitable houses.
- Electricity connections.
- Subsidised market (pasar murah)
- Development of hot springs facility.
24
5. There are a number of croppers cultivating Geodipa owned land. The Village Head affirmed that
these croppers understand that they would have to cease their activities if Geodipa needs to
utilize these land areas. However, he requested that they be given ample notice (at least 3
months) so that they may harvest any existing crops when they are ripe, before giving up the
land. The small discussion group also requested that PT Geodipa provide some form of
empowerment support to people who lose access to productive land.
6. Income restoration may most likely be triggered in the case of Dieng 2 expansion esp. for
farmers who are cultivating Geodipa land and whom Geodipa will request to relocate to make
way for a new project. Some small discussion group participants also suggested the possibility of
animal husbandry as there is ample vegetation for fodder.
7. Aspirations and requests:

- Support the Village in finding a solution to garbage management problems.
- Collaboration and support for the local orphans foundation.
- Provision of training for sustainable economic development.
- Repair of roads in bad condition.
- Support for small enterprises (food processing).
- More women hired by PT Geodipa at the Dieng site.
25
Annex 4 - Gender Analysis & Gender Action Plan
Gender Analysis
Relevant information for the gender analysis and action plan based on gender disaggregated meetings
conducted during the above public consultations activity discussed in Section D above are as follows:
1. Livelihoods and Income. The most common livelihood is agriculture (rice, carrots, potato and
mushroom). Other livelihoods are trading and civil servant. Both men and women may be self-
employed or employed by individual landowners. There is a different wage for female and male
laborers. Female workers earn approximately IDR 30,000 per day (± USD 2) for working from
morning to noon. While male workers earn IDR 50,000 per day (± USD 3.5/day) for working from
morning to late afternoon.
2. Education. Most villages in Dieng only have elementary schools, therefore, families have to send
children to Wonosobo (one hour from Dieng) to pursue junior and high school. For this purpose,
money is needed for transportation cost as well as living cost (accommodation and meals) if the
children stay in Wonosobo. A woman participant in the group discussion said that she has to spend
IDR , , pe o th ± U“D fo he hild’s e pe ses to sta i Dieng. Female villagers in
Dieng admitted that they have to take on additional work such as working longer hours in the farms
elo gi g to othe eigh o hood to get e t a i o e fo thei hild e ’s edu atio . I othe o ds,
o e ’s illage s ha e igge urden with family responsibilities.
3. Electricity. Both Patuha and Dieng are grid-a ea, thus illage s’ households a e ele t ified. “o e
poor households received support from CSR program for electricity installation cost. During public
consultations with GDE, villagers expressed their hope to obtain free electricity from GDE. GDE
responded that electricity distribution is not in the mandate of GDE work.
4. Clean Water. Women villagers in Dieng said that ever since the operation of GDE power plant, clean
water is difficult to obtain. This situation has caused women villagers to spend additional hours to
fetch drinking water for their families. Women in Dieng said that they could take ten minutes up to
three hours to get clean/drinking water from the nearest source. In dry season, they obtain clean
water from the neighboring villages. Alternatively, they have to buy water for IDR 25,000/gallon (±
USD 1.7). Women in Pranten Village informed that it was confirmed by dentists that the corrosive
water for brushing teeth caused their teeth to become porous.
5. Social Assistance Program. Go e e t’s so ial assista e p og a has ee dist i uted to so e of

the poor and vulnerable households in Dieng. Government social assistance for poor and vulnerable
households include education grants for children, cash transfers from the Family Hope Program
(PKH), rice from the Rice Welfare Program (Rastra); and health care from the government-financed
national healthcare insurance program (Jamkesmas) and local government-financed health
insurance schemes (Jamkesda).
26
6. Benefits from GDE. Villagers have felt the benefits from GDE presence such as improved roads, job
opportunity (generally for men), and health services (from GDE in-house health service), use of
heavy equipment/machine during natural disaster particularly landslides. Some villagers have also
e ei ed e efit f o GDE’s C“R i the fo of t ai i gs aste a age e t, food p o essi g, et . ,
infrastructure (mosque), and provision of equipment to support MSMEs.
7. Needs. Women villagers addressed the needs to improve their business. They need training on food
processing to turn agriculture commodity to quality snacks, packaging and marketing. Some of them
would also like to be trained in sewing for clothes-making as they would like to make use of their
sewing machines. In Dieng particularly, women would like to enhance their capacity in managing
homestay, including online booking, networking with tour operators, and managing finance. Apart
from trainings, women also addressed the needs for mentoring as trainings are usually conducted
for only 1 or 2 days which are not sufficient to build their capacity, therefore mentoring is needed so
that technical assistance can be continued. In addition to that, capital to start or expand their
business is also needed.
8. Expectations towards GDE. Women villagers hope to get information about job opportunities from
GDE. Some women are interested in job opportunities for unskilled positions, and some in skilled
positions. Other women are not interested in working at GDE but they are keen to serve as vendors
for GDE, such as catering and stationery supplier. They hope that job or partnership opportunities at
GDE are disseminated to women groups (PKK, posyandu, pengajian). In addition to that, women
village s ould also like to ha e i fo atio a out GDE’s C“R p og a , a el hat t pes of
program/activities that can be supported by GDE, timeline for proposal submission, and format for
proposal. Women villagers informed that GDE usually disseminate information about job
opportunities and CSR program to the village office, thus the information does not reach women
villagers.
Gender Action Plan

9. Employment opportunities. Empower the contractors to employ local labor, including women, in
project construction activities:
- Skilled and unskilled labor opportunities for women maximized (Target 10%) (Reference point:
TBC by GDE)
- Contractors agreements to include: equal pay for work of equal value, gender-related core
labor standards, special facilities for women workers and gender-inclusive awareness raising
for risk mitigation.21
10. Participation in planning. Ensure fair participation of women in public consultations to discuss GDE
CSR program.
- Public consultations held with at least 30% women participants to discuss GDE CSR programs.
(Reference point: Patuha: 23%; Dieng 24%)
21 Risks associated with large infrastructure projects could include sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human
trafficking, with women especially vulnerable to such risks.
27
- “epa ate eeti gs fo o e a e o du ted to ide tif o e ’s p io ities a d eeds fo
strengthening local organizational capacity.
11. Participation in livelihood training. Ensure fair participation of women in trainings on livelihood
activities.
- At least XX people (of whom 30% are women) reported increased knowledge and skills for
improved livelihood activities. (DMF 3b). (Reference point: Patuha: 23%; Dieng 24%)
- Trainings are conducted in locations and at times convenient for women.
28
Annex 5 – Intermediate Assessment of Responsive Livelihood Restoration Assistance Matrix
Focus on Immediate (short-

PT Geodipa’s CSR Program for 2018 & 2019 Livelihood Needs, Issues, Requests, Expectations documented Recommendations provided in various assessments / reports medium term) Strategic
CSR Framework by various assessments and reports Interventions for Livelihood
Restoration
1. Socialization re: geothermal energy 1. Disseminate information re: job opportunities for men and women
Geodipa Peduli
(Banjarnegara) (for both skilled and unskilled positions).
(Community
2. Disse i ate i fo atio e: pa t e ship oppo tu ities to o e ’s
Relations)
groups (PKK, Posyandu, pengajian).
3. Disse i ate i fo atio a out GDE’s C“R p og a di e tl to
o e / o e ’s g oups iz. hat t pes of p og a /a ti ities that
can be supported by GDE, timeline for proposal submission, and
format for proposal.
4. Due to negative impacts (pollution) experienced, Dusun Pawuhan
and Dusun Simpangan (hamlets)request more CSR attention than
others or other villages further away from Dieng Geothermal
facilities.
1. Assistance to build public toilets in tourist 1. Access to clean potable water (wo e ’s st ategi eeds
Geodipa Maju
areas.
(Community Kepakisan Village
2. Assistance for celebrating Tourism Day in
Services) 2. Support Village in finding a solution to garbage management
Wonosobo.
3. Subsidized foodstuffs (Pasar Murah) problems.
during Ramadhan. 3. Collaboration and support for the local orphans foundation.
4. Waste management (Wonsobo) Karang Tengah Village
5. Contribution to the Dieng Cultural 4. Safety.
Festival (Banjarnegara) 5. Waste recycling.
6. Assistance for new electricity connections 6. Repair of steps / ladders across pipeli es to fa e s’ fa oads.
(Karang Tengah)
7. Assistance for improving dwellings
(Kepakisan)
8. Provision of potable water supply pipes.
9. Mosque rehabilitation and fence
(Pawuhan)
10. Supported the Merdada Festival (tourism
development in other locations)
11. Support for Posyandu services (basic
health care)
12. Assistance for school-going children.
13. Support for orphans.
14. Road improvements.
15. Counstruction of tribune (spectator
seating and awning), toilets and changing
room for local football stadium.
16. Support for Dieng Geo-Park.
29
Restoration
1. Assistance for journalistic school. 1. Request from 24 tenant farmers on Geodipa-owned land (Mess 1. Empower the contractors to employ local labor, including 1. Provide access to alternative
Geodipa Pintar
2. Assistance to build bridges over pipelines PLN) - Provide access to alternative productive land for tenant women, in project construction activities. productive land for tenant
(Community
for farmers to better access their farms. farmers and croppers (penggarap) to rent. 2. Ensure fair participation of women in public consultations to farmers and croppers
Empowerment)
3. Construction of a space tor processing 2. More women hired by PT Geodipa at the Dieng site. discuss GDE CSR program. (penyewa) to rent.
carica (local fruit like papaya). 3. Open up vendor opportunities to local people / women (eg. 3. Ensure fair participation of women in trainings on livelihood 2. Improvement of existing
4. Provision of livestock (cattle) to develop catering, stationary etc.). activities. economic activities.
animal husbandry 4. “uppo t fo o e ’s usi esses. 4. Collaborate with education institutions to provide Kuliah Kerja 3. Provision of alternative
5. Support for small and medium sized 5. Training in food processing, packaging and marketing. Nyata (KKN) or Program Pengabdian Masyarakat support to livelihood opportunities –
enterprises (equipment, capacity 6. Training in sewing/tailoring for women. village communities in the Dieng Geothermal Power Plant i) livestock (cattle, goats) +
strengthening support from local 7. Training in managing home-stays, on-line bookings, networking with vicinity. The purpose is to work with the communities to training, and extension
universities) tour agents. formulate business proposals that may be considered as (abundance of fodder
6. Provision of Carica seedlings and business 8. Post-training mentoring. academic bases for programming community development. material).
training for BUMDEs (Banjarnegara) 9. Access to capital for starting-up small businesses/enterprises. 5. Collaborate with local NGOs to educational institutions to ii) small enterprise
7. Other training for BUMDes. support the communities in implementing the above community development esp. for
Desa Kepakisan
8. Assistance for small enterprise – Batik development programs. women + equipment +
Gumelem, Cahaya Rezeki, Rumah Krepit 10. Provision of training for sustainable economic development. 6. Based on indepth interviews with Village Govt personnel, it was training + mentoring
Albaeta, agricultural enterprises. 11. Repair of roads in bad condition. found that Government programs such as Dana Desa, BUMDes (souvenirs for tourists,
9. Fertilizer and pesticide assistance. 12. Support for small enterprises (food processing). are not well understood. PT Geodipa Dieng may propose to food processing, tailoring.
10. Developing handicraft souvenirs for 13. Consider animal husbandry as livelihood restoration option. Plenty empower local Government personnel by brokering additional welding, homestays)
tourism industry. of vegetation/fodder. sosialisasi ele a t Ka upate Go e e t age ies. iii) Identify and support
14. Empowerment support for those who lose access to productive development of local
land. Desa Kepakisan
potential / opportunities
7. Identify opportunities in tourism, eco-tourism. (packages) in tourism, eco-
Desa Karang Tengah
8. Develop potential for hot water springs in Dusun Bitingan, and tourism, trekking etc.
15. Training for SMA graduates to equip them for jobs in PT Geodipa BUMDES role in promoting this. (GDE Pintar and GDE Maju) 4. Training in
Dieng Geothermal facility. 9. Facilitation of farmer groups in improving agricultural i) sustainable economic
16. Processing of agricultural produce (plus equipment). practices.(Geodipa Pintar_ development;
10. Develop potential and facilitate women farmer groups and PKK ii) welding (las);
in processing carica – manisan, dodol (GDE Pintar) iii) food processing,
11. Pendampingan pembentukan dan operasional BUMDes packaging, marketing;
(Program GDE Pintar) iv) sewing / tailoring;
12. Pendampingan pengelolaan air bersih (Program GDE Pintar dan v) managing home-stays, on-
GDE Maju). line booking, networking
13. Pendampingan pengelolaan Telaga Merdada (Program GDE with tour agents.
Pintar dan GDE Maju) vi) new tourism opportunities
14. Pendampingan kelompok tani, terutama dalam proses / packages.
pengadaan bibit kentang (Program GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju) vii) Post-training mentoring.
15. Pendampingan UMKM produksi stik kentang dan kripik kentang 5. Provide capital or facilitate
(Program GDE Pintar) access to loans for starting-up
Desa Karang Tengah small businesses. (Explore
feasibility of revolving funds).
6. Explore any existing or
potential BUMDes income
30
Restoration
16. Develop cultural tourism potential - various groups (Telaga generating activities that may
Merdada, Grup Kesenian Rodad. Grup Sholowat janen, and Grup be able/developed to absorb
Jepin.) AHs.
17. Develop food processing. 7. Prioritise for employment
18. Facilitate Bumdes establishment and operations (GDE Pintar) opportunities within PT
19. P o ote Bu des’ ole i a agi g ate suppl GDE Pintar Geodipa Dieng.
and GDE Maju). 8. Provide vendor opportunities
20. Facilitation in the management of Telaga Merdada. (Program to entrepreneurs among AHs.
GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju). 9. Educational assistance for
21. Mentoring and facilitation of farmer groups particularly in children / youth to reduce
obtaining good quality potato stock for planting (GDE Pintar and financial burden on family.
GDE Maju).
22. Mentoring and facilitating UMKM in producing potato sticks and
Catherine (GDE Pintar).
1. Assistance for Wonosobo Green City.

Geodipa Hijau
2. Regreening (Banjarnegara)
(Nature
Conservation)
Other
31
Terms of Reference for Specialist NGO Services
Objective: To support GDE in (i) formulating a Development Partnership Roadmap for

GDE Dieng and local communities based on mutual benefit, and (ii) to reorient its ComDev
strategy and program activities so as to be more strategic and responsive to highland eco-
system destabilisation and livelihood challenges faced by local communities.
Scope of Work: Based on assessment of reports and relevant academic and knowledge
products produced to date, the specialist NGO will support the PMU in reorienting and
reformulating its approach and strategy for (i) public relations 1 so as to build stronger
partnership relations with local communities in order to increase community acceptance
and buy-in for geothermal development in their midst 2 and (ii) Community Development
in the Dieng area. Specialist NGO services will provide GDE with a Development
Partnership Road Map for improving relations and cooperation with local communities by
investing in more inclusive development initiatives and strategic livelihood security
solutions. The Roadmap will identify strategic investments for period 2021-2024. A
performance evaluation prior to Project completion will provide inputs for improving
ComDev program performance and for identifying future investment opportunities.
Duration: 12 months
No of personnel: 8 (maximum) 3
Detailed Tasks and/or Expected Output
Support the PMU and IAs in the following areas:

1. Compile and assess existing knowledge and information on the socio-political-
economic and ecological (state of the eco-system) situation in Dieng and the
communities in the Dieng Geothermal work area.
2. Strengthen Village Governments’ capacity for development planning through

introduction and facilitation of the development of SID+++ (geo-social-spatial
Village Information System) process and instruments4 in 6 Villages in the Dieng
geothermal work area (Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng).
i) Train 60 Village Development cadres (10 persons per village from Village
Government, LKMD and BUMDES personnel).
ii) Setting up of a web-based SID+++ system with dashboard.
1 in collaboration with the Communications Specialist.

2 consistent with social engineering recommendations of the Social Mapping & Social Engineering
Report, PT Miranthi Konsultan Permai in collaboration with Geo Dipa Energi, 2018.
3 Deployment of personnel will depend on the tasks being undertaken at the time.
4 based on GOI Law no. 6 / 2014 concerning Villages, and Minister of Villages, Development of
Isolated Villages, and Transmigration No. 16/2018 concerning priority for utilization of Dana Desa
funds for 2019
iii) Support the Villages in production of SID++ analyses and reports for each
village.
3. Based on outputs of activities 1 and 2 above, review and redesign (i) GDE’s overall
approach to one of development partnership with local communities, (ii) public
relations strategy and (iii) ComDev strategy and program.5
4. In consultation with stakeholders, formulate a Roadmap for Development

Partnership between GDE and local communities.
5. Pay especial attention to the prospects for developing tourism6 for creating new
small business and employment opportunities for local people.
6. Implementation of the reformulated public relations strategy and reoriented

ComDev program activities.
7. Performance monitoring and evaluation of outputs and outcomes to inform future

ComDev programming beyond the Project period.
Annex 1 provides a budget for provision of the specialist NGO services.
5 Outputs of the above SID++ process will also inform updating of Village Development Medium
and Short-term plans and leverage Government and other external financing for more strategic
development activities.
6 including educational tourism concerning geothermal energy and development.
Appendix 19A
Terms of Reference
Expertise Resettlement Specialist
Expertise Group
Source International
Duration: 3 months (Jakarta, Dieng, Patuha)
Objective and Purpose of the Assignment: To support the Geothermal Power

Generation Project Management Unit (GPG PMU) in (i) complying with ADB Social
Safeguards ADB SPS 2009 per Loan covenants and as specified in the Resettlement
Plan, and (ii) implementing land acquisition, livelihood restoration activities.
Scope of Work: The international social safeguards / livelihood security and restoration
specialist will have two broad tasks. (i) To assist GDE to update the Dieng-2 sub-project
Resettlement Plan and to implement the updated Resettlement Plan, and Compliance
Action Plan in the Patuha-2 Due Diligence Report. The specialist will also assist GDE to
procure NGO services and guide NGOs’ implementation of their tasks. The consultant will
be supported by a national social safeguards / resettlement consultant.
The consultant will preferably be a postgraduate in social safeguards, involuntary

resettlement or other relevant field with preferably 15 years of working in Indonesia on
social impacts in infrastructure projects. The consultant will help the PMU and concerned
sub-project units of GDE to (i) update and implement the Dieng-2 Resettlement Plan, and
(ii) to implement and monitor the Patuha-2 compliance Action Plan outlined in the Due
Diligence Report for the Patuha-2 sub-project. The consultant will also help strengthen the
capacity and institutions of GDE in social dimensions of public investments. S/he should
be able to speak, understand and write well in English. The responsibilities of the
resettlement specialist will include:
1. Review and update (if necessary) the draft Resettlement Plan for the Dieng-2 sub-
project and the Due Diligence Report for the Patuha-2 sub-project in light of the
FEED study.
2. Provide capacity building in social safeguards to social safeguards assistant
manager at GDE HQ and social safeguards focal persons at Unit level.
i) Capacity building in land acquisition to focus on:
a. explaining the prevailing legal framework (applicable laws and
regulations, technical guidance, etc.) as well as the ADB SPS 2009;
b. procedures on land acquisition depending on the type of land (e.g., forest,
government land), and on compliance with spatial planning and required
permits project location permits, forestry permits / IPPKH, dispensation
permits etc.) ;
c. land/assets valuation, consultations, budget, monitoring, transfer of
assets;
d. Assistance in preparation of technical guidance for land acquisition and
livelihood restoration assistance (if necessary).
(The training manual on social safeguards in land acquisition developed under ADB
TA 7566 and TA 8661 can be used as reference for the land acquisition capacity
building exercise.)
3. Support the PMU and sub-project PMU offices in the following stages of project
preparation and implementation:
i) in preparing for RP implementation for the Dieng-2 sub-project, and for
implementing the compliance Action Plan for the Patuha-2 sub-project.
a. Establishing and operationalizing the GRM.
b. conduct necessary Sosialisasi as indicated in the Communication and
Participation Plan for the implementation stage of the sub-projects.
ii) to implement the compliance Action Plan for Patuha-2 sub-project.
iii) to implement the updated RP for the Dieng-2 sub-project and associated
Livelihood Restoration Strategy and Plan for 30 AHs.
iv) conducting M & E of compliance Action Plan, implementation of resettlement
activities (land acquisition, fair and free negotiations, timely identification and
securing of alternative land to be rented by tenant farmers, social preparation
for accessing livelihood restoration / enhancement activities under the GDE
ComDev program.
4. The specialist will support the PMU in procurement of NGO services for facilitation
of the livelihood restoration activities for 30 AHs, and livelihood enhancement
activities for 110 vulnerable households in the 5 villages surrounding Dieng
Geothermal facility.
Appendix 19B
Terms of Reference
Expertise Resettlement Specialist
Expertise Group
Source national
Duration: ...months (Jakarta, Dieng, Patuha)
Objective and Purpose of the Assignment: To support the Geothermal Power

Generation Project Management Unit (GPG PMU) in (i) complying with ADB Social
Safeguards ADB SPS 2009 per Loan covenants and as specified in the Resettlement
Plan, and (ii) implementing land acquisition, livelihood restoration activities.
Scope of Work: The international social safeguards / livelihood security and restoration
specialist will have two broad tasks. (i) To assist GDE to update the Dieng-2 sub-project
Resettlement Plan and to implement the updated Resettlement Plan, and Compliance
Action Plan in the Patuha-2 Due Diligence Report. The specialist will also assist GDE to
procure NGO services and guide NGOs’ implementation of their tasks. The consultant will
be supported by a national social safeguards / resettlement consultant.
The consultant will preferably be a graduate in social development, involuntary

resettlement or other relevant field with preferably 10 years of working experience in
addressing social impacts in infrastructure projects. The consultant will support the
international specialist and help the PMU and concerned sub-project units of GDE to (i)
update and implement the Dieng-2 Resettlement Plan, and (ii) to implement and monitor
the Patuha-2 compliance Action Plan outlined in the Due Diligence Report for the Patuha-
2 sub-project. The consultant will also support training of key GDE personnel in social
safeguards compliance. S/he should be able to speak, understand and write well in
English. The responsibilities of the resettlement specialist will include:
1. Assist in the review and update (if necessary) the draft Resettlement Plan for the
Dieng-2 sub-project and the Due Diligence Report for the Patuha-2 sub-project in
light of the FEED study.
2. Support training in social safeguards to social safeguards assistant manager at
GDE HQ and social safeguards focal persons at Unit level.
i) Capacity building in land acquisition to focus on:
a. explaining the prevailing legal framework (applicable laws and
regulations, technical guidance, etc.) as well as the ADB SPS 2009;
b. procedures on land acquisition depending on the type of land (e.g., forest,
government land), and on compliance with spatial planning and required
permits project location permits, forestry permits / IPPKH, dispensation
permits etc.) ;
c. land/assets valuation, consultations, budget, monitoring, transfer of
assets;
d. Assistance in preparation of technical guidance for land acquisition and
livelihood restoration assistance (if necessary).
(The training manual on social safeguards in land acquisition developed under ADB
TA 7566 and TA 8661 can be used as reference for the land acquisition capacity
building exercise.)
3. Support the PMU and sub-project PMU offices in the following stages of project
preparation and implementation:
i) in preparing for RP implementation for the Dieng-2 sub-project, and for
implementing the compliance Action Plan for the Patuha-2 sub-project.
a. Establishing and operationalizing the GRM.
b. conduct necessary Sosialisasi as indicated in the Communication and
Participation Plan for the implementation stage of the sub-projects.
ii) to implement the compliance Action Plan for Patuha-2 sub-project.
iii) to implement the updated RP for the Dieng-2 sub-project and associated
Livelihood Restoration Strategy and Plan for 30 AHs.
iv) conducting M & E of compliance Action Plan, implementation of resettlement
activities (land acquisition, fair and free negotiations, timely identification and
securing of alternative land to be rented by tenant farmers, social preparation
for accessing livelihood restoration / enhancement activities under the GDE
ComDev program.
4. The specialist will support the PMU overseeing livelihood restoration activities for 30
AHs, and livelihood enhancement activities for 110 vulnerable households in the 5
villages surrounding Dieng Geothermal facility.
TEMPLATE FOR INTERNAL MONITORING REPORT
1. Project Description
This section provides a general description of the sub-project, discusses sub-project
components that result in land acquisition, involuntary resettlement, or both and identify
the project area. It also describes the alternatives considered to avoid or minimize
resettlement.
1.1 Scope of sub-project impacts

Discusses the sub-project’s impacts, and include maps of the areas or zone of
impact of project components or activities
1.2 Objectives of internal monitoring.

- Describe the aspects included in the monitoring and evaluation report
- Describe the role of stakeholders / agency in implementation of resettlement
2. Detailed Resettlement Implementation Progress
2.1 General Progress in RP implementation

Describe implementation of RP phase appropriate to RP document;
i) Social safeguards staff appointed and mobilized at Jakarta and field offices.
ii) Capacity building and training activities completed on schedule;
iii) Social preparation phase per schedule.
iv) Progress of compensation status for each sub-project component;
v) Permit status (IPPKH, lease from PTP VIII),
vi) Entitlements disbursed, compared with number and category of losses set out
in the entitlement matrix.
vii) Land acquisition and vacation of land per schedule.
viii) Achievement of resettlement, livelihood restoration and CSR reorientation /
CDP activities against agreed implementation plan.
2.2 Disclosure, Consultation and Participation

i) Describe the consultation and participation mechanism that was used during
the stages of project cycle;
ii) Summarise the results of consultations with affected persons, woman
participants, vulnerable groups;
iii) Discuss how concerns raised and recommendations made were addressed.
iv) Translation of information disclosed in the local language.
2.3 Grievance Redress Mechanism

i) Knowledge of the entitlement by the affected/displaced persons,
ii) Use of grievance redress mechanism by affected/displaced person and
iii) Timely (information) feedback concerning the resolution grievances.
iv) Performance - % of grievances invalidated, resolved, resolved within
stipulated time frame, resolved outside stipulated time frame, time taken to
resolve different types of grievances,
v) No. of grievances resolved at Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3.
vi) Number and types of outstanding grievances.
2.4 Budget and Time Frame

i) Funds allocation for resettlement to resettlement agencies on time.
ii) Fund disbursement according to RP and DDR on time.
iii) Receipt of resettlement funds by IA and beneficiaries in a timely manner.
2.5 Income Restoration Program

i) No. of AHs who successfully secured new land to lease / purchase 3-9 months
of vacating mess PLN or relinquishing acquired land to GDE.
ii) No. of AHs who did not replace land, and reasons for not doing so.
iii) No. of beneficiaries per each type of activity including employment
opportunities (total, men, women, Priority 1 AHs, Priority 2 AHs, Priority 3 and
4 AHs.)
iv) Extent of AH participation in activities (by Priority level)
Describe percentage of successful enterprises:
v) Breaking even,
vi) Profitable and able to improve AHs’ standard of living.
vii) Describe degree of satisfaction with support received for livelihood programs.
2.6 Benefit Monitoring

Using the SEC database as baseline data on socio-economic conditions of AHs
prior to sub-project implementation, describe changes, benefits received /
experienced from the sub-project by affected/displaced persons:
i) Describe the characteristics of replacement land AHs were able to lease /
purchase using compensation funds.
ii) Has cultivation of replacement land been able to restore AHs cash flow ? To
what extent ? (Compare against baseline production information).
iii) Noticeable changes in patterns of production and resource use compared to
pre-project situation;
iv) Changes of income and expenditure patterns compared with pre-project
situation;
a. Key Indicator – amount of annual alms (zakat) paid. (Establish
baseline for annual zakat payments per AH)
v) Changes in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standard.
a. Changes in amount of donation for Sabtu Wage celebrations.
(Establish baseline/pre-project amount/level of contributions per AH)
vi) Changes that have occurred to all AHs, with particular attention to Priority 1
AHs.
vii) Evaluate and recommend how to improve performance.
3. DDR Action Plan

Assess timely implementation of Action Plan.
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Geothermal Power Generation Project (Dieng-2 Expansion Facilities)
External Monitoring Agency for Post RP Implementation Evaluation
A. Background
1. The Republic of Indonesia has the world’s largest geothermal potential, estimated at
29,000 MW. Since the issuance of the Geothermal Law in 2003, the Government of Indonesia
(GOI) has prioritized development of this resource. As of January 2019, the installed capacity
of geothermal energy in Indonesia was 1,948.5 MW (6.72 % of total potential). In the RUPTL1,
the government plans for an additional 4,443 MW of installed geothermal capacity by 20272.
The government also intends for state-owned enterprises, such as PT PLN (Perusahaan
Listrik Negara – State Electricity Company) and PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE), to play an
important role for sustaining geothermal growth in the near term.
2. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide a loan to GDE to support expanded
geothermal electricity generation in Java to increase renewable energy baseload and reduce
Indonesia’s reliance on coal. The proposed GPGP will provide financing for expanding
geothermal power generation via the Dieng-2 sub-project – expansion of geothermal electric
generating capacity by 55 MW at the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant. Dieng 2 project is
located in the Districts of Wonosobo and Banjarnegara, Central Java Province
3. The Dieng Geothermal Expansion sub-project (Dieng-2) will include drilling of new
wells for geothermal fluid production and re-injection, and development of a steam above
ground gathering system and fluid re-injection lines connecting wells and generating units.
The sub-project will also support the transmission interconnection systems between the plants
and the grid; this will include a new, 6-km underground transmission line to the Dieng Sub-
station. The expansion of the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant will require a total of 308,289
m2 (30.83 ha). Of this, 305,279 m2 (99 %) is already owned by Geo Dipa, while 3,010 m2 is
privately owned land.
4. Land acquisition and clearing will be required for two sub-project components, i.e (i)
Acquisition of 3,010 m2 of privately owned land for a new pipeline and access road from
Wellpad 9 to Geodipa-owned proposed site for Dieng-2 power plant which will be conducted
through negotiated land acquisition as the land to be acquired is a relatively small plot3. ADB
policy related to negotiated settlement applies; (ii) Land clearing (of GDE-owned land being
used by 23 households for farming) for the construction of power plant will be in accordance
with involuntary resettlement. Principles on involuntary resettlement safeguard of ADB SPS
and prevailing Indonesian legal framework will apply.
5. The project is categorized as B for Involuntary Resettlement in accordance with ADB’s
Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS 2009)4 .However, considering the high number of severely
and vulernable APs and the concerns of APs regarding project impacts to their livelihood, the
PMU will engage a qualified external monitoring agency or individual social safeguard
1 Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) 2018–2027 (Electricity Power Supply Business Plan 2018–2027).
2
An increase of 15.32 % vis a vis total potential.
3
Presidential Regulation 148 of 2015 stipulated that land acquisition less than 5 hectare can be undertaken through direct
transaction with the land-owners
4
The project is considered category A if 200 or more persons experience major impacts, which are defined as (i) being
physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive (income generating) assets .
monitoring expert to carry out external monitoring and post-implementation evaluation. The
first external monitoring will be carried out 6 months – 1 year after compensation payment,
while post-resettlement evaluation will be carried out after the completion of livelihood
restoration program.
B. Objective
6. The main objectives of independent monitoring and evaluation are to:
(i) Verify results of internal monitoring.
(ii) Verify the negotiation and settlement process for negotiated land acquisition
(iii) Assess whether resettlement objectives as stated in the resettlement plan
(RP)/updated RP have been met, and if not to suggest corrective measures.
(i) Monitor and evaluate whether land acquisition and involuntary resettlement
activities are implemented in accordance to the RP/Updated RP and d complies
with project resetllement principles/ADB SPS.
(ii) Assess whether the livelihood and the standard of living of affected persons (APs),
including those of the non-titled displaced persons, have been restored or
improved. Special attention needs to be given to the vulnerable groups and
severely AHs. If they were found to be worse off, analysis on the main cause needs
to be done and specific remedial actions need to be proposed.
(iii) Advise GDE on social safeguard compliance issues from the monitoring and how
to resolve them.
C. Scope of Works
7. The EMA will conduct the evaluation study at two times during the project
implementation period: (i) first monitoring conducted 6 months to 1 year after compensation
payment; and (ii) second monitoring after the Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP) has
completed.The task of the EMA will focus on the resettlement compliance and assessment of
the degree of rehabilitation achieved by the APs in the year following RP implementation. The
EMA will have access to all the offices involved in the implementation of the sub-project RP
and all project documentation. The EMA will conduct the following activities;
a. Review the baseline data, social and economic survey, and related indicators indicated
in the RP/Updated RP.
b. Review the negotiated land acquisition process and verify that negotiations were
conducted in a transparent manner, and that parties involved in the negotiations had
equal bargaining power.
c. Monitor and evaluate whether land acquisition and involuntary resettlement activities
including update of RP, compensation and assistance, mitigations for impacts duting
construction, meaningful consultations and disclosure, GRM, livelihood restoration
program, institutional arrangement including capacity building training, adequacy of
budget, internal monitoring have been timely and properly implemented in a satisfactory
way in line with the project resettlement policy/ADB requirements.
d. Assess the livelihood impact of the land acquisition/resettlement on the APs as well as
non-affected members of the population in the sub-project area. The assessment should
be inclusive of gender concerns.
e. Assess longer term satisfaction with the valuation of assets and entitlements, timing of
payments, fund availability and disbursements
f. Assess the long-term efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the land
acquisition/resettlement program, drawing lessons for future resettlement policy
formulation and planning and future RP planning and implementationPreparation of the
evaluation report based on the assessment and incorporate all documents during the
evaluation including meetings/interviews with the APs both men and women, evaluation
instruments, etc.
8. If the findings of the study indicate that the objectives of the RP/Updated RP have not
been achieved, the EMA will propose appropriate additional measures to help the severely
affected APs rehabilitate themselves to at least their pre-project situation. The EMA will
likewise provide recommendations for improving resettlement implementation in the future
D. Methodology
9. The methods for external monitoring activities will consist of the following :
i. Review of internal monitoring reports and other relevant reports.
ii. Review of Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) process to be able to establish a
baseline for monitoring and evaluating project benefits. The EMA to check and
evaluate the DMS process to determine and assess if the DMS activities was carried
out in participatory and transparent manner.
iii. Review of payment vouchers and other forms of compensation disbursed to
APs to ensure full compliance with the requirements of the RP/Updated RP.
iv. Review of socio economic data 5 prepared during the project preparatory technical
assistance (PPTA) and included in the RP/updated RP.
v. Carry out the resettlement survey to all APs to capture their perception or opinion
and suggestions on the land acquisition and involuntary activities and it’s impacts to
their living standard. The data will disaggregrate information by gender.
vi. Interview with relevant stakeholders and focus group discussions (FGDs) on specific
topics such as compensation payment, assistance, income restoration programs,
and their satisfaction with current economic activities. Special attention will be paid
to the vulnerable groups: the poor, women, elderly, disable, APs without land title,
and landless. The interview and FGD will also focus on good practices in land
acquisition and involuntary resettlement objectives, approaches and implementation
strategies.
10. Indicators for external monitoring and evaluation as well as verification of negotiated
land acquisition can be seen in the table below
Table 1. Indicators for External Monitoring and Evaluation

1. Basic  Location
information on  Composition and structures, ages, education and skill levels
AP households  Gender of household head
 Ethnic affiliation
 Access to health, education, utilities and other social services
 Housing type
5 Possible data sources include: census, IOL, socioeconomic survey, village records/documents.
 Land use and other resource ownership patterns
 Occupation and employment patterns
 Income sources and levels
 Agricultural production data (for rural households)
 Participation in neighborhood or community groups
 Access to cultural sites and events
 Value of all assets forming entitlements and resettlement
entitlements
2. Benefit  What changes have occurred in terms of patterns of occupation,
Monitoring production, and resource use compared to the pre-project situation?
 What changes have occurred in income and expenditure patterns
compared to the pre-project situation?
 What have been the changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project
situation?
 Have APs’ incomes kept pace with these changes?
 What changes have taken place in key social and cultural parameters
relating to living standards?
3. Restoration of  Were valuations for all types of affected assets based on replacement
Livelihoods cost principles
 Were compensation payments free of deduction for
depreciation, fees or transfer costs to the APs
 Were compensation payments sufficient to replace lost assets?
 Was sufficient replacement land (of suitable standard) available
?
 Did income substitution allow for re-establishment/restoration of
livelihoods and living standards/
 Were affected public facilities compensated or replaced ?
 Have vulnerable groups been provided income-earning
opportunities? Are these effective and sustainable?
 Do jobs provided restore pre-project income levels and living
standards?
4. Levels of AP  How much do APs know about resettlement procedures and
Satisfaction entitlements?
 Do APs know their entitlements?
 Do they know if these have been met?
 How much does the APs participate in the public consultation meetings to
discuss and reach agreements on project potential impacts,
compensation, assistance, and relocation?
 How do APs assess the extent to which their own living
standards and livelihood have been restored?
 How much do APs know about grievance procedures and
conflict resolution procedures? How satisfied are those who
have used said mechanisms?
5. Effectiveness of  Were the APs and their assets correctly enumerated?
Resettlement  Were any land speculators assisted?
Planning  Was the time frame and budget sufficient to meet objectives?
 Were entitlements too generous?
 Were vulnerable groups identified and assisted?
 How did resettlement implementers deal with unforeseen
problems?
6. Other impacts  Were there unintended environmental impacts?
 Were there unintended impacts on employment or incomes?
 Were there any unintended impacts on Geodipa ?
Table 2. Verification of Negotiation and Settlement Process for Negotiated Land Acquisition
No Principle Criteria Yes No Findings/Remarks

1 Meaningful Were APs consulted during RP
consultation with the preparation and implementation. If yes,
affected persons please explain the number of
including those participation and what stage of
without legal title to consultation conducted (planning and
assets implementation).
Did the APs receive clear and adequate
information on the project plan and its
potential impacts including requirement
on land acquisition?
Did the APs know about negotiated land
acquisition procedure and their
entitlements?
Did the APs participate in the Inventory
of Losses carried out by PPTA team and
/Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) by
GDE Land Acquisition Team (LAT)?
Was there any freedom for APs to
express their opinion and suggestions
on the project and land acquisition?
Did APs know how to raise the
complaints/grievance, if any. Is there
any adequate and timely response to
the complaint?
Is there any booklet /written information
related to project and land acquisition
plan and involuntary resettlement
distributed to the APs and stakeholders?
Did women participate in the
consultations and any attention to the
vulnerable groups?
If any land users on the land to be
purchases, were they consulted?
2 Offer of adequate and Was compensation rate offered based on
fair price for land valuation by independent appraiser or based
and/or other assets. on replacement cost principles?
Compensation
provided at Were compensation payments free of
replacement cost deduction for depreciation, fees or
transfer costs to the APs?
principle
Did the APs receive the compensation
rate fully soon after the negotiation
achieved?
3 Negotiation of Was there any negotiation process for

compensation with compensation rate?
the landowners will
be conducted in Is there any another option offered for
transparent manner the compensation form, in addition to
cash compensation? If yes, please
explain?
Has the APs freedom to exit from the
negotiation if no agreement on
compensation rate achieved?
Did APs know about valuation of
compensation rate recommended by
appraiser used for the negotiation?
4 Documentation of Were there any proper records on
recording of the consultations and other process of land
process of negotiated acquisition? Including grievance
land acquisition handling, if any.
including consultation Does agreement is properly
activities and documented with signatures of APs,
negotiation of name of the borrower/client, and
compensation witnesses?
Get the copy of all Whether land transactions are support
records by transfer of tittles?
E. Qualifications/Experience of EMA
11. The PMU shall engage an agency from NGOs, academic institutions, consulting firms,
or individual social safeguard monitoring expert. In case of a Non-Government Organisation,
the institution should be formally registered as an association, foundation or society or other
acceptable form. They should be active on a professional level in the field social safeguards,
with the capacity to provide the scope of work expressed in this TOR in the sub-project
location. The EMA/expert should have prior experience in conducting external resettlement
monitoring or evaluation for development projects. Familiarity with the ADB Safeguards Policy
2009 is a pre-requisite for selection.
F. Key Professional Specialists

12. The EMA/Individual experts for each monitoring will consist of the following
1. Team Leader (Social safeguard or monitoring Specialist) – 2 months
The Team Leader will: (i) provide overall organization and management of the Team and
for supervising the work associated with data collection and analysis (including the
household surveys) and analysis (ii) guide, supervise, and coordinate the work of all team
members (iii) take overall responsibility for preparing reports and consolidating reports
prepared by all team members; (v) liaise communication with the ADB and GDE PMU.
Preferred qualifications of the Team Leader include:
 A Master’s degree in social science or economics,
 At least 8 years working experience in social safeguards or other relevant field
experience. (Work experience in and familiarity with all aspects of involuntary
resettlement operations would be desirable.)
 Experience in working in the government infrastructure construction project,
 Proficiency in social impact assessment and implementation of ADB SPS
(Safeguard Policy Statement) and other the international standards of
involuntary resettlement
 Able to work independently under minimum supervision
 Good analytical skills, interpersonal and teamwork skills, able to manage the
resettlement team of the project that is working with the government
 Excellent proficiency in English (oral and writing) and document preparation
2. Resettlement Specialist– 1,5 months

The Resettlement Specialist will work with the Team Leader to support in conducting
monitoring of resettlement process, specifically to conduct social impact analysis of the
AHs after the resettlement process.
Preferred qualifications of the Socio-economic Specialist include
 A bachelor degree in social sciences or economics.
 At least 5 years working experience in social safeguards or other relevant field
experience.
 Proficiency in social impact assessment and implementation of ADB SPS
(Safeguard Policy Statement) and other the international standards of
involuntary resettlement
 Excellent proficiency in English (oral and writing).
3. A data processing specialist (2 weeks) with at least 3 years in compiling and analyzing
survey data.
G. Reporting
13. The EMA will prepare the following reports to be submitted to the PMU and ADB:
i. Inception Report
Prepare and submit an Inception Report, within 10 days from commencement of
services. This report include monitoring methodology statement and instruments and
implementation time schedule.
ii. Draft External monitoring report/post evaluation report
The draft report includes monitoring/evaluation findings as indicated in the monitoring
objectives and scope of works (para 6 – 7) and recommendations. The draft report is
submitted to GDE and ADB for review
iii. Final External monitoring report/Post-resettlement evaluation report.
The draft report needs to be finalized by incorporating comments/review provided by
GDE, ADB, and other relevant parties. The final report is submitted to GDE and ADB
for review and acceptance. The accepted report be disclosed on GDE and ADB
websites.
Table 2. Tentative Schedule
2020 2021 2022 2023

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Mobilization of EMA X X
Inception Report X X
Draft Reports X X
Final Reports X X

Geothermal Resettlement Plan Dieng

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geothermal Resettlement Plan Dieng

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geothermal Development Project (RRP INO 52282)

Draft RESETTLEMENT PLAN

INO: Proposed Geothermal Power Generation

Prepared by PT Deo Dipa Energi

1. Status of Land Certification Process for GDE-owned land

III. LIST OF FIGURES

ADB Asian Development Bank

VI. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Project Description. To support expanded geothermal electricity generation in Java the

5. Socio-economic Context in Dieng. Agriculture, particularly potato farming is the main

2 Capacity values in this document refer to net generating capacity

6. Socio-economic Profile of AHs. A socio-economic survey (SES) of 28 households

10. Communications and Complaints. AHs preferred project communications to be

12. Grievance Redress Mechanism. A grievance mechanism has been established to

14. Entitlements and Compensation. Landowners will be entitled to compensation based

9 All vulnerable households will also be potentially severely affected.

2. PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) is a state-owned geothermal company focused on exploration

VIII. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

B. Due Diligence concerning land owned / leased by Geo Dipa

LOCATION OWNER OF REQUIRED AREA #

2 Underground 4 villages - GDE + 6,000 2 + 12,000 No

LOCATION OWNER OF REQUIRED AREA #

C. Inventory of Losses (IOL)

15 There are 4 coordinators.

a. Wellpads 10, 7, 9, 30 and 31;

Figure 3. Map of the Dieng-2 Sub-project

21. Loss of Structure. No structures will be affected.

Table 3. Severely Affected Households

STATUS No. of AHs

Table 4. Vulnerable Affected Households

Type / Combination Of No. of Tenant No. of Land Owning Total no. of

Type / Combination Of No. of Tenant No. of Land Owning Total no. of

Table 5. Summary of Impacts due to Land Acquisition and Land Clearing

Total land Requirements

IX. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE AND PERCEPTIONS OF AFFECTED PEOPLE

A. Profile of Karang Tengah

Appendix 10 presents a description of Karang Tengah Village. Table 6 provides a summary

Table 6. Profile of Karang Tengah Village

B. Summary of Socio-economic Survey Findings

27. Education. Educational attainment of 28 respondents is presented in Figure 4. Educational

27 The survey was a census of all affected households.

Figure 4. Educational Attainment of Respondents

28. Education attainment of 95 AH members is presented in Table 5. 52.6% of affected

Figure 5. Educational Attainment of Affected Household Members

Figure 6. Primary Occupation of AH Members

Note: * Occupations of 15 household members were not documented

Number of gainfully employed members of the

Figure 7. Dependency Ratio of AHs

Combined Monthly Income of AHs (in Rupiah)

<400,000 400,000-poverty line

29 These include cough and cold/flu, headaches, indigestion, and sprains.

Figure 9. Location of medical services in relation to AHs:

Location of medical services in relation to AHs

14% Same village of the AH

In another village in the same

Figure 10. Source of Water Supply for Drinking and Washing

Source of potable water Source of water for washing

Figure 11. Garbage Disposal Practices among the AHs

15% Buried by the AH

32% Collected by local

38. The above-discussed issues will be addressed by GDE’s CSR/Community Development

AHs’ Perception of the Proposed Sub-project

AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion

Beneficial Negative Impact No Opinion