Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capella University
Instructor’s Name
Date
2
Medical education has changed rapidly to adapt to the technical aspects that have
constantly been evolving so that medical learners can be given what they need to give quality
service to patients. This paper discusses the scope of changes in medical education from 1800 to
today, along with the impact of technologies on medical training. Then the cultural and mandated
changes would be discussed. The academic and apprenticeship models will be discussed and
their similarities and differences. Then the evolution of these models would be studied, and the
quality of patient care they have brought. Then the paper will be concluded by stating the
importance of learning medical history.
The Changing Scope of Medical Education
In the early 1800s, the nursing school began in America; there were only four foreign
doctors at the time: the University of Philadelphia, which was founded in 1765, followed by
King's College in 1967, Harvard in 1782, and Exeter, which was founded in 1797 before the year
1800. Following the year 1800, history indicates between the years 1810 and 1876, seventy-three
local schools were established, with the training offered during this period being uncontrolled. In
1876, the American Medical Group was established, and it established standards to oversee the
medical curriculum (Wright, 2015). Those who wished to practice medicine had to enroll in
medical school. New legislation was introduced that required all people to study and receive a
four-year degree and complete refresher courses in the medical area when they qualified to be a
professional and were permitted to practice medicine. Medical schools were supplementary to
the internship system at the time. Still, as the schools developed and delivered systematic
training, the journeyman system was phased out and replaced with a structured method, which
became the only mode of clinical school. The medical course was just eight months long in the
mid-nineteenth century, and the curriculum consisted of seven courses: medicine, human
revolutionary movement thought they would eradicate the medical institutions, physicians, and
hospitals. Still, quite the opposite happened, and it gave rise to a new era of autopsies and
3
observing the experimentations (Morton, 2014). Poorly trained doctors used to open their
schools with improper training facilities. Still, this trend changed later on, and even women had
an opportunity to attend the medical hospitals that were not allowed previously.
In the early twentieth century, the nursing school faced a problem: the obligation to
academic research in healthcare. The term "residency," which refers to multiple years of
experience in a specific hospital setting assessed by the internship program, was used. The
contemporary residency system was first established in America in 1889, with the inauguration
of John Hopkins University (Morton, 2014). This was the instructional experience for the older
students in internal medicine. During World War I, the Hopkins residence system extended to
other colleges. Around the 1930s, resident training had become the only opportunity for doctors
to specialize. This took the place of some of the more ad hoc approaches to specializations
previously adopted.
Previously, the education system had taken medical experience, implemented for a three-
year term. Medical students studied medicine under the supervision of a general surgeon who
always allowed the apprentice to participate in his clinical work in exchange for a fee and to help
with other non-medical tasks. Because there was no established or formal process for trying
different physicians once they completed their apprenticeships, surgeons offered to train other
practitioners on a trainee basis (Jones, 2015). There were no rules in place at all. This continued
until the mid-eighteenth century, when hospitals were established. Following the end of their
The academic approach was created to have physicians who could problem-solve and
analyze critically and study and self-evaluate material. This was the finest aspect of having a
system of education that encouraged identity and practical learning through lab work and clinical
testing, making learners more engaged in their studies than previously.
Importance of Understanding History of Medicine
Because medicine and surgery are advancing rapidly, it's important to learn from great
accomplishments and disappointments. Once they grasp the past, they will be able to produce
high-quality professionals in the medical area in the future. They currently have information due
to history, which has also shown us why we undertake study and how important it is. History has
also offered us valuable lessons about how society interacts with healthcare and what might go
wrong in the medical industry. People and early organizations who contributed to the creation
and enhancement of medical education are remembered in history (Rothman, 2017). One can't
reform or enhance the healthcare system without first understanding its origins and background.
Conclusion
Nursing school has come a long way from its inception in the 1800s. History has aided in
the advancement and knowledge of medicine and the development of improved medical policy
for society. The medical sector will always progress, and all of the past errors and
accomplishments have been used to better medical research. This sector will continue to progress
in the future, as information is fast evolving, and health care systems must adapt to the changing
world.
References
Wright, D., Ispas, C. A., Poon, L. C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2015). Mean arterial pressure in the
Linet, M. S., Vajdic, C. M., Morton, L. M., De Roos, A. J., Skibola, C. F., Boffetta, P., ... &
Chiu, B. C. (2014). Medical history, lifestyle, family history, and occupational risk
Jones, D. S., Greene, J. A., Duffin, J., & Harley Warner, J. (2015). Making a case for history in
medical education. Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences, 70(4), 623-652.
Rothman, D. J. (2017). Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed