Weekly test - AI

Introduction to
Alternative Investments
LOS 47.a: Describe types and categories of alternative investments.

Alternative investments comprise various types of investments that do not fall

under the heading of traditional investments, which refers to long-only
investments in cash or publicly traded stocks and bonds.

Managers of alternative investment portfolios may use derivatives and leverage

and short securities.

Many types of real estate investment are considered alternatives to traditional

investment as well.

Alternative investments typically are actively managed and may include

investments in commodities, infrastructure, and illiquid securities.

Fee structures for alternative investments are different from those of traditional
investments, with higher management fees on average and often with additional
incentive fees based on performance.

Alternative investments typically exhibit several of the following characteristics:

Less liquidity of assets held.

More specialization by investment managers.
Less regulation and transparency.
More problematic and less available historical return and volatility data.
Different legal issues and tax treatments.
Relatively low correlations with returns of traditional investments.
Relatively higher management fees and incentive fees based on performance.
Restrictions on redemptions.
Relatively more concentrated portfolios.
Although correlations of returns on alternative investments with returns on
traditional investments may be low on average, during periods of economic
stress, these correlations may increase significantly.

Several categories of alternative investments in detail in this topic review.

Here we introduce those categories:

Hedge funds Private equity. Private debt.

Real estate. Commodities Farmland. Timberland.

Infrastructure
294 Reading 47 ■ Introduction to Alternative Investments

Question 3
Relative to traditional investments, alternative investments are least likely to
be characterized by:
A high levels of transparency.
B limited historical return data.
C significant restrictions on redemptions.

Solution:
A is correct. Alternative investments are characterized as typically having low
levels of transparency.
Question 4
Alternative investment funds are typically managed:
A actively.
B to generate positive beta return.
C assuming that markets are efficient.

Solution:
A is correct. There are many approaches to managing alternative investment
funds, but typically these funds are actively managed.
Question 5
Compared with traditional investments, alternative investments are more likely
to have:
A greater use of leverage.
B long-­only positions in liquid assets.
C more transparent and reliable risk and return data.

Solution:
A is correct. Investing in alternative investments is often pursued through such
special vehicles as hedge funds and private equity funds, which have flexibility
to use leverage. Alternative investments include investments in such assets as
real estate, which is an illiquid asset, and investments in such special vehicles as
private equity and hedge funds, which may make investments in illiquid assets
and take short positions. Obtaining information on strategies used and identifying
reliable measures of risk and return are challenges of investing in alternatives.
Question 6
The potential benefits of allocating a portion of a portfolio to alternative invest-
ments include:
A ease of manager selection.
B improvement in the portfolio’s risk–return relationship.
C accessible and reliable measures of risk and return.

Solution:
B is correct. Adding alternative investments to a portfolio may provide diver-
sification benefits because of these investments’ less-­than-­perfect correlation
with other assets in the portfolio. As a result, allocating a portion of one’s funds
to alternatives could potentially result in an improved risk–return relationship.
LOS 47.b: Describe characteristics of direct investment, co-investment, and fund
investment methods for alternative investments

Direct investing refers to an investor that purchases assets itself, rather than
pooling its funds with others or using a specialized outside manager. Larger,
more knowledgeable investors may purchase private companies or real estate on
their own

Direct investing has advantages in that there are no fees to outside managers
and the investor has more choice and control over the investments made

Fund investing refers to investing in a pool of assets along with other investors,
using a fund manager that selects and manages a pool of investments according
to an agreed upon strategy. (individual investors do not control the selection)

The advantages of investing through a fund, compared with direct investment,

include having the expertise of the fund manager, less involvement and
expertise required of the investor, diversification across investments made by
the fund, and lower minimum investment requirements.

With co-investing, an investor contributes to a pool of investment funds (as with

fund investing) but also has the right to invest directly alongside the fund
manager in the assets in which the manager invests.

Co-investing can reduce overall fees, while benefiting from the manager’s
expertise, and provide the investor with more control over asset selection and
management. Compared with fund investing, it requires greater expertise, due
diligence, and involvement with asset management.
302 Reading 47 ■ Introduction to Alternative Investments

Solution:
C is correct. From the perspective of the investor, direct investing is the most
active approach to investing because of the absence of fund managers and the
services and expertise they generally provide.
A is incorrect because co-­investing includes fund investing, which requires
less due diligence compared with direct investing.
B is incorrect because fund investing in alternative assets demands less
participation from the investor compared with the direct and co-­investing
approaches because an investor depends on the fund manager to identify, select,
and manage the fund’s investments.
Question 2
In comparison to other alternative investment approaches, co-­investing is most
likely:
A more expensive.
B subject to adverse selection bias.
C the most flexible approach for the investor.

Solution:
B is correct. Co-­investing may be subject to adverse selection bias. For example,
the fund manager may make less attractive investment opportunities available
to the co-­investor while allocating its own capital to more appealing deals.
A is incorrect because co-­investing is likely not more expensive than fund
investing since co-­investors can co-­invest an additional amount alongside the
fund directly in a fund investment without paying management fees on the
capital that has been directly invested.
C is incorrect because direct investing, not co-­investing, provides the greatest
amount of flexibility for the investor.
Question 3
Relative to co-­investing, direct investing due diligence is most likely:
A harder to control.
B more independent.
C equally thorough.

Solution:
B is correct. Direct investing due diligence may be more independent than
that of co-­investing because the direct investing team is typically introduced
to opportunities by third parties rather than fund managers, as is customary
in co-­investing.
A is incorrect because the direct investing team has more control over the
due diligence process compared with co-­investing.
C is incorrect because due diligence for direct investing requires the investor
to conduct a thorough investigation into the important aspects of a target asset
or business, whereas in co-­investing, fund managers typically provide investors
with access to a data room so they can view the due diligence completed by the
fund managers.
LOS 47.c: Describe investment and compensation structures commonly used
in alternative investments.

limited partnerships. general partner (GP) limited partners (LPs)

Partnership Agreement Side Letters

management fee and an incentive fee

For hedge funds, the management fees are calculated as a percentage of

assets under management (AUM), typically the net asset value of the fund’s
investments.

For private equity funds, the management fee is calculated as a percentage

of committed capital, not on capital invested.

Committed capital is typically not all invested immediately but is “drawn

down” (invested) as securities are identified and added to the portfolio.
Committed capital is usually drawn down over three to five years, but the
drawdown period is at the discretion of the fund manager. Committed
capital that has not yet been drawn down is referred to as dry powder.

Hurdle Rate - Soft Vs Hard

A catch-up clause in a partnership agreement is based on a hurdle rate and is
similar in its effect to a soft hurdle rate. Consider a fund with returns of 14%, a
hurdle rate of 8%, and a 20% incentive fee. A catch-up clause would result in
the first 8% of gains going to the limited partners and the next 2% going to the
general partner, allowing the general partner to “catch up” to receiving 20% of
the first 10% of gains. After the catch-up, further gains are split 80/20 between
the limited partners and the general partner.

high-water mark.
Thus, incentive fees are only paid to the extent that the current value of an
investor’s account is above the highest net of-fees value previously recorded
(at the end of a payment period).

Waterfall Structure

A partnership’s waterfall refers to the way in which payments are allocated to

the GP and the LPs as profits and losses are realized on deals.

With a deal-by-deal waterfall (or American waterfall), profits are distributed as

each fund investment is sold and shared according to the partnership
agreement. This favors the GP because incentive fees are paid before 100% of
the limited partners’ original investment plus the hurdle rate is returned to
them.

With a whole-of-fund waterfall (or European waterfall), the LPs receive all
distributions until they have received 100% of their initial investment plus the
hurdle rate (typically after all fund investments have been sold).
Claw Back Provision

A clawback provision stipulates that if the GP accrues or receives incentive

payments on gains that are subsequently reversed as the partnership exits
deals, the LPs can recover previous (excess) incentive payments. With a deal-
by-deal waterfall, it may be the case that successful deals are exited initially
and losses are realized later.

A clawback provision would allow the LPs to recover these incentive fees to
the extent that the subsequent losses negate prior gains on which incentive
fees had been paid.
portion of the total profits. A high hurdle rate will result in distributions occur-
ring only after the fund achieves a specified return. A high hurdle rate decreases
the likelihood of, but does not prevent, excess distributions. Management fees,
not incentive fees, are based on committed capital.
Question 3
Until the committed capital is fully drawn down and invested, the management
fee for a private equity fund is based on: (2022 Q33)
A invested capital.
B committed capital.
C assets under management.

Solution:
B is correct. Until the committed capital is fully drawn down and invested, the
management fee for a private equity fund is based on committed capital, not
invested capital.
Question 4
The distribution method by which profits generated by a fund are allocated
between LPs and the GP is called:
A a waterfall.
B an 80/20 split.
C a fair division.

Solution:
A is correct. Although profits are typically split 80/20 between LPs and the GP,
the distribution method of profits is not called an “80/20 split.” “Fair division”
is not a real term that exists in the industry.
Question 5
Fill in the blanks with the correct words: An American waterfall distributes
performance fees on a(n) ___________ basis and is more advantageous to the
___________.
A deal-­by-­deal; LPs
B aggregate fund; LPs
C deal-­by-­deal; GP

Solution:
C is correct. American waterfalls, also known as deal-­by-­deal waterfalls, pay
performance fees after every deal is completed and are more advantageous to
the GP because they get paid sooner (compared with European, or whole-­of-­
fund, waterfalls).
LOS 47.d: Explain investment characteristics of hedge funds.

Use leverage.
Take both long and short positions.
Use derivatives for speculation or hedging portfolio risk.

A lockup period is the time after initial investment over which limited partners
either cannot request redemptions or incur significant fees for redemptions (a
soft lockup).

A notice period (typically between 30 and 90 days) is the amount of time a

fund has to fulfill a redemption request made after the lockup period has
passed.

A fund-of-funds

Hedge Fund Strategies

survivorship bias may bias index returns upward.
Backfill bias
320 Reading 47 ■ Introduction to Alternative Investments

Question 2
An investor may prefer a single hedge fund to a fund of funds if she seeks:
(2022 Q8)
A due diligence expertise.
B better redemption terms.
C a less complex fee structure.

Solution:
C is correct. Hedge funds of funds have multi-­layered fee structures, whereas the
fee structure for a single hedge fund is less complex. Funds of funds presumably
have some expertise in conducting due diligence on hedge funds and may be
able to negotiate more favorable redemption terms than an individual investor
in a single hedge fund could.
Question 3
Hedge funds are similar to private equity funds in that both:
A are typically structured as partnerships.
B assess management fees based on assets under management.
C do not earn an incentive fee until the initial investment is repaid.

Solution:
A is correct. Private equity funds and hedge funds are typically structured as
partnerships where investors are limited partners and the fund is the general
partner. The management fee for private equity funds is based on committed
capital, whereas for hedge funds, the management fees are based on assets
under management. For most private equity funds, the general partner does
not earn an incentive fee until the limited partners have received their initial
investment back.
Question 4
Both event-­driven and macro hedge fund strategies use:
A long–short positions.
B a top-­down approach.
C long-­term market cycles.

Solution:
A is correct. Long–short positions are used by both types of hedge funds to
potentially profit from anticipated market or security moves. Event-­driven
strategies use a bottom-­up approach and seek to profit from a catalyst event
typically involving a corporate action, such as an acquisition or a restructuring.
Macro strategies seek to profit from expected movements in evolving economic
variables.
Question 5
Hedge fund losses are most likely to be magnified by a:
A margin call.
B lockup period.
C redemption notice period.
Solution:
A is correct. Margin calls can magnify losses. To meet the margin call, the
hedge fund manager may be forced to liquidate a losing position in a security,
which, depending on the position size, could exert further price pressure on the
security, resulting in further losses. Restrictions on redemptions, such as lockup
and notice periods, may allow the manager to close positions in a more orderly
manner and minimize forced-­sale liquidations of losing positions.
Question 6
An equity hedge fund following a fundamental growth strategy uses fundamental
analysis to identify companies that are most likely to: (2022 Q16)
A be undervalued.
B be either undervalued or overvalued.
C experience high growth and capital appreciation.

Solution:
C is correct. Fundamental growth strategies take long positions in companies
identified, using fundamental analysis, to have high growth and capital appreci-
ation. Fundamental value strategies use fundamental analysis to identify under-
valued companies. Market-­neutral strategies use quantitative and fundamental
analysis to identify under- and overvalued companies.
LOS 47.e: Explain investment characteristics of private capital.
Power Law
Zero
to One
 Private debt

Direct lending Venture debt. Mezzanine loans

Distressed debt.
PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR LOS E

Question 1
A collateralized loan obligation specialist is most likely to:
A sell its debt at a single interest rate.
B cater to niche borrowers in specific situations.
C rely on diverse risk profiles to complete deals.

Solution:
C is correct. A CLO manager will extend several loans to corporations (usually
to firms involved in LBOs, corporate acquisitions, or other similar types of
transactions), pool these loans, and then divide that pool into various tranches
of debt and equity that range in seniority and security. The CLO manager will
then sell each tranche to different investors according to their risk profiles;
the most senior portion of the CLO will be the least risky, and the most junior
portion of the CLO (i.e., equity) will be the riskiest.
Private Capital 333

A is incorrect because with the different CLO tranches having distinct

risks varying with their seniority and security, they will be priced over a range
of interest rates. In contrast, unitranche debt combines different tranches of
secured and unsecured debt into a single loan with a single, blended interest rate.
B is incorrect because debt extended to niche borrowers in specific situations
is more commonly offered through specialty loans. For example, in litigation
finance, a specialist funding company provides debt to a client to finance the
borrower’s legal fees and expenses in exchange for a portion of any case winnings.
Question 2
Private capital is:
A accurately described by the generic term “private equity.”
B a source of diversification benefits from both debt and equity.
C predisposed to invest in both the debt and equity of a client’s firm.

Solution:
B is correct. Investments in private capital funds can add diversity to a portfolio
composed of publicly traded stocks and bonds because they have less-­than-­
perfect correlation with those investments. There is also the potential to offer
further diversification within the private capital asset class. For example, private
equity investments may also offer vintage diversification since capital is not
deployed at a single point in time but is invested over several years. Private debt
provides investors with the opportunity to diversify the fixed-­income portion of
their portfolios since private debt investments offer more options than bonds
and other public forms of traditional fixed income.
A is incorrect because although private equity is considered by many to
be the largest component of private capital, using “private equity” as a generic
term could be less accurate and possibly misleading since other private forms
of alternative finance have grown considerably in size and popularity.
C is incorrect because although many private investment firms often have
private equity and private debt arms, these teams typically won’t invest in the
same assets or businesses to avoid overexposure to a single investment.
Question 3
The first stage of financing at which a venture capital fund most likely invests
is the: (2020 Q13)
A seed stage.
B mezzanine stage.
C angel investing stage.

Solution:
A is correct. The seed stage supports market research and product development
and is generally the first stage at which venture capital funds invest. The seed
stage follows the angel investing stage. In the angel investing stage, funds are
typically provided by individuals (often friends or family), rather than a venture
capital fund, to assess an idea’s potential and to transform the idea into a plan.
Mezzanine-­stage financing is provided by venture capital funds to prepare the
portfolio company for its IPO.
Question 4
A private equity fund desiring to realize an immediate and complete cash exit
from a portfolio company is most likely to pursue: (2020 Q18)
A an IPO.
B a trade sale.
C a recapitalization.

Solution:
B is correct. Private equity funds can realize an immediate cash exit in a trade sale.
Using this strategy, the portfolio company is typically sold to a strategic buyer.
Question 5
Angel investing capital is typically provided in which stage of financing? (2020
Q24)
A Later stage
B Formative stage
C Mezzanine stage

Solution:
B is correct. Formative-­stage financing occurs when the company is still in the
process of being formed and encompasses several financing steps. Angel investing
capital is typically raised in this early stage of financing.
Question 6
Private equity funds are most likely to use:
A merger arbitrage strategies.
B leveraged buyouts.
C market-­neutral strategies.

Solution:
B is correct. The majority of private equity activity involves leveraged buyouts.
Merger arbitrage and market neutral are strategies used by hedge funds.
LOS 47.f: Explain investment characteristics of natural resources.

Instruments to gain exposure to commodity prices are- Derivatives

Other methods of exposure to commodities include the following:

1. Managed futures funds- commodity trading advisers (CTAs)

Managed futures funds can be structured as limited partnerships with fees like
those of hedge funds (e.g., 2 and 20) and restrictions on the number, net worth,
and liquidity of the investors.

They can also be structured like mutual funds with shares that are publicly
traded so that retail investors can also beneϐit from professional management

2. commodity ETFs

3.Specialized funds in specific commodity sectors can be organized under any

of the structures we have discussed and focus on certain commodities, such as
oil and gas, grains, precious metals, or industrial metals.

- Returns on commodities over time have been lower than returns on

global stocks or bonds
- Because commodity prices tend to move with inflation rates, holding
commodities can act as a hedge of inflation risk.
- Spot prices for commodities are a function of supply and demand.
- For many commodities, supply is inelastic in the short run because of
long lead times to alter production levels
- futures price ≈ spot price × (1 + risk-free rate) + storage costs –
convenience yield
- Contango & Backwardation
Farmland and Timberland

Timberland returns also include price changes on timberland, which depend

on expectations of lumber prices and how much timber has been harvested.

Risks of investing in farmland and timberland include low liquidity, high

ϐixed costs of production, variable cash ϐlows that depend on weather, and
potential losses from natural disasters such as wildϐires.
PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR LOS F

Question 1
A significant challenge to investing in timber is most likely its:
A high correlation with other asset classes.
B dependence on an international competitive context.
C return volatility compounded by financial market exposure.
Natural Resources 349

Solution:
B is correct. A primary risk of timber is the international competitive landscape.
Timber is a globally sold and consumed commodity subject to world trade
interruptions. So the international context can be considered one of its major
risk factors.
A is incorrect because timberland offers an income stream based on the sale
of trees, wood, and other timber products that has not been highly correlated
with other asset classes.
C is incorrect because investors are interested in timber because of its global
nature (everyone requires shelter), the current income generated from the sale
of the crop, inflation protection from holding the land, and its safe haven char-
acteristics (it offers some insulation from financial market volatility).
Question 2
A characteristic of farmland strongly distinguishing it from timberland is its:
A commodity price-­driven returns.
B inherent rigidity of production for output.
C value as an offset to other human activities.

Solution:
B is correct. Unlike timberland products, farm products must be harvested
when ripe, so there is little flexibility in the production process. In contrast,
timber (trees) can be grown and easily “stored” by simply not harvesting. This
feature offers the flexibility of harvesting more trees when timber prices are up
and delaying harvests when prices are down.
A is incorrect because just as a primary return driver for timberland is
change in commodity price (of lumber from cut wood) in either the spot or
futures price, farmland’s returns are driven by agricultural commodity prices,
with commodity futures contracts potentially combined with farmland holdings
to generate an overall hedged return.
C is incorrect because for both farmland and timberland owned or leased for
the benefit of the bounty each generates in the form of crops and more broadly
timber, since these resources consume carbon as part of the plant life cycle, the
considered value comes not just from the harvest but also from the offset to
other human activities.
Question 3
Which of the following statements about commodity investing is invalid?
A Few commodity investors trade actual physical commodities.
B Commodity producers and consumers both hedge and speculate.
C Commodity indexes are based on the price of physical commodities.

Solution:
C is correct. Commodity indexes typically use the price of futures contracts
on the commodities included in them rather than the prices of the physical
commodities themselves in order to be transparent, investable, and replicable.
A is incorrect because trading in physical commodities is primarily limited
to a smaller group of entities that are part of the physical supply chain. Thus,
most commodity investors do not trade actual physical commodities but, rather,
trade commodity derivatives.
 B is incorrect because although supply chain participants use futures to
hedge their forward purchases and sales of the physical commodities, those
commodity producers and consumers nonetheless both hedge and speculate
on commodity prices.
Question 4
An investor seeks a current income stream as a component of total return and
desires an investment that historically has low correlation with other asset
classes. The investment most likely to achieve the investor’s goals is: (2020 Q10)
A timberland.
B collectibles.
C commodities.

Solution:
4. A is correct. Timberland offers an income stream based on the sale of timber
products as a component of total return and has historically generated returns
not highly correlated with other asset classes.
Question 5 Upward
If a commodity’s forward curve is downward sloping and there is little or no
convenience yield, the market is said to be in:
A backwardation.
B contango.
C equilibrium.

Solution:
5. B is correct. Contango is a condition in the futures markets in which the spot
price is lower than the futures price, the forward curve is upward sloping, and
there is little or no convenience yield. Backwardation is the opposite condition in
the futures markets, where the spot price exceeds the futures price, the forward
curve is downward sloping, and the convenience yield is high. Equilibrium is an
economic term where supply is equal to demand.
LOS 47.g: Explain investment characteristics of real estate.
Financial Models - Valuations
PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR LOS G

Question 1
The majority of real estate property may be classified as either:
A debt or equity.
B commercial or residential.
C direct ownership or indirect ownership.

Solution:
B is correct. The majority of real estate property may be classified as either
commercial or residential.
Question 2
Which of the following relates to a benefit when owning real estate directly?
A Taxes
B Capital requirements
C Portfolio concentration

Solution:
A is correct. When owning real estate directly, there is a benefit related to taxes.
The owner can use property non-­cash depreciation expenses to reduce taxable
income and lower the current income tax bill. In fact, accelerated depreciation
and interest expense can reduce taxable income below zero in the early years of
asset ownership, and losses can be carried forward to offset future income. Thus, a
Real Estate 365

property investment can be cash-­flow positive while generating accounting losses

and deferring tax payments. If the tax losses do not reverse during the life of the
asset, depreciation-­recapture taxes can be triggered when the property is sold.
B is incorrect because the large capital requirement is a major disadvantage
of investing directly in real estate.
C is incorrect because a disadvantage for smaller investors who own real
estate directly is that they bear the risk of portfolio concentration.
Question 3
Which of the following statements is true regarding mortgage-­backed securities?
A Insurance companies prefer the first-­loss tranche.
B When interest rates rise, prepayments will likely accelerate.
C When interest rates fall, the low-­risk senior tranche will amortize more
quickly.

Solution:
C is correct. When interest rates decline, borrowers are likely to refinance their
loans at a faster pace than before, resulting in faster amortization of each MBS
tranche, including the senior tranche, which is the lowest-­risk tranche.
A is incorrect because risk-­averse investors, primarily insurance companies,
prefer the lowest-­risk tranches, which are the first to receive interest and prin-
cipal. The junior-­most tranche is referred to as the first-­loss tranche. It is the
highest-­risk tranche and is the last to receive interest and principal distributions.
B is incorrect because when interest rates rise, prepayments will likely slow
down, lengthening the duration of most MBS tranches. Prepayments will likely
increase when interest rates decline, because borrowers are likely to refinance
their loans at a faster pace.
Question 4
Which of the following statements is true for REITs?
A According to GAAP, equity REITs are exempt from reporting earnings per
share.
B Though equity REIT correlations with other asset classes are typically
moderate, they are highest during steep market downturns.
C The REIT corporation pays taxes on income, and the REIT shareholder
pays taxes on the REIT’s dividend distribution of after-­tax earnings.

Solution:
B is correct. Real estate investments, including REITs, provide important portfolio
benefits due to moderate correlation with other asset classes. However, there
are periods when equity REIT correlations with other securities are high, and
their correlations are highest during steep market downturns.
A is incorrect because equity REITs, like other public companies, must report
earnings per share based on net income as defined by GAAP or IFRS.
C is incorrect because REITs can avoid this double taxation. A REIT can
avoid corporate income taxation by distributing dividends equal to 90%–100%
of its taxable net rental income. This ability to avoid double taxation is the main
appeal of the REIT structure.
Question 5
What is the most significant drawback of a repeat sales index to measure returns
to real estate? (2020 Q14)
A Sample selection bias
B Understatement of volatility
C Reliance on subjective appraisals

Solution:
A is correct. A repeat sales index uses the changes in price of repeat sales prop-
erties to construct the index. Sample selection bias is a significant drawback
because the properties that sell in each period vary and may not be representative
of the overall market the index is meant to cover. The properties that transact
are not a random sample and may be biased toward properties that changed in
value. Understated volatility and reliance on subjective appraisals by experts are
drawbacks of an appraisal index.
Question 6
As the loan-­to-­value ratio increases for a real estate investment, risk most likely
increases for: (2020 Q19)
A debt investors only.
B equity investors only.
C both debt and equity investors.

Solution:
C is correct. The higher the loan-­to-­value ratio, the higher leverage is for a real
estate investment, which increases the risk to both debt and equity investors.
LOS 47.h: Explain investment characteristics of infrastructure.
374 Reading 47 ■ Introduction to Alternative Investments

KNOWLEDGE CHECK
To highlight typical risk management approaches on infrastructure projects,
draw connecting lines to match a particular risk type with its appropriate mit-
igating mechanism:
Infrastructure Risk Type Offsetting Mechanism
Construction Incentivized maintenance contract
Operational Insurance against debt default
Demand/volume PPP agreement
Currency Take-­or-­pay arrangement
Political Fixed-­price date-­certain contract

Solution:
The correct matches are as follows:

Infrastructure Risk Type Offsetting Mechanism

Construction Incentivized maintenance contract
Operational Insurance against debt default
Demand/volume PPP agreement
Currency Take-or-pay arrangement
Political Fixed-price date-certain contract

PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR LOS H

Question 1
Compared with direct investment in infrastructure, publicly traded infrastructure
securities are characterized by:
A higher concentration risk.
B more transparent governance.
C greater control over the infrastructure assets.

Solution
B is correct. Publicly traded infrastructure securities, which include shares of
companies, exchange-­traded funds, and listed funds that invest in infrastructure,
provide the benefits of transparent governance, liquidity, reasonable fees, market
prices, and the ability to diversify among underlying assets. Direct investment in
infrastructure involves a large capital investment in any single project, resulting
in high concentration risks. Direct investment in infrastructure provides control
over the assets and the opportunity to capture the assets’ full value.
Question 2
Which of the following forms of infrastructure investment is the most liquid?
A An unlisted infrastructure mutual fund
B A direct investment in a greenfield project
C An exchange-­traded MLP
Solution:
C is correct. A publicly traded infrastructure security, such as an exchange-­traded
MLP, provides the benefit of liquidity.
Question 3
An investor chooses to invest in a brownfield, rather than a greenfield, infra-
structure project. The investor is most likely motivated by:
A growth opportunities.
B predictable cash flows.
C higher expected returns.

Solution:
B is correct. A brownfield investment is an investment in an existing infrastruc-
ture asset, which is more likely to have a history of steady cash flows compared
with that of a greenfield investment. Growth opportunities and returns are
expected to be lower for brownfield investments, which are less risky than
greenfield investments.
Question 4
The privatization of an existing hospital is best described as:
A a greenfield investment.
B a brownfield investment.
C an economic infrastructure investment.

Solution:
B is correct. Investing in an existing infrastructure asset with the intent to
privatize, lease, or sell and lease back the asset is referred to as a brownfield
investment. An economic infrastructure asset supports economic activity and
includes such assets as transportation and utility assets. Hospitals are social
infrastructure assets, which are focused on human activities.
Question 5
Risks in infrastructure investing are most likely greatest when the project involves:
A construction of infrastructure assets.
B investment in existing infrastructure assets.
C investing in assets that will be leased back to a government.

Solution:
A is correct. Infrastructure projects involving construction have more risk than
investments in existing assets with a demonstrated cash flow or investments in
assets that are expected to generate regular cash flows.
LOS 47.i: Describe issues in performance appraisal of alternative
investments.

One commonly reported risk-adjusted return measure for alternative

investments is the Sharpe ratio, which is calculated as excess return per
unit of risk:

The biggest issue with using this statistic is that standard deviation may
not be the appropriate measure of risk. Returns on alternative
investments might not be normally distributed.
When return skewness is significantly different from zero or return
kurtosis is significantly different from three, standard deviation is not the
most appropriate measure of risk, so Sharpe ratios are not the most
appropriate measure of risk-adjusted returns.
Some analysts prefer the Sortino ratio to the Sharpe ratio as a risk-adjusted
return measure. The Sortino ratio substitutes downside deviation, which is
based on only deviations below the mean (expected) return, for standard
deviation in the Sharpe ratio.

One limitation of both the Sharpe and Sortino ratios is that they do not take
into account the diversification beneϐits from low correlations with returns to
traditional investments.
The Treynor ratio uses beta (a measure of systematic risk that is based on
return correlations) as the denominator.

The Calmar ratio is computationally less complex. It is calculated as the

average annual compound return divided by the maximum drawdown
(decrease in value from peak to trough). Larger values are preferred, as again
we are measuring returns relative to risk.

PE - One simple measure of investment success is the multiple of invested

capital (or money multiple)—the ratio of total capital returned plus the value
of any remaining assets, to the total capital paid in over the life of the
investment.
Issues in Performance Appraisal 385

It is important to note that although the ratios we have considered are among the
best performance and risk tools available, they can still lead to inappropriate conclu-
sions, as shown in the following example.

EXAMPLE 3 
Steamboat Structured Products LLC is a manager that specializes in the pur-
chase and sale of residential mortgage-­backed securities, sometimes hedged
with other put option and short equity index exposures. For the most part, its
strategy is geared to earn an attractive monthly mortgage payment on as low
of a loan-­to-­value ratio of a secured property as possible. Steamboat managers
are generally very good at sourcing such investments.
However, Steamboat’s managers discover that in the wake of the 2008
financial crisis, many small pieces of “odd-­lot” RMBS paper are being sold by
financial institutions across the United States, sometimes with face values of just
$200,000–$400,000. This paper is often offered at a 10% or 15% discount to the
price a more sizable and significant “round-­lot” block of $1 million–$2 million
of the same type of paper might trade.
Steamboat managers know that their outside administrator will place only
a single round-­lot valuation on each security identifier (often referred to as a
CUSIP) in their portfolio, and thus they can’t resist starting to buy as many of
these odd-­lot offerings as possible. When they do, their administrator does indeed
immediately mark them higher, which, as Steamboat continues this practice
month after month, creates a lovely track record of constant “trading profits” on
top of their natural coupon income. To the greatest extent possible, Steamboat
hopes to create odd-­lot “matchers” to eventually aggregate its exposures into
larger tradable blocks. But what happens instead is that the firm ends up with
2,000 small-­position line items in its book and a glorious track record.
This is a story of an illiquid asset class that is naturally hard to trade and
mark. Steamboat’s Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, and Calmar ratio all look stron-
ger than they really should be, mostly because of accounting conventions. If
Steamboat were ever forced to sell its portfolio, the odd-­lot discount earned as
trading revenue would largely disappear and be replaced by the true liquidation
values that Steamboat would find in the market from others for its accumulated
odd-­lot portfolio.
Performance ratio analysis must, therefore, be discounted when dealing
with illiquid securities as described here. Although not necessarily fraudulent,
standard accounting practices can be purposefully gamed.

PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR LOS I

Question 1
The Sharpe ratio is a less-­than-­ideal performance measure for alternative
investments because:
A it uses a semi-­deviation measure of volatility.
B returns of alternative assets are not normally distributed.
C alternative assets exhibit low correlation with traditional asset classes.
386 Reading 47 ■ Introduction to Alternative Investments

Solution:
B is correct. The Sharpe ratio assumes normally distributed returns. However,
alternative assets tend to have non-­normal return distributions with significant
skewness (fat tails in one direction or the other) and kurtosis (sharper peak than a
normal distribution has, with fatter tails). Therefore, the Sharpe ratio may not be
a good risk-­adjusted performance measure to rely on for alternative investments.
A is incorrect because the Sharpe ratio does not use a semi-­deviation measure
of volatility; it uses standard deviation. The Sortino ratio uses a semi-­deviation
measure of volatility. Further, the use of semi-­deviation instead of standard devi-
ation actually makes the Sortino ratio a more attractive measure of alternative
asset performance than the Sharpe ratio.
C is incorrect because correlation does not enter into the calculation of the
Sharpe ratio. However, it is true that alternative assets can have low correla-
tions with other asset classes. In contrast to the Sharpe ratio, the Treynor ratio
incorporates the beta of the alternative asset relative to a benchmark, which is
conceptually similar to correlation.
Question 2
Which of the following is true regarding private equity performance calculations?
A The money multiple calculation relies on the amount and timing of cash
flows.
B The IRR calculation involves the assumption of two rates.
C Because private equity funds have low volatility, accounting conventions
allow them to use a lagged mark-­to-­market process.

Solution:
B is correct. The determination of an IRR involves certain assumptions about a
financing rate to use for outgoing cash flows (typically a weighted average cost
of capital) and a reinvestment rate assumption to make on incoming cash flows
(which must be assumed and may or may not actually be earned).
A is incorrect because the money multiple calculation completely ignores
the timing of cash flows.
C is incorrect because it is somewhat of a reversal of cause and effect: Private
equity (PE) funds can appear to have low volatility because of the lag in their
mark-­to-­market process. It’s not that PE investments don’t actually rise and fall
behind the scenes with economic influences, but accounting conventions may
simply leave longer-­lived investments marked at their initial cost for some time
or with only modest adjustments to such carrying value until known impairments
or realization events begin to transpire. Also, because PE funds are not easily
marked to market, their returns can appear somewhat smoothed, making them
appear more resilient and less correlated with other assets than they really are.
The slowness to re-­mark them can unfortunately be confused by investors as
an overall lack of volatility.
Question 3
Which is not true of mark-­to-­model valuations?
A Return volatility may be understated.
B Returns may be smooth and overstated.
C A calibrated model will produce a reliable liquidation value.
Solution:
C is correct. It is not true that a calibrated model will produce a reliable liquidation
value in a mark-­to-­model valuation. The need to use a model for valuation arises
when an asset is so illiquid that there are not reliable market values available. A
model may reflect only an imperfect theoretical valuation, not a true liquidation
value, should liquidation become necessary. The illiquid nature of alternative
assets means that estimates, rather than observable transaction prices, may have
been used for valuation purposes.
A and B are not correct because they are both true statements.
Question 4
An analyst wanting to assess the downside risk of an alternative investment is
least likely to use the investment’s: (2020 Q34)
A Sortino ratio.
B value at risk (VaR).
C standard deviation of returns.

Solution:
C is correct. Downside risk measures focus on the left side of the return distri-
bution curve, where losses occur. The standard deviation of returns assumes that
returns are normally distributed. Many alternative investments do not exhibit
close-­to-­normal distributions of returns, which is a crucial assumption for the
validity of a standard deviation as a comprehensive risk measure. Assuming
normal probability distributions when calculating these measures will lead to
an underestimation of downside risk for a negatively skewed distribution. Both
the Sortino ratio and the VaR measure are measures of downside risk.
LOS 47.j: Calculate and interpret returns of alternative investments on both
before-fee and after-fee bases.

Although “2 and 20” and “1 and 10” were at one time fairly standard fee
structures for fund and fund-of-funds investments, these fee structures have
been under competitive pressure and should be considered negotiable

Investors can negotiate for lower fees or better liquidity (shorter lockups and
notice periods). Hurdle rates, hard versus soft hurdles, and catch-up
provisions may also be subject to negotiation.

Annual investor fees can also be either-or fees, the maximum of the
management fee or the incentive fee. Under such a structure, with a 1%
management fee and a 30% incentive fee, investor fees each year would be
simply the management fee unless the calculated incentive fee is greater.

Early investors in a fund may also receive lower fees or better liquidity terms
as an incentive to invest at the inception of a fund. The investment interests of
early investors that receive such relatively better terms are called founder’s
shares.
EXAMPLE 4 

Incentive Fees Relative to Waterfall Types

A PE fund invests $15  million in a nascent luxury yacht manufacturer and
$17 million in a new casino venture. The yacht manufacturer generates a $9 mil-
lion profit when the company is acquired by a larger competitor, but the casino
venture turns out to be a flop when its state licensing is eventually denied and
it generates a $10 million loss. If the manager’s carried interest incentive fee is
20% of the profits, what would this incentive be with a European-­style waterfall
whole-­of-­fund approach, and what would it be if the incentive is paid on an
American-­style waterfall deal-­by-­deal basis (assuming no clawback applies)?
Solution:
In aggregate, the fund lost money (+$9 million − $10 million = –$1 million), so
with a European-­style whole-­of-­fund waterfall and assuming the time period for
the gain and the loss are the same, there is no incentive fee. With an American-­
style waterfall, the GP could still earn 20% × $9 million = $1.8 million on the
yacht company, thereby further compounding the loss to the ultimate investor
to –$2.8 million net of fees.

Aggregate Yacht Company Casino Venture

Investment $32 m $15 m $17 m

Profit/Loss -$1 m $9 m -$10 m
Incentive by Deal 20% × $9m = $1.8m $0 m
Total Incentive $0 m $1.8 m

If the gain and loss in this example transpired sequentially over different
years, perhaps with the yacht company gain occurring first and then the Casino
venture loss later on, the outcome for a European-­style waterfall would typi-
cally result in an initial accrued incentive fee for the yacht manufacturer gain,
but if there is a clawback provision in place, then there would be a clawback of
that fee for the investor in the subsequent year when the casino venture loss is
eventually realized, still resulting in no overall incentive fee. Waterfall language
and clawback provisions on fees are very important to study and understand in
offering memorandums, and these terms can vary widely.
EXAMPLE 5 

Fee and Return Calculations

AWJ Capital is a hedge fund with $100 million of initial investment capital. It
charges a 2% management fee based on year-­end AUM and a 20% incentive fee.
In its first year, AWJ Capital has a 30% return. Assume management fees are
calculated using end-­of-­period valuation.
1 What are the fees earned by AWJ if the incentive and management fees
are calculated independently? What is an investor’s effective return given
this fee structure?
2 What are the fees earned by AWJ assuming that the incentive fee is cal-
culated from the return net of the management fee? What is an investor’s
net return given this fee structure?
3 If the fee structure specifies a hurdle rate of 5% and the incentive fee is
based on returns in excess of the hurdle rate, what are the fees earned by
AWJ assuming the performance fee is calculated net of the management
fee? What is an investor’s net return given this fee structure?
4 In the second year, the fund value declines to $110 million. The fee struc-
ture is as specified for Question 1 but also includes the use of a high-­
water mark (computed net of fees). What are the fees earned by AWJ in
the second year? What is an investor’s net return for the second year given
this fee structure?
5 In the third year, the fund value increases to $128 million. The fee struc-
ture is as specified in Questions 1 and 4. What are the fees earned by AWJ
in the third year? What is an investor’s net return for the third year given
this fee structure?
Solution to 1:
AWJ fees
$130 million × 2% = $2.6 million management fee.
($130 − $100) million × 20% = $6 million incentive fee.
Total fees to AWJ Capital = $8.6 million.
Investor return: ($130 − $100 − $8.6) million/$100 million = 21.40%.

Solution to 2:
$130 million × 2% = $2.6 million management fee.
($130 − $100 − $2.6) million × 20% = $5.48 million incentive fee.
Total fees to AWJ Capital = $8.08 million.
Investor return: ($130 − $100 − $8.08) million/$100 million = 21.92%.

Solution to 3:
$130 million × 2% = $2.6 million management fee.
($130 − $100 − $5 − $2.6) million × 20% = $4.48 million incentive fee.
Total fees to AWJ Capital = $7.08 million.
Investor return: ($130 − $100 − $7.08) million/$100 million = 22.92%.

Solution to 4:
$110 million × 2% = $2.2 million management fee.
No incentive fee because the fund has declined in value.
Total fees to AWJ Capital = $2.2 million.
Investor return: ($110 − $2.2 − $121.4) million/$121.4 million = –11.20%.
The beginning capital position in the second year for the investors is ($130 − $8.6)
million = $121.4 million. The ending capital position at the end of the second
year is ($110 − $2.2) million = $107.8 million.
Solution to 5:
$128 million × 2% = $2.56 million management fee.
($128 − $121.4) million × 20% = $1.32 million incentive fee.
The $121.4  million represents the high-­water mark established at the end of
Year 1.
Total fees to AWJ Capital = $3.88 million.
Investor return: ($128 − $3.88 − $107.8) million/$107.8 million = 15.14%.
The ending capital position at the end of Year 3 is $124.12  million. This
amount is the new high-­water mark.
KNOWLEDGE CHECK
Fill in the blank: Fund offering documents typically offer terms that include a
___________, whereby incentive fees will accrue, and subsequently be paid, only
on new earnings above and beyond the recoupment of any prior losses.
Solution:
Fund offering documents typically offer terms that include a high-­water mark,
whereby incentive fees will accrue, and subsequently be paid, only on new earn-
ings above and beyond the recoupment of any prior losses.

KNOWLEDGE CHECK
True or false: Advantages of funds-­of-­hedge funds include: due diligence in
selecting individual hedge funds, access to hedge funds that may be closed to
direct investments, and dilution of returns to the investor.
A True, statement to support this option on why it’s true.
B False, statement to support this option on why it’s false.

Solution:
B is correct; the statement is false. Although these three attributes are indeed
true of funds of hedge funds, the dilution of returns to the investor is a dis-
advantage for the investor, not an advantage. The “due diligence” and “access”
attributes are advantages.

EXAMPLE 6 

Comparison of Returns: Investment Directly into a Hedge

Fund or through a Fund of Hedge Funds
An investor is contemplating investing €100 million in either the ABC Hedge
Fund (ABC HF) or the XYZ Fund of Funds (XYZ FOF). XYZ FOF has a “1 and
10” fee structure and invests 10% of its AUM in ABC HF. ABC HF has a standard
“2 and 20” fee structure with no hurdle rate. Management fees are calculated
on an annual basis on AUM at the beginning of the year. For simplicity, assume
that management fees and incentive fees are calculated independently. ABC HF
has a 20% return for the year before management and incentive fees.
1 Calculate the return to the investor from investing directly in ABC HF.
2 Calculate the return to the investor from investing in XYZ FOF. Assume
that the other investments in the XYZ FOF portfolio generate the same
return before management fees as those of ABC HF and that XYZ FOF
has the same fee structure as ABC HF.
3 Why would the investor choose to invest in a fund of funds instead of
a hedge fund given the effect of the “double fee” demonstrated in the
answers to Questions 1 and 2?

Solution to 1:
ABC HF has a profit before fees on a €100 million investment of €20 million
(= €100 million × 20%). The management fee is €2 million (= €100 million ×
2%), and the incentive fee is €4 million (= €20 million × 20%). The return to the
investor is 14% [= (20 − 2 − 4)/100].
Solution to 2:
XYZ FOF earns a 14% return or €14 million profit after fees on €100 million
invested with hedge funds. XYZ FOF charges the investor a management fee
of €1  million (= €100  million × 1%) and an incentive fee of €1.4  million (=
€14 million × 10%). The return to the investor is 11.6% [= (14 − 1 − 1.4)/100].
Solution to 3:
This scenario assumes that returns are the same for all underlying hedge funds.
In practice, this result will not likely be the case, and XYZ FOF may provide due
diligence expertise and potentially valuable diversification.
EXAMPLE 7 

1  Clawbacks Due to Return Timing Differences

The Granite Rock Fund makes investments in leveraged-­buyout Company A and
start-­up Company B, each for $10 million. One year later, the leveraged-­buyout
company returns a $14 million profit, and two years later, the start-­up company
turns into a complete bust, deemed to be worth zero.
If the GP’s carried interest incentive fee is 20% of aggregate profits and there
is a clawback provision, how much carried interest will the GP initially accrue
and ultimately receive?
Solution:
From leveraged-­buyout Company A, the GP would initially accrue a 20% of
$14 million profit at the end of the first year, equal to $2.8 million. Typically, this
amount would be held in escrow for the benefit of the GP but not actually paid.
But then the GP loses $10 million of the initial $14 million gain, so the aggre-
gate whole-­of-­fund gain at the end of the second year would be only $4 million;
this amount times 20% would result in only an $800,000 incentive fee. The general
partner would then have to return $2 million of the previously accrued incentive
fees to the capital accounts of LP investors because of the clawback provision.
2  Soft and Hard Hurdles
A real estate investment fund has a $100 million initial drawdown structure in
its first year and fully draws this capital to purchase a property. The fund has
a soft hurdle preferred return to investors of 8% per annum and an 80%/20%
carried interest incentive split thereafter. At the end of year two, the property
is sold for a total of $160 million.
What are the correct distributions to the LPs and to the GP? And how would
these have been different if the real estate investment fund had a hard hurdle of
8% per annum instead of a soft hurdle?
Solution:
One needs to construct a waterfall of cash flows.
First, the LPs would be due their $100 million initial investment.
Then, they would be due $16 million (8% preferred return on initial capital
for two years).
The soft hurdle has been met, and the GP is ultimately due 20% of $60 mil-
lion, or $12 million, which would be paid to the GP next as a catch-­up to the
achieved hurdle return.
The residual amount would be $160 million − $100 million − $16 million −
$12 million = $32 million. This amount would then be split 80% to the LPs and
20% to the GP, or $25.6 million and $6.4 million, respectively.
So, the total payout with a soft annual hurdle of 8% of the $160 million would
end up with the following waterfall:
394 Reading 47 ■ Introduction to Alternative Investments

LP GP

Return of Capital $100 m

8% Prfd per Annum $16 m
GP Catch-­Up 20% $12 m
80%/20% Split $25.6 m $6.4 m
Total Payout $141.6 m 18.4 m

If the fund instead had a hard hurdle rate, only the amount above the $100
return of capital and $16 million preferred return would be subject to the 20%
carried interest incentive to the GP: 20% × $44 million = $8.8 million, quite a
bit less than the carried interest payment with the soft hurdle. The LPs would
be due the balance of $35.2 million ($44 million − $8.8 million incentive). This
would result in the following total payout:

LP GP

Return of Capital $100 m

8% Prfd per Annum $16 m
80%/20% Split Above Hurdle $35.2 m $8.8 m
Total Payout $151.2 m 8.8 m

PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR LOS J

Question 1
United Capital is a hedge fund with $250 million of initial capital. United charges
a 2% management fee based on assets under management at year end and a 20%
incentive fee based on returns in excess of an 8% hurdle rate. In its first year,
United appreciates 16%. Assume management fees are calculated using end-­
of-­period valuation. The investor’s net return assuming the performance fee is
calculated net of the management fee is closest to: (2020 Q26)
A 11.58%.
B 12.54%.
C 12.80%.

Solution:
B is correct. The net investor return is 12.54%, calculated as follows:
End-­of-­year capital = $250 million × 1.16 = $290 million.
Management fee = $290 million × 2% = $5.8 million.
Hurdle amount = 8% of $250 million = $20 million.
Incentive fee = ($290 − $250 − $20 − $5.8) million × 20% = $2.84 million.
Total fees to United Capital = ($5.8 + $2.84) million = $8.64 million.
Investor net return: ($290 − $250 − $8.64)/$250 = 12.54%.
Calculating Fees and Returns 395

Question 2
Capricorn Fund of Funds invests GBP100 million in each of Alpha Hedge Fund
and ABC Hedge Fund. Capricorn Fund of Funds has a “1 and 10” fee structure.
Management fees and incentive fees are calculated independently at the end of
each year. After one year, net of their respective management and incentive fees,
Capricorn’s investment in Alpha is valued at GBP80  million and Capricorn’s
investment in ABC is valued at GBP140 million. The annual return to an investor
in Capricorn Fund of Funds, net of fees assessed at the fund-­of-­funds level, is
closest to: (2020 Q27)
A 7.9%.
B 8.0%.
C 8.1%.

Solution:
A is correct because the net investor return is 7.9%, calculated as follows:
First, note that “1 and 10” refers to a 1% management fee and a 10% incentive
fee.
End-­of-­year capital = GBP140 million + GBP80 million = GBP220 million.
Management fee = GBP220 million × 1% = GBP2.2 million.
Incentive fee = (GBP220 − GBP200) million × 10% = GBP2 million.
Total fees to Capricorn = (GBP2.2 + GBP2) million = GBP4.2 million.
Investor net return: (GBP220 − GBP200 − GBP4.2)/GBP200 = 7.9%.

Question 3
The following information applies to Rotunda Advisers, a hedge fund:
■■ $288 million in AUM as of prior year end
■■ 2% management fee (based on year-­end AUM)
■■ 20% incentive fee calculated:
●● net of management fee
●● using a 5% soft hurdle rate
●● using a high-­water mark (high-­water mark is $357 million)
■■ Current-­year fund gross return is 25%.
The total fee earned by Rotunda in the current year is closest to: (2020 Q28)
A $7.20 million.
B $20.16 million.
C $21.60 million.

Solution:
A is correct. Although the gross return of Rotunda results in a $360 million gross
NAV, the deduction of the $7.2 million incentive fee brings NAV to $352.8 mil-
lion, which is below the prior high-­water mark. Rotunda earns a management
fee of $7.20  million but does not earn an incentive fee because the year-­end
fund value net of management fee does not exceed the prior high-­water mark of
$357 million. Since Rotunda is still also below the prior-­year high-­water mark,
the hurdle rate of return is also basically irrelevant in this fee calculation.
The specifics of this calculation are as follows:
End-­of-­year AUM = Prior year-­end AUM × (1 + Fund return) = $288 million
× 1.25 = $360 million.
$360 million × 2% = $7.20 million management fee.
$360 million − $7.2 million = $352.8 million AUM net of management fee.
The year-­end AUM net of fees do not exceed the $357 million high-­water
mark. Therefore, no incentive fee is earned.
Question 4
A hedge fund has the following fee structure:
Annual management fee based on year-­end AUM 2%
Incentive fee 20%
Hurdle rate before incentive fee collection starts 4%
Current high-­water mark $610 million

The fund has a value of $583.1 million at the beginning of the year. After
one year, it has a value of $642 million before fees. The net percentage return
to an investor for this year is closest to: (2020 Q29)
A 6.72%.
B 6.80%.
C 7.64%.

Solution:
C is correct. The management fee for the year is
$642 × 0.02 = $12.84 million.
Because the ending gross value of the fund of $642 million exceeds the high-­
water mark of $610 million, the hedge fund can collect an incentive fee on gains
above this high-­water mark but net of the hurdle rate of return. The incentive
fee calculation becomes
{$642 − [$610 × (1 + 0.04)]} × 0.20 = $1.52 million.
The net return to the investor for the year is
[($642 − $12.84 − $1.52)/$583.1] − 1 ≈ 0.07638 ≈ 7.64%.