An examination of guidance and counselling must begin by insisting that
just as every teacher is a teacher of social skills (Chapter 11 ), so every teacher is an educational counsellor. By this I mean that part of each tea- cher's function is to help children deal with personal problems and to make decisions about the course that their lives should take. Since tea- chers are individuals they will inevitably vary in the degree of import- ance they attach to their counselling roles, and they will also vary in the extent to which children seem prepared to consult them about their diffi- culties. Some teachers tend to invite confidences more readily than others, and to be more sympathetic and patient in their relationships with children. Children feel they can talk to them, and can trust their reactions. It is in fact these two qualities, sympathy and trustworthiness, rather than any great familiarity with counselling techniques, that chil- dren appear to look for when deciding to whom they should tum when in need. The second of these qualities, trustworthiness, sometimes seems to be compromised by the fact that teachers have a dual role (Chapter 11 ). Pri- marily they represent the authority of the school, and only secondly do they represent the disinterested confidentiality of the counsellor. Thus, if a child wishes to discuss with the teacher some problem related to school, such as alleged unfair treatment by another member of staff, or theft of school equipment, or cheating in a school examination, he or she may feel unsure whether the teacher will consider it proper to report matters to a higher authority. Similarly, the teacher may feel the tug of divided loyalties and be worried as to where professional duty lies, and this may be one strong reason why some teachers appear to discourage the kind of confidences that would put them in this uncertain position.
One way of avoiding the problem is for the school to employ a
member of staff whose duties extend only to counselling, and who does not carry a teaching or a disciplinary function at all. The reason why this practice is not more widespread is hard to say for sure, though some teachers express themselves to be uneasy at the presence of a specialist counsellor on the staff. They are concerned that they might be the subject of discussion between the counsellor and children, that by their very presence in the school counsellors are a threat to their own pastoral roles, and that if there are secrets which the counsellor is not prepared to divulge even to the headteacher, then the latter's authority must to some extent be undermined within the school. It · seems, therefore, that however much we may be in favour of specialist counsellors, it is prob- able that the counselling role will still largely be left to the ordinary teacher for the foreseeable future. Thus it is important for teachers to have at least a limited knowledge of the major variables involved. Some schools give heads of house or heads of year the responsibility for co- ordinating counselling activities and for advising new members of staff on what to do, while others appoint a head of pastoral care, but few of those involved have attended more than short courses on counselling organized by local authorities or professional bodies, and fewer still have actual formal qualifications in the subject. This again is unfortunate, since one of the best ways of disseminating counselling skills is for someone on the staff with specialist training to become responsible for handing this information on to others. Thus individual teachers can learn these skills within the practical context in which they have to apply them, and can seek a convenient source of expert advice whenever they feel unsure of themselves.
The problem of confidentiality
To go back to the beginning, it has been stressed that trustworthiness
and sympathy are the basic gifts that the good counsellor has to offer to the child. I have also said, however, that a major problem arises when the child brings to the counsellor's attention material that concerns dis- obedience to important school rules, or that threatens important values and standards. Should the counsellor maintain confidentiality, or betray the child's trust and go to the headmaster or to another member of the school hierarchy? Some writers suggest that the teacher should always warn children before they offer confidences that he or she may feel it necessary to break confidence, and this is good policy as far as it goes. The problem is that it may deter the child from seeking help, and encourage silence on matters that, in his or her own interest, should be brought out into the open. There is, too, always the chance that confi-