Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ICT Robotics Proposal
ICT Robotics Proposal
An Investigatory Project
Submitted by:
Kirstein Jillian D. Recto
Arabella Nicole Psychelendre Baran
Felmarey J. Guillen
Eunice Kyla U. Mapisa
10- Einstein
Submitted to:
Christian Erad
ICT Adviser
Introduction
Over the centuries, researchers and professional have struggled to conserve the marine
biodiversity due to the continuous practice of destructive human activities and institutional
inaction. Several areas of the world are experiencing marine habitat loss mainly from manmade
stresses such as water pollution and dynamite fishing (National Geographic, 2021). According to
Munyi (2009), 70% of the fishermen uses destructive fishing methods over the past 18-35 years.
Major driving forces for the use of destructive fishing methods are; perceived efficiency of
destructive gears, availability of cheap but destructive gears in the market, declining catches and
desperation among the fishermen, passive acceptance of some destructive gears at localized
levels and low levels of education among the fishermen. Some of the destructive gears lead to
excessive bycatch and juvenile wastage thus threatening sustainability. On the other hand, nine
million of the Filipinos rely on unsafe water supplies. In fact, water pollution and a lack of
proper sewage kill 55 people in the Philippines every day (The Borgen Project, 2019). These
issue affects not only the Earth’s marine life but the health of the people who is experiencing it,
thus the immobilization of water pollution and dynamite fishing has taken on a new urgency.
In the Philippines, the country's resources in municipal waters are lightly to heavily
exploited and overfished. Mangrove resources have already been depleted, and both municipal
and commercial fisheries suffer from overfishing caused by an increase in the number of fishers
and open access to fisheries. Commercial fishing boats continue to operate in municipal waters,
causing resource users to clash. Destructive fishing methods (such as dynamite and cyanide
fishing, as well as the use of fine mesh net fishing gear) have aided in the rapid decline of fish
stocks and habitat degradation. Bycatch and discards in trawl and other fisheries have recently
been cited as a threat to the country's fisheries' long-term viability (Lamarca, 2018). Moreover, a
study published in the Philippine Journal of Science reports that reefs in the country’s territorial
waters are no longer in excellent condition, and that 90% are classified as either poor or fair. In
response, several measured were undertaken to cease the decimation in marine biodiversity of
the country but it has produced mixed results due to the absence of serious enforcement
Additionally, this study could help the economy and the marine life have a healthy and
safe environment. Furthermore, this could lead to further research and production of robotic
devices that could help reduce the water pollution and immobilize the destructive fishing
Research Questions
a.) Is the Arduino based water pollution and dynamite fishing alerting device effective in
decreasing the water pollution and dynamite fishing in the marine biodiversity?
b.) Is there a significant difference between the application of the alerting device and
without the application of the alerting device in the marine ecosystem (oceans, rivers,
seas, etc.)?
General objectives
To further cease the issue, this study tries to invent a device that can aid the problem by
introducing an alerting device that can detect any signs of water pollution and dynamite fishing
Specific objectives:
alerting devices effective in decreasing the water pollution and dynamite fishing in the
marine biodiversity.
2. To determine if there is a significant difference between the application of the alerting
device and without the application of the alerting device in the marine ecosystem (oceans,
Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis
Arduino-based water pollution and dynamite fishing alerting device has no significant
effect in decreasing the water pollution and dynamite fishing in the marine biodiversity.
Alternative Hypothesis
Arduino-based water pollution and dynamite fishing alerting device has a significant
effect in decreasing the water pollution and dynamite fishing in the marine biodiversity.
Bibliography
Marine Habitat Destruction. (2021, May 3). National Geographic.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/critical-issues-marine-habitat-
destruction
Water Pollution in the Philippines. (2019, December 16). The Borgen Project.
https://borgenproject.org/water-pollution-in-the-philippines/
Munyi, F. (2015, November 6). The Social and Economic Dimensions of Destructive Fishing
http://www.seafdec.org/fisheries-country-profile-philippines/
Licuanan, A. M., Reyes, M. Z., Luzon, K., & Chan, M. A. A. (2017, June). Initial Findings of
146(2):177–185. ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318451686_Initial_Findings_of_the_Nationwid
e_Assessment_of_Philippine_Coral_Reefs_Philippine_Journal_of_Science_1462177-185
Garry, H. (2021, March 19). The Philippines’ Marine Biodiversity Faces Decimation. Earth.Org
decimation/
Almendral, A. (2018, June 16). In the Philippines, Dynamite Fishing Decimates Entire Ocean
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/15/world/asia/philippines-dynamite-fishing-coral.html