You are on page 1of 2

Nuclear Waste

Management

Hot isostatic pressing and conductivity, which are dependent on


waste-stream composition. In addition,

can substantially
the processes involved may lead to greater
radioactive volatile losses, more complex off-
gas systems and additional secondary wastes.

reduce the volume


HOT-ISOSTATIC PRESSING
GeoRoc’s Hot-Isostatic Pressing (HIPing)
technology is potentially an exciting
alternative treatment option for ILW wastes.

of nuclear waste
HIPing is an existing method used to densify
and consolidate materials by applying
isostatic pressure at an elevated temperature
in a pressure vessel. An inert gas, typically
argon, is used to pressurise the heated
vessel. For radioactive waste treatment, the
A graduate from the University of Sheffield, Dr Paul Heath of GeoRoc Ltd waste is sealed inside a specially designed
has a PhD in the application of hot-isostatic pressing (HIPing) technology canister before HIPing. As the temperature
to challenging and diverse radioactive waste streams. He currently leads and pressure inside the vessel increases, the
GeoRoc Ltd’s research on HIPing of nuclear waste streams from the materials placed in the canister react and
densify to produce stable, volume reduced
Sellafield site.

T
wasteforms.

THE BENEFITS
he UK will spend around taking valuable repository space which may GeoRoc have been investigating how the HIP
£117 billion on nuclear be costed by volume, and incurs additional process could be used to treat approximately
decommissioning within the waste transfer liabilities. The process is 5000 m3 of wastes (primarily magnesium
next century. Of this, around not ideally suited for all waste streams, for hydroxide sludges from Magnox fuel
70% of the financial expenditure example the presence of reactive metals elements and clinoptilolite slurries from SIXEP
is predicted to be focused on Sellafield, such as uranium may destabilise the cement, plant operations) from the Sellafield site in
the site of many ground-breaking nuclear leading to reduced stability and durability. the North West of England. The selection of
developments in the 20th century. Having a baseline treatment option for these sludge
successfully delivered concept and early Vitrification is the preferred option for high and slurry wastes is currently under review by
design projects based on Sellafield waste level wastes (HLW). It typically involves Sellafield Ltd.
streams, Dr Paul Heath and the team at calcining the waste materials and melting with
GeoRoc are working on an innovative new additives in order to immobilise radionuclides GeoRoc's work to date has shown that the HIP
technology, based on a hot-isostatic pressing and chemotoxic elements within a boro- treatment method is commercially feasible.
technique (HIPing). This technology could silicate based glass. Vitrification is also under A conceptual plant design detailing the
save up to £950 million in waste management investigation as a method for the treatment of treatment philosophy of these wastes has
and packaging costs and reduce the volume ILW. Although vitrification offers a significantly been delivered to Sellafield, supported by a
of sludge and slurry radioactive waste in reduced waste volume when compared to trial demonstrating that over 160 L of sludge
repositories by up to 90%. encapsulation, it is a complex process which can be processed in a single waste package.
requires exact control of process parameters This trial processed over 160 L of sludge
CURRENT WASTE TREATMENT such as the melt viscosity, crystallisation into a single 40 L HIP package. Following
In England and Wales, Intermediate Level
Waste (ILW) and High Level Waste (HLW)
(wastes exceeding 4 GBq / tonne α or 12 GBq
/ tonne β/γ) arising from current and historic
nuclear operations, are to be disposed of
at a single geological disposal facility, or
repository. Prior to deposition, wastes are
processed in order to be deemed passively
safe using existing waste treatment methods,
including cementation and melting into a

It has been shown that the HIP glass wasteform (vitrification).

process can produce dense, physically ILW is typically treated via cementation, which
encapsulates the waste products within a
robust wasteforms with large volume cement matrix to contain the radioactive

reductions from 100 % waste


products. However, this process typically
increases waste volumes by up to 400%,

26 27
Nuclear Waste
Management

The work performed by GeoRoc pushes additives to simulate the complex chemistry
of the sludge wastes and their effect on Detail
the boundaries of HIP technology processing was determined.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
for waste treatment, successfully The next phase looked at the extremes of
Sellafield’s waste inventory. By evaluating As the simulants for the feasibility made available to trial problematic wastes.
Dr Heath’s research focuses on the
disposal of nuclear waste. His recent
processing the largest demonstration the effect of varying particle size, carbonate studies are based on Magnox sludge We believe the operation of this pilot facility research has been related to the
waste, will additional studies need to be
wasteform to date
content, organic content, reactive metal will provide a step change in the acceptance application of hot-isostatic pressing in the
content and total waste loading, it was completed at other sites? of HIP as an option for treatment of the treatment of UK ILW sludges and slurries.
determined that suitable wasteforms could As the primary focus of all UK nuclear world’s most problematic legacy wastes.
be produced across the expected range operations is public safety, research FUNDING
the success of these two projects, GeoRoc’s and, specifically, its capacity to accommodate of sludge and slurry waste streams using into the treatment of each waste- • Innovate UK
process has become a viable alternative, the physical and chemical variations within the identical process parameters. stream is typically undertaken to ensure • Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
under consideration for the treatment of ILW waste stream and the properties of uranium- the process is suitable, whatever the
streams. doped radioactive samples. This further Finally, the project will produce and analyse proposed treatment methodology. The COLLABORATORS
research will demonstrate the feasibility of uranium-doped HIP samples. The samples will highly variable physical, chemical and • Martin Stewart (GeoRoc)
The advantages of this technology over using GeoRoc’s technology to treat these be based on the Magnox sludge composition radioactive properties of wastes around •S  am Moricca (AMEPT)
existing practices include increased highly variable waste-streams. and will characterise the behaviour of the world means no one solution is able •P  rof Neil Hyatt (ISL – University of
wasteform stability, significant waste volume radioactive material during processing. This to safely and effectively treat all wastes. Sheffield)
Comparison of waste volumes produced if
reductions and minimised secondary or UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES: will provide information on the speciation, Thermal treatment of wastes, such as HIP, Sellafield's ILW sludge and slurries were treated •D  r Sean Morgan (Sellafield Ltd)
operational wastes. This aligns with the THREE KEY PHASES wasteform quality and technical feasibility of offer significant improvements, ensuring by a variety of potential options (m3)
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s (NDA) Using simulants of the Magnox sludge and uranium inclusion within the HIP process. radioactive waste is treated safely by BIO
Research and Development 5 Year Plan to SIXEP sand/clinoptilolite slurry currently at reducing the volume and increasing the Can HIPing be applied to existing Dr Paul Heath has been leading GeoRoc’s
establish alternative waste treatments with a Sellafield, the first stage investigated the THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR WASTE long-term stability of the waste materials. cemented waste packages? Sludge and Slurry Treatment R&D
particular focus on volume reduction. science and reaction of the materials during TREATMENT While theoretically possible, it would programme for over two years.
processing, selecting a suitable combination GeoRoc’s technology has the potential Can this technology be applied to require some development effort with Since the start of his PhD, his
As a number of these wastes are poorly of additives and processing parameters. to significantly reduce the lifetime waste wastes from other industries e.g. oil, some front-end processing. There research has focused on the
characterised, Dr Heath and the team needed Subsequently, samples were loaded with management costs for radioactive waste gas, and mining? would also have to be a cost benefit development of treatment
to understand the flexibility of the HIP process non-radioactive caesium (Cs) and a range of liabilities. Savings could be made through Yes, one of the major benefits of HIP assessment undertaken by the waste options for radioactive wastes.
the production of fewer packages, a smaller technology in the treatment of radioactive owners to see if there was any value These studies have aimed to
repository and simplified logistics. This, in wastes is the flexibility to produce a range in further treating these packages.  The combine advanced, passively safe
turn, would reduce the environmental, safety of materials using the same processing packages are therefore not a current target wasteforms with industrially relevant
Vacuum and security risks associated with waste equipment. This is equally true of other for us. GeoRoc is focusing its development processing technologies.
handling and transport. wastes, especially heavy and toxic metals efforts on the higher hazard, untreated
produced from drilling and mining wastes, such as the Magnox sludges. CONTACT
These factors may save the NDA, and operations. HIP technology processes waste Dr Paul Heath, Materials Engineer,
therefore the taxpayer, several hundred in a sealed canister, which means the critical One potential issue with GeoRoc Ltd
million pounds. In addition, the use of HIP treatment parameters (e.g., temperature, decommissioning is the unavailability Unit 1 – Building 3
technology to treat these wastes is likely to pressure, time) are independent of the of historical operational data. Does this Advanced Manufacturing Park (AMP)
promote the long-term isolation of waste-stream properties. This allows the limit waste treatment options? Rotherham
radioactive and toxic materials, minimising same equipment to be used to design and The complexity and cost of obtaining S60 5WG
the risk of these elements reaching the produce metallic, ceramic, glass or glass- representative data for certain waste UK
environment in an uncontrolled way from ceramics materials at high waste-loadings, streams can severely limit their waste
interim storage facilities. based on the chemistry and physical treatment options. This is why the flexibility T: +44(0)7939 889 726
properties of the waste. afforded by HIP treatment and the research E: paul.heath@georoc.co.uk
Canister filling Evacuation/bake-out Sealed canister we have been performing on the waste W: www.georoc.co.uk
Having demonstrated the viability envelope is so important to supporting
Simultaneous application of heat and isostatic pressures of HIP for the treatment of Sellafield the commercial implementation of this
sludge and slurry wastes, what is the technology. For example, it has been
next step for full commercialisation of shown that the HIP process does not need
the technology? to accurately meter chemical additives as
GeoRoc have designed a functional pilot it has a broad chemical process window
plant. This facility will be the world’s first and can produce dense, physically robust
integrated and flexible demonstration wasteforms using 100 wt% waste. This
of HIP technology for the treatment of is true whether treating magnox sludge,
waste materials. The pilot facility has SIXEP sand/clinoptilolite or a combination
been designed to process wastes at a of the two, all under identical processing
commercially relevant scale (~1/10 – full scale conditions.
depending on waste stream) and will be

Canisters loading in HIP HIPing Waste Packaging

28 www.researchfeatures.com www.researchfeatures.com 29

You might also like