IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT INRE: COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT REGARDING BANKRUPTCY JUDGE SUZANNE H. BAUKNIGHT RIFIED COMPLAINT 1, Elliott J. Schuchardt, hereby verify under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, understanding and belief. 1. According to the Rules for Judicial Conduct and Judicial Disability Proceedings, it is appropriate to file « complaint against a federal judge for any of the following conduct: © using the judge’s office to obtain special treatment for friends or relatives; having improper discussions with parties or counsel for one side in a case; © retaliating against complainants, witnesses, or others for reporting judicial misconduct; or © violating other specific, mandatory standards of judicial conduct." 2. Thave evidence that Bankruptcy Judge Suzanne H. Bauknight engaged in all of the above proscribed conduct. I have incurred significant damages in connection with this matter. 3. Between May 18, 2016 and June 20, 2018, Bankruptcy Judge Baulknight issued — ‘on her own initiative — at least 87 rules to show cause targeting persons associated with my former law firm, Upright Law. A list of the sua sponte orders is attached as Exhibit A. 4. These orders were used for improper purposes. Bankruptoy Judge Bauknight used her orders to obtain material benefits for both herself and for a friend, who is a court- insider. That friend was paid $200,000 as a direct result of the sua sponte orders. Bankruptey Judge Bauknight also used her orders to force me to dismiss litigation and appeals involving both her, and her friend. 'R. Judicial Cond. & Judicial Disability Proc., Art. Il, § 4(a)(1)(A) & (C) & § 4(@)(4).5. _Ipreviously filed a judicial complaint in connection with this matter. I was forced to withdraw that complaint, due to ongoing harassment from Banlauptcy Judge Bauknight and her colleagues at the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility. The Board's staff attorney, Sandra Garrett, has filed five complaints against my license to practice law, in retaliation for my having reported these matters. This harassment is continuing as of this date, and is described in detail in this complaint. Background 6. have practiced law for neatly thirty years. I received a B.A. fom Comell University in 1989 and a J.D. fom Columbia Law School in 1993. 7. Twas formerly local counsel for Upright Law, the nation's first national consumer bankruptcy law firm, 8. Upright Law provides consumer bankruptey services through a network of attorneys located in all fifty states. The average local partner has at least twenty-five years of ‘experience in bankruptcy law. As of 2018, Upright Law was filing 1% of all of the consumer bankruptcy cases nationwide. That was an extraordinary achievement, which generated hostility among the local bankruptcy bar in many states. 9. Between 2016 and 2018, Bankruptey Judge Suzanne H. Bauknight used her federal bench to sua sponte target and harass persons working with Upright Law, in the Eastern District of Tennessee. She did this while she was overseeing litigation involving Upright Law, asa judge. This was a violation of 28 U.S.C. § 455 and Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. 10. Between May 18, 2016 and June 20, 2018, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight issued ~ on her own initiative -- at least 87 rules to show cause targeting persons associated with Upright Law. Her orders were addressed to a variety of persons associated with Upright Law. 11. The first orders sua sponte questioned the integrity and competence of Aftican- American attomey Grace Gardner. At that time, Ms. Gardner was the local partner for Upright Law in the Eastern District of Tennessee. She had a twenty-five year unblemished record in the Jaw. Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight used unsolicited orders to attack Ms. Gardner's record as a lawyer. She also used unsolicited orders to demand and personally review discovery on behalf of Upright Law’s adversaries, in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 455. She used these unsolicited orders to improperly suspend Ms. Gardner from practicing before the court for five years. This was an injustice, given the circumstances of this case. 12. On July 15, 2016, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight began to issue orders attacking the integrity and competence of Upright Law's management, located in Chicago. As with Ms Gardner, Bankcuptcy Judge Bauknight claimed to "already know the facts" regarding each order, in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 455. Her orders were addressed to Upright Law's managing partner, Kevin Cher, the firm's management, and attorney, Jason Allen.13, On April 27, 2017, Bankruptoy Judge Bauknight began to issue orders questioning Upright Law's legal fees, in bankruptcy cases pending before her. Between April 27, 2017 and December 27, 2017, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight sua sponte reduced Upright Law's fees to well-below the amount charged by other local bankruptey firms, No motion had ever been filed, challenging the fees. Improper Use of the Orders 14. All of these swa sponte orders materially benefitted a court-insider, who used the orders for her own benefit. 15. _ That person was attomey Gwendolyn Kemey, the standing chapter 13 trustee in the Eastem District of Tennessee. 16. After Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight began to issue her unsolicited orders, Kemey began demanding a large payment from Upright Law, to resolve the orders to show cause, Upon information and belief, Kemey demanded a payment of approximately $400,000 from Upright law. 17. Ultimately, Upright Law paid Kerney $200,000 in connection with this matter. It is unlikely that Upright Law would have made such payment, if Upright Law had not been required to resolve Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight's sua sponte orders. 18, Astonishingly, no case was ever filed against Upright Law. Kemey filed a single motion against Upright Law — on August 12, 2016 — after Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight had already started created issues involving Upright Law, by means of her own, unsolicited orders. 19, The settlement was improper, and was obtained at the expense of attorney Grace Garcner. Federal law specifically prohibits a federal judge from ruling on a case where the judge claims to have "knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts," as Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight claimed, with respect to Ms. Gardner. 28 U.S.C. § 455 (2023), Pattern of Retaliation 20. After Ms. Gardner was removed from the court, I replaced Ms. Gardner as the local partner for Upright Law, in the Eastern District of Tennessee. Like Ms. Gardner, I had been practicing bankruptcy law for twenty-five years, and had an unblemished record in the law. 21. On August 3, 2017, I advised Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight that her suc sponte orders attacking Upright Law's fees were creating the appearance of improper communication between Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight and Upright Law's adversaries, in violation of Bankruptey Rule 9003, 22. Rather than simply ruling on the objection, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight retaliated against me for making the objection, She claimed that I had "no evidence" of ex parte communications, and sua sponte sanctioned me for making the objection.23. Meanwhile, Bankruptey Judge Bauknight failed to disclose that she had a history of sua sponte attacking my predecessors with Upright Law, for the benefit of Kerney. 24, I did not appeal the order, out of respect for Bankruptey Judge Bauknight. ‘However, she continued to use her federal bench to harass me, by means of dozens of sua sponte orders benefiting her friend, Kerney. Further Retaliation 25. On December 29, 2017, I filed suit against chapter 13 trustee Kerney in Tennessee state court” ‘The complaint alleged that Kemey was using her position with the federal government to engage in a pattern of harassment against Upright Law. The complaint sought damages from Kerney for slander and tortious interference with contract 26. A few days later, Upright Law's managing partner, Kevin Chern, contacted me by telephone. At that time, Chen was engaging in settlement negotiations with Kemey. Chem told me that Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight and Kemey were going to "destroy my license to practice law," if I did not dismiss the lawsuit against Kemey. I told Chem that that couldn't happen, and refused to dismiss the lawsuit 27. ‘Two days later, on January 9, 2018, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight issued seventeen orders to show cause against me, on her own initiative. 28. The orders accused me of engaging in "incompetence" in the practice of bankruptcy law ~- even though I had been successfully practicing bankruptcy law for twenty-five years, at that point, 29. believe that these orders were an abuse of process, due to their frivolous nature. For example, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight accused me of "missing hearings" that I was not required to attend, She accused me of "delaying cases" when she couldn't show a day of delay. She accused me of filing a "non-compliant chapter 13 plan," but couldn't explain how the plan ‘was non-compliant, ? The case was filed in the Chancery Court for Knox County, Tennessee under the caption, Schucharat v. Kerney, Case No. 195055-3. * The orders are described on Exhibit A. * When I later tried to litigate these issues, I was denied a hearing, and summarily suspended from practicing before the court for two years. Jn re Schuchardi, B.D. Tenn., Case No. 3:18- MC-39-TAV (2019). On the day the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit agreed to hear the appeal, the State of Tennessee sued me for dozens of additional frivolous allegations. Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight is working with counsel for the State of Tennessee, Sandra Garrett, in connection with many of these attacks on my license and reputation.30. Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight used these orders for her own purposes. Bankruptey Judge Bauknight agreed to dismiss the rules to show cause only if I dismissed the state court case against her friend, Kemey. Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight also demanded that I dismiss appeals of two of her own orders, involving trustee Kemney. In one of these orders, she used her bench to quash discovery relating to the state court case against Kemey. 31. Rather than litigate against Bankruptey Judge Bauknight, I accepted her terms and agreed to dismiss the lawsuit against her friend, Kemey. This was an injustice, because the case ‘was not decided on the merits. I was forced to dismiss the case solely to resolve Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight's sua sponte attacks on my license to practice law, By attacking my license, she was openly interfering with pending litigation, for the benefit of her friend Kemey. The settlement was documented by means of a consent order entered on February 8, 2018.° Further Retaliation 32. Bankruptey Judge Bauknight continued to use her federal office to retaliate against my license and reputation. 33. On June 19, 2018, I appealed two additional sua sponte orders, entered by Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight.° 34. _ Bankruptey Judge Bauknight used her federal bench to retaliate the next day. On June 20, 2018 ~ Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight issued nineteen additional rules to show cause against me, on her own initiative, 35. There is an appearance that Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight intended to use these unsolicited orders to force me to dismiss the appeals that I had filed the day before -- as she had done with her unsolicited orders entered on January 9, 2018. 36. There was no other purpose for the orders entered on June 20, 2018. All of the matters in the orders to show cause had previously been litigated. Some had been resolved only days earlier. The unsolicited orders were a patent violation of res judicata. 37. In addition ~ as Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight had done with Grace Gardner ~ her orders entered on June 20, 2018 sua sponte demanded the production of discovery. This was the same method that Bankruptey Judge Bauknight had used to remove Grace Gardner from the court for five years, 5 See In re Sandra G. Brown, Bankr. E.D. Tenn., Case. No. 17-bk-30221. © The orders were entered in the cases of In re Jason & Linda Edington, Banks. E.D. Tenn., Case No, 3:18-bk-30299-SDR and In re Webb, E.D. Tenn, Case No. 3:18-bk-31418-SHB. 7 See In re Sandra G. Brown, Bankr, B.D. Tenn., Case. No. 17-bk-30221.38. Judges are not permitted to conduct discovery in cases pending before them. It is a per se violation of due process. As one court has explained: Whey a judge becomes a participant in judicial proceedings, a shadow is cast upon judicial neutrality, "particularly when the judge actively secks the production of evidence that the partics themselves never sought to present." LP. v. State, 718 So.2d 251, 252 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (quoting Chastine v. Broome, 629 So.2d 293, 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)). .. A judge should "never suggest or advise counsel how to try his or her case.” Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Marquez, 180 So.3d 219, 221 n.2 (Fla, 34 DCA 2015) (citing Shore Mariner Condo. Ass'n v. Antonious, 722 So.2d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), for the proposition that "[tJrial judges must studiously avoid the appearance of favoring one party in a lawsuit, and suggesting to counsel or a party how to proceed. strategically constitutes a breach of this principle").® 39. In the Upright Law case, Bankruptey Judge Bauknight improperly litigated the case from the bench, for the benefit of both herself and trustee Kemey. ation of 28 U.S.C. § 455 40. All of Bankruptey Judge Bauknight’s sua sponte orders were entered in violation of federal law. Specifically, the orders violate the judicial disqualification rules, set forth at 28 US.C, § 455. 28 U.S.C. § 455 states as follows: Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances: Where he has _a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts conceming the proceeding. . 28 US.C. § 455 (2023) (emphasis added). 8 DiGiovanni v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., No. 2D15-4180, 2017 WL 1277737, at *2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Apr. 5, 2017) (emphasis added). See also Lyles v. State, 742 So. 2d 842, 843 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999) ("The trial court committed fundamental error by sua sponte ordering Lyles fingerprints for the purpose of identification and bifurcating the hearing to allow additional testimony.")41. The above law requires a judge to recuse herself from a matter if the judge has personal bias towards a party, or if the judge's impartiality "might reasonably be questioned." Id 42. 28 US.C. § 455 also requires a judge to recuse herself if she has "personal knowledge" of disputed evidentiary facts. Id. 43, Both provisions applied to Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight's conduct. The orders — entered over two years against a variety of persons -- demonstrates a pre-existing bias against persons associated with Upright Law, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight also repeatedly claimed to have "personal knowledge of the facts," with respect to many of the orders. 44, When I litigated these issues, I advised Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight of the substance of 28 U.S.C. § 455. She repeatedly refused to comply with the statute, and to recuse herself. 45. In 2022, Congress passed legislation intended to improve compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 455. That legislation tightened the financial disclosure rules. However, as indicated by this letter, the problems with the federal courts are continuing, due to the lack of independent oversight of the federal judiciary. Ongoing Retaliation 46. For the past five years, Bankruptcy Judge Baukmight has been retaliating against my license to practice law in the State of Tennessee. 47, She has filed numerous complaints against me with the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility, and is working with the Board's staff attorney, Sandra Garrett, to damage my law license, for having reported her conduct in this matter. 48. Over the past five years, Garrett has filed dozens of frivolous claims against my license to practice law. Not one of these claims has identified a penny of loss or a day of delay in any case, Not one of my clients has appeared for any hearing whatsoever. 49. In my mind, there is no question that Garrett's claims have been filed at the request of -- and for the benefit of -- Bankruptey Judge Bauknight. 50. Garrett first attacked my license to practice law on June 6, 2018, at the request of Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight. Since then, she has continually used her state office to retaliate against me for the Bauknight complaint. SL For example, on August 27, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit agreed to hear an appeal of an order based on Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight's complaints against my license to practice law. ‘The order was docketed by the clerk of the Sixth Circuit on the morning of August 27, 2021. 52, Approximately three hours later ~ on that same day -- Sandy Garrett filed dozens of frivolous claims against my law license with the Tennessee Board of ProfessionalResponsibility. As with Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight's attacks on my license, Garrett focused on frivolous matters that were not violations within the plain meaning of the rules. 53. As of this date, Garrett has filed a total of five petitions attacking my license to practice law in Tennessee. At least three of these petitions were commenced at the request of Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight. The other petitions were filed on January 14, 2022, April 7, 2022 and July 25, 2022. 54, After I sought discovery in one of Garrett's cases, Garrett obtained an order preventing me from obtaining discovery or presenting evidence on the issue. (Such evidence ‘would have shown that Garrett was making false claims in the case.) $5. _ Garrett then sought and obtained an ex parte order from the Tennessee Supreme Court immediately preventing me from practicing law in Tennessee. When I sought a hearing in connection with this matter, Garrett obtained an order from the Tennessee Supreme Court denying me a hearing, and preventing me from presenting any evidence on these issues. This is not fair play, and is simply retaliation for defending my reputation in this forum. 56. On September 29, 2022, I filed a civil complaint against Garrett and the State of Tennessee in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. The complaint alleges that Garrett is using her office with the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility to file frivolous and knowingly-false claims for political reasons -- namely, to retaliate against me for having filed a judicial complaint against Bankruptey Judge Baulmight. The complaint also contends that Garrett has a history of using her employment with the State of Tennessee to engage in political retaliation for the benefit of government officials.” 57. Tam also reporting this matter widely to persons in the Tennessee legislature, to seek rule changes in the Tennessee courts, ° The case is filed under the caption, Schuchardt v. Tennessee, Case No. 3:22-cv-00762.Interference With This Process 58. As explained above, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight has continuously interfered with this investigation process. 59. I was forced with withdraw an earlier version of this complaint, due to Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight's attacks on my license to practice law in Tennessee." 60. I have repeatedly reached out to Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight and Garrett to resolve these matters, in a respectful manner. 61. However, Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight and Garrett have continued their attacks on my license and reputation. I therefore would like to pursue this complaint against Bankruptcy Judge Bauknight to the fullest extent. 62. _ Ihave previously reported these matters to other courts in the Judicial Conference and to the Tennessee Supreme Court. My complaints have been met with silence, and more often, with retaliation against my license to practice law. 63. _ Tam actively reaching out to members of Congress to resolve these matters. I have reported this matter fo persons serving on the Judiciary Committees for the U.S. Senate and the ULS. House of Representatives. I believe that my letters have contributed to the recent focus on judicial ethies in both Congress and the United States media, 64, I would very grateful for any assistance that you can provide in connection with ‘this matter. Very truly yours, ttt hile. Blliott J. Schuchardt Enel. '© | was also forced to dismiss other litigation relating to this matter, in efforts to resolve Bankruptey Judge Bauknight's attacks on my license in Tennessee. This includes an appeal that I filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, relating to this matter. [ also dismissed two motions pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in an effort to resolve the attacks on my state law license.Sua Sponte Orders Issued by Bankruptcy Judge Suzanne Bauknight In connection with Upright Law Litigation May 2016 to Jun 6 2018 Date Case Docket Subject Benefit No. of Order | 1 | 3/8/2016 |Tare Clara 32 | Grace Gardner, | Benefitted Kemey ‘Wright, Case No. local partner for | in Upright Law 3:16-bk-30917. Upright Law. litigation. 2 ‘5/18/2016 | In ze Willette 31 | Grace Gardner, “Benefitted Kemey | Dawn Terrell, local partner for | in Upright Law Upright Law. litigation. 3 3/18/2016 | Inze Tymira 27 | Grace Gardner, Benefitted Kerney | Jame'a Teneell, local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16-bk- Upright Law. litigation. | 30919 a 6/22/2016 | Inte Anneite 39 | Grace Gardner, Benefitted Kemney Harris Haynes, Jocal partner for in Upright Law Case No. 3:16-bk- Upright Law. litigation. 30352. 5 6/22/2016 | Inze Pamela Jo 38 | Grace Gardner, Benefitted Kemey | Hagstrom, Case local partner for | in Upright Law No. 3:16-bk- Upright Law. litigation. 31214 | € | 6723/2016 | Inte Clara %5 | Grace Gardner, | Benefitted Kemey | ) Wright, Case No. local partner for} in Upright Law 3:16-bk-30917. Upright Law. litigation. 7 | 6232016 |inre Willette 4] | Grace Gardner, | Benefitted Kemey Dawn Terrell, local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- ‘Upright Law. litigation. bk-30918Exhibit |” Date Case Dooket Subject Benefit ‘No. No. of Order 8 | 623/016 |InreTymia 38 | Grace Gardner, | Benelitied Kemey Jame'a Terrel local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Upright Law. litigation. bk-30919 9 | 73/2016 |InzePamela To 47 _ | Sua sponte Benefitied Kemney Hagstrom, Case ordered discovery | in Upright Law No. 3:16-bk- for the benefit of | litigation. 31214 Kemey. 10 | 715/016 | ate Clara 38 | Upright Law Benefitied Kemney Wright, Case No. in Upright Law 3:16-bk-30917. Kevin Chem, litigation. Managing Partner for Upright Law Jason Allen, attorney for Upright Law. 10 | 7/15/2016 | In ze Annette 4% | Upright Law Benefitted Kemey Harris Haynes, in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Kevin Chem, Titigation. bbk-30352. Managing Partner for Upright Law Jason Allen, attorney for Upright Law. 10 | 7isa0i6 | Inre Willette 39__| Upright Law Benefitied Kemey Dawn Terrell, in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Kevin Chern, litigation, bk-30918, Managing Partner for Upright Law Jason Allen, attorney for Upright Law.Date ‘Case | Docket ‘Subject Benefit | No of Order == i 10 | 713016 [inre Tymira 30 | Upright Law Benefitted Kemey Jame'a Terrell, in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Kevin Chem, litigation. bi-30919 Managing Partner | for Upright Law Jason Allen, attorney for Upright Law. 10 | 713016 | Inze Pamela To 35__| Upright Law Benefitied Kemey Hagstrom, Case in Upright Law No. 3:16-bk- Kevin Cher, litigation, 31214 Managing Partner for Upright Law Iason Allen, attorney for Upright Law. Ti | 7132016 | Inze Willette 61 | Grace Gardner, | Benefitted Kemey Dawa Terrell local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Upright Law. litigation. bk-30918 [12] 752016 | Inve Annette 50 | Grace Gardner, Benefitted Kemey | Harris Haynes, local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Upright Law. litigation, bk-30352. [137 7/15/2016 | Tore Tymira 49 | Grace Gardner, Benefitted Kemey Jame'a Terrell. local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Upright Law. litigation. bk-30919 _ | i@_ | "7222016 | Inre Clara 69 | Grace Gardner, | Benefitted Kemey ‘Wright, Case No. local parmer for | in Upright Law 3:16-bk-30917. Upright Law. litigation,Exhibit] Date Case Docket ‘Subject No. of Order 15 7/22/2016 | Inr tt 58 | Sua sponte ‘Benefitted Kemey Harris Haynes, ordered discovery | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- for the benefit of | litigation. bx-30352. Kerney, 16 | 72/2016 | Ine Willette 72 | Sua sponte ‘Bonefitied Kemey Dawa Terrell, ordered discovery | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- for the benefit of | litigation. bk-30918 Kemey. 17 | 772272016 | In re Willette 73 | Grace Gardner, |” Benefitted Kerney Dawn Terrell local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Upright Law. litigation, bk-30918 18 | 7222016 | Tare Tymira 63 | Grace Gardner, | Benefitted Kerney Jamela Terrell. local pariner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- ‘Upright Law. litigation, bk-30919 19 | 7220016 Inre Tymira 4 | Sua sponte Benefitied Kemey Jamela Terrell ordered discovery | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- for the benefit of | litigation. bk-30919 Kerney. 20 | 7725/2016 | Inte Annette 66 | Grace Gardner, | Benefitied Kemey Harris Haynes, local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Upright Law. litigation. bk-30352. 2 | 78/2016 | Tne Annette 73 | Grace Gardner, | Benefitied Kemey Harris Haynes, local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Upright Law. litigation. bk-30352.Exhibit | Date Case Docket Subject Benefit No. of Order 2 | 8/18/2016 | Inte Clara 87 | Upright Law Benefitied Kemey ‘Wright, Case No. in Upright Law 3:16-bk-30917. Kevin Chern, litigation. Managing Partner for Upright Law. Jason Allen, attomey for Upright Law. 2 | 8182016 | inre Annette 97 | Upright Law Benefitted Kemey Harris Haynes, in Upright Law Case No, 3: Kevin Chem, litigation. bbk-30352 Managing Partner for Upright Law. Jason Allen, attorney for Upright Law. 24 | 8/9/2016 |InrePamela Jo 96 | Upright Law Benefitted Kemey Hagstrom, Case in Upright Law No. 3:16-bk- Kevin Chern, litigation. 31214 Managing Partner for Upright Law. Jason Allen, attomey for ‘Upright Law. 2 | 8/23/2016 | Inze Annette 106 | Grace Gardner, | Benefitted Kerney Harris Haynes local partner for | in Upright Law Case No. 3:16- Upright Law. litigation, bk-30352. 26 4/19/2017 | Inxe Phillip & 46 ~~ | Elliott Benefitted Kerney Juanita Bennett, ‘Schuchardt, in Upright Law Case No. 3:17- local partner for | litigation. bk-30421. Upright Law.Exhibit] Date Case Docket Subject Benelit No. of Order 27 | 42772017 [In xe Clifford 13 | Upright Laws Benefitted Kemey Collette, Case No. fee. in Upright Law 3:1 7-bk-31254. litigation, 28 | 42772017 | inte Eva Griffith, [~ 15 | Upright Laws Benelitied Kemey Case No. 3:17- fee. in Upright Law bk-30434 litigation. 2 | 47/2017 | Tare Troy and 19 | Upright Laws Benefitted Kemey Ashley Sensaboy, fee. in Upright Law Case No. 3:17- litigation. bk-30753. 30 | 42772017 [InreAndrewand |" 24 | Upright Laws Benefitted Kemey ‘Casandra Venuk, fee. in Upright Law Case No. 3:17- litigation. bk-30485. 31 | 47282107 | Tare Jennifer 20 | Upright Law's Benefitied Kemey Annable, Case fee. in Upright Law No. 3:17-bk- litigation. 30681. 32 | 48/2017 | InreDebiKey 20 | Upright Laws Benefitied Kemey Ash, Case No. fee. in Upright Law 3:1 7-bk-30477. litigation. 33 | 4/28/2017 | Inze David and 15 | Upright Law's Benefitied Kemey ‘Marilyn Mayes, fee. in Upright Law Case No. 3:17- litigation, bk-30767, 34 | 5/1/2017 [Tate Richard 22 | Sua sponte Benefitted Kemey MecA\tee, Case attacked Upright | in Upright Law No. 3:17-bk- Law's work ona | litigation. 30395. reaffirmation agreement. 35 | 752017 | Inte Rand: 13 | Upright Laws Benefitied Kemey Carter, Case No. fee. in Upright Law 3:17-bk-32046. litigation.Date Case De Subject Benefit No. of Order 36 7(5(2017 | Inre Shirley Ann 12 | Upright Law's Benefitted Kerney England, Case fee. in Upright Law No. 3:17-bk- litigation. 32050. 37 ‘W/S12017 Inze Jennifer 13 Upright Law's Benefitted Kerney Roberts, Case No. fee. in Upright Law 3:1 7-bk-31543. litigation. 38 | 752017 | Tnre Courtney 16 | Upright Law's Benefitted Kemey Schott, Case No. fee. in Upright Law 3:1 7-bk-31703. litigation. 39 | 762017 [Inte Mitchell and |" 15 | Upright Laws Benefitted Kemey Whittany Dies, fee. in Upright Law Case No. 3:17- litigation. bk-32048, 40 | 762017 [InteRoy and 13 | Upright Laws Benefitied Kemey Angela Herron, fee. in Upright Law Case No. 3:17- litigation. ‘bk-32051 41 | 8/4/2017 | Tare Jennifer 21 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey Roberts, Case No. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:1 7-bk-3 1543, local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. 4a | 172017 [Inte Perry 38 _| Sua sponte ‘Benefitied Kemey Dupree, 3:17-bk- conducted in Upright Law 32158-SHB. discovery against | litigation. ‘Schuchardt. 42 | 1221/2017 | Inte Joshua & 2 | Schuchardt's fee. | Benefitied Kemey ‘Tressa Webb, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-33145- litigation. SHB. 4% | 192018 | Inte Sandra 30 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey Brown, 3:17-bk- ‘Schuchardt, in Upright Law 30221-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law.Date ‘Case Docket ‘Subject Benoit No. of Order % | 19018 [InzeEva Jean 31 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey Griffith, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 30434-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. % | 1/9018 | Tnre Debi Kay 31 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey ‘Ash, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 30477-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. 4% | Woa0i8 | Inte Andrew & 75 | Elliot Benefitied Kemey Cassandra Venuk. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-30485- local partner for | _ litigation. SHB. Upright Law. % | 192018 [Inre Jennifer 38 | Elliot Bencfitied Kemey Annable, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 30681-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. ® | 192018 | Inze Troy & 68 | Elliot Benefiited Kemey Ashley Sensaboy, Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-30753- local partner for litigation. SHB. Upright Law. % | 92018 [Tare David & 37 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey ‘Marilyn Mayes, Schucherdt, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-30767- local partner for | _ litigation. SHB. Upright Law. 4% | 1972018 | Inze Clifford 47 | Elliott Benefitted Kerney Collett, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 31254-SHB. local partner for litigation. Upright Law. % | 1W9R018 [Inre Jennifer 48 | Elliott Benefitied Kemey Roberts, Case No. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-3 1543, local partner for | litigation. Upright Law.Date Case Docket Subject Benefit No. of Order | 192018 [Inte Heather 4 [Elliott Benofitted Kemey Kirkland, 3:17- Schucharat, in Upright Law bbk-31678-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. 43 | 19018 |InzeRoyTaylor, | 42 | Elliot Benefitied Kemey 3:17-bk-31918- Schuchardt, in Upright Law SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. 43 | 190018 |InzePery 90 | Elliot Benefitied Kerney Dupree, 3:17-ble Schuchardt, in Upright Law 32158-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. ® | sno 38 | Bilioit Benefitied Kemey Schuchardt, in Upright Law 32376-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. % | 192018 | Inte Melis 30 [Elliot ‘Benefitted Kemey Madden, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 32815-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. 43 1/9/2018 Inre Josn EET Elliott Benefitted Kemey Tressa Webb. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-33145- local partner for | litigation. SHB. Upright Law. 4% | 1972018 | Tare Sandra 29 | Elion Benefitted Kemey Bennett, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 33204-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. % | i9n0i8 | Tnse ce 19 | Elliot Benefitted Kemey Martha Schuchardt, in Upright Law ‘McFarland, 3:17- Jocal partner for | litigation. bk-33413-SHB. Upright Law.Date Case Docket Subject Benefit No. of Order 44 | 2713/2018 [Tne Joshua & 48 | Schuchardts fee. | Benefitied Kemey Tressa Webb, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-33145- litigation. SHB. 4% | 3702018 | Ine Jason and 36 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey Linda Edington, Schuchardt, in Upright Law Case No. 3:18- local partner for | litigation. ‘bk-30299-SHB. Upright Law. 46 | S/02018 | Inre Tressa 10 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey ‘Webb, Case No. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:18-bk-31418- local partner for | litigation. SHB. Upright Law. 47 | 3725/2018 | Inve Tressa 10 | Biliott Benefitted Kemney Webb, Case No. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:18-bk-31418- local partner for | _ litigation. SHB. Upright Law. 48 | 6720/2018 | Inre Sandra 73 | Elliott Benefitted Kerney Brown, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 30221-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law. 48 | 62072018 | Inte Eva Jean 73 | Elliot Benelitied Kemey Griffith, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 30434, local partner for | litigation. ‘Upright Law 4 | 67202018 | Inxe Debi Kay 73 | Biliow Benefitted Kerney ‘Ash, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 30477-SUB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law 4 | 62072018 | Inxe Andrew & 97 | Elliott Benefitied Kemey Cassandra Venuk, ‘Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-30485- local partner for | litigation. SHB. Upright Law 10Date ‘Case jocket ‘Subject Benefit No. of Order 48 | 6/20/2018 | Inte Jennifer 80 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey Annable, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 30681-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law % | 672072018 | Inre Troy & 93 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey Ashley Sensaboy. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:17-Dk-30753- local partner for | _ litigation SHB. Upright Law 4 | 67202018 | Tare David & 79 | Elliott Benefitied Kemey far Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:17-bk-30767- local partner for | litigation. SHB. Upright Law 48 | 6720/2018 | Tnre Clifford 71 | Elliott Bencfitied Kemey Collett, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 31254-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law 48 | 6720/2018 | Tne Jennifer 76 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey Roberts, Case No. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:1 7-bk-31543, local partner for | _jitigation. Upright Law. 4% | 6720/2018 | Ine Heather 64 [Elliott Benefitted Kemey Kirkland, 3:17- Schuchardt, in Upright Law bk-31678-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law 4 | 6720/2018 |TnseRoyTavior, | 64 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey 3:17-bk-31918- Schuchardt, in Upright Law SHB. local partner for | _ litigation. Upright Law 4% | 6720/2018 | TnzePerry 130 | Elliott Benefitted Kemey Dupree, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 32158-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law uGwendolyn Kerney $200,000 to settle rules to show cause, Exhibit Date ‘Case Docket Subject Benefit of Order 48 | 6202018 | Inte Austin 60 | Elliott Benefitted Kerney Roberts, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 32376-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law 48 6/20/2018 | In re Melissa 54 Elliott Benefitted Kerney Madden, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 32815-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law 48 | 6/20/2018 | Inte Joshua & 36 | Elliott Benelitied Kemey ‘Schuchardt, in Upright Law | local partner for | litigation Upright Law 4% | 6720/2018 | Tare Sandra 39_| Elliot Benefitied Kemey Bennett, 3:17-bk- Schuchardt, in Upright Law 33204-SHB. local partner for | litigation. Upright Law 48 | 6202018 | inzeLawrence& | 49 | Elliott Benefitied Kemey Martha | Schuchardt, in Upright Law ‘McFarland, 3:17- local partner for | _ litigation. bk-33413-SH Upright Law 48 | 6/20/2018 | Inze Jasona 82 | Elliott ~ | Benefitted Kerney ‘Linda Edington, Schuchardt, in Upright Law Case No. 3:18- local partner for | litigation. Dk-30299-SHB. ‘Upright Law a | 67202018 | Inte Tre 47 | Elliot Benefitted Kemney Webb, Case No. Schuchardt, in Upright Law 3:18-bK-31418- local partner for | litigation. SHB. Upright Law SAAS [Inze Cla 469 | Upright Law Wright, CaseNo. | & | agrees to pay 3:16-bk-30917, 475 | chapter 13 et. al. trustee 2