Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reasoning” to decide any dispute brought in front of a court of law. This application of mind is
made by a judge, who hears the case. A judge, though trained to decide such disputes while
applying the correct and apt laws, is but a human. Since the whole judicial system depends on
human beings, it is not immune to mistakes and errors. These errors can only be corrected and
checked by allowing the parties of a case to appeal the decisions of a court.
Under the Code of Civil Procedure, there are 4 classes f appeals which have been provided,
they are:
1. Appeals from the original Decrees (first appeal);
2. Appeals from appellate decrees (second appeal);
3. Appeals from orders;
4. Appeals to the Supreme Court.
This is known as “First Appeal”. It is permissible for the appellate court to re-examine
and re-appreciate the evidence, the first appeal. The right to institute the suit is an
inherent right, but the right of appeal is statutory. (Baldev Singh v. Surendra Mohan
Sharma, AIR 2003 SC 225)
In State Bank of India & Ors. v. S.N. Goyal, AIR 2008 SC 2594, the Supreme Court
explained the term ‘substantial question of law’, by observing that, “The word
‘substantial’ prefixed to ‘question of law’ does not refer to the stakes involved in the
case, nor intended to refer only to questions of law of general importance, but refers to
impact or effect of the question of law on the decision in the lies between the
parties.Substantial question of law’ means not only substantial questions of law of
general importance but also the substantial question of law arising in a case as between
the parties. ….. Any question of law which affects the final decision in a case is a
substantial question of law as between the parties. A question of law which arises
incidentally or collaterally, having no bearing on the final outcome, will not be a
substantial question of law.”
The high now has jurisdiction only on those appeals which involve a substantial question
of law set out in the memorandum of appeal and formulated by the High Court.