You are on page 1of 7

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress

open access to scientific and medical research

Open Access Full Text Article Original Research

The major risk factors for delirium in a


clinical setting
This article was published in the following Dove Press journal:
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
21 July 2016
Number of times this article has been viewed

Harin Kim Objective: We aimed to determine the major risk factors for the development of delirium in
Seockhoon Chung patients at a single general hospital by comparison with a control group.
Yeon Ho Joo Subjects and methods: We reviewed the medical records of 260 delirium patients and 77 control
Jung Sun Lee patients. We investigated age, sex, and risk factors for delirium in the total delirium group (n=260),
the delirium medical subgroup (n=142), and the delirium surgical subgroup (n=118). Logistic
Department of Psychiatry, Asan
Medical Center, University of Ulsan regression analysis adjusting for age and sex was performed to identify the odds ratio.
College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Results: The mean age and the percentage of males were significantly higher in the delirium
group compared with the control group (68.9 vs 54.3 years and 70% vs 41.6%, respectively).
Risk factors for the delirium group were lower plasma albumin, hypertension, mechanical
ventilation, and antipsychotic drug use. Plasma sodium level and hypertension were important
risk factors for the delirium medical subgroup. Stroke history, hypertension, ICU care, and
medication were important risk factors for the delirium surgical subgroup.
Conclusion: Lower plasma albumin, hypertension, mechanical ventilation, and antipsychotic
drug use are important risk factors for delirium.
Keywords: delirium, acute confusional state, psychiatric consultation, risk factor

Introduction
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)
defines delirium as a disturbance in attention and awareness over a short period of
time, representing a change from baseline attention and awareness, with a tendency to
fluctuate in severity during the course of a day.1 Delirium is a very common disorder
affecting ~15% of medical elderly inpatients.2 In a general population study, the preva-
lence of delirium was 1%–2% in subjects .65 years old and 10% in subjects .85 years
old.3 Patients with delirium have higher mortality and poor long-term prognosis.4,5 These
results are contrary to the common belief that delirium is a reversible condition and
suggest that active intervention should begin at diagnosis due to the adverse effects of
delirium on long-term functional outcomes.6–8 A recent systematic review of prospective
trials suggested that some pharmacological interventions, such as the use of haloperidol,
showed success in preventing delirium and in decreasing the duration and/or severity
of ongoing delirium, which is associated with better long-term outcomes.9
The most important aspect in the treatment and management of delirium is identify-
Correspondence: Jung Sun Lee ing and correcting the underlying causes. The causes of delirium are old age, male sex,
Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical
Center, University of Ulsan College
underlying cognitive impairment,10,11 infection, fever,12,13 hypoxia, hypoglycemia, elec-
of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, trolyte imbalance, general medical conditions such as cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic
Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Fax +82 2 485 8381
diseases,14 use of drugs such as benzodiazepine and narcotic analgesics,15,16 metabolic
Email js_lee@amc.seoul.kr disorders such as encephalopathy, and central nervous system diseases such as stroke,

submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12 1787–1793 1787
Dovepress © 2016 Kim et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S112017
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you
hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission
for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Kim et al Dovepress

traumatic brain injury, and epilepsy.17,18 In addition, major sluggishness, lethargy, or stupor; or 3) mixed – normal psy-
surgical procedures such as orthopedic and cardiovascular chomotor activity with disturbed attention and awareness, or
surgeries, conditions associated with major surgeries such rapid fluctuation between hyperactive and hypoactive states of
as somatic pain and cobalamin deficiency,19,20 and treatment delirium.1 Patients were deemed to have psychotic symptoms
environments such as ICUs are known risk factors.21 when further information from caregivers indicated that there
Most previous studies have investigated individual risk was evidence of hallucination or delusion.
factors for delirium separately in their respective clinical situ- The institutional review board of the Asan Medical Center
ations. Accordingly, their subjects were limited to those with approved the study, including the data collection and analy-
specific diseases or treatments, and their outcomes identified sis. As this study was performed retrospectively, informed
statistically significant risk factors for delirium.22–30 When the consent was not considered necessary by the institutional
results of these studies were compared with a meta-analysis review board.
of the risk factors for delirium, some risk factors such as age
and the use of benzodiazepine were relatively consistent, but Methods
others were not.31–33 For example, the presence of hyperten- This study collected data from medical records written by
sion or hypoalbuminemia was not associated with delirium psychiatrists who evaluated the patients. The delirium group
in one prospective study, while other evidence suggests that was divided into medical and surgical subgroups, each of
these factors are associated with delirium.14 Few studies have which was compared with the control group. The delirium
comprehensively examined the reported risk factors, and no medical subgroup included patients who were admitted
study has examined their relative importance. to the hospital but did not undergo surgery under general
In this study, we investigated the risk factors for delirium anesthesia, while the delirium surgical subgroup included
in patients referred for psychiatric consultation, diagnosis, patients who did undergo surgery under general anesthesia.
and management. We aimed to identify the risk factors for The overall severity of delirium was assessed by the Clinical
inpatients who underwent a major surgery under general Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale.
anesthesia and patients who did not. Age, sex, and risk factors for delirium were investigated
in the delirium and control groups. Risk factors consistently
Subjects and methods found in previous studies were comprehensively included and
Subjects categorized by past medical history, treatment environment,
We selected the delirium group and the control group from physical illness, and medication history. Past medical history
among patients referred to psychiatrists from August 2013 included delirium, dementia, stroke, gait disorder, falling,
to July 2014. The delirium group included patients who were neurologic diseases, and hypertension. In addition, alcohol
interviewed individually by psychiatrists and diagnosed with use within 1 week before delirium onset was noted, and activi-
delirium according to DSM-5 criteria. We excluded patients ties of daily living (ADL) were evaluated on a four-point scale
whose cognitive impairments or psychiatric symptoms using the caregiver interview conducted by a psychiatrist (1:
were caused by a psychiatric or neurologic disease, such requires maximum aid for daily living; 2: requires moderate
as hallucination, delusion, or abnormal behavior caused by aid; 3: requires minimum aid; 4: does not require aid).
schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, or mood symp- Treatment environments included ICU treatment and
toms resulting from major mood episodes. We also excluded the preventive use of chemical or physical restraints before
patients with Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, or the occurrence of delirium. Chemical restraint was defined
dementia with Lewy bodies. Patients with substance use as intravenous or intramuscular injection of a benzodiaz-
disorder were excluded because they might have had a epine or an antipsychotic drug, and physical restraint was
cognitive impairment indistinguishable from delirium. The defined as restraint of the upper or lower limbs. Chemical or
control group was selected from among patients referred to physical restraint used for patient safety after the occurrence
psychiatrists but not diagnosed with delirium. of delirium was not included as a risk factor.
Depending on the nature of the psychomotor disturbance Physical illness included surgery under general anesthesia
and DSM-5 specifier definition, delirium was classified as after admission, use of mechanical ventilation, and infection.
follows: 1) hyperactive – increased psychomotor activity that Infection was defined by laboratory tests, the identification
may be accompanied by mood lability, agitation, and/or refusal of pathogens in bacterial culture, or the empirical use of
to cooperate with medical care; 2) hypoactive – decreased antibiotics. The patient was considered immobile if he or
psychomotor activity that may be accompanied by she was unable to ambulate independently due to a physical

1788 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12
Dovepress
Dovepress Determination of risk factors for delirium

impairment such as fracture or a neurological disease, or if experienced hallucination and 52 patients (20%) experienced
absolute bed rest was ordered by the medical staff. Renal delusion. The mean severity was a Clinical Global Impression –
function was assessed by evaluating the blood urea nitrogen Severity scale (CGI-S) score of 4.0.
(BUN) and plasma creatinine (CR) levels, and hepatic func- There were no significant differences in terms of age,
tion was assessed by estimation of blood levels of aspartate sex, type of delirium, frequency of psychotic symptoms,
transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT), as well or CGI-S score between the two subgroups. There was a
as plasma albumin levels. Electrolyte imbalance was assessed significant difference in age between the medical subgroup
by determining sodium and potassium levels. (69.3±13.9 years, t=-7.06, P,0.001) and the surgical sub-
For medication history, all drugs used within 3  days group (68.4±11.9 years, t=-6.86, P,0.001) compared with
before the occurrence of delirium were explored. The overall the control group (54.3±16.8 years). There were more male
number of medications was counted, and the use of antipsy- patients in the medical subgroup (70.4%, χ2=17.37, P,0.001)
chotic drugs, anticholinergic drugs, antiepileptic drugs, and and the surgical subgroup (69.5%, χ2=14.97, P,0.001) than
narcotic analgesics was investigated. in the control group (41.6%) (Table 1).
In Step 1, we identified the potential risk factors by com-
Statistical methods parison with the control group: 1) By comparing the delirium
We compared age, sex, prevalence of psychotic symptoms group with the control group, we could find out that ADL
manifested as hallucinations or delusions, and the frequency of score, the BUN, CR, and plasma albumin levels number of
the delirium type between the delirium and control groups. We medications, past history of delirium and stroke, ICU care,
tried to identify the potential risk factors for delirium in two hypertension, mechanical ventilation, infection, immobility,
steps. In Step 1, we used Student’s t-tests or chi-square tests and use of antipsychotic drugs were the potential risk factors of
for demographic and clinical variables. In Step 2, variables delirium in the delirium group. 2) By comparing the delirium
with P,0.1 in Step 1 were entered into the next analysis of medical subgroup with the control group, we could find out
multiple logistic regression. We identified the odds ratio (OR) that ADL score, the BUN, CR, plasma albumin, and plasma
for each factor’s contribution to the occurrence of delirium sodium levels, past history of delirium and stroke, past history
using multiple logistic regression analysis, with adjustment of falls, hypertension, mechanical ventilation, infection, and
for age and sex. Statistical analyses were undertaken using use of antipsychotic drugs were the potential risk factors of
SPSS version 18 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and delirium in the delirium medical subgroup. 3) By comparing
a P-value ,0.05 was considered statistically significant. the delirium surgical subgroup with the control group, we
could find out that ADL score, the BUN, CR, and plasma albu-
Results min levels, number of medications, past history of delirium
We included 260 patients in the delirium group and 77 patients and stroke, ICU care, hypertension, mechanical ventilation,
in the control group. Among the patients in the delirium group, immobility, and the use of antipsychotic drugs, anticholinergic
142 patients (54.6%) were classified into the delirium medical drugs, and opioids were the potential risk factors of delirium
subgroup and 118 patients (45.4%) into the delirium surgi- in the delirium surgical subgroup (Tables 2 and 3).
cal subgroup. Most of the patients in the control group were In Step 2, we identified the risk factors for delirium after
diagnosed with major depression, adjustment disorder, sleep multiple logistic regression, after controlling for age and
disorder, panic disorder, or unspecified anxiety disorder. sex (results are presented as OR, 95% confidence interval
The mean age was 68.9  years (standard deviation [CI]): 1) In the delirium group, plasma albumin level (0.55,
[SD]:  ±13.0  years) in the delirium group and 54.3  years 0.32–0.94), hypertension (2.86, 1.21–6.72), mechanical
(SD:  ±16.8  years) in the control group. In addition, 182 ventilation (12.49, 1.13–138.00), and use of antipsychotic
patients (70%) in the delirium group and 32 patients (41.6%) drugs (4.07, 1.41–11.72); 2) In the delirium medical sub-
in the control group were male. The mean age of the delirium group, plasma sodium level (0.90, 0.83–0.98) and hyper-
group was significantly higher than that of the control group tension (2.91, 1.12–7.55); and 3) In the delirium surgical
(t=-8.05, P,0.001), and there were more male patients in subgroup, plasma albumin level (0.37, 0.16–0.87), number
the delirium group than in the control group (70% vs 41.6%, of medications (1.09, 1.00–1.18), past history of stroke
χ2=20.7, P,0.001). In the delirium group, 167 patients (1,817.71, 5.37–614,920.5), ICU care (17.95, 1.96–164.55),
(64.2%) had hyperactive delirium, 18 patients (6.9%) had hypertension (5.90, 1.39–25.09), and the use of antipsychotic
hypoactive delirium, and 75  patients (28.8%) had mixed drugs (14.57, 2.93–72.37), anticholinergic drugs (14.50,
delirium. Regarding psychotic symptoms, 91 patients (35%) 1.57–134.14), and opioids (6.10, 1.58–23.44) (Table 4).

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com


1789
Dovepress
Kim et al Dovepress

Table 1 Characteristics of the delirium and control groups


Characteristics Delirium group Control P-value
Total Medical Surgical group Total vs Medical Surgical Medical
subgroup subgroup control subgroup subgroup subgroup
vs control vs control vs surgical
subgroup
Number of patients, n (%) 260 142 (54.6%) 118 (45.4%) 77 – – – –
Age, years, mean ± SD 68.9±13.0 69.3±13.9 68.4±11.9 54.3±16.8 t=-8.05; t=-7.06; t=-6.86; t=0.52;
P,0.001 P,0.001 P,0.001 P=0.603
Male sex, n (%) 182 (70.0%) 100 (70.4%) 82 (69.5%) 32 (41.6%) χ2=20.7; χ2=17.37; χ2=14.97; χ2=0.027;
P,0.001 P,0.001 P,0.001 P=0.87
Psychotic symptoms
Hallucination, n (%) 91 (35.0%) 47 (33.1%) 44 (37.6%) – – – – χ2=0.57;
P=0.449
Delusion, n (%) 52 (20.0%) 31 (21.8%) 21 (18.0%) – – – – χ2=0.603;
P=0.438
CGI-S score, mean ± SD 3.99±0.8 4.01±0.88 3.96±0.81 – – – – t=0.395;
P=0.693
Type of delirium
Hyperactive, n (%) 167 (64.2%) 90 (63.4%) 77 (65.3%) – – – – χ2=1.28;
Hypoactive, n (%) 18 (6.9%) 8 (5.6%) 10 (8.5%) – – – – P=0.526
Mixed, n (%) 75 (28.8%) 44 (31.0%) 31 (26.3%) – – – – –
Abbreviations: CGI-S, Clinical Global Impression – Severity scale; SD, standard deviation.

Discussion for delirium. However, this study was designed to identify


In this study, the mean age of the subjects in the delirium the significant risk factors for delirium across a wide range
group was 14.6  years, which was greater than that of the of clinical settings and to evaluate the OR of each risk fac-
control group, and 70% of the delirium group comprised tor. Therefore, we adjusted for age and sex in the logistic
males, whereas only 41.6% of the control group were males. regression in Step 2.
This was concordant with previous reports that identified Among the psychomotor disturbance subtypes, hyperac-
age and male sex as the major risk factors for the develop- tive delirium was the most common (64.2%), while hypo-
ment of delirium.10,11,34 Age and sex, which are unmodifiable active delirium was the least common (6.9%). This result
through medical intervention, are demographic risk factors contrasts with the general opinion that mixed delirium is the

Table 2 Comparison between delirium group and control group in terms of risk factors for delirium (continuous variables)
Risk factors Delirium group (n=260), mean ± SD Control Comparisons between delirium group
group (n=77), and control group (P-value)
Total Medical Surgical mean ± SD Total Medical Surgical
subgroup subgroup delirium subgroup subgroup
vs control vs control vs delirium
Past medical history
ADL score 3.2±0.9 3.03±1.01 3.4±0.80 3.7±0.6 0.0001 ,0.0001 0.0308
Physical illness
BUN (mg/dL) 24.1±15.0 24.8±15.0 23.2±15.0 18.3±13.8 0.0026 0.0018 0.0226
Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.6±1.9 1.7±2.0 1.5±1.7 1.1±1.1 0.0105 0.0059 0.0410
AST (IU/L) 46.4±91.6 42.8±42.4 50.8±128.0 46.0±66.3 0.9729 0.6596 0.7639
ALT (IU/L) 42.8±104.4 40.3±53.5 45.9±143.8 42.6±67.2 0.9871 0.7762 0.8508
Albumin (g/dL) 2.7±0.6 2.7±0.6 2.8±0.7 3.2±0.7 ,0.0001 ,0.0001 0.0001
Sodium (mmol/L) 136.7±10.0 135.5±12.5 138.1±5.4 138.5±4.2 0.1118 0.041 0.5230
Potassium (mmol/L) 4.1±0.6 4.1±0.7 4.1±0.6 4.2±0.6 0.2631 0.2779 0.3546
Medication history
Number of drugs 11.5±6.3 10.4±4.7 12.8±7.6 9.5±4.9 0.0093 0.1599 0.0008
Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; SD, standard deviation.

1790 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12
Dovepress
Dovepress Determination of risk factors for delirium

Table 3 Comparison between delirium group and control group in terms of risk factors for delirium (categorical variables)
Risk factors Delirium group (n=260), n (%) Control, Comparisons between delirium group
n (%) and control group (P-value)
Total Medical Surgical Total Medical Surgical
subgroup subgroup delirium subgroup subgroup
vs control vs control vs control
Past medical history
Past delirium history 59 (22.7) 26 (18.3) 33 (28.0) 4 (5.2) 0.001 0.007 ,0.001
Dementia history 10 (3.9) 5 (3.5) 5 (4.2) 1 (1.3) 0.269 0.336 0.245
Stroke history 26 (10) 10 (7.04) 16 (13.56) 1 (1.3) 0.013 0.063 0.003
Ambulation difficulty 42 (16.2) 24 (16.9) 18 (15.3) 8 (10.4) 0.211 0.193 0.329
Falling history 18 (6.9) 13 (9.15) 5 (4.24) 2 (2.6) 0.158 0.067 0.547
Past neurologic history 39 (15.0) 23 (16.2) 16 (13.6) 11 (14.3) 0.877 0.709 0.886
Hypertension 124 (47.7) 67 (47.2) 57 (48.3) 12 (15.6) ,0.001 ,0.001 ,0.001
Alcohol use 9 (3.5) 3 (2.1) 6 (5.1) 3 (3.9) 0.857 0.440 0.699
Treatment environment
ICU care 66 (25.4) 29 (20.4) 37 (31.4) 9 (11.7) 0.011 0.103 0.002
Chemical restraint 76 (29.2) 38 (26.8) 38 (32.2) 0 (0) ,0.001 ,0.001 ,0.001
Physical restraint 49 (18.9) 21 (14.8) 28 (23.7) 0 (0) ,0.001 ,0.001 ,0.001
Physical illness
Surgery 118 (45.4) 0 118 (100) 13 (16.9)
Mechanical ventilation 34 (13.1) 20 (14.1) 14 (11.9) 1 (1.3) 0.003 0.002 0.007
Infection 122 (46.9) 83 (58.5) 39 (33.1) 18 (23.4) ,0.001 ,0.001 0.147
Immobility 92 (35.4) 48 (33.8) 44 (37.3) 8 (10.4) ,0.001 ,0.001 ,0.001
Medication history
Antipsychotic drug use 102 (39.2) 50 (35.2) 52 (44.1) 6 (7.8) ,0.001 ,0.001 ,0.001
Anticholinergic drug use 26 (10.0) 9 (6.3) 17 (14.4) 4 (5.2) 0.193 0.732 0.043
Anticonvulsant use 24 (9.2) 11 (7.8) 13 (11.0) 5 (6.5) 0.452 0.734 0.286
Opioid use 126 (48.5) 59 (41.6) 67 (56.8) 33 (42.9) 0.387 0.851 0.057
Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.

Table 4 Multiple logistic regression of risk factors for delirium


Risk factors Total delirium vs control Medical subgroup vs control Surgical subgroup vs control
OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value
Past medical history
Past delirium history 2.90 0.90–11.97 0.142 3.68 0.62–21.70 0.150 7.47 0.87–63.87 0.066
Past history of stroke 8.98 0.48–168.04 0.142 3.19 0.08–121.62 0.533 1,817.71* 5.37–614,920.5 0.012
Past history of falls – – – 0.98 0.14–6.99 0.981 – – –
Treatment environment
ICU care 1.82 0.56–5.92 0.321 – – – 17.95* 1.96–164.55 0.011
Hypertension 2.86* 1.21–6.72 0.016 2.91* 1.12–7.55 0.028 5.90* 1.39–25.09 0.016
Mechanical ventilation 12.49* 1.13–138.00 0.039 10.04 0.97–104.21 0.053 6.80 0.29–157.28 0.232
Infection 2.01 0.87–4.63 0.103 2.49 0.98–6.33 0.055 – – –
Immobility 2.61 0.90–7.55 0.077 2.92 0.88–9.71 0.080 2.12 0.40–11.15 0.375
Physical illness
ADL score 0.86 0.52–1.42 0.554 0.67 0.37–1.18 0.165 0.79 0.39–1.61 0.518
BUN 1.00 0.97–1.03 0.997 1.01 0.98–1.04 0.561 1.00 0.94–1.05 0.855
CR 1.15 0.813–1.64 0.422 1.13 0.80–1.61 0.479 0.92 0.53–1.61 0.782
Albumin 0.55* 0.32–0.94 0.028 0.63 0.33–1.21 0.165 0.37* 0.16–0.87 0.022
Sodium – – – 0.90* 0.83–0.98 0.010 – – –
Medication history
Number of medications 1.06 0.99–1.15 0.1 – – – 1.09* 1.00–1.18 0.050
Antipsychotic drug use 4.07* 1.41–11.72 0.009 2.38 0.73–7.81 0.151 14.57* 2.93–72.37 0.001
Anticholinergic drug use – – – – – – 14.50* 1.57–134.14 0.018
Opioid use – – – – – – 6.10* 1.58–23.44 0.009
Note: *P,0.05.
Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CI, confidence interval; CR, creatinine; ICU, intensive care unit; OR, odds ratio.

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com


1791
Dovepress
Kim et al Dovepress

most common delirium subtype.35 This discrepancy may be occurrence of delirium because of the cross-sectional study
due to the fact that hypoactive delirium is difficult for medical design. However, this limitation was minimized by the fact
staff to identify and is easily missed. The natural course of that we collected the risk factor information prior to the onset
delirium fluctuates, and assessment is often made when the of delirium. Second, the etiology of delirium is multifactorial
symptoms have become aggravated, leading to a determina- and has not been completely clarified. In addition to the risk
tion of hyperactive delirium. According to a recent study,36 factors included in this study, there might be unidentified or
one of the major reasons that nurses fail to detect delirium inconsistently reported risk factors that were not included.
is that the natural course of delirium changes. Because we Because we could not process the information about medica-
included patients who had been referred to psychiatrists, there tion use appropriately, the effect of medication history on the
was a greater chance of including patients whose behavioral development of delirium might have been underestimated.
problems were relatively severe and easily noticeable. Third, the control group and the delirium group were not
In order to identify the risk factors in two major clinical precisely matched. There were differences in physical illness
situations, we categorized the delirium group into medical and major procedures such as surgery under anesthesia. It
and surgical subgroups. Lower albumin level, hypertension, was difficult to enroll matched controls who had no psychi-
mechanical ventilation, and use of antipsychotic drugs were atric problems and, accordingly, to obtain information from
identified as risk factors in the delirium group. Among these psychiatric assessments for them. To reduce the effect of the
factors, lower albumin level, hypertension, and use of antip- control group differences, however, we excluded certain risk
sychotic drugs are modifiable through proper medical care, factors. For example, we excluded the use of benzodiazepines
and it might be important to correct these risk factors aggres- in the analysis as we were certain that the control group had
sively to prevent and/or manage delirium. A recent meta- a higher rate of use. Nevertheless, the results should be cau-
analysis determined that the risk of delirium can be lowered tiously interpreted. Fourth, because the number of patients
in surgical inpatients by the preventive use of antipsychotic involved in our study is limited, it is difficult to extrapolate the
drugs.37 However, the use of antipsychotic drugs did not have results to the general population. Moreover, some risk factors
a significant effect on the duration of delirium, the severity (mechanical ventilation and past history of stroke) showed
of symptoms, or the length of hospital stay.37 In contrast, wide CI of the ORs. It may be due to the small number of
another study reported that the use of antipsychotic drugs in patients who had risk factors. The results with wide CI should
ICU patients without a specific diagnosis might increase the be cautiously interpreted because these results may lose their
duration of hospital stay and mortality.38 Clearly, the effect of statistical significance in other studies.
antipsychotic drugs on delirium requires further research. We attempted to overcome the limitations of previous
When we identified the risk factors for delirium in the studies by including various risk factors of delirium. We were
two subgroups, there were some differences. While the risk able to identify significant risk factors under general clinical
factors in the medical subgroup were lower plasma sodium situations, ie, the study was not limited to one specific clinical
level and hypertension, the risk factors in the surgical subgroup setting. Furthermore, we investigated both the delirium group
were lower plasma albumin level, past history of stroke, ICU and the control group for the same risk factors. The use of the
care, hypertension, number of medications, and the use of control group for the analysis is one strength of our study.
antipsychotic drugs, anticholinergic drugs, and opioids. The
fact that the two subgroups showed different results suggests Disclosure
that different risk factors should be considered in each clinical The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
situation. For nonsurgical patients, it might be important to
control electrolyte imbalance. For surgical patients, surgery References
is a known risk factor for delirium, and delirium is believed 1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric
to be associated with preoperative and postoperative stroke Association; 2013.
in patients with risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.39–42 2. Bucht G, Gustafson Y, Sandberg O. Epidemiology of delirium. Dement
Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;10(5):315–318.
Furthermore, postoperative surgical patients are often treated in
3. de Lange E, Verhaak PF, van der Meer K. Prevalence, presentation and
the ICU, which itself is a risk factor for delirium. Thus, stroke prognosis of delirium in older people in the population, at home and in
prevention should be a priority in surgical management. long term care: a review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28(2):127–134.
4. Tsai MC, Weng HH, Chou SY, Tsai CS, Hung TH, Su JA. Three-year
This study had several limitations of note. First, we could mortality of delirium among elderly inpatients in consultation-liaison
not clarify the temporal relation between risk factors and the service. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012;34(1):66–71.

1792 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12
Dovepress
Dovepress Determination of risk factors for delirium

5. Miu DK, Yeung JC. Incidence of post-stroke delirium and 1-year out- 25. de Castro SM, Ünlü Ç, Tuynman JB, et al. Incidence and risk factors of
come. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(1):123–129. delirium in the elderly general surgical patient. Am J Surg. 2014;208(1):
6. Wolters AE, van Dijk D, Pasma W, et al. Long-term outcome of 26–32.
delirium during intensive care unit stay in survivors of critical illness: 26. Gallagher TK, McErlean S, O’Farrell A, et al. Incidence and risk factors
a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):R125. of delirium in patients post pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford).
7. Dasgupta M, Brymer C. Prognosis of delirium in hospitalized elderly: 2014;16(9):864–869.
worse than we thought. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29(5):497–505. 27. Krzych LJ, Wybraniec MT, Krupka-Matuszczyk I, et al. Complex
8. Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, Quach L, et al. Cognitive trajectories assessment of the incidence and risk factors of delirium in a large cohort
after postoperative delirium. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(1):30–39. of cardiac surgery patients: a single-center 6-year experience. Biomed
9. Friedman JI, Soleimani L, McGonigle DP, Egol C, Silverstein JH. Pharma- Res Int. 2013;2013:835850.
cological treatments of non-substance-withdrawal delirium: a systematic 28. Shadvar K, Baastani F, Mahmoodpoor A, Bilehjani E. Evaluation of
review of prospective trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(2):151–159. the prevalence and risk factors of delirium in cardiac surgery ICU.
10. Fortini A, Morettini A, Tavernese G, Facchini S, Tofani L, Pazzi M. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2013;5(4):157–161.
Delirium in elderly patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards. 29. Serafim RB, Dutra MF, Saddy F, et al. Delirium in postoperative
Intern Emerg Med. 2014;9(4):435–441. nonventilated intensive care patients: risk factors and outcomes. Ann
11. Nagase M, Okamoto Y, Tsuneto S, et al. A retrospective chart review Intensive Care. 2012;2(1):51.
of terminal patients with cancer with agitation and their risk factors. 30. Lee HJ, Hwang DS, Wang SK, Chee IS, Baeg S, Kim JL. Early
J Palliat Med. 2012;15(11):1185–1190. assessment of delirium in elderly patients after hip surgery. Psychiatry
12. Pol RA, van Leeuwen BL, Izaks GJ, et al. C-reactive protein predicts Investig. 2011;8(4):340–347.
postoperative delirium following vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014; 31. Lin Y, Chen J, Wang Z. Meta-analysis of factors which influence delir-
28(8):1923–1930. ium following cardiac surgery. J Card Surg. 2012;27(4):481–492.
13. Ritchie CW, Newman TH, Leurent B, Sampson EL. The association 32. Huai J, Ye X. A meta-analysis of critically ill patients reveals several
between C-reactive protein and delirium in 710 acute elderly hospital potential risk factors for delirium. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36(5):
admissions. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(5):717–724. 488–496.
14. Aldemir M, Ozen S, Kara IH, Sir A, Baç B. Predisposing factors for delir- 33. van Munster BC, de Rooij SE. Delirium: a synthesis of current knowl-
ium in the surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2001;5(5):265–270. edge. Clin Med. 2014;14(2):192–195.
15. Rothberg MB, Herzig SJ, Pekow PS, Avrunin J, Lagu T, Lindenauer PK. 34. Inouye SK. Delirium in older persons. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(11):
Association between sedating medications and delirium in older 1157–1165.
inpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(6):923–930. 35. Liptzin B, Levkoff SE. An empirical study of delirium subtypes.
16. Tse L, Schwarz SK, Bowering JB, et al. Pharmacological risk factors for Br J Psychiatry. 1992;161:843–845.
delirium after cardiac surgery: a review. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2012; 36. El Hussein M, Hirst S, Salyers V. Factors that contribute to under-
10(3):181–196. recognition of delirium by registered nurses in acute care settings:
17. Shi Q, Presutti R, Selchen D, Saposnik G. Delirium in acute stroke: a scoping review of the literature to explain this phenomenon. J Clin Nurs.
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2012;43(3):645–649. 2015;24(7–8):906–915.
18. Nakase-Thompson R, Sherer M, Yablon SA, Nick TG, Trzepacz PT. 37. Gilmore ML, Wolfe DJ. Antipsychotic prophylaxis in surgical patients
Acute confusion following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2004;18(2): modestly decreases delirium incidence – but not duration – in high-
131–142. incidence samples: a meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(4):
19. Xue P, Wu Z, Wang K, Tu C, Wang X. Incidence and risk factors of post- 370–375.
operative delirium in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection 38. Swan JT, Fitousis K, Hall JB, Todd SR, Turner KL. Antipsychotic use
of prostate: a prospective cohort study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016; and diagnosis of delirium in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2012;
12:137–142. 16(3):R84.
20. Sevuk U, Baysal E, Ay N, et al. Relationship between cobalamin 39. Wong GY, Warner DO, Schroeder DR, et al. Risk of surgery and
deficiency and delirium in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. anesthesia for ischemic stroke. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(2):425–432.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:2033–2039. 40. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Borger MA, et al. Stroke after cardiac surgery:
21. Van Rompaey B, Elseviers MM, Schuurmans MJ, Shortridge-Baggett LM, a risk factor analysis of 16,184 consecutive adult patients. Ann Thorac
Truijen S, Bossaert L. Risk factors for delirium in intensive care patients: Surg. 2003;75(2):472–478.
a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R77. 41. Whitlock R, Healey JS, Connolly SJ, et al. Predictors of early and late
22. Leite MA, Osaku EF, Costa CR, et al. Delirium during weaning from stroke following cardiac surgery. CMAJ. 2014;186(12):905–911.
mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Res Pract. 2014;2014:546349. 42. Brooks DC, Schindler JL. Perioperative stroke: risk assessment, pre-
23. Ahmed S, Leurent B, Sampson EL. Risk factors for incident delirium vention and treatment. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2014;
among older people in acute hospital medical units: a systematic review 16(2):282.
and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2014;43(3):326–333.
24. Kanbayashi Y, Hatano Y, Hata Y, Morita T, Fukui K, Hosokawa T.
Predictive factors for agitation severity of hyperactive delirium in ter-
minally ill cancer patients in a general hospital using ordered logistic
regression analysis. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(9):1020–1025.

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress


Publish your work in this journal
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment is an international, peer- and is the official journal of The International Neuropsychiatric
reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing ­Association (INA). The manuscript management system is completely
on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which
range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. This journal is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to
is indexed on PubMed Central, the ‘PsycINFO’ database and CAS, read real quotes from published authors.
Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/neuropsychiatric-disease-and-treatment-journal

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com


1793
Dovepress

You might also like