Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Although progress on biofilm research has been obtained during the past decades, the treatment of biofilm
infections with antibiotics remains a riddle. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles
of an antimicrobial agent provide important information helping to establish an efficient dosing regimen
and to minimize the development of antimicrobial tolerance and resistance in biofilm infections.
Unfortunately, most previous PK/PD studies of antibiotics have been done on planktonic cells, and extra-
polation of the results on biofilms is problematic as bacterial biofilms differ from planktonic grown cells in
the growth rate, gene expression, and metabolism. Here, we set up several protocols for the studies of PK/
PD of antibiotics in biofilm infections of P. aeruginosa in vitro and in vivo. It should be underlined that
none of the protocols in biofilms have yet been certificated for clinical use or proved useful for guidance of
antibiotic therapy.
1 Introduction
Gianfranco Donelli (ed.), Microbial Biofilms: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1147,
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0467-9_17, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
239
240 Wang Hengzhuang et al.
2 Materials
2.1 Bacterial Strains P. aeruginosa PAO1 and other strains with or without fluores-
cent tag.
2.3 Preparation for 1. Microtiter plate: Flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plate and pegs
Biofilm Susceptibility of a modified polystyrene microtiter lid (Nunc A/S, Denmark).
Assay and Kinetic 2. 0.1 % crystal violet solution.
Assay of Antibiotics
3. Ultrasonic cleaner: Bransonic 220.
on Biofilms
4. Microtiter plate reader.
2.4 Preparation for 1. Animal: 10-week-old female NMRI mice (Taconic, Denmark)
PK/PD of Antibiotics weighing 32–34 g.
on Biofilms In Vivo 2. Cyclophosphamide.
3. NucleoCassette Device (NucleoCounter System, ChemoMetec
A/S, Denmark).
4. Microisolation cage system.
5. Fentanyl and Fluanisone (Hypnorm, 10 mg/ml).
6. Midazolam (Dormicum, 5 mg/ml).
7. Trizma base.
8. Calcium chloride dihydrate.
9. Pronova.
10. SYTO 9.
11. Streptococcus SP. EB68.
12. Bordetella bronchiseptica ATCC4617.
242 Wang Hengzhuang et al.
3 Methods
Fig. 2 The biofilm formation on wells (a) and peg lid of microplate (b) are stained by crystal violet. Artificial
biofilm of alginate beads is shown (c) under microscopy (×60)
PK/PD of Antibiotics in Biofilm Infections 243
Fig. 3 Three steps of biofilm susceptibility assay including biofilm growth, single or combination antimicrobial
challenge, and biofilm recovery. OD650 value is applied to evaluate the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration
(MBIC) and minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC)
3.1.3 Kinetics 1. Biofilm cultivation and rinse are described as above for young
of Antibiotics on Biofilm biofilm and mature biofilm.
Assay In Vitro (Figs. 3 2. Peg lids are placed into flat-bottom microtiter plates contain-
and 4) ing different concentrations of antibiotics in 0.12 ml of ABTG
medium per well (antibiotic challenge plate) and incubated
for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h at 37 °C with shaking
(see Notes 2 and 6).
3. After antibiotic incubation, peg lids are rinsed three times and
placed into antibiotic-free LB in a biofilm recovery plate with
sonication (see Notes 3 and 7).
4. OD650 is measured by a microtiter plate reader before and after
incubation at 37 °C for 8–12 h to set up the dynamic time–kill
curve of antibiotics (see Note 5).
244 Wang Hengzhuang et al.
a 0.8
0.4
0.2
0
0 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 24
Time (hours)
b 0.8
0.6
OD650 value
0.4
0.2
0
0 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 24
Time (hours)
Fig. 4 Kill curves of biofilm-growing P. aeruginosa non-mucoid PAO1 with colistin (a) and imipenem (b) in vitro.
Kinetics of colistin and imipenem in vitro showed concentration-dependent and time-dependent killing,
respectively, on biofilm-growing P. aeruginosa (reprinted from [11] with permission)
3.2 PK/PD 10-week-old female NMRI mice are used (see Note 8).
of Antibiotics The mice are maintained on standard mouse chow and water
on Biofilms In Vivo ad libitum for 1 week before challenge. All animal experiments are
performed under authorization from the National Animal Ethics
3.2.1 Animals
Committee of Denmark.
3.2.2 Neutropenic Mouse 1. Mice are rendered neutropenic by injecting three doses of cyclo-
Model of Biofilm Lung or phosphamide intraperitoneally on day 1 (150 mg/kg of body
Thigh Infection weight), day 3 (100 mg/kg), and day 4 (100 mg/kg) prior to
PK/PD of Antibiotics in Biofilm Infections 245
Fig. 6 Different concentrations of alginate bead staining by SYTO 9. The inoculum size is controlled precisely
in the alginate beads from 105 to 108 CFU/ml
Fig. 7 Biofilm lung infection model. Biofilm cells are injected into lower left lung by trachea route when
mouse is lightly anesthetized and receive a micro-operation with tracheotomy. Antibiotic administrations
are included with intravenous (IV), intraperitoneal (IP), intramuscular (IM), intratracheal (IT), and oral
administration. And then samples of lung are collected for the study of bacteriology, pathology, and
immunology
PK/PD of Antibiotics in Biofilm Infections 247
150
12
MBIC of young biofilm 8µg/ml
8 MBC 8µg/ml
4
MIC 2µg/ml
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time (min)
Concentrations of imipenem in serum (µg/ml)
80
60
40
MBIC of mature biofilm 32µg/ml
20 MBIC of young biofilm 8µg/ml
MBC 4µg/ml
0 MIC 1µg/ml
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time (min)
Fig. 8 Pharmacokinetics in mouse serum of colistin versus MIC, MBC, MBIC, and MBEC of P. aeruginosa PAO1
(black square) 16 mg/kg of colistin and (black circle) 64 mg/kg of imipenem with one-dose intraperitoneal
administration. The concentrations of colistin and imipenem required to eradicate the biofilms in vivo are
higher than the maximum concentration (Cmax) of the drug in serum. It is difficult to reach the target of MBEC
in serum when the drug is administrated systemically, but the target of MBIC is possible to be achieved in
serum. Early treatment of antibiotics and its combinations in young biofilm are highly recommended in biofilm
infections (reprinted from [11] with permission)
Fig. 9 Serum concentrations (conc.) of colistin (a) and imipenem (b) in mice after
intraperitoneal treatment with doses from 8 to 256 mg/kg are shown. The y-axis
in both panels is log 10. The MICs against P. aeruginosa PAO1 are 4 mg/l for
colistin and 1 mg/l for imipenem (reprinted from [9] with permission)
4 Notes
Fig. 10 (continued) Color bars denote the interval that serum levels of antibiotic
concentrations exceeded the MIC (T > MIC). (a) Colistin versus planktonic bacte-
ria; (b) colistin versus biofilms; (c) imipenem versus planktonic bacteria;
(d) imipenem versus biofilms. Kinetics of colistin and imipenem in vivo showed
concentration-dependent and time-dependent killing, respectively, on biofilm-
growing P. aeruginosa. Comparing to planktonic cells, both higher concentrations
and longer period treatment with antibiotics are required to kill biofilm cells in vivo
(reprinted from [9] with permission)
252 Wang Hengzhuang et al.
a 10
9 R2 = 0.8459 (biofilm ¡)
8
Log10CFU / Lung
7
6
5
4
3 R2 = 0.7692 (planktonic *)
2
1
100 1000 10000 100000
AUC / MIC of colistin
b 10
9 R2 = 0.2413 (biofilm ¡)
8
Log10CFU / Lung
7
6
5
4
3
R2 = 0.2477 (planktonic *)
2
1
0 20 40 60 80
Cmax / MIC of colistin
c 10
9 R2 = 0.4465 (biofilm ¡)
Log10CFU / Lung
8
7
6
5
4
3 R2 = 0.4917 (planktonic *)
2
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
T >MIC of colistin
Fig. 11 Relationships for P. aeruginosa between the log 10 numbers of CFU per
lung and PK/PD indices AUC/MIC, Cmax/MIC, and T > MIC of colistin (a, b, c) and Fig.
11 (continued) imipenem (d, e, f). Each symbol represents the data from a single
lung. The horizontal dotted lines represent the mean bacterial burden in the lungs
at the start of treatment. AUC/MIC (AUC/MBIC) is the best correlated parameter for
colistin to describe the elimination of planktonic (biofilms) bacteria in the lung
infection and T > MIC (T > MBIC) for imipenem (reprinted from [9] with permission)
d 10
9
R2 = 0.9807 (biofilm ¡)
8
Log10CFU / Lung
R2 = 0.9837 (planktonic *)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
100 1000 10000 100000
AUC / MIC of imipenem
e 10
9
8
R2 = 0.7845 (biofilm ¡)
Log10CFU / Lung
7
R2 = 0.7447 (planktonic *)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 20 40 60 80 100
Cmax / MIC of imipenem
f 10
9
8 R2 = 0.9757 (biofilm ¡)
Log10CFU / Lung
7 R2 = 0.9438 (planktonic *)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 5 10 15 20
T >MIC of imipenem
Fig. 11 (continued)
References