Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Female Sexual Response and The Timing of Partner o
Female Sexual Response and The Timing of Partner o
To cite this article: Carol Anderson Darling , J. Kenneth Davidson & Ruth P. Cox (1991) Female Sexual
Response and the Timing of Partner Orgasm, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 17:1, 3-21, DOI:
10.1080/00926239108405464
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or
howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising
out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
Female Sexual Response and
the Timing of Partier Orgasm
CAROL ANDERSON DARLING,
J . KENNETH DAVIDSON, Sr., and R U T H P. COX
Carol Anderson Darling, Ph.D., is Professor o f Family and Child Sciences, Department of Family.
Child, and Consumer Sciences, T h e Florida State University, Tallahassee, F1. 32306. J. Kenneth
Davidson, Sr., Ph.D.. is Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Uni-
versity of Wisronsin, Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54702. Ruth P. Cox, Ph.D., R.N., Marriage arid
Family Therapy, Department of Family, Child, and Consumer Sciences, T h e Florida State University,
Tallahassee, FL 32306.
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the
Scientific Study of Sex. Toronto, Canada, in November 1989. T h e investigators wish to ackr~owledge
t w o grants from the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Grants-in-Aid of Research Prograni which
have partially provided the resources for data collection, coding, and analyses. T h e authors also wish
to thank Barbara L. Finstad, Sue Hulberg, Wendy L. 'I'ischendorf, and Katherine Treunsfels.
Research Assistants, University of Wisconsin-Eau <;laire for their many contributions t o this research
project. In addition. appreciation is herein expressed for support from the Aradenrir Coniputing
Services Center for data analyses and for the tables produced by the Media Development Center
with support from the School of Graduate Studies and Office of University Research. University ol'
Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, Vol. 17, No. 1, Spring 1991 0 BrunnedMazel, Inc.
3
‘1 Journal of Sex U Marital Therapy, Val. 1 7 , N o . I , Spring 1991
erence for many women. In fact, researchers have suggested that orgasms
achieved with a partner present are characterized by greater physiological
satisfaction, more intimacy, and deeper pelvic feelings. Furthermore,
many women still prefer vaginally induced orgasms, not only because t h e
physical pleasure is greater either in intensity or in frequency of orgasmic
response, but also because of greater emotional meaning for the partner-
related sexual activity.* ‘Therefore, t h e partner-relationship context
within which one experiences orgasm and the physiological influence of
this environment have a substantial impact o n how physiological aspects
of orgasm are perceived by women.’
Although various factors have been investigated regarding the dimen-
sions of women’s physiological and psychological sexual responses, there
are virtually n o studies o n the relationship of women’s sexual response
Downloaded by [Marshall University] at 05:53 13 August 2013
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Sample
separated; and 1.7% widowed. The respondents also ranged in age from
20 to 63 years, with 68.2% being between ages 20 and 35.
Statistical Analysis
decimal places using 0.5 or greater as the basis for rounding the values
upward.
FINDINGS
In order to inore fully examine the timing of the male partner orgasm
in conjunction with female orgasm, a question regarding the timing of
the male partner’s orgasm was utilized. As a result, the respondents were
categorized into three groups: Before, those women who experienced
their first orgasm before their male partner (40.1%; n = 322); Simulkz-
neous, those women who experienced their first orgasm at about the same
time as their male partner (16.8% n = 135); and After, those women who
experienced their first orgasm after their male partner (3 1.4%;n = 252).
An examination of the background information on the respondents
indicated that the age at which they first experienced orgasm ranged
from 3 to 40 years with the majority (89.9%) clustered between 10 and
26 years. T h e mean ages for experiencing first orgasm for each group
were 16.1 years for the Before group, 17.4 years for the Simultaneous
group, and 17.3 years for the After group [F (2, 687) = 3.97; d.6 =
2,687; p < .019]. While there is little difference between the mean ages
for the After and Simultaneous groups, the Before group began to ex-
perience orgasm approximately one year earlier than the other two
groups.
In determining how often an orgasm was experienced during sexual
intercourse, the responses for the total group ranged from always
( 1 1.3%),almost always (54.6%), sometimes (17.7%), rarely (9.3%), to
never (7.2%).When examining the always and almost always categories,
these combined responses were indicated by 79.3%of the Before group,
85.0% of the Simultaneous group, and 37.6%of the After group. There
was a significant difference among the three groups regarding overall
frequency [x2(8, n = 709) = 152.29; p < .OOO].
10 .lournal of Sex Manta1 Therapy, Vol. 17, No. I. Spnn,g 1991
'TABLE 1
Partner-Related Techniques of Experiencing Orgasm
by 'Timing of Partner Orgasm
I lining of I'artncr Orgatm
Total'
1 echnqiie\ Before Simultaneous After Gioup (;roiip?
(71 = 322) 01 - 115) ( n = 252) (n = 709) Diffeienrc
% % 9 lo X2 P
Manual Srimulationl(:liroraI
Area with Scxual Intercourse R8.4 n9.6 74.9 84.0 22.18 .000*
Cliliiial Area and Vaginal Area 89.0 80.6 69.4 80. 7 33.56 .OI)O*
hliinual Stimirlation/Cliroi-al
.Are;i W/O Sexual Intercourse 84.3 70.9 69.8 76.7 19.22 .noo*
Sexual Iiitel.ioiirseiVaginal
Penetration Only 6R.3 74.6 59.6 6G.G 9.52 .009*
Sexual Inter~ourselVagiiial
PerirrralioiiiFeinalc A k v e 6R.7 71.6 55.7 61.8 13.28 .oo I *
Sexual Iiitercoiirse/VaginaI
PenetrationiSide Position 49.5 50.7 30.2 43.2 24.48 .ooo*
Oral StiinulationiNipples 35.4 37.3 26.8 32.8 (LO6 .04x*
Anal Inrerc.i,tirsei(:litoi.al
Stimulation 16.3 11.9 11.1 13.7 3.57 .I69
L'sc of Object O t h e r T h a n
\'ibrator for \"agin;il
I'enetratioii 7.3 7.5 5. I 6.7 1.43 .4!)0
% ?T ?& z X' P
Preoccupation WINonsexual
Thoughts 41.0 46.6 46.9 45.5 ..
3i ,769
I x k o f Adequate Vaginal
Lubrication 22.8 24.1 21.6 23.7 25 .882
l a c k of Tenderness bv Partner 19.9 18.8 29.4 22.7 7.92 .019*
Lack of Privacy for Introniission 20.5 22.6 18.5 20.3 .86 ,650
For these three groups, what is the comparative timing related to the
length in minutes for foreplay, sexual intercourse, and orgasm? Differ-
ences among the three groups for mean time before orgasm for both
partners were identified (see Table 3). T h e data indicated that women
in the After group had partners who experienced orgasm o n an average
of 1.2 minutes before themselves. In comparison, the male partners in
the Simultaneous group experienced orgasm on an average of 2.7 min-
utes after their partners, while the male partners of the Before group
respondents experienced orgasm on an average of 7.3 minutes after their
female partners. Although for women, all three groups preferred a
-1’ABLE3
Time 1,ength by Minutes for Select Behavior Variables
by Timing of Partner Orgasm
‘l’iniingo f Partner Orgasm
Total
l ’ i n i e Length by Minuted Before Simultaneous After Group Group
Behavior Variable (n = 322) (n = 135) (n = 25’2) (11 = 709) Difference
M M M M X? P
Mean Time Before M’oman/Orgasm/
Sexual Intercourse 6.6 li.8 9.6 7.6’ 12.78 .000*
TABLE 4
Reasons Women Prefer to Masturbate Instead of
Engaging in Sexual Intercourse by Timing o f Partner Orgasm
'Timing of Partner Orgasm
Total I
Keasons/Wr)nien Preler Hefore Simultaneous Alter Group Croup'
to Mastiirba~e (n = 169) (11 = 52) ( n = 128) (n = 319) Diffcrence
'7r % %, %. X' P
Preferred Sex Partner Not Available 76.3 69.2 58.6 68.8 10.68 .004*
I nterc~iirse
Angry with Partner 15 1 I I .5 14.8 14.6 :I8 ,787
Parrricr Igirures Clitoris 11.2 7.7 21.9 14.6 8.94 .01 I *
Par [lie r k-ccliiig 1II 16.6 13.5 9.4 13.5 3.29 .ID9
Sexual Satisfaction
TABLE 5
Sexual Satisfaction by Timing of Partner Orgasm
Timing of Partner Orgasm
~~~ ~~
Sex~ralSalts/urlronlA/kr Orgum
Physiological Sexual Satisfaction'
Intense Satisfaction 59.9 50.0 43.4 54.4
A Lot of Satisliction 91.9 36.6 42.0 36. I
Fair Amount of Satisfaction 6.9 4.5 10.2 7.5
Downloaded by [Marshall University] at 05:53 13 August 2013
Spximl SatirjnctionlOverall
Physiological Sexual Satisfaction'
Very Satisfied 40.5 40.6 16.0 31.8
Satisfied 46. I 38.3 42.8 43.5
Somewhat Satisfied 9.0 13.5 26.0 15.9
Somewhat Dissatisfied 3. I 4.5 8.8 5.4
Dissatisfied 0.9 I .5 5.2 2.6
Very Dissatisfied 1.3 1.5 1.2 0.9
partner issues, only the partner-related changes in sex life are noted in
Table 6. When examining the rank-ordered responses for the total group,
the three most often desired changes were more foreplay, more frequent
intercourse, and a more romantic approach prior to starting sexual in-
tercourse. More After group respondents reported the desire for more
foreplay and more romantic approach than the Simultaneous and Before
groups. For a vast majority of the desired changes, there were a number
of significant differences among the groups, with the respondents in the
16 .lournal of Sex E3 Marital Therapy, Vol. 17, No. 1 , Spring I991
TABLE 6
Desired Partner-Related Changes in Sex Life by Timing of Partner
Orgasm
1 irninR of Partner Orgasm
'l'oldl I
Desired Changed Before Siinultaneous After Group Group'
Sex Life (11 = 322) ( n = 135) (n = 252) (n = 709) Difference
% % % O/F X2 P
M o r e Foreplay 35.2 32.1 60.3 13.1 844.55 .non*
More Frcqucnt Intercourse 35.5 36.6 44.5 38.9 5.16 ,076
More Kcmiantic Approatli Prior/
Downloaded by [Marshall University] at 05:53 13 August 2013
After group more frequently desiring changes. While some changes in-
volved emotional issues such as a more romantic approach, more ten-
derness, more communication, and sexual intercourse with mutual love
between partners; others focused on physiologicavaction-oriented changes,
some of which included more frequent orgasms, more time before eja-
culation, more manual stimulation of the clitoral area, and more oral
stimulation of nipples. Thus, it appears that those women whose male
partners experience orgasm before they do, are not only experiencing
reduced sexual satisfaction, but also desire a number of changes in their
sexual lives.
DISCUSSION
Downloaded by [Marshall University] at 05:53 13 August 2013
sexual intercourse. Although all three groups desired more foreplay, this
desired change was especially the case for the women in the After group.
T h e r e may be circumstances, such as unavailability of a partner a n d
n o opportunity for sexual intercourse, when the female partner cannot
reach orgasm with a partner and therefore chooses to utilize masturbation
to experience an orgasm. Although it was more likely that women in the
Before group became involved in masturbation because their partners
were not available, the After group was more likely to use masturbation
d u e to timing factors, lack of clitoral stimulation, and lack of orgasm
during sexual intercourse. While masturbation is a positive a n d normative
sexual behavior, the reasons for masturbation reported more frequently
by the After group indicated their greater frustration related to this
sexual behavior option.
Downloaded by [Marshall University] at 05:53 13 August 2013
is diminished for the woman. Therefore, this finding indicates the im-
portance of partner communication, which can alleviate the concerns the
couple is experiencing.
From the findings in this study, it is clear that relevant issues exist for
sex therapists and educators regarding questions of sexual adjustment,
the understanding of sexual and orgasmic behaviors, and sexual satis-
faction. Issues that might be assessed by a therapist concern timing of
orgasm, techniques of obtaining orgasm, awareness of and guilt associated
with pretending orgasm, and their impact on the interpersonal dynamics
of the relationship. Factors that inhibit orgasm can also be determined
along with their connected relationship to sexual ati is faction.^^.^^ Com-
munication concerning these issues between the partners is of prime
importance in order to facilitate making the desired changes in the sexual
Downloaded by [Marshall University] at 05:53 13 August 2013
such as marriage and family therapists, as well as sex therapists who deal
with individuals or couples, should be more aware of all the factors that
affect the sexual relationship, especially those that relate to the timing
of orgasm. By exploring all of these facets of the sexual experience in
relation to other aspects of the interpersonal experience, a broader base
of assessment can lead to a better understanding of relational dynamics
and sexual satisfaction.
REFERENCES
I . Newcorrib MD. Bentler PM: Dimensions of subjective female orgasmic responsiveness.
J P u s Social Psyc 44:862-873, 1983.
2. Davidson, J K Sr, Darling CA: Perceived differences in the female orgasmic response:
New meanings for sexual satisfaction. Fam Pract Hes J 8:75-84, 1989.
Downloaded by [Marshall University] at 05:53 13 August 2013
3. McCary J H , McCary SP: McCary’s human sexualiq (9th ed). Belmont, C A , Wadsworth,
1982.
4. Masters W H , Johnson VE, Kolodny RC: Human sexuality (3rd ed). Glenview, 11.. Scott,
Foresman, 1988.
5. Kaplan, HS: How to ouercome premature ejaculation. New York, BrunnerIMazel, 1989.
6. Allgeier AR, Allgeier ER: Sexual interactions. Lexington, MA, Heath, 1988.
7. Crooks R, Baur K: Oursexuality. Redwood City. CA, BenjaminICummings. 1990.
8. Kinsey, AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE, Gebhard PH: Sexual behavior in the humun
femalr. New York, Simon & Schuster, 1953.
9. Crenshaw TL.: Redtide manners: Your guide to better sex. New York, Pinnacle Books,
1983.
10. Jobes PG: T h e relationship between traditional a n d innovative sex-role adaptations
a n d sexual satisfaction a m o n g a homogeneous sample of middle-aged Caucasian
w 0 m e n . j Sex Marital T h o 12:146-156;, 1986.
I 1. Kaplan HS: The illustrated manual of sex therapy. New York, BrunnerIMazel, 1987.
12. Klassen AD, Wilsnack SC: Sexual experience a n d drinking a m o n g women in a U.S.
national survey. Arch Sex Behuu 15:363-392, 1986.
13. Loos VE, Bridges CF, Critelli JW: Weiner’s attribution theory a n d female orgasmic
consistency.J Sex Res 23:348-361, 1987.
14. Blumstein P, Schwartz P: Ammcan couples: Money, work, sex. New York. Morrow, 1983.
15. Oziel LJ: Inconsistency of coital orgasm in women. Med Aspects H u m Sex 1l(9):16428,
1978.
16. Gospodirioff ER: Bodily contact a n d sexual response in adult females (Doctoral dis-
sertation, University of Pennsylvania. 1979). DrS Abst lntl40:3367B, 1980. (University
Microfilm No. 7928 133.)
17. Fisher S: Thefemale orgasm.New York, Basic Books, 1973.
18. Snyder, DK, Berg, P: Determinants of sexual dissatisfaction in sexually distressed
couples. Arch Sex Behav 12:237-246, 1983.
19. Denny N W , Field J K , Q u a d a g n o D: Sex differences in sexual needs a n d desires. Arch
Sex Behnv 13:233-245, 1984.
20. Wells C , L.ucas MJ, Meyer J K : Unrealistic expectations of orgasm. Med Aspecls Hum
Sex 14(4):59-7 1, 1980.
21. Roberts CR: Depth of involvement, imagery, a n d daydreaming: A study of altered
states of consciousness a n d orgasmic success in women. (Doctoral dissertation, Cal-
ifornia School of Professional Psychology, Fresno, 1982). Dis Abst lntl44:597B, 1983.
(University Microfilm No. DA8315530.)
22. Simkins L., Shotts D, Cardea. A: Communication between sexual partners. U n p u b -
lished manuscript. liniversity of Missouri, Kansas City, 1983.
Femalr S ~ x u aResponse
l and the Timing of Partner Orgasm 21
23. d e B r u i n G: From masturbation to orgasm with a partner: How some women bridge
the gap-and why others don't. J Sex Marital Ther 8:151-167, 1982.
24. Falik LA: Vaginal vs. clitoral orgasms: Anatomic and physiologic considerations. Med
Aspects Hum Sex 15(9):6546, 1981.
25. Horton DJ: Sex-role orientation. sexual behavior and sexual satisfaction in women
(Doctoral dissertation, T h e George Washington University, 1982). Dis Abst lntl
42:4932B, 1982. (University Microfilms, No. QA82 1 1767.)
26. Campbell A, Converse P, Rogers W: The gUali9 of Amm'can lfe: Perceptions, evaluations,
and satisfaction. New York. Sage, 1976.
27. 'Traupman J , Hatfield E. Wexler P: Equity and sexual satisfaction in dating couples.
BritkhJ Soc f'sy 22:33-40, 1983.
28. Carroll JL, Volk KD, Hyde JS: Differences between males and females in motives
for engaging in sexual intercourse. Arch Sex Behav 1 4 : 131-139, 1985.
29. Clifford K: Subjective sexual experience in college women. Arch SexBehm 7: 183-197,
Downloaded by [Marshall University] at 05:53 13 August 2013
1978.
30. Waterman CK, Chiauzzi EJ: T h e role of orgasm in male and female sexual enjoyment.
J Sex Res 18:146-159, 1982.
31. Gebhard PH: Factors in marital orgasm. J SOCIssues 22:88-95, 1966.
32. Lief HI: Sexual survey X36: Current thinking on the orgasm experience. Med Aspects
Hum Sex 14(7):55-62, 1980.
33. Patton D, Waring EM: Sex and marital intimacy. J Sex Marital Ther 11:176-184, 1985.
3 4 . Grosskopf D: Sex and the mam'ed woman. New York, Simon & Schuster, 1983.
35. Kaplan HS: The evaluation of sexual dkorders: Psychologzcal and medical aspects. New
York, BrunnerIMazel, 1983.
36. Kaplan HS: Comprehensive evaluation of disorders of sexual desire. Washington, DC,
American Psychiatric Press, 1985.
37. Penney A: Great sex. N e w York, Putnam, 1985.
38. Eichel E, Eichel J , Kule S: T h e techniques of coital alignment and its relation to
female orgasmic response and simultaneous orgasm. J Sex Marikd Ther 14: 129-14 1 ,
1988.