Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modern Humanities Research Association Is Collaborating With JSTOR To Digitize, Preserve and Extend Access To The Modern Language Review
Modern Humanities Research Association Is Collaborating With JSTOR To Digitize, Preserve and Extend Access To The Modern Language Review
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Modern Humanities Research Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Modern
Language Review.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 134.129.120.3 on Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:27:11 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
MLR, 89.I, '994 263
as mentioned, although he was given a whole essay in Robert Acker's and Marianne
Burkhard's Blick aufdie Schweiz(Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1987). For Swiss lyric poetry
apart from Marti one must look to contributions inJohn Flood's symposium volume
Moder SwissLiterature:UnityandDiversity(London: Wolff, 1985), where one will also
find the dramatists treated (by Michael Butler) who are absent from this volume;
even the plays of Frisch and Diirrenmatt are neglected here in favour of the narrative
works. In spite of the subtitle, the main thrust of the book is on the period since about
1965: for the 'first generation' Butler has barely more space at his disposal than van
der Will for three works by E. Y. Meyer. Some editorial cross-referencingbetween
the survey chapters and the monographs would have given a greater coherence to
the book as a whole. Within these limits, however, this is a dependable and
informative volume.
Otto F. Walter did not form the Luchterhand Verlag in 1966 (p. 73). Ninive is
consistently misspelt.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM J. H. REID
This content downloaded from 134.129.120.3 on Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:27:11 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
264 Reviews
attracted the first generation of readers to his work as much as the allusions or his
political point of view. He evidently enjoyed language, played with it, and involved
his readers in the game too.
Jens Simon's thesis, however, deals with only a tiny area of the topic (a longer
study by Barbara Malchow, dealing with the language of the more major works,
appeared in 1980). He limits his attention to the progress that can be discerned
within the so-called 'Brotarbeiten' from the middle to the late I950s. He
demonstrates, with the help of meticulous statistical analyses, that Schmidt's
punctuation, syntax, orthography, and word-formationdid develop away from the
'Dudennorm', and come to reflect his declared mimetic aims. Simon is able to throw
some light upon the short typescript pieces which appear to fall between the two
main groups of stories. It is interesting, too, to read of the changes editors made to
Schmidt's stories for newspaper publication, which tended to edit Schmidt back in
the direction of the very norms from which he was distancing himself.
But the book as a whole is not to be recommended to any but the most dedicated
Schmidt scholars. It is not intrinsically trivial to study these works, which, although
minor, are often fascinating and exist in different versions, comparisons between
which can be and have been revealing in a way that tells us a lot about the
mysterious processes of Schmidt's writing mind. At least one of the stories,
'Trommler beim Zaren', has been the subject of analyses which convincingly
suggest that it is a key point in Schmidt's development of multi-layered prose. Simon
is concerned with language only in a very mechanical sense, however. Although his
analyses claim to be both quantitative and qualitative, they tend to be the former. I
am not really sure that Simon establishes much more than is pretty obvious to any
reader of Schmidt (syntax becomes more paratactic; neologisms multiply, punctua-
tion marks increase, and have differentuses as Schmidt gathers pace towards Zettel's
Traum,and so forth). Moreover, the book is written in a very dreary way: it is really a
set of experiments written up, rather than a piece of writing about Schmidt. It is a
philological training exercise, hardly a book. There is the material here for a short
article, but not for a full-length study.
JESUS COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE MICHAEL MINDEN
This content downloaded from 134.129.120.3 on Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:27:11 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions