You are on page 1of 1

through and through, though he applies Zeno’s paradoxes of space to time instead: if, in the present moment

(B) in which Alice is larger than she was in a previous moment (A), Alice measures X, in the immediately
subsequent moment of her growth (C) she will become larger than she is now (at B) but smaller than she will
be in an even-further moment of her growth (D). Very well. Yet, firstly, Alice becomes bigger and smaller in
two different senses. Secondly, ‘smaller’ and ‘bigger’ do not become in turn. It is only by substituting
‘nonsense’ for ‘sense’ (cf. ibid., pp. 66–73), it is only by dismantling the space of meaningfulness secured by
τὸ ἀγαθόν that Deleuze’s reasoning seems to stand – and yet it is self-refuting! Notice, in this respect, how
Plato not only evokes in Phdr. 261d Zeno’s deceptive way of reasoning, but also refers to him in Phd., 261d
as someone who ‘argues so very artfully that the same things appear to his listeners to be both similar and
dissimilar, one and many, still and in motion’ not only at the same time but in the same sense. It is against
their admixture that τὸ ἀγαθόν’s prevents.

References
Beekes, Robert, with the assistance of Lucien Van Beek (2010): Etymological Dictionary of Greek. 2 vols.
Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Deleuze, Gilles (1990): The Logic of Sense, ed. Constantin V. Boundas, trans. Mark Lester with Charles
Stivale. London & New York: The Athlone Press & Columbia University Press.
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1971): Sämtliche Werke, vol. 10. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Heidegger, Martin (1988): Gesamtausgabe, vol. 34, ed. Hermann Mörchen. Frankfurt am Main:
Klostermann.
Hyland, Drew H. (1995): Finitude and Transcendence in the Platonic Dialogues. Albany: State University of
New York Press.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1999): The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings, ed. Raymond Geuss and Ronald
Speirs, trans. Ronald Speirs. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph (1857): Sämtliche Werke, vol. 12. Stuttgart-Augsburg: Cotta.
Segovia, Carlos A. (2023a): ‘Eἶδος⧹Utupë: On the Dissymmetric Reciprocity of the Real and the Symbolic’.
In Langage, interprétation, représentation: perspectives pluriculturelles, transhistoriques et
interdisciplinaires, ed. Fionn Bennett, Céline Denat, and Patrick Wotling. Reims: Éditions et Presses
Universitaires de Reims, pp. 63–95.
Segovia, Carlos A. (2023b): ‘Reality & Thought, Earth & World in Fichte: A (Neo-)Structuralist
Interpretation of the Wissenschaftslehre of 1812’. Submitted to Fichte Studien (Brill) in January 2023.
Segovia, Carlos A., and Sofya Shaikut Segovia (2023): Dionysus and Apollo after Nihilism: Rethinking the
Earth–World Divide. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Severino, Emanuele (2016): The Essence of Nihilism, trans. Giacomo Donis, ed. Ines Testoni and Alessandro
Carrera. London & New York: Verso.
Valentim, Marco Antonio (2018): Extramundanidade e sobrenatureza. Ensaios de ontologia infundamental.
Florianópolis, Cultura e Barbárie.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1974): Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, with
an Introduction by Bertrand Russell; revised ed. London & New York: Routledge, 1974.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2008): Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911–1951, ed. B.
McGuinness, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte. Oxford & Malden, Ma.:
Blackwell.

You might also like