___________ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

School ID: 122858

Catarman, Northern Samar

ENHANCEDSCHOOLIMPRO
VEMENTPLAN

School Year 2019 – 2022

School Improve-
ment Plan 0
Message

SCHOOL HEAD’S MESSAGE

Being an instructional leader and manager in school you are like a captain

of a vessel as you guide your school toward its goal, which is to provide quality ed-

ucation to its pupils. The captain is responsible for mapping the path of the expedi -

tion as well as the fate of everyone on the ship. He/She does not only need to know

where to go, but also how to get there on time safe and sound. Just like the captain

of the vessel, school head is the responsible person in ensuring that jobs are un-

derstood, supervised, and accomplished. He/She is the responsible person in

transforming the school into a more effective organization that foster powerful

teaching-learning for the benefits of all pupils.

Had Teacher-I

School Improve-
ment Plan 1
Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Department of Education’s Vision, Page 5

Mission, and Core Values Statement

Chapter 2. School’s Current Situation Page 10

Chapter 3. Plan Page 21

Chapter 4. Monitoring and Evaluation Page 41

List of Acronyms Page 3

List of Tables and Illustrations Page 4

Annual Implementation Plan (AIP) Page 34

School Improve-
ment Plan 2
List of Acronyms

DepEd - Department of Education

SIP - School Improvement Plan
ESIP- Enhanced School Improvement Plan
AIP - Annual Improvement Plan
PIA - Priority Improvement Area
SPT- School Community Planning Team
TWG-Technical Working Group

School Improve-
ment Plan 3
List of Tables and Illustrations

Table 1: Enrolment Male and Female for the last three years Page… 10
Table 2: Cohort Survival Rate Page… 11
Table 3: Completion Rate Page… 12
Table 4: Transition Rate Page… 12
Table 5: Dropout Rate Page… 13
Table 6: Mean Percentage Score (S.Y. 2016-2017, 2017-2018, Page… 15
2018-2019)
Table 7: Levels of Priority of Priority Improvement Areas Page… 16
Table 8: Planning Worksheet on Governance Page… 18
Table 9: School Projects as Solutions Page… 21
Table 10: Project Teams Page… 22
Table 11: Project Monitoring Report Form Page… 41

School Improve-
ment Plan 4
CHAPTER 1
C
DepEd Vision, Mission and Core Values Statement H
A
P
T
VISION
E
We dream of Filipinos who passionately love their country R
and whose values and competencies enable them
to realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully to building the nation.
As a learner-centered public institution, the Department of Education 1
continuously improves itself to better serve its stakeholders.

MISSION
To protect and promote the right of every Filipino to
quality, equitable, culture-based, and complete basic education where:
STUDENTS learn in a child-friendly, gender-sensitive,
safe, and motivating environment;
TEACHERS facilitate learning and constantly nurture every learner;
ADMINISTRATOR and staff, as stewards of the institution,
ensure an enabling and supportive environment
for effective learning to happen; and
FAMILY, COMMUNITY and other STAKEHOLDERS
are actively engaged and share responsibility
for developing life-long learners.

CORE VALUES
Maka-Diyos
Maka-Tao
Maka-kalikasan
Maka-Bansa

School Improve-
ment Plan 5
 C
H
A
P
T
E
R

C
H
A
P
T
E
R

Education is the most powerful weapon we can use to change the world, thus Lib-
erty Elementary School is committed to serve the pupils by educating them desir-
able knowledge, understanding, skills, interest, attitudes, and critical thinking.
The Liberty Elementary School is guided by the 5C’s Principle

School Improve-
ment Plan 6
Character- we believe that character is the ultimate goal of education because ed-
ucation without character is useless. Thus, we are committed to build a child’s
well-being by helping him/her develop character grounded on a strong faith on the
Divine Creator and compassion for other people.
Collaboration- the Liberty Elementary School believes that working together can
make the works easier and more productive. Thus, we are committed to work as a
group to serve the school for the benefits of our learners.
Compassion-this is a word for a very positive emotion that has to do with being
thoughtful and decent. We are willing to help the school wholeheartedly with our
time, efforts, and resources.
Competence- the Liberty Elementary School assures that its personnel has the
ability to do something successfully or efficiently in relation to fulfilling its duties
and functions.
Commitment- We are all committed to service.

The Liberty Elementary School School-Community Planning Team

NAME ROLE
ROBERTO RUBEN F. PULG Team Leader, School Head
HON. LITO BENESISTO Brgy. Chairman
EDRALYN T. DIAZ Member, Teacher Representative
JUDESSA F. ATENCIO HRPTA President Grade IV
LEIZEL B. TRONGCOSO HRPTA President Grade I & III
EVA V. DELORINO HRPTA President Grade II & VI
RIC T. CATUNHAY HRPTA President Grade V
JEMMY A. ATENCIO Barangay Administration
ARTHUR D. VILLANUEVA Education Committee, Chairman
SALVE C. DIANO Chairman Committee on Health
Chairman Committee on Peace and Or-
MARBEN L. ALEJANDRO
der
ROYALLY CATUNHAY Member, Pupil Representative

ROLE RESPONSIBILITIES
Actively participates in the development of the SIP by estab-
SPGO Rep. lishing priorities and setting goals and strategies for school
improvement
Initiates the formation of the School Planning Team
Team Leader Convenes the School Planning Team
(School Head) Provides leadership and guidance in the development of the
plan, clearly explains the SIP planning process to the plan-
ning team, and helps them understand their role in the
process
Facilitates actual planning workshop

School Improve-
ment Plan 7
 C
H
A
P
Informs the team on school programs T
Share insights about their learning experiences- what they en-
Student Rep. joy doing, what they feel uncomfortable with in school or E
school task where they find difficulty in - and participate in R
setting goals, strategies, and priorities of the school
Share their children’s experiences in school, their insights

Parent Rep.
about what their children need to learn and the difficulties 1
they face in school, their aspirations for the school and their
children; present other areas of concerns; and participate in
setting goals, strategies, and priorities of the school
Commit available resource in the implementation of the plan
Provide needed information relative to teaching and learning
Teacher Rep. process and programs
Actively participate during the development of the SIP-estab-
lishing priorities, setting goals, and formulating implementa-
tion strategies for the plan
LGU Rep. Share valuable information on the interest and concerns of
the community in school improvement and participate in set-
Alumni Rep. ting goals, strategies and priorities of the school
Commit available resources in the implementation of the plan

Provides insights and inputs ensure the learner’s rights are

Sch. CPC
considered and that their responsibilities are integrated in the
Rep.
programs and projects to be identified

SPT TIMETABLE

PERSONS
DATE ACTIVITY TARGET OUTPUTS
INVOLVED
Jan. - Dec. Annex 1A, 1B, SRC,
Data Gathering SIP TWG
2021 2A, 2B, 2C, SAT

School Head
Formal Invitation of Invitation Letter,
Jan. 25, (SH),
Prospective SPT Mem- Letter Response
2021 Head
bers
Teacher

School Memo on SPT

Jan. 26,
with Names, Roles and
2019 SPT Orientation & Vi- SIP SPT,
TORs, CR on Vision
(8:00 – sion Sharing TWG
sharing, SPT
11:00)
Timetable
Jan. 27,
Project Management
2019 Process Flowcharts to
Team Orientation SH, Teachers
(1:00 – each PIA
5:00)
Listening to the Voice of Document of Inter-
Feb (Week
the stakeholders TWG views and Observa-
1)
tions

School Improve-
ment Plan 8
 P
T
E
R
Root Cause Analysis
Feb (Week School Head,
Workshop Root Cause Analysis
2) TWG 1

Write-shop on the craft-

Feb (Week ing of the Project Work School Head, Project Work Plans
4) Plan & Budget Matrix TWG and Budget Matrixes

School Head,
Presentation of the ESIP Enhanced
Feb 4 HT, SGC,
to the SGC and Final- School-Community
(Week 1) Faulty &
ization Improvement Plan
Staff
Submission of the ESIP ESIP recommended for
School Head,
Feb week 4) to the Division Ap-
DAC
praisal Committee approval to the SDS
March Approved and ac-
Approval of the ESIP SDS
(Week 1) cepted ESIP

Chapter 2
C
Assess
H
A. School’s Current Situation A
The Liberty Elementary School (LES)), with school ID 122858, is situated in P
Brgy. Liberty, Catarman, Northern Samar. The school is about 3 kilometers from
Brgy. Polangi and 30 kilometers from Catarman proper which can be reached via
T
motorcycle (a.k.a. habal-habal). The school is currently classified as a small E
school with a total population of eighty four (84) enrollees for the current school R
year 2019-2020; with one (1) school head and six (6) teachers a total of seven (&)

School Improve- 2
ment Plan 9
school personnel. Kindergarten and Grade One is being handled by one teacher.
With four (4) buildings two (2) of which are dilapidated and other buildings/
classrooms needs repair.

For the last three school years, the total enrolment shows a decreasing
pattern: 96 (SY 17-18), 94 (SY 18-19), and 83 (SY 19-20). A more detailed trend
of enrolment for male and female students is shown in the graph and table be-
low:

120

100 96 94
83
80

60 56 53
47
40 41
40 36

20

0
SY 2017-2018 SY 2018-2019 SY 2019-2020

Female Male Total

SY 2017 - 2018 SY 2018 - 2019 SY 2019 - 2020

Female 40 41 36
Male 56 53 47
Total 96 94 83
Table 1: Enrolment Male and Female for the last three years

The Cohort Survival Rate are as follows for the last three consecutive years.

C
H
A
P
T
E
R
School Improve-
ment Plan 10
2
 Cohort Survival Rate
84.00%
82.00%
80.00%
78.00%
76.00%
74.00%
72.00%
70.00%
SY 2017-2018 SY 2018-2019 SY 2019-2020

Cohort Survival Rate

SY 2017 - 2018 SY 2018 - 2019 SY 2019 - 2020
82.35% 76% 77%
Table 2: Cohort Survival Rate

The Cohort Survival Rate is defined as the percentage of enrollees at the beginning
grade in a given school year who reached the final grade of elementary education
level. In the presentation above, the data accentuate that there is a declined from
94.18% for the school year 2016-2017 to 82.35% for the school year 2017-2018
and finally a tremendous fall down of for the school year 2018-2019 which only
about 76%.

The performance indicator for Completion Rate of the school for the last three con-
secutive years.

School Improve-
ment Plan 11
 Completion Rate C
84.00% H
82.00% A
80.00% P
78.00% T
76.00% E
74.00% R
72.00%
70.00% 2
SY 2017-2018 SY 2018-2019 SY 2019-2020

Completion Rate
SY 2017 - 2018 SY 2018 - 2019 SY 2019 - 2020
82.35% 76% 78%
Table 3: Completion Rate

Completion Rate is the percentage of first year entrants in a level of education who
complete/ finish the level in accordance with the required number of years of
study. In the data presented above, it shows that there are enrollees who did not
completed the grade level on the specified time frame.
The Transition Rate of the school for the last three consecutive years.

TRANSITION RATE
95.50%

95.00%

94.50%

94.00%

93.50%

93.00%
SY 2017-2018 SY 2018-2019 SY 2019-2020

Transition Rate
SY 2017 - 2018 SY 2018 - 2019 SY 2019 - 2020
95.00% 93.75% 94.65%
Table 4: Transition Rate

School Improve-
ment Plan 12
Transition Rate is the percentage of pupils who finish from one level of education
and move on to the next higher level. In the data, it shows that there are enrollees
who did not enroll to the next grade level.
C
The Dropout Rate of the school for the last three consecutive years. H
A
DROP OUT RATE P
2.50% T
E
2.00% R
1.50%
2
1.00%

0.50%

0.00%
SY 2017-2018 SY 2018-2019 SY 2019-2020

Dropout Rate
SY 2017 - 2018 SY 2018 - 2019 SY 2019 - 2020
0% 2.06% 1.06%
Table 5: Dropout Rate

The Dropout Rate is the proportion of pupils who leave the school during the year.
For the School Year 2016-2017 and School Year 2017-2018 the school recorded
zero dropout. It was a good sign of school performance, but for the School Year
2018-2019 the school recorded 2.06% dropout rate.
In addition, as results in the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) the following are the
issues and concerns that needs to be addressed by the School Planning Team (SPT)
Absenteeism is still recorded in teacher’s report of attendance and it is alarming.
Reasons for which is mostly economic and lack of discipline.
Despite efforts to address reading deficiencies there are still non-readers espe-
cially in the primary levels both in English and Filipino.
The national standard of 1:1 textbook to student ratio is yet far from reality. At
present, the dearth of Learner’s Materials (or textbooks) is evident:
In the recent survey on Child Friendly School conducted by the SDRRMC, the
school scored only 24, thereby placing the school below the Child-Friendly School
points of 25. An outstanding Child-Friendly School score requirement is 30.
The connection of the water system of the school was been damaged by several
calamities (damaged from the reservoir of the water beyond the capacity of
the school to restore the connection) as a results hand washing facility and com-
fort rooms of the school are no supply of water.
There is a need to build a perimeter fence of the school to safeguard the learners
and school’s properties.

School Improve-
ment Plan 13
There is no potable drinking water inside the classroom.
There is a need to acquire electric fans for every classrooms.
The buildings of the school needs repair and two (2) buildings are dilapidated. C
There is a need to construct pathway and canopy for the pupils to become safe and
protected from harm. H
There is a need to replace the electrical wirings of the school. A
The provision of the steel gate of the school pergola is needed.
Construction of one () Comfort Room is needed.
P
Teachers need to attend to different trainings, workshop, Writeshop etc. on T
methodologies, techniques and strategies in teaching to enhance and update their E
expertise in teaching.
Provision of school and office supplies. R
Intensive instructional supervision to teachers.
This year’s SBM self-assessment, has placed the Liberty Elementary School at 2
Level 1 with a Qualitative Interpretation of Developing. Major areas of concern
are: (1) absence of manual that defines the processes, systems and terms of ref-
erence, (2) School Governing Council is not in place, (3) absence of records and
resources management system that is compliant to SBM principles, (4) sustain-
able partners are not established, and (5) low support of stakeholders.

All these factors are contributory to the low performance of the school’s Mean Per-
centage Score (MPS) as revealed in the table below:

Mean Percentage Score

Subjects SY 2017 - 2018 SY 2018 - 2019 SY 2019 - 2020
MTB-MLE 75.12% 79.78% 77.99%
ENGLISH 71.27% 77.94% 73.26%
MATH 73.11% 78.45% 74.00%
SCIENCE 71.35% 77.75% 72.92%
FILIPINO 75.92% 78.78% 76.55%
AP 74.35% 78.56% 77.22%

School Improve-
ment Plan 14
 MAPEH 74.54% 78.89% 78.50%
TLE 74.70% 78.33% 76.89%
ESP 75.84% 82.44% 82.53% C
AVERAGE 73.98% 79.03% 76.75% H
Table 6: Mean Percentage Score (S.Y. 2016-2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019) A
B. Priority Improvement Areas P
As presented in Chapter 1, the school’s current situation, School Planning T
Team (SPT) identified the Priority Improvement Areas (PIAs). After determining the
levels of strategic importance, urgency, magnitude and feasibility of each PIA, their
E
corresponding priority levels were likewise measured. R
PRIORITY IMPROVE- Strat. AVE. INTERPRE-
Urgency Magnitude Feasibility
MENT AREA
Text Books and LMs
Imp. RATING TATION
2
Ratio to pupils is be- Very High
low standard 5 5 5 5 5 Priority
Very High
Low MPS 5 5 4 5 4.75 Priority
Provision of school Very High
and Office Supplies 4 4 5 5 4.5 Priority
Very High
Non-Readers 5 5 3 5 4.5 Priority
Creating a Child Very High
friendly School 5 4 4 5 4.5 Priority
SBM Level 4 3 5 5 4.25 High Priority
Decrease Cohort Sur-
vival Rate 5 4 3 5 4.25 High Priority
Decrease Completion
Rate 5 4 3 5 4.25 High Priority
Decrease Participa-
tion Rate 5 4 2 5 4 High Priority
Absenteeism 5 4 2 5 4 High Priority
water connection 5 5 5 1 4 High Priority
Provision of Steel
Gate 5 5 5 1 4 High Priority
Attendance of teach-
ers in training,
Writeshop, etc. 4 3 4 4 3.75 High Priority
Dropout Rate 5 3 2 5 3.75 High Priority
potable drinking wa-
ter 4 4 5 2 3.75 High Priority
Provision of Electric
fans 4 4 5 1 3.5 High Priority
Building/Classrooms
repair 4 4 2 3 3.25 Low Priority
Replacement of
school electrical
wirings 3 4 3 3 3.25 Low Priority
perimeter fence 3 2 3 1 2.25 Low Priority

School Improve-
ment Plan 15
 Construction of One
CR 3 4 1 1 2.25 Low Priority
Construction of path- C
way 3 2 1 1 1.75 Low Priority
H
construction of
canopy 3 1 1 1 1.5 Low Priority A
Table 7: Levels of Priority of Priority Improvement Areas P
C. Planning Worksheets T
The planning worksheet below is anchored on the Intermediate Outcomes E
(IOs) of the Department of Education. The root causes were identified after the R
Project Teams have conducted a thorough root-cause-analysis using appropriate
problem analysis tools. The root cause is the deepest underlying cause of the prob-
lems within any process. 2
Table 7: Planning Worksheet on Access & Quality
ACCESS & QUALITY
DEPED PRIORITY IM- GENERAL ROOT TIME FRAME (SY)
INTER- PROVEMENT OBJECTIVES CAUSES 19 – 20 – 21 –
MEDI- AREA 20 21 22
ATE
OUT-
COMES
IO1: Decrease To increase Co- Transfer ____ ____ ____
X
Learn- Cohort Sur- hort Survival of resi-
ers are vival Rate Rate dence/
in Decrease To increase Migration ____ ____ ____
X
school Completion Completion Rate
and in Rate Lack of
learning Decrease To increase Par- interest ____ ____ ____
X
centers Participation ticipation Rate
Rate
Absenteeism To reduce preva- Socio-de- ____ ____ ____
X
lence of absen- mo-
teeism by 10% graphic
each year status
Lack of
interest
to study
Zero out Zero out Socio-de- ____ ____ ____
Dropout Dropout Rate mo-
Rate graphic
status

Lack of
interest
to study

School Improve-
ment Plan 16
 Transfer
of resi-
dence/
C
Migration
IO2: ____ ____ ____ H
Learn- Text Book To meet the No avail- A
ers ac- and LMs Ra- standard ratio of able
P
cess tio to pupils textbooks and Text-
pro- is below LMs to 1:1 books T
grams standard and LMs E
respon- in the R
sive to school
their
needs 2
and
consis-
tent
with
their in-
terests
and ap-
titudes
IO3: ____ ____ ____
Learn- Lack of
ers en- activities
joy and pro-
learner- Creating a To attain at least grams re-
friendly Child 30 points (Out- lated to
environ- Friendly standing) in the Creating
ment School Child-Friendly a Child
IO4: School Survey in Friendly
Learn- the next 3 years School
ers ac-
tively
partici-
pate in
their
learning
environ-
ment
____ ____ ____

To obtain at
least a 5% an-

School Improve-
ment Plan 17
IO5: Low MPS nual increase of Poor
Learn- MPS from the Reading
ers at- baseline Compre-
tain hension
learning To zero-out non- Lack of ____ ____ ____ C
stan- Non-Readers readers and interest H
dards learners at frus- A
tration level each Lack of
year parent P
support T
E
Retention
Span is R
short
2
Provision of To provide Lack of ____ ____ ____
X
School and School and Of- School
Office Sup- fice Supplies and Of-
plies fice Sup-
plies
IO6: ____ ____ ____
Learn-
ers are
well-
rounded
, happy
and
smart

Table 8: Planning Worksheet on Governance

GOVERNANCE
DEPED PRIORITY IM- GENERAL ROOT TIME FRAME (SY)
INTER- PROVEMENT OBJECTIVES CAUSES 19 – 20 – 21 –
MEDI- AREA 20 21 22
ATE
OUT-
COMES

School Improve-
ment Plan 18
IO1: ____ ____ ____
Educa- SBM Level To maintain or Poor par-
tion increase the ticipation C
leaders SBM level of the of stake-
and school holders H
man- A
agers P
practice
partici-
T
pative E
and in- R
clusive
man-
age- 2
ment
pro-
cesses
IO2: In- Conflict ____ ____ ____
X
ternal Attendance To send teachers of sched-
systems of teachers and SH to train- ule.
and in training, ings, seminars, Lack of
pro- Writeshop, Writeshop, etc. trainings
cesses etc. etc.
needed
for con-
tinuous
im-
prove-
ment in
place
IO3: water con- To provide water No water ____ ____ ____
X
Grow- nection connection of connec-
ing the school tion
number Provision of To provide steel No Steel ____ ____ ____
X
of Steel Gate gate of the per- Gate
stake- gola
holders potable To provide No ____ ____ ____
X
actively drinking wa- drinking water potable
partici- ter inside the class- drinking
pate room water in-
and col- side the
laborate class-
in con- room
ver- Provision of To provide elec- No elec- ____ ____ ____
X
gence Electric fans tric fans tric fans
mecha- Building/ To repair 4 Class- ____ ____ ____
X
nisms Classrooms classrooms. rooms

School Improve-
ment Plan 19
at all repair needs re-
levels pair
Replacement To replace Electrical ____ ____ ____ C
X
of school school electrical wiring H
electrical wirings needs re-
A
wirings place-
ment P
perimeter To construct No
X
____ ____ ____ T
fence perimeter fence perimeter
E
fence
Construc- To construct Lack of 1 ____ ____ ____ R
X
tion of One One CR CR
CR 2
Construc- To construct Unfin- ____ ____ ____
X
tion of path- pathway ished
way pathway
construction To construct No ____ ____ ____
X
of canopy canopy canopy

School Improve-
ment Plan 20
Chapter 3
Plan
C
A. List of Solutions H
The identified school projects are meant to serve as solutions that will ad- A
dress the root cause/s of each identified PIA. A Project Work Plan and Budget Ma- P
trix has been developed by each Project Team and are attached herein. To ensure
support to the projects and their alignments to the yearly targets of the school, the T
projects are likewise integrated in the Annual Implementation Plans. E
Table 9: School Projects as Solutions R
PROJECT OBJECTIVE/S COVERED PIAs
To increase Cohort Sur- Decrease Cohort Survival
vival Rate Rate 3
To increase Completion Decrease Completion Rate
Rate Decrease Participation
HALINA MAG-ARAL To increase Participation Rate
KAIBIGAN Rate Absenteeism
To reduce prevalence of Zero out Dropout Rate
absenteeism by 10%
each year
Zero out Dropout Rate
To attain at least 30 Creating a Child Friendly
points (Out-standing) in School
Project LIGTAS the Child-Friendly
School Survey in the
next 3 years
To obtain at least a 2% Low MPS
quarterly increase of Non-Readers
MPS from the baseline Provision of School and
To zero-out non-readers Office Supplies
and learners at frustra- Text Book and LMs Ratio
LEARNING IS FUN tion level each year to pupils is below stan-
To provide School and dard
Office Supplies
To meet the standard
ratio of textbooks and
LMs to 1:1

Project LEAD
To maintain or increase Reluctant participation of
L-Leading the SBM level of the stakeholders
E-Education school Conflict of schedule.
A-and Lack of trainings, seminar,
D-Development To send teachers and writeshop etc.
SH to trainings, semi-
nars, writeshop, webinar

School Improve-
ment Plan 21
 etc.
To provide water con-
nection of the school
To provide steel gate of
the pergola
To provide drinking wa-
ter inside the classroom
To provide electric fans
To repair 4 classrooms.
To replace school electri-
cal wirings
Project BULIG To construct perimeter
fence
To construct One CR
To construct pathway
To construct canopy
To provide Learning Ac-
tivity Sheet
Capacitate teachers in
the formulating/create a
Project LAS LAS appropriate to the
Learners need.
Contextualized/Local-
ized the Learning Activ-
ity Sheet.
No water connection
Provision of Steel Gate C
Potable Drinking Water
Provision of Electric fans H
Building/Classrooms re- A
pair
Replacement of school P
electrical wirings T
Perimeter fence
Construction of One CR E
Construction of pathway R
Construction of Canopy
3
Low MPS
Non-Readers
Provision of School and
Office Supplies
Text Book and LMs Ratio
to pupils is below stan-
dard

Table 10: Project Teams

PROJECT Project Team Leader Member Scribe
NAME Coach
HALINA Marben L. Arthur D. Roberto Jemmy A.
MAG-ARAL Alejandro Villanueva Ruben F. Atencio
KAIBIGAN Pulga
Project Salve C. Judessa F. Ric. T. Judessa F.
LIGTAS Diano Atencio Catunhay Atencio
LEARNING IS Roberto Amor P. Royally V. Eva V.
FUN Ruben F. Moreno Catunhay Delorino
Pulga
Project Roberto Edralyn T. Jemmy A. Salve C.
LEAD Ruben F. Diaz Atencio Diano
Pulga
Project Arthur D. Eva V. Ric. T. Liezel B.
BULIG Villanueva Delorino Catunhay Trongcoso
Project LAS Roberto Mary Grace A. Kristine P. Jason T.
Ruben Pulga Florano Lozano Saldo
Project HLI Roberto Jeyan Connie Kristine L. Amor P.
Ruben Pulga Ocanada Portes Moreno

School Improve-
ment Plan 22
Project Team Roles and Functions

Coach

Devises directions and facilitates crafting of work plans

Develops a strategy the team will use to reach its goal C
Provides coaching and technical assistance to the Team Leader H
Initiates appropriate training that team members need
Monitors and assesses the project implementation A
Provides feedback to the team for appropriate adjustments P
Team Leader T
E
Works collaboratively with the Coach R
Communicates clear instructions to team members
3
Listens to team members' feedback

Ensures team members' participation and provides technical assistance when

deemed necessary

Manages the day-to-day operations of the project implementation

Creates reports to update the School Planning Team on the Team’s progress

Distributes reports to the appropriate personnel

Member

Actively participates in the planning/designing, implementation and adjustments of

the project based on
Undertakes assigned roles within agreed timescales
Shares collective responsibility for the performance of the team
Demonstrates drive, determination, enthusiasm and an ability to work effectively as
member
Supports and promotes teamwork and maintain regular dialogue with all members
of the team
Supports fellow team members to achieve deadlines within and beyond own area of
responsibility
Attends and contributes to team meetings ensuring that experiences in the imple-
mentation of the program/project are shared with the team
Seeks and provides regular constructive feedback

Scribe

Ensures meetings are effectively organized and recorded in the minutes

Keeps a record of the team’s activities and progress of the program/project
Prepares and sends communications to all team members.
Performs ther functions as member of the team.

School Improve-
ment Plan 23
 Project Title: HALINA MAG-ARAL KAIBIGAN C
H
A
Problem Statement: Cohort Survival Rate, Completion Rate, and Participation P
Rate are below the planning standard. There is prevalence of absenteeism and
recorded dropout rate of 2.06 for the last school year. T
E
Project Objective Statement: R
To increase Cohort Survival Rate
To increase Completion Rate
To increase Participation Rate 3
To reduce prevalence of absenteeism by 10% each year
Zero out Dropout Rate

Root Cause:

Lack of interest to study

Socio-demographic status
Transfer of residence/Migration

Project Work Plan & Budget Matrix

Activity Output Date of Responsi- Budget Budget
Implementa- ble Person Source
tion

100% Project
Advocacy Cohort Jan-May Team 1,000 MOOE
campaign Survival School head
for enrol- Rate
ment 100%
Comple-
Project
tion
Hanging of Jan-May Team
tarpaulins Rate School head 1,000 MOOE
100%
Partici-
pation Project
Rate Jan-May Team 1,000 MOOE
Distribution Reduced School head
of fliers preva-
lence of
absen- Project
Bandilio Jan-May Team 0 MOOE
teeism
School head
by 10%
each Project
Home Visi- year Year round Team 500 MOOE
tation Zero out School head
Dropout Teachers

School Improve-
ment Plan 24
 Rate
ACR of
the ac- C
tivity H
A
P
Project Title: Project LIGTAS T
Problem Statement:
E
The school is not in the category of Child-Friendly School R
Project Objective Statement:
To attain at least 30 points (Out-standing) in the Child-Friendly School Survey in
the next 3 years 3
Root Cause:
Lack of activities and programs related to Creating a Child Friendly School

Project Work Plan & Budget Matrix

Activity Output Date of Responsi- Budget Budget
Implementa- ble Person Source
tion

Review the Full un- Project

manual of derstand- Jan-May Team 1,000 MOOE
Creating a ing of the School head
Child CCFSS
Friendly
School (ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Conduct Results of Jan-May Project

the assess- the CCFSS Team 1,000 MOOE
ment of the assess- School head
school per- ment
formance
via-a-vis (ACR of
with the the activ-
manual of ity)
CFSS

Project
Conduct Conducted Year round Team 10,000 MOOE
activities activities School head
and pro- and pro-
grams re- grams re-
lated to lated to
Creating a Creating a
Child Child
Friendly Friendly

School Improve-
ment Plan 25
 School School

C
(ACR of H
the activ-
ity) A
P
T
Project Title: LEARNING IS FUN
E
Problem Statement: There are non-readers in the school particularly in the pri- R
mary level affecting the MPS results per quarter. Contributory factors are text-
books and LMs ratio is below the planning standard.
3
Project Objective Statement:
To obtain at least a 2% quarterly increase of MPS from the baseline
To zero-out non-readers and learners at frustration level each year
To provide School and Office Sup-plies
To meet the standard ratio of textbooks and LMs to 1:1

Root Cause:
Poor Reading Comprehension
Lack of interest
Lack of parent support
Retention Span is short
Lack of School and Office Supplies

Project Work Plan & Budget Matrix

Activity Output Date of Responsi- Budget Budget
Implementa- ble Person Source
tion

Conduct Results of Project

Pre assess- assess- June Team 1,000 MOOE
ment on ment of School head
reading reading
levels both
in English
and Fil- (ACR of the
ipino activity)

(Reading
Inventory)

Conduct Conducted June Project

GPTA GPTA Team 1,000 MOOE
Meeting Meeting School head

(ACR of the

School Improve-
ment Plan 26
 activity)

Conduct Conducted Project

Classroom Classroom Year round Team 5,000 MOOE
C
First Ini- First Ini- School head H
tiative to tiative to
Zero out Zero out
A
non read- non read- P
ers ers
T
(ACR of the E
activity)
R

Provide Provided Year round Project

School School Team 10,000 MOOE
3
Supplies Supplies School head

(ACR of the
activity)

Conduct Conducted February Project

Post as- Post as- Team 1,000 MOOE
sessment sessment School head
on reading on reading
levels both levels both
in English in English
and Fil- and Fil-
ipino ipino

(Reading (Reading
Inventory) Inventory)

(ACR of the
activity)

Project Title: Project LEAD

L-Leading
E-Education
A-and
D-Development

Problem Statement: The teachers are need to send to trainings for the enhance-
ments of their pedagogical skills in facilitating learnings. The SBM level of prac-
tice of the school is still in the Level I “Developing”

Project Objective Statement:

To maintain or increase the SBM level of the school

School Improve-
ment Plan 27
 To send teachers and SH to trainings, seminars, Writeshop, etc.
C
Root Cause: H
Poor participation of stakeholders
Conflict of schedule A
Lack of trainings etc. P
Project Work Plan & Budget Matrix T
Activity Output Date of Responsi- Budget Budget E
Implementa- ble Person Source
tion R
Conduct Conducted Project
Pre assess- Pre assess- May Team 1,000 MOOE 3
ment of ment of School head
school’s school’s
SBM level SBM level
(ACR of the
activity)

Review the Reviewed June Project

manual of the man- Team 1,000 MOOE
SBM Tool ual of School head
SBM Tool

(ACR of the
activity)

Data col- Collected Project

lection data on Year round Team 1,000 MOOE
SBM Vali- School head
dation
(ACR of the
activity)

Conduct Conducted Year round Project

activities activities Team 10,000 MOOE
and pro- and pro- School head
grams re- grams re-
lated to lated to
SBM SBM
Conduct Conduct
assess- assess-
ment of ment of
teachers’ teachers’
training training
needs needs

(ACR of the
activity)

School Improve-
ment Plan 28
 Conduct Conducted
SLAC / SLAC / Year round Project
send sent teach- Team 1,000 MOOE C
teachers to ers to School head H
trainings trainings
A
(ACR of the P
activity)
T
E
Project Title: Project BULIG R
Problem Statement:
Lacking of amenities, equipment, and supplies. 3
Project Objective Statement:

To provide water connection of the school

To provide steel gate of the pergola
To provide drinking water inside the classroom
To provide electric fans
To repair 4 classrooms.
To replace school electrical wirings
To construct perimeter fence
To construct One CR
To construct pathway
To construct canopy

Root Cause:
No water connection
No Steel Gate
No potable drinking water inside the classroom
No electric fans
Classrooms needs repair
Electrical wiring needs replacement
No perimeter fence
Lack of 1 CR
Unfinished pathway
No canopy

Project Work Plan & Budget Matrix

Activity Output Date of Responsi- Budget Budget
Implementa- ble Person Source
tion

Conduct Conducted Project C

GPTA Meet- GPTA June Team 1,000 MOOE
ing Meeting School head
H
A
(ACR of
the activ-
P
T
School Improve- E
ment Plan 29R
 ity)

water con- Estab- October Project

nection lished wa- Team 10,000 MLGU
ter con- School head
nection

(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Provision of Steel gate Project

steel gate (ACR of Year round Team 5,000 MOOE
the activ- School head
ity)

Provision of Acquired Year round Project

potable potable Team 3,000 Stakehold-
drinking drinking School head ers
water inside water in- MOOE
the class- side the
room classroom

(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Provision of Electric Year round Project

electric fans fans Team 7,000 MOOE
School head
(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Repaired Project
Classrooms class- Year round Team 50,000 MOOE
repair rooms School head
(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Electrical New elec- Year round Project

wiring re- trical Team 10,000 MOOE
placement wirings School head

(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Con- Project
Construc- structed Year round Team 100,000 STAKE-
tion of perimeter School head HOLDERS

School Improve-
ment Plan 30
 perimeter fence
fence C
(ACR of H
the activ-
ity) A
P
Construc- Con- Project
tion of 1 CR structed 1 Year round Team 1,000 MOOE T
CR School head E
(ACR of R
the activ-
ity)
3

Construc- Year round Project

tion of path- Con- Team 50,000 LESAA
way structed School head Fund
pathway
STAKE-
HOLDERS
(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Construc- Con- Project

tion of structed Year round Team 80,000 LESAA
Canopy Canopy School head Fund

(ACR of STAKE-
the activ- HOLDERS
ity)

Project Title: Project LAS

Problem Statement: Not all subject School Learning Modules (SLM) was re-
lease/provide by national office, school capacitate teacher to localized/contextu-
alized Learning Activity Sheet appropriate to the learners needs.
Project Objective Statement:
To localized the Learning Activity Sheet
To contextualized the Learning Activity Sheets
To provide pupils modules appropriate their learning needs
To submit SLM for approval before its used.

Root Cause: C
Not All Subject have SLM H
School Improve- A
ment Plan 31
P
T
 SLM has plenty of pages
SLM was need revision
Mother Tongue subject not written as Norte Samarnon
SLM has error needs evaluation

Project Work Plan & Budget Matrix

Activity Output Date of Responsi- Budget Budget
Implementa- ble Person Source
tion

Conduct Distribu- Project

Staff meet- tion of February 2021 Team MOOE
ing Topic School head 150.00

(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Conduct Conducted February 2021 Project

SLAC on SLAC Ses- Team 3,600.00 MLGU
LAS contex- sion School head
tualization
and Local-
ization (ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Presenta- Presented Project

tion of Out- LAS out- March 2021 Team 150.00 MOOE
put for Pre- put School head
validation
(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Presenta- Presented
tion of Out- LAS out- 150.00 MOOE
put for Pre- put
validation to
the district (ACR of
level the activ-
ity)

Submission Submitted Project

of output to LAS out- March 2021 Team MOOE
division put to the School head 150.00
level for fi- division
nal valida- level for fi-
tion and up- nal valida-
loading to tion and

School Improve-
ment Plan 32
 LRMDS por- uploading
tal. to LRMDS C
portal.
(ACR of
H
the activ- A
ity)
P
T
Implemen- Imple- April 2021- On- Project
tation of mented ward Team
E
Contextual- contextu- School head 150.00 MOOE R
ized/local- alized /
ized LAS in Localized
the school LAS in 3
Liberty ES

Project Title: Project HLI (Healthy Learning Institutions)

School Improve-
ment Plan 33
 Problem Statement: The school is not compliance with the existing school
healthy policy and to capacitate teachers to comprehensive approach to educa-
tion that consider physical, mental, emotional and social aspect of well-being.
Project Objective Statement:
To conduct Healthy Learning Institutions (HLI) to the school personnels and
stakeholders
To implement the HLI and its guidelines
Monitor the progress of the program.

Root Cause: C
Teacher, Parents, Stakeholders & learners needs HLI training (SLAC). H
HLI is new program.
A
Project Work Plan & Budget Matrix
P
Activity Output Date of Responsi- Budget Budget T
Implementa- ble Person Source E
tion
R
Conduct Distribu- Project
Staff meet- tion of August 2023 Team MOOE
ing Topic School head 1,000.00 3

(ACR of
the activ-
ity)

Conduct Conducted September Project

General PTA GPTA 2023 Team 3,600.00 MLGU
meeting on meeting. School head
HLI
(ACR of
the activ-
ity)
Implemen- Implement September Teachers MOOE
tation of / inte- 2023
Health grated HLI
Learning In- to learning
stitutions compe-
tency

Monitoring Monitor Project

the conduct HLI to the October- Team MOOE
of HLI per learning December 2023 School head
classroom compe-
tency

(ACR of
the activ-

School Improve-
ment Plan 34
 ity)

School Improve-
ment Plan 35
 2021 Annual Implementation Plan (AIP)
Liberty Elementary School/ School Head
2020 PHYSICAL TARGETS Resource Requirements 2021 FINANCIAL TARGETS Financial Support
2020 2021 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Human Resource
Accomp Targets Physical/ Ma- Remarks/ Specifications
PLANNED OUTPUTS PROGRAMS/ PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES SUCCESS INDICATOR lishment s
MOVs Responsible Per- Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total Amount Source
Participants terial

May
Mar

Aug

Nov
Apr
Feb

Jun

Dec
sons

Jan

Sep

Oct
Jul
KRA 1. Access
Objective. Increase/Sustain/maintain participation rate.
Major Output. Increase/Sustain/Maintain enrollment and nutritional status
Conducted community mapping (in all school- Mapping of school age and out of school chil- No. of mapping conducted ₱300
Teachers, Brgy Of-
aged children and Out of School Youth) dren. Community Mapping Printed Tool Mapping
1 1 1 School Head ficials, BNS, BHW Stationaries ₱300 MOOE
Tool Forms

Teachers,
Facilitated the conduct advocacy campaign Facilitate the conduct advocacy campaign on No. of Advocacy campaign con- ACR/ Early reg. form Parents, Brgy Offi- Stationaries, Tar- Printed Tarpaulin at Php.
1 1 1 School Head ₱300 300 MOOE
on early registration. early registration. ducted. cials, BNS, BHW paulin 300

Teachers, Parents,
Facilitated the conduct of OPLAN BALIK No. of OPLAN BALIK ESKWELA ACR and Balik Brgy Officials, Stationaries, Tar- Printed Tarpaulin at Php.
Facilitate the conduct of OPLAN BA- 1 1 1 School Head ₱300 300 MOOE
ESKWELA facilitated. Eswela Form BNS, paulin 300
LIK ESKWELA BHW
Teachers,
Monitored enrollment of all school aged Monitor enrollment of all school aged chil-
No. of monitoring 4 4 1 1 1 1 SF1, SF4 School Head Parents, Brgy Offi- Stationaries ₱100 ₱100 ₱100 ₱100 400 MOOE Printed OSY forms
children/OSC/OSY dren/OSC/OSY
cials
Validated the result of cohort sur- Validate the result of cohort survival rate Performance Indi- Validated the Cohort Sur-
No. of validation 1 1 1 School Head Teachers Stationaries MOOE
vival rate cator vival Rate

Performance Indica- Monitored Completion

Monitored completers Monitor completers No. of monitoring 1 1 1 School Head Teachers Stationaries MOOE
tor, SF 6 Rate

Teachers, Parents, Monitored pupils at risk

Monitored learners at risk of dropping out Monitor learners at risk of dropping out SF1, SF4, SF2,
No. of monitoring 4 4 1 1 1 1 School Head Brgy Officials Stationaries MOOE of dropping out (PARDO)
(PARDO/SARDO) (PARDO/SARDO) SDGT

Teachers, Parents, Monitored learners saved

Monitored learners saved from dropping out Monitor learners saved from dropping out SF1, SF4, SF2,
No. of monitoring 0 0 School Head Brgy Officials Stationaries from dropping out
SDGT

Teachers,
Monitored learners no longer in school. SF1, SF4, SF2, Monitored learners no
Monitor learners no longer in school. No. of monitoring 1 4 1 1 1 1 School Head Parents, Brgy Offi- Stationaries MOOE
SDGT longer in school.
cials
Teachers,
SF1, SF4, SF2, Monitored school leavers
Monitored school leavers Monitor school leavers No. of monitoring 2 2 1 1 School Head Parents, Brgy Offi- Stationaries MOOE
SDGT
cials
Teachers, Parents,
SF1, SF4, SF2, Validated Drop-out rate
Validated Drop-out rate Validate Drop-out rate No. of monitoring 4 4 1 1 1 1 School Head Brgy Officials Stationaries MOOE
SDGT

Teachers, Parents,
SF1, SF4, Monitored repeater Rate
Monitored repeaters Monitor repeaters No. of monitoring 2 2 1 1 School Head Brgy Stationaries MOOE
SF2,SDGT Officials
Teachers, Parents, Monitored learners with
Monitored learners with 100% attendance. Monitor learners with 100% at-
No. of monitoring 10 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SF2, SF4, SDGT School Head Brgy Officials Stationaries MOOE 100% attendance.
tendance.

Teachers, Monitored learners

Monitored learners with incidence of tardi- Monitor learners with incidence of tardi-
No. of monitoring 10 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SF2, SF4, SDGT School Head Parents, Brgy Offi- Stationaries - MOOE with incidence of tardiness
ness ness.
cials
Teachers, Monitored learners
Monitored learners with habitual absenteeism Monitor learners with habitual absenteeism.
No. of monitoring 10 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SF2, SF4, SDGT School Head Parents, Brgy Offi- Stationaries - MOOE with habitual absenteeism
cials
Facilitated the
Facilitated the submission of Nutri- Facilitate the submission of Nutritional Status No. of Nutritional Status Report facil- Teachers, School submission of
2 2 1 1 SF8, SDGT School Head Stationaries MOOE
tional Status Report Report itated Nurse Nutritional Status Report

700 400 100 100 1,300

Total 1,300

School Improvement Plan

 School Improvement Plan 34
KRA 2. QUALITY
Objective: To improve the academic performance of the learners/students.
Major Output: Increase/Improve MPS in all subject areas.

No. of TOS and test questions (by sub- 4 4 1 1 1 1 CID Tool # 10 SH Teachers Stationaries ₱0
Checked the TOS and Test Questions vis-a- Check the TOS and Test Questions vis-a-vis
ject area) vis-à-vis the LCD checked.
vis the LCD the LCD

Faciltated the reproduction of Testing Mate- No. of test materials reproduced (Testing 2 2 1 1 Distribution List SH Teachers Stationaries ₱500 ₱500 ₱1,000 PTA Faciltated the reproduction of
Faciltate the reproduction of Testing Materials
rials for ECCD Checklist, Phil-IRI, Diagnostic Materials for ECCD Checklist, Phil-IRI, Funds/ Testing Materials for ECCD
for ECCD Checklist, Phil-IRI, Diagnostic Test,
Test, Post Test, Quarterly Test & NAT/ Diagnostic Test, Post Test, Quarterly Test MOOE Checklist, Phil-IRI, Post
Post Test, Quarterly Test & NAT/ELLNA Re- Test, & ELLNA Review Ma-
ELLNA Review Materials. & NAT/ELLNA Review Materials)
view Materials. terials.

No. of classes monitored 4 4 1 1 1 1 ₱0 Monitored classess on

Monitored classess on the utilization of Test Monitor classes on the utilization of Test M&E Tool & Test
the utilization of Test
Item Bank Item Bank Item bank
Item Bank

Facilitated the
Facilitated the submission of Quarterly Facilitate the submission of Quarterly MPS / No. of reports facilitated on Quarterly 4 4 1 1 1 1 SDGT Teachers Computer ₱0 submission of Quar-
SH, ICT
MPS /assessments report by the teachers assessments report by the teachers MPS /assessments report by the teachers terly MPS
Coordinator
/assessments report
by the teachers
2020 PHYSICAL TARGETS Resource Requirements 2021 FINANCIAL TARGETS Financial Support
2020 2021 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Human Resource
Accomp Targets Physical/ Ma- Remarks/ Specifica-
PLANNED OUTPUTS PROGRAMS/ PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES SUCCESS INDICATOR lishment s
MOVs Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total Amount Source
Responsible Per-
Participants terial tions

May
Mar

Aug
Apr

Nov
Jun
Feb

Dec
Jan

Sep

Oct
sons

Jul
Accomplished Test
Facilitated the submission
Facilitated the submission of Quarterly Test Facilitate the submission of Quarterly Test No. of reports facilitated on Quarterly Test Item Analysis
4 4 1 1 1 1 SH Teachers Stationaries ₱0 of Quarterly Assessment
Item Analysis Report. Item Analysis Report. Item Analysis. Template
report (MPS)

Facilitated the
Facilitated the submission of identified Least No. of reports on identified Least Learned submission of identi-
Facilitate the submission of identified Least 83 83 36 36 36 36 List of Least SH Teachers Stationaries ₱0
Learned Competencies based on Quarterly Competencies based on Quarterly Test fied Least Learned
Learned Competencies based on Quarterly Test Learned Competen-
Test Item Analysis Item Analysis facilitated. Competencies based on
Item Analysis cies
Quarterly Test Item

Facilitated the submis-

Facilitated the submission of the quarterly No. of reports facilitated on quarterly as- 4 4 1 1 1 1 SDGT Teachers Stationaries ₱0
Facilitate the submission of the quarterly as- SH, ICT sion of the quarterly as-
assessmsent (Mastery Level) sessmsent (Mastery Level)
sessmsent (Mastery Level) Coordinator sessmsent (Mastery
Level)

Monitored the submission

Monitored the submission of Quarterly LCD Monitor the 8 teachers the submission of No. of Submitted Quarterly LCD to deter- 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 LCD SH Teachers Stationaries ₱0 of Quarterly LCD to deter-
to determine the percentage of coverage by Quarterly LCD to determine the percentage of mine the percentage of
mine the percentage of
subject area. coverage by subject area. coverage by subject area monitored. coverage by subject area /
quarter

Monitored 8 classes with

Monitored classes with below 100 % compe- Monitor classes with below 100 % competency No. of classes monitored with below 100 4 4 1 1 1 1 SDGT SH, ₱0
below 100 % competency
tency coverage by subject area. coverage by subject area. % competency coverage by subject area.
coverage by subject area /
Quarter

Monitored 8 classes im-

No. of classes monitored on contextualized 4 4 1 1 1 1 SDGT, CID Tool Teachers Stationaries ₱0
Monitored classes implementing contextual- Monitor eight classes implementing contextual- SH, ICT plementing contextual-
curriculum implementation.
ized curriculum. ized curriculum. Coordinator ized curriculum / quar-
ter

Facilitated/monitored the submis- Facilitate/monitor the submission of PHIL- No. of Phil-IRI reports facilitated/moni- SDGT & Phil IRI SH, ICT 83 pupils X 2 quarter X
2 2 1 1 Teachers Stationaries ₱664 ₱664 ₱1,328
sion of PHIL-IRI reports IRI reports tored Results Coordinator 4 copiesX Php.1
Facilitated/monitore
Facilitated/monitored the submission of Facilitate/monitor the submission of Numer- No. of Numeracy reports facilitated/moni- SH, ICT Computer,St
4 4 1 1 1 1 SDGT Teachers ₱0 d the submission of Nu-
Numeracy reports acy reports tored Coordinator ationery
meracy reports
Facilitated the
Facilitated the submission of pro- Facilitated the submission of pro- Computer,St
No. of reports facilitated 1 1 1 SDGT, SF5&6 SH Teachers ₱0 submission of promo-
motion Rate motion Rate ationery
tion Rate
Total ₱2,328

School Improvement Plan

School Improvement Plan 35

T
KRA 3. GOVERNANCE 5 45 2 43 1 4 41 4 41

Objective 1: Improve teachers' competence in teaching. 124 124 13 3 52 4 3 50 57 48 7 3 48

Major Output: Enhanced teachers' professional development.

CID M & E
Conducted instructional supervision Conduct instructional supervision Bond Paper, Printed of CID Tools
43 Eight teachers supervised monthly. 150 150 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Report, COT, School Head Teachers 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 800.00 MOOE
monthly. monthly. Ink = x 4 quarters =
SDGT
Conducted training needs Conduct training needs PPST-RPMS,
Bond Paper, Printed of SAT/COT Reports =
44 assessment/IPPD/SPPD/Self Assess- assessment/IPPD/SPPD/Self- As- No. of TSNA/IPPD/SPPD/SAT 7 7 7 IPPD, SPPD, School Head Teachers 500.00 500.00 MOOE
ment Tool sessment Tool SAT Ink x 1 quarter =

ACR,
No. of trainings conducted, Bond Paper,
45-48, Conducted/facilitated/attended: Conduct/facilitate/attend: Attendance School Head Teachers 0.00 MOOE Printed of ACR = x 4
facilitated, attended. Ink
85 Sheet quarters =

K-12 Trainings K-12 Trainings 0.00

INSET INSET 4 4 1 1 1 1 0.00

SLAC SLAC 40 40 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 36 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 2,000.00 MOOE

SDS, ASD,
Other Trainings Other Trainings 20 20 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 EPS Teachers 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 2,000.00 MOOE

1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,300.00

Total 5,300.00

Objective 2: 1. Improve the physical facilities. 221 221 21 21 22 0 0 22 28 21 22 21 21 22

2. Monitor DCP Package utilization.

Major Output: 1. Improved physical facilities.
2. Monitored DCP Package utilization.
School Head, School and Dis- Miantained/ sustained
Maintained/sustained school Maintain/sustanin school No. of school facilities/equipment Bond Paper,
49-60, 2 2 1 1 Inventory Report School Prop. trict Property 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 6,000.00 MOOE school
facilities/equipment. facilities/equipment. provision requested Custodian Custodian Ink facilities/eqiupment

School Head, School and District Requested for the

Requested for the provision of school Request for the provision of school No. of provision of school
49-60 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 Inventory Report School Prop. Property Custodian provision of school fa-
facilities/equipment. facilities/equipment. facilities/equipment.
Custodian cilities/equipment
Teacher, School Operational
78 Facilitated school titling. Facilitated school titling. School titling facilitated. School Title School Head Prop. Cust. Expenses 0.00 MOOE Mun. of Catarman

School Head, School and Dis-

Monitored the status of DCP Package Monitor the status of DCP Package Bond Paper,
107-109 No of monitoring. 4 4 1 1 1 1 Inventory Report School Prop. trict Property 0.00 MOOE Operational Expenses
utilization. utilization. Custodian Custodian Ink

1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 6,000.00

Total 6,000.00

Objectives 3: 1. Monitor/assess/evaluate teachers' IPCRF rating and classroom/record management. 12 12 1 12 1 1 2 2

2. Provide technical assistance as to: Classroom Management, Curriculum Implementation, Teaching- Learning Assessment, Access to LRMDS.
Major Output: Improved/enhanced teachers' teaching performance.
No. of classroom observations con-
Monitored/assessed/evaluated: Monitor/assess/evaluate: 0.00
ducted. 1

School Improvement Plan

 Printed IPCRF/
IPCRF 2 2 1 IPCRF, COT School Head Teachers 0.00
OPCRF of Reports

CID Tools, Teachers' M & E Tool 150 150 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 CID Tools School Head Teachers 0.00 Printed of Reports

Provided TA on: No. of teachers provided TA. 60 60 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

School Improvement Plan 36

2020 PHYSICAL TARGETS Resource Requirements 2021 FINANCIAL TARGETS Financial Support
2020 2021 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Human Resource
Accomp Targets Physical/ Ma- Remarks/ Specifications
PROGRAMS/ PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES SUCCESS INDICATOR lishment s
MOVs Responsible Per- Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total Amount Source
sons
Participants terial

May
Mar

Aug

Nov
Apr
Feb

Jun

Dec
Jan

Sep

Oct
Jul
PLANNED OUTPUTS
63-66 classroom management imple-
classroom management implementation No. of teachers monitored with 60 60 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 M & E Tools School head Teachers Bond Paper, 0.00 TA reports
mentation
100% attendance. Ink
curriculum implementation curriculum implementation 10 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 CID Tools School Head Teachers 0.00 TA reports
teaching- learning & assessment teaching- learning & assessment 4 4 1 1 1 1 0.00 TA reports
Online Regis-
access to LRMDS access to LRMDS 4 4 1 1 1 1 School Head Teachers 0.00 LRMDS Account
tration,
Form 7 / certi-
68
Monitor teachers' attendance/participa-
Teachers' attendance/participation 60 60 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 fication School Head Teachers 0.00 Printed Reports
tion. participation
Total 0.00
Objective 4: Monitor the involvement of stakeholders/organizations. 350 350 35 34 36 1 35 33 34 35 35 33 35
Major Output: Functional SGC, PTA, Alumni, etc.

67 Organized School Governing Council, Organize School Governing Council, No. of School Stakeholders 3 3 1 2 ACR School Head School Stake- Bond Paper, 0.00 MOOE Printed of Reports
Parent Teacher Association, Alumni, Parent Teacher Association, Alumni, Organization organized. holders, Teach- Ink
and other School Stakeholder's Orga- and other School Stakeholder's Organi- ers
nization in co-curricular activities, ex- zation in co-curricular activities, extra
tra co-curricular, activities, and as- co-curricular, activities, and assem-
semblies. blies.

ACR,
Monitored stakeholders' participation/ Monitor stakeholders' participation/in- School Stake-
No. of stakeholders' participation Attendance Bond Paper, Printed of Reports,
79-80 involvement and donations. volvement and donations. 17 17 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 School Head holders, Teach- 0.00 MOOE
monitored. Sheet, Book of Ink Attendance Sheets
Donation ers
Total 0.00
Objective 5: Assess SIP/AIP implementation based on SMEA result.

Major Output: Tracked accomplishment vis a vis on SMEA results.

School Improvement Plan

 Assessed SIP/AIP implementation as SMEA Report Bond Paper, Printing of SMEA Re-
82 Assess SIP/AIP implementation as to: No. of accomplishment vs. target. School Head Teachers MOOE
to: (SDGT) Ink ports
Access Access 54 57 8 3 7 2 3 7 4 3 7 3 3 7 0.00
Quality Quality 124 124 13 3 52 4 3 50 5 7 48 7 3 48 0.00
Governance Governance 1115 1141 106 97 116 39 38 113 106 98 116 100 94 114 0.00
Total 0.00

Total

School Improvement Plan 37

School Improvement Plan 40

School Improvement Plan

Chapter 4.
C
Monitoring & Evaluation H
Depending on the timeline set by the Project Teams in their project designs, the A
SPT will monitor progress at the middle and end of the implementation period. For P
longer projects, the SPT will have to monitor more than twice. The scheduled dates
shall be indicated on the Project Monitoring Form.
T
E
The SPT shall guide and help the Project Teams in resolving problems especially
during the early stage of the project implementation.
R
To keep the SPT adept of the project status, each Project Team will submit a
progress report using the Project Monitoring Report Form. Both the SPT and the 4
Project Team will discuss the Recommendations / Action Points based on the re-
sults of the monitoring done by the SPT.

Table 11

Project Monitoring Report Form

Schedule Dates of monitoring

Mid-Year______________________________ Year-End _______________________________

Name of Project Date of Accom- Issues/ Recom- Signature

Project Objec- Monitor- plish- Problems/ menda- of SPT
tives and ing ments Chal- tions/Ac- and
Targets status to lenges tions Project
date Points Team
1 2 3 4 5 6 Leader
7

School Improve-
ment Plan
410
Prepared by:
School Community Planning Team
NAME Signature
ROBERTO RUBEN F. PULGA C
HON. LITO BENESISTO H
EDRALYN T. DIAZ
A
JUDESSA F. ATENCIO
LEIZEL B. TRONGCOSO P
EVA V. DELORINO T
RIC T. CATUNHAY E
JEMMY A. ATENCIO
ARTHUR D. VILLANUEVA
R
SALVE C. DIANO
MARBEN L. ALEJANDRO 4
ROYALLY CATUNHAY

Appraised by:

______________________________ ++++++++++++++++++++
Member Principal-In-Charge

____________________________
EPS-Mathematics

Reviewed:
_________________________
Chief, Curriculum Implementation Division

Recommending Approval:

___________________________________
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Approved:
____________________________________
Schools Division Superintendent

School Improve-
ment Plan 421